Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
CHAPTER 11
DEPRECIATION, IMPAIRMENT, AND
DISPOSITION
ASSIGNMENT CLASSIFICATION TABLE
Brief
Exercises
Exercises
1. Concept of
depreciation.
1
1
2. Factors in
determining
depreciation
charges.
2, 3
2, 9, 10,
22
1, 2, 4, 5,
7, 11
1, 2
3. Meaning and
choice of methods.
4, 5, 6, 7
1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 28
1, 2, 4, 5,
7, 11
1
4. Calculation of
depreciation.
4, 5, 6, 7
2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7,,8, 9,
10, 23, 28
1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8,
11, 12, 14,
15, 17
1, 3
5. Depletion.
8, 9
11, 12, 13
9, 10
6. Errors; Changes in
estimates.
9
14, 15, 16,
22, 23
2, 5, 6, 11,
15
7. Impairment.
10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15
17, 18, 19,
20, 21
12
8. Assets held for
sale.
16
21
3, 6, 13,
15
Topics
Problems
Writing
Assignments
3
Solutions Manual
11-1
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
ASSIGNMENT CLASSIFICATION TABLE (CONTINUED)
Topics
9. Dispositions.
Brief
Exercises
17, 18
Exercises
Problems
22, 23, 24,
25, 26
3, 6, 13,
15
10. Disclosures.
11. Ratio analysis.
5
12, 13
19
27
7
12. Differences
between ASPE
and IFRS.
*13. Tax depreciation
(CCA).*
Writing
Assignments
4, 6, 7
20
28, 29, 30
1, 2, 4, 16,
17
*This material is covered in an Appendix to the chapter.
Solutions Manual
11-2
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
ASSIGNMENT CHARACTERISTICS TABLE
Item
Description
E11-1
E11-2
E11-3
Choice of depreciation method.
Depreciation calculations—SL, DDB.
Depreciation calculations—SL, DDB—
partial periods.
Depreciation calculations—five methods,
partial periods.
Depreciation calculations—SL, DDB—
partial periods.
Depreciation calculations—SL, DDB.
Depreciation—conceptual understanding.
Depreciation for fractional periods.
Error analysis and depreciation—SL and
DDB.
Error analysis and depreciation—SL and
DDB.
Depletion calculations—timber.
Depletion calculations—oil.
Depletion calculations—minerals.
Depreciation—change in estimate.
Depreciation calculation—addition,
change in estimate.
Depreciation—replacement, change in
estimate.
Impairment—cost recovery model.
Impairment—cash-generating units.
Impairment—rational entity model and
cash-generating units.
Impairment—cost recovery and rational
entity models.
Impairment—cost recovery and rational
entity models.
Depreciation calculation-replacement,
trade-in.
Depreciation calculations—revaluation
model, change in estimate, disposal
Entries for disposition of assets.
Entries for disposition of assets.
Disposition of assets.
Ratio analysis.
Depreciation calculations—four methods,
partial periods.
E11-4
E11-5
E11-6
E11-7
E11-8
E11-9
E11-10
E11-11
E11-12
E11-13
E11-14
E11-15
E11-16
E11-17
E11-18
E11-19
E11-20
E11-21
E11-22
E11-23
E11-24
E11-25
E11-26
E11-27
*E11-28
Level of
Difficulty
Time
(minutes)
Moderate
Simple
15-20
10-15
Simple
15-20
Moderate
20-30
Moderate
Simple
Moderate
Moderate
Simple
25-35
15-20
20-25
25-35
10-15
Moderate
20-25
Simple
Simple
Simple
Simple
Simple
15-20
10-15
15-20
10-15
20-25
Simple
15-20
Moderate
Simple
Moderate
20-25
10-15
20-25
Moderate
20-25
Moderate
15-20
Moderate
20-25
Moderate
20-25
Simple
Moderate
Simple
Moderate
10-15
20-25
10-15
15-25
Simple
10-15
Solutions Manual
11-3
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
ASSIGNMENT CHARACTERISTICS TABLE (CONTINUED)
Item
*E11-29
*E11-30
P11-1
P11-2
P11-3
P11-4
P11-5
P11-6
P11-7
P11-9
P11-10
P11-11
P11-12
P11-13
P11-14
P11-15
*P11-16
*P11-17
Description
CCA calculations.
Book versus tax (CCA) depreciation.
Calculation of cost and depreciation for
partial periods—SL, DDB, and CCA.
Depreciation for partial periods—SL,
Activity, DDB, and CCA.
Depreciation—partial periods, machinery.
Depreciation – SL, DDB, UOP and CCA
Depreciation—Activity, SL, and DDB.
Depreciation and error analysis.
Selecting an depreciation method –
impact on decisions
Depletion and depreciation – mining.
Depletion, timber.
Comprehensive fixed-asset problem.
Impairment and asset held for sale.
Dispositions, including condemnation,
demolition, and trade-in.
Comprehensive depreciation calculations.
Comprehensive depreciation calculations,
trade-in, revised estimates.
Capital cost allowance, terminal losses,
recapture and capital gains.
Government assistance and tax values.
Level of
Difficulty
Moderate
Moderate
Simple
Time
(minutes)
15-20
15-20
25-30
Moderate
25-35
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Complex
Complex
30-45
25-35
30-45
45-60
60-70
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
25-35
25-30
25-35
25-35
35-40
Complex
Complex
45-60
45-60
Moderate
25-35
Moderate
25-35
* Includes material covered in an Appendix to the chapter.
Solutions Manual
11-4
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
SOLUTIONS TO BRIEF EXERCISES
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-1
Recording and reporting accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses provides users with relevant and faithfully
representative information. Accumulated depreciation is the
total cost of existing property, plant, and equipment that has
been allocated and matched to the revenues that it helped
generate. This is relevant information; for example, a high
amount of accumulated depreciation relative to total cost would
help users understand that the existing property, plant, and
equipment has been available for use in generating revenues for
a long period of time, or has been used extensively in generating
revenues. Recording accumulated depreciation results in
faithfully representative, neutral financial statements that are
free from bias. Accumulated impairment losses is the
cumulative amount of impairment losses that have been
recorded for existing property, plant, and equipment. An
impairment loss is recorded when carrying amount of an asset
exceeds its recoverable amount. Recording an impairment loss
provides users with faithfully representative and neutral
information about the expected benefit to be realized from an
asset, relative to its carrying amount.
Solutions Manual
11-5
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-2
(a)
Under IFRS, asset componentization is more strictly applied.
The aircraft engines would be recorded and depreciated
separately from the aircraft’s body.
October 1, 2014
Aircraft – Engines ...........................................................
20,000,000
Aircraft – Body ...............................................................
80,000,000
Cash ........................................................................100,000,000
December 31, 2014
Depreciation Expense ....................................................
2,325,000
Accumulated Depreciation –
Aircraft - Engines ................................................ 450,000 *
Accumulated Depreciation –
Aircraft - Body.....................................................1,875,000 **
* ($20,000,000 – $2,000,000) / 10 X 3/12 = $450,000
** ($80,000,000 – $5,000,000) / 10 x 3/12 = $1,875,000
(b)
Under ASPE, the practice has been not to recognize asset
components to the same extent as under IFRS. For example,
under ASPE, Ocean Airways may record the purchase of the
aircraft without asset componentization, in which case the total
$100 million cost of the aircraft would be recorded in one
Aircraft asset account on October 1, 2014, and depreciation
expense would be calculated based on useful life of the entire
aircraft.
Solutions Manual
11-6
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-3
Original Cost = $30,000 + $200 + $100 + $500 + $400 = $31,200
(a)
$31,200 – $6,000
10
X 6/12 = $1,260
(b)
$31,200 – $0
12
X 6/12 = $1,300
Under ASPE, depreciation expense is the larger of (a) original
cost less salvage value over the asset’s total expected life
($1,300), and (b) original cost less residual value over the asset’s
useful life to the entity ($1,260 calculated in part (a) above).
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-4
(a)
(b)
$100,000 – $25,000
8
$100,000 – $0
10
X 10/12= $7,813
X 10/12 = $8,333
Under ASPE, depreciation expense is the larger of the original
cost less salvage value over the asset’s total expected life
($8,333), and the original cost less residual value over the
asset’s useful life to the entity ($7,813 calculated in part (a)
above).
Solutions Manual
11-7
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-5
(a)
$60,000 – $6,000
8
= $6,750
(b)
$60,000 – $6,000
8
X 4/12 = $2,250
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-6
* Rate on declining balance = (100% ÷ 8) X 2 = 25%
(a) $60,000 X 25%*
January 1 to December 31, 2014
= $15,000
(b) 2014 Depreciation expense = 3/12 X $15,000 = $3,750
2015 depreciation expense is either:
($60,000 X 25% X 9/12) + ($45,000 X 25% X 3/12)
= $14,063
Or:
Carrying amount, Dec. 31/14 ($60,000 - $3,750) = $56,250
2015 depreciation: $56,250 X 25%
= $14,063
(c)
If the benefits of the asset are expected to flow to the entity
evenly over time, and if the decline in usefulness of the asset is
expected to be constant from period to period, there is
justification for using the straight-line method. If the greatest
benefits of the asset are expected to be yielded in the early
years, the declining-balance method better reflects the pattern of
use.
Solutions Manual
11-8
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-7
(a)
($60,000 – $6,000) X 8/36** = $12,000
** The sum-of-the-years’-digits method is a decreasing charge
method. The denominator of the fraction equals the sum of the
digits of the asset’s useful life (in this example, 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 +
6 + 7 + 8 = 36). The numerator decreases year by year, and in the
first year of the asset’s use, it is equal to the total useful life of
the asset.
(b)
[($60,000 – $6,000) X 8/36] X 9/12 = $9,000
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-8
2014:
($48,000 – $3,000) X 52,000
275,000
= $8,509
2015:
($48,000 – $3,000) X 65,000
275,000
= $10,636
Alternatively, a rate per km may be computed ($.1636) and this
amount applied to the km driven in each year to determine
depreciation expense.
Solutions Manual
11-9
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-9
Inventory ..........................................................................
97,650
Accumulated Depletion .........................................
Asset Retirement Obligation .................................
84,150
13,500*
$500,000 + $125,000 + $75,000 – $157,500
= $108.50 per tonne
5,000
900 X $108.50 = $97,650
*Liability for Future Site Restoration:
$75,000
= $15.00 per tonne
5,000
900 X $15.00 = $13,500
Note: It is likely that the site restoration costs are a function of
mining the ore, and an incremental cost caused by production.
Under IFRS, any site remediation costs associated with
production are charged to inventory as a product cost when the
site is “disfigured”. This differs from ASPE which requires that
any site remediation costs be capitalized as part of the cost of
the original asset acquired.
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-10
Annual depreciation expense: ($7,000 – $1,000) / 5 = $1,200
Carrying amount, 1/1/16: $7,000 – (2 x $1,200) = $4,600
Depreciation expense, 2016: ($4,600 – $500) / 2 = $2,050
Solutions Manual
11-10
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-11
Recoverability test:
Undiscounted future net cash flows ($500,000) < Carrying
amount ($540,000); therefore, the asset is impaired.
Journal entry:
Loss on Impairment ...............................................
140,000
Accumulated Impairment Losses Machinery .............................................. 140,000
($540,000 – $400,000)
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-12
(a)
No entry. Under the cost recovery impairment model, the
subsequent recovery of an impairment loss is not restored
for property, plant, and equipment held for use.
(b)
Under the rational entity impairment model, an impairment
loss is reversed if there is a change in the estimates used
to calculate recoverable amount. However, the reversal
amount is limited. The specific asset cannot be increased
in value to more than what its book value would have been,
net of depreciation, if the original impairment loss had
never been recognized.
Solutions Manual
11-11
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-13
(a)
Under IFRS, the recoverable amount is the higher of (1) the
asset’s value in use and (2) its fair value less costs to sell. In this
case, even though the asset was scrapped on January 1, 2015,
its value in use as of November 30, 2014 was $800,000. The
recoverable amount of $800,000 is lower than the carrying
amount of $1,000,000; therefore the asset is impaired as of the
date of the financial statements.
Note: The scrapping of the asset should be disclosed as a post–
balance sheet subsequent event if material.
(b)
Under ASPE, the recoverable amount is the undiscounted net
future cash flows from use and eventual disposal. The
recoverable amount of $1,100,000 is higher than the carrying
amount of $1,000,000; therefore the asset is not impaired as of
the date of the financial statements.
Note: The scrapping of the asset should be disclosed as a post–
balance sheet subsequent event if material.
Solutions Manual
11-12
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-14
(a)
At December 31, 2014:
The recoverable amount is $425,000 (the higher of the asset’s
(1) value in use of $425,000 and (2) fair value less costs to sell of
$400,000).
Impairment loss:
Carrying amount......................................
Less: Recoverable amount ....................
Impairment loss .......................................
$500,000
425,000
$ 75,000
Loss on Impairment ...............................................
75,000
Accumulated Impairment Losses
Land .........................................................
($500,000 – $425,000)
75,000
(b)
At December 31, 2015:
Accumulated Impairment Losses –
Land ...................................................................
75,000
Recovery of Loss from
Impairment ............................................
($500,000 – $425,000)
75,000
Reversal of the impairment loss is limited to the amount
required to increase the asset’s carrying amount to what it
would have been if the impairment loss had not been recorded.
In this case the original cost of the land is $500,000 and
accumulated impairment losses recorded to date is $75,000.
Since the current recoverable amount of $550,000 (higher of
value in use of $550,000 and fair value less costs to sell of
$480,000) is higher than the original cost of the land, recovery of
impairment losses is limited to $75,000.
Solutions Manual
11-13
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-15
(a)
Under ASPE, because the buildings and equipment are
specialized and cannot generate cash flows on their own, they
are combined into an asset group with the land. The carrying
amount of the asset group is $60,000. The cost recovery model
applies a recoverability test to determine if there is impairment.
The asset group’s carrying amount of $60,000 is compared to
undiscounted net future cash flows of $70,000. Since the asset
group’s carrying amount can be recovered (i.e. the asset group’s
undiscounted net future cash flows are greater than the asset
group’s carrying amount), there is no impairment, and no
impairment loss is recorded.
(b)
Under the IFRS rational entity model, the cash generating unit’s
(CGU’s) carrying amount of $60,000 is compared to recoverable
amount of $45,000 (the higher of the CGU’s value in use of
$45,000 and fair value less costs to sell of $35,000).
Carrying amount of CGU.........................$60,000
Less: Recoverable amount .................... 45,000
Impairment loss .......................................$15,000
The impairment loss is then allocated to the individual assets in
the CGU, but no individual asset can be reduced to below the
highest of (1) its value in use, (2) its fair value less costs to sell,
or (3) zero. In this case, the land is not impaired (recoverable
amount is greater than carrying amount), thus the $15,000 loss
is allocated to the buildings and equipment.
Allocation:
Buildings
Equipment
Carrying
Amount
$30,000
10,000
$40,000
Proportion
30/40
10/40
Loss
Allocation
$ 11,250
3,750
$15,000
Solutions Manual
11-14
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-15 (Continued)
The journal entry to record the impairment is:
Loss on Impairment ...............................................
15,000
Accumulated Impairment Losses–
Building ........................................................
Accumulated Impairment Losses–
Equipment ....................................................
11,250
3,750
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-16
(a)
Loss on Impairment .......................................................
500,000 *
Accumulated Impairment
Losses – Building ..............................................
500,000
* $1,500,000 - $1,000,000 = $500,000
Note: Assets that are held for sale are not depreciated while they
are held for sale.
(b)
Under IFRS, since the building meets the stringent requirements
for classification as held for sale, the building would also meet
criteria for classification as a current asset on the statement of
financial position.
(c)
Under ASPE, the building can be classified as a current asset on
the statement of financial position only if it is sold before the
financial statements are completed, and the proceeds to be
received qualify as a current asset. Otherwise, the building
would be classified as a non-current asset.
Solutions Manual
11-15
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-17
(a)
Depreciation Expense ($3,000 X 8/12) ...........................
2,000
Accumulated Depreciation Machinery ............................................................2,000
(b)
Cash ................................................................................
13,500
Accumulated Depreciation Machinery .....................................................................
8,000
Machinery ...............................................................
20,000
Gain on Disposal of Machinery .............................1,500
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-18
(a)
Depreciation Expense ($3,000 X 8/12) ...........................
2,000
Accumulated Depreciation Machinery ............................................................2,000
(b)
Cash ................................................................................
5,200
Loss on Disposal of Machinery .....................................
6,800
Accumulated Depreciation Machinery .....................................................................
8,000
Machinery ...............................................................
20,000
Solutions Manual
11-16
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
BRIEF EXERCISE 11-19
(a)
Asset turnover ratio:
$2,687
= 1.22 times
($1,923 + $2,487)/2
(b)
Profit margin:
$52
= 1.94%
$2,687
(c)
Rate of return on assets:
1. 1.94% X 1.22 = 2.36%, or
2.
$52
= 2.36%
($1,923 + $2,487)/2
*BRIEF EXERCISE 11-20
2014:
2015:
2016:
2017:
$45,000 X 20% X 1/2
$40,500 X 20%
$32,400 X 20%
$25,920 X 20%
=
=
=
=
$ 4,500
8,100
6,480
5,184
Solutions Manual
11-17
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES
EXERCISE 11-1 (15-20 minutes)
(a) Factors to consider in establishing the asset’s useful life
include the following:
physical life of the asset (this may be the case for example
for the board room table and chairs, weight and aerobic
equipment and trucks based on kilometres);
timing of replacement by more efficient and economical
assets (for example dental equipment); and
obsolescence due to new technological advances (for
example, computers) or due to new techniques (for
example weight and aerobic equipment)
(b) (1) boardroom table and chairs: straight-line method with
useful life of the asset determined based on physical life
of the assets. All accounting periods will benefit equally
from the use of the table and chairs and the straight-line
method will achieve the best matching of costs to
benefits received.
(2) dental equipment: straight-line method with useful life of
the asset based on supersession by more efficient and
economical assets or based on new technological
advances or new techniques. All accounting periods will
benefit equally from the use of the dental equipment and
the straight-line method will achieve the best matching of
costs to benefits received.
(3) long haul trucks for the trucking business: activity
method with depreciation as a function of kilometres
driven. The trucks will contribute proportionately more to
revenues in periods of heavier usage and this method will
result in better matching of costs to revenues generated.
Solutions Manual
11-18
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-1 (Continued)
(4) weight and aerobic equipment: straight-line method with
depreciation as a function of obsolescence due to new
techniques and fashions in the fitness industry. For
certain types of equipment, physical life may be more
appropriate, where the equipment is not subject to
obsolescence (for example, free weights). For certain
types of equipment, a declining-balance method could
also be used based on greater benefits received in the
early years, for example, equipment which is subject to
fashions or trends in fitness.
(5) classroom computers: straight-line method with useful
life of the asset determined based on obsolescence due
to technological advances. The computers contribute to
revenues equally in all years that they are used. A
declining-balance method could also be used if greater
benefits are received in the early years when the
equipment can be used in programs where more
technologically advanced equipment is required to attract
students to the college, or where repair costs increase as
the equipment gets older. The equipment would then be
rotated to open labs for general students and to staff after
a few years of use. For either the straight-line or declining
balance methods, a group method would likely be used
because of the large numbers of individual computers
used.
(c) Estimates of asset useful life are estimates of expected
benefit or utility to the company. Arriving at a good estimate
of asset useful life requires information about expected
usage, expected repairs, planned maintenance, and eventual
technical or commercial obsolescence. With this
information, a company can also manage its assets better,
ensure that expected asset benefit or utility to the company
is yielded, and run its business more efficiently.
Solutions Manual
11-19
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-2 (10-15 minutes)
(a)
Total cost of property = $220,000 + $3,000 + $1,500
= $224,500
Cost of the building = $224,500 X 75% = $168,375
(b)
Depreciable amount = Cost – Residual Value
= $168,375 – $115,000 = $53,375
(c)
Useful life is limited to 10 years. This is the number of
years the building will contribute economic benefits to the
company.
(d)
Depreciation expense 2014 (straight-line)
= ($168,375 – $115,000) / 10 X 3.5 months/12 = $1,557
(e)
Depreciation expense 2014 (double-declining)
= $168,375 X 20%* X 3.5 months/12 = $9,822
Depreciation expense 2015 = ($168,375 – $9,822) X 20%*
= $31,711
* Rate = (1 ÷ 10) X 2 = 20%
(f)
Carrying amount = $168,375 – $9,822 – $31,711 = $126,842
(g)
Under ASPE, depreciation expense is the higher of two
amounts: (1) cost less salvage value over the life of the
asset, and (2) cost less residual value over the asset’s
useful life.
Under ASPE, depreciation expense 2014 (straight-line)
= ($168,375 - $0) / 20 X 3.5 months/12 = $2,455
Solutions Manual
11-20
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-3 (15-20 minutes)
(a)
$769,000 – $300,000
20 years
= $23,450 per year
2014: $23,450 X 9/12 = $17,588
2015: $23,450
(b)
100%
= 5%; 5% X 2 = 10%
20
9/12 X 10% X $769,000 = $57,675 for 2014
10% X ($769,000 – $57,675) = $71,133 for 2015
OR
+
3/12 X 10% X $769,000
9/12 X 10% X ($769,000 – $76,900)
=
=
$19,225
51,908
$71,133 for 2015
These two differing approaches will always yield the same result.
(c)
$769,000 – $0
30 years
= $25,633 per year
2014: $25,633 X 9/12 = $19,225
2015: $25,633
Under ASPE, depreciation expense is the higher of two
amounts: (1) cost less salvage value over the life of the asset,
and (2) cost less residual value over the asset’s useful life.
(1) ($769,000 -0) / 30 = $25,633
(2) ($769,000 - $300,000) / 20 = $23,450
Solutions Manual
11-21
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-3 (Continued)
(d)
It might be more appropriate to select the straight-line
method if the benefits of the asset are expected to flow to
the entity evenly over time, and if the decline in usefulness
of the asset is expected to be constant from period to
period. It might be more appropriate to select the doubledeclining-balance method if the greatest benefits of the
asset are expected to be yielded in the early years.
Solutions Manual
11-22
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-4 (20-30 minutes)
(a)
2014 Straight-line
$315,000 – $15,000
= $30,000/year
10 years
(b)
2014 Output
$315,000 – $15,000
= $1.25/output unit
240,000 total units
25,500 units X $1.25 = $31,875
(c)
2014 Working hours
$315,000 – $15,000
25,000 total hours
= $12.00/hour
2,650 hours X $12.00 = $31,800
(d)
Declining balance 2013: 1/10 X 2 = 20%.
2013: 20% X $315,000 X 8/12 = $42,000
2014: 20% X ($315,000 – $42,000) = $54,600
OR
1st full year (20% X $315,000) = $63,000
2nd full year [20% X ($315,000 – $63,000)] = $50,400
2013 Depreciation 8/12 X $63,000 = $42,000
2014 Depreciation 4/12 X $63,000 = $21,000
8/12 X $50,400 = 33,600
$54,600
Solutions Manual
11-23
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-4 (Continued)
(e)
10 + 9 + 8 + 7 + 6
+ 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 55
OR
n (n + 1)
2
=
10 (11)
= 55
2
Sum-of-the-years’-digits
Year 1 10/55 X $300,000* =
2 9/55 X $300,000 =
Total
$54,545
$49,091
Allocated to
2013
2014
$36,363
$18,182
_______
_32,727
$36,363
$50,909
2014: $50,909 = (4/12 of 1st year of machine’s life plus 8/12
of 2nd year of machine’s life).
*Cost of $315,000 less residual value of $15,000
(f)
CCA 2013: $315,000 X ½ X 20% = $31,500
CCA 2014: ($315,000 - $31,500) X 20% = $56,700
(g)
Since the capital cost allowance approach is required for
tax purposes, for simplicity, it is common for smaller
companies to use the capital cost allowance approach for
financial reporting purposes as well. A potential investor
would want to base their investment decision on relevant
and faithfully representative information. The capital cost
allowance approach is based on the rules as defined in the
Income Tax Act, and may not necessarily reflect the
expected usage or pattern in which the asset benefits are
expected to be consumed, rendering financial statements
not as relevant to a potential investor. However, the capital
cost allowance approach requires no estimates of residual
value, salvage value, useful life, or physical life. As a
result, calculation of depreciation expense may be more
neutral and free from bias.
Solutions Manual
11-24
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-5 (25-35 minutes)
Methods of Depreciation
Description
A
B
C
Date
Purchased
12/02/13
08/15/12
07/21/11
Cost
142,500
79,000
75,400
Residual
16,000
21,000
23,500
Life
10
5
8
Method
DDB
SL
DDB
Accum.
Depr.
to 2014
39,900
29,000
47,567
2015
Depr.
20,520
11,600
4,333
(a) Machine A—Testing the methods:
Straight Line Method for 2013
Straight Line Method for 2014
Total Straight Line
Double Declining Balance for 2013
= ($142,500 X .2 X .5)
Double Declining Balance for 2014
= ($142,500 - $14,250) X .2
Total Double Declining Balance
$ 6,325.00
12,650.00
$18,975.00
$14,250.00
25,650.00
$39,900.00
(b) 2015 depreciation = ($142,500 – $39,900) X .20 = $20,520
(c) and (d) Machine B—Calculation of the cost
Asset has been depreciated for 2 1/2 years using the
straight line method.
Annual depreciation is then equal to $29,000 divided by
2.5 or $11,600.
$11,600 times 5 plus the residual value is equal to the
cost
Cost is $79,000
Solutions Manual
11-25
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-5 (Continued)
(e) Machine C—Using the double-declining balance method of
depreciation
2011’s depreciation is
$ 9,425.00 (75,400 X .25 X .5)
2012’s depreciation is
16,493.75
2013’s depreciation is
12,370.31
2014’s depreciation is
9,277.73
$47,566.79
(f) Using DDB, 2015 Depreciation is $4,333.21*
*to reduce to $23,500 residual value [($75,400 – $47,566.79) =
$27,833.21 – $23,500 = $4,333.21].
NOTE: $27,833.21 x .25 = $6,958. This amount of depreciation
would reduce the carrying amount lower than the residual value.
Therefore depreciation must be limited to $4,333.21.
Solutions Manual
11-26
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-6 (15-20 minutes)
(a)
Straight-line method depreciation for each of Years 2014
through 2016 =
$387,000 – $39,000
12
(b)
= $29,000
Double-Declining Balance method
depreciation rate.
100%
12
X 2 = 16.67%
$387,000 X 16.67% =
$64,513 depreciation 2014
($387,000 – $64,513) X 16.67% =
$53,759 depreciation 2015
($387,000 – $64,513 – $53,759)
X 16.67% =
$44,797 depreciation 2016
(c)
Equipment – Input Device .............................................
55,000
Equipment – Processor .................................................
132,000
Equipment – Output Device ..........................................
200,000
Cash .......................................................................
387,000
(d)
Depreciation for 2014:
Input device ($55,000 - $5,000) / 5 =
$10,000
Processor ($132,000 - $12,000) 10 =
$12,000
Output device $200,000 X 16.67%* =
$33,340
Depreciation for 2014
$55,340
* The output device is expected to provide the greatest benefits
in the early years, therefore the double declining balance
method would be an appropriate method because the
depreciation charges are also higher in the early years.
Solutions Manual
11-27
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-7 (20-25 minutes)
(a)
Examination of the depreciation schedule under declining
balance indicates there is a residual value, as the
depreciation amount in the fourth year is truncated to an
amount less than the continuation of the series of the first
three years. When there is any residual value and the
amount is unknown (as is the case here), the cost would
have to be determined by looking at the data for the
double-declining balance method.
100%
5
= 20%; 20% X 2 = 40%
Cost X 40% = $30,000
$30,000 .40 = $75,000 Cost of asset
(b)
$75,000 cost [from (a)] – $60,000 total depreciation
= $15,000 residual value.
(c)
The lowest charge to income for Year 1 will be yielded by
the straight-line method, and this will yield the higher net
income.
(d) The highest charge to income for Year 4 will be yielded by
the straight-line method.
(e) The method that produces the highest carrying amount at the
end of Year 3 would be the method that yields the lowest
accumulated depreciation at the end of Year 3 which is the
straight-line method.
Calculations:
St.-line = $75,000 – ($12,000 + $12,000 + $12,000) = $39,000
carrying amount, end of Year 3.
D.D.B. = $75,000 – ($30,000 + $18,000 + $10,800) = $16,200
carrying amount, end of Year 3.
Solutions Manual
11-28
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-7 (Continued)
(f) Since CCA must be used for tax purposes, neither the
straight-line, nor the double-declining balance method will
impact cash flows in any of the years. Net income must be
converted to taxable income by removing the accounting
depreciation and substituting capital cost allowance.
(g) The double-declining balance method in this case: The
method that will yield the highest gain (or lowest loss) if the
asset is sold at the end of Year 3 is the method which will
yield the lowest carrying amount [see part (e)] at the end of
Year 3.
Solutions Manual
11-29
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-8 (25-35 minutes)
(a)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
(b)
2007
$192,000 – $16,800 = $175,200
$175,200 12 = $14,600
per yr. ($40 per day)
133/365 of $14,600 =
$5,320
2008-2013 incl. (6 X $14,600)
68/365 of $14,600 =
0
14,600
7,300
4/12 of $14,600
4,867
2008-2013 incl.
3/12 of $14,600
0
20082013
2014
Total
$2,720
14,600
0
7,300
$ 95,640
102,200
102,200
102,200
3,650
0
96,117
87,600
$87,600
87,600
87,600
87,600
87,600
87,600
The most accurate distribution of cost is given by methods
1 and 5 if it is assumed that straight-line is satisfactory.
Reasonable accuracy is normally given by 2, 3, or 4. The
simplest of the applications are 6, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1, in about
that order. Methods 2, 3, and 4 combine reasonable
accuracy with simplicity of application.
Solutions Manual
11-30
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-9 (10-15 minutes)
(a)
Depreciation taken (DDB): $60,000 X 40% ......................
Correct depreciation (SL): ($60,000 – $5,000) / 5 years
Overstatement of depreciation ........................................
$24,000
11,000
$13,000
The correcting entry needed is as follows:
Accumulated Depreciation–Machinery .........................
13,000
Depreciation Expense ...........................................
13,000
Calculation of corrected net income:
Net income as reported...................................................
Add: Overstatement of depreciation expense...............
Corrected net income .....................................................
$53,000
13,000
$66,000
(b) A potential investor would want to base their investment
decision on relevant and faithfully representative
information. If the error was not detected and corrected by
Gibbs, net income in 2014 would be understated, and total
assets at end of 2014 would be understated. The financial
statements would be less relevant (they would have less
predictive value), and the financial statements would not be
as faithfully representative (they would not be free from
error). As well, comparability of the financial statements with
financial statements of previous periods, would be
compromised. A potential investor might forego investing in
Gibbs, based on this understated amount of net income and
total assets.
Solutions Manual
11-31
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-10 (20-25 minutes)
(a)
Maintenance and Repairs Expense ...............................
500
Equipment .............................................................. 500
(b)
The proper ending balance in the asset account is:
January 1 balance
$134,750
Add new equipment:
Purchases
$32,000
Freight
700
Installation
2,700
35,400
Less cost of equipment sold
(23,000)
$147,150
For equipment purchased in 2012: $111,750 ($134,750 – $23,000)
of the cost of equipment purchased in 2012, is still on hand.
1. Straight-line:
$111,750 / 10 =
For equipment purchased in 2014: $35,400 / 10 =
Total
$11,175
3,540
$14,715
2. Declining-balance:
Carrying amount of the 2012 equipment:
2012: $134,750 X 20% = $26,950
2013: ($134,750 – $26,950) X 20% = $21,560
Carrying amount at end of 2013:
($134,750 – $26,950 – $21,560) = $86,240
Carrying amount of equipment sold in 2014:
($23,000 X (1–20%)2) = $14,720
Solutions Manual
11-32
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-10 (Continued)
Carrying amount of equipment at end of 2013:
($86,240* – 14,720) = $71,520
(excluding equipment sold in 2014)
$71,520 X 20% =
For equipment purchased in 2014:
$35,400 X 20% =
Total
$14,304
7,080
$21,384
* Carrying amount at end of 2013 (calculated above)
OR :
Carrying amount of remaining equipment at end of 2013:
($134,750 – $23,000) X (1–20%)2 = $71,520
Depreciation for 2014 = ($71,520 + $35,400) X 20% = $21,384
Solutions Manual
11-33
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-11 (15-20 minutes)
(a)
Depletion charge:
Depreciable Cost of Timberland:
$1,400 – $420 = $980 per hectare
Total depreciable cost: $980 X 9,000 hectares
= $8,820,000 of value of timber
Depletion Rate = ($8,820,000 3,500,000 m3) = $2.52 per m3
Depletion charge (and portion of depletion included in cost
of timber sold in 2003) = $2.52 X 700,000 m3 = $1,764,000
(b)
Cost of Timber Sold related to depletion:
$8,820,000 – $1,764,000 = $7,056,000
$7,056,000 + $100,000 = $7,156,000
($7,156,000 5,000,000 m3) X 900,000 m3 = $1,288,080
(c)
The spraying costs as well as the costs to maintain the fire
lanes and roads are expensed each period and are not part
of the depletion base. The company would record them as
follows:
Maintenance and Repairs Expense
$10,000
Cash
$10,000
(d)
The Fire Lanes and Roads would be depreciated over their
useful life. They have a physical life of 30 years. However, if
the lanes’ and roads’ useful life can be directly assigned to
the timberland and the production that is estimated to take
place over a shorter span than 30 years, the depreciation
would be calculated on a units-of-production basis over the
quantity of timber to be extracted. Since the company is
maintaining its timberland and is planting new seedlings, it
is likely that the timberland will last for more than 30 years.
Solutions Manual
11-34
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-11 (Continued)
(e)
IAS 41 Agriculture is applied to accounting for biological
assets, agricultural produce at the point of harvest, and
government grants involving biological assets measured at
fair value less costs to sell. In the case of forestry
companies, the biological assets to be measured at fair
value less costs to sell according to IAS 41 are trees in a
standing forest. IAS 41 does not deal with the processing
of agricultural produce after harvest. After the standing
timber trees have been harvested (felling), timber is
accounted for in accordance with IAS 2 Inventories. A
biological asset is measured at each balance sheet date at
its fair value less costs to sell, unless the fair value cannot
be measured reliably, in which case, the biological asset is
measured at its cost less any accumulated depletion and
any accumulated impairment losses.
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements requires
biological assets to be presented separately on the face of
an entity’s balance sheet. IFRS requires the assets of
timberland operations as presented on the balance sheet to
be separated between timber and bare land and
improvements (roads and bridges) as each falls under a
different Standard (asset componentization). IAS 41
requires that “a gain or loss arising on initial recognition of
a biological asset at fair value less costs to sell and from a
change in fair value less costs to sell of a biological asset
shall be included in profit or loss for the period in which it
arises.” IAS 41 also requires that gains and losses arising
on initial recognition of agricultural produce at fair value
less costs to sell (e.g., felled trees) shall be included in
profit or loss for the period in which it arises.
Solutions Manual
11-35
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-11 (Continued)
(e) (Continued)
With respect to asset retirement obligations (ARO) and
decommissioning costs, under Canadian ASPE (CICA
Handbook Section 3110 Asset Retirement Obligations),
only the cost of legal obligations related to site restoration
and asset retirement is capitalized. Changes in the estimate
of the cost are also capitalized in the asset. IFRS does not
have a direct equivalent to CICA 3110 Asset retirement
obligations (ARO’s), but these obligations — as well as
other kinds of environmental liabilities — fall within the
scope of IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and
Contingent Assets. The cost of legal and constructive
obligations related to asset retirement is capitalized, as
measured under IAS 37. However, increases in the cost of
the obligation related to the production of inventory are
specifically excluded (significant difference from Canadian
ASPE).
Solutions Manual
11-36
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-12 (10-15 minutes)
(a)
Inventory ..........................................................................
970,200
Accumulated Depletion .........................................970,200
Depletion cost per barrel =
$5,000,000 + $6,250,000 +
$300,000
250,000 barrels
Total depletion cost = $46.20 X 21,000
= $46.20
= $970,200
Note: The product cost would also include the annual rental of
$275,000 (a period cost) and the 5% premium.
(b)
Oil Property......................................................................
11,550,000
Cash ........................................................................ 11,250,000
Liability for Site Restoration..................................
300,000
($5,000,000 + $6,250,000 + $300,000)
Inventory ..........................................................................
364,250
Cash ........................................................................
($275,000 + [5% X $85 X 21,000 barrels])
364,250
Solutions Manual
11-37
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-13 (15-20 minutes)
(a)
Depletion base:
$850,000 + $170,000 + $40,000* – $100,000** = $960,000
*The $40,000 should be depleted because it is an asset
retirement obligation.
**The value of the land should be capitalized as a
separate asset component and not depleted.
Depletion rate: $960,000
(b)
12,000,000 = $0.08/unit
Total depletion amount - 2014:
= $0.08/unit X 2,500,000 units extracted = $200,000
Inventory..........................................................................
200,000
Accumulated Depletion .........................................
200,000
(c)
Depletion in cost of goods sold - 2014:
= $0.08/unit X 2,200,000 units sold = $176,000
Cost of Goods Sold.........................................................
176,000
Inventory.................................................................
176,000
Solutions Manual
11-38
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-14 (10-15 minutes)
(a)
No correcting entry is necessary because changes in
estimate are handled in the current and prospective
periods.
(b)
Original annual charge: ($56,000 – $4,000) ÷ 8 = $6,500
Revised annual charge:
Carrying amount as of 1/1/2014 [$56,000 – ($6,500 X 5)] =
= $23,500
Remaining useful life = 5 years (10 years – 5 years)
Revised residual value = $4,500
($23,500 – $4,500) 5 = $3,800
Depreciation Expense ....................................................
3,800
Accumulated Depreciation—
Equipment .......................................................3,800
(c)
Revised annual charge:
Old depreciation rate = (100% ÷ 8) X 2 = 25%
Carrying amount as of 1/1/2014 =
= [$56,000 X (1 – 25%)5] = $13,289
Remaining useful life = 5 years
Revised depreciation rate = (100% ÷ 5) X 2 = 40%
$13,289 X 40% = $5,316
Depreciation Expense ....................................................
5,316
Accumulated Depreciation—
Equipment .......................................................5,316
Solutions Manual
11-39
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-15 (20-25 minutes)
(a)
1986-1995: ($1,800,000 – $400,000)
(b)
1996-2013:
Building ($1,800,000 – $400,000) 40 = $35,000/yr.
Addition ($750,000 – $150,000) 30 = 20,000/yr.
$55,000/yr.
(c)
No entry required because changes in estimate are handled
in the current and prospective periods.
(d)
Revised annual depreciation
Building:
Carrying amount: ($1,800,000 – $980,000*)
Remaining useful life
Annual depreciation
$820,000
2 years
$410,000
Addition:
Carrying amount: ($750,000 – $360,000**)
Remaining useful life
Annual depreciation
$390,000
2 years
$195,000
40 = $35,000/yr.
*$35,000 X 28 years = $980,000
**$20,000 X 18 years = $360,000
Note: 30 years total useful life; 28 years have lapsed so the
unamortized balance is charged off over the two years of
remaining expected useful life. Despite the amount, this is
treated prospectively.
Annual depreciation expense:
Building ($410,000 + $195,000) = $605,000
Solutions Manual
11-40
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-15 (Continued)
(e)
The original useful life estimate would have been
management’s best estimate based on the information that
was available. However, an investor who purchased shares
in Lincoln in 2013 would have based his or her investment
decision on financial statements that show annual building
depreciation expense of $55,000/yr., when annual building
depreciation expense would have been $76,667/yr.
[($1,800,000 - $400,000) 30 + ($750,000 - $150,000) 20]
based on an original useful life of 30 years. Annual building
depreciation expense of $76,667/yr. for 28 years would
have amounted to $2,146,676 in accumulated depreciation
at end of 2013, whereas the financial statements at end of
2013 reported accumulated depreciation of $1,540,000.
Also, the investor would have invested based on the
information that the building would be useful for another 12
years (until 2025), although Lincoln will likely need to
invest in a new building within 2 years, if the company
intends to occupy a building within the same district. The
investor should also be concerned that the building should
be tested for impairment, since the value of the building on
the balance sheet is likely overstated (it is based on an
original useful life of 40 years), and there are now only 2
years of useful life remaining. Review of asset useful life at
least at each year end helps to ensure that financial
statements are prepared based on the most relevant
information available.
Solutions Manual
11-41
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-16 (15-20 minutes)
(a)
$2,800,000
40 = $70,000
(b)
Loss on Disposal of Buildings .......................................
95,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Buildings
($190,000 X 20/40) ........................................................
95,000
Buildings ................................................................
190,000
Buildings* ........................................................................
370,000
Cash ........................................................................
370,000
*Componentized asset would be capitalized separately
from the building if it had a different pattern of expected
benefits or a different useful life. In this example, it is
assumed, in the absence of additional information that the
remaining useful life of the roof is the same as the
building’s remaining useful life, and that straight-line
deprecation is appropriate.
The most appropriate entry (and as required under IFRS),
as shown is to remove the old roof and record a loss on
disposal. If the original cost is not known it would have to
be estimated.
An alternative that exists under Canadian ASPE would be
to debit Accumulated Depreciation – Buildings on the
theory that the replacement extends the useful life of the
building. The entry in this case would be as follows:
Accumulated Depreciation—Buildings .........................
370,000
Cash ........................................................................
370,000
As indicated, this approach does not seem as appropriate
as the first approach and does not provide for asset
componentization.
(c)
No entry necessary.
Solutions Manual
11-42
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-16 (Continued)
(d)
(Assume the cost of old roof is removed)
Building ($2,800,000 – $190,000 + $370,000)
Accumulated Depreciation ($70,000 X 20 –
$95,000)
Remaining useful life
Depreciation—2014 ($1,675,000
25)
$2,980,000
1,305,000
1,675,000
25 years
$ 67,000
OR
(Assume the cost of new roof is debited to
accumulated depreciation - buildings)
Carrying amount of building prior to the
replacement of roof
$2,800,000 – ($70,000 X 20) =
Cost of new roof
Remaining useful life
Depreciation—2014 ($1,770,000
25)
$1,400,000
370,000
$1,770,000
25 years
$ 70,800
Solutions Manual
11-43
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-17 (20-25 minutes)
(a)
December 31, 2014
Loss on Impairment ........................................................
270,000
Accumulated Impairment
Losses—Equipment ......................... Equipment
270,000
The recoverability test indicates that impairment has occurred
since the carrying amount ($500,000) exceeds the undiscounted
future net cash flows ($300,000). The impairment loss is then
calculated as follows:
Cost
$900,000
Accumulated depreciation
400,000
Carrying amount
500,000
Fair value
230,000
Impairment loss
$270,000
(b)
It may be reported in the other expenses and losses
section or it may be highlighted as an unusual item in a
separate section, as part of income from continuing
operations. It is not reported as an extraordinary item.
(c)
No entry necessary. Under the Cost Recovery Impairment
Model, recovery of any impairment loss is not permitted for
assets held for use or to be disposed of other than by sale.
(d)
No entry necessary. The recoverability test indicates that
impairment has not occurred since the carrying amount
($500,000) is less than the undiscounted future net cash
flows ($510,000).
Solutions Manual
11-44
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-17 (Continued)
(e) The recoverability test indicates that impairment has
occurred since the carrying amount ($500,000) exceeds the
undiscounted future net cash flows of $450,000 ($45,000 X
10 years).
Since fair value is not available, present value of the future
net cash flows is used to calculate the impairment loss:
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Carrying amount
Fair value*
Impairment loss
$900,000
400,000
500,000
276,506
$223,494
*Fair value = PV of annuity ($45,000, n = 10 years, i = 10%) =
$45,000 X 6.14457 = $276,506
Using Excel:
Payments
Interest rate
Periods
Future value
Type
$45,000
10%
10
0
0
Present value = $276,506
December 31, 2015
Loss on Impairment ........................................................
223,494
Accumulated Impairment
Losses—Equipment ......................... Equipment
223,494
(f)
The Cost Recovery Impairment Model uses undiscounted
future net cash flows in its recoverability test because the
recoverability test assesses recoverability of cost. The
asset’s original cost is compared to undiscounted future
net cash flows generated from use of the asset in future
periods.
Solutions Manual
11-45
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-18 (10-15 minutes)
When the recoverable amount of an individual asset cannot be
determined, the asset is identified with a cash-generating unit
(CGU), and the CGU’s cash flows are tested for impairment. An
individual asset is identified with a CGU, only when it does not
generate cash inflows that are largely independent of cash flows
from other assets or groups of assets, or when its fair value less
selling costs is not considered representative of its value in use.
The allocation of assets to CGU’s often involves professional
judgement.
The recoverable amount of a CGU, like the recoverable amount
of an individual asset, is the higher of its value in use and fair
value less costs of disposal (or fair value less costs to sell).
Because the recoverable amount is compared with the CGU's
carrying amount to determine if there is an impairment loss, it is
reasonable to include the same assets in both measures.
Therefore the carrying amount of a CGU includes the carrying
amount of only those assets that are used to generate the
relevant stream of cash flows. These assets can be assets that
are directly involved in the CGU, or assets that can be allocated
to the CGU on a reasonable and consistent basis. Where
liabilities are needed to calculate the recoverable amount, they
are also deducted in determining the carrying amount of the
CGU.
The road system's fair value less costs of disposal is almost
negligible; certainly far less than its value in use. Because its
recoverable amount cannot be determined independently, the
road system is assigned to the smallest identifiable group of
assets that generates independent cash inflows. The road
system’s CGU likely includes the mineral deposit and any other
site-specific assets that do not generate independent cash
inflows. The CGU's recoverable amount is the higher of its value
in use and fair value less costs of disposal.
Solutions Manual
11-46
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-19 (20-25 minutes)
(a)
Under IFRS, the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit
(CGU) is the higher of (1) value in use and (2) fair value less
costs to sell. The recoverable amount of the CGU is $108,000,
which is lower than the carrying amount of the CGU ($120,000),
therefore the CGU is impaired. The impairment loss is $12,000
($120,000 - $108,000).
The impairment loss is allocated to the individual assets in the
unit, but no individual asset is reduced to below the highest of
(1) its value in use, (2) its fair value less costs to sell, or (3) zero.
Allocation of impairment loss to assets in cash-generating unit
(CGU):
Carrying
Amount
Carrying
(before
Loss Amount (after
impairment) Proportion Allocation
impairment)
Land
$25,000
25/120
$2,500
$22,500
Building
50,000
50/120
5,000
45,000
Equipment
30,000
30/120
3,000
27,000
Trucks
15,000
15/120
1,500
13,500
$120,000
$12,000
$108,000
The journal entry to recognize the impairment loss is:
Loss on Impairment ........................................................
12,000
Land ........................................................................2,500
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Buildings ...........................................................5,000
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Equipment .........................................................3,000
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Trucks................................................................1,500
Solutions Manual
11-47
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-19 (Continued)
(b)
Since the recoverable amount of the building is determined to be
$46,000, the building cannot be reduced to below $46,000 (note
that from part (a), a true proportionate allocation would result in
building carrying amount of less than $46,000).
Allocation of impairment loss to assets in cash-generating unit
(CGU):
Carrying
Carrying
Amount
Amount
(before
Loss
(after
impairment) Proportion Allocation impairment)
Land
$25,000
*25/70
**$2,857
$22,143
Buildings
50,000
4,000
46,000
Equipment
30,000
30/70
3,428
26,572
Trucks
15,000
15/70
1,715
13,285
$120,000
$12,000
$108,000
*Allocation base = $25,000 + $30,000 + $15,000 = $70,000
**Impairment loss to allocate = $12,000 total – $4,000 allocated to
buildings = $8,000; $8,000 impairment loss to allocate X 25/70 =
$2,857 allocated to land
The journal entry to recognize the impairment loss is:
Loss on Impairment ........................................................
12,000
Land ........................................................................2,857
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Buildings ..........................................................4,000
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Equipment........................................................3,428
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Trucks ..............................................................1,715
Solutions Manual
11-48
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-19 (Continued)
(c)
Under ASPE, the asset group is impaired if its undiscounted
future net cash flows are less than its carrying amount. The
undiscounted future net cash flows are $144,000, which is
higher than the asset group’s carrying amount of $120,000.
Therefore the asset group is not impaired and no entry is
necessary.
Solutions Manual
11-49
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-20 (20-25 minutes)
(a)
Cost Recovery Impairment Model
(1)
December 31, 2014
Loss on Impairment ........................................................
1,800,000
Accumulated Impairment
Losses—Equipment ......................... Equipment
1,800,000
The recoverability test indicates that impairment has occurred
since the carrying amount exceeds the undiscounted future net
cash flows. The impairment loss is calculated as follows:
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Carrying amount
Fair value
Impairment loss
(2)
December 31, 2015
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
1,550,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Equipment .........................................................
1,550,000
New carrying amount
Useful life
Depreciation per year
(3)
$9,000,000
1,000,000
8,000,000
6,200,000
$1,800,000
$6,200,000
4 years
$1,550,000
No entry necessary. Under the Cost Recovery Impairment
Model, recovery of any impairment loss is not permitted for
assets held for use or to be disposed of other than by sale.
Solutions Manual
11-50
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-20 (Continued)
(b)
Rational Entity Impairment Model
(1)
The asset’s recoverable amount is $6,350,000 (the higher of
its value in use (i.e. discounted future net cash flows)
($6,350,000) and its fair value less costs to sell ($6,150,000).
The impairment test indicates that impairment has
occurred since the carrying amount exceeds the
recoverable amount. The impairment loss is calculated as
follows:
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Carrying amount
Recoverable amount
Impairment loss
$9,000,000
1,000,000
8,000,000
6,350,000
$1,650,000
December 31, 2014
Loss on Impairment ........................................................
1,650,000
Accumulated Impairment
Losses—Equipment ......................... Equipment
1,650,000
(2)
December 31, 2015
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
1,587,500
Accumulated Depreciation—
Equipment ..........................................................
1,587,500
New carrying amount
Useful life
Depreciation per year
$6,350,000
4 years
$1,587,500
Solutions Manual
11-51
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-20 (Continued)
(b) (Continued)
(3)
Under IAS 36, an impairment loss may be reversed,
however the specific asset cannot be increased in value to
more than what its carrying amount would have been, net
of depreciation, if the original impairment loss had never
been recognized.
December 31, 2014 pre-impairment loss
carrying amount ......................................................... $8,000,000
2015 depreciation based on pre-impairment carrying
amount ($8,000,000 ÷ 4 years) .................................. 2,000,000
December 31, 2015 pre-impairment carrying amount .. $6,000,000
The December 31, 2015 carrying amount would have been
$6,000,000 if the impairment had not occurred; this is the
maximum carrying amount which can be reflected for the
equipment in the December 31, 2015 balance sheet.
Actual December 31, 2014 carrying amount................. $6,350,000
Actual 2015 depreciation (based on impairment) .... (a) 1,587,500
Indicated December 31, 2015 carrying amount ............ 4,762,500
December 31, 2015 pre-impairment carrying amount .. 6,000,000
Recovery of previously recognized impairment ..... (b) $1,237,500
Thus, the net effect on the 2015 net income (loss) is a net
decrease of $350,000 [= (a) – (b)]. The asset cannot be
restored to its December 31, 2014 carrying amount of
$6,350,000 as this exceeds the carrying amount that would
have existed at December 31, 2015 had the impairment in
2014 never been recognized.
December 31, 2015
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Equipment ....................................................................
1,237,500
Recovery of Loss from
Impairment ..........................................................
1,237,500
Solutions Manual
11-52
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-20 (Continued)
(c)
The Cost Recovery Impairment Model compares the asset
carrying amount with its undiscounted future net cash
flows to determine if the asset is impaired. This
recoverability test does not take into account the time
value of money and delays recording of impairment loss
until impairment conditions are very bad. As a result, the
financial statements may not be as relevant or faithfully
representative. The Cost Recovery Impairment Model also
does not allow for later recovery of any impairment losses,
which is not neutral.
The Rational Entity Impairment Model better reflects the
economic conditions underlying the asset’s usefulness to
the entity, by considering the asset’s value in use (a
discounted value) as well as its fair value less costs to sell,
and by capturing both the declines and recoveries in value
of the asset.
Solutions Manual
11-53
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-21 (15-20 minutes)
(a)
Cost Recovery Impairment Model
(1)
Loss on Impairment ........................................................
1,850,000
Accumulated Impairment
Losses—Equipment ......................... Equipment
1,850,000
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Carrying amount
Less: Fair value
Plus: Costs of disposal
Impairment loss
$9,000,000
1,000,000
8,000,000
(6,200,000)
50,000
$1,850,000
Held for sale assets are valued
at fair value less costs to sell.
(2)
No entry necessary. Depreciation not taken on assets held
for sale.
(3)
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Equipment ....................................................................
300,000
Recovery of Loss from
Impairment ..........................................................
300,000
Fair value
$6,500,000
Less: Costs of disposal
50,000
Carrying amount*
Recovery of loss from impairment
*($9,000,000 – $1,000,000 – $1,850,000)
(4)
6,450,000
6,150,000
$300,000
The equipment would be shown in a separate section of the
statement of financial position as a non-current asset held
for sale. It would be shown at the lower of its carrying
amount and fair value less costs to sell.
Solutions Manual
11-54
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-21 (Continued)
(b)
Rational Entity Impairment Model
(1)
Same as E11-21 (a).
(2)
No entry necessary. Depreciation not taken on assets held
for sale.
(3)
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Equipment ....................................................................
300,000
Recovery of Loss from
Impairment ..........................................................
300,000
Fair value
$6,500,000
Less: Costs of disposal
50,000
Carrying amount*
Recovery of impairment loss
*($9,000,000 – $1,000,000 – $1,850,000)
(4)
6,450,000
6,150,000
$ 300,000
The equipment would be shown in a separate section of the
statement of financial position as a current asset held for
sale. It would be shown at the lower of its carrying amount
and its fair value less costs to sell.
Solutions Manual
11-55
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-22 (20-25 minutes)
Old Machine
June 1, 2010 Purchase
Freight
Installation
Total cost
Annual depreciation charge: ($32,600 – $1,900)
$31,800
300
500
$32,600
10 = $3,070
On June 1, 2011, debit the old machine for the cost of the
new part of $1,980; the revised total cost is $34,580 ($32,600
+ $1,980); thus the revised annual depreciation charge is:
($34,580 – $1,900 – $3,070) 9 = $3,290.
Carrying amount, old machine, June 1, 2014:
[$34,580 – $3,070 – ($3,290 X 3)] =
Fair value
Loss on disposal
Costs of removal
Total loss
$21,640
19,000
2,640
75
$ 2,715
New Machine
Basis of new machine
Cash paid ($35,000 – $19,000)
Fair market value of old machine
Installation cost
Total cost of new machine
$16,000
19,000
1,300
$36,300
Depreciation for the year beginning June 1, 2014
= ($36,300 – $4,000) 10 = $3,230.
Solutions Manual
11-56
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-23 (20-25 minutes)
(a) Situation 1
(1) December 31, 2014
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
18,000
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment ...........................................................
18,000
($100,000 – $10,000) ÷ 5 years
The equipment is reported on the statement of financial position
at a carrying amount of $82,000 ($100,000 less accumulated
depreciation of $18,000).
(2) December 31, 2015
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
18,000
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment ..........................................................
18,000
($100,000 – $10,000) ÷ 5 years
The equipment is reported on the statement of financial position
at a carrying amount of $64,000 ($100,000 less accumulated
depreciation of $36,000).
(3) March 31, 2016
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
4,500
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment ........................................................... 4,500
($100,000 – $10,000) ÷ 5 years X 3/12
Cash .................................................................................
62,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Equipment 40,500
*Gain on Disposal of Equipment........................... 2,500
Equipment ..............................................................
100,000
*Per IAS 16, the gain or loss on disposal (the difference
between the carrying amount and the proceeds on
disposal) is reported on the income statement. Any
amount remaining in the Revaluation Surplus account
would be transferred directly to retained earnings.
Solutions Manual
11-57
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-23 (Continued)
(b) Situation 2
(1) December 31, 2014
Depreciation Expense .....................................................
18,000
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment ............................................................18,000
($100,000 – $10,000) ÷ 5 years
Accumulated Depreciation – Equipment........................
18,000
Equipment ...............................................................18,000
Equipment
7,000
Revaluation Surplus (OCI)..................................... 7,000
The equipment is reported on the statement of financial position
at a carrying amount of $89,000 (gross amount of $89,000 less
accumulated depreciation of $0).
Note: This is a two step process. First, depreciation is recorded
for the period according to normal depreciation principles.
Second, the asset revaluation is recorded. Using the elimination
method, accumulated depreciation is eliminated against the
asset account just prior to revaluation of the asset to fair value.
(2) December 31, 2015
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
19,500
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment ...........................................................
19,500
($89,000 – $11,000) ÷ 4 years
The equipment is reported on the statement of financial position
at a carrying amount of $69,500 ($89,000 less accumulated
depreciation of $19,500).
Solutions Manual
11-58
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-23 (Continued)
(3) March 31, 2016
Depreciation Expense .........................................................
4,875
Accumulated Depreciation Equipment .......................................................................
4,875
($89,000 – $11,000) ÷ 4 years X 3/12
Cash .................................................................................
62,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Equipment............................
24,375
Loss on Disposal of Equipment* ........................................
2,625
Equipment .......................................................................
89,000
*Per IAS 16, the gain or loss on disposal (the difference
between the carrying amount and the proceeds on disposal)
is reported on the income statement. The remaining balance
in the Revaluation Surplus account is now transferred
directly to Retained Earnings:
Debit:
Credit:
AOCI
7,000
Retained Earnings
7,000
Solutions Manual
11-59
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-23 (Continued)
c) Situation 2
(1) December 31, 2014
Depreciation Expense .....................................................
18,000
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment ............................................................18,000
($100,000 – $10,000) ÷ 5 years
Equipment
Acc. Dep’n.
Carrying amount
Before
revaluation
$100,000
18,000
$ 82,000
x 89/82
x 89/82
x 89/82
Proportional
after
revaluation
$108,537
19,537
$ 89,000
Equipment .......................................................................
8,537
Accumulated Depreciation 1,537
Equipment ............................................................
Revaluation Surplus (OCI)..................................... 7,000
The equipment is reported on the statement of financial position
at a carrying amount of $89,000 (gross amount of $108,537 less
accumulated depreciation of $19,537).
Note: This is a two step process. First, depreciation is recorded
for the period according to normal depreciation principles.
Second, the asset revaluation is recorded. Using the
proportional method, both the asset account and accumulated
depreciation are adjusted so that the net carrying amount is
equal to the new valuation.
(2) December 31, 2015
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
19,500
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment ...........................................................
19,500
($89,000 – $11,000) ÷ 4 years
Solutions Manual
11-60
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-23 (Continued)
The equipment is reported on the statement of financial position
at a carrying amount of $69,500 ($108,537 less accumulated
depreciation of $39,037).
(3) March 31, 2016
Depreciation Expense .........................................................
4,875
Accumulated Depreciation Equipment .......................................................................
4,875
($89,000 – $11,000) ÷ 4 years X 3/12
Cash .................................................................................
62,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Equipment............................
43,912
Loss on Disposal of Equipment* ........................................
2,625
Equipment .......................................................................
108,537
*Per IAS 16, the gain or loss on disposal (the difference
between the carrying amount and the proceeds on disposal)
is reported on the income statement.
The remaining
balance in the Revaluation Surplus account is transferred
directly to Retained Earnings:
Debit:
Credit:
AOCI
7,000
Retained Earnings
7,000
Solutions Manual
11-61
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-24 (10-15 minutes)
Situation 1
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
2,700
Accumulated Depreciation—
Equipment ...........................................................
($120,000 – $12,000) ÷ 10 X 3/12 = $2,700
Cash ................................................................................
28,000
Loss on Disposal of Equipment .....................................
13,700
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment
($75,600 + $2,700)............................................................
78,300
Equipment ..............................................................
Situation 2
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
1,750
Accumulated Depreciation—
Machinery ............................................................
($38,000 – $2,000) ÷ 12 X 7/12 = $1,750
Cash ................................................................................
10,000
Loss on Disposal of Machinery .....................................
2,250
Accumulated Depreciation—Machinery
($24,000* + $1,750) ..........................................................
25,750
Machinery ...............................................................
*Accumulated depreciation to December
31, 2013 is ($38,000 – $2,000) ÷ 12 X 8 yrs
= $24,000
Situation 3
Cash ................................................................................
5,200
Accumulated Depreciation—Office
Equipment ..................................................................
8,500
Office Equipment ...................................................
Gain on Disposal of Equipment ............................
2,700
120,000
1,750
38,000
12,000
1,700
Solutions Manual
11-62
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-25 (20-25 minutes)
(a)
Depreciation Expense (8/12 X $60,000) .........................
40,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Machinery ............................................................40,000
Loss on Disposal of Machinery** ...................................
470,000
($1,300,000 – $400,000 – $430,000)
Cash .................................................................................
430,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Machinery .....................................................................
400,000*
Machinery ...............................................................
1,300,000
*($360,000 + $40,000)
** Under both ASPE and IFRS, the loss might be classified
as unusual, and would be included in profit or loss for the
period.
(b)
Depreciation Expense (3/12 X $60,000) .........................
15,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Machinery ............................................................15,000
Cash .................................................................................
1,040,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Machinery ....................................................................
375,000
($360,000 + $15,000)
Machinery ...............................................................
1,300,000
Gain on Sale of Machinery ....................................
115,000*
*($1,040,000 – $1,300,000 – $375,000)
Solutions Manual
11-63
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-25 (Continued)
(c)
Depreciation Expense (7/12 X $60,000) .........................
35,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Machinery ...........................................................35,000
Contribution Expenses ...................................................
1,100,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Machinery .....................................................................
395,000
($360,000 + $35,000)
Machinery ...............................................................
1,300,000
Gain on Disposal of Machinery .............................195,000*
*($1,100,000 –$1,300,000 – $395,000)
Solutions Manual
11-64
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-26 (10-15 minutes)
(a)
April 1 Cash .................................................................................
460,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Buildings .....................................................................
165,000
Land ........................................................................
60,000
Buildings .................................................................
280,000
Gain on Disposal of
Land and Buildings ............................................
285,000
($280,000 – $165,000 = $115,000;
$115,000 + $60,000 = $175,000;
$460,000 – $175,000 = $285,000
gain)
Aug. 1 Land .................................................................................
160,000
Buildings ..........................................................................
410,000
Cash ........................................................................
570,000
(b)
Under both ASPE and IFRS, the gain might be classified as
unusual, and would be included in profit or loss for the
period.
(c)
Depreciation Expense .....................................................
3,750 *
Accumulated Depreciation—
Buildings ............................................................ 3,750
* ($410,000 - $230,000) / 20 X 5/12
Solutions Manual
11-65
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
EXERCISE 11-27 (15-25 minutes)
1. Asset turnover ratio:
$3,374,463
= 3.63 times
($1,071,348 + $787,167) / 2
2. Rate of return on assets:
$66,234
= 7.13%
($1,071,348 + $787,167) / 2
3. Profit margin on sales:
$66,234
$3,374,463
(b)
= 1.96%
The asset turnover ratio times the profit margin on sales
provides the rate of return on assets, calculated for Trocchi
Inc. as follows:
Profit margin
on sales
1.96%
X
X
Asset Turnover
3.63
=
Return on
Assets
7.11%
Note that the result of 7.11% would be identical to the rate
of return on assets calculated in (b) above of 7.13%, if the
ratios used in the (b) calculation had not been rounded to 2
decimal places.
(c)
The company has a low profit margin at 1.96% of revenues.
The asset turnover shows that the company generates
$3.63 of revenue for each dollar of assets. The efficiencies
in the use of assets to generate revenues combined with
the profit margin provide a reasonable rate of return on
dollars invested in assets of 7.13%. The conclusion that the
ROI is reasonable must be tempered by an evaluation
relative to other firms operating in the same industry as
well as general economic conditions.
Solutions Manual
11-66
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
*EXERCISE 11-28 (10-15 minutes)
(a)
($136,400 – $14,200)
= $20,367/year
6
= $20,367 X 5/12 = $8,486
2014 Depreciation — Straight line = $8,486
(b)
($136,400 – $14,200)
= $6.789/hr.
18,000
2014 Depreciation — Machine Usage
= 800 X $6.789 = $5,431
(c)
Rate:
100% = 16.67%; 16.67% X 2 = 33.33%
6
2014: 33.33% X ($136,400) X 5/12 = $18,943
2015: 33.33% X ($136,400 – $18,943) = $39,148
(d)
2014: ($136,400) X 25% X 1/2 = $17,050
2015: ($136,400 – $17,050) X 25% = $29,838
Solutions Manual
11-67
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
*EXERCISE 11-29 (15-20 minutes)
(a)
Proceeds of sale
Cost
Capital gain (excess of
proceeds over cost)
Beginning UCC
Disposal (lesser of cost and
proceeds of sale)
UCC, before CCA
Recapture*
Terminal loss**
(1)
$132,700
129,500
(2)
$51,000
129,500
(3)
$22,000
129,500
$3,200
$0
$0
$37,450
$37,450
$37,450
129,500
(92,050)
$92,050
51,000
(13,550)
$13,550
22,000
15,450
$15,450
*Recapture occurs if UCC has a negative balance.
**Terminal loss occurs if a positive balance remains in the class
after the appropriate reduction is made to the class from the
disposal of the last asset.
(b)
Laiken could reduce the taxes payable on recapture by
reducing or not claiming CCA in the years prior to the
disposal of the asset. In those years, the tax rate would be
lower and the reduction of CCA would trigger taxes
payable at lower tax rates than the tax rate in 2014 on the
recapture. This must be balanced against consideration of
the time value of money, in that an earlier claim for an
expense may offset the difference in rates – and
uncertainty as to future proceeds of sale would lead most
companies to claim the CCA when the entitlement arises.
Solutions Manual
11-68
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
*EXERCISE 11-30 (15-20 minutes)
(a)
Depreciation for financial reporting purposes:
2014: $31,000 X 40% =
$12,400
2015: ($31,000 – $12,400) X 40% =
$7,440
2016: ($31,000 – $12,400 – $7,440) X 40% = $4,464
(b)
Class 10, 30%:
Beginning UCC, Jan. 1, 2014
Addition
UCC, before CCA
Less ½ net addition
UCC, for CCA purposes
CCA, 30%
Add back ½ net additions
UCC, Dec. 31, 2014
UCC
$0
$31,000
31,000
(15,500)
15,500
(4,650)
10,850
15,500
$26,350
UCC, Jan. 1, 2015
CCA, 30%
UCC, Dec. 31, 2015
$7,905
$26,350
(7,905)
$18,445
$5,534
$18,445
(5,534)
$12,911
UCC, Jan. 1, 2016
CCA, 30%
UCC, Dec. 31, 2016
(c)
CCA
$4,650
Depreciation deducted on financial statements for period
2014 – 2016: ($12,400 + $7,440 + $4,464) = $24,304.
CCA deducted to determine taxable income for period
2014- 2016: ($4,650 + $7,905 + $5,534) = $18,089.
Carrying amount of computer equipment on December 31,
2016 = $31,000 – $24,304 = $6,696.
Tax value of computer equipment on December 31, 2016 =
$31,000 – $18,089 = $12,911.
Solutions Manual
11-69
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
TIME AND PURPOSE OF PROBLEMS
Problem 11-1 (Time 25-35 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to calculate depreciation
expense using a number of different depreciation methods, as well as capital cost
allowance. The problem is complicated because the proper cost of the machine
to be depreciated must be determined. For example, purchase discounts and
freight charges must be considered. In addition, the student is asked to select a
depreciation method that will allocate less depreciation in the early years of the
machine’s life than in the later years and to discuss cash flow implications.
Problem 11-2
(Time 25-35 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to calculate depreciation
expense using the following methods: straight-line, units-of-output, working
hours, declining balance, and CCA. The student is also required to calculate the
carrying amount under the five different methods. The problem is straightforward
and provides an excellent review of the basic computational issues involving
depreciation methods.
Problem 11-3
(Time 30-45 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with a problem where depreciation is taken on
only half a year for assets acquired or disposed of during the current year. In
addition, the student is required to record a number of accounting transactions
during the year affecting the machinery account, such as exchanges, minor
repairs, replacements, and rearrangement and reinstallation costs.
Problem 11-4
(Time 25-35 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to compute depreciation
expense using a number of different depreciation methods and capital cost
allowance. The student has to determine which method will result in the
maximization of net income over a three-year period. An excellent problem for
reviewing the fundamentals of depreciation accounting.
Solutions Manual
11-70
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
TIME AND PURPOSE OF PROBLEMS (CONTINUED)
Problem 11-5
(Time 30-45 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to calculate depreciation
expense using a number of different depreciation methods. Before the proper
depreciation expense can be calculated, the accounts must be corrected for a
number of errors made by the company in its accounting for the assets. An
excellent problem for reviewing the proper accounting for plant assets and
related depreciation expense.
Problem 11-6
(Time 45-60 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to correct the improper
accounting for trucks and determine the proper depreciation expense. The
student is required to calculate separately the errors arising in determining or
entering depreciation or in recording transactions affecting trucks.
Problem 11-7
(Time 60-70 minutes)
Purpose—to have the student demonstrate the ability to analyze the
consequences of the selection of depreciation methods. The student is to
determine the results of using different combinations of depreciation methods on
net income, total assets, current ratio, long-term debt to total assets ratio, and
rate of return on total assets. Then a recommendation must be made as to which
combination satisfies various concerns of the shareholder. These concerns
reflect contractual commitments with suppliers and a bank, bonus payment to an
employee, and desire to make the business attractive to potential investors. The
student is also required to discuss the ethical issues involved in selecting a
depreciation method to satisfy user constraints.
Problem 11-8
(Time 25-30 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to analyze the components
of a large asset and determine the appropriate depreciation method for each
component. The student is required to calculate and record depreciation expense
for each asset component.
Solutions Manual
11-71
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
TIME AND PURPOSE OF PROBLEMS (CONTINUED)
Problem 11-9
(Time 25-30 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with a problem involving the calculation of
estimated depletion and depreciation costs associated with a tract of mineral
land. The student must calculate depletion and depreciation on a units-ofproduction basis (tonnes mined). A portion of the cost of machinery associated
with the product must be allocated over different periods. The depreciable cost
base must also be calculated and includes future site restoration costs,
development costs and exploration costs. The student may experience some
difficulty with this problem.
Problem 11-10
(Time 25-30 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with a problem involving the proper accounting
for depletion cost. This problem involves timber land for which a depletion charge
must be calculated. In addition, a calculation of a loss that occurs because of
volcanic activity must be determined.
Problem 11-11
(Time 25-35 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with a comprehensive problem related to
property, plant, and equipment. The student must determine depreciable bases
for assets, including capitalized interest, and prepare depreciation entries using
various methods of depreciation.
Problem 11-12
(Time 25-35 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to analyze impairments for
assets to be used and assets to be disposed of. Different situations involving
plans for sale are considered.
Problem 11-13
(Time 35-40 minutes)
Purpose—to provide a problem involving the method of handling the disposition
of certain properties. The dispositions include an expropriation, demolition, tradein, contribution and sale to a shareholder. The problem therefore involves a
number of situations and provides a good overview of the accounting treatment
accorded property dispositions.
Solutions Manual
11-72
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
TIME AND PURPOSE OF PROBLEMS (CONTINUED)
Problem 11-14
(Time 45-60 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to solve a complex problem
involving a number of plant assets. A number of depreciation calculations must
be made, specifically straight-line, 150% declining balance and double declining
balance. In addition, the cost of assets acquired is difficult to determine.
Problem 11-15
(Time 45-60 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with the opportunity to solve a complex problem
involving three different situations. The student must determine the depreciation
bases, including present value calculations, and prepare depreciation entries
using straight-line and units of production methods for full periods and for partial
periods, as well as revision of depreciation amounts. The student must also
prepare entries for note payable accruals and payments.
*Problem 11-16 (Time 25-35 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to calculate capital cost
allowance. An excellent problem for reviewing the fundamentals of capital cost
allowance.
*Problem 11-17 (Time 25-35 minutes)
Purpose—to provide the student with a problem related to government
assistance and its impact on depreciation. The student is required to account for
government assistance under the cost reduction and deferred credit approaches.
The tax value of the asset must also be calculated.
Solutions Manual
11-73
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
PROBLEM 11-1
(a)
1.
Depreciation Base Calculation:
Purchase price
Less: Purchase discount (2%)
Freight-in
Installation
Less: Residual value
Depreciation base
Straight line —2014: ($86,400
2015: ($86,400
2.
*(b)
(c)
$85,000
(1,700)
800
3,800
87,900
1,500
$86,400
8 years) X 8/12 = $7,200
8 years) = $10,800
Double-declining balance for 2014:
($87,900 X 25% X 8/12) = $14,650
DDB for 2015: ($87,900 – $14,650) X 25% = $18,313
CCA for 2014: $87,900 X 25% X ½ = $10,988
CCA for 2015: ($87,900 – $10,988) X 25% = $19,228
An activity method. These methods allocate the
depreciation base based on actual usage of the asset over
its estimated useful life measured, for example, in units of
output. In years where production is low, depreciation
expense will also be low and in years of high production,
depreciation expense will be high. This will match the
depreciation expense with the decline in benefits the
equipment has to offer.
Solutions Manual
11-74
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-1 (Continued)
If the asset benefits are actually delivered as the asset is
used, this would be an appropriate basis for the
depreciation calculations. An example of this is when
equipment deteriorates through wear and tear associated
with use. However, if the asset deteriorates on another
basis, such as on the basis of time, this would not be an
appropriate method. In this latter case, depreciation should
be recognized equally over time (straight line method) even
if the asset is not being used. The primary concern is not
how the revenues are earned, but rather with the pattern in
which the physical capacity, wear and tear, technical
obsolescence, or legal life are used up as the asset is
available to the entity.
Solutions Manual
11-75
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-1 (Continued)
(d)
The selection of a depreciation method for financial
reporting purposes has no impact on cash flows. Cash
flows would be the same regardless of the depreciation
method selected. Phoenix Corp. would therefore have the
same amount of cash in order to repay its debt. If
Phoenix’s creditors use ratios as part of the debt
agreements, the depreciation method that helps Phoenix
meet its debt covenants would be preferable. For example,
an activity method would yield a lower debt to total assets
ratio in the early years since the asset’s carrying amount
would be higher compared to the company’s debt. It would
also produce a higher profit margin since the depreciation
expense would be lower in the early years. Creditors
however are usually not fooled by the selection of
depreciation methods and would concentrate on the
company’s debt repayment ability as demonstrated by
cash flows. Creditors would be aware of management’s
choice of depreciation method by reading the note to the
financial statements on the topic of accounting policies.
(e)
The depreciation period ends when the asset is
derecognized, or when it is classified as held for sale.
Depreciation continues even if the asset is idle or has been
taken out of service. In this case, the depreciation period
ends on September 15, 2016, when the asset meets all
criteria for classification as held for sale.
DDB —2016: ($87,900 – $14,650 – $18,313) X 25% X 8.5/12
= $9,728
Solutions Manual
11-76
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
(f)
PROBLEM 11-2
(a)
Depreciation Base Calculation:
Purchase price
Overhaul
Direct material
Direct labour
$77,000
5,200
400
800
83,400
5,000
$78,400
Less: Residual value
Depreciation base
Year
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
Year
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
Straight- Activity – based on output
Activity – based on
line
input
Dep’n.
Units
Dep’n.
Hours of
Dep’n.
expense produced
expense
operation expense
1
2
5,880
110,000
7,183
10,000
7,8403
15,680
270,000
17,631
20,000
15,680
15,680
264,000
17,239
20,000
15,680
15,680
310,000
20,243
20,000
15,680
15,680
134,000
8,750
18,000
14,112
9,800
112,000
7,354
12,000
9,408
$78,400
1,200,000
$78,400
100,000
$78,400
Declining Balance
Ending
Dep’n.
Carrying
expense Amount
12,5104
70,890
28,356
42,534
17,014
25,520
10,208
15,312
6,125
9,187
4,187
5,000
$78,400
C.C.A.
C.C.A
8,3405
15,012
12,010
9,608
7,686
Ending
U.C.C.
75,060
60,048
48,038
38,430
30,744
(see item 5)
$52,656
Solutions Manual
11-77
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-2 (Continued)
1. Straight-line:
$78,400 5 = $15,680/yr.
2011: $15,680 X 4.5/12 = $5,880
2012-2015: $15,680/yr.
2016: $15,680 X 7.5/12 = $9,800
2. Units-of-output:
$78,400 1,200,000 units = $.0653/unit
2011: $.0653 X 110,000 = $7,183
2012: $.0653 X 270,000 = $17,631
2013: $.0653 X 264,000 = $17,239
2014: $.0653 X 310,000 = $20,243
2015: $.0653 X 134,000 = $8,750
2016: $.0653 X 112,000 = $7,354*
* rounded to bring carrying amount equal to residual value
3. Working hours:
$78,400 100,000 hrs. = $.784/hr.
2011: $.784 X 10,000 = $ 7,840
2012: $.784 X 20,000 = $15,680
2013: $.784 X 20,000 = $15,680
2014: $.784 X 20,000 = $15,680
2015: $.784 X 18,000 = $14,112
2016: $.784 X 12,000 = $ 9,408
4. Double-declining balance:
2011: $83,400 X 2/5 X 4.5/12 = $12,510
2012: ($83,400 – $12,510) X 2/5 = $28,356
2013: ($70,890 – $28,356) X 2/5 = $17,014
2014: ($42,534 – $17,014) X 2/5 = $10,208
2015: ($25,520 – $10,208) X 2/5 = $6,125
2016: ($9,187 – $5,000) = $4,187
to bring carrying amount equal to residual value
Solutions Manual
11-78
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-2 (Continued)
*5. Capital cost allowance:
2011: $83,400 X 20% X 1/2 = $8,340
2012: ($83,400 – $8,340) X 20% = $15,012
2013: ($75,060 – $15,012) X 20% = $12,010
2014: ($60,048 – $12,010) X 20% = $9,608
2015: ($48,038 – $9,608) X 20% = $7,686
2016: no CCA is calculated in the last year because disposal
is assumed. On disposal, if no other assets remain in
the class, a terminal loss or recapture is triggered. If other
assets remain in the class, the CCA continues as part of the
class: ($38,430 - $7,686) X 20% = $6,149
(b)
1. Straight-line = $83,400 – $5,880 – (3 X $15,680) = $30,480
2. Activity method: output = $83,400 – $7,183 – $17,631 –
$17,239 – $20,243 = $21,104
3. Activity method: input = $83,400 – $7,840 – (3 X $15,680)
= $28,520
4. Declining balance: $83,400 – $12,510 – $28,356 –
$17,014 – $10,208 = $15,312
(c)
The asset’s tax value on October 31, 2014 is $38,430.
(d)
If management determines before the end of useful life that
the hours of operation or units produced do not
correspond to the original estimates, then an adjustment to
the original estimate or total hours of operation or units
produced would be applied prospectively and a new
depreciation rate would be calculated. If the discrepancy is
not determined until the end of its useful life, then
depreciation in the last year is adjusted to achieve carrying
amount equal to residual value.
Solutions Manual
11-79
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-3
(Note to instructor: All depreciation for the year is entered on
December 31, therefore, none is entered at the time of disposal.)
(a)
January 15
Accumulated Depreciation—Machinery
($9,600 X 10% x 7)
6,720
Cash
600
Loss on Disposal of Machinery
2,280
Machinery
9,600
(Accumulated Depreciation ½ yr. + 6 yrs. + ½ yr. = 7 yrs.)
February 27
Machinery
12,500
Accumulated Depreciation—Machinery
($5,500 + $5,740)
11,240
Cash
9,000
Machinery ($5,500 + $8,200)
13,700
Gain on Disposal of Machinery
1,040
(Accumulated Depreciation: Machine #12—10 yrs.; $5,500
Machine #27— 6 yrs. + ½ yr. + ½ yr.;
$8,200 X 10% X 7 = $5,740)
April 7
Machinery
Cash
940
940
April 12
Maintenance and Repairs Expense
Cash
720
720
July 22
Cash
Accumulated Depreciation—Machinery*
Gain on Disposal of Machinery
Machinery
3,100
7,440
540
10,000
Solutions Manual
11-80
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-3 (Continued)
*Accumulated Depreciation
No. 25: (1/2 + 7 + 1/2)/10 X $4,000 =
No. 26: (1/2 + 7 + 1/2)/10 X $3,200 =
No. 41: (1/2 + 5 + 1/2)/10 X $2,800 =
(b)
Depreciation for the year:
On machinery in use all year:
Balance of Machinery Acc. 1/1/11
Deduct:
Machine No. 12, fully depreciated
Machine No. 38, scrapped
Machine No. 27, traded in
Machine No. 25, 26, 41 sold
In use all year
$3,200
2,560
1,680
$7,440
$172,300
$ 5,500
9,600
8,200
10,000
Depreciation expense = $139,000 X 10%
On machinery in use part of year:
Machine No. 38, scrapped
Machine No. 27, traded in
Machine No. 25, 26, 41 sold
Machine No. 81, purchased
Elec. Control equip. purchased
Used part of year
(33,300)
$139,000
$13,900
$ 9,600
8,200
10,000
12,500
940
$41,240
Depreciation expense = $41,240 X 10% X 1/2
Total depreciation expense
2,062
$15,962
December 31
Depreciation Expense
15,962
Accumulated Depreciation—Machinery
15,962
Solutions Manual
11-81
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-4
(a)
The straight-line method would provide the highest total
net income for financial reporting over the three years, as it
reports the lowest total depreciation expense. These
computations are provided below.
Computations of depreciation expense
depreciation under various assumptions:
1.
and
accumulated
Straight-line:
$1,100,000 – $50,000
= $210,000
5 years
Year
2012
2013
2014
2.
Depreciation
Expense
Accumulated Depreciation
$210,000
210,000
210,000
$630,000
$ 210,000
$ 420,000
$ 630,000
Double-declining balance:
Year
2012
2013
2014
Depreciation
Expense
$440,000
264,000
158,400
$862,400
Accumulated
Depreciation
(40% X $1,100,000)
(40% X $660,000)
(40% X $396,000)
$ 440,000
$ 704,000
$ 862,400
Solutions Manual
11-82
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-4 (Continued)
3.
Units-of-output:
Year
Depreciation
Expense
2012
2013
2014
$252,000
($21* X 12,000)
231,000
($21 X 11,000)
210,000
($21 X 10,000)
$693,000
*$1,050,000 50,000 = $21 per unit
(b)
$ 252,000
$ 483,000
$ 693,000
Capital cost allowance (CCA):
Year
2012
2013
2014
(c)
Accumulated
Depreciation
CCA
$165,000 ($1,100,000 X 30% X 1/2)
280,500 ($935,000 X 30%)
196,350 ($654,500 X 30%)
$641,850
UCC
$ 935,000
$ 654,500
$ 458,150
The units-of-output method would best reflect the benefits
provided by the equipment. This method matches the
expense to the output generated from the machine and to
the revenue generated by the machine. Since the machine
is used to manufacture machine tools, the depreciation of
the machine would be a component of the product cost.
For this purpose, the units-of-output would produce a cost
pattern for the product that reflects the volume of tools
produced and best reflects the contribution of the machine
to the manufacture of the product.
Solutions Manual
11-83
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-5
(a)
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation—Asset A
($46,000 – $3,900) ÷ 10
Accumulated Depreciation—Asset A
($21,050 + $4,210)
Loss on Disposal of Assets
Asset A ($46,000 – $16,500)
4,210
4,210
25,260
4,240
29,500
(b)
Depreciation Expense
10,080
Accumulated Depreciation—Asset B
10,080
([$58,000 – $4,450] 17,000 X 3,200)
(c)
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation—Asset C
([$68,000 – $12,000 – $8,000] 10)
(d)
(e)
Asset E
Retained Earnings
4,800
4,800
31,000
31,000
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation—Asset E
($31,000 – $0) X 20%
6,200
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation—Asset D
($73,000 – $26,280) x 20%
9,344
6,200
9,344
Solutions Manual
11-84
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
(2,500)
Sale of Truck #1
Depreciation
Balances
Purchase of Truck #6
Disposal of Truck #4
Depreciation
Balances
Depreciation
Balances
1/1/12
12/31/12
12/31/12
7/1/13
7/1/13
12/31/13
12/31/13
12/31/14
12/31/14
Total understatement
of income
36,000
Depreciation
Balances
12/31/11
12/31/11
________
$139,000
139,000
________
________
105,500
(3,500)
________
109,000
15,000
Purchase Truck #5
Trade Truck #3
7/1/11
(27,800)
$(123,850)
(96,050)
(24,450)
(21,100)
(71,600)
(20,300)
(50,500)
$(30,200)
$ 94,000
Balance
1/1/11
Acc. Dep. Trucks dr.
(cr.)
Trucks dr.
(cr.)
$92,950
_______
$92,000
92,000
$23,750
$27,800
$27,800
_______
(24,000)
36,000
_______
80,000
(18,000)
_______
98,000
34,000
(30,000)
$94,000
Trucks dr.
(cr.)
24,450
$ (700)
$21,100
$21,100
$20,300
$20,300
Retained
Earnings
dr. (cr.)
Per Company Books
(14,000)
$(56,600)
(42,600)
(15,000)
14,400
(16,000)
(42,000)
14,400
(19,200)
(40,400)
9,000
$(30,200)
Acc. Dep. Trucks dr.
(cr.)
As Adjusted
100
$72,700
$14,000
$14,000
$21,400
15,000
$ 6,400
16,000
$16,100
$
19,200
$21,200
$ 2,000
Retained
Earnings
dr. (cr.)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
100
$(20,250)
$(13,800)
$(13,800)
$ (2,350)
(9,450)
$ 7,100
(5,100)
$(5,000)
$
(1,100)
$ 900
$ 2,000
Net Income
Overstated
(Understated)
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-6
Solutions Manual
11-85
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-6 (Continued)
1
Implied fair value of Truck #3
($34,000 – $15,000)
Carrying amount of Truck #3
[$30,000 – ($30,000/5 X 1 ½ yrs.)]
= $30,000 – $9,000
Loss on trade
2
Truck #1:
Truck #2:
Truck #3:
Truck #4:
Truck #5:
Total
$18,000/5
$22,000/5
$30,000/5 X ½
$24,000/5
$34,000/5 X ½
=
=
=
=
=
= $19,000
= 21,000
$ 2,000
$3,600
4,400
3,000
4,800
3,400
$19,200
3
Carrying amount of Truck #1
[$18,000 – ($18,000/5 X 4 yrs.)]
= $18,000 – $14,400
Cash received on sale
Loss on sale
4
Truck #2:
Truck #4:
Truck #5:
Total
$22,000/5
$24,000/5
$34,000/5
=
=
=
= $3,600
= 3,500
$ 100
$4,400
4,800
6,800
$16,000
5
Carrying amount of Truck #4
[$24,000 – ($24,000/5 X 3 yrs.)]
= $24,000 – $14,400
Cash received ($700 + $2,500)
Loss on disposal
6
Truck #2:
Truck #4:
Truck #5:
Truck #6:
Total
$22,000/5 X 1/2
$24,000/5 X 1/2
$34,000/5
$36,000/5 X 1/2
=
=
=
=
= $9,600
= 3,200
$6,400
$ 2,200
2,400
6,800
3,600
$15,000
Solutions Manual
11-86
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-6 (Continued)
7
Truck #2:
Truck #5:
Truck #6:
Total
(b)
(fully depr.)
$34,000/5
$36,000/5
=
=
=
$
0
6,800
7,200
$14,000
Compound journal entry Dec. 31, 2014:
Accumulated Depreciation - Trucks
Trucks
Retained Earnings
Depreciation Expense
($27,800 – $14,000)
67,250
47,000
6,450
13,800
Summary of Adjustments:
Per
Books
$139,000
$123,850
Trucks
Accum. Depreciation
Prior Years’ Income
Retained Earnings, 2011 $ 20,300
Retained Earnings, 2012
21,100
Retained Earnings, 2013
23,750
Totals
$ 65,150
Depr. Expense, 2014
$ 27,800
As
Adjusted
$92,000
$56,600
$21,200
16,100
21,400
$58,700
$14,000
Adjustment
Dr. or (Cr.)
$(47,000)
$ 67,250
$
900
(5,000)
(2,350)
$ (6,450)
$(13,800)
Solutions Manual
11-87
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-7
(a)
To:
Linda Monkland, Shareholder of Monkland Ltd.
From:
Your name, Accountant
Date:
June 30, 2014
Subject:
Recommendation of accounting methods
This memo addresses the concerns and constraints you raised
and recommends depreciation methods for the building and
equipment. Detailed calculations have been provided.
Aside from the principle in the accounting standard that
underlies the accounting policy choice, the following
calculations need to be made so the consequences of the
methods may be assessed.
Depreciation charges for 2014 under alternative methods:
DoubleDeclining
Method
Building:
DDB: $90,000 X 2/25
SL: ($90,000 – $15,000)/25
Equipment:
DDB: $50,000 X 2/5
SL: ($50,000 – $5,000) / 5
UOP: ($50,000 – $5,000)
X 2,400/15,000
StraightLine
Method
Activity
Method
7,200(1)
3,000(2)
20,000(3)
9,000(4)
7,200(5)
Solutions Manual
11-88
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
7,200
20,000
7,200
3,000
3,000
3,000
1 and 5
2 and 3
2 and 4
2 and 5
10,200
269,800
268,000
257,000
265,600
263,800
$252,800
Total
Assets
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
44.5%
44.8%
46.7%
45.2%
45.5%
47.5%
Long-term debt to total assets = $120,000/ Total asset amount calculated
Income divided by total assets = rate of return on total assets
= Income calculated / Total assets calculated
Current ratio is not affected by the consequences of the depreciation method = 100,000 / 40,000 = 2.5:1
7.3%
6.7%
2.7%
5.9%
5.2%
1.1%
Current
Net
LTD/TA
Ratio
Inc./TA
Total assets = $280,000 – Accumulated Depreciation (the total expense for year ended 2014)
Net income = $30,000 – total depreciation expense
19,800
18,000
7,000
23,000
12,000
15,600
13,800
$2,800
Net
Income
14,400
16,200
$27,200
Total
Expense
Combinations reflect number code on previous page
7,200
9,000
9,000
7,200
1 and 4
$20,000
Depr.
Equipment
$ 7,200
Depr.
Buildings
1 and 3
Method
Combinations
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-7 (Continued)
Solutions Manual
11-89
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-7 (Continued)
The consequences of this analysis are that the following
combination of methods meets your concerns for 2014.
1.
Current ratio greater than 2. All methods satisfy this
concern as the depreciation method will affect neither
current assets nor current liabilities.
2.
Long-term debt to total asset ratio less than 46%. The
combinations of methods meeting this criterion (using code
numbers) are:
1 and 4
1 and 5
2 and 4
2 and 5
3.
Net income less than $14,000. The combinations of
methods meeting this criterion (using code numbers) are:
1 and 3
1 and 4
2 and 3
4.
Rate of return on total assets of at least 5% is achieved in
the following combinations:
1 and 4
1 and 5
2 and 4
2 and 5
Solutions Manual
11-90
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-7 (Continued)
Recommendation: Use the double-declining balance method for
the building (1) and the straight-line method for the equipment
(4). Only this combination satisfactorily meets all your concerns.
All methods examined are permitted under both ASPE and IFRS.
I hope that these explanations and recommendations help clarify
the concerns and issues you raised for Monkland Ltd.
(b) According to the GAAP accounting standards, the
depreciation method should reflect the pattern in which the
asset benefits are expected to be used up by the entity.
Because the building is likely to be useful to the company
on the basis of time (an equal charge each year), the
double-declining balance method that has higher charges in
the early years may not be appropriate. In addition, if the
equipment deteriorates with use, the straight-line method
may not be appropriate.
It is important to note that once a depreciation method is
selected, the comparability (consistency) principle and
ASPE/IFRS requirements for changes in accounting
policies, will allow you to voluntarily change methods only if
the new method results in reliable and more relevant
financial information. This means that you may have to keep
the depreciation method for several years, even after the
importance of meeting analytical constraints passes and
other reporting objectives take their place.
I would also like to point out that a longer-term analysis
should be performed. Over several years, the impact of a
double-declining method will change and may affect future
years’ constraints in a negative manner.
Solutions Manual
11-91
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-7 (Continued)
In conclusion, I would like to point out that even though the
constraints highlighted in the foregoing report are
important, the depreciation methods selected should reflect
the assets’ underlying economic performance and the
pattern in which the assets’ benefits are expected to be
used up by Monkland.
(d)
While all three depreciation methods are recognized by
both ASPE (and IFRS), the depreciation methods selected
should reflect the pattern in which the assets’ benefits are
expected to be used up by Monkland. By selecting the
depreciation methods that satisfy the constraints of certain
users, Monkland’s financial statements may not be
faithfully representative, neutral or free from bias.
Because Monkland is a private company, fewer users rely
on the company’s financial reports. The major users
identified and affected are the suppliers, the bank, the
company’s manager, and potential investors. These users
could suffer financial losses if the statements are based
only on shorter-term constraints, as Linda Monkland may
be sacrificing users’ needs and quality of earnings content
(as discussed in Chapter 4), in order to achieve shorterterm constraints.
Linda Monkland is in a position to explain variation from
the constraining ratios to each type of user, and may want
to think about renegotiating the constraints so they are
based on pre-depreciation numbers or results based on
agreed upon depreciation policies.
Solutions Manual
11-92
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-8
(a)
The ship consists of three major components, each with
cost representing a significant portion of the total asset,
and useful life, residual value, and pattern of providing
economic benefits differing from the other major
components.
Under IFRS, entities are required to recognize major
components separately for the purpose of depreciation.
For each component, the depreciation method should be
the method that best reflects the pattern of economic
benefits to be received from the component.
Because the pattern of benefits received from the engines
varies with activity, the units of production method would
be most appropriate for the engines. The double-declining
balance method would be most appropriate for the hull.
The straight-line method would be most appropriate for the
body of the ship, with benefits to be received evenly over
the life of the body.
(b)
June 30, 2014
Ship Engines
Ship Hull
Ship Body
Cash
*$975,000 X 6
5,850,000 *
3,350,000
87,800,000
97,000,000
Solutions Manual
11-93
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-8 (Continued)
(c)
December 31, 2014
Depreciation expense
240,377
Accumulated Depreciation –
Ship Engines
($975,000 - $120,000) X 6 X 328,000 / 7,000,000
Depreciation expense
Accumulated Depreciation –
Ship Hull
100%/10 = 10% X 2 = 20%
($3,350,000 X 20%) X 6/12
240,377
335,000
335,000
Depreciation expense
2,410,000
Accumulated Depreciation –
2,410,000
Ship Body
($87.8 million - $15.5 million) / 15 X 6/12
(e)
Under ASPE, entities are also required to recognize
separate components for the purpose of depreciation;
however the practice has been not to recognize asset
components to the same extent as under IFRS.
Solutions Manual
11-94
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-9
(a)
Estimated depletion:
Depletion
Base
$870,000*
Estimated
Yield
120,000
tonnes
Estimated Depletion
Per
1st & 11th
Each of Yrs.
Tonne
Yrs.
2-10 Incl.
$7.25
$43,500**
$87,000***
* ($720,000 + $126,400 + $53,600 – $30,000)
** ($7.25 X 6,000)
*** ($7.25 X 12,000)
Estimated depreciation:
Asset
tonnes mined
Building
Machinery (1/2)
Machinery (1/2)
* $36,000
** $30,000
*** $30,000
Cost
$36,000
30,000
30,000
Per
tonne
mined
$.30*
.25**
.50***
1st
Yr.
Yrs.
2-5
6th
Yr.
Yrs. 710
11th
Yr.
6,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 6,000
$1,800 $3,600 $3,600 $3,600 $1,800
1,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,500
3,000 6,000 3,000
0
0
120,000 = $.30
120,000 = $.25
(120,000 X 1/2) = $.50
Solutions Manual
11-95
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-9 (Continued)
(b) Mineral Resources
Building
Machinery
Exploration Expense
Cash
Asset Retirement Obligation
900,000*
36,000
60,000
83,000
1,025,400
53,600
* ($720,000 + $126,400 + $53,600)
Depletion: $7.25 X 5,000 tonnes = $36,250
Depreciation:
Building $.30 X 5,000 =
Machinery $.25 X 5,000 =
Machinery $.50 X 5,000 =
Total depreciation
Inventory
Inventory (re: Depreciation Expense,
Building)
Inventory (re: Depreciation Expense,
Machinery)
Accumulated Depletion
- Mineral Resources
Accumulated Depreciation–
Buildings
Accumulated Depreciation–
Machinery
$1,500
1,250
2,500
$5,250
36,250
1,500
3,750
36,250
1,500
3,750
Solutions Manual
11-96
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-9 (Continued)
(c) Depletion: $7.25 X 4,500 tonnes =
Depreciation: Building $.30 X 4,500 =
Machinery $.25 X 4,500 =
Machinery $.50 X 4,500 =
Total depreciation
Cost of goods sold
$32,625
$1,350
1,125
2,250
$4,725
$37,350
The depletion would be included as a product cost and
would be transferred to cost of goods sold as the minerals
are sold. The depreciation is included in cost of goods sold
as it forms part of the product cost under absorption
costing. For all the tonnes mined that were sold, all of the
above costs would be included on the income statement.
The first year income statement would also show the
exploration costs of $83,000.
Solutions Manual
11-97
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-10
(a)
Original cost
Deduct residual
value of land
$550 X 3,000 =
$1,650,000
$200 X 3,000 =
600,000
1,050,000
Cost of logging road
Depletion base
$1,200,000
500,000 m3
(b)
150,000
$1,200,000
= $2.40 depletion per m3
Inventory
240,000
Accumulated Depletion—Timber
Accumulated Depreciation—
Logging Roads
210,000
30,000
Depletion, 2014: 20% X 500,000 m3 = 100,000 m3;
Timber property: 100,000 m3 X ($1,050,000 / 500,000 m3) =
$210,000
Logging roads: 100,000 m3 X ($150,000 / 500,000 m3) =
$30,000
(c)
Loss of timber
($1,050,000 – $210,000)
Cost of salvaging timber
Less recovery ($3 X 400,000 m3)
Loss of land value ($200 x 3,000)
Loss of logging roads
[($150,000 – (20% X $150,000)]
Logging equipment
Loss due to eruption of Mt. Leno
$840,000
700,000
(1,200,000)
$ 340,000
600,000
120,000
300,000
$1,360,000
Note: Under both ASPE and IFRS, the loss might be
classified as unusual, and would be included in profit or
loss
for
the
period.
Solutions Manual
11-98
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-11
(a)
The amounts to be recorded on the books of Darby
Sporting Goods Inc. as of December 31, 2014, for each of
the assets acquired from Encino Athletic Equipment
Company are calculated as follows:
Cost Allocations to Acquired Properties
Remaining
Purchase
Appraisal
Value
(1) Land
(2) Factory
(3) Machinery
Totals
Price
Allocations
Renovations
Capitalized
Interest
$290,000
$290,000
1
$290,000
Total
$ 77,000
33,0001
$110,000
2
$100,000
$21,000
$100,000
$21,000
198,000
33,000
$521,000
Supporting Calculations
1
Balance of purchase price to be allocated.
Total purchase price ...........................................................
$400,000
Less: Land appraisal ..........................................................
290,000
Balance to be allocated..............................................
$110,000
Appraisal
Values
Factory
$105,000
Machinery
45,000
Totals
$150,000
2
Ratios
105/150 =
.70
45/150 =
.30
1.00
X $110,000
X $110,000
Allocated
Values
$77,000
33,000
$110,000
Capitalizable interest (amount given in problem).
Solutions Manual
11-99
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-11 (Continued)
Note to instructor: If the interest is allocated between the
building and the machinery, $14,700 ($21,000 X 105/150)
would be allocated to the building and $6,300 ($21,000 X
45/150) would be allocated to the machinery.
(b)
Darby Sporting Goods Inc.’s 2015 depreciation expense,
for book purposes, for each of the assets acquired from
Encino Athletic Equipment Company is as follows:
1.
Land: No depreciation.
2.
Factory: Depreciation rate
2015 depreciation
expense
= 150% X 1/15 = .10
= Cost X Rate X 1/2 year
= $198,000 X .10 X 1/2
= $9,900
3.
Machinery: Depreciation rate
2015 depreciation
expense
= 200% X 1/5 = .40
= Cost X Rate X 1/2 year
= $33,000 X .40 X 1/2
= $6,600
Solutions Manual
11-100
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-11 (Continued)
(c)
Arguments for the capitalization of interest costs include
the following.
1. Interest costs incurred during construction of capital
assets that take substantial time to get ready for use
meet the definition of an asset if they are directly
attributable to bringing the asset to the required
location and condition to operate as intended by
management.
2. Total interest costs should be allocated to enterprise
assets and operations, just as material, labour, and
overhead costs are allocated.
Arguments against the capitalization of interest include the
following:
1. Interest capitalized in a period would tend to be offset
by depreciation of interest capitalized in prior periods.
2. Interest cost is a cost of financing, not of construction.
Solutions Manual
11-101
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-12
(a)
Depreciation (2013) = $10,000,000 / 8 years = $1,250,000
Depreciation (Jan. – Mar. 2014)
= $1,250,000 X 3/12 = $312,500
Depreciation (Apr. – Dec. 2014)
= ($10,000,000 + $875,000 – $1,562,500) / (96 – 15) =
$114,969 per month
= $114,969 per month X 9 months = $1,034,721
Total depreciation (2014) = $312,500 + $1,034,721
= $1,347,221
Accumulated Depreciation at Dec. 31, 2014 = $1,250,000 +
$1,347,221 = $2,597,221
Carrying amount of equipment at Dec. 31, 2014
= $10,875,000 – $2,597,221 = $8,277,779.
Using the Cost Recovery Impairment Model under ASPE,
undiscounted future net cash flows ($6,300,000) < carrying
amount ($8,277,779), therefore the equipment is impaired.
Impairment entry:
Loss on Impairment
2,677,779*
Accumulated Impairment Losses
- Equipment
2,677,779
*$8,277,779 – $5,600,000
(b)
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation
- Equipment
**($5,600,000 4)
1,400,000**
1,400,000
No recovery of impairment loss would be recorded since
recovery of impairment losses is not permitted under
ASPE.
Solutions Manual
11-102
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-12 (Continued)
(c)
The answer to part (b) would remain the same. As of
December 31, 2015, the asset is still in use and not ready
for sale in its current state, and there is no active program
to find a buyer, therefore the held for sale criteria are not
met. The equipment would continue to be classified as
property, plant, and equipment and depreciated in 2015 and
into 2016 until the held for sale criteria are met.
(d)
Assuming that the asset meets all criteria classification as
held for sale as of January 1, 2015, the equipment would
not be depreciated in 2015. It would be classified as “held
for sale” in a separate section of the balance sheet. The
increase in fair value during 2015 would be recorded as
follows:
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Equipment
Recovery of Loss from
Impairment
Fair value
Carrying amount
Recovery of Loss from Impairment
(e)
300,000
300,000
$5,900,000
5,600,000
$ 300,000
For parts (b) and (c) the equipment would be shown as part
of property, plant and equipment. For part (d), the
equipment would be shown as a non-current “Asset held
for sale” in a separate section of the balance sheet.
Solutions Manual
11-103
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-12 (Continued)
(f)
Under IFRS, IAS 36 uses the Rational Entity Impairment
Model and compares the asset’s recoverable amount of
$5,800,000 (the higher of its value in use or discounted
future net cash flows of $5,800,000, and its fair value less
costs to sell of $5,600,000), with the asset’s carrying
amount of $8,277,779 (as calculated in part a).
The impairment test indicates that impairment has
occurred since the carrying amount exceeds the
recoverable amount. The impairment loss is then
calculated as follows:
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Carrying amount
Recoverable amount
Impairment loss
$10,875,000
2,597,221
8,277,779
5,800,000
$2,477,779
December 31, 2014
Loss on Impairment ........................................................
2,477,779
Accumulated Impairment
Losses—Equipment ........................ Equipment
2,477,779
December 31, 2015
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
1,450,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Equipment ..........................................................
1,450,000
New carrying amount
Useful life
Depreciation per year
$5,800,000
4 years
$1,450,000
Solutions Manual
11-104
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-12 (Continued)
(f) (Continued)
Under IAS 36, the reversal of a previous impairment loss
amount is limited. The specific asset cannot be increased
in value to more than what its carrying amount would have
been, net of depreciation, if the original impairment loss
had never been recognized.
December 31, 2014 pre-impairment loss carrying
amount ...............................................................................
$8,277,779
2015 depreciation based on pre-impairment carrying
amount ($8,277,779 ÷ 4 years) ..............................................
2,069,445
December 31, 2015 pre-impairment carrying amount .........
$6,208,334
The December 31, 2015 carrying amount would have been
$6,208,334 if the impairment had not occurred; this is the
maximum carrying amount that can be reflected for the
equipment in the December 31, 2015 balance sheet.
Actual December 31, 2014 carrying amount................
Actual 2015 depreciation (based on impairment) ...(a)
Indicated December 31, 2015 carrying amount ...........
December 31, 2015 fair value …………………………..
Recovery of previously recognized impairment .... (b)
$5,800,000
1,450,000
4,350,000
5,900,000
$1,550,000
Thus, the net effect on the 2015 net income (loss) is a net
increase of $100,000 [= (a) – (b)]. The asset can be restored
to its indicated December 31, 2015 fair value of $5,900,000
as this does not exceed the carrying amount that would
have existed at this date had the impairment in 2014 never
been recognized.
December 31, 2015
Accumulated Impairment Losses—
Equipment ...................................................................
1,550,000
Recovery of Loss from
Impairment .........................................................
1,550,000
Solutions Manual
11-105
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-12 (Continued)
(g)
For the information presented in financial statements to be
relevant, faithfully represented, and useful to decision
makers, each asset on the balance sheet must not be
reported (valued) at an amount greater than its recoverable
amount.
Under IFRS, at the end of each reporting period, assets
must be assessed for internal or external indicators of
impairment. Under ASPE, assets must be assessed for
indicators of impairment only when events and changes in
circumstances indicate that an asset’s carrying amount
may not be recoverable. If one or more indicators of
impairment exist, the entity should conduct an objective
impairment or recoverability test. Frequent assessment for
indicators of impairment helps to ensure that impairment
or recoverability tests are conducted in a timely manner,
and that asset values on the balance sheet are not
overstated.
Solutions Manual
11-106
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-13
The following accounting treatment appears appropriate for
these items:
Land
Cash
Loss on Expropriation
Investment Property
February 15
31,000
9,000
40,000
March 31 (entry not requested)
Investment Property
35,000
Cash
35,000
The loss on the expropriation of the land of $9,000 ($40,000 –
$31,000) should be reported as an unusual item on the income
statement. The $35,000 land purchase has no income statement
effect. The treatment of the loss on disposal under IFRS and
ASPE is the same.
Building
To correct April 2 entry
15,000
Land
Buildings
15,000
November entry
3,600
Cash
Land
3,600
There is no recognized gain or loss on the demolition of the
building. The entire purchase cost ($15,000), decreased by the
demolition proceeds ($3,600), is allocated to land.
Solutions Manual
11-107
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-13 (Continued)
Warehouse
June 30
Cash
Accumulated Depreciation – Buildings
Gain on Disposal of Buildings
Buildings (Warehouse)
74,000
16,000
20,000
70,000
The gain on the destruction of the warehouse should be
reported as an unusual item, assuming that it is a significant
amount and infrequent. The gain is calculated as follows:
Insurance proceeds
Deduct: Cost
Less accumulated depreciation
Realized gain
$74,000
$70,000
16,000
54,000
$20,000
Some contend that a portion of this gain should be deferred
because the proceeds are reinvested in similar assets. Deferral
of the gain in this situation is not permitted under IFRS or ASPE.
Machine
December 26
Machinery (new)
Cash
Accumulated Depreciation – Machinery
Machinery (old)
Gain on Disposal of Machinery
6,300
900
2,800
8,000
2,000
The recognized gain on the transaction is calculated as follows,
assuming the trade-in transaction had economic substance:
Fair market value of old machine
Deduct: Cost
$ 8,000
Less accumulated depreciation
(2,800)
Total gain
$ 7,200
5,200
$ 2,000
Solutions Manual
11-108
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-13 (Continued)
This gain would likely be reported in other revenues and gains. It
is not likely to be reported as an unusual item because the
company appears to acquire and dispose of capital assets on a
regular basis. The cost of the new machine would be capitalized
at $6,300.
If there is no economic difference in the company after this trade
than before (i.e., the transaction did not have economic
substance), the new machine would be recognized at the book
value of the assets given up: ($8,000 - $2,800) - $900 received =
$4,300, and no gain would be recognized on the income
statement. ASPE and IFRS require the same treatment.
Furniture
August 15
Accum’d Depreciation – Furniture and
Fixtures
7,850
Contribution Expense
3,100
Furniture and Fixtures
10,000
Gain on Disposal of Furniture and Fixtures
950
The contribution of the furniture would be reported as a
contribution expense of $3,100 with a related gain on disposal of
assets of $950: $3,100 – ($10,000 – $7,850). The contribution
expense and the related gain may be netted, if desired.
Automobile
November 3
Cash
Accumulated Depreciation—Automobiles
Loss on Disposal of Automobiles
Automobiles
2,960
3,460
2,580
9,000
The loss on sale of the automobile of $2,580: [$2,960 – ($9,000 –
$3,460)] would be reported in the other expenses or losses
section. It is not likely to be reported as an unusual item
because the company appears to acquire and dispose of capital
assets on a regular basis.
Solutions Manual
11-109
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-14
1.
$82,000
Allocated in proportion to appraised values
(1/10 X $820,000).
2.
$738,000 Allocated in proportion to appraised values
(9/10 X $820,000).
3.
Forty
years
Cost less residual ($738,000 – $40,000) divided
by annual depreciation ($17,450).
4.
$17,450
Same as prior year since it is straight-line
depreciation.
5.
$91,000
[Number of shares (2,500) times fair value ($30)]
plus demolition cost of existing building
($16,000).
6.
None
No depreciation before use.
7.
$30,000
Fair value.
8.
$4,500
Cost ($30,000) times percentage (1/10 X 150%).
9.
$3,825
Cost ($30,000) less prior year’s depreciation
($4,500) equals $25,500. Multiply $25,500
times 1/10 x 150% or 15%.
10.
$150,000 Total cost ($164,900) less repairs and
maintenance ($14,900).
11.
$37,500
Cost times 1/8 x 200% ($150,000 X 1/8 x 200%).
Rate is 25%.
12.
$9,375
Cost less prior year’s depreciation ($150,000 $37,500)
multiplied by 25% = $28,125 for the year.
Multiply by 4/12 to get expense since was
sold Feb. 1.
Solutions Manual
11-110
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-14 (Continued)
13.
14.
$52,000
$2,600
Cash paid at acquisition:
Down payment
First annual payment, Oct 1/14
$5,740
6,000
11,740
Annual payments:
10 years, $6,000, 8%, PV 6.710
40,260
Total cost:
52,000
Cost ($52,000) divided by estimated life (20
years).
Solutions Manual
11-111
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-15
Situation 1:
Year
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
$1,000/year* X 7/12 =
Depreciation
Expense
$583
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,548
1,735
*
**
***
*2011 to 2014:
Straight-line Method:
$12,400 – $2,400
= $1,000/year
10 years
**2015:
Revised estimate of useful life and residual value:
Carrying amount of
equipment:
$12,400 – ($583 + [$1,000 X 3])
= $8,817
Depreciation
expense:
$8,817 – $2,000
96 months – 43 months
= $129/month
= $129/month X 12 months = $1,548
***2016:
Depreciation expense = $129/month X 4 months
of old equipment
+
Depreciation expense $14,100 – $1,300 X 8/12
of new equipment
7
= $516
= 1,219
$1,735
Cost of new equipment = Cash paid of $11,300 plus fair value of
old equipment of $2,800 = $14,100.
Solutions Manual
11-112
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-15 (Continued)
Situation 2:
Cost of Truck
= $5,000 down payment + $48,013 (present
value of note)
= $53,013
Present value
of note
= Annuity amount X Present value factor of $1
for 4 years at 8%
= $14,496 X 3.31213
= $48,013
Calculation of interest expense is shown at end of problem.
2014:
September 30, 2014
Trucks
Cash
Notes Payable
53,013
5,000
48,013
December 31, 2014
Interest Expense
Interest Payable
($48,013 X 8% X 3/12)
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation—Trucks
($106/delivery* X 45 deliveries)
960
960
4,770
4,770
*Depreciation rate = $53,013/ 500 deliveries = $106 / delivery
2015:
September 30, 2015
Interest Expense ($48,013 x 8% x 9/12)
Interest Payable
Notes Payable
Cash
2,881
960
10,655
14,496
Solutions Manual
11-113
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-15 (Continued)
December 31, 2015
Interest Expense
Interest Payable
($37,358 X 8% X 3/12)
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation—Trucks
($106/delivery X 125 deliveries)
747
747
13,250
13,250
2016:
September 30, 2016
Interest Expense ($37,358 x 8% x 9/12)
Interest Payable
Notes Payable
Cash
2,242
747
11,507
14,496
December 31, 2016
Interest Expense
Interest Payable
($25,851 X 8% X 3/12)
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation—Trucks
($106/delivery X 134 deliveries)
517
517
14,204
14,204
2017:
July 31, 2017
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation—Trucks
($106/delivery X 79 deliveries)
Cash
Accumulated Depreciation—Trucks
($4,770 + $13,250 + $14,204 + $8,374)
Loss on Disposal of Trucks
Trucks
8,374
8,374
12,000
40,598
415
53,013
Solutions Manual
11-114
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-15 (Continued)
Interest Expense ($1,723 – $517)
Interest Payable
Notes Payable
Cash
1,206
517
25,851
27,574
Calculation of interest expense on the note payable:
Carrying
Amount of
Fiscal
Note at
Year beginning
2014
2015
$48,013
2016
37,358
2017
25,851
Interest
Expense
(8%)
$3,841
2,989
1,723*
ReducCarrying
tion of
Amount of
Payment principal Note at end
$48,013
$14,496
$10,655
37,358
14,496
11,507
25,851
* Interest expense in 2017: $25,851 X 8% X 10/12
Situation 3:
Cost of Machines = $75,000 + $2,000 freight + $1,500 unloading
charges = $78,500
February 17, 2015
Machinery
Cash
78,500
78,500
December 31, 2015
Royalty Expense
Cash
Depreciation Expense
Accumulated Depreciation—
Machinery($0.39/unit* X 13,000 units)
13,000
13,000
5,070
5,070
* $78,500 / 200,000 = $0.39 per unit
Solutions Manual
11-115
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-15 (Continued)
Situation 4:
December 31, 2014
Depreciation expense
Accumulated Depreciation Equipment
($323,000 - $65,000) / 5
51,600
51,600
Depreciation expense is recorded until the equipment
qualifies as held for sale.
Loss on Impairment
77,500
Accumulated Impairment Losses
– Equipment
($323,000 - $51,600 X 9/12 - $51,600 X 3) - $52,000
77,500
December 31, 2015
Accumulated Impairment Losses Equipment
Recovery of Loss from Impairment
77,500
77,500
For assets held for sale, loss recoveries are limited to the
amount of the cumulative losses previously recognized. In
this example, fair value less costs to sell increased by
$93,000 ($145,000 - $52,000) since the write-down on
December 31, 2014. Therefore the full amount of the loss
previously recognized may be recovered.
Solutions Manual
11-116
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
*PROBLEM 11-16
(a)
Capital Cost Allowance Schedule for Class 10, 30%.
CCA
UCC, 01/01/2012
Additions during 2012:
Disposals during 2012:
CCA, 2012: $29,200 X 30% X 1/2
UCC, 12/31/2012
UCC, 01/01/2013
Additions during 2013:
Disposals during 2013
(lesser of cost of $8,000 and
proceeds of $7,000):
UCC, before CCA
CCA, 2013: $22,620 X 30%
(net additions must be greater
than zero for ½-year rule)
UCC, 12/31/2013
UCC, 01/01/2014
Additions during 2014:
Disposals during 2014:
CCA, 2014: $5,000 X 30% X 1/2
$15,834 X 30%
UCC, 12/31/2014
$4,380
UCC
$ 0
29,200
0
(4,380)
$24,820
$24,820
4,800
(7,000)
22,620
$6,786
(6,786)
$15,834
$15,834
5,000*
0
$ 750
4,750
(5,500)
$15,334
*The investment tax credit of $1,000 is included in the year
following acquisition
Solutions Manual
11-117
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
*PROBLEM 11-16 (Continued)
CCA
UCC, 01/01/2015
Additions during 2015:
Adjustment:
investment tax credit on Asset E
Disposals during 2015:
Asset A: (lesser of cost of
$20,000 and proceeds of $9,900)
Asset C: (lesser of cost of
$1,200 and proceeds of $1,800)
UCC, before CCA
CCA, 2015: $3,234 X 30%
UCC, 12/31/2015
UCC, 01/01/2016
Additions during 2016:
Disposals during 2016:
Asset D: (lesser of cost of
$4,800 and proceeds of $0)
Asset E: (lesser of cost of
$4,000 and proceeds of $500)
UCC, before CCA
CCA, none is taken since there
are no assets left in the
class.
Terminal loss
UCC, 12/31/2016
UCC
$15,334
0
(1,000)
(9,900)
$970
(1,200)
3,234
(970)
$2,264
$2,264
0
0
(500)
1,764
(1,764)
$0
Solutions Manual
11-118
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
*PROBLEM 11-16 (Continued)
(b)
Capital gains occur where proceeds of disposal exceed the
original cost of the asset. This is the case only for Asset C:
Proceeds of disposal of $1,800 less cost of $1,200 = $600
capital gain. Capital gains are taxed at a reduced rate; the
taxable capital gain (50% X $600) is included with other
taxable income.
A terminal loss of $1,764 occurs in 2016 since there is still
a positive UCC balance even though all assets have been
disposed of. This balance is deductible in full when
calculating taxable income for the period.
There is no recapture for any of the years. Recapture
occurs when, after deducting the disposals from the class,
a negative amount is left as the UCC balance. Recapture,
when it occurs, is included in the calculation of taxable
income in the year.
Solutions Manual
11-119
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
*PROBLEM 11-17
(a)
Cost reduction method:
1.
Buildings .........................................................................
380,000
Cash ........................................................................
380,000
2.
Cash ................................................................................
180,000
Buildings ................................................................
180,000
3.
December 31, 2014:
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
3,333
Accumulated Depreciation –
Buildings ............................................................3,333
($380,000 – $180,000) ÷ 15 X 3/12 = $3,333
4.
December 31, 2015:
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
13,333
Accumulated Depreciation –
Buildings ............................................................
13,333
($380,000 – $180,000) ÷ 15 = $13,333
Solutions Manual
11-120
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
PROBLEM 11-17 (Continued)
(b)
Deferral method:
1.
Buildings .........................................................................
380,000
Cash ........................................................................
380,000
2.
Cash ..............................................................
180,000
ssistance)
Deferred Revenue - Government
180,000
Grants .............................................................................
3.
December 31, 2014:
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
6,333
Accumulated Depreciation –
Buildings ($380,000 ÷ 15 X 3/12) ........................6,333
Deferred Revenue - Government
3,000
Grants ..............................................................................
Revenue from Government Grant.........................3,000
$180,000 ÷ 15 X 3/12 = $3,000
4.
December 31, 2015:
Depreciation Expense.....................................................
25,333
Accumulated Depreciation –
Buildings .............................................................
25,333
$380,000 ÷ 15 = $25,333
Deferred Revenue - Government
12,000
Grants ..............................................................................
Revenue --Government Grants .............................
12,000
$180,000 ÷ 15 = $12,000
(c)
Kitchigami will report the same amount of income before
tax whether the cost reduction method, used in (a) or the
deferral method, used in (b) is used.
Solutions Manual
11-121
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Young, Wiecek, McConomy
Intermediate Accounting, Tenth Canadian Edition
*PROBLEM 11-17 (Continued)
Income before depreciation and
income tax
Other revenues: Government grant
Depreciation expense
Income before income tax
(d)
Class 6, 10%:
Beginning UCC, Jan. 1, 2014
Addition ($380,000 – $180,000)
UCC, before CCA
Less ½ net addition
UCC, for CCA purposes
CCA, 10%
Method
(a)
$79,000
Method
(b)
$79,000
13,333
$65,667
12,000
25,333
$65,667
CCA
UCC
Add back ½ net additions
UCC, Dec. 31, 2014
$0
$200,000
200,000
(100,000)
100,000
(10,000)
90,000
100,000
$190,000
UCC, Jan. 1, 2015
CCA, 10%
UCC, Dec. 31, 2015 (tax value)
$190,000
(19,000)
$171,000
$10,000
$19,000
Solutions Manual
11-122
Chapter 11
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.