Appendix 22 (faq_aceinhibitors)

advertisement
Reducing risk in type 2 diabetes
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT USE OF ACE INHIBITORS IN
PATIENTS WITH DIABETES
These responses are based on a brief review of the literature and the document has NOT been subject to expert
review. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review on the topic. Feel free to contact Nighat Faruqi
(nfaruqi@nps.org.au) with any additional information on the questions raised, if you disagree with the answers given
or if you would like an issue expert reviewed so that it can be distributed.
Please do not distribute this document to doctors.
1. ACE inhibitors for all patients with diabetes?
a. “I am just trying to treat hypertension”
If the patient has diabetes and hypertension and no other problems, ACE inhibitors
are as good as other commonly used antihypertensive classes at (i) lowering blood
pressure and (ii) improving cardiovascular outcomes.1
The most important thing is to lower the BP.
b. “My patient has microalbuminuria as well as hypertension”
ACE inhibitors slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy.2
This renoprotective effect is thought to be independent of their bloodpressure lowering effect.
An ACE inhibitor is therefore recommended first-line in this group of patients.3
c. “My patient has microalbuminuria but normal blood pressure”
The HOPE study micro-HOPE substudy demonstrated that ACE inhibitors
can improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and
microalbuminuria, even in the absence of hypertension.4, 5
For this reason, the guidelines state that on encountering this scenario, clinicians
should consider prescribing an ACE inhibitor.6, 7
d. “My patient has a normal blood pressure and no microalbuminuria, but
has a high cholesterol level”
The inclusion criteria for the HOPE study tried to capture those at highest
cardiovascular risk. Patients over the age of 55 were recruited if they had either a
past history of cardiovascular disease and/or diabetes, plus one other risk factor,
Reducing risk in type 2 diabetes
FAQs about ACE inhibitors
22/02/2006
Page 1 of 3
which included dyslipidaemia, smoking as well as microalbuminuria. The study went
on to show a benefit with the use of ramipril for these groups of people.4, 5 It may be
argued from this study that patients may benefit from being prescribed an ACE
inhibitor even in the absence of both hypertension or albuminuria, if they are over the
age of 55 and have one or more other cardiovascular risk factors.
Until further multicentre studies that confirm these findings are carried
out, however, it cannot become a firm recommendation.6
e. “I wish to prevent the onset of microalbuminuria in my patient with
diabetes”
ACE inhibition may prevent early onset of microalbuminuria but further
studies incorporating long-term renal function data are required.
There have been a handful of studies that have looked at delay of progression to
albuminuria in patients with diabetes. For instance, a study by Ravi et al (1998) found
a modest but statistically significant renal protective effect of ACE inhibition in a lowrisk group of normotensive, normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes. The
authors state, however, that these results should not be interpreted as advocating the
introduction of ACE inhibition for the prophylaxis of nephropathy upon diagnosis of
diabetes, and that long-term studies are needed to find out whether the observed
effect would persist and retard the development of overt diabetic nephropathy.8 A
more recent study by Ruggenenti et al (2004) demonstrated that in subjects with type
2 diabetes and hypertension but with normoalbuminuria, the use of an ACE inhibitor
plus a non dihydropyridine CCB and an ACE inhibitor alone decreased the incidence of
microalbuminuria to a similar extent over a follow-up period of a median of 3.6 years.9
A post hoc analysis of the HOPE study found a lower incidence of overt nephropathy in
subjects with type 2 diabetes who received ACE inhibitor therapy than in controls.5
This study was not designed to assess the incidence of microalbuminuria, however,
because patients with microalbuminuria were included in the study itself.
2. A class effect or a drug effect?
There is no evidence that any specific ACE inhibitor offers any advantage over the
class effect.
It is not clear whether the effects noted in studies that used a particular drug can be
attributed to specific effects of the drug itself or to the general properties of the drug class
(so that any drugs in that class may be used for the same purpose). Individual drug
indications listed in AMH merely reflect particular study results10.
Reducing risk in type 2 diabetes
FAQs about ACE inhibitors
22/02/2006
Page 2 of 3
References
1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of
macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK
Prospective Diabetes Study Group.[see comment][erratum appears in BMJ 1999 Jan
2;318(7175):29]. BMJ 317(7160):703-13, 1998 Sep 12 1998.
2. Hamilton RA, Kane MP, Demers J. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and
type 2 diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy 2003;23:909-15.
3. National Heart Foundation of Australia. Hypertension management guide for doctors
2004. www.heartfoundation.com.au 2004; 1-24 2004).
4. HOPE Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor,
ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2000;342:145-53.
5. HOPE Study Investigators. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular
outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE
substudy. Lancet 2000;355:253-9.
6. Writing Group for Therapeutic Guidelines. Therapeutic Guidelines: Endocrinology. 3
ed. North Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited, 2004.
7. Harris P, Joyner B, Phillips P, et al. Diabetes management in general practice. 10th ed:
Diabetes Australia, 2004/5.
8. Ravid M, Brosh D, Levi Z, et al. Use of enalapril to attenuate decline in renal function
in normotensive, normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomized,
controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:982-8.
9. Ruggenenti P, Fassi A, Ilieva AP, et al. Preventing microalbuminuria in type 2
diabetes. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1941-51.
10. Rossi S HS, Vitry A. Australian Medicines Handbook. Adelaide: Australian
Medicines Handbook, 2005.
Reducing risk in type 2 diabetes
FAQs about ACE inhibitors
22/02/2006
Page 3 of 3
Download