IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
IEEE NEURAL NETWORKS SOCIETY
REVIEW FORM
Reviewer: Please review this paper within the week so we can get a timely review back to the authors. Please write comments to
author on the other side or a separate sheet of paper. Evaluate technical quality, content and, in addition, adequacy of abstract,
introduction, organization, figures, and references.
PAPER TEC#
PAPER TITLE:
000
Title Here
REVIEWER #
(Please Print Clearly)
REVIEWER’S NAME
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
EMAIL :
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO:
SHOULD THIS BE CONSIDERED FOR A “BEST PAPER” AWARD?
Associate Editor
Address 1
Address 2
Address 3
Address 4
I. OVERALL EVALUATION (COMMENTS TO AUTHOR ON BACK OF THIS SHEET OR ON SEPARATE PAGE)
Contribution
Exceptional
Significant
Minor
Questionable
None
New
Results
Significant
Applications
Survey or
Tutorial
II. OVERALL RECOMMENDATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
ACCEPT: Article is acceptable for publication in its present form.
REVISE AND ACCEPT: Required changes are minor and may be made by author without
further review.
REVISE AND RESUBMIT: Article is acceptable for publication provided that significant changes
are made as indicated in the reviewer’s comments. Revision will be carefully checked by the editor or
associate editor to ascertain whether the changes are acceptable.
REJECT:
Article is so poorly written that contributions, if any, are obscure.
Article is not appropriate for the IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.
The results are not correct.
Article is not suitable as a tutorial for reasons given below.
Other
III. CONFIDENTIAL COMMENTS TO EDITORS
IEEE policy regarding reviewing submitted papers: (1) IEEE policy requires that referees treat the contents of papers under review as privileged
information not to be disclosed to others before publication, and (2) it is expected that no one with access to a paper under review will make any
inappropriate use of the special knowledge that access provides.