INVESTMENT PLAN (OPEN AND MULTI-STAGE TENDERS) 2012-13 GRDC The GRDC is a statutory authority established to plan and invest in R&D for the Australian grains industry. Its primary objective is to support effective competition by Australian grain growers in global grain markets, through enhanced profitability and sustainability. Its primary business activity is the allocation and management of investment in grains R&D. © Grains Research and Development Corporation 2011 FOREWORD The GRDC is pleased to release the Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders). This document includes only those priorities subject to open tender and multistaged tender procurement methods and does not include direct negotiations, limited tenders and continuing investments. Other open tenders and multi-stage tenders may be advertised throughout the year. It is advised that potential partners and contractors regularly visit the GRDC web site for information. The overall 2012-13 Investment Plan builds on the GRDC Strategic R&D Plan 2007-121, the direction of the next strategic plan being developed for 2012-17, situational analysis of the Corporation’s immediate and broader business environment, rigorous review of existing investments, Australian Government and grower priorities, and a consultative process with grain growers, research partners and other key stakeholders. This 2012-13 Investment Plan provides an opportunity for prospective research partners to work with the GRDC to ensure that Australian grain growers have knowledge of, and access to, technologies and practices to enable them to effectively compete in global grain markets. The four strategies implemented during 2007-12 that supported this corporate objective were: Coordinate a national grains R&D agenda and portfolio Deliver against Australian Government priorities Grow and leverage total grains R&D investment, and Ensure R&D is market driven. Ahead in 2012-17, GRDC will build on these strategies by placing emphasis on: National coordination Focussing on delivering value Regional delivery Global reach ‘Your GRDC working with you’ – actively listening and engaging with growers and the broader grains industry. The Australian Government priorities and grain grower’s priorities will be reinforced in 2012-13 investments including those detailed in this document. The overall Investment Plan addresses climate change, productivity growth, supply chain and markets, natural resource management, biosecurity, innovative skills and technology development and adoption so as to increase farm profitability and sustainability. The GRDC will collaborate with its research partners with clearly defined performance measures and outcomes that will provide growers with the technologies and practices they require to remain competitive in global grain markets. We look forward to working with our research, development and extension partners over the coming years. John Harvey Managing Director 1 GRDC Strategic R&D Plan 2007-12 can be downloaded from the GRDC website www.grdc.com.au 3 4 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................... 7 Contact Information ............................................................................ 10 Key Dates ......................................................................................... 10 Guidelines for Applicants ..................................................................... 11 Questions and Answers ....................................................................... 15 A Quick Checklist ................................................................................. 15 Improving Crop Yield ........................................................................... 16 2.1.4.01C Australian Soybean Breeding Program ........................................ 16 Protecting Your Crop ........................................................................... 18 3.2.2.01C Fungicide Evaluation Of New Generation Actives In Cereals And Pulse Crops .................................................................................... 18 Profitable Farming Systems ................................................................. 20 4.2.1.01C More profit from crop nutrition .................................................. 20 4.3.1.01C Nitrogen Fixation in Farming Systems ........................................ 24 Maintaining the Farm Resource Base ................................................... 27 5.2.1.01C Improved Management of Soil Organic Matter for Profitable and Sustainable Cropping ............................................................... 27 Building Skills and Capacity ................................................................. 31 6.2.4.01C Graduate Certificate And Diploma In Sustainable Grains Production For Industry Advisers And Growers. ........................................... 31 Grower Services .................................................................................. 33 7.2.3.01C Northern Agribusiness Trial Extension Network ............................ 33 7.2.3.02C Western Agribusiness Trial Extension Network ............................. 35 7.2.4.01C Technical Workshops – Northern Region ..................................... 37 7.2.4.02C Technical Workshops – Southern Region..................................... 39 7.2.4.03C Grains Research Updates – Northern and Southern ...................... 41 7.2.4.04C Improving Practice Of Spray Drift Management Techniques ........... 44 7.2.4.05B Improving Grain Storage Extension ........................................... 46 7.2.4.06C National And Regional Agribusiness Reference Groups .................. 48 7.4.3.01C Converting information from research reports for a grower audience .. ............................................................................................ 51 5 6 Introduction The purpose of the GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders) is to inform our potential research partners about some of the Corporation’s new investment priorities for 2012-13. This document includes only those priorities with open tender and multi-stage tendering procurement methods. Other open tenders and multi-stage tenders may be advertised throughout the year. It is advised that potential partners and contractors regularly visit the GRDC web site for tender information. In preparing the GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open Tenders and Multi-stage Tenders), significant thought and energy has gone into developing a strong and coherent statement of the GRDC’s investment intentions. By clearly expressing our investment priorities, potential applicants are guided in preparing their tender applications so as to meet the Corporation’s requirements for 2012-13 investments. Responses that do not address the research priorities and all selection criteria identified in the GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders) will not be considered by the GRDC. How are GRDC investment priorities determined? The GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders) is the result of a rigorous consultative process, incorporating the following considerations: Building on the Strategies in the GRDC’s Strategic R&D Plan 2007-12– Prosperity through Innovation to achieve the following: Better farming practices and having them adopted faster Growers having access to superior varieties that enable them to effectively compete in global grain markets Delivery of new products and services to assist growers to effectively compete in global grain markets. Initiating strategies to achieve new strategic intentions of the upcoming Strategic Plan 2012-17 National coordination – ensuring that programs are nationally coordinated and the Australian grains industry has access to the infrastructure and capability it needs for the future Focussing on delivering value – investing in programs that address the key industry priorities with the greatest potential returns. The focus will be created through investment strategies under the following themes: o Growers Meeting Market Requirements o Improving Crop Yield o Protecting Your Crop o Profitable Farming Systems o Maintaining the Farm Resource Base o Building Skills and Capacity o Grower Services Regional delivery – delivering the outputs of research in innovative products and services relevant to growers and their advisers in each region Global reach – proactively sourcing new technologies and innovation from around the world for the Australian grains industry ‘Your GRDC working with you’ – actively listening and engaging with growers and the broader grains industry. 7 Consultation with stakeholders through GRDC Regional Panels The GRDC Panels play an important role in determining the Corporation’s investment priorities. The Panels consult extensively with growers and researchers through regional advisory committees, linkage groups, tours, site visits and project reviews. Identification of research, development and extension (RD&E) requirements for the 2012-13 investment cycle began in 2010. Prioritisation of the research issues took place during the early part of 2011 and took into account an evaluation of the progress of existing investments, regional issues, outcomes of project reviews and the current portfolio balance. The new priorities and outcomes were discussed and refined by Panels and GRDC staff during the Investment Planning Week in August 2011. Delivering on National Research and Rural R&D Priorities The Australian Government’s National Research Priorities are; an environmentally sustainable Australia, promoting and maintaining good health, frontier technologies for building and transforming Australian industries, and safeguarding Australia. The Australian Government’s Rural R&D Priorities, revised in May 2007 are: productivity and adding value, supply chain and markets, natural resource management, climate variability and climate change, and biosecurity. Innovation skills and technology are included as two additional areas which provide critical support for the Rural R&D Priorities. They reflect that fostering skills and technological development is essential to underpin the achievement of the research and development priorities. Further details on the Rural R&D Priorities (May 2007)2 and their objectives are as follows: o Productivity and Adding Value Improve the productivity and profitability of existing industries and support the development of viable new industries. o Supply Chain and Markets Better understand and respond to domestic and international market and consumer requirements and improve the flow of information through the whole supply chain, including to consumers. o Natural Resource Management Support effective management of Australia’s natural resources to ensure primary industries are both economically and environmentally sustainable. o Climate Variability and Climate Change Build resilience to climate variability and adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change. o Biosecurity Protect Australia’s community, primary industries and environment from biosecurity threats. Supporting the Rural R&D Priorities o Innovation Skills Improve the skills to undertake research and apply its findings. o Technology Promote the development of new and existing technologies. Continuing investments in 2012-13 The GRDC already has over $100 million in continuing investments for 2012-13. There are some important RD&E issues that are of high priority to the industry where the GRDC is NOT seeking new investments in 2012-13 because the Corporation believes that these are being adequately addressed within the current portfolio. 2 A copy of the National Research & Rural Priorities Booklet can be downloaded via a direct link from the GRDC Investment Plan page 8 How do we intend to pursue new investment priorities? Multi-stage tender - where GRDC is looking for innovative options or the entire specifications require input from potential providers. The first round will be Expression of Interest and the second round will be Direct Negotiation. These priorities are published in the GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders). All priorities in this Investment Plan are being addressed through the open tender process or multi-stage tendering process. Other Multi-stage tenders may be advertised throughout the year. Expression of Interest - may be used to identify research priorities or partner(s) to procure research outputs, goods/services, which are not readily defined, to clarify and refine project specifications, and commercialise research outputs Open tender - where there is potentially a large pool of possible providers. These priorities are published in the GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders). All priorities in this Investment Plan are being addressed through the open tender process or multi-stage tendering process. Other open tenders may be advertised throughout the year. Limited tender - where there is a limited pool of known possible providers, usually less than five. Providers will be contacted directly by the GRDC. Direct negotiation - where the partners already exist but contracts expire; where direct negotiation is likely to deliver the best outcome, and for example where an existing provider has demonstrated strong performance through outcomes and partnership development. Responding to the GRDC Initial responses are now sought using the tender form, which is available on the GRDC website http://www.grdc.com.au/investmentplan. Following assessment of responses, the GRDC may further negotiate project specifications with selected organisations. How does the GRDC assess tenders? For each identified priority, a tender evaluation team is formed. In most cases the tender evaluation team is a combination of Regional Panel members and GRDC managers. External experts may be contracted to provide advice to the tender evaluation team in their assessment of tenders. The team assesses each response against all selection criteria as published in the External Investment Plan. The tender evaluation team recommendations and rankings are forwarded to the regional and national panels. The panels look at the recommendations to ensure that regional and national priorities, and any issues raised during investment planning, have been adequately addressed. Where this is the case, the recommended tenderer will be invited to submit a detailed project specification to GRDC. A significant proportion of tenders received each year by GRDC are not recommended to proceed to the project specification stage. Throughout the selection process all tenders remain confidential. All staff, consultants and panel members of the GRDC are bound by confidentiality arrangements. Guidelines Please read the Guidelines on pages 12-16 of this document. These provide important information about the GRDC’s requirements in relation to submission of responses. 9 Contact Information The main phone contact number for the GRDC is +61 (2) 6166 4500. In the first instance, please direct enquiries to the contact person listed under ‘Contact Details’ for each individual Research Priority. If there is any doubt as to the correct contact for your enquiries, please email the Manager Procurement and Contracting, Cathy Stewart, c.stewart@grdc.com.au All electronic forms should only be sent to: tenders@grdc.com.au Postal address: Grains R&D Corporation PO Box 5367 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Location: Grains R&D Corporation Level 1, Tourism House, 40 Blackall Street BARTON, ACT 2600 Telephone: Facsimile: Email: Web: 02 6166 4500 02 6166 4599 tenders@grdc.com.au www.grdc.com.au Key Dates Release of the GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders) Thursday 8 September 2011 Closing date for tenders listed in the GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders) 2 PM AEST Thursday 20 October 2011 Anticipated date for formal GRDC Response December 2011 10 Guidelines for Applicants The GRDC values the capacity of our investment partners to think creatively about how they can assist in overcoming the challenges facing the Australian grains industry. Projects in which the GRDC invests are the product of a partnership between the Corporation, stakeholders and other investors to provide maximum benefit to the industry. As is appropriate for a partnership, the ultimate design of the research project is the outcome of negotiations between these parties. The publication of the GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders), therefore, is only the first part of the process by which the GRDC and partners can exchange ideas and jointly develop research projects that help to drive innovation in the Australian grains industry. The information contained in these guidelines is intended to provide a clear basis for developing a response to investment priorities published in this Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multistage Tenders), and to identify factors that may be important in any further negotiation process. Evaluation criteria Your submission will be assessed against the evaluation criteria which provide critical guidance on what you need to demonstrate to win the tender. You must address each criterion. Evaluation criteria are often weighted according to their relative importance, and of course will vary from tender to tender. Lodgement of Responses Responses to this Investment Plan are to be received at the GRDC office by 2pm AEST on Thursday 20 October 2011. All tenders must be submitted both: Electronically to tenders@grdc.com.au, using Word templates available on the GRDC website – link is http://www.grdc.com.au/investmentplan and one signed hardcopy sent to: Contracts Coordinator Grains R&D Corporation PO Box 5367 KINGSTON ACT 2604 or delivered to: Contracts Coordinator Grains R&D Corporation Level 1, Tourism House, 40 Blackall Street BARTON ACT 2600 The hard copies of tenders are to be double enveloped with the inner envelope clearly marked “Open Tender” or “Multi-stage Tender” and the Tender number and the closing date. 11 Electronic and signed copies of the proposals to be lodged Both the electronic copy and signed paper copy of each tender must be received by the GRDC by the closing date. A tender involving a number of applicants must be signed by each partner named in it as being a participant. Alternatively each participating organisation may indicate their acceptance of, and support for, the tender directly with the GRDC Contracts Coordinator (see page 10 for contact details). Tenders involving more than one partner may be lodged in counterparts. This allows each partner to individually lodge a signed copy of the same tender. The proposal must indicate which partner will be the lead organisation responsible for negotiation of the final proposal with the GRDC. The GRDC will assume, unless otherwise advised in writing, that the electronic copy and paper copy of a tender are identical. Late Tenders Any tenders received after the closing date and time will be taken to be late and may, at the GRDC’s discretion, be excluded from consideration. Joint Tenders The GRDC will consider joint tenders. This allows applicants to team up with other applicants to develop and lodge a tender. Alternative Tenders Potential partners may lodge more than one tender to the investment priorities listed in this Investment Plan. However, applicants should note that each tender will be assessed separately against the selection criteria on its own merits. Part Proposals The GRDC will consider proposals from applicants, researchers or teams to carry out only part of a project. The GRDC, however, encourages applicants in this position to consider partnering or other forms of collaboration with other potential providers to develop a complete tender. Creating Consortia The GRDC reserves the right to amalgamate components from competing tenders, by negotiation with the relevant applicants. In doing so the GRDC will comply with its obligations to protect intellectual property. Matters Concerning Tenders Ownership of Tender Documents The GRDC must retain all documents submitted in response to this Investment Plan for project evaluation purposes. All tenders will become the property of the GRDC, which may use the information for evaluation purposes, as evidence of lodgement and for the preparation of any subsequent agreement. This clause does not affect any intellectual property rights that may exist in the tender, which will not be transferred to the GRDC. 12 Applicants are considered to have: Examined the GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders), any document referred to in it and any other information made available in writing by the GRDC to potential partners for the purpose of preparing tenders Examined the Guidelines for Applicants Examined all further information which is obtainable by making reasonable enquiries relevant to the risks and other circumstances having an effect on their tender Satisfied themselves as to the correctness and sufficiency of their tender including their costing. Tenders are made on the basis that potential partners acknowledge that: They do not rely on any warranty or representation made by, or on behalf of, the GRDC, other than those expressly made in this Investment Plan, but have relied on their own inquiries in respect of the subject and their tender; The GRDC will not be responsible for the costs or expenses incurred by applicants in preparing and lodging their tenders. Assessment Process and Acceptance of Tenders Following receipt of tenders to the GRDC Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders), the Corporation will evaluate all tenders using a tender evaluation team and other experts, if appropriate. Tenders that do not address the research priorities and selection criteria as outlined in this Investment Plan 2012-13 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders), or fail to adequately demonstrate the ability to deliver outcomes to the Australian grains industry, will not progress beyond the initial assessment stage. Competitive tenders will need to be written with a view to satisfying the very stringent requirements outlined for each research priority – quality tenders and research management techniques are prerequisites for consideration. The assessment process involves the evaluation of the tender on merit as it relates to the priorities in this Investment Plan; consideration of its relationship to existing investment in a thematic area; and an overall assessment of the tender against the full GRDC portfolio. The assessment will take place in November 2011, leading up to the preparation of the GRDC’s Annual Operational Plan 2012-13 (AOP). GRDC will notify successful applicants that projects may be contracted from 1 January 2012. For tenders in this External Investment Plan, the timing of notification is expected to be no later than 31 January 2012. All contracts arising from the process will be subject to the approval of the Corporation’s Annual Operational Plan (AOP) by the Minister responsible for R&D Corporations. The GRDC will be able to enter into the contracts before approval of the AOP, but cannot make any payment until the AOP is approved by the Minister. External Review In support of its evaluation process, the GRDC reserves the right to refer a tender to an external expert for advice. If the GRDC does so it will require the external expert to sign a confidentiality deed before the GRDC provides the tender. The GRDC reserves the right not to disclose the external expert’s advice to the researcher. Obligation to accept any tender The GRDC is not obliged to accept any tender submitted. 13 GRDC Research Agreement 2012-13 The GRDC will expect to contract using the GRDC Research Agreement. The GRDC Research Agreement was reviewed in detail with key research partners in 2010 and changes incorporated into the 2011-12 Research Agreement. The 2012-13 Research Agreement should not depart significantly from the 2011-12 Agreement. The GRDC reserves the right to negotiate the terms and conditions of contracts as it deems appropriate for each project. Where the project involves more than one research organisation, it may be appropriate for the parties to use the Multi-Party Research Agreement, which is closely modelled on the Standard Research Agreement. Copies of the 2011-12 GRDC Standard and Multi-Party Research Agreement are available at www.grdc.com.au. Clarification The GRDC reserves the right to seek clarification in relation to any ambiguity or uncertainty from all or any applicants in relation to their tenders, but may decline to accept any clarification that effectively alters the tender. Negotiations In some cases, the mix of tenders received by the GRDC may indicate the need for negotiation to establish the most appropriate structure of the final investment (see Creating Consortia earlier in this section). Disclaimer This Investment Plan does not in any way commit, or otherwise oblige, the GRDC to proceed with any part described in it. Variation The GRDC reserves the right to amend this Investment Plan as it chooses. Termination The GRDC reserves the right, at its absolute and unfettered discretion, to terminate the assessment process of any or all tenders. In particular, applicants should note that the GRDC's ability to fund new investments depends on receiving sufficient levy receipts each year as well as maintaining its current and future reserves within the prudential limits. Accordingly, the GRDC may not be able to fund all or any of the projects listed in this Investment Plan 2012-2013 (Open and Multi-stage Tenders) solely on financial grounds, regardless of the quality of tenders. The GRDC's Rights Without limiting its rights at law or otherwise and notwithstanding anything else contained in this document, the GRDC reserves the right in its absolute discretion at any time to: (a) Change the structure, timing, approach, contents or requirements of the tender process (including the evaluation process) (b) Vary or extend any time or date in this document for all or any Tenderer or other persons, at any time and for such period, as the GRDC in its absolute discretion considers appropriate (c) Suspend or vary any tender process or any part of it (d) Conduct a further procurement process (e) Call for new Tender responses (f) Accept a Tender response on such terms as the GRDC in its absolute discretion accepts, without prior notice to any other Tenderer (g) Accept a Tender response, and/or enter into a Contract, for part only of the services which are the subject of this document. 14 Questions and Answers The GRDC welcomes questions from potential applicants on any of the specific research priorities in this Investment Plan. These should be submitted in writing (email preferred) to the contact details listed in the priority specifications. The GRDC will endeavour to publish the questions with answers within 3 working days on its website at http://www.grdc.com.au/investmentplan. The GRDC will not disclose the source of the questions. Questions will be accepted no later than one (1) week before the Closing Date for Receipt of Tenders. A Quick Checklist The following checklist presents some key points to consider when preparing your tender response: Do you understand all the requirements? It may sound simple, but be sure to read the tender document carefully, highlighting key points, and seek clarification, if you are uncertain about any issue. Have you planned your tender and allowed plenty of time to meet the deadline? Late tenders may not be accepted, so make sure you know where and when your tender must be lodged. If you need to form a consortium or engage sub-contractors, be sure to allow others enough time to provide input into the tender submission. Is your response straightforward and to the point? You will always need to complete the tender form. Your tender will be evaluated on content, not extravagant presentation. It is also a good idea to use simple, straightforward language and keep to the point. Have you done a spell check? Do not assume that the tender evaluation team has an implied knowledge of your methodology. Explain all acronyms. Have you addressed all mandatory conditions and evaluation criteria? It is extremely important to demonstrate that you comply with all specified conditions and that you address all the evaluation criteria and any other specified requirements. Remember, if you do not address the evaluation criteria, there is no point in submitting a tender response. Have you demonstrated value for money? Value for money is the key consideration of GRDC. Budget is obviously important, but so too are service standards, quality, performance and whole-of-life costs. The budget stated is the cap for the tender. Have you emphasized what sets you apart from your competitors? Think about how you would evaluate your tender against the evaluation criteria if you were the official responsible for assessing tender responses. You may wish to emphasis areas where you exceed the requirements, and where you feel you can add value. Your tender may be competing against several alternative proposals, so be sure to clearly identify potential points of difference from your competitors. 15 Improving Crop Yield 2.1.4.01C Australian Soybean Breeding Program Issue: Soybean is an integral component of a diverse range of cropping systems in Australia (summer and winter grains, sugar, rice, cotton and beef and dairy grazing systems). This proposed investment seeks to support the development of varieties that deliver a reliable, robust and profitable soybean phase to maximise the benefits of soybean to the farming systems and improve overall farm profits. Aim: Australian grain growers with access to new soybean varieties for irrigated and dryland production systems with maximum quality that can be supported by the specific environment in which the crop is grown. Project Description: Variety Develoment There is potential for soybeans to be used as a rotation crop in irrigated cotton areas in addition to its role as a rotation crop in the cane growing areas. The irrigated cotton region offers excellent growing conditions for high quality soybean production and has the potential to capitalise on the growing demand for high grade seed. The GRDC in partnership with industry has identified the following areas for the breeding program to focus on. This is to support an increase in annual grain production to the target of 200,000 tonnes (average over last five years just under 50,000 tonnes). Queensland Coastal and northern regions (Bundaberg to Atherton and Burdekin) Varieties with broad adaptation to planting date and latitude Darling Downs, Bundaberg and Central Queensland Focus on high value culinary grain with high yield NSW North Coast High weathering tolerance is essential for this region along with maintenance of other traits to meet high culinary markets if taken through to grain. NSW Central, Riverina and Murrumbidgee regions (irrigation areas) Early maturity required to fit into tight rotations, but also broad adaptation to planting date and the potential to produce high value grain and yields. New varieties will possess a clear hilum and specific quality attributes to match market requirements and to assist with value adding; appropriate adaptation to photoperiod; environmental conditions and disease challenges in the diverse cropping regions of Australia. New clear hilum varieties will possess desirable combinations of higher yield, better agronomic traits, broader adaptation, better disease resistance, better weathering tolerance and higher value and specific culinary or functional traits. These traits are to be benchmarked against current varieties. Variety Evaluation Evaluation will be under the auspices of the breeding program and will occur in the key target areas as identified above. This work may be undertaken by the breeding program or the breeding program may subcontract this to other providers. 16 Market access and increased profitability This proposed investment seeks to lift food-grade soybeans to higher potential specific culinary or functional quality grades and to vertically integrate varietal evaluation and selection through to the consumer. By doing so Australian soybeans will be more valuable to the processing sectors who pay a premium to growers for improved quality. Necessarily this means greater research investment in testing for specific traits and greater collaboration with the processing sector. Regional adaptation Traditional soybean varieties are quite photosensitive, that is they are adapted to a relatively narrow range of planting dates and to a narrow north-south range. With the change to specific culinary or functional types, there will be an increase in the number of varieties released. In order for the maintenance of seed stocks to be manageable it is necessary to maintain and intensify the ongoing program to remove photosensitivity from adapted varieties and replace it with crop duration governed by photoinsensitive juvenile genes so that individual varieties possess much broader adaptation to planting windows and latitude. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $500,000 per year for five years in this project. Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 2.1.4.01C Criteria 1 2.1.4.01C Criteria 2 2.1.4.01C Criteria 3 2.1.4.01C Criteria 4 2.1.4.01C Criteria 5 2.1.4.01C Criteria 6 2.1.4.01C Criteria 7 2.1.4.01C Criteria 8 2.1.4.01C Criteria 9 A sound understanding of the nature and importance of the tender to the soybean breeding program and the Australian grains industry Soundness of the experimental approach and R&D methods Mandatory Soundness of project management arrangements Mandatory Demonstrated leadership skills including the capacity to coordinate multidisciplinary research activities Demonstrated ability to communicate effectively with industry Mandatory Excellent relevant track record of the project supervisor and of all key personnel Freedom to operate for all project outputs Mandatory A clearly defined pathway for delivery of outputs to the Australian research and breeding sectors The cost effectiveness and value for money of the tender response, including cash and/or in-kind commitments from the applicants and leverage in the form of domestic or international linkages that are useful, if not essential, to progress the project Mandatory Procurement Method: Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Wendy Bosci Administrative Coordinator, Improving Crop Yield 17 w.bosci@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 Protecting Your Crop 3.2.2.01C Fungicide Evaluation Of New Generation Actives In Cereals And Pulse Crops Issue: The Australian grains industry is heavily dependent on group three demethylation inhibitors (DMIs) for cereal foliar disease control. There is a strategic need to broaden the range of actives used for disease control to manage fungicide resistance risks as well as the range of actives available to the grains. Following the severe shortages of pulse fungicides in 2010 in Australia, it is clear that a broader range of actives is required to address control options in the future to address the dependence on carbendazim and chlorthalonil. The GRDC invested in a limited efficacy study program in 2011 to determine the most effective options for future registration. This has been carried out with the support of fungicide registrants. Further trial work is required to achieve efficacy data suitable for label registration and provide growers and advisors with independent information on fungicide performance. Aim: This investment aims to reduce the future threat of fungicide shortages and broaden the range of fungicide actives to manage resistance and potential future regulatory threats. Project Description: The project will be fully scoped following a muti-stage open tender call. The project will require expertise in the delivery of field pathology and fungicide application trials. The project can use a combination of simulated and natural field pathogen infection. The project will be delivered in a 3 year period to support the submission of efficacy data to the APVMA. Objective Deliver two new pulse and two new cereal fungicide registration packages of new modes of action for use in the Australian grains industry to manage current and future fungicide resistance threats. Output 1: Delivery of a nationally coordinated program of new modes of action to existing cereal fungicide resistance threats with initial laboratory/glasshouse scoping for cross resistance to powdery mildew in barley. Deliver data packages from field trials of new modes of action of cereal and pulse foliar fungicides of both registered and un-registered products as single actives and mixtures for resistance management in a range of environments and crops including wheat, barley, chickpeas, lentils and faba beans in Northern, Southern and Western Regions. Output 2: Communication of findings (where registered) to advisors and growers via a range of GRDC communication channels and through close collaboration with farming systems groups. Develop draft guidelines for fungicide resistance management in the Australian Grains industry in collaboration with key stakeholders including CropLife Australia and member companies. Output 3: Where products are not registered, permits to be sought with further investment in good laboratory practice residue trials under the minor use program and/or engagement with registrants for label registration. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $450,000 per year for three years in this project. Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 18 3.2.2.01C Criteria 1 3.2.2.01C Criteria 2 3.2.2.01C Criteria 3 3.2.2.01C Criteria 4 3.2.2.01C Criteria 5 3.2.2.01C Criteria 6 3.2.2.01C Criteria 7 3.2.2.01C Criteria 8 An understanding of the role and value of fungicide disease management products for the Australian grains industry Detail and soundness of the approach to be taken for the three key outputs of the Tender Document Demonstrated technical knowledge and experience of the key personnel in the conduct of glasshouse, controlled environment and field studies of foliar diseases and conduct of fungicide trials for integrated disease management. Soundness of the project structure and management arrangements, including sub-contractors if applicable. Demonstrated project management and project monitoring and evaluation skills. Demonstrated ability to form productive networks and linkages to ensure coverage across Australia and build upon research already undertaken in related areas. Demonstrated ability to communicate effectively with program participants, advisors and grain growers and ability to link with other GRDC extension programs, CropLife Australia and chemical companies. The cost effectiveness and value for money of the tender response, including cash and/or in-kind commitments from the applicants and leverage in the form of domestic or international linkages that are useful, if not essential, to progress the project. Procurement Method: Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Lucinda Staley Administrative Coordinator, Protecting Your Crop 19 l.staley@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 Profitable Farming Systems 4.2.1.01C More profit from crop nutrition Issue: Fertiliser application is the largest single variable expense for growers in producing a crop (13% of total costs in 2010-11; ABARES 2011), but is also a major determinant of profit. While fertiliser prices have come down from the peak achieved in 2008 the trend continues upwards because it is either linked directly to the price of fossil fuels (for N) or high grade sources of raw materials are limited and being depleted (for P and K). A carbon tax will also increase energy costs that will further increase the price of fertilisers. Grain growers will need to manage these expensive inputs differently in the future as climate variability increases the financial risk of their use, and as cropping systems continue to evolve. Aim: This national program of research, development, extension and communication will build on the results of the current More Profit from Crop Nutrition Initiative which concludes in June 2012. The aim is to improve the return on investment from fertiliser inputs by improving the nutrient use efficiency of crops, improving the capacity of soils to supply nutrients, reducing the soils propensity to lose or lock-up nutrients and develop improved fertiliser product formulation and design including the use of potentially valuable low cost and waste inputs. The program has six key outcomes: Outcomes: 1. Make nutrient use efficiency traits available to plant breeders in adapted backgrounds. 2. Better match N,P, K and S inputs to meet crop demand and minimise losses and tie-up (Projects 1, 2, 3 & 4). 3. Make better use of micro-nutrients to correct deficiencies and enhance crop yield (Projects 5 & 6). 4. Develop and test new fertiliser products and adjuvants. 5. Provide information to growers to make effective fertiliser decisions (Project 7, 8 & 9). 6. Coordination of a program with a lasting legacy of analysed, reported and published information (Projects 10 & 11). Program description: The GRDC will manage the investment as a suite of integrated projects. The projects will be developed using a mix of procurement methods and timeframes. In the first instance Multi-stage tenders are being called for the delivery of 11 specific projects. The GRDC is calling for Expressions of Interest from organisations, groups or individuals that address the selection criteria for one or more of the projects. Each project can involve partnerships between research organisations, growers or agribusiness. Project 1 An accurate test for available soil sulfur To manage nutrient inputs you first need to be able to measure plant availability with reasonable accuracy. Soil tests for P and S in particular have been unreliable and have at best provided a broad guide to nutrient availability to the crop. An improved P test is close to commercialisation; however, a more accurate test for plant available S is required. Develop an accurate test for available soil sulfur developed if feasible. This project needs to be undertaken in three stages: 1. Candidate methods identified and compared to the current “hot KCl” method by 30 June 2014. 2. If a new method shows promise then undertake field testing by 30 June 2016. 3. If the new method has superiority over the current method then develop a commercialisation plan by 30 June 2017. 20 Project 2 Regional soil testing guidelines Regional soil testing guidelines and critical soil testing values are being developed (DAQ00148; DAV00095; UMU00035). These approaches look at each nutrient on its own, however, increasingly multiple nutrient constraints (N, P, K and S) are occurring in the one paddock. Develop GRDC regional soil testing guidelines, critical soil test values and nutrient application strategies for N, P, K and S. The range of application strategies will include the widest range of possible options including the use of foliar fertilisers. Guidelines developed with current knowledge and made available by 30 June 2013. Guidelines improved through to 30 June 2017. Project 3 - characterisation of N response curves The better fertiliser decisions project (DAN00132) has identified the paucity of data for nutrient response surfaces, especially when you move away from N and P in wheat and barley. Even for N, the regional response surfaces to calculate nitrogen use efficiency are inadequate to provide advice at local scales. A coordinated approach to capturing response surface data for the major crops (wheat, barley, canola, grain legumes and sorghum) is required. Characterise regional N response curves for optimising productivity as a factor of soil organic matter, rotation and N management. Establish a network of sites and N response surfaces in relation to soil organic matter determined through measurement and modelling by 30 June 2015. Use the information to demonstrate management of greenhouse gas emissions and to maximise nitrogen use efficiency through to 30 June 2017. Project 4 Reassessment of the value and use of fixed nitrogen As fertiliser prices rise and a carbon economy moves closer, fixed atmospheric N through legumes becomes more of an imperative in farming systems. The Crop Sequencing Initiative (CSA00029; DAS00119 and DAW00213) will provide an opportunity to allow more detailed measures of N fixation and the contribution legumes can make to overall nitrogen use efficiency and whole of system profitability. This can provide a basis for the reassessment of the value and use of fixed N under various fertiliser price scenarios. Reassess the value and use of fixed N under various fertiliser price scenarios. Identify useful datasets for example from the crop sequencing intiative by 30 June 2013. Undertake economic modelling by 30 June 2014 and strategies identified for the use of crop and pasture legumes for crop nutrition through to 30 June 2017. Project 5 Use of micronutrients There is a perception that micronutrients or trace elements are being depleted in cropping systems. It is timely to assess the extent and impact of deficiencies for micronutrients (zinc, copper, manganese, molybdenum, cobalt) on farm. If perceived deficiencies are shown to be real then identification of the environmental and management factors that may result in crops experiencing trace element deficiencies will aid in their management. Reassess the use of micronutrients through: A national survey of the extent of micronutrient (zinc, copper, managanese, molydenum, boron) deficiencies across all regions and agroecological zones with analysis against environmental and management metadata by 2013. A regional assessment of micronutrient application strategies and trace element formulations undertaken in plot and field scale in partnership with regional groups by 30 June 2015. Regional management strategies developed through to 30 June 2017. Project 6 The role of calcium A specific opportunity has been identified to make use of foliar calcium nutrition to manage and prevent the lodging of high yielding crops. Understand the role of foliar calcium in reducing cereal lodging through survey and field experimentation by 30 June 2015. Develop and communicate management recommendations if appropriate by 30 June 2016. 21 Project 7 A framework to assess profitability and risk of nutrient management strategies Models such as APSIM can be useful to integrate information from a range of sources for a range of nutrients and for the interactions between those nutrients. An economic framework can be developed that uses biophysical information and allows a range of crop nutrition and fertiliser strategies to be tested at the whole farm scale. Develop a framework for the assessment of profitability and risk of nutrient management strategies at the whole farm scale by 30 June 2015. The framework will be made available on the web and for training and communication (see project 8 and 9). The framework will be populated with the latest information through to 30 June 2017. Project 8 Extension and training Ultimately new and existing information on crop nutrition needs to be integrated in a way to allow growers and their advisors to make effective fertiliser decisions. Information needs to be relevant and timely to a specific paddock and farm business. Regional crop nutrition experts cannot be on call to all farmers. Crop Updates are an important forum but short courses that provide more comprehensive training with opportunities to try it at “home” and come back for follow up will help to develop advisors and lead growers into crop nutrition experts at least in their own district and on their own farm. Develop a national approach to extension and training by 30 June 2013 – including updates and short courses based in the first instance on existing information and on new information as the initiative progresses Deliver the extension and training program through to 30 June 2017. Project 9 Communication strategy Importantly, the program will provide a lasting legacy of analysed reported and published information in accessible reports and scientific papers in refereed journals all available and accessible on the web. A communication strategy developed by 30 June 2013 and delivered through to 30 June 2017 including publications, website and mobile device applications. The strategy will cover existing information in the first instance and new information as the program progresses. Project 10 Program coordination Part of the success of the current More Profit from Crop Nutrition Initiative has been the national coordination provided through CSA00021. This has provided for the peer review of project specifications and progress reports, the coordination of communication, modelling and economic analysis efforts, an annual meeting to critique project performance and emerging ideas and identification of capacity gaps. Such an approach will remain crucial to the delivery of outputs in a new phase of the program. Interest is sought from organisations capable of coordinating the More Profit from Crop Nutrition Program. This can be undertaken along with the delivery of other projects or as a project on its own. Project 11 Post doctoral fellow in the Western Region Crop nutrition research capacity in the Western Region has been reduced with the recent and empending retirement of key senior scientists. Interest is sought from organisations capable of attracting a high calibre post doctoral fellow for a three year term commencing in early 2012 to undertake research in improved in season N and P management, greater agronomic effectiveness of N fertilisers and improved knowledge of relationships between soil amendments and microbial function. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $4,100,000 per year for five years in this program. 22 Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below. Tenderers may wish to address the selection criteria for one or more of the projects. All tenderers must address all of the generic selection criteria: 4.2.1.01C Criteria 1 4.2.1.01C Criteria 2 4.2.1.01C Criteria 3 4.2.1.01C Criteria 4 4.2.1.01C Criteria 5 4.2.1.01C Criteria 6 4.2.1.01C Criteria 7 Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 3 Project 4 Project 5 Project 7 Project 8 Project 9 Project 10 Project 10 Project 11 Generic criteria to be addressed in all expressions of interest Presentation of a clear plan on how the project(s) will be undertaken including which nutrients, crops and regions will be targeted and a detailed budget. An understanding of the nature of the issue to the Australian grains industry. Demonstrated ability to function and communicate as part of a complex R, D and E team. Demonstrated soundness of the project structure and management arrangements, including sub-contractors if applicable. Demonstrated project management and project monitoring and evaluation skills. Demonstrated ability to form productive networks and linkages to ensure regional and national coverage and build upon research already undertaken in related areas. The cost effectiveness and value for money of the tender response, including cash and/or in-kind commitments from the applicants and leverage in the form of domestic or international linkages that are useful, if not essential, to progress the project. Specific criteria to be addressed for particular projects Demonstrated experience in the development of soil tests. Demonstrated ability to develop and deliver regional nutrient guidelines and strategies. Demonstrated understanding of the nitrogen cycle and approaches to improve nitrogen use efficiency in the field. Demonstrated ability to undertake regional crop nutrition trials. Demonstrated ability to source information on fixed N and a capacity to undertake economic analysis. Demonstrated experience in desk top and field survey, crop nutrition experimentation and development of regional nutrient guidelines and strategies. Demonstrated experience in biophysical and economic modelling. Demonstrated experience in developing and delivering technical training material, ideally in crop nutrition, to grain growers and their advisors. Demonstrated experience in developing and delivering technical, ideally in crop nutrition, communication strategies to growers and their advisors. Demonstrated experience in coordinating complex agricultural R, D and E programs. Demonstrated capacity to provide coordination and leadership to a diverse group of scientists, advisors and technical experts to deliver crop nutrition outcomes to grain growers. Demonstrated ability to attract, lead and inspire postdoctoral fellows in soil and crop nutrition. Procurement Method: Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory for Project 1 Mandatory for Project 2 Mandatory for Project 3 Mandatory for project 3 Mandatory for project 4 Mandatory for project 5 Mandatory for Project 7 Mandatory for Project 8 Mandatory for Project 9 Mandatory for Project 10 Mandatory for project 10 Mandatory for project 11 Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Wendy Bosci Administrative Coordinator, Profitable Farming Systems 23 w.bosci@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 4.3.1.01C Nitrogen Fixation in Farming Systems Issue: The National Rhizobium Program has demonstrated an industry wide issue of poor legume N2 fixation due to inoculation failures in some areas, suboptimal inoculation outcomes and declining N2 fixation in Australian pasture systems. Overcoming the abiotic and biotic limitations to biological N2 fixation and the development of effective strains of rhizobia for new legume genotypes is imperative to satisfy the demand for N in sustainable agricultural production systems in the future. Nitrogen from Rhizobial N-fixation is still the cheapest form of input nutrient available in farming systems. Increasing global demand for food production and higher energy costs associated with the production and application of nitrogen fertilisers, combined with the need to reduce carbon emissions will see the reliance on biological N2 fixation increase. While significant advances in the science behind N-fixation have been made in the last decade we have yet to see the benefits fully realised in the field. Aim: This national program of R,D & E will build on the results of the past three generations of the National Rhizobium Program which concludes in June 2012. The aim is to quantitatively increase the amount and utilisation of nitrogen from legume/rhizobial symbiosis in farming systems. Individually focused projects (5-8) managed and coordinated under an overarching national strategy will ensure the scientific discipline by regional matrix is effectively delivered. Five years of funding for the program is being applied to provide longer term stability and a more comprehensive strategy. The program will have a number of projects of less than five years giving the opportunity for review and refocus in core areas. The first activity of the program will be the development of a strategy and benchmarking survey. Projects within the program will seek different levels of leverage depending on the direct alignment of each with GRDC strategy. In particular, projects focusing predominantly on pasture legumes will require alternative cash input from the other RDCs with GRDC making up no more than 25% of the total equity. Program Description: Project 1: Benchmarking the Outcomes and Impacts of Nitrogen Fixation. Background The last comprehensive survey of the outcomes and impacts of nitrogen fixation was done in the late 1990’s. This project will bookend the program with comprehensive benchmarking information on the uptake, use, effectiveness and outcomes from nitrogen fixation in Australian farming systems. Outputs: Quantitative measurement through surveying of the uptake, use, effectiveness and impact of inoculant use on a region by region basis. Measurement of the effectiveness and impact of two decades of investment in rhizobial research. Recommendations for research, development and extension activities likely to have a significant increase in the outcomes from nitrogen fixation. Project 2: Coordinator – Nitrogen Fixation Program (0.2-0.3FTE). Funding likely to begin in January 2012 Responsibilities/Outputs: Develop a NFP business plan that includes a national vision, objectives, strategies, targets, monitoring and evaluation plan. Develop a NFP extension and education plan that disseminates NFP outputs and messages to end users. Identify the key messages and coordinate the extension personnel to provide an effective communication program. Develop a process to evaluate the effectiveness of the communication plan. 24 Collaboration with Nutrient Improvement Project outcome “Reassessment of the value and use of fixed N under various fertiliser price scenarios”. Coordinate and monitor the NFP projects and report annually to the GRDC and other stakeholders. Identify cross industry shared investment opportunities for NFP projects and secure outside funding where appropriate. Coordinate NFP scientific meetings to ensure communication between NFP and industry. Coordinate the legacy of analysed reported and published information in accessible reports and scientific papers in refereed journals Project 3: Extension of Nitrogen Fixation Program Outputs to End Users Background: During the last two decades the National Rhizobium Program (NRP) has been built on cooperation and collaboration between Australian rhizobiologists based at several key centres across the nation. The expertise and knowledge base of the NRP currently resides in the key rhizobiologists located across the nation (CRS - Howieson, O’Hara, Yates, Brau; SARDI/UA – Ballard, Denton; QDEEDI – Seymour; Sydney U – Deaker). To maximise benefits from past, current and future research outcomes there is a need for the outputs from the NRP to be coordinated into key messages and extended to growers to improve legume N utility by adoption of various techniques. Applicants able to leverage this investment through funding from other RDC’s and institutions will be preferred. Outcomes: A 20% increase in the uptake of rhizobial inoculants resulting in an increase in the amount of nitrogen in the cropping systems from N-fixation. A 50% reduction in reported inoculation failures and suboptimal inoculation responses. Key communicators trained in NRP outcomes and techniques and provided with supplementary aids to extend NRP key messages to growers. Messages extended and techniques adopted. Understanding of the adoption of the techniques and feedback to key communicators to refine their messages if appropriate. Outputs: Key messages and techniques for extension to growers distilled from the proposed ‘Handbook on Rhizobia and Inoculation of Legumes’ due for publication in November 2011. An extension plan that communicates key messages and techniques to growers and consultants across all key regions. Regional workshops in collaboration with Pulse Breeding Australia delivering information about inoculation and N-fixation in the context pulse and pasture cropping. Implementation of the extension plan via appropriate delivery channels. May include training for regional agronomists and consultants, development of complementary aids such as factsheets and/or applications etc Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the extension program. May include the utility of focus groups or grower surveys to assess uptake of key messages and techniques. Projects: 4-7 Open Expression of Interest Applicants are invited to submit projects of between three and five years for inclusion within the N-Fixation Program. The projects will be assessed by GRDC together with the NFixation coordinator. While the submission format is flexible they should clearly address the following output and outcome objectives. Detailed budgets should be supplied covering potential investment from all parties. 25 Areas of specific interest to the GRDC Support of the breeding activities of PBA and other legume breeders to ensure new varieties are compatible with commercial rhizobial strains with the ultimate goal of creation of breeding objectives based on a N-Fixation index for each variety. Improving the N-Fixation performance of grain and forage legumes for better productivity in the tropics & sub-tropics. Exploitation of rhizobial genomes for practical outcomes such as broader host range and better genetic stability. Outputs: Specific and measurable outputs from the project, including who they will be delivered to, where and how. Outcomes: How will the project ultimately benefit Australian Grain Growers? How will the outputs be converted to outcomes and by whom and how? Proposed Investment: Applicants are invited to apply for each of the individual projects within this program separately. Clearly define the funds being sought in each year of the program. The GRDC expects to invest up to $800,000 in 2012-13 and 2016-17 and $700,000 in 201314, 2014-15 and 2015-16 in this initiative. Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 4.3.1.01C Criteria 1 4.3.1.01C Criteria 2 4.3.1.01C Criteria 3 4.3.1.01C Criteria 4 4.3.1.01C Criteria 5 4.3.1.01C Criteria 6 4.3.1.01C Criteria 7 4.3.1.01C Criteria 8 A sound understanding of the nature and importance of the tender to the Australian grains industry Soundness of the project approach and R&D methods to be employed including strong statistical support Soundness of project management arrangements Mandatory Demonstrated leadership skills including the capacity to coordinate multidisciplinary research activities Excellent relevant track record of the project supervisor and of all key personnel Demonstrated technical knowledge and experience of all key personnel Mandatory A clearly defined pathway for delivery of outputs to the Australian Grain industry. The cost effectiveness and value for money of the tender response, including cash and/or in-kind commitments from the applicants and leverage in the form of domestic or international linkages that are useful, if not essential, to progress the project Mandatory Procurement Method: Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Wendy Bosci Administrative Coordinator, Profitable Farming Systems 26 w.bosci@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 Maintaining the Farm Resource Base 5.2.1.01C Improved Management of Soil Organic Matter for Profitable and Sustainable Cropping Issue: It is likely that by 2012 growers will be operating in a carbon economy. The Carbon Farming Initiative (CFI) and the Clean Energy Future Plan will increase the importance of understanding organic matter and organic carbon and their role in the farming system. Growers will need to be able to accurately measure their soil organic carbon stocks; know what potential their soil has to sequester carbon; understand the impact of their farming system on stocks of organic matter and emissions of nitrous oxide; and understand the role of organic matter for soil function and profitability. Aim: This national program of research, development and extension aims to increase growers’ certainty about the value of soil organic matter to their farming system and the levels required to remain profitable and sustainable in the emerging carbon economy. The program has four key outcomes: 1. A nationally recognised and CFI approved set of protocols for measuring and monitoring soil organic carbon on-farm published and available to farmers and their advisors. 2. Growers and their advisers will have access to tools and information based on peer-reviewed data to estimate the upper limit of carbon sequestration for their environment, soils and cropping systems; whether their farming system and management is increasing, decreasing or maintaining soil organic carbon; and the impact of management practices on labile carbon, available nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions in cropping systems. 3. Quantification of the link between the different fractions of soil organic carbon and soil functions such as water holding capacity, nutrient cycling and soil structure. 4. Tools and information developed to help growers and their advisers calculate the costs and benefits of managing and building soil organic matter. Program Description: The program is split into seven projects. The GRDC will manage the investment as a suite of integrated projects. The GRDC is calling for Tenders from organisations, groups or individuals that address the selection criteria for one or more of the projects. Each project can involve partnerships between research organisations, growers or agribusiness. Project Description: Project 1. Coordination and extension Coordinate the program of research, development and extension to ensure: Delivery or R&D outcomes to the grain growers in the GRDC agroecological zones. A consistent approach to measurement and interpretation. Coordination of the extension, communication, modelling and economic efforts. Peer review project specifications and progress reports. Peer review project performance and findings in an annual meeting. A legacy of analysed and published information in accessible reports and scientific papers in refereed journals The coordination project will be required to develop a communication and extension plan and a monitoring and evaluation plan. The project will also be responsible for monitoring the projects and ensuring they report annually to the GRDC and other stakeholders. 27 The coordination project may also identify opportunities for additional funding where appropriate. This can be undertaken as a project on its own or with the delivery of other projects. Project 2. Desktop study By 30 April 2012, a desktop study of the literature and underlying data describing the: Link between soil organic matter and soil function Potential to develop pedo-transfer functions Project 3. Measuring carbon stock By 30 June 2013, nationally agreed protocols for paddock scale on-farm testing and monitoring of organic carbon stock, published in plain english and available to grain growers. The protocols will specify: • How and when growers need to measure soil carbon (by 31 March 2012). • How often and at what scale to measure soil carbon to account for spatial and temporal variability (by 31 March 2012). • How the uncertainty (error) associated with soil carbon stock measurements could be treated in carbon accounting systems (by December 2012). • If precision agriculture technology can be used to measure soil carbon or aid in predicting spatial and temporal variations. These protocols will be compatible with those being developed by the National Carbon Accounting System (NCAS) for the Carbon Farming Initiative and relevant for both on-farm monitoring and for trading and offset purposes. Project 4. National publication By 30 June 2013, a national publication – ‘Managing soil organic matter on-farm’ – written, compiled, printed and distributed to farmers and agronomists. The publication will be no longer than 100 pages. It will synthesise and explain current knowledge and ensure science-based messages are used to inform management. The publication will summarise the current research on soil organic matter, in particular: • How carbon cycles and its effect on profitability. • The amount of organic carbon and nutrients (N, P, S) in soil organic matter. • The link between organic matter, labile carbon, available soil nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions in cropping systems. • Whether management (burning/pulse crops/tillage/pasture) increases, decreases or maintains soil organic carbon. It will have relevance to all grains regions but identify regional differences Project 5. Carbon sequestration By 30 June 2014, identification and publication of the potential of the major soils and managment systems in each of the grains regions to sequester organic carbon. This will be a technical potential, defined by soil type and environment. Important research questions are: • How much carbon is it possible to sequester in different soil types and with different management and how vulnerable is the sequestered carbon to subsequent change? • What management practices increase soil carbon? • What is the effect of management (strategic tillage, stubble burning, rotations) on organic matter and organic carbon? • What role will legume-based nitrogen play in carbon cycling and sequestration? • What are the benefits and trade-offs of increasing soil carbon? Project 6. Soil carbon functionality By 30 June 2016, published benchmarks for the major soil types which identify the amount and quality of soil organic matter needed to maintain key soil functions (structure, waterholding, nutrient availability) and therefore plant growth under different farming systems and practices. Important questions are: • At what level of soil carbon do you start losing key soil functions (structure, water-holding, nutrient availability) and therefore impact on crop production and profitability? • How do optimal levels of soil carbon change with soil type and environmental conditions? • Can we preferentially accumulate particular forms of carbon to improve particular functions? This information will also be used to improve the capability of simulation models to model carbon and define the impact on soil functions. 28 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Identify the soil types for inclusion and prioritise them in terms of extent and value to grains cropping. Identify the soil organic matter functions that are important to those soils and how to characterise them. Develop the relationships for the high priority soil types by 2016. Extend work to additional soil types by 2017. Project 7. Economics and risk Development of a region, soil type and environment specific web-based tool (compatible with FullCAM) to: • calculate the change in soil carbon stock from different management techniques • predict the impact of environmental conditions, soil properties and farm management practice on the stocks of soil organic carbon and its component fractions • estimate the amount of soil organic matter and its fractions needed for soil functioning • calculate the cost of options available to increase soil organic matter Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 By 30 June 2015, a web-based tool to calculate the change in soil carbon stock from different management techniques. It will take into account region, soil type, rainfall and environmental constraints and the effect on greenhouse gas emissions. By 30 June 2015, development and validation of a computer modelling system capable of predicting the impact of environmental conditions, soil properties and farm management practice on the stocks of soil organic carbon and its component fractions. By 30 June 2017, incorporation of the expressions relating the amount of soil organic matter and its fractions to soil functioning within the modelling framework developed in Task 5. By 30 June 2017, inclusion of an economic model to allow growers to calculate the cost of options available to increase soil organic matter. The model needs to calculate the amount and cost of N, P and S needed to increase soil carbon and the carbon price required to make carbon sequestration profitable (including all potential productivity benefits). Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $4.25 million over the next five years in this program. Applicants are invited to apply for each of the individual projects within this program separately. Applications must clearly define the funds being sought in each year of the program. Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Selection Criteria tabulated below. Tenderers may wish to address the selection criteria for one or more of the tasks. All tenderers must address all of the generic selection criteria 5.2.1.01C Criterion 1 5.2.1.01C Criterion 2 5.2.1.01C Criterion 3 5.2.1.01C Criterion 4 5.2.1.01C Criterion 5 Presentation of a clear plan on how the task(s) will be undertaken including a detailed budget. Mandatory Soundness of the project structure and management arrangements, including sub-contractors if applicable. Mandatory Demonstrated project management and project monitoring and evaluation skills. Mandatory Track record, technical knowledge and experience of the project supervisor and of all key personnel Mandatory A clearly defined plan for delivery of outputs to the Australian research and extension sectors as well as to Australian grain growers in each of the GRDC Agro-ecological zones. Mandatory 29 5.2.1.01C Criterion 6 5.2.1.01C Criterion 7 5.2.1.01C Criterion 8 Demonstrated ability to form productive networks and linkages to ensure coverage across Australia and build on research already undertaken in related areas and to link with other GRDC climate change programs. Mandatory Demonstrated ability to communicate effectively with program participants, advisors and grain growers. Mandatory The cost effectiveness and value for money of the tender response, including cash and/or in-kind commitments from the applicants and leverage in the form of domestic or international linkages that are useful, if not essential, to progress the project. Mandatory Specific criteria for each task 5.2.1.01C Criterion 9 Demonstrated leadership skills including the capacity to coordinate complex, multi-disciplinary research teams. Mandatory for Project 1 5.2.1.01C Demonstrated experience delivering extension programs to grain growers. Mandatory for Project 1 Demonstrated understanding of the Carbon Farming Initiative and the National Carbon Accounting System (NCAS). Mandatory for Project 3 Demonstrated experience writing high impact extension publications for grain growers including an ability to write about complex issues in plain English. Mandatory for Project 4 Identification and prioritisation of the major cropping soils, rotations and management systems to be studied. Mandatory for Project 5, 6 & 7 Demonstrated experience using the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM). Mandatory for Project 5 Demonstrated understanding of FullCAM, particularly the CAMAg and Roth C models. Mandatory for Project 7 Demonstrated experience developing and validating biophysical and economic modelling tools. Mandatory for Project 7 Criterion 10 5.2.1.01C Criterion 11 5.2.1.01C Criterion 12 5.2.1.01C Criterion 13 5.2.1.01C Criterion 14 5.2.1.01C Criterion 15 5.2.1.01C Criterion 16 Procurement Method: Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Wendy Bosci Administrative Coordinator, Maintaining the Farm Resource Base 30 w.bosci@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 Building Skills and Capacity 6.2.4.01C Graduate Certificate And Diploma In Sustainable Grains Production For Industry Advisers And Growers. Issue: The grains industry and farming community makes use of many people in advisory roles and, at times, these advisors can have limited knowledge of grains production systems. This is particularly the case with new and inexperienced participants in the industry who may have been exposed to relatively little grains information during their training, even at tertiary levels. While many will develop their knowledge and expertise in the industry over time, there are concerns about the range of information and issues they are exposed to, particularly if they are based in smaller centres and when staff turnover is high. This project will ensure that they develop a broader and more balanced understanding of complex industry issues more quickly than would otherwise occur, and be exposed to the latest research undertaken by GRDC. Aim: The aims of the Sustainable Grains Production course are to build at least 180 new students within the grains industry over the next three years across the Northern and Southern grains regions, and to accelerate the adoption of research and extension that improves the economic and environmental performance of the grains industry. This will be acheived by providing: post graduate and undergraduate part time training with competency to both Graduate Certificate and Gradute Diploma levels coursework mapped to enable credit of units for further studies (e.g. Degrees) regular and relevant redevelopment of course material development of an online monitoring system with the GRDC to track candidates during and post study increased engagement of agribusiness in the program both in course material development and presentation of practical experience regular involvement of researchers and industry experts in the program Project Description: This project provides grain specific training for advisers, farmers and others within the Northern and Southern grains regions. Industry advisers play an increasingly important role in assisting producers in decision making and the adoption of new technology, and it is vital that they have a sound understanding of the underlying principles of grain production, and are exposed to new research findings and industry initiatives to ensure their roles in industry under different disciplines and capacities are of the highest quality. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $332,000 per year ($166,000 per region) for three years in this project in the GRDC Northern and Southern Regions. Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 6.2.4.01C Criteria 1 6.2.4.01C Criteria 2 6.2.4.01C Criteria 3 6.2.4.01C A sound understanding of the nature and importance of the tender to the Australian grains industry Demonstrated capability to attract and retain students into the programs, with at least 60 candidates per annum Demonstrated evidence that coursework is of a high standard that will attract students, is mapped to appropriate competency standards and includes both theoretical and practical application Demonstrated ability to regularly monitor and evaluate student attitudes 31 Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Criteria 4 6.2.4.01C Criteria 5 6.2.4.01C Criteria 6 6.2.4.01C Criteria 7 6.2.4.01C Criteria 8 6.2.4.01C Criteria 9 6.2.4.01C Criteria 10 to the program including (but not limited to): marketing of the course; satisfaction levels of coursework and delivery, relevance of the coursework to their career; currency of the information; use of innovative delivery methods. Provision of the findings annually to the GRDC. Ability to annually review and evaluate, in conjunction with the GRDC, the curriculum to ensure content is current and consistent with latest research, development and extension findings and the delivery is innovative. Soundness of project management arrangements, including a clearly defined plan of activities to ensure success of the program Ability to develop and share a database of candidates with the GRDC and monitor candidates post graduation to measure areas of retention by industry, with quarterly reports to the GRDC Demonstrated leadership and experience of the project supervisor and of all key personnel, including evidence of technical knowledge and the capacity to coordinate multidisciplinary learning activities. Evidence of a clearly defined pathway for delivery of the course and placement of candidates in the Australian research and advisory sectors The cost effectiveness and value for money of the tender response, including cash and/or in-kind commitments from the applicants and leverage in the form of domestic or international linkages that are useful, if not essential, to progress the project Procurement Method: Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Merrilyn Baulman Administrative Coordinator, Building Skills and Capacity 32 m.baulman@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 Grower Services 7.2.3.01C Northern Agribusiness Trial Extension Network Issue: The GRDC’s investment in farming systems projects with grower groups currently addresses a range of issues in the local areas surrounding these groups. There remains the opportunity however, to meet the extension needs of smaller more localised groups and individual growers outside these areas. In recognising these needs the GRDC is calling for tenders that target areas not currently being directly addressed by GRDC supported farming systems projects with the view of coordinating minor trial and extension programs with local agribusiness. Aim: The aim of this initiative is to enhance communication and extension activities between private agronomists, agribusiness and local growers based around agronomic trials in targeted areas of the GRDC’s Northern Region. Ideally it will also encourage coordinated communication and extension activities between private agronomists, agribusiness and local grower networks. The initiative will consist of four individual projects on issue-based agronomic trials throughout the GRDC’s Northern cropping region during the 2012 season. The actual agronomic issues that are to be addressed through this project are to be detailed in the individual applications. Project Description: Part of an agribusiness agronomist’s time will be contracted to develop, conduct and deliver key research trials and associated communication and extension activities. The tender responses should include a trial plan outlining the issue that they will be investigating and its relevance to the local area. These trials will ideally be based around specific tactical issues such as soil health, crop nutrition, rotations, spray application or the identification and management of cereal diseases. Generic variety evaluation will not be considered as a research issue in this specific initiative. A key feature of these projects will be the provision of an extension network by the private agribusiness companies, working in close collaboration with the GRDC and the trials themselves. This network will be based around existing groups rather than the formation of new groups. The GRDC is seeking tenders from interested parties to carry out the services listed below for a period of 12 months. The GRDC may however consider extending individual contracts depending on their respective performance. The GRDC through this open tender seeks up to four suitable contractors to: Locate, design, conduct and communicate agronomic experiments in accordance to trial guidelines available from the GRDC website* Improve communication and extension of research outcomes and activities from localised experiments through agronomists, private sector advisers and grower groups Interpret experiment data and apply practical applications in accordance to trial guidelines available from the GRDC website* Provide an economic analysis on the results from the trials Develop consistent and targeted agronomic communication and extension around these trials Ensure that information for growers and advisers is current and accessible Increase the understanding of the potential of these trials as part of their farming system Conduct open days, field walks and speak at field days, GRDC Updates etc Deliver agronomic extension that will enhance farm and crop management best practice particularly in relation to the issues being investigated in the trials. 33 Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $100,000 for four individual projects within the GRDC’s Northern Region during 2012, up to $25,000 per project. Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of responses to tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 7.2.3.01C Criteria 1 7.2.3.01C Criteria 2 7.2.3.01C Criteria 3 7.2.3.01C Criteria 4 Extent of tenderers understanding of trial guidelines available from the GRDC website. * Quality of the trial plan and issue to be investigated in the trial. Mandatory Access to grain grower and grains industry networks. Mandatory Cost effectiveness of the proposal, including cash and in – kind commitments from tenderers. Mandatory Mandatory * Trial guidelines are available from www.grdc.com.au/trialguidelines Procurement Method: Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Maureen Cribb Manager Publications, Grower Services m.cribb@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 34 7.2.3.02C Western Agribusiness Trial Extension Network Issue: The GRDC’s investment in grower group-based projects currently addresses a range of issues in the local areas surrounding these groups. There is still the opportunity however, to meet the extension needs of smaller more localised grower groups and individual growers outside these areas. In recognising these needs the GRDC is calling for tenders that target areas not currently being directly addressed by GRDC supported farming systems projects with the view of coordinating minor trial and extension programs with local agribusiness. Aim: The aim of this initiative is to enhance communication and extension activities between private agronomists, agribusiness and local growers based around agronomic trials in targeted areas of the GRDC’s Western Region. Ideally it will also encourage coordinated communication and extension activities between private agronomists, agribusiness and local grower networks. The initiative will consist of six individual projects on issue-based agronomic trials throughout the GRDC’s Western cropping region during the 2012 season. The actual agronomic issues that are to be addressed through this project are to be detailed in the individual applications. Project Description: Part of an agribusiness agronomist’s time will be contracted to develop, conduct and deliver key research trials and associated communication and extension activities. The tender responses should include a trial plan outlining the issue that they will be investigating and its relevance to the local area. These trials will ideally be based around specific tactical issues such as soil health, crop nutrition, rotations, spray application or the identification and management of cereal diseases. Generic variety evaluation will not be considered as a research issue in this specific initiative. A key feature of these projects will be the provision of an extension network by the private agribusiness companies, working in close collaboration with the GRDC and the trials themselves. This network will be based around existing groups rather than the formation of new groups. The GRDC is seeking tenders from interested parties to carry out the services listed below for a period of 12 months. The GRDC may however consider extending individual contracts depending on their respective performance. The GRDC through this open tender seeks up to six suitable contractors to: Locate, design, conduct and communicate agronomic experiments in accordance to trial guidelines available from the GRDC website* Improve communication and extension of research outcomes and activities from localised experiments through agronomists, private sector advisers and grower groups Interpret experiment data and apply practical applications in accordance to trial guidelines available from the GRDC website* Provide an economic analysis on the results from the trials Develop consistent and targeted agronomic communication and extension around these trials Ensure that information for growers and advisers is current and accessible Increase the understanding of the potential of these trials as part of their farming system Conduct open days, field walks and speak at field days, GRDC Updates etc Deliver agronomic extension that will enhance farm and crop management best practice particularly in relation to the issues being investigated in the trials. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $150,000 for six individual projects within the GRDC’s Western Region during 2012, $25,000 per project. 35 Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of responses to tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 7.2.3.02C Criteria 1 7.2.3.02C Criteria 2 7.2.3.02C Criteria 3 7.2.3.02C Criteria 4 Extent of tenderers understanding of trial guidelines available from the GRDC website. * Quality of the trial plan and issue to be investigated in the trial. Mandatory Access to grain grower and grains industry networks. Mandatory Cost effectiveness of the proposal, including cash and in – kind commitments from tenderers. Mandatory Mandatory * Trial guidelines are available from www.grdc.com.au/trialguidelines Procurement Method: Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Maureen Cribb Manager Publications, Grower Services m.cribb@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 36 7.2.4.01C Technical Workshops – Northern Region Issue: The GRDC has recently held a number of workshops to develop the skills of advisers, researchers and growers in addressing issue specific challenges facing the grains industry. As the desire for information continues to grow, segments of the grains industry are requesting greater levels of technical detail. The Technical Workshops sought through this request for tender are to be designed with a specific focus on delivering highly detailed insights into key grains R, D and E issues. Aim: The project will deliver a series of coordinated and detailed technical information workshops across the Northern grains region. This will involve the delivery of specialised technical workshops to enable more effective communication and extension of cutting edge research for end users. This investment will enable the GRDC and its partners to development technical training materials for the delivery of focussed training to targeted segments of the grains industry and stakeholders. Project Description: The GRDC has recently run a series of workshops to develop the skills of advisers, researchers and growers in addressing specific challenges facing the grains industry. Topics supported to date include weed management, canopy management, foliar disease management, grain quality and NVT training. The GRDC wishes to engage a suitably qualified and experienced person(s) or company to work with the GRDC to further develop technical workshops for growers, advisers and other industry representatives in the GRDC Northern Region. A key feature of these projects will be to work in close collaboration with the GRDC and researchers themselves. Topics identified for workshop applications in the Northern Region are: Peanut agronomy Weed resistance – outlining costs benefits of best practice vs. bad practice – targeting groups Stubble management Best use of limited water Irrigation management Foliar disease management Nutrition of winter and summer crops Crop physiology – nutrition based on sound science Soil nutrition – cropping specific Weeds; round-up, hard to kill and water quality in controlling weeds Spray drift and water quality Fungicide application PA bringing it all together Drivers of farm profitability Soils and crop rotation effects on abiotic and biotic stresses Other topics identified by the applicant if substantiated to GRDC. It is expected that the applicant will facilitate the delivery of the workshops to industry segments and will be responsible for arranging all administrative and logistical requirements of the workshops. Workshop delivery will include an emphasis on the delivery of information to and from growers, consultants, agribusiness and other industry customers. The applicant is expected to demonstrate the methodology of intended workshops is appropriate to ensure that uptake and adoption is maximised. To complement existing events it is proposed that this investment will improve access and discussion of highly technical information, which will be subsequently disseminated widely across the grains industry by both the applicant and the GRDC. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $30,000 for up to one individual workshop series within the GRDC’s Northern Region with a review at the conclusion of the workshops to determine next steps. 37 Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 7.2.4.01C Criteria 1 An understanding of the nature and importance of the tender to the Northern grains industry 1.1 Demonstrated understanding and ability to address the issue(s) proposed for the workshop(s) 1.2 Clear linkages with proposed target audiences (e.g. agribusiness, consultants, other industry institutions/representatives) – including proposed target audience, numbers of participants, entry costs (if applicable) and methods for delivery 1.3 Demonstrated understanding of the need for these workshops Demonstrated ability to attract relevant presenters from GRDC-funded research projects or the broader agricultural and business sectors to reflect the topic(s) proposed including opportunities to make presenters from workshops available for other GRDC based events. Mandatory Mandatory 7.2.4.01C Criteria 6 Soundness of the proposed workshop delivery methods and project management arrangements, including 3.1 Outline the frequency, location and repetition of workshop(s) for the Northern Region 3.2 Projected participant numbers per workshop 3.3 Demonstrated ability to schedule face to face technical workshops in a planned way to meet timing and geographical location requirements to maximise participation by proposed target audiences 3.4 Demonstrated access and ability to collaborate with grain grower, adviser, research providers, agribusiness and other agricultural industry networks. 3.5 Demonstrated ability to coordinate all administrative tasks involved including venues, catering, travel and accommodation arrangements for participants 3.6 Demonstrated ability to integrate into workshop programs technical aspects with environmental sustainability, farm profitability and implications for business management (e.g. financial considerations) 3.7 Demonstrated ability to widely promote the workshop including via GRDC diary dates (www.grdc.com.au/diarydates) and communication mechanisms 3.8 Demonstrated ability to maintain/facilitate follow up action/support with participants after the workshop Development of pre and post key performance adoption indicators/targets and methods for measurement and evaluation on a per workshop basis, including the development and provision of a report at the conclusion of the workshop for publication on the GRDC website and for use in other GRDC extension mechanisms and provision of workshop participant contact details to the GRDC in electronic format. Demonstrated ability to use workshop materials as training tools. The cost effectiveness of the tender response including cash and a detailed overview of in-kind commitments from the applicants. Costs should be itemised per workshop. This includes the ability to actively seek and leverage sponsorship opportunities. Contact details of at least three referees who are familiar with the tenderer’s previous work in providing similar services. 7.2.4.01C Criteria 7 Identify innovative and other value added options that are cost effective and deliver value for money Mandatory 7.2.4.01C Criteria 2 7.2.4.01C Criteria 3 7.2.4.01C Criteria 4 7.2.4.01C Criteria 5 Procurement Method: Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Maureen Cribb Manager Publications, Grower Services m.cribb@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 38 7.2.4.02C Technical Workshops – Southern Region Issue: The GRDC has recently held a number of workshops to develop the skills of advisers, researchers and growers in addressing issue specific challenges facing the grains industry. As the desire for information continues to grow, segments of the grains industry are requesting greater levels of technical detail. The Technical Workshops sought through this request for tender are to be designed with a specific focus on delivering highly detailed insights into key grains R, D and E issues. Aim: The project will deliver a minimum of three series of coordinated and detailed technical information workshops across the Southern grains region. This will involve the delivery of specialised technical workshops to enable more effective communication and extension of cutting edge research for end users. This investment will enable the GRDC and its partners to development technical training materials for the delivery of focussed training to targeted segments of the grains industry and stakeholders. Project Description: The GRDC has recently run a series of workshops to develop the skills of advisers, researchers and growers in addressing specific challenges facing the grains industry. Topics supported to date include weed management, canopy management, foliar disease management, grain quality and NVT training The GRDC wishes to engage a suitably qualified and experienced person(s) or company to work with the GRDC to further develop technical workshops for growers, advisers and other industry representatives in the GRDC Southern Region. A key feature of these projects will be to work in close collaboration with the GRDC and researchers themselves. Topics identified for workshop applications in the Southern Region are: Disc seeding systems – including relationship with chemicals and disc seeding systems Using yield maps to assess large scale trials and to map crop variability Using variable rate inputs for a better economic outcome Managing seed quality for re-seeding NVT training Understanding grain quality Pest management in no-till farming systems Foliar disease management Hygiene management in grain storages Plant physiology workshops – cereals, oilseeds and pulses Other topics identified by the applicant if substantiated to GRDC. It is expected that the applicant will facilitate the delivery of the workshops to industry segments and will be responsible for arranging all administrative and logistical requirements of the workshops. Workshop delivery will include an emphasis on the delivery of information to and from growers, consultants, agribusiness and other industry customers. The applicant is expected to demonstrate the methodology of intended workshops is appropriate to ensure that uptake and adoption is maximised. To complement existing events it is proposed that this investment will improve access and discussion of highly technical information, which will be subsequently disseminated widely across the grains industry by both the applicant and the GRDC. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $90,000 for up to three individual workshop series within the GRDC’s Southern Region, up to $30,000 per workshop series. 39 Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 7.2.4.02C Criteria 1 7.2.4.02C Criteria 2 7.2.4.02C Criteria 3 7.2.4.02C Criteria 4 An understanding of the nature and importance of the tender to the Southern grains industry 1.1 Demonstrated understanding and ability to address the issue(s) proposed for the workshop(s) 1.2 Clear linkages with proposed target audiences (e.g. agribusiness, consultants, other industry institutions/representatives) – including proposed target audience, numbers of participants, entry costs (if applicable) and methods for delivery 1.3 Demonstrated understanding of the need for these workshops Demonstrated ability to attract relevant presenters from GRDC-funded research projects or the broader agricultural and business sectors to reflect the topic(s) proposed including opportunities to make presenters from workshops available for other GRDC based events. Mandatory Soundness of the proposed workshop delivery methods and project management arrangements, including 3.1 Outline the frequency, location and repetition of workshop(s) for the Southern Region 3.2 Projected participant numbers per workshop 3.3 Demonstrated ability to schedule face to face technical workshops in a planned way to meet timing and geographical location requirements to maximise participation by proposed target audiences 3.4 Demonstrated access and ability to collaborate with grain grower, adviser, research providers, agribusiness and other agricultural industry networks. 3.5 Demonstrated ability to coordinate all administrative tasks involved including venues, catering, travel and accommodation arrangements for participants 3.6 Demonstrated ability to integrate into workshop programs technical aspects with environmental sustainability, farm profitability and implications for business management (e.g. financial considerations) 3.7 Demonstrated ability to widely promote the workshop including via GRDC diary dates (www.grdc.com.au/diarydates) and communication mechanisms 3.8 Demonstrated ability to maintain/facilitate follow up action/support with participants after the workshop Development of pre and post key performance adoption indicators/targets and methods for measurement and evaluation on a per workshop basis including the development and provision of a report at the conclusion of the workshop for publication on the GRDC website and for use in other GRDC extension mechanisms and provision of workshop participant contact details to the GRDC in electronic format. Mandatory 7.2.4.02C Criteria 6 Demonstrated ability to use workshop materials as training tools. The cost effectiveness of the tender response including cash and a detailed overview of in-kind commitments from the applicants. Costs should be itemised per workshop. This includes the ability to actively seek and leverage sponsorship opportunities. Contact details of at least three referees who are familiar with the tenderer’s previous work in providing similar services. 7.2.4.02C Criteria 7 Identify innovative and other value added options that are cost effective and deliver value for money 7.2.4.02C Criteria 5 Procurement Method: Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Maureen Cribb Manager Publications, Grower Services m.cribb@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 40 7.2.4.03C Grains Research Updates – Northern and Southern Issue: To provide face to face adviser, grower, irrigation and high rainfall updates in the GRDC Northern and/or Southern Regions to outline and gather feedback on RDE issues of greatest significance to growers and advisers. Aim: There are several important key aims for future GRDC update series: To continue to provide cutting edge R, D and E information through face to face interaction between the GRDC, growers and advisers. To increase update attendances in the Northern and Southern Regions To provide appropriate networking between GRDC, its investment partners and participants to improve information flows. To provide a dynamic and engaging learning environment for participants to maximise adoption of new technologies and practices. An ability to highlight GRDC’s responsiveness to emerging industry issues and trends. To deliver a higher quality, lower cost project to the GRDC. To deliver updates in high rainfall and irrigated zones where appropriate. Improving interactivity in the updates Greater use of a wide range of keynote speakers that provide timely, relevant and quality information Target programs for differing skillsets, including experienced and less experienced advisers Continued importance of “on ground” take home messages Potential expansion of the number updates in GRDC regions Provision of regular recommendations on an ongoing basis to the GRDC on suggested improvements in the program Project Description: GRDC is seeking a suitable Update contractor/s with the ability to deliver face to face GRDC Research Update series in either one or both of the GRDC’s Northern and Southern grain growing regions for a three (3) year period. The GRDC Research Update services will involve: The delivery of a program to growers and advisers through face to face adviser and grower updates (showcasing GRDC and partner R, D & E outputs). The Updates will be conducted within each of the GRDC’s Northern and Southern Regions (including summer cropping updates in the Northern Region, high rainfall and irrigation zones in the Southern Region) The production of GRDC research update newsletters, email newsletters and other innovative delivery mechanisms within the GRDC’s Northern Region. It is expected that Update coordinators will be provide the GRDC a participant list in electronic Excel format of update participants for integration into the GRDC customer relationship database, in accordance with GRDC’s obligations under the Privacy Act. Regular liaision regularly with GRDC Executive Managers and Program Managers, GRDC Panel Members and GRDC investment partners to identify and coordinate Update issues and latest research, development and extension topics. It will be expected that the providers will demonstrate evidence of quality in delivering the following each of the following services: Sourcing, researching and planning the Research Update Program for growers in the respective regions (incorporating a itemised breakdown of costs). Sourcing, researching and planning the Research Update Program for advisers in the respective regions (incorporating a itemised breakdown of costs) Distribution of Update promotional material by fax, mail and/or email on a per item basis. Production of Update proceedings. Production of Update newsletters. Expenses associated with the usage of interstate and international speakers (including airfares, accommodation and incidental expenses) used in the Research Update program over the duration of the contract. Costs for all keynote speakers, including international speakers 41 The next contract will need to employ innovative technologies such as social media and also consider succession planning of the provider to ensure that adequate backup plans are in place to deliver update programs. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $300,000 per annum in the Northern Region for three years and $600,000 per annum in the Southern Region for three years in this project. Applicants can tender for one or both regions. Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 7.2.4.03C Criteria 1 7.2.4.03C Criteria 2 7.2.4.03C Criteria 3 7.2.4.03C Criteria 4 7.2.4.03C Criteria 5 7.2.4.03C Criteria 6 7.2.4.03C Criteria 7 Proposed methods in which the services provided will enhance the adoption of new practices and technologies and measures to track progress throughout the life of the program. Demonstrated ability to ensure all content delivered at Updates will provide economic and farm business management considerations. Acknowledgement that the GRDC requires the production of a detailed GRDC Research Update Business Plan which generates and coordinates GRDC Research Update activities guided by the GRDC’s Manager Extension and Grower Programs and the relevant regional panel chairman (on behalf of the regional panel), following potential shortlisting of this procurement process. Acknowledgment that the GRDC will expect status against this plan to be reported upon quarterly. Evidence of this Business Plan will not only consider in detail the criteria listed in this plan, but also provide detailed information on risk management processes associated with the Update services. A demonstrated understanding of customer segment needs, including a well-defined awareness and distinction between target audiences and processes to address specific needs. This includes scheduling of face to face Updates in a planned way to meet timing and geographical location requirements to maximise participation and satisfaction by growers, advisers and agribusiness: Access to grain grower, adviser, research providers and agricultural industry networks Ability to work closely with the Regional Cropping Facilitator groups in the Northern and Southern Regions and to determine agendas that are regionally specific A demonstrated understanding in the differentiation between adviser and grower updates both in terms of content and technical data Evidence that agendas/topics will be agreed upon with the regional panels and the GRDC prior to promotion Proposed locations and timings of updates and justifications explaining how these updates will maximise impact to growers and advisers. A demonstrated understanding of how the Update provider will differentiate materials for both experienced/inexperienced advisers and growers Demonstrated evidence to ensure senior agribusiness/advisers/consultants continue to/will attend Updates. Track record and demonstrated agricultural sector knowledge and experience of the key personnel who will deliver the Update services. Ability to work collaboratively and share information with other Update Coordinators and GRDC’s national and other regional communication providers, attract relevant speakers from GRDC-funded research projects or the broader agricultural or business sectors to reflect the topics proposed, including opportunities to include and share international speakers. Ability to develop innovative approaches for the delivery of Research Updates and relevant information, including the use of novel technologies. 42 Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 7.2.4.03C Criteria 8 7.2.4.03C Criteria 9 7.2.4.03C Criteria 10 7.2.4.03C Criteria 11 7.2.4.03C Criteria 12 7.2.4.03C Criteria 13 7.2.4.03C Criteria 14 7.2.4.03C Criteria 15 7.2.4.03C Criteria 16 7.2.4.03C Criteria 17 7.2.4.03C Criteria 18 7.2.4.03C Criteria 19 The cost effectiveness and value for money of the response and a detailed provision of cost structures for participants of the updates and the methodologies used to determine this, both at grower and adviser level. Demonstrated innovative cost structures to encourage participation by growers and advisers. Demonstrated methodologies the tenderer will use for proposed project evaluation of the Update services, including impact analysis and changes to attitudes on specific topics of interest to the GRDC, both pre, during and post update events. Extent to which the tenderer proposes to manage the delivery of Update services and ensure continuity of the team delivering Update services. Contact details of at least three referees who are familiar with the tenderer’s previous work in providing Update or similar services. Term of engagement and performance of the Services in accordance with the Service Contract. Full details of any subcontractors that may be used to conduct Update services. Conflict of interest identification and management. Mandatory Understanding that all Update participants will be provided quarterly to the GRDC in electronic Excel format for integration into the GRDC customer relationship database, in accordance with GRDC’s obligations under the Privacy Act. Ability to liaise regularly with GRDC Executive Managers and Program Managers, GRDC Panel Members and GRDC investment partners to identify and coordinate Update issues and latest research, development and extension topics. When costing services the Applicant must include in its response a total estimated price including (but separately identified) GST to perform the services together with separate fees including (but separately identified) GST for each of the following services: Sourcing, researching and planning the Research Update Program for growers in the respective regions (incorporating an itemised breakdown of costs) Sourcing, researching and planning the Research Update Program for advisers in the respective regions (incorporating an itemised breakdown of costs) Distribution of Update promotional material by fax, mail and/or email on a per item basis Production of Update proceedings, on a per item basis Production of Update newsletters, on a per item basis Expenses associated with the usage of interstate and international speakers (including airfares, accommodation and incidental expenses) used in the Research Update program over the duration of the contract Venue and infrastructure. Fees are to include all costs for all keynote speakers, including international speakers. Acknowledgment that the GRDC will undertake a Services Agreement during the negotiation phase. Innovative and other value added options that are cost effective and deliver value for money. Mandatory Procurement Method: Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Maureen Cribb Manager Publications, Grower Services m.cribb@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 43 7.2.4.04C Improving Practice Of Spray Drift Management Techniques Issue: Management of spray drift presents an on going problem for the grains industry. The movement of farm chemicals away from the site of application can impact on other crops (through damage or residue violations), it can impact on native vegetation, animals and biodiversity, and it can impact human health. Each impact representing potential economic, environmental or trade related risk to the grains industry. At the same time growers are constantly wanting to maximise the efficacy of application to ensure that pests, weeds and diseases are managed effectively. Aim: The approach for this project is to implement an integrated extension strategy focusing on all points where growers and applicators seek information, training, equipment and products for pesticide application in the GRDC Northern, Southern and Western Regions. The program will have several key aims: Conduct timely and regionally specific face to face demonstration of the technical and financial impacts of good versus poor chemical applications with at least 3500 growers attending the training over the three year period At least 350 advisers/consultants attended over the three year period At least 80 machinery dealerships participated in the training over the three year period Regular upgrades to materials as information from GRDC, researchers and regulators becomes available Develop and implement a network of trainers skilled in spray application to deliver regular pesticide application workshops Review and integrate website resources into the newly created www.grdc.com.au/spraylinks website promote weather websites that are most useful for spray application Develop and update, in conjunction with the GRDC a series of fact sheets on topical issues relating to spray application To improve understanding of meteorological conditions as part of the spray drift training packages To incorporate spray drift training into accredited packages To work closely with growers farming systems groups, agribusiness and consultants in the Northern, Southern and Western Regions To continue replicated trials to assist the development of materials for the workshops To incorporate regional variation into workshop materials Evaluation and exit surveys to understand change in practices and intent of participants Produce and distribute regular publications, products and services for the GRDC following the workshops. Collaborate with GRDC to ensure that key messages relating to new developments in pesticide application are distributed via GRDC delivery networks, particularly the GRDC CRM to target growers that may not attend workshops Ensure that industry changes (including outcomes from the National Working Party for Pesticide Application are incorporated into training programs with pesticide application) Project Description: Much of the risk associated with spray drift is able to be managed through a greater understanding of the factors that contribute to drift, such as; nozzle selection, machinery setup, manner of operation and meteorological conditions. Access to this understanding can be provided to grain growers through high quality training, supported by practical field research. However, this knowledge must also be supported by a network of suitably skilled advisers, resellers and dealers that all support the same message. Supporting delivery through new resources will inform new participants. The GRDC wishes to engage a suitably qualified and experienced person(s) or company to work with the GRDC to conduct spray drift training in one or more the GRDC Northern, Southern and Western Regions. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $450,000 per year ($150,000 per region) for three years on this project. 44 Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 7.2.4.04C Criteria 1 7.2.4.04C Criteria 2 7.2.4.04C Criteria 3 7.2.4.04C Criteria 4 7.2.4.04C Criteria 5 7.2.4.04C Criteria 6 7.2.4.04C Criteria 7 7.2.4.04C Criteria 8 7.2.4.04C Criteria 9 7.2.4.04C Criteria 10 7.2.4.04C Criteria 11 An understanding of the nature and importance of the tender to the Australian grains industry. Soundness of the proposed delivery methods and project management arrangements, including Ability to schedule face to face spray drift workshops in a planned way to meet timing and geographical location requirements to maximise participation by extension professionals, researchers, advisers, agribusiness, resellers, machinery manufacturers and other relevant industry customers Proposed methods and soundness of project evaluation arrangements, including impact analysis Ability to coordinate all administrative tasks involved including venues, catering and registration arrangements Ability to integrate technical aspects with implications for farm profitability and implications for business management (e.g. financial considerations) into spray drift programs Evidence of a sound approach to, and ability in, communicating and promoting the workshop widely to the grains industry Demonstrated ability to maintain/facilitate follow up action/support with participants after the workshop. Access to grain grower, adviser, research providers, agribusiness, regulatory authorities, training institutions, state affiliates and other agricultural industry networks. Demonstrated ability to incorporate all materials generated under this investment into accredited spray drift training programs and other adult learning/registered courses and to adapt to new R and D outcomes into training materials Demonstrated technical knowledge and experience of the key personnel to address proposed spray drift management awareness process and to measure practice change pre, during and post workshop. Demonstrated communication skills of nominated personnel. Develop and provide a timely plain English report on a quarterly basis for publication on the GRDC website and for use in other GRDC extension mechanisms. The cost effectiveness of the tender response including cash and in-kind commitments from the applicants. Understanding that all spray drift participants will be provided quarterly to the GRDC in electronic Excel format for integration into the GRDC customer relationship database, in accordance with GRDC’s obligations under the Privacy Act. Demonstrated plans to use train the trainer processes that will ensure ongoing succession planning for the delivery of on farm grain storage extension. Demonstrated ability to work closely with the GRDC to ensure all materials are posted on the GRDC website Mandatory Innovative and other value added options that are cost effective and deliver value for money. Mandatory Procurement Method: Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Maureen Cribb Manager Publications, Grower Services m.cribb@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 45 7.2.4.05B Improving Grain Storage Extension Issue: To develop and implement extension packages for a range of issues relating to the economics and on farm management of grain storage to growers, advisers and manufacturers in the Northern, Southern and Western grains regions. The objective of this project is to ensure growers have the confidence to implement practical grain storage options on farm. This project will provide improved understanding and awareness on issues to do with on farm storage of grain, with at least 360 advisers (120 per region) participating in workshops and 6,000 growers (2,000 per region) implementing grain storage options over the three year period, as a result of extension activities (to be measured by the successful provider). The objective can be broken down into these main segments: Collate industry information into one place. Conduct demonstrations and workshops in each GRDC region to provide on farm training and provide follow-up support to ensure that growers are confident in making decisions whether to adopt and how to manage on-farm storage To make sure growers are equipped with skills and knowledge so growers can make decisions about grain storage management appropriate to their situation. To ensure ongoing capacity exists for the training of grain storage extension. Aim: The project will provide information resources and pre and post follow-up services for grain growers and associated service industries in the field of grain storage. Enabling informed decisions based on research outcomes in areas such as pest control, grain quality management and storage equipment investment options. It is also envisaged that further investment will also add a focus towards greater integration with silo manufacturers, farming systems groups and agribusiness. This project aslo has a major role in ensuring the CRC for National Plant Biosecurity research and development outcomes are integrated into training and extended back to growers and their influencers. Project Description: This investment aims to build on existing work through the maintenance and ongoing enhancement of industry based resources and expand the suite of follow-up services on the topic of grains storage. Delivery of on farm grain storage options requires extension services nationally to ensure growers make fully informed decisions for maximum value for their harvest. Specific issues to be addressed include: • • • • • Preparation and management techniques to maximise profit: Full management packages to develop guidelines – including the key questions growers should ask in determining and implementing storage options Economics of grain storage and market conditions, including the delivery of farm storage management options and levels of risk Tactics for minimising insect resistance to grain storage chemicals Grain hygiene principles for on farm storage Chemical application and MRL incidences Ongoing information to meet legislative, safety and end-user requirements The GRDC wishes to engage a suitably qualified and experienced person(s) or company to work with the GRDC to develop on farm storage materials, economic packages and ongoing grower and adviser based support to improve quality of uptake of adoption of on farm grain storage by growers. It is expected that the successful applicant(s) will need to work closely with agribusiness, grower groups, grain handlers and other industry organisations to widely disseminate information generated and feedback received. Applicants may choose to respond in one or more of the three GRDC regions over a three-year period. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $600,000 per annum for up to three years for this project. ($200,000 per annum in the Northern Region, Southern Region and Western Region). 46 Specific Selection Criteria Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 7.2.4.05C Criteria 1 7.2.4.05C Criteria 2 7.2.4.05C Criteria 3 7.2.4.05C Criteria 4 7.2.4.05C Criteria 5 7.2.4.05C Criteria 6 7.2.4.05C Criteria 7 7.2.4.05C Criteria 8 7.2.4.05C Criteria 9 7.2.4.05C Criteria 10 7.2.4.05C Criteria 11 7.2.4.05C Criteria 12 7.2.4.05C Criteria 13 7.2.4.05C Criteria 14 7.2.4.05C Criteria 15 7.2.4.05C Criteria 16 An understanding of the nature and importance of the tender to the Australian grains industry. Demonstrated ability to run face to face demonstrations and collate existing resources generated in on-farm storage in each of the GRDC regions, according to regional requirements but maintain a degree of consistency in approach national. The GRDC requires the number of workshops proposed during the three year period to be listed and likely target audiences and projected numbers. Demonstrated ability to ensure all extension materials will incorporate economic and risk management considerations of on farm grain storage, including proposed measures and methods for comparison against “best practice” and quality assured principles. This includes the ability to deliver economic analysis and engage with appropriate expertise. Demonstrated ability to ensure agribusiness, grower groups, suppliers, resellers, grain handlers and other industry organisations adopt on farm grain storage extension products and services from this work. Demonstrated ability to create or further develop a range of supporting materials, such as toolkits, factsheets, newsletters and other information resources covering on farm storage. Demonstrated ability to provide follow-up support for growers and their influencers outside workshops, including proposed techniques to demonstrate practice change. Proposed monitoring and evaluation techniques to determine impact of all materials generated within the on farm grain storage extension project. Ability to work closely with the GRDC to provide targeted and timely dissemination of outcomes. Ability to use grower case studies and ability to work with media and other industry dissemination vehicles. Demonstrated project management skills including a detailed implementation plan for face to face contact with growers and advisers to disseminate key messages for on-farm grain storage. Demonstrated ability to promote grain storage activities and opportunities to leverage from other grains industry activities to maximise participation. Demonstrated ability to work and deliver all information generated to the GRDC for insertion on the GRDC website and GRDC customer relationship management system, including details of all participants. Demonstrated technical knowledge and experience of the key personnel, including sub-contractors if applicable. Demonstrated plans to use train the trainer processes that will ensure ongoing succession planning for the delivery of on farm grain storage extension. The cost effectiveness and value for money of the tender response, including cash and/or in-kind commitments from the applicants and leverage opportunities. Innovative and other value added options for the extension and economics of on farm grain storage. Procurement Method: Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Maureen Cribb Manager Publications, Grower Services m.cribb@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 47 7.2.4.06C National And Regional Agribusiness Reference Groups Issue: Growers continue to use agribusiness and consultants to validate on farm decisions. This project demonstrates the importance of GRDC engaging with agribusiness, in all its forms, to create an additional conduit for the results of grains industry funded R, D and E to be delivered to grain growers. Agribusiness has an equivalent desire to engage with GRDC. Aim: The objective of these projects is to; Strengthen GRDC’s relationship with agribusiness Improve information collection Disseminate research findings Provide an avenue for agribusiness to participate in the investment process. To collate grower Research, Development and Extension issues in a timely manner and to provide feedback via a large pool of consultants nationally and within the regions To ensure that consultants are made aware of the issues facing the grains industry in a timely manner from an R,D, E context To assist in understanding the influence of pratices adopted by growers at a regional level To involve agribusiness in strategic and tactical operations of the GRDC and other issues of significance to the Australian grains industry To involve agribusiness in testing new GRDC extension based platforms To ensure regional agribusiness can engage with the GRDC Panel system and GRDC based investments in a formal manner Project Description: This project focuses on facilitating the engagement of agribusiness with GRDC at a strategic and operational level with agribusiness representatives through ongoing maintenance of a National Agribusiness Reference Group (NARG) and Regional Agribusiness Reference Groups (RARG) that will function in the GRDC Northern, Southern and Western Regions to: Ensure identification of key issues for attention of GRDC in terms of delivery of RD&E outputs via agribusiness advisers to grain grower levy payers Consider grains policy and relevant future industry issues that might affect grains RD&E priorities and industry profitability Develop collaborative working relationships at a national and regional level including specific and relevant regional projects on as required basis Link where appropriate to GRDC delivery activities to double as a feedback mechanism and seek out wider data that will inform a more focussed and structured engagement strategy Determine key issues for potential joint project work Report quarterly on progress agribusiness engagement that arise from the market research Engage GRDC in NARG and RARG activities The Services are to continue to manage on behalf of the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) the facilitation of the GRDC-Agribusiness Engagement Strategy with clearly defined facilitation to enable ongoing management of the relationship with agribusiness by the GRDC at the conclusion of this project. Key facilitation will include: NARG At least two face to face meetings per year with agendas agreed in conjunction with the GRDC Other interaction: o Informal between meeting contact o Email network o Provide quarterly feedback on key issues Act as a network for communicating issues and feeding into GRDC investments and extension Pre, during and post evaluation of all meetings and teleconferences 48 RARG At least one face to face meeting per year – two groups in each GRDC region with agendas agreed in conjunction with the GRDC Other interaction: o Informal between meeting contact o Email network o Provide quarterly feedback on key issues Act as a network for communicating issues and feeding into GRDC investments and extension Pre, during and post evaluation of all meetings and teleconferences Outcomes from facilitating stronger relationships and participation with agribusiness include: Increasing efficiency and consistency in grains research and advisory work through: o Two way communication o Networks and package to aid R&D adoption o Regular input to research, development and extension priorities Agribusinesses acting as a partner with GRDC to achieve environmental and production practice change in their networks of growers; o Increase research adoption of agreed issues per annum between the GRDC and agribusiness Measure the ability to obtain many different perspectives of the grains industry from a wide range of varied agribusinesses enabling a strong strategic focus for the industry; Improving the quality and uptake of information and knowledge generated by focusing on communication, extension and delivery issues; Agribusiness participating with grain producers to identify RD&E priorities for the future; Establishing arrangements for participation of both GRDC and agribusiness in strategic planning activities. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $120,000 per year for three years in this project to cover both the National and Regional Agribusiness Reference Groups. Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 7.2.4.06C Criteria 1 7.2.4.06C Criteria 2 7.2.4.06C Criteria 3 7.2.4.06C Criteria 4 7.2.4.06C Criteria 5 7.2.4.06C Criteria 6 7.2.4.06C Criteria 7 7.2.4.06C Criteria 8 7.2.4.06C Criteria 9 7.2.4.06C Criteria 10 7.2.4.06C Criteria 11 An understanding of the scale and potential relevance of this project to the Australian grains industry. Ability to provide assistance and support in developing responses to meeting issues including analysis of agribusiness needs and challenges and the design of creative solutions. Ability to provide high quality communication (written and verbal) with stakeholders on strategic and operational issues – including ability to shape strategic thinking and achieving results. The cost effectiveness of the tender response including cash and in-kind commitments from the applicant. Demonstrated project management skills, including development of a proposed implementation plan and associated support materials. Soundness of the proposed methodology, including project management and project evaluation arrangements on a quarterly basis to the GRDC. Ability to liaise and work collaboratively with the GRDC’s Regional Panels and other GRDC project staff as required. Demonstrated ability to meet short deadlines and proven communication and facilitation skills. Demonstrated technical knowledge, communication skills, organisational skills and experience of the key personnel when partnering with agribusiness. Ability to work closely with the Regional Cropping Solutions groups Mandatory Innovative and other value added options that are cost effective and deliver value for money. Mandatory 49 Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Procurement Method: Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Maureen Cribb Manager Publications, Grower Services m.cribb@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 50 7.4.3.01C Converting information from research reports for a grower audience Issue: Projects often generate research reports for a number of reasons, be it compliance, scientific discovery or to validate complex hypotheses. Often these reports are written in such a way that interpretation is difficult for industry, particularly growers to understand. With this in mind, it is important that the GRDC translates this information into a format that can be widely understood by growers and the people that influence them. Aim: To publish electronically and hard copy: a series of A4 booklets written in plain English which contain relevant and timely information in an easy to use format topics of high relevance to the grains industry across the Northern, Southern and Western Regions to deliver publications in a manner that is timely to industry needs and key decision cycles for growers Project Description: This project consists of the following: The re-writing (or sub-editing in some cases) of GRDC finalised research reports which have been identified for wider distribution to the grains industry. Some reports will require extensive re-writing into plain English (particularly where the content is at a high technical level) and in other instances excellent sub-editing skills will be required. Provision of graphic design, production and print services (where applicable) to the GRDC of nominated A4 research reports. All reports must conform to the GRDC’s research reports template and the design is to be inclusive of the redrawing of any information graphics, layout, proof-reading, author’s corrections, image sourcing and preparation etc. Each research report is to be provided to the GRDC in XML, tagged PDF and in HTML formats. Where a report has been identified by the GRDC for print, numbers will be determined by the GRDC and delivery will be to the GRDC’s distribution outlet in Canberra. The final draft of all reports are to be submitted to the GRDC for approval and all finalised reports are to submitted to the GRDC as PDF print-ready files. Provision of a draft media release, webpage or email/SMS text promoting the content of each of the research reports. A minimum of 20 research reports are to be delivered in this project. Proposed Investment: The GRDC expects to invest up to $150,000 per year for 3 years in this project. Specific Selection Criteria: Evaluation of the tender will take into account the Specific Selection Criteria tabulated below: 7.4.3.01C Criteria 1 7.4.3.01C Criteria 2 7.4.3.01C Criteria 3 7.4.3.01C Criteria 4 7.4.3.01C Criteria 5 Demonstrated technical knowledge of the grains industry Mandatory Proven ability of sound writing and editing skills, with a focus on grower friendly written products Demonstrated graphic design and production and printing skills Mandatory Excellent relevant track record of the project supervisor and of all key personnel involved in the project The cost effectiveness and value for money of the tender response, including cash and/or in-kind commitments from the applicants is essential to progress this report. Mandatory 51 Mandatory Mandatory Procurement Method: Multi-stage Tender (refer page 9) Closing Date: 20 October 2011 at 2pm AEST Contact Details: Maureen Cribb Manager Publications, Grower Services m.cribb@grdc.com.au Ph 02 6166 4500 52