MIT Academy Data Analysis
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx

Meets or Exceeds State and Local Reference Points
Growth from Prior Year AND Progressive Improvement over 2 or More Years
Growth from Prior Year OR Progressive Improvement over 2 or More Years
Limited or No Growth from Prior Year NOR Progressive Improvement over 2 or More Years
Metric Does Not Apply
MIT Academy Indicators
2011-12
LEA/
Subschool
group1
Basic (Priority 1)
Teacher
misassignment
Access to instructional
materials
Adequate facilities
N/A
100%
N/A
100%
N/A
No
improvements
100%
N/A
Added Z
classroom
N/A
N/A
100%
N/A
100%
N/A
100%
N/A
Implementation of
state standards
Pupil
achievement
(Priority 4)
Tests/API
Standardized test
Life Sci
performance--historical3 31% A/P
(VCUSD)
(42%)
2013-14
LEA/
Subschool
group1
Goal 1: Conditions of Learning
0
N/A
0
0
Impl. of state
standards
(Priority 2)
Course access
(Priority 7)
Course access in 9
curricular areas
2012-13
LEA/
Subschool
group1
2014-15 (est.)
LEA/
Subschool
group1
Local ref.
N/A
0
N/A
0
N/A
100%
N/A
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Resurface
MPR
floor
100%
Improvement 5%
each year
100%
100%
N/A
100%
N/A
100%
access in
8 areas
Life Sci
74% A/P
(32%)
N/A
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
N/A
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
N/A
>VCUSD
100%
Added 4
classrooms,
2 BA
100%
N/A
Goal 2: Pupil Outcomes
N/A
Life Sci
53% A/P
(37%)
N/A
CAASPP (start 2015)—
Math (VCUSD)
CAASPP (start 2015)—
ELA (VCUSD)
API or equivalent3
N/A
N/A
>VCUSD
>VCUSD
>VCUSD
State ref.
 CAHSEE pass rate
(%) gr 10 (VCUSD)
AP pass rate
EAP3
(VCUSD)
M84/E82
(72/74)
None
M91/E91
(78/72)
A-Amer
M13/E12
M92/E90
(76/72)
ELRREP
M16/E14
N/A
N/A
19%
N/A
63%
N/A
M41/E19
(62/23)
SED E13,
Hisp E11
M37/E40
(64/25)
SED
M51/E50
M14/E13, (36/28)
ELR-FEP
M20/E19,
Hisp E17
A-Amer
E 18
Sub-group
achievement
College/career
readiness
Complete a-g with
grades of >C
M90/E88
(Data not
yet
available)
TBD
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
N/A
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
TBD
(Data not
yet
available)
>VCUSD
N/A
100% of
grads
TBD
85% of
grads
10% start
17-18
100% of
grads
100% of
grads
100% of
grads
50% of
grads
start 1516
80% of
grads
start 1516
20%
grads
15% of
grads 1617
55%
N/A
66%
N/A
100%
N/A
 Acceptance at 4-yr
college/university
 Complete >1
industry certification
 Complete >9 college
units
 Complete 35 hour
internship
 Complete 140 hours
community service
 Complete entrylevel college math
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
84%
N/A
Data not
yet
available
85%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 Complete entrylevel college English
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
7
N/A
20
N/A
17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
 Earn CDE Seal of
Biliteracy3
Complete CTE
pathway
EL progress
>VCUSD
Improve
>5%/yr
>VCUSD
Other pupil
outcomes
(Priority 8)
 EL advancement
rate
 EL reclassification
rate to R-FEP
Included in Priority 4,
pupil achievement
2/16 =
13%
65%
(state 16)
N/A
N/A
5/13 =
38%
6.2%
(state 12)
N/A
N/A
3/8 =
38%
43.8%
(state 12)
N/A
TBD
N/A
50%
75%
TBD
N/A
40%
Goal 3: Engagement
Parental
involvement
(Priority 3)
Pupil
engagement
(Priority 5)
Parental input/
involvement efforts
 Parent satisfaction
 Parent hours
completion
Various indicators
Attendance
Chronic absenteeism
(# of students)
High school dropout1
High school
graduation (cohort)1
School climate
(Priority 6)
Various indicators
Suspension rate
 Honor Roll (1st
semester)
 “F” rate (1st semester)
92%
54%
N/A
N/A
83%
80%
N/A
N/A
90%
84%
N/A
N/A
91%
90%
N/A
N/A
90%
90%
95%
N/A
96%
N/A
97%
N/A
97%
N/A
30
N/A
26
N/A
24
N/A
18
N/A
3.1%
N/A2
2.4%
(state 3.1)
N/A
Data not
yet
available
Data not
yet
available
Data not
yet
available
Data not
yet
available
95%
Improve
>5%/yr
>VCUSD
2.9%
58.5
White
28.52
64.6
A-Amer
502
80%
(TBD)
A-Amer
66%2
>VCUSD
47%
N/A
84%
N/A
211%
N/A
26%
N/A
<2014-15
49%
N/A
35%
N/A
40%
N/A
51%
N/A
N/A
N/A
51%
N/A
45%
N/A
42%
N/A
Increase
>2%
Decrease
>2%
 = locally added indicator; N/A = Not applicable or not available
1) Sub-groups listed scored >10 percentage points lower than “all students;” # of points lower is shown
2) n is too small for meaningful analysis
3) Historical rate comparison will not be valid, given the change in the test and/or other criteria beginning in 2014-15
Outcomes Analysis Summary: WILL COMPLETE AFTER FULL DATA IS AVAILABLE
Element
Pupil Outcomes
Conditions for Learning
Engagement
At/Above State or Local Reference Point
LEA/school
Student sub-group
Below State or Local Reference Point
LEA/school
Student sub-group
Reflect and Assess
Review the LEA/school outcome data and consider the following:
What are the areas where the LEA/school has demonstrated progress
What are areas where the LEA/school needs to improve?
Review the student subgroup outcome data and consider the following:
What are the areas where the student subgroup has demonstrated progress
What are areas where the student subgroup needs to improve?