Science Rubric

advertisement
SCORE
6
An essay in this
category
demonstrates
clear and
consistent
mastery,
although it may
have a few
minor errors.






5
An essay in this
category
demonstrates
reasonably
consistent
mastery,
although it will
have occasional
errors or lapses
in quality.




CRITERIA
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization,
and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
o Sequencing is logical and effective.
o Contains an inviting introduction; a satisfying conclusion.
o Flows smoothly with transitions.
Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone.
o Paragraphing tends to be sound.
o Grammar and usage are correct.
o Punctuation is accurate.
o Spelling is generally correct.
Support claims with logical reasoning and relevant, accurate data and
evidence that demonstrate an understanding of the topic or text, using
credible sources.
o Explanation of topic with relevant, well-chosen facts, data, or
details from activity.
o Uses enough evidence to fully support the response.
Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or
explain the topic.
o Words are specific and accurate.
o The use of scientific terminology enhances the response.
Provide a concluding statement or section that supports the information.
o Restate the purpose or main idea.
o Summarize important findings.
o Supports the information or explanation presented.
The response reflects a complete synthesis of information.
o Topic developed in a purposeful, thorough way.
o All parts of prompt are completely addressed.
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization,
and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
o Sequencing is logical and effective.
o Contains an inviting introduction; a satisfying conclusion.
o Flows smoothly with transitions.
Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone.
o Paragraphing tends to be sound.
o Grammar and usage are generally correct.
o Punctuation is generally accurate.
o Spelling is generally correct.
Support claims with logical reasoning and relevant, accurate data and
evidence that demonstrate an understanding of the topic or text, using
credible sources.
o Explanation of topic with relevant, well-chosen facts, data, or
details from activity.
o Uses enough evidence to support the response.
Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or
explain the topic.


4

An essay in this
category
demonstrates
adequate
mastery,
although it will
have lapses in
quality.





3
An essay in this
category
demonstrates
developing
mastery; it will
have lapses in
quality and is
marked by
weaknesses in
one or more
categories.




o Words are specific and accurate.
o The use of scientific terminology enhances the response.
Provide a concluding statement or section that supports the information.
o Restate the purpose or main idea.
o Summarize important findings.
The response reflects a complete synthesis of information.
o Topic developed in a purposeful, thorough way.
o All parts of prompt are completely addressed.
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization,
and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
o Sequencing is evident.
o Contains an introduction and a conclusion.
o Generally flows smoothly with transitions.
Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone.
o Paragraphing tends to be sound.
o Grammar and usage are generally correct.
o Punctuation is generally accurate.
o Spelling is generally correct.
Support claims with relevant, accurate data and evidence that demonstrate
an understanding of the topic or text, using credible sources.
o Explanation of topic with relevant facts, data, or details from
activity.
o Uses evidence to support the response.
Use language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the
topic.
o Words are accurate.
o The use of scientific terminology enhances the response.
Provide a concluding statement or section that supports the information.
o Restate the purpose or main idea.
o Summarize important findings.
The response reflects a complete synthesis of information.
o All parts of prompt are completely addressed.
Produce writing in which the development, organization, and style are
generally appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
o Limited in its organization and/or focus, or demonstrates problems
with coherence or progression of ideas.
Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone.
o Grammar and usage are somewhat correct.
o Punctuation is somewhat accurate.
o Spelling is somewhat correct.
Support claims with data and evidence that may demonstrate an
understanding of the topic or text, using credible sources.
o Uses evidence to support the response that is somewhat limited.
Use language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the
topic.


2
An essay in this
category
demonstrates
little mastery; it
will have lapses
in quality and is
marked by
weaknesses in
one or more
categories.






1
An essay in this
category
demonstrates
very little or no
mastery.
0






o Words are somewhat accurate.
Provide a concluding statement or section that supports the information.
o May restate the purpose or main idea.
o May summarize important findings.
The response reflects a synthesis of information.
o All parts of prompt may be addressed.
Produce writing in which the development, organization, and style are
generally appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
o Poorly organized and/or focused, or demonstrates serious problems
with coherence or progression of ideas.
Style and tone may be appropriate.
o Frequent problems in sentence structure, grammar and spelling.
Develops a point of view on the issue that is vague or seriously limited, and
demonstrates weak critical thinking, providing inappropriate or insufficient
examples, data, reasons, or other evidence to support its position.
Displays very little facility in the use of language, using very limited
vocabulary or incorrect word choice.
May provide a concluding statement or section that supports the
information.
Parts of prompt are addressed.
Disorganized and/or unfocused, or demonstrates serious problems with
coherence or progression of ideas.
Severe problems in sentence structure, grammar and spelling.
Develops no viable point of view on the issue, or provides little or no
evidence to supports its position.
Displays fundamental errors in vocabulary.
Conclusion is not present.
Parts of prompt may be addressed.
The response is completely incorrect or irrelevant or there is no response.
http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/psat/psatextra/scoring_guide_popup.html
http://mdk12.org/assessments/high_school/look_like/biology/rubric.html
http://mdk12.org/share/frameworks/CCSC_Science_gr6-8w.pdf
https://readingweb.madison.k12.wi.us/files/reading/six_traits_scoring_guide--OVH.pdf
Download