jbi12697-sup-0001-AppendixS1-S2

advertisement
Journal of Biogeography
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Comparison of phylogeographical structures of a lichen-forming fungus and its
green algal photobiont in western North America
Jin-Ming Chen, Silke Werth and Victoria L. Sork
Appendix S1 Supplementary tables.
Table S1 Localities, habitats, ecoregions and sample size (N) of each of the 73
localities of studied lichen R. menziesii.
Localities
Location
Longitude
Latitude
Habitat
Ecoregion
N
BA13
Baja California, Mexico
-115.75
30.12
Coastal chaparral
BC
2
BA14
Baja California, Mexico
-115.74
30.11
Coastal chaparral
BC
3
BA2
Baja California, Mexico
-115.00
30.00
Desert
BI
4
BA3
Baja California, Mexico
-114.13
29.05
Desert
BI
5
BA4
Baja California, Mexico
-115.44
30.06
Desert
BI
5
BA7
Baja California, Mexico
-115.57
30.05
Desert
BI
2
BA8
Baja California, Mexico
-114.11
28.78
Desert
BI
3
BA9
Baja California, Mexico
-113.68
27.90
Desert
BI
5
BA10
Baja California, Mexico
-113.60
27.79
Desert
BI
5
BA11
Baja California, Mexico
-113.43
27.64
Desert
BI
5
BA12
Baja California, Mexico
-114.32
27.51
Desert
BI
3
BA15
Baja California, Mexico
-115.52
30.04
Desert
BI
2
MA1
California, USA
-122.89
38.16
Coastal woodland
CC
2
MA2
California, USA
-122.80
38.04
Coniferous forest
CC
2
MA3
California, USA
-122.70
37.93
Coastal woodland
CC
3
MA4
California, USA
-122.92
38.09
Coniferous forest
CC
3
MA5
California, USA
-122.90
38.10
Coastal woodland
CC
3
MB4
California, USA
-120.81
35.31
Coastal woodland
CC
3
ME1
California, USA
-123.77
39.66
Coniferous forest
CC
3
ME2
California, USA
-123.78
39.28
Coniferous forest
CC
3
MO1
California, USA
-121.89
36.57
Coastal woodland
CC
2
1
MO3
California, USA
-121.87
36.39
Coastal woodland
CC
2
MO4
California, USA
-121.95
36.52
Oak woodland
CC
2
MO13
California, USA
-121.60
36.08
Coniferous forest
CC
3
SL9
California, USA
-121.09
35.56
Coniferous forest
CC
3
SL10
California, USA
-121.19
35.64
Coniferous forest
CC
3
SM
California, USA
-118.91
34.07
Coastal woodland
CC
3
SN1
California, USA
-122.39
37.36
Coastal woodland
CC
3
SO1
California, USA
-123.31
38.56
Coniferous forest
CC
3
SRI5
California, USA
-120.06
34.01
Coastal woodland
CC
2
CA1
California, USA
-120.50
38.27
Oak woodland
CN
3
CA2
California, USA
-120.63
38.05
Oak woodland
CN
3
CL1
California, USA
-121.71
37.13
Oak woodland
CN
3
CL2
California, USA
-121.75
37.36
Oak woodland
CN
3
CL3
California, USA
-121.67
37.32
Oak woodland
CN
3
ME3
California, USA
-123.01
38.83
Oak woodland
CN
3
ME4
California, USA
-123.22
39.08
Oak woodland
CN
3
MO7
California, USA
-121.55
36.39
Oak woodland
CN
3
MO8
California, USA
-121.44
36.27
Oak woodland
CN
3
MO10
California, USA
-121.61
36.42
Oak woodland
CN
3
MR1
California, USA
-121.20
37.06
Oak woodland
CN
3
NA1
California, USA
-122.28
38.78
Oak woodland
CN
3
NA2
California, USA
-122.15
38.49
Oak woodland
CN
3
SO4
California, USA
-122.50
38.44
Oak woodland
CN
3
SB2
California, USA
-121.46
36.79
Oak woodland
CN
3
SB3
California, USA
-121.14
36.50
Oak woodland
CN
3
BR1
California, USA
-120.28
34.73
Oak woodland
CS
3
MO5
California, USA
-121.08
36.04
Oak woodland
CS
3
MO6
California, USA
-121.31
36.06
Oak woodland
CS
3
MO9
California, USA
-121.15
36.10
Oak woodland
CS
3
MO11
California, USA
-121.34
35.98
Oak woodland
CS
3
MO12
California, USA
-121.12
35.94
Oak woodland
CS
3
SD
California, USA
-116.77
33.24
Coastal woodland
CS
3
SL5
California, USA
-120.86
35.53
Oak woodland
CS
2
SL6
California, USA
-120.92
35.79
Oak woodland
CS
4
SL7
California, USA
-120.93
35.67
Oak woodland
CS
3
SL8
California, USA
-120.55
35.66
Oak woodland
CS
3
OR11
Oregon, USA
-123.96
45.15
Coniferous forest
PN
3
OR14
Oregon, USA
-124.43
43.09
Coniferous forest
PN
3
2
OR16
Oregon, USA
-123.44
43.11
Broad-leaved forest
PN
4
OR17
Oregon, USA
-123.22
43.80
Broad-leaved forest
PN
5
OR18
Oregon, USA
-123.29
44.36
Broad-leaved forest
PN
5
HU1
California, USA
-124.16
41.13
Coniferous forest
PN
3
MI1
California, USA
-123.30
48.86
Oak woodland
PN
3
QC2
British Columbia, Canada
-131.99
54.03
Coniferous forest
PN
3
QC3
British Columbia, Canada
-131.93
53.56
Coniferous forest
PN
3
QC5
British Columbia, Canada
-131.70
53.13
Coniferous forest
PN
3
VI1
British Columbia, Canada
-125.76
49.07
Coniferous forest
PN
3
VI3
British Columbia, Canada
-123.51
48.70
Broad-leaved forest
PN
3
VI4
British Columbia, Canada
-124.09
48.43
Coniferous forest
PN
3
WA1
Washington, USA
-122.83
47.64
Broad-leaved forest
PN
3
WA2
Washington, USA
-123.03
48.05
Coniferous forest
PN
3
WA5
Washington, USA
-124.41
47.71
Coniferous forest
PN
3
3
Table S2 Number and position of recombination events of each DNA region used in
migration analyses.
Taxon
R. menziesii
DNA region
Number
Position
bet
efa
gpd
uid
1
2
1
1
620-810
2-192; 297-486
389-586
1-343
ITS
rbcL
2
1
1-240; 385-569
543-594
T. decolorans
4
Table S3 Haplotype distribution in each sampled localities of the lichen-forming
fungus R. menziesii (RHap1-RHap151) and the green algae photobiont T. decolorans
(THap1-THap58).
Ecoregions
Localities
Photobionts
Mycobionts
BC
BA13
THap1
RHap10, RHap11
BC
BA14
THap1
RHap12, RHap13, RHap14
BI
BA10
THap2
RHap1, RHap2, RHap3
BI
BA12
THap5
RHap1, RHap8, RHap9
BI
BA11
THap2, THap3, THap4
RHap1, RHap4, RHap5, RHap6, RHap7
BI
BA15
THap6, THap7
RHap15
BI
BA2
THap7
RHap16, RHap17, RHap18, RHap19
BI
BA3
THap7, THap8, THap9
RHap1, RHap2, RHap20
BI
BA4
THap7, THap10, THap11, THap12
RHap21, RHap22, RHap23, RHap24, RHap25
BI
BA7
THap1, THap13
RHap8, RHap22
BI
BA8
THap14, THap15, THap16
RHap1, RHap26, RHap27
BI
BA9
THap2, THap4, THap17
RHap1, RHap5, RHap28
CC
MA1
THap1
RHap47, RHap48
CC
MA2
THap1, THap18
RHap49, RHap50
CC
MA3
THap1
RHap51, RHap52
CC
MA4
THap1
RHap53, RHap54, RHap55
CC
MA5
THap1
RHap50, RHap56, RHap57
CC
MB4
THap1, THap19
RHap58, RHap59, RHap60
CC
ME1
THap1
RHap61, RHap62, RHap63
CC
ME2
THap1
RHap64, RHap65, RHap66
CC
MO1
THap1
RHap46, RHap76
CC
MO13
THap1
RHap46, RHap83, RHap84
CC
MO3
THap20, THap21
RHap85, RHap86
CC
MO4
THap1
RHap87, RHap88
CC
SL9
THap1, THap22
RHap135, RHap136, RHap137
CC
SL10
THap1, THap23, THap24
RHap124, RHap125, RHap126
CC
SM
THap11, THap25
RHap42, RHap138
CC
SN1
THap1, THap26
RHap139, RHap140, RHap141
CC
SO1
THap1, THap19
RHap46, RHap49, RHap142
CC
SRI5
THap1
RHap46, RHap144
CN
CA1
THap27, THap28, THap29
RHap32, RHap33, RHap34
CN
CA2
THap30
RHap35
CN
CL1
THap30, THap31, THap32
RHap36, RHap37, RHap38
CN
CL2
THap30, THap33, THap34
RHap29, RHap39, RHap40
5
CN
CL3
THap27, THap30, THap33
RHap41, RHap42, RHap43
CN
ME3
THap35, THap36, THap37
RHap67, RHap68, RHap69
CN
ME4
THap35, THap38
RHap41, RHap70, RHap71
CN
MO10
THap36, THap38
RHap38, RHap74, RHap75
CN
MO7
THap30, THap33, THap38
RHap36, RHap68, RHap92
CN
MO8
THap30, THap39, THap40
RHap93, RHap94, RHap95
CN
MR1
THap34, THap41
RHap41, RHap43
CN
NA1
THap27, THap38
RHap34, RHap98, RHap99, RHap100
CN
NA2
THap35, THap38
RHap35, RHap41, RHap92
CN
SO4
THap25, THap27, THap28
RHap41, RHap143
CN
SB2
THap33, THap36, THap38
RHap92, 118, RHap119
CN
SB3
THap26, THap42, THap43
RHap29, RHap43, RHap120
CS
BR1
THap43, THap44, THap45
RHap29, RHap30, RHap31, RHap38
CS
MO5
THap38, THap47, THap48
RHap33, RHap43, RHap89
CS
MO6
THap30, THap35, THap46
RHap68, RHap90, RHap91
CS
MO9
THap28, THap30, THap43
RHap41, RHap96, RHap97
CS
MO11
THap38, THap46
RHap77, RHap78, RHap79
CS
MO12
THap30, THap35, THap38
RHap80, RHap81, RHap82
CS
SD
THap30, THap49, THap50
RHap121, RHap122, RHap123
CS
SL5
THap25
RHap127, RHap128
CS
SL6
THap30, THap35, THap38, THap46
RHap77, RHap129, RHap130, RHap131
CS
SL7
THap30, THap35, THap38
RHap33, RHap132, RHap133
CS
SL8
THap26, THap38
RHap42, RHap43, RHap134
PN
HU1
THap1, THap19
RHap44, RHap45, RHap46
PN
MI1
THap31, THap53
RHap72, RHap73
PN
OR11
THap19, THap51
RHap46, RHap53
PN
OR14
THap1, THap19
RHap61, RHap101
PN
OR16
THap38
RHap102, RHap103, RHap104
PN
OR17
THap31, THap35, THap52
RHap56, RHap105, RHap106, RHap107
PN
OR18
THap28, THap30, THap33, THap36
RHap108, RHap109, RHap110, RHap111
PN
QC2
THap35, THap54
RHap112, RHap113, RHap114
PN
QC3
THap54
RHap113, RHap115, RHap116
PN
QC5
THap35
RHap114, RHap117
PN
VI1
THap1
RHap145
PN
VI3
THap26
RHap146, RHap147, RHap148
PN
VI4
THap35, THap56
RHap46, RHap149
PN
WA1
THap53
RHap72, RHap150
PN
WA2
THap35, THap57, THap58
RHap56, RHap151
PN
WA5
THap35
RHap53
6
Table S4 Co-divergence analyses of congruence between mycobionts and photobionts.
Boldface entries show localities that contributed significantly to the overall
congruence between mycobionts and photobionts at P< 0.01 level, based on both the
F1 and F2 tests.
Ecoregions
BC
BC
BI
BI
BI
BI
BI
BI
BI
BI
BI
BI
BI
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CN
CN
CN
CN
Localities
ParaFitLink1
ParaFitLink2
Fungi
Algae
F1
P1
F2
P2
RBA13
RBA14
RBA10
RBA11
RBA12
RBA15
RBA2
RBA3
RBA4
RBA7
RBA8
RBA9
RMA1
RMA2
RMA3
RMA4
RMA5
RMB4
RME1
RME2
RMO1
RMO13
RMO3
RMO4
RSL9
RSL10
RSM
RSN1
RSO1
RSRI5
RCA1
RCA2
RCL1
RCL2
RCL3
TBA13
TBA14
TBA10
TBA11
TBA12
TBA15
TBA2
TBA3
TBA4
TBA7
TBA8
TBA9
TMA1
TMA2
TMA3
TMA4
TMA5
TMB4
TME1
TME2
TMO1
TMO13
TMO3
TMO4
TSL9
TSL10
TSM
TSN1
TSO1
TSRI5
TCA1
TCA2
TCL1
TCL2
TCL3
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
>-0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
>-0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
>-0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
0.02100
0.03370
0.00010
0.00010
0.07431
0.00020
0.00010
0.00010
0.00850
0.98760
0.00010
0.00010
0.00860
0.00470
0.00630
0.00550
0.00560
0.00360
0.00530
0.00800
0.07241
0.00660
0.61466
0.00680
0.00390
0.98250
0.06821
0.00980
0.00580
0.00580
0.02610
0.02830
0.04170
0.02510
0.02610
0.00456
0.00396
0.04987
0.05446
0.00483
0.02732
0.05348
0.05207
0.01540
-0.00518
0.05270
0.05123
0.00227
0.00265
0.00244
0.00202
0.00256
0.00219
0.00192
0.00232
0.00060
0.00174
-0.00007
0.00132
0.00223
-0.00106
0.00044
0.00158
0.00188
0.00132
0.00149
0.00103
0.00131
0.00128
0.00074
0.01160
0.01950
0.00010
0.00010
0.05201
0.00020
0.00010
0.00010
0.00460
0.99350
0.00010
0.00010
0.00430
0.00140
0.00220
0.00190
0.00240
0.00120
0.00250
0.00330
0.04840
0.00240
0.63206
0.00330
0.00170
0.98790
0.04690
0.00450
0.00180
0.00240
0.01550
0.01660
0.02810
0.01520
0.01710
7
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
RME3
RME4
RMO10
RMO7
RMO8
RMR1
RNA1
RNA2
RSO4
RSB2
RSB3
RBR1
RMO5
RMO6
RMO9
RMO11
RMO12
RSD
RSL5
RSL6
RSL7
RSL8
TME3
TME4
TMO10
TMO7
TMO8
TMR1
TNA1
TNA2
TSO4
TSB2
TSB3
TBR1
TMO5
TMO6
TMO9
TMO11
TMO12
TSD
TSL5
TSL6
TSL7
TSL8
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
>-0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
<0.000005
0.02910
0.01960
0.11751
0.02280
0.03140
0.95520
0.08661
0.02420
0.07831
0.04930
0.03980
0.09161
0.01210
0.02000
0.02140
0.11521
0.04480
0.04110
0.02150
0.02850
0.07631
0.02360
0.00149
0.00137
0.00061
0.00146
0.00208
-0.00068
0.00058
0.00151
0.00047
0.00175
0.00135
0.00086
0.00141
0.00147
0.00179
0.00069
0.00126
0.00134
0.00322
0.00168
0.00100
0.00103
0.01800
0.01170
0.08261
0.01410
0.01980
0.97090
0.05921
0.01460
0.05351
0.03090
0.02530
0.06441
0.00530
0.01190
0.01360
0.08141
0.03220
0.02760
0.01430
0.01760
0.05481
0.01470
CS
RHU1
THU1
<0.000005
0.00350
0.00239
0.00110
PN
RMI1
TMI1
<0.000005
0.22672
0.00040
0.18222
PN
ROR11
TOR11
<0.000005
0.01800
0.00116
0.01170
PN
ROR14
TOR14
<0.000005
0.00570
0.00235
0.00220
PN
ROR16
TOR16
<0.000005
0.02430
0.00148
0.01390
PN
ROR17
TOR17
<0.000005
0.06411
0.00100
0.04220
PN
ROR18
TOR18
<0.000005
0.06561
0.00102
0.04310
PN
RQC2
TQC2
<0.000005
0.02540
0.00130
0.01550
PN
RQC3
TQC3
<0.000005
0.02700
0.00090
0.01650
PN
RQC5
TQC5
<0.000005
0.03150
0.00132
0.02130
PN
RVI1
TVI1
<0.000005
0.00640
0.00201
0.00290
PN
RVI3
TVI3
<0.000005
0.09471
0.00090
0.06281
PN
RVI4
TVI4
<0.000005
0.00760
0.00152
0.00290
PN
RWA1
TWA1
<0.000005
0.05191
0.00120
0.03400
PN
RWA2
TWA2
<0.000005
0.00410
0.00258
0.00150
PN
RWA5
TWA5
<0.000005
0.07611
0.00067
0.05011
8
Appendix S2 Details of phylogenetic tree analyses and supplementary figures.
Methods
To test whether the symbionts showed parallel phylogenies, we first performed a
Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of both mycobiont and photobiont sequence datasets.
The best-fit models (photobiont: HKY + I + G; mycobiont: GTR + I + G) for
Bayesian analyses were selected according to Akaike Information Criterion (AIC;
Akaike, 1974) using MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander, 2004) in conjunction with PAUP 4.0
(Swofford, 1998) to generate model scores. Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo
(BMCMC) estimates of phylogenies were inferred using MrBayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck
& Ronquist, 2005). Bayesian analysis was performed for 10,000,000 generations. Two
simultaneous chains were run sampling every 1,000 generations. The first 10% of
trees were discarded and > 50% posterior probability consensus trees were calculated
from the remaining trees. Bayesian trees were annotated in TreeAnnotator 1.6.0
(Rambaut & Drummond, 2009) and edited in FigTree 1.3.1 (Rambaut & Drummond,
2010). We rooted the photobiont tree using T. jamesii as an outgroup (Werth & Sork,
2014), and we rooted the mycobiont tree using R. sonorensis (Sork & Werth, 2014).
Results
Bayesian analysis of the 58 two-locus haplotypes of T. decolorans using T. jamesii as
outgroup resulted in three main haplotype groups (Group I-III; Fig. S1), with all the
haplotypes from two coastal ecoregions of PN and CC occurring in the Group I cluster.
Group I also included several haplotypes from two inland California ecoregions of
CN and CS. Four haplotypes (THap6, 10-12) of BI formed a subgroup (PP = 1.0) in
Group I. Only one haplotype (THap13) of BC was included in this group. The
Bayesian posterior probability (PP) of Group I was high (PP = 1.0). Most of the
haplotypes from two inland California ecoregions of CS and CN tended to group
together and formed the Group II; the Group III consisted of haplotypes only from the
ecoregion of BI.
The Bayesian tree based on 151 four-locus haplotypes of fungus R. menziesii
9
showed six main haplotype groups (Group A-F) and all the groups were supported by
a high posterior probability (PP > 90%; Fig. S2): Group A consisted of haplotypes
from two inland ecoregions of CS and CN; Group B consisted of several haplotypes
from ecoregion CS; the Group C consisted of all the haplotypes from two coastal
ecoregions of CC and PN; Group D consisted of the other haplotypes from the two
inland California ecoregions of CS and CN; the Group E consisted of all the
haplotypes from ecoregion BC, and the Group F consisted of all the haplotypes from
ecoregion BI.
References
Akaike, H. (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE
Transactions on Automatic Control 19,716-723.
Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. (2005) Bayesian analysis of molecular evolution
using MrBayes. Statistical Methods in Molecular Evolution (ed. by R. Nielsen),
pp.183-226. Springer, New York, USA.
Nylander, J.A.A. (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author.
Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A.J. (2009) TreeAnnotator v1.5.3: MCMC output analysis.
Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/TreeAnnotator.
Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A.J. (2010)) FigTree v1.3.1. Institute of Evolutionary
Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Available from
http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/.
Swofford, D.L. (1998) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other
methods), version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
10
Fig. S1 Phylogenetic tree of the green algal photobiont (T. decolorans) haplotypes
(THap1-THap58) estimated using Bayesian approach. Numbers associated with each
branch indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (branch supports of over 0.50
posterior probability are shown). The tree was rooted using the outgroup species T.
jamesii.
11
Fig. S2 Phylogenetic tree of the lichen-forming fungus R. menziesii haplotypes
(RHap1-RHap151) estimated using Bayesian approach. Numbers associated with
each branch indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (branch supports of over 0.50
posterior probability are shown). Tree was rooted using the outgroup species R.
sonorensis.
12
Download