Associate Professor, Teaching Scholar, Self

advertisement
Office of BioMed Faculty Administration
233 Richmond St, Room 240
bmfa@brown.edu
Faculty Self-Assessment: Am I on track for promotion?
Associate Professor | Teaching Scholar
Criteria for Associate Professor, Teaching Scholar
The faculty member has assumed a major teaching role in a university program (e.g., leadership of or a major contribution
to a required course, residency or fellowship program, or in a substantial elective course offered yearly). Excellence and
innovation in teaching attested by students and also, if possible, by peers, is a major requirement for this appointment. The
individual must have a national reputation in his/her area. The individual will be evaluated by letters from outstanding
faculty in the field outside Brown University who are asked to compare the candidate with others in his/her national peer
group and to indicate their support for promotion or appointment. A continuous record of scholarly publications, which
includes peer-reviewed publications and may include textbooks, curriculum models, descriptions of clinical issues, audiovisual materials, or book chapters, is also expected. Exceptional clinical skills are accorded positive consideration. Also
considered favorably are service contributions to the university or the hospital when a significant role can be documented.
Appointment at this rank is for renewable five-year terms.
Note: To add additional rows in any section, simply hit tab with the cursor in the last field of the chart.
Mentors
Current mentor
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Brown faculty appointments
Title
Dates
Assistant professor
Instructor
Other faculty appointments
Title
Institution
Dates
Education
Program
Location
Dates
Fellowship
Residency
Medical school
Area of study
Faculty Self-Assessment | Associate | Teaching Scholar
rev 7/2015
1
Criterion #1
Faculty member has assumed a major teaching role in a university program.
Teaching responsibilities and leadership
Position/role (current and past)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: site director, program director, residency/fellowship director, mock oral examiner
Program/curriculum development
Program/curriculum (current and past)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
University courses taught
Course/role (current and past)
Examples: course/seminar instructor, section leader, lecturer, small group leader, facilitator, clerkship director/supervisor, elective
director, doctoring course, journal club organizer, longitudinal clerkship
Hospital courses taught/office-based teaching
Course/role (current and past)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: attending, consult, preceptor, rotation director, hospital-based lectures/conferences/clinics, teaching faculty, teaching
rounds, clinical supervisor
Mentoring/advising
Trainee type
# current trainees
# past trainees
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Undergraduates
Medical students
Graduate students
Residents
Fellows
Postdocs
Other
Criterion #2
Faculty member has demonstrated excellent skills and innovation as an educator.
Teaching awards and recognition
Award/honor
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Teaching evaluations
Scores/ratings
Criterion #3
Faculty member has a national reputation as a teaching scholar in his/her discipline.
Journal reviewer
Journal (list or total #) (current and past)
Faculty Self-Assessment | Associate | Teaching Scholar
rev 7/2015
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
2
Editorial boards
Journal/role (current and past)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Professional societies/other organizations
Organization/role (current and past)
Examples: state or national health board or task force, industry task force, specialty board accrediting bodies, scientific advisory boards,
society session moderator
National institute reviewer/study sections
Institute/section (current past)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Invited presentations
Presentation type
# of presentations
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Local/regional
Domestic
International
Criterion #4
Faculty member has a continuous record of scholarly productivity.
Publications
# of publications
(first/senior author)*
Publication type
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Original, peer-reviewed publications
Other peer-reviewed publications
Books/book chapters
Other non-peer-reviewed publications
Corporate authorships or multicenter trials
Scholarly work in other media
Other
*Enter total number, then number as first/senior author in parentheses. Example: 15 (5) indicates 15 publications with five of those as first or senior author.
Abstract presentations
# of abstract presentations
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Grants (awarded)
Role (current and past)
# of grants ($)^
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Principal investigator
Co-investigator
Other
^Include funding amount in parentheses
Grants (submitted and pending or unfunded)
Role (current and past)
# of grants
Principal investigator
Co-investigator
Other
Faculty Self-Assessment | Associate | Teaching Scholar
rev 7/2015
3
Research awards and recognition
Award/honor
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Patents
Patents
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Criterion #5
Other clinical skills and service contributions to the university or hospital will be given positive consideration.
Clinical positions
Position title (current and past)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: staff physician, director/chief of clinical service, attending, section chief
Clinical awards and recognition
Award/honor
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: Top Physician/Best Doctors/Who’s Who listing, fellow in professional society, hospital award
University service
Service role/activity (current and past)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: admissions, clinical faculty advisory committee
Hospital service
Service role/activity (current and past)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Foundation service
Service role/activity (current and past)
Other service
Service role/activity (current and past)
Criterion #6
A minimum of eight external reviewers are required. Four must be selected by the department and four by the candidate.
All reviewers must be external to Brown and at the rank of associate or full professor. Reviewers should be able to
comment on the quality of teaching and discuss the candidate’s stature compared to national peer group.
Potential local/regional external reviewers
Name
Institution
Rank
Field/area
Rank
Field/area
Potential national/international external reviewers
Name
Institution
Faculty Self-Assessment | Associate | Teaching Scholar
rev 7/2015
4
Download