NATURE AND THE NATURE RESEARCH JOURNALS PRESS RELEASE
This press release is copyrighted to the Nature journals mentioned below. Its use is granted
only for journalists and news media receiving it directly from the Nature research journals.
*** PLEASE DO NOT REDISTRIBUTE THIS DOCUMENT ***
For papers that will be published online on 24 November 2014
EMBARGO:
1600 London Time (GMT) / 1100 US Eastern Time Monday 24 November 2014
0100 Japanese Standard Time / 0300 Australian Eastern Time Tuesday 25 November 2014
Wire services’ stories must always carry the embargo time at the head of each item, and may
not be sent out more than 24 hours before that time.
Solely for the purpose of soliciting informed comment on Nature research journal papers, you
may show relevant parts of this document, and the papers to which it refers, to independent
specialists – but you must ensure in advance that they understand and accept Nature
Publishing Group’s embargo conditions.
[1] Climate Change: Winter warming and climate beliefs
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2443
Warmer-than-usual temperatures influence people’s perception of how the climate is warming but not
their attribution of such warming to human causes, reports a paper published online this week
in Nature Climate Change.
People’s perception of environmental changes (including temperature anomalies) tends to be
accurate, aligning with instrumental measurements; however it is unclear whether perceived
environmental changes have an impact on beliefs about climate change.
Aaron McCright and colleagues analyse the impact of winter 2012 temperature
measurements in the contiguous United States (the fourth warmest winter on record in the country
since 1895) and political orientation on warmer-than-usual temperatures perception and people’s
attribution of such unusual temperatures to human-induced climate change. They merged state-level
winter temperature measurements with individual-level survey data from Gallup’s 2012 environmental
poll. The poll data included information on political ideology, party identification, perceived scientific
agreement about the occurrence of global warming and existing climate change beliefs.
Their results show that actual temperature data have a strong influence on perception of
temperature anomalies, but do not drive attribution of such anomalies to human-induced climate
change. Instead, perceived scientific consensus, existing beliefs and political orientation significantly
explain both perception and attribution.
These results suggest that, across the US, perceived warming can induce adaptive
behaviour, but is at present unlikely to build public support for policies to mitigate carbon emissions.
CONTACT
Aaron McCright (Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA)
Tel: +1 517 432 8026; E-mail: [email protected]
Please link to the scientific paper in online versions of your report (the URL will go live after the
embargo ends):
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2443