Commissioning

advertisement

Commissioning

Iain Marley

Commissioning Officer – Children

Commissioning Systems Development – South

South Tees Clinical Commissioning Group

….and today, I’m….

The “Acceptable Face” of NHS Tees

Context – the overall picture

• 42 major contracts across NHS Tees

• Majority are nationally mandated standard contracts:

NHS Standard Acute Contract - NTHFT, STHFT, Nuffield,

Ramsay etc

NHS Standard Community Contract - North Tees

Community Provider, MRCCS, Assura Sexual Health,

Hospices etc

NHS Standard Mental Health Contract - TEWV, Alliance,

MIND etc.

• Total Contract Budget of £856m

• Over 200 providers

• QIPP Challenge

QIPP Challenge: 2012/2013

Middlesbrough

Redcar &

Cleveland

Total Tees

Acute Services

- Planned Care

- Urgent Care

Prescribing

Estate and “Other”

Total

£469,000

£2,000,000

£1,375,000

£1,536,000

£5,380,000

£2,000,000 £2,469,000 £3,269,000

£5,434,000 £7,434,000 £10,557,000

£1,242,000 £2,617,000 £5,031,000

£420,000 £1,956,000 £2,946,000

£9,096,000 £14,476,000 £21,803,000

Contract Negotiation Constraints

• 12/13 Affordability versus Forecast Outturn activity/cost

• SHA/DH expectations

– Operating Framework requirements must be negotiated in to contracts

– Deadlines for contract signature

FAILURE TO AGREE WITH PROVIDERS WILL RESULT IN NOT HAVING A SIGNED

CONTRACT AND CCGS AFFECTED WON’T ACHIEVE AUTHORISATION

• Clinicians views are not necessarily the organisation’s views

• Payment by Results (PBR)

– It is in the Foundation Trusts (FTs) interests to grow their business

– Commissioners are immediately on the back foot once a patient enters “the system” – “Patient Pinball”

• FTs will exploit Primary Care’s inability to manage demand

• “It is what it is” – a negotiation: we don’t get everything we want!

Contract Negotiation Constraints

• Delayed publication of Operating Framework and

Standard National Contracts

• Lack of evidence based, clinically credible proposals resisted as unsafe/high risk to FTs

• New services/changes to pathways – “Pilot Vs.

Procurement”

• Overall impact of Commissioning Intentions:

– Don’t do anything which may increase overall costs

– Consider system wide impacts on other stakeholders, e.g. Social Care

Timetable

Meanwhile, back in the land of

Clinical Commissioning…

NHS Hartlepool and Stockton on Tees

Clinical Commissioning Group

– Hartlepool CCG

– Stockton-On-Tees CCG

South Tees Clinical Commissioning Group

– Middlesbrough CCG

– Redcar and Cleveland CCG

– Greater Eston CCG

Clinical Commissioning Agenda

• Still in process of formation

– Structures

– Leadership

– Priorities

• Heavy Authorisation Process

• Wide Agenda

– CAMHS IS part of it – we do have clinical engagement!

CAMHS Priorities

• Earlier intervention in CYPs Emotional Health and Well-being

• Shifting resources upstream through 2 priorities:

CAMHS service transformation (TEWV CAMHS contract – changing the core service to deliver accessible, community based services)

Developing Tier 1 and 2 services

• Co-ordinating commissioning across Tees

• Developing/increasing the capacity of the broader delivery system – schools, VCOs

Progress to date

Strategic CAMHS Stakeholder Group – meets monthly - LA rep, GPs, Head Teacher and VSO rep – increased commitment to CYP’s MH

Strategic Tees-wide Plan - response to NST review, needs assessment - mapping of ‘tier 2’ services

TEWV CAMHS Performance dashboard - using new

Info management system in TEWV

• Service transformation funding agreed….

BOND – capacity building in early intervention MH third sector services

Aims

Aim to drive down T3 referrals - increase earlier intervention, and increase capacity within other services through consultation, training and shared, co-ordinated pathways

Potential non-recurring - £0.5m

– fund increased activity and development at tier 2

– embed workforce plan for sustaining new service model

– manage risk/existing demand at tier 3/4

£200k ring-fenced for third sector sub contracting – to extend good practice in pathway development and increase access for vulnerable groups

Why now?

Funding window – speedy action required

NHS capacity to drive change through commissioning

Financial climate – mitigate impact of early intervention cuts

BOND – building interest and momentum

– Schools – interest in funding services

– Improving quality of VCS/alternative providers

– Identifying and sharing models of good practice

Next steps…

Strengthen LA/NHS commissioning

– co-ordinating/joint commissioning for LAC, VSO etc

– commissioning with/by schools for early intervention support in schools

Develop outcomes framework - for CYPs MH services Tier 1 – 3 – as a basis for commissioning

Develop core TEWV offer/spec

Commission training programme from CAMHS for T1 and 2 service providers as part of service transformation

Download