CIVIL/MILITARY
WORKSHOP
FABCE
ASM/ATFCM process
Validation Plan
Stjepan Varga
Brussels, 20.09.2012
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Step approach
Distinction of ASM/ATFCM process and organisational enablers
GO/NO GO to move next step
Starting from national ASM/ATFCM integration process
Regional ASM/ATFCM process final goal
Organisational solution to be evaluated in due time
Timeframe to consider 2012-2015 for realistic implementation
Changes subject to validation before GO/NO GO decision.
ATFCM/ASM Functional Models
• Model A - Optimizing the current situation
• Role: Existing roles continue with additional FABCE Network
management
• Model B - Optimizing the current situation, applying LEAD AMC
• Role: Existing roles continue with additional LAED AMC to support
FABCE ASM management
• Model C - FABCE ATFCM coordination function, and national ASM
• Role: A FABCE Network ATFCM Centre
• Model D - FABCE ASM coordination function, and national ATFCM
• Role: FABCE Network ASM Centre
• Model E - FABCE ATFCM/ASM coordination function
• Role: FABCE Network Operations Centre
3
4
High Level Objectives
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination
procedures at national level;
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination
procedures at FAB level using national Structures
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination
procedures at FAB level using Lead AMC Concept
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination
procedures between national structure/Lead AMCs
and NM
• Assess usability of different ASM planning and
coordination tools, which could be applied in FAB CE
operational environment;
Geographical Scope
CZ
CZ YES – FL or Areas
 AT YES – FL or Areas
 SK YES – FL or Areas
 HU YES – FL or Areas
 SL YES – FL or Areas
 HR YES – FL or Areas
 BiH NO
SK

AT
SL
HU
HR
BiH
Procedures - Scope
• D-7/D-2
• D-1 AUP
FABCE – Potential Traffic on Night
Segments if available H24
Traffic sample for Friday 14/10/2011
Numbers show flights on segment for the
period 0500-2300
MODEL A
AMC
AMC
AMC
FP
FP
AA
FMP
AMC
AA
FP
FMP
FMP
FMP
AA
NMAD
FAB
AA
AA
AA
AA
FMP
FMP
FMP
Live trial positive feedback
– Communication
– Coordination among actors
– Harmonisation of UQ 863 publication
– FAB CE administrator
– Rotation principle for FAB CE administrator
– General Systems support feasible
Live trial issues
• Procedures
–
–
–
–
–
Respect timeline for uploading and publication
Respect of sequence of tasks
Confusion for weekend consolidation
Confusion for contingency procedure application (different procedures?)
Missed network coordination
• NOP Publications
–
–
–
–
–
Status publish for national files (FMP)
Wrong information in files
Wrong templates
Confusion for D-2/6 files
Inconsistency of information (FAB AUP vs EAUP)
• Systems
– LARA connection – internet
– NOP connection
12
MODEL C
AMC
AMC
AMC
FP
AMC
AA
FMP
AMC
AA
FP
FMP
AA
FMP
FMP
FMP
AA
NM
AA
FMP
AA
AA
FATFCM
FMP
MODEL D
AMC
AMC
AMC
AMC
AA
AMC
FP
AA
FP
FMP
FMP
AA
FMP
FMP
FMP
AA
FASM
AA
FMP
AA
AA
NM
FMP
MODEL E
AMC
AMC
AMC
FP
AMC
AA
AMC
AA
FP
FMP
FMP
AA
FMP
FMP
FMP
AA
FATFCM
FASM
AA
FMP
AA
AA
NM
FMP
High Level Objectives
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination
procedures at FAB level using FAB ATFCM
coordinator
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination
procedures at FAB level using FAB ASM coordinator
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination
procedures at FAB level using FAB ASM/ATFCM
coordinator
• Assess the feasibility of ASM/ATFCM coordination
procedures between FAB ASM/ATFCM coordinator
and NM
Operational scenario
•
•
•
•
CDRs cross borders
CDR synchronisation
CBAs
ATFM scenarios
– Alignment sector configurations/opening schemes
– Alignment ATFM measures
• Level capping
• Re-routings
RTS Technical Layout
Predict, NOP
Predict, NOP
Predict, NOP
LARA, CIAM
NOP
LARA, CIAM
NOP
LARA, CIAM
NOP
Predict, NOP
Predict, SIMEX,
NOP
Predict, SIMEX,
NOP
LARA, CIAM
NOP
LARA, CIAM
NOP
LARA, CIAM
NOP
Predict, NOP
Predict, NOP
Predict, NOP
LARA, CIAM
NOP
LARA, CIAM
NOP
LARA, CIAM
NOP