Annual Review of Courses: Postgraduate Research
Reflecting on the Academic Year 2014/15
This report should be completed by the Graduate Director (or equivalent academic staff responsible for PGR provision) and signed by the Head of Department. Please send a
copy of the report to Hannah Lamb (email: hlamb@essex.ac.uk) in the Registry (Research Team) by noon on Monday 1 February 2016.
Purpose:
 To review and evaluate the course to inform quality assurance and enhancement
 To develop action plans that ensure the enhancement of the programmes under review
 To ensure excellence in the quality of education
 To identify and share good practice
Name of Department solely or principally responsible for
courses under review
Date report discussed by Department:
A response should be provided covering the following research degrees:
PhD, MPhil, Professional Doctorate, Doctoral Programme, Integrated PhD and Masters by Dissertation.
Course ID
Courses to which this report applies (Please add or delete rows as necessary)
Course Title
1
Number of students on the course (all years of
study) in the year under review
Total number of students:
Report Author(s)
Which Departmental Committees have considered this
report?
Head of Department Signature_______________________________________________________
(I confirm that the information provided in this report is a correct record)
SUBMISSION DEADLINE: By noon on Monday 1 February 2016.
2
Section One
Update on Action Plan from last year’s Annual Review of Courses: Postgraduate Research 1
(Please add rows as necessary)
Please state the action taken as an outcome of last year’s Annual Review of Courses: Postgraduate Research
Action
Progress
1
2
3
1
The name of the annual Research Degree Programme Review process changed to Annual Review of Courses: Postgraduate Research in January 2015. For 2014/15
report, please comment on the action plan from the 2013/14 PGR ARC form.
3
Section Two
Please complete the following table and comment on the data for your department.
Data for 2014/15
1.
a
b
2.
a.
b.
3.
a.
b.
4.
a.
b.
5.
a.
b.
6.
a.
b.
c.
7.
a.
Admissions
Admissions (target)
i.
Home & EU
ii.
Overseas
Admissions (actual)
i.
Home & EU
ii.
Overseas
Confirmation
Of those due to be confirmed, how many were confirmed at
the first opportunity?
Of those due to be confirmed, how many had their decision
deferred?
Submissions
Of the number of students who submitted their thesis for
examination this year, how many submitted within 4 years?
Of the number of students who submitted their thesis for
examination this year, how many submitted beyond 4 years?
Completions
Of the number of students who completed this year (i.e. had
their award conferred), how many completed within 5 years?
Of the number of students who completed this year (i.e. had
their award conferred), how many completed beyond 5
years?
Non-completions
Number of those awarded an MPhil as a lesser award than
registered for
Number of students who submitted and left with no award
(fail)
Withdrawals
Total number of withdrawals during the year
Number of students who were required to withdraw due to
academic reasons this year
Number of students who withdrew and were in their first year
of study this year
Intermissions
Total number of students who entered into a period of
intermission during the year
Data unavailable for 2014/15
Data unavailable for 2014/15
4
Please comment on data where necessary, including any
action required, action taken, targets set
b.
c.
d.
8.
a.
b.
9.
a.
b.
10.
a.
b.
c.
11.
a.
Total number of students who were on a period of
intermission for the entire academic year
Total number of students who were on a period of
intermission at the beginning of the year, but returned to their
studies during the year
Total number of students who were on a period of
intermission and subsequently withdrew from the University
Appeals
Number of appeals upheld
Number of appeals dismissed
Complaints
Number of complaints upheld
Number of complaints dismissed
Employability
Number of students employed as Graduate Teaching Staff
(GTAs, Graduate Demonstrators and Graduate Laboratory
Assistants)
Number of students who completed Cadenza
Number of students taking up study abroad opportunities
b.
Supervisors
Number of active supervisors in department (either as main
or joint)
Number of professional practice supervisors
c.
Supervisor workload allocation (hours)
12.
a.
Proficio
Number of Proficio courses attended by students
Data to be provided by
Department/School/Centre
Data to be provided by
Department/School/Centre
Data to be provided by
Department/School/Centre
Data to be provided by
Department/School/Centre
5
Section Three
Following the review within your department and drawing on your comments in Section Two, please comment on the following (using as evidence the most
recent PRES, SSLC, progression, retention, completion and achievement data, any feedback from individual External Examiners, feedback from sponsors and
external funding bodies and any other departmental monitoring systems in place.)
What has been successful this year, including areas of good practice that could be shared?
What issues have arisen this year, and what will require monitoring in the forthcoming year?
6
Section Four
Please confirm the following:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2
Process
Evidence
e.g. dates of meetings and
minutes, website links
Student involvement with quality assurance and enhancement
Students are consulted in the Annual Review of Courses for postgraduate research
provision process.2
Action Plans from the Annual Review of Courses for postgraduate research provision are
regularly reviewed and fed back to students.3
The department disseminates issues and actions arising from PRES.
Actions identified in the SSLC minutes are followed up and outcomes reported to
subsequent meetings.
Other forums or methods are used to obtain PGR student feedback.
Learning, Teaching and Supervision
All supervisors have received adequate training.
All new supervisors have been allocated mentors.4
A record is kept of all supervisory meetings.
The allocation of supervision hours is met.
The department monitors student engagement and progress.
All supervisors are provided with a URL for the Code of Practice for Research Degrees.
The department supports students whilst they are gathering data/ attending training
abroad.
Student Performance and Progression
All students (except those prevented by illness or other good reasons) have two
supervisory boards and RSPCs each year (one for part-time, including part-time Distance
Learning students) and a record is kept of the meetings.
The department publishes, reviews and updates clear milestones for confirmation to staff
and students.
The department publishes, reviews and updates clear milestones for progression to the
next stage of study and for completion to staff and students.
Two Research Student Progress Committees (RSPCs) are held per year.
RSPC members are provided with adequate training.
Systems are in place to ensure all eligible students have had supervisory boards and that
the RSPCs have reviewed board outcomes.
Training, Skills and Employability
Students and supervisors identify, discuss and update student training needs (Training
Needs Analysis) at Supervisory Boards and RSPCs.
The annual Research Degree Programme Review process changed its name to Annual Review of Courses: Postgraduate Research in January 2015.
The annual Research Degree Programme Review process changed its name to Annual Review of Courses: Postgraduate Research in January 2015.
4 ‘A new supervisor’ is defined as ‘a supervisor who has not supervised a student through to completion’.
7
3
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Having analysed students’ training needs, there are sufficient and relevant courses offered
internally, available through Proficio or external providers.
There are sufficient Proficio funds and departmental funds to cover the costs of students’
training.
External Examiners, Sponsors, Employers and Other funding bodies
Issues raised by viva external examiners are discussed and acted upon.
Issues raised by sponsors, employers and other funding bodies are discussed and acted
upon.
Action taken is reported to sponsors, employers and other funding bodies.
Research resources and intellectual climate
The department provides dedicated workspace and social space specifically for PGR
students.
The department provides funding for PGR students to attend conferences.
The department provides funding for PGR led activities.
The department provides opportunities for PGR students to join departmental and other
research groups.
Students have the opportunity to interact with staff other than their supervisor, including
research active staff and researchers working at the highest level in the student’s chosen
field. Students have involvement in knowledge exchange with people and organisations
using research outcomes in their work.
The department encourages a sense of community amongst the PGR cohort and wider
research community and encourages the development of peer support networks.
The department ensures that students have access to welfare and support facilities that
recognise the distinctive nature of research degree study.
Communication
The department disseminates information and implements changes to policies, procedures
and guidance relating to PGR provision following decisions of University committees of
Senate.
Students are informed of where to obtain regulations.
8
Section Five
Please confirm the following:
1
2
3
4
Yes/No
Training, Skills and Employability
Does the department offer advanced-level/level 8 (post-Masters) training
(through Proficio or otherwise)?
Does the department offer internships and work experience
opportunities?
Learning, Teaching and Supervision
What materials are students required to submit in advance of supervisory
board meetings?
Have all supervisors received adequate support (e.g. mentors are
allocated)?
9
Process
Evidence
e.g. dates of meetings and minutes,
website links
Section Six: PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATES ONLY
Please confirm the following
1
2
3
Process
Professional Practice Supervisors
The Department has an up-to-date list of all professional doctorate students and their
professional practice supervisors, including replacement supervisors if a member of staff is
on leave
All professional practice supervisors have received a copy of (or URL for) the Code of
Practice on Professional Doctorates
All professional practice supervisors have received information on departmental
arrangements for supervision and appropriate training
10
Evidence
e.g. dates of meetings and
minutes, website links
Section Seven
Action plan
In response to the review please outline the actions for the academic year
Objective
Action
Responsibility
Timescale
11
Progress to date