Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
School Name: Lakeshore
Elementary
P
Year: 2013-2014
Current NCLB Status: AYP Met
Current ABC Status: School of Excellence
PLAN: Identify the gap and the approach
4th/5th Grade SMART Goal twoyear projection By 2014-2015, the number of students in Tier II will be reduced by 50% as measured by AIMSWEB
data.
K-3 Grade SMART Goal two year projection: By 2014-2015, the number of students in the yellow and red status will be reduced by 50% as measured
by 3D Composite data.
Grades 3-5 will increase overall proficiency from 87.4% to 95% as measured by EOG by 2014-2015
The percent of students showing growth from CA 1 to CA 4 will increase from 91% to 100% by 2014-2015 and 100% of all subgroups will show
growth.
Data Analysis. Answer the question below using any data and/or information you have about your performance.
Page 1
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Kinder LNF 2012-2013
Kinder LSF 2012-2013
Page 2
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Kinder PSF 2012-2013
Kinder NSF 2012-2013
Page 3
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
First Grade Fluency 2012-2013
Second Grade Fluency 2012-2013
Page 4
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Third Grade Fluency 2012-2013
Fourth Grade Fluency 2012-2013
Page 5
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Fifth Grade Fluency 2012-2013
Page 6
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
2012-2013 Reading Fidelity Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Aug-Oct
Nov-Dec
tim
e
o.
ef
at
..
d
fie
rti
ce
r
co
e
ob
...
db
ee
k
ac
.
r..
en
flu
c..
d
ith
ed
nd
i
te
s
/
w
r
F
a
a
a
d
t
w
g
e
n
m
b
s
il
op
er
co
kin
t iv
up
sig
bu
pr
ch
r
c
d
e
r
o
p
o
e
o
r
o
n
t
a
t
g
ea
w
rr
gd
n
du
ed
es
ng
up
in
ts
Co
o
i
r
n
n
l
r
i
o
/
k
,
a
t
g
u
r
u
y
d
li
g
or
en
el
Ad
n
ve
gd
ow
w
ka
rv
m
e
o
n
s
io
i
l
ir n
s
r
e
i
t
k
T
t
p
Ta
s
ab
In
cu
en
c,
ing
ap
nt
ail
rv
ifi
d
e
g
v
Oc
c
e
a
t
e
in
la
ud
In
Re
Sp
St
Us
Al
on
m
...
Dec-Feb
Mar-Apr
Apr.-May
Reading Success and Corrective Reading Fidelity 2012-2013
Cycle 3
Reading Success:
Total Walks-5
Total Possible Look Fors-65
Total Yes Responses- 61=93.8% yes
Total No Responses-None
Total Items Marked as N/A-4-6.2%
Page 7
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Corrective Reading:
Total Walks:11
Total Possible Look Fors=297
Average Fidelity Rating for all walks: 2.68 (on a scale of 1=Appropriate, 2=Somewhat Appropriate, 3=Appropriate)
Not Observed Marked 27 Times=9%
Cycle 4
Reading Success:
Total Walks-5
Total Possible Look Fors-65
Total Yes Responses- 65=100%yes
Total No Responses-None
Total Items Marked as N/A-None
Corrective Reading:
Total Walks:5
Total Possible Look Fors=135
Average Fidelity Rating for all walks: 2.73 (on a scale of 1=Appropriate, 2=Somewhat Appropriate, 3=Appropriate)
Not Observed Marked 6 times 4.44%
Page 8
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
2012-2013 CA Subgroup Data
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
CA 1
30
20
CA 3
CA 2
CA4
Grades K-5 20112012
Overall
93
C3
88
AI
G
D
M
ale
Fe
m
ale
M
ul
ti
SW
LE
P
ED
% of Individual Students Showing CA Growth 2012-2013
First
Second
Third
Fourth
K
C2
80
Hi AA
sp
an
ic
Am Asi
er an
. In
di
an
W
hit
e
10
0
C4
91
C2
89
C3
96
C4
100
C2
76
C3
85
C4
91
C2
69
Page 9
C3
78
C4 C2
84 71
C3
80
Fifth
C4
95
C2
66
C3
80
C4
84
Grades K-5
2012-2013
Overall
91
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
2012-2013 EOG Data Unavailable until October 2013
% Proficient EOG Lakeshore Elementary
Percent Proficient
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
Series1
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011-
Series1 93.20 81.40 84.70 83.20 81.40 87.40
Year
Data Analysis. Answer the data analysis questions.
1. What is contributing to your success in
this area and how do you know?
Strengths: K-triangles for reading Letter
Naming Fluency 92% green Spring,
Nonsense word fluency 94%
2. What opportunities for improvement do you
notice?
3rd, 4th, 5th Grade Fluency
OFI’S-3rd , 4th, 5th grade reading fluency spring all
Page 10
3. What seems to be the root cause of
the problem and how do you know?
Grade 3-5 need support for how to focus
more on building strong fluency during
core instruction, All grades use Core
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
First Grade Fluency 85% in green, Second
grade fluency 81% green, Fifth grade fluency
shows steady trend of improvement, Strong
reading fluency data in K-2 indicates a
reduction for students that will be needing
additional support in grades 3-5
Fidelity data indicates that look fors are
occurring more than 90% of the time in most
areas.
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
below 80%
Fidelity data shows need for focus on specific and
corrective feedback. Make sure that all available
adults are working with students.
Need to increase fluency in the core as supported
by number of students in yellow/red AIMS.
Reading Success and Corrective Reading
Implementation is improving with ongoing
support. Reading Success at 100% in Cycle 4
Phonics Survey to drill down to literacy
gap and provide aligned intervention.
Identify student early and provide
intervention at tier 1 level before student
needs to move to tier 2. Focus on grades
k-3 moving to Reading 3D-taking the
place of AIMS reading. Monitor
interventions with fidelity through
frequent progress monitoring…if not
working must move to something new.
Be creative with scheduling so that
students are able to receive interventions
that they need. Use AIMS and 3D data to
support enrichment as well for students
needing to move beyond. Look for ways
to increase student engagement during
Core instruction.
Target SMART Goal (One year projection based on the answer to question 2 above.):
By 2013-2014 Lakeshore Students in grades 3-5 will increase proficiency from 87.4 to 91% as measured by the End of Grade Reading Test. By 20132014, the percent of students showing growth in grades K-5 will increase from 91% to 97% as measured by CA. We will reduce students in tier 2
interventions by 50% (from 85 students to 43 students) as measured by AIMs/3D data. 100% of students in enrichment will demonstrate growth as
measured by AIMs/3D data.
Page 11
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
What will you do during cycle 1 (Identify key approach or strategy you will implement during cycle 1 to move toward achieving your target goal.)?
Implement RtI Diamond Model –with clearly defined core that provides for increased student engagement and is supported by Balanced Literacy,
Foundations of Reading, Common Core and a clearly defined tier II that incorporates a targeted intervention block and enrichment block.
D
Step
#
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
DO: Develop and Implement Deployment Plan
Cycle 1 List the specific steps your team will
complete during the first cycle.
Person(s)
responsible for
completion of the
step.
Measure/Indicator
(How will you know if the
step is completed correctly?)
Start Date
Continue Training of Common Core, Reading
Foundations, Balanced Literacy
Continue to implement Balanced Literacy, Common
Core and strategies of Reading foundations during
core instruction
Ongoing RtI coaching from core team (RtI pilot)
Offer refresher training and new training for new staff
for AIMS web screener and progress monitoring.
Administer universal screener, AIMS/3D , to all
students and identify students that will be targeted
during core instruction and tier II intervention block.
Continue implementation of core instruction that
incorporates Reading Foundations, Common Core,
Blevins/Reavis
LES Core Chart
8/26/13
6/11/14
Hinson/Semanko
ERD
8/26/13
6/11/14
RtI trainers
Semanko
Agendas/Minutes
Agenda from training
8/26/13
8/26/13
6/11/14
10/1/13
Semanko
Classroom
Teachers
Semanko
List or at-risk students
8/26/13
10/1/13
Lesson Plans
8/26/13
6/11/14
Page 12
End Date
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
#7
#8a
#8b
#9
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Balanced Literacy with focus on fluency in the core.
Train the systematic intervention/enrichment
Hinson
PD Agenda/Minutes and sign 8/26/13
programs Reading Mastery, Corrective and Reading
in
Success.
Letterland Training k-2
Hinson
CEU’s/TNL
8/26/13
Implement
Hinson
Teir II Pirate Time Lesson
8/26/13
Reading Mastery K-2 and other intervention programs
Plans
10/1/13
10/1/13
10/1/13
Grade level teams with support of RtI team develop a
plan for tier II intervention/enrichment to deliver
program and other supports.
Schedule 4 data days, one each quarter, to review
AIMS data and other data points to determine next
steps.
Ongoing support through PLC’s and ERD for the RtI
plan, Reading Foundations, Balanced Literacy, and
Common Core
Revisit, Improve, Implement Fidelity tools to be used
for monitoring tier II remediation and enrichment
block based on agreed non-negotiables.
Revisit and administer Universal CA to all students
Analyze Universal CA to identify students for
enrichment block
Coughlin/Dagenh
art /Hill
Completed tier 2 chart
8/26/13
10/1/13
Hinson
Data Agenda/Minutes
8/26/13
6/11/13
Semanko
Agenda/Minutes
8/26/13
6/11/13
Blevins/Reavis
Fidelity tool
8/26/13
10/1/13
Blevins/Reavis
Blevins/Reavis
8/26/13
8/26/13
10/1/13
10/1/13
#15
Utilize 2012-2013 marathon data and final data
review to identify list of at-risk students
Semanko
8/26/13
10/1/13
#16
#17
Teachers review list of at-risk students
Identify Students that will be targeted during tier II
remediation/interventions/enrichment are identified
Enhancement and TAs are assigned to specific grade
levels for extra support during the
remediation/enrichment block
District differentiation and intervention specialist
Semanko
Semanko
Universal CFA in each grade
Marathon Data and list of
students for enrichment
black
Marathon Data and list of
students for remediation
block
Revised at-risk list
List of at-risk students
8/26/13
8/26/13
10/1/13
10/1/13
Hinson
Pirate Time plan
6/11/13
8/25/13
Hinson
Completed schedule
8/25/13
6/11/14
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#18
#19
Page 13
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
#20
#21
#22
#23
#24
#25
#26
#27
#28
#29
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
works with enrichment block teachers through ERD
support and goal teams.
Referesher Training on tiered paperwork to be used
RtI coordinator
Agenda from training
with at risk students.
Begin tiered paperwork for all students receiving tier Blevins/Reavis
Tiered Tracking Sheet
II remediation or intervention and need progress
monitoring.
Implement tier II intervention and enrichment block
Hinson
Fidelity Data
following the established blueprint.
Implement fidelity tool for intervention and
Hinson
Fidelity Data
enrichment block.
Probe remediation group and record results on line
Blevins/Reavis
Assessment results
graph, attached to tiered paperwork
Maintain and update tiered paperwork for
Reavis/Blevins
Tiered Tracking Sheet
remediation students
Administer/Analyze AIMS WEB/Reading 3D
Hinson
AIMS WEB results/report
Screening benchmarks
Administer CA (EOG at EOY) according to school
Hinson/Semanko/ Marathon Data
testing schedule
Regrut
Analyze CA data to determine strength of core and
Blevins/Reavis
% of students at each tier
students identified in each tier beginning, middle, and
data
end of year.
Analyze data and determine next steps
Blevins/Reavis
Data questions
Page 14
8/26/13
10/1/13
8/26/13
10/1/13
8/26/13
10/1/13
8/26/13
10/1/13
8/26/13
6/11/14
8/26/13
6/11/13
8/26/13
6/11/13
5/1/14
6/1/14
8/26/13
6/11/14
8/26/13
6/11/14
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
What resources/budget needs do you have for the first cycle?
-purchase intervention/enrichment program-Reading Mastery
-materials for FCRR interventions to increase fluency
If you identified budget needs, what budget code will you use to meet the budget needs for this cycle?
-instructional money
-I3 Grant
If funding is not available, identify the steps from the implementation plan that will address the funding gap.
-PTO support, community/partnership support
What professional development, if any, will be offered in cycle 1 to support the staff in implementing the approach?
-Reading Foundations To Select Teachers
-AIMS web Refresher
-Reading 3D Refresher
-Balanced Literacy Continued
-Common Core ERD Support and PLC Support
Page 15
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
List the information or measures the team
will use to determine if the approach was
implemented/completed? (Completion
Data)
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
B. List the information or measures the team will use
to determine if the approach wasn’t implemented
correctly? (Fidelity of implementation.)
C. List the information or measures the team
will use to determine what worked and what
didn’t work? (Impact data)
CA, EOG Data, AIMS web Data
Fidelity tool for intervention/enrichment block
Progress Monitoring Tool
Tiered Paperwork
S
Study – Analysis of data after implementing an approach
At the end of cycle 1, answer the following questions based on the data collected from the identified measures in boxes A, B, and C above:
1. What worked and how do you
2. What didn’t work and how do you
3. Do you need any additional assistance as you look at your
know?
know?
results and start planning for Cycle 2? ___Yes _x__No
Reflect on the answers in box 1 and 2 above for cycle 1 and check which option best describes what you will do in your plan for cycle 2 (double click the
box and select “check” to check the box)?
Target goal has been met and is changed to a new target goal.
Target goal not met so we will continue current plan. We will make
Target goal not met but current plan is effective so we will
improvements to the plan based on what didn’t work as identified in #2 above.
continue current plan and repeat it for the next cycle.
Target goal not met and information indicates that we need to abandon the current
plan and identify a new approach.
A
Act – Revise or continue with implementation plan based on data analysis.
4. What is your next step for cycle 2 (Identify key approach or strategy
Step
#
Cycle 2 List the specific steps your team will
complete during the second cycle.
Person(s) responsible for
completion of the step.
Measure/Indicator
(How will you know if the
step is completed correctly?)
Start Date
End Date
#1
Page 16
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
7a.
7b.
7c.
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#15
#16
#17
#18
#19
#20
Page 17
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
What resources/budget needs do you have for cycle 2
If you identified budget needs, what budget code will you use to meet the budget needs for this cycle?
If funding is not available, list the steps from the implementation plan that will address the funding gap.
What professional development, if any, will be offered in cycle 2 to support the staff in implementing the approach?,
Determine the measures/data that will be used to determine the effectiveness of the Cycle 2 approach by answering the following questions
A. List the information or measures the
team will use to determine if the approach
was implemented/completed? (Completion
Data)
S
B. List the information or measures the team will
use to determine if the approach wasn’t
implemented correctly? (Fidelity of
implementation.)
C. List the information or measures the team
will use to determine what worked and what
didn’t work? (Impact Data)
Study – Analysis of data after implementing an approach
At the end of cycle 2, answer the following questions based on the data collected from the identified measures in boxes A, B, and C above:
3. What worked and how do you know?
4. What didn’t work and how do you know? 3. Do you need any additional assistance as you
look at your results and start planning for Cycle
2?
Reflect on the data analysis for the year so far and check the option below that best describes your direction for the 2012-13 SIP?
A
Act – Continue with the Target Goal or revise the Target Goal for next year.
Overall goal has been met and School Improvement Plan focus will change for next year.
Or…
Target goal has been met and is changed to a new target goal.
Target goal not met but current plan is effective so we will continue current plan and repeat it for the 2013-14 SIP to take our work to sustaining..
Page 18
Revised 8-4-09
Iredell-Statesville Schools
H-2
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
.Target goal not met, so we will continue current plan for 2013-14. We will make improvements to the plan based on what didn’t work through this
year.
Begin planning your 2014-2015 SIP on a new template. Your DRAFT plan is due on _______.
Page 19
Revised 8-4-09