Faculty Responses
Informed of LAC purposes
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral/Don't know
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency of teaching in LAC
Frequency
66
Percent
35.5
Frequency
79
Percent
42.7
96
51.6
Occasionally teach
44
23.8
7
3.8
Never have taught but
would like to
25
13.5
12
6.5
Never have taught and
am not interested in
doing do
35
18.9
5
2.7
Don't know if I've taught
in the LAC
2
1.1
186
100.0
185
100.0
LAC should be important part of undergraduate
education at UNI
Frequency
129
Percent
69.4
Agree
41
22.0
Neutral/Don't know
10
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
Total
LAC content at UNI needs to be revisited and
changed
Percent
38.7
Agree
44
23.7
5.4
Neutral/Don't know
45
24.2
4
2.2
Disagree
17
9.1
2
1.1
Strongly disagree
8
4.3
186
100.0
186
100.0
Frequency
78
Percent
42.2
Confident
77
41.6
Not at all confident
30
16.2
185
100.0
Total
Total
Frequency
72
Confidence in understanding LAC purposes
Very confident
Regularly teach
Strongly agree
Total
Faculty Responses
Current management structure needs to be
revisited and changed
Length of LAC
Too long
Frequency
68
Percent
37.8
102
56.7
10
5.6
180
100.0
Just about right
Too short
Total
System
6
Total
Frequency
55
Percent
29.7
Agree
41
22.2
Neutral/Don't know
76
41.1
Disagree
11
5.9
2
1.1
185
100.0
Strongly agree
Strongly disagree
186
Total
Status
College
Frequency
130
Percent
70.7
CBA
Frequency
12
Percent
6.5
Tenure track
30
16.3
COE
32
17.4
Term
11
6.0
CHFA
51
27.7
Temporary full time
5
2.7
CNS
36
19.6
Temporary part time
8
4.3
CSBS
48
26.1
184
100.0
Other
5
2.7
Total
184
100.0
Tenured
Total