New
Mexico
Bureau
of
Mines
and Mineral
Resources
Open-file Report 132
DRILL
HOLE AND TESTING DATA
COMPILED FOR
HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDY OF ANIMAS VALLEY,
HIDALGO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
Keith M. O'Brien
Hydrologist
and
William J. Stone
Hydrogeologist
March 1982
CONTENTS
Page
Introduction
Problem and purpose of
Purpose of this report
The Animas Valley
Sources of Data
1
1
1
3
4
study
Stratigraphic Data
Cuttings and Geophysical Logs
Spatial Correlation of Subsurface
Deposits
6
6
10
Petrographic Data
Texture of Units
Lithology of.Units
17
Aquifer
18
Test
Data
References Cited
Figure 1 Location of Study Area
2 Location of Cross-section A-A'
3 Location of Petroleum Wells
4 Summary of Mechanical Analyses
Appendix A
B
C
D
E
14
14
20
2
11
12
15
Description of Cuttings From T-1 and T-2 25
Drillers Logs of Wells in Animas Valley
34
Petroleum Logsof Wells in Animas Valley
66
Particle Size Analyses
72
(in pocket)
Geophysical Bore-hole Logs From
T-1 and T-2
Plate 1 Cross-section A-A'
(in
pocket)
INTRODUCTION
The
Animas
Valley
is a closed
basin
located
Hidalgo County, southwest New Mexico (fig.
1).
approximately
80
mi
long,
lying
between
in
western
The valley is
the
Mexican
border
and
to 12 mi
US highway 70. The width of the valley varies 6from
along
its
Problem
length.
and
The
purpose
central
of
part
study
of
the
valley
is
an
important
area
for
irrigated agriculture (Lansford and others, 1980) and is the
site
the
Lightning
Dock
Known
Geothermal
Resource
Area
(fig.
Although an understanding of the hydrogeology
of the valley
1).
is
of
important
of the
area's
to
both
the
geothermal
agricultural
resources,
economy
the
water
and
the
resources
development
of
the
entire area had not been studied in detail since 1957 (Reeder,
1957).
The Animas Valley is also an excellent examplea closed
of
alluvial basin. For these reasons the present study was initiated
as
partof the U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resource Division's
Southwest Alluvial Basin Regional Aquifer System Analysis. The
work is being funded under contract with the U.S. Geological Survey
(WRD)
,
Albuquerque.
Purpose of this
Basic
released
data
report
compiled
ina series
information
compiled
of
for
Bureau
may
be
the
Animas
Open-file
available
Valley
study
reports
so that
for
use
are
being
the
prior
to
completion of the final project report. This report (OF-132)
the
e.
."
*--7-"l
2
r""""""
I
I
~
I
I
i
I
j
I
I
I
!
ji
I
I
.:*io:
Figure 1
Location of S t u d y Area
3
gives the drill hole and testing data. Bureau OF-130 gives the
basic
water-level
data,
OF-133
the
final
The
Animas
The
data,
will
give
OF-131
the
gives
the
hydrologic
basic
model,
water-quality
and
OF-134
will
be
report the
on project.
Valley
Animas
Valley
lies
in
the
Mexican
Highlands
section
of
the Basin and Range physiographic province.
It is bounded on
the
west
by
the
Peloncillo
Mountains
and
1).
Mountains and the Pyramid Mountains (fig.
boundary is marked
of US 70.
byan extensive
eolian
on
the
east
by
the
The northern
dune
field
just
south
The southern boundary lies across the international
boundary in Mexico.
The climate
of
the
Animas
Valley
is
arid
to
semiarid
(Cox,
1973). Precipitation generally averages 10 inches in the valley
of data
and 22 inches in the higher mountains. Based on 30 years
5.71 inches
(1931-1960), precipitation at Lordsburg falls below
and exceeds 13.84 inches one year in ten. Rainfall is greatest
in
late
summer
and
early
fall; ofhalf
the
average
annual
precipitation occurs in July through September. Animas Creek,
which
risesin
northerly
the
southern
toa point
just
Peloncillo
south
of
Mountains
the
town
of
and
flows
Animas,
is the
only
perennial stream in the study area. Alluvial fans along the west
and
east
The
valley
margins
Peloncillo
are
Mountains
sources
consist
of
of
ephemeral
various
flow.
sedimentary
and
volcanic rocks. Approximately 5,000 ft of Paleozoic strata,
approximately 2,500
ft of Cretaceous strata, and an undetermined
4
thickness
area
of
north
Cretaceous
of
the
and
ghost
Tertiary
town
of
volcanic
Steins
rocks
and
occur
in
south
Pass
of
the
Cowboy
.
(Gillerman, 1958)
The
These
Animas
include
Mountains
consist
approximately
3,500
mainly
of
ft
Paleozoic
of
sedimentary
rocks.
limestone,
dolostone, sandstone,cand shale and 10,000-15,000
ft of Cretaceous
sandstone and shale (Soule, 197.2).
The
Pyramid
Mountains
consist a of
variety
of
volcanic
and
plutonic igneous rocks (Flege, 1959). The northern part consists
of basalt intruded by granodiorite. The central part is
characterized
by
pyroclastic
volcanics
and
lesser
amounts
of
rhyolite, rhyolitic welded tuff, and basalt. The southern part
is dominated by andesite with lesser amounts of rhyolite and basalt
of two Quaternary lakes: Lake
The valley was the site
Cloverdale in the south (Schwennesen, 1918) and Lake Animas in t
north (Fleischhauer and Stone, 1981). The valley is filled with
bolson
and
lacustrine
Geologic
maps
deposits
of undetermined
and
geophysical
surveys
thickness.
confirm
the
basin-and-
is a graben and the
range structure of the area. The valley
bounding ranges are horsts. Complex folding and faulting is
apparent
within
the
intervening
basin
Sources
data
of
Lithologic
mountain
as
data
blocks
and
presumably
occurs
in
the
well.
used
in
this
report
were
either
generated
as
part of the project, or compiled from published sources,
the files
of
the
Deming
office
of
the
New
Mexico
State
Engineer,
or
the
5
petroleum
library at the
New
MexicoBureau of Mines and Mineral
Resources.
Published sources include Schwennesen(1918), Reeder (1957),
Kottlowski and others (1969), Thompson and others (1978), Deal
and others (1978), Elston and others (1979), and Thompson (1981).
6
STRATIGRAPHIC
Subsurface
compiled
data
from
either
existing
DATA
collected
sources
as
were
part
utilized
of
to
the
project
define
or
stratigrap
relakionships in the Animas Valley. The New Mexico Bureau of
Mines
and
Mineral
Resources
drilling
crew
completed
two
drill
6. The holes were sampled 5
atfoot
holes in T22S, RZOW, section
intervals
and
logged
by
the
geophysical of
group
theU.S.
Geophysical Survey, Albuquerque. Numerous well logs submitted by
water
well
well
as
logs
from
drillers
petroleum
the
to
well
the
State
logs,
petroleum
Engineers
cuttings
library
at
and
the
office
in
geophysical
New
Deming,
as
borehole
Mexico
Bureau
of Mines
and Mineral Resources were analyzed.
A geologic cross-section
based on
these
Cuttings
and
well
Geophysical
Description
Mexico
A.
Bureau
logs
of
of
was
1).
(Plate
Logs
cuttings
Mines
constructed
and
from
the
Mineral
holes
drilled
Resources
is
by
given
the
in
New
Append
The description of cuttings includes type, grain composikion,
color, particle size, roundness, sorting, cementation and accessory
minerals. The samples from the holes drilled by the rotary drill
B) in
rig were compared with borehole geophysical logs (Appendix
order
to
determine
tops
of
lithologic
units.
Samples from test hole
1 (T-1) and test hole 2 (T-2) reflect
the
type
of
deposition
which
occurs
in
topographically
closed
1). Test hole 1,
basins of the Basin and Range province (figure
located in T22S, R20W, section
6 , SW%, NE%, NE% was drilled and
was
sampled from0 to 415 feet. The air rotary drilling method
7
used
for
the
first
80 feet,.after
which
drilling
mud
was
added.
The sampling interval was
5 feet. Description of the samples is
given
in
The
foot
A.
Appendix
initial60 feet
intervals
of
drilling T-1
in encountered 5 to 10
of
sediments
ranging
from
silt
to
coarse
sand.
Samples for the next
65 feet (60 to 125 ft) are predominantly clay.
Water-bearing sediments present in the next 95 feet (125 to 220
ft) consist ofa 35 foot interval of sand and gravel,
a 40 foot
interval
of
very
fine
sand a and
20 foot
interval
of
sand
and
gravel. Pebbly clays are found from 220 to 240 feet. The 175
foot
interval
from
Geophysical
240
bore-hole
diameter
fluctuations
Attempts
to
fill
415
logs
feet
for
consists
test 1hole
are
of
silty
difficult
clay.
to
The caliper log shows extreme bore-hole
interpret (Appendix B).
Spontaneous
to
from
the
the
drill
bit
borelr.hole.wibh
potential
and
resistivity
size
5 1/8ofinches.
water
logs
were
began
unsuccessful.
recording
at
the
raised groundwater level of 134 feet. The drill hole, which was
to 191 feet. Bore-hole diameter
initially 415 feet deep, collapsed
fluctuations
between
134
to
191
feet
caused
problems
with
the
interpretation of these logs. The gamma, bulk density and neutron
logs
are
also
affected
by
large
bore-hole
diameter
fluctuations,
but not by bore-hole dewatering. Sand and clay layers are
discernable
on
the
neutron
log
0 to 53 feet, and silty clay
between
is found from 53 to 130 feet. Sand and gravel with layers of
fine
sand
are
present
on
the
neutron
log
between
144
to
191
Detritas fronl volcanic source rocks cause .sands to have
l o g shows the presence
higher radioactivity than clays. The gamma
fe
of sand andsilt
between0 to 60 feet,
of
clay
with
some
sand
feet,a washed out zone between 125140
tofeet
between 60 to 125
and
silty
predominantly
sand
and
gravel awith
few 2 to 4 foot'intervals
140 to 191 feet.
between
silt
Test
T-1 in
hole2 (T-2) is located 50 feet east of
T22S,
R20W, section6, SW%, NE%, NE%. Samples were collected between
50 to 55 feet and at
5 foot intervals from
80 to 363 feet. The
total depth ofT-2 was 363 feet. Samples between0 to 80 feet
are assumed to be analogous to samples collected from T-1. Test
hole 2 was
drilled
with
drilling
mud
from
the
land
surface
to
th
total depth. Since drilling mud was not used in T-1 for the initi
80 feet, samples
from
T-1
in that interval are. not intermixed with
drilling'mud. Description of the samples is given in Appendix
A.
A sample
feet of T-1,
of
gravel,
was
taken
which
at
was
not
present
in
the80 initial
5
the
foot interval between 50 to 55
feet. From 80 to 135 feet, sediments ranging from fine gravel to
silt are present. A 5 foot interval of very coarse to fine sand
to silt are
exists between 135to 140 feet. Gravel to fine sand
found in the 30 foot interval from140 to 170 feet. Sand, ranging
from very coarse to fine,
is present between 170 to 215 feet. A
10 foot
layer
of
very
fine
sand
and
silt
exists
from
215
to
225
feet. Medium sand along with fine to very fine sand is found from
363 feet, clay is predominant in the
225 to 255 feet. From 225 to
samples.
Geophysical
bore-hole
logs
for
tops of lithologic changes (AppendixB).
test 2hole
aid
in
determining
The caliper log for T-2
68 feet,
is relatively consistent except for the initial
which
are
9
washed out. Spontaneous potential and resistivity logs are
available
from
the
land
surface
since
the
bore-hole
was
successfully filled with water. Caving
of the bore hole filled
the
7 3 feet.
hole 2to
drill
Geophysical
logs
show
alternating
layers
of
sand
and
silt
in
the initial46 feet. An 18 foot zone rich in gravel and sand.exists
between 46 to 64 feet. From 6 4 to 130 feet, there isa 66 foot
interval of fine gravel to silt. Very coarse sand is indicated
for 10 feet between1 3 0 to 140 feet. Alternating layers of sand
1 4 0 to 1 5 6 feet.
and silt are shown between
A clean 1 5 foot
of medium sand exists between
1 5 6 to 171 feet. From171
zone
to2 0 1
feet, very fine sand to silt is encountered. Very fine sand to
clay is present between 201to 2 2 0 feet. Medium to fine sand is
found between 220 to 2 5 0 feet. Clay and silt are indicated for
the
remainder
Comparison
of
of
the
log
250 to 2 7 3 feet).
(between
geophysical
bore-hole
logs
with
cuttings
indicate a lag time for cuttings to reach the land surface. Coarse
foot interval between
1 3 5 to
sand appears in cuttings for 5 the
140 feet. Geophysical logs indicate coarse sand from
130 to 140
feet.
In general, a 5 foot lag time exists for cuttings to reach
the land
surface.
Another
is
that
observation
cuttings
from
in
comparing
one
horizon
the
tend
two
to
subsurface
be
mixed
methods
with
from another horizon. For example, cuttings show
a mixture of
gravel, sand and silt between 3the
0 foot interval from
1 4 0 to
1 7 0 feet,
whereas
geophysical
logs
indicate
a medium
1 5 6 to 171 feet.
the 30 foot interval from
sand
within
cuttin
The
temperature
log
for
of 1.4OC per 100 feet (2.6'F
T-2
yields
a temperature
gradient
per 100.feet). The minimum
was encountered ata depth of 64
temperature of 16.6OC(61.8'F)
feet. The maximum temperature of 19.6"C (67.2OF) was indicated
at 272 feet (Appendix
B).
Spatial
An
Correlation
attempt
was
of
Subsurface
made
to
Deposits
understand
the
spatial
correlation
o
sediments in the subsurface.A northwest-southeast lineof section
A-A' was constructed down the center
of the Animas Valley (figure
2).
Well logs reported by water well drillers were compiled from
the
State
Engineer's
exploration
were
office
collected
in
from
Deming,
the
and
New
well
Mexico
logs
from
Bureau
petrole
of
Mines
Mineral Resources. Representative water well logs were chosen
on
the basisof distribution and depth. They are given
in Appendix
C.
Location of water well logs used in cross section A-A' is shown
on figure2.
Description of samples from petroleum wells is given
in AppendixD.
Location of petroleum wells is shown in figure
3.
Wells
to
to
closest
the
line
of
the
line
section
of
section
and in
used
the
were
orthogonally
projected
constructionof cross-section
A-A' (plate 1).
The
description
of
samples
from
wells
is
simplified
into
fou
categories. Descriptions of sand, sand and gravel, and gravel are
grouped together asa single unit. Sand, silt, gravel and clay;
gravelly clay; and conglomerate form another unit. The third unit
is comprised of sandy clay and clay. Rhyolite, limestone and
andesite are grouped to form the fourth unit. The distribution of
these
A-A'
.
units
in
the
subsurface
is
shown
cross-section
on1 in
plate
I
I
I
i
!
I
i
I
I
1
I
Ij
!
!
I
!
i
I
I
j
!
Figure 2
Location of wells used in geologic
cross-section
A-d.
L
.
'
.
2
Figure 3
Location of petroleum wells for which subsurface
data were available.
IJ
Inspection of cross section A-A' shows an absence of spatial
correlation of sediments in the subsurface. Schwennesen (1918)
noted the lack of sediment correlation between wells. Anastomosing
deposition
of
sediments
creates
a wedge-shaped
cross-sectional
view of different types of deposits. Hence, units present in one
well
pinch
other
out
wells
Clay
at
in
short
the
layers,
distances
from
the
well
and
do
not
appe
proximity.
which
were
hoped
to
be
easily
correlated,
are
present in practically all of the well logs. However, the tops of
the
clay
horizons
in
one
well
can
not
be
correlated
with
the
to
of clay horizons in other wells.
It was thought that lakes
throughout
surfaces
the
that
geologic
could
be
past
would
correlated
create
over
large
large
stable
distances
sedimentatio
through
the
inspection of subsurface data. Subsurface data indicate the existence
of several lakes during the geologic past, but determining the
horizontal
extent
of
these
lakes
by
correlating of'clay
tops horizons
is not possible. The discontinuous deposition of clay at different
elevations
exhibits
in
both
the
subsurface
confined
and
creates
a water-bearing
unconfined
system
conditions.
that
PETROGRAPHIC
A total of seven
T-2 were
chosen
to
samples
DATA
from
investigate
the
the
well
cuttings
T-1 and
of
textural
and
lithologic
characteristics of sediments from the lower Animas Valley. The
5 foot
intervals analyzed were from
210 to 215 feet and 2 1 5 to 220
feet inT-1,
and from 135 to 140 feet, 1 5 0 to 155 feet, 1 7 0 to
1 7 5 feet, 180 to 185 feet
Texture
of
The
and2 0 5 to 210 feet inT-2.
Units
seven
samples
were
sieved8 inch
in
diameterU.S.
Standard
sieves. If samples, which weighed between.209.4
g and 7 1 . 3 g,
contained any gravel
( > 2 . 0 mm), they were initially sieved by
hand through d -l@ ( 2
screen. The remainder of each sample
mm)
was sieved through5 sieves. The mesh sizes of the
5 sieves were
,
04 (1.0 mm)
1@ ( 0 . 5
sample
percentage
,
2 @( 0 . 2 5
mm),
3@ ( 0 . 1 2 5 mm), and 4@
The sieve stack was placeda in
Rotap for 15 minutes.
( 0 . 0 6 2 5 mm).
The
mm)
retained
on each
of
the
total
of
the
sample
sieves
weight
was
weighed,
calculated
as
and
the
shown
in
Appendix D.
The
resultsof the
figure 4.
If
weight
percentage
differencesin sorting
Grain
the
analysis
are
summarized
in
This plot of grain size on the logarithmic scale versus
cumulative
the
mechanical
size
and
on
grain
of
a sample is determined
curve
is
on the
found
the
right
by
arithmetic
size
of
its
side
of the
the
scale
illustrates
seven
samples.
position
on the
graph.
graph,it indicates
the predominance of large grain sizes. Conversely, curves found
on
the
left
side
indicate
the
predominance
of
small
grain
sizes.
16
Sorting is shown by the steepness of the curve. Curves with
steep
slopes
slopes
indicate
indicate
poor
good
sorting,
whereas
curves
with
gentle
sorting.
Figure 4 shows two separate groups of curves. Curves for
samples 3 , 4 and 5 have smaller grain sizes and slightly poorer
sorting than the curves for samples
1, 2, 6 and 7.
and 5 have a median
grain
size
in
the
Curves 3 , 4
range
fine
(.19sand
mm).
of
Curves 1, 2, 6 and 7 have a median grain size in the range of
coarse sand (.88
mm).
Curves 1, 2 and 7 have steeper slopes and
therefore better sor$ing than3 , 4 , 5 and 6.
weight-percentage
column
in
Inspection of the
D points
Appendix
out
that
the
grain
size distribution is fairly equal for curves
3 , 4 and 5 whereas
curves 1, 2, 6 and 7 have a more restricted grain-size
distribution. Furthermore, the cumulative percent column
in
Appendix .D shows that for curves
3 , 4 and 5, only 6 5 % of the total
weight of the
samples
are
greater
than
the
fine
sand
fraction,
1, 2, 6 and 7, 95% of the total weight of the
while for curves
samples
The
the
greater
shape
of
majorityof the
The
in
are
texture
determining
the
the
grains
grains
of
the
than
fine
sand
varies
being
fraction.
from
angular
sub-angular
non-indurated
water-bearing
sediments
to
rounded
to
sub-rounded.
is
an
important
wit
factor
characteristics
of a deposit.
Ideally, a rounded, well-sorted, large-grained sediment would
provide a desirable water-bearing deposit. However, such
deposits
are
difficult
to
locate
and
are
not
present
in
many
geologic environments. The samples chosen for mechanical analysis
in
this
study
are
representative
of
the
range
of
sediments
that
may serve a s w a t e r - b e a r i n g d e p o s i t s
i n t h e l o w e r Animas V a l l e y .
The r a n g e of water-bearing sediments encountered
1 and 2 i n c l u d e s a n d a n d g r a v e l ,
f i n e gravel t o f i n e s a n d , v e r y
coarse to very fine sand, predominantly
t o silt.
i n test h o l e s
medium s a n d , . a n d f i n e s a n d
F i g u r e 4 summarizes t h er e s u l t so ft h em e c h a n i c a l
analyses and indicates
b e a r i n gd e p o s i t .
whichsamplesapproach
the ideal water-
None o ft h es a m p l e sa r ew e l l - s o r t e do r
rounded,butcurves
well-
1, 2 and 7 are b e t t e r y s o r t e d a n d p o s s e s s l a r g e r
grainsizesthantheothercurvesinfigure
4.
Hence, i n t h e
development of a water supply, one should seek out these zones of
predominantly sand and gravel.
L i t h o l o g y of U n i t s
The m a j o r r o c k t y p e r e c o g n i z e d i n t h e c u t t i n g s f r o m
T-2 is v o l c a n i cr o c k .
The NorthernPyramidMountains,
T - 1 and
as well
as t h e P e l o n c i l l o Mountains consist primarily of Cretaceous and
Tertiary volcanic flows
test holes.
and p y r o c l a s t i c s i n t h e v i c i n i t y
The v o l c a n i cr o c k sp r e s e n t
of t h e
i n t h e samplesfrom
the
AQUIFER TEST DATA
The d r i l l i n g p h a s e of t h e p r o j e c t
w a s designed t o complete
Animas Valley.Observation
t h r e e 1 0 0 0 f o o th o l e sa c r o s st h el o w e r
wells, which would have been placed near the
1000 f o o t h o l e s ,
i n a q u i f e r tests t o d e t e r m i n e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e
would have been used
values €or t h e t r a n s m i s s i v i t y and s t o r a g e c o e f f i c i e n t s o f t h e l o w e r
Animas Valleyaquifersystem.
However, d r i l l i n g problems c r e a t e d
of t h e s i d e w a l l o f t h e d r i l l h o l e s c a u s e d
by continuous caving
termination of the drilling phase.
Test h o l e 2 w a s reamed w i t h a 6% i n c h d r i l l b i t ,
PVC c a s i n g p e r f o r a t e d
and 4 i n c h
from 120 t o 280 f e e t was set i n t h e h o l e .
The p e r f o r a t i o n scheme from 1 2 0 t o 280 feet was t o a l t e r n a t e 20
foot sections
ofperforated
PVC w i t h 2 0 f o o t s e c t i o n s
The s p i r a l s were s e p a r a t e d
i n c h (3.175 mm) hand d r i l l e dh o l e s .
by a d i s t a n c e o f
1 2 i n c h e s , and i n d i v i d u a l l / 8
were s e p a r a t e d by a d i s t a n c e o f
The f e a s i b i l i t y o f
2 inches.
well was t e s t e d by pumping T-2 w i t h a
2 i n c hd i a m e t e rs u b m e r s i b l e
pump.
The pumping c a p a c i t y o f t h e
submersible pump was 5 g a l l o n sp e rm i n u t e .A f t e r
10.5 m i n u t e s , t h e r e
w a s no observable
Since a l a r g e rc a p a c i t y
casing, a s u i t a b l e a q u i fer
pumping f o r
drawdown i n t h e o b s e r v a t i o n
pump would n o t f i t i n t o a 4 i n c h
stress c o u l d n o t b e e c o n o m i c a l l y
a p p l i e d ,a n dt h ea q u i f e rt e s t i n g
to locate existing
inch drill holes
a pump test u s i n g T-2 as t h e pumping well
and T-1 as t h e o b s e r v a t i o n
well.
of s p i r a l i n g 1/8
The p e r f o r a t i o n sc o n s i s t e d
u n p e r f o r a t e d PVC.
of
program was c a n c e l l e d .A t t e m p t s
wells w i t h l a r g e c a p a c i t y
pumps i n the lower
19
Animas V a l l e y ( n o r t h
of I n t e r s t a t e 1 0 ) for the purpose of aquifer
t e s t i n g were unsuccessful.
20
REFERENCES
Armstrong, A X . ,
Silberman, M.L;, Todd, V.R.,
and Carter, R.B.,
1978,
Hoggatt, W.C.,
Geology of central P e l o n c i l l o
Mountains, HidalgoCounty,
New Mexico:
N e w Mexico Bureau
of Mines and Mineral Resources, C i r c . 158, 1 9 p . ,
4 figs.,
Cox, D . N . ,
2 tables,
1 map, s c a l e 1 : 2 4 , 0 0 0
N e w Mexico:
1973, S o i l Survey of HidalgoCounty,
U.S.
Dept. of A g r i c u l t u r e , S o i l C o n s e r v a t i o n S e r v i c e a n d F o r e s t
S e r v i c e , i n c o o p e r a t i o n w i t h N e w Mexico A g r i c u l t u r a l E x p e r i m e n t
..
Station, 90 p.
Davis, S . N . ,
and DeVJiest, R . J . ,
1 9 6 6 , Hydrogeology:
John Wi1F.y and Sons, I n c . ,
Deal, E.G.,
E l s t o n , W.E.,
Damon, P.E.,
a n dS h a f i q u l l a h ,
Guidebook29th
Peterson, S.L.., Reiter, D . E . ,
M.,
volcanic
N e w Mexico G e o l o g i c a lS o c i e t y
FieldConference,p.
219-229
1 9 6 0 , Reconnaissanceofgroundwater,inPlayasValley,
HidalgoCounty,
TechnicalReport
New Mexico:
New Mexico S t a t e Engineer
15, 4 0 p.
D r e w e s , H.,and Thorman, C . H . ,
,1980,Geologic
Quadrangle and t h e A d j a c e n t P a r t
HidalgoCounty,
New Mexico:
M i s c e l l a n e o u sI n v e s t i g a t i o n s
D r e w e s , H.,
1978,Cenozoic
Range province in Hidalgo County,
s o u t h w e s t e r n N e w Mexico:
Doty, G.C.,
4 6 3 p.
Erb, E . E . ,
geology of the Basin and
New York,
and Thorman, C . H . ,
Map of t h e S t e i n s
of t h e Vanar Q u a d r a n g l e ,
U.S. GeologicalSurvey
Map 1-1220, 1 : 2 4 , 0 0 0
1980,Geologic
Map of t h e C o t t o n
City Quadrangle
and t h e A d j a c e n t P a r t of t h e Vanar Quadrangle,
HidalgoCounty,
N e w Mexico:
U.S.
GeologicalSurveyMiscellaneous
e
e
21
Investigations Map 1-1221, 1:24,000
Elston, W.E.,
and Erb, E.E.,
1979, Tertiary geology
of Hidalgo
County, New Mexico: New Mexico Geology,
v. 1, no. 1,
p. 1-6
Flege, R.F.,
1959, Geology of Lordsburg Quadrangle, Hidalgo
County, New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral
Resources, Bull. 62, 3 6 p.,
2 tables, 2 figs., 10 pls.
Fleischhauer, H.L., Jr., 1976, Stratigraphy and sedimentologyof
lacustrine
shoreline
features
in
Hidalgo County, New Mexicotabs.):
.
the
Lower
Animas
Valley,
Journal of the Arizona
Academy of Science,v. 11, p. 94
Fleischhauer, H.L., Jr., 1977a, Soil-age relationships
of alluvial
and lacustrine deposits, Lower Animas Valley, southwest New
Mexico (abs.): Geological Society of Arnerica, Abstracts
with Programs,v. 9, p. 18-19
Fleischhauer, H.L., Jr., 1977b, Quaternary geology
of Lake
Animas,
Hidalgo County, New Mexico: <M.S. thesis, New Xexico
Tech,
149 p.
Fleischhauer, H.L., Jr., 1978, Summary
of the Late Quaternary
geology of Lake Animas, Hidalgo County, New Mexico: New
Mexico Geological Society, Guidebook 29th field conference,
p. 283-284
Fleischhauer, H.L., Jr., and Stone, W.J., 1981, Quaternary geology
o f Lake
Animas, Hidalgo County, New Mexico: New Mexico
Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Circular 174 (in press)
Gillerman, E.,
Hidalgo
1958, Geology of the Central Peloncillo Mountains,
County;
New
Mexico,
and
Cochise
County,
Arizona:
New Mexico
Bureauof Mines
and
Mineral
Resources,
Bull.
57,
152 p., 2 tables, 1 fig., 14 p l s .
Hawkins, D.B., 1981, Geohydrology of the Lower Animas Valley,
Hidalgo County, New Mexico: A computer simulation study,
New Mexico
Institute
of
Mining
and
Technology,
Masters
Thesis, 105 p.
Kintzinger, P.R., 1956, Geothermal survey of hot ground near
Lordsburg, New Mexico: Science, v. 124, p. 629
-Kottlowski,F.E., Foster, R.W., and Wengerd, S.A., 1969, Key oil
tests
and
stratigraphic
sections
in
southwestern
New
Mexico:
New Mexico Geol. SOC. Guidebook, 20th Field Conf.,
p. 186196
Lansford, R.R., and Sorenson, E.F., Gollehon,N.R., Fisburn, M.,
Loslebon, L., Creel, B.J., West, F.G., 1980, Sources of
irrigation
water
and
irrigated
and
dry
cropland
acreages
in
New Mexico, by county, 1974-1979: New Mexico Agricultural
39 p.
Experiement Station, Research Report 122,
Maker, H.J., Cox, D.N., and Anderson, J.U., 1970, Soil Associations
and Land classification for irrigation, Hidalgo County, New
Mexico: New Mexico Agricultural Experiment'Station, Research
Report 177, 28 p.
Reeder, H.O.,
1957, Ground Water in Animas Valley, Hidalgo County,
11,
New Mexico: New Mexico State Engineer Technical Report
101 p., 6 tables, 39 figs., pls.
4
Schwennesen, A.T., 1918, Ground Water in the Animas,
Playas,
Hachita, and San Luis Basins, New Mexico:
U.S.
Geological
Survey, Water-Supply Paper 4 2 2 , 152 p., 3 tables, 17 figs.,
9 pls.
23
Smith, C., 1978, Geophysics, Geology and Geothermal Leasing
Status of the Lightning
New Mexico
Geological
DockKGRA, Animas
Society,
Valley,
New
Mexico:
Guidebook
29th field
conference, p . 343-348, 1 table, 10 figs.
Soule, J.M., 1972, Structural geologyof Northern Part ofAnimas
Mountains, Hidalgo County, New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau
of
Mines and Mineral Resources, Circ. 125,p.,158 figs.
Stone, W . J . ,
Mexico
and Mizell, N.H.,1977, Geotherlual resources of New
-
a survey of work to date: New Mexico Bureau of
73, 117 p.
.Minesand Mineral Resources, Open-file Report
Stone, W.J.,
Mizell, N.H., and Hawley,J.W., 1979, Availability of
geological
U.S.
and
Geological
geophysical
Survey's
data
for
Southwestern
the
eastern ofhalf
the
Alluvial
Basins
Regional
Aquifer Study: New Mexico Bureau
of Mines and Mineral
Resources, Open-file Report
109, 80 p.
Summers, W.K.,
Mexico
1976, Catalog of thermal waters in New Mexico: New
Bureau of Mines
and
Mineral
Resources,
Hydrologic
Rept. 4, 80 p.
Thompson, Sam,111, 1981, Analyses of petroleum source and reservoir
rocks in southwestern New Mexico: New Mexico Energy Research
and Development 'Institute,
120 p.
Thompson, Sam, 111,
Tovar R., J . C . ,
and Conley, J.N.,
1978, O i l
and gas exploration wells in the Pedregosa Basin: New Mexico
Geological Society, Guidebook 29th field conference,
p - 33134 2
Thorman, C.H., and Drewes, H.,1978, Geologic Map of the Gary and
U.S.
Lordsburg Quadrangles, Hidalgo County, New Mexico:
24
Geological
1:24,000
SurveyMiscellaneous
Investigations Map 1-1151,
L3
Appendix A
Description of Well
CuttingsFrom T1, T2
(Township 225, Range 20W, Section 6)
Explanation:
qtz = quartz, vol. = volcanics, Is = limestone,
Pred. = predominantly. Color is given in
accordance
withThe Rock Color
Loam = equal
particles.
Chart
Committee.
proportionsof clay, silt and sand
26
GEOLOGIC WELL Lo;
NEW
MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MIhTRAL RESOURCES
.
h i m a s ValleyProject
Location:
22.20.6.322a
Well started:
.
~~~~l~~ =h
Well Number: T-2
April26, 1981
Well finished:May
Samples describedby:
9, 1981
Total depth of well:
363 feet
Depth to water level:
142 feet
Depth
(type, grainconpsition, color, particle size, roundness, sorting,
cenentation, accessory minerals)
I
+ vol. grains/ 5 YR 6/4/ pebbles
‘Gravel to medium sand/qtz
>25mm/
sub-angular to rounded/poor sorting/calcite cement
Not sampled
t vel. grains/lO YR 7/4 to 5 YR
Very coarse sand-siltjqtz
anguior to sub-rounded/poor sorting/calcitc cement
a5
6/h/>
4mm
.
Fine gravel-silt/qtz,vel. , Is grains/lO YR 7/4/pebbles > 15 mm/sub-angular
to rJb-rounded/poor sorting/calcite cement/limonite staining
~
Very coarse sand-silt/qtzt vol. grains/lO YR ‘/$/pebbles > 3 mm/sub-angular
to sub-rounded/poor sorting/calcite cement
sub-rounded/poor sortinq/calcite cement
7
< llmm/sub-angular to sub-roundel
Gravel-silt/ls, qtz, vel. g?ains/lO YR /4/
:-I
105
115
110
20
i
poor sorting/calcite cement
Very coarse sand-silt/ls, qtz,
vol. grains/ 10 YR 7/4/ < 3mm/sub-angular
to sub-rounded/fair sorting/calcite cement
‘Fine gravel-silt/qtz, vol.,Is grains/ 10 YR 7/4/ < 5mm/sub-angular so
rounded/fair sorting/calcite cement
Very coarse sand-silt/qtz, val.,Is grains/ 10 YR 7/4/ < 7mm/sub-angular
to rounded/poor sorting/calcire cement
Coarse sand-silt/lO YR 7/4/pebbles< 5mm/anuular to sub-rounded/
fair sortinq/calcite cement
Coarse sand-silt/qtz, V O ~ . , Is grains/ 10 YR 7/4/ < 2mm/sub-anqular
to sub-rounded/fair sorting/calcite cement
Coarse sand-silt/qtz, vol.,Is grains/ 10 YR 7/4/ < 2mm/sub-anqular to
135
sub-rounded/fair sorting/calcite cement
Very ccarse-fine sand/qtz grains/
5 YR 7/4/ < 4mm/sub-angular to
rounded/poor sorting/calcite cement
27
GEOMGIC WELL
lnxI
NE% M
E
X
C
IO BUREAU O f MINES AND M I N E R A L RESOURCES
A n b a s Valley Project
Samples
described
Location:
Well started:
by:
22.20.6.322a
.
April
26,
Well finished:
May
1981
1981
9,
Douqlas &&h
Well Number:
T-2
Total depth of well:
363
feet
Depth to water level:
142 feet
Depth
(type, grain composition, color, particle size, roundness, sorting,
c&,?lentation, accessory minerals)
14-
145
YR
Fine qravel-silt/qtz, rhy. qrains/lO
-
Fine
gravel-silt/qtz
poor
-
grains/lO
YR '/4/
sorting/calcite
cement
sub-rounded/poor sorting/calcite cement
-
Fine qravel-silt/atz, VOl.arains/lO YR 7/4/ < 6mm/sub-anqular to
sub-zounded/poor
-
150
sortina/calcite cement
Fine gravel-silt/qtz grains/lOYR 7/4/
Very coarse sand-silt/qtz, Vol. fragments/lO
YR 7/4/ < 2mm/angular to
-
-
sub-rounded/poor sorting/calcite cement
-
175 130 -
Fine snnd silt/rnlcite
to
Very fine sand-silt/someqtz pebbles to lOmm, calcite, vol. fraaments/
10 YR '/4/angular
to sub-rounded/moderate sortinq/calcite cement
Very coarse-very fine sand/qtz, calcife-nodules,
v o l . fraqments/lO YR 7/4/
sub-angular to sub-rounded/poor sorting/calcite cement
Is, vol. fragments/lO YR 7/4/angular to
Very coarse-very fine sand/qtz,
rounded/poor sorting/calcite cement
Coarse sand w/gravel-fine sand/ls, qtz,
vol. fragments/lO YR 7/4/pebbles
> Gmm/moderate sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement/
MnO
dendriteson pebbles
Coarse sandy gravel-fine sand/calcite nodules, qtz, fragmentdl0
vol.
YR
pebbles > 5 mm/sub-angular to sub-rounded/moderate sorting/
i
calcite cement
Predominantly medium sand w/coarse to fine sand/calcite
nodules, qtz. V O l .
1
J
nnrhllp9 q+7. VOl. fmgmmLs,/ln V u 7bA/an"-r
sub-rounded/moderate sortinq/calcite cement
I
205
< 5mm/anqular to sub-rounded/
poor sorting/calcite cement
155-
21 03 05-
< 5mm/angular to sub-rounded/
Fine gravel-fine sandjqtz,Vola fragments/lO YR '/4/ < lOmm/angular to
155
170
6mm/angular to sub-rounded/
poor sorting/calcite cement
-
150
7/4L<
'
fragments/lO YR '/4/coarse
rounded/calcite cement
sand to 2 mm/poor sorting/sub-angular to
7/4,
-
GEOLOGIC WELL Ixx;
e
28
, .
NEW M E X I C O BUREAU OF MINES AND M I N E R A L RESOURCES
h i m a s ValleyProject
Samples described by:
'
Douglas Heath
-
Location:
77 7n.G 377n
Well Number:
Well started:
Auril 26, 1981
Total depth of well:
363
9,1981
Depth to water level:
142 feet
Well finished:May
ion Depth
feet
Thickness
(type, grain composition, color, particle
size, roundness, sorting,
ceTentation, accessory minerals)
20 2
Pred. medium sand w/coarse to fine sand/ls,
qtz, vel. fragments/lO YR '/4/
210
-
215
-
sand to 2mm/poor sorting/sub-angular to roundedicalcite
cement
Pred. fine sand w/coarse to viry fine sand/calcite nodules,
qtz, vel.
7
fraqments/lO YR /4/sand to 2 mm/noor sort.inq/sub-anqular tp sub-rounded/
d l L L Le L r i l l r r r L
Very fine sandto silt w/coarse-fine sand/calcite nodules,
qtz, vol. fraqs/
10 YR 7/4/pebbles > 5mm/poor sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcit&
Very fine sand to silt w/coarse to fine sand/calcite
nodules, qtz, v o l . frag!
10 Y;i 7/4/some pebbles > lOmm/poor
sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/
calcite cement
VR 7,4,
Medium sand w/verv coarse to very fine sand/atz, fraoments/lO
qrains < ?.mm/poor sortinq/sub-anqular to sub-rounded/colcite cement
Pred. medium-fine sand w/fine qravel and clay/ls,
qtz, vol. fraqments/5 YR
7/
grains < 5mm/poor sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite
cement
235
Pred. medium-fine sand w/coarse sand and clay/ls,
qtz, vol. fragrnents/5 YR 7/
grains < 3mm/poor sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite
cement
240
Very fine sand-clay w/?ebbles/ls, qtz, vol. fragments/5
YR 7/2/pebbles <: lonu
poor sorting/angular to sub-rounded/calcitn cement
245
~~~
'Fine sand-clay w/very coarse sand/ls,- vol.
qtz, fragments/5 YR 7/2/grains
i
250
< 2mm/poor sorting/angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
1
Fine sand-clay w/very coarse sand/ls,
qtz, VOX. fragments/5 YR 7/2/gYains
25q
< 2mm/poor sortinq/anqular to sub-rounded/cnlcite cement
Pred. clay w/fine sand/qtz,v o l . fragments/5 YR '/2/qrains < .25mm/
moderate sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcitecement
Pred. clay w/fine sand/qtz, "01. fragments/5 Y R 7/2/grains < .25mm/
moderate sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcitecement
265
270
{
275 J
.
'
Clay-silt-very fine sand/qtz, vol. fragments/5 YR 7/2/grains < .125mm/
moderate sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
Clay-silt-pebbles/qtz, vol. fragments/5 YR 7/2/pehbles< 5mm/poor sorting/
I
sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
on
29
GEOLLXIC WELL LOG
NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL
mimas Valley Project
Location:
Well finished:
by:
Samples
described
'
Well Number:
22.20.6.322a
Well started:
April
26,
Depth
RESOURCES
Douglas
Heath
T-2
Total
depth
of well:
363
feet
Depth to water
level:
feet
142
1981
May 9, 1981
Thickness
(type, grain composition,color, particle size, roundness,sorting,
cementation, accessoryminerals)
Clay-silt-oebbles/qtz, vol. fraqments/lO YR 7/2/pebbles < 4mm/poOr sortins/
50
sub-anqular
to
sub-rounded/calcite
cement
Clay-silt-very fine sand/qtz,
hol. fragments/lO YR '/Z/grains
85
90
< .125mm/
moderate sorting/sub-angularto sub-rounded/calcite cement
Clay-silt-pebbles/qtz;
v o l . fragments/lO YR 7/2/grains < 4mm/poor sorting/
sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
Clay-silt-minor pebbles/qtz,vol. fragments/lO YR 7/2/ < 4mm/pOOr sortins/
95
sub-F.,ngular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
Clay-silt-medium sancl/qtz, vol. fragments/lO
YR 7/2/ < lmm/moderate sorting/
oc
sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
Clay-silt-fine sand/qtz, vol. fragmentdl0 YR 7/2/ < .l.Xmm/moderate sorting/
05
sub-angilar to sub-rounded/calcite cement
Clay-silt-medium sand/qtz, vol. fraqments/lO YR 7/2/ < .5mni/sub-anoular
1c
15
'
to sub-rounded/calcite cement
Clay-silt-very fine sand/qtz, vol. fragments/lO
YR 7/2/ < .125mm/moderate
sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
'Clay-silt-coarse sand/qtz, vol. fragmSnts/lO
YR 7/2/ < lmm/poor Sorting/
2c
sub-anqular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
Clay-silt-pebbles/qtz, vol. fragments/lO YR 7/2/ < 5mm/poor sortins/
.2E
.3(
sub-angular
to
rounded/calcite
cement
Clay-si1.t-medium sand/qtz,vol.. fragmentdl0 YR 7/ 2 / < .5mm/moderate
sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
Clay-silt-medium sand/qtz, s s , Vol. fragmentdl0 YR 7/2/ < .5mm/moderate
131
sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
YR 7 / 2 / < ,25mm/moderate sorting/
Clay-silt-fine sand/qtz, vol. fragments/lO
sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
!4(
Clay-silt-fine sand/qtz,vol. fragments/lO YR
sub-angular tosub-rounded/calcite'cement
'/2/
< .25m?/mO'i€Xate sorting/
30
GEOLKGIC WELL UX;
NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Animas ValleyProject
Location:
.
Well started:
Depth
4-;
350 -
355
360
:E3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.
describedby:
Douulas
Well Number:
April 26, 1981
Total depth of well:
363 feet
Depth to water level:
142 feet
9, 1981
Thickness
-
Samples
22.20.6.322a
Well finished:May
on
.
.
Heath
T-2
'
(type, grain composition, color, particlesize, roundness, sorting,
cenentation, accessory minerals)
Clav-silt-verv fine sand/ls.gtz, VOl. fraqments/lO YR 7/2/ < .125mm/
moderate sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
Clay-silt-medium sand/qtz, ss,' v o l . fragments/lO YR 7/2/ < .5mm/poor
sorting/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement:
Clay-silt-medium sandjqtz,ss, vol.. fragments/lO' YR7/2/ < .55mm/
poor .sorting/sub-angular
to
sub-rounded/calcite
cement
Clay-silt-medium sand/qtz, vol. fragments/lO YR
'/2/ < .5mm/pOOr
sortjnq/sub-anuular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
G E O W I C WELL
NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES ANDMIh'ERAL
Animas Valley Project
Location:
Well started:
.
e
RESOURCES
.
Samples described by:
Jim Boyle
22.20.6.322
Well Number:
T-1
April 6, 1981
Total depth of well:
415 feet
Depth to water level:
143 feet
Well finished:
April24, 1981
Well elevation: 4,159 feet (msl)
ion Depth
LDC
-
Thickness
(type, grain composition, color, particle size, rounrbess, sorting,
cementation, accessory minerals)
Silty loam/qtz, Is, vol. fraqments/lO YR 5/3/grains < .OSmm/sub-rounded/
poor sortinq/calcite cement
Sandy loam/qtz, vol. fragmentsj5 YR '/3/grains< lmm/sub-angular/poor
sorting/calcite cement/biotite accessory
Silty loam/qtz grainsjl0 YR 5/3/grains
< .05mm/sub-angular/moderate
sorting/calcite cement/biotite accessory
Sandy loam/qtz, Is,
"01.
fragments/5 YR '/3/grains
< .5mm/sub-rounded/
poor sorting/calcite cement
Silty loam/qtz, Is,
VOI
.
fraqmentsp5 YR 4/4/grains< .05mm/sub-rounded/
moderate sortinq/calcite cement
Silty loam/qtz, Is,
"01.
fragments/5 YR 4/4/grains < .05inm/sub-rounded/
poor sorting/calcite cement
Sandy loam/a_tz, vol. fragments/5 YR 5/3/grains< .5mm/sub-angular/
.
poor sorting/minor calcite cement
Sandy bam/qtz, vel. fragments/5 YR '/3/grains < .5mm/sub-angular/
poor sorting/minor calcite cement
/ctz.ml
fraoments/5'YR 3/4/qrains
< .05mm/sub-r u e d /
moderate sortina/minor calcite cement
Sandy lo_aI/qtz, vol,fraqments/5 YR 3/3/qrains < .lmm/sub-anaular/
poor soEtinq/calcite cement/biotite accessroy
Sandy loam/qtz, Is, vol. fragments/5 YR 3/3/grains < .lmm/sub-angular/
poor sorting/ calcite cement
Clay-silty loam/gtz, Is, vol. fragments/5 YR 4/3/grains < .05mm/sub-rounded/
poor sorting/calcite cement
Clay loam/ls grains/5YR '/4/grains
< .002mm/good sorting
Clay loam/ls grains/5 YR '/3/grains < .002 mm/good sorting/calcite
cement
Clay loam/ls, qtz grains/5 YR >/3/grains
< .002mm/good sorting/
calcite
cement
LDt
G E O L ( K 1 C XELL
NDJ M E X I C O BUREAU OF M I N E S AND M I N E R A L
Animas Valley Project
.
April 6, 1981
'
Well finished:April24,
32
9
.I
RESOURCES
.6.322
Location:
Well started:
e
1981
Samples described by:
Jim Boyle
Well Number:
T-1
Total depth of well:
415 feet
Depth to water level:
143 feet
Depth
(type, ?rain composition, color, particle size, roundness, sorting,
cementation, accessory minerals)
8
7
-
Clay loam/qtz, 1s Grains (24mm)/5 YR 5/3/arains < .002mm/poor sorting/
calcite cement
90
95
-
Clay loam/ls, qtz, vol. fragments
.
poor sorting/calcite cement
-25 -
-30 -
Clay loam/ls, qtz, vol. fragments
'
(<
8mm)/5 YR 5/3/grains < .002mm/
(<
8mm)/5 YR 5/3/grains
< .002mm/
poor korting/calcite cement/manganese on
IS fragments
Loam/qtz, Is, vol. fragments/5 YR "/3/grains < .5mm/sub-rounded/
fair sorting
Is granules/5 YR 4/3/sub-angular to sub-rounded/
Coarse sandy loam/qtz,
- 3 5-
-40 -55 -60 -
"1
r. 00
:I
230
-I
240
-I
grains < 2.Omm/poor sorting/calcite cement
Coarse loamv sand/qtz,Is granules/5 YR '/j/sub-angular
grains < 2.0mm/poor sortinn/calcite cement
Pebbly loamy sand/qtz,Is, vol. pebbles
(<
to sub-rounded/
-
8mm)/sand grainse1-2m/
sub-angular to sub-rounded/poor sortiny/calcite cement/manganeseon 1s
Coarse loamy sand/qtz, vol. pebbles
(< 4mm)/5 YR '/3/sand
grains .5-lmm/
sub-angular to sub-rounded/poor sorting/calcite cement
Loamy sand/atz, Is, vol. pebbles (< 4k)/5 YR 3/4/sand arains <
.l m m f
sub-anqular to sub-rounded/rroderate sortinq/calcite cement
Loamy sand/qtz pebbles(< 4mm), Is, vol. fraqments/5 YR 4/2/sand srains
.
< .lmm/sub-anyular/poor sortiny/calcite cement
Pebbly loamy sand/qtz,v o l . pebbles
(<
8mm)/5 YR 4/2/sub-angular to
sub-rounded/poor sorting/minor calcite cement
Pebbly loamy sand/qtz, vol.pebbles (< 16mm)/5 YR '/Z/sub-angular
to
sub-rounded/poor sorting/minor calcite cement
Pebbly clays/qtz, vol. pebbles
(<
8mm)/5 YR 6/4; 5 Y
5/3/sub-angular
-1
to sub-rounded/good sorting/calcite cement
Pebbly clays/few qtz pebbles(< 4mm)/5 YR 6/4; 5 Y
5/3/sub-angular
to sub-rounded/good sorting/calcite cement
3
(type, grain composition, color,particle size, roundness, sorting,
canentation, accessory minerals)
Silty-clay loam/qtz, Is pebbles
(<
4mm)/5 YR 6/4; 5 Y
5/3/sub-anqular
to sub-rounded/moderate sorting/calcite cement
Silty-clay loam/fine sand(< .kmm)/5 YR 6/4; 5 Y
calcite
cement
Siltv-cl-r
and 5 Y
'/3/moderate sortins/
atz aranules/verv fine sand( < .lmm)/5 YR 6/4
.
5/3/moderate
sortinq/calcite
cement
Silty clay loam/qtz, vol. pebbles(< 4mm)/5 YR 6/4; 5 Y
5/3/sub-anqular
to st.b-rounded/poor sortinq/calcite cement
Silty-clay loam/qtz, Is, vol. pebbles
(<
4mm)/5 YR 6/4; 5 Y
5/3/sub-
ansular to sub-rounded/aoor sortins/calcite cement
Silty clay loam/qtz, vol. pebbles
(<
4mm)/5 YR
'14; 5 Y s/3/
fine
sand (< .5mm)/sub-anqular to sub-rounded/poor sorting/calcite cement
Silty-clay loam/qtz,vol. fragments/5
YR 6/4; 5 Y
fine sand
'/3/
(< .5mm)/sub-angular to sub-rounded/moderate sorting/calcite cement
Silty-clay lsam/qtz,vol. pebbles
(<
4mm)/5 YR
'14; 5 Y '/3/
fine
sand < .5mm/sub-angular to sub-rounded/fair sorting/calcite cement
silty-clay loam/qtz,vol. fraqments/5'YR
(<
6/4; 5 Y '/3/
fine sand.
.5mm)/sub-angular to sub-rounded/fair sorting/calcite cement
Silty-clay loam/qtz, vol. fragments/5 YR
6/4; 5 Y 5/3/sub-angul&
to
sub-rounded/moderate sortinq/calcite cement
Silty-clay loam/qtz, vol. fragments/5
(<
YR 6/4; 5 y '/3/
- 5 4 )/sub-angular to sub-rounded/moderate
Silty-clay loam/qtz, vol. pebbles (<
sorting/calcite
5
4m)/ 5 YR 6/4; 5 Y /3/
sand (< .5mm)/sub-angular to sub-rounded/calcite cement
silty clay/5YR 614; 5 ~5/3/calcite
fine sand
cement
cement
fine
APPENDIX B
Drillers' l o g s of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo
County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values i n f e e t )
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
24.20.1.410
4,155
top soil
0
5
clay
,
-
-
clay
120
sand and gravel
130
clay
140
-
50
sand and gravel
90
5
5
50
45
90
40
120
30
130
10
140
10
150
10
24.20.9.424
4,158
soil
0
10
clay
10
20
sand
30
10
clay
40
10
sand and gravel
50
10
clay
60
2
0
15
Well Location
Well Elevation
soil
24.20.13.414
4,160
sand
gravel and
'
-
sandy c l a y
Well Location
Well Elevation
Thickness
To
15
10
clay
25
20
sand
45
13
clay
58
5
35
D r i l l e r s ' logs of wells i n Animas Valley,HidalgoCounty,
(Thickness and depth values i n feet)
Description
Depth
New Mexico
Thickness
.
To
Well Location
Well Elevation
24.20.19.000
4,190
soil
4
4
c l a y and gravel
43
39
gravel
45
2
blue clay
86
41
tight gravel with water
106
20
blue clay
,122
16
g r a v e l and water
126
4
blueclay
129
3
136
7
c l a y and gravel
142
6
sand rock
150
8
t r a p rock and
water
36
s Vallev. Hi~dalnnC n n n t v . New Maltirn
Thickness
172
60 -
190
-
0
4
60
70
76
77
92
93
113
170
4
4
56
70
10
76
6
77
1
92
15
93
1
113
20
170
57
172
2
190
18
206
16
216
10
233
17
2 34
-
252
252
-
253
1
260
7
261
1
268
7
276
8
300
24
206
216
233
268
-
276
-
253
260
261
234
1
18
37
Drillers' logs
of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values i n f e e t )
Description
Well Location
Well Elevation
To
24.20.19.440
4,180
gray clay and gravel
0
-
60
60
gray volcanic tuff
119
-
gravel
130
-
137
7
red rhyolite
137
-
485
348
gravel
485
489
4
red rhyolite
489
500
11
raendd e s i t e
500
507
7
gray clay
507
564
57
gray clay
564
591
27
red clay
591
615
24
brown c l a y
6 15
620
5
grave 1
620
621
1
brown c l a y
621
626
5
gravel
626
627
1
brown c l a y
627
630
3
gravel
630
631
1
gray clay
631
639
8
gravel
639
640
1
red clay
640
643
3
5
5
28
23
65
37
sand,gravel,
gray clay
.
Thickness
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
and water
and gravel
60
62
24.20.22.112
4,165
soil
0
w/gravel
claygray
5
graveland sand
28
-
-
-
-
62
2
119
57
130
11
38
Drillers' logs
of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo County, New Mexico
i n feet)
(Thickness and depth values
Description
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
0
clay
15
sand
22
clay
30
sand
-
22
30
7
8
35
5
35
100
65
0
-
100
28.20.25.310
4,170
sandy c l a y
85
-
clay
88
-
0
sandy c l a y
5
sandy c l a y and gravel
20
sand, gravel
40
Well Location
15
-
soil
Well Elevation
15
24.20.23.310
4,165
f i n e sand and gravel
mixed w i t h c l a y
Well Location
Well Elevation
To
24.20.22.421
4,165
sand
Well Location'
Well Elevation
Thickness
Depth
and c l a y
24.20.25.400
4,175
soil
0
clay
3
sandy c l a y
sandy clay, gravel
42
105
-
5
5
a0
15
40
20
85
45
88
3
90
2
3
3
42
39
105
63
150
45
39
Drillers' logs of wells i n h i m a s Valley, Hidalgo County,
(Thicknessanddepthvalues
i n feet)
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well E l e v a t i o n
New Mexico
Thickness
To
24.20.29.323
4,177
soil
0
-
5
5
sand and gravel
5
-
10
10
-
5
11
1
sand and gravel
11
-
30
19
gray clay
30
-
40
10
red clay .
40
-
48
8
sand and gravel
48
65
17
clay
65
66 -
gravel
66
-
75
9
sandandgravel
75
-
125
50
soil
0
-
3
3
gravelandsand
3
-
12
9
clay and gravel
12
40
28
brown c l a y a n d s a n d
40
60
20
sand and gravel
60
-
75
15
clay,sandandgravel
75
-
105
30
brown c l a y a n d s a n d
105
brown c l a y
clay
Well L o c a t i o n
Well E l e v a t i o n
1
24.20.29.341
4,180
120
15
120
-
125
5
sand and gravel
125
-
132
7
yellow clay
132
171
39
blueclay
171
191
20
sand and clay
191
210
19
gravel a n d c l a y
210
228
18
gravel and clay
228
250
22
red c l a y
250
490
240
-
40
Drillers' l o g s of wells i n Animas Valley,HidalgoCounty,
(Thickness and depth values
i n feet)
Description
Depth
New Mexico
Thickness
To
Well Location
Well Elevation
25.19.7.210
4,205
3
3
brown c l a y
50
47
brown c l a y ,g r a v e l
93
43
soil
7
7
clay
25
18
sand and gravel
48
13
clay
120
72
sand and gravel
150
30
soil
Well Location
Well Elevation
'.
Well Location
Well Elevation
25.19.7.234
4,205
25.19.7.234b
4,205
bedrock @ 85'
Well Location
Well Elevation
25.19.7.234~
4,205
bedrock (3 87'
Well Location
Well Elevation
25.20.1.242
4,183
5
5
5
-
55
50
sand, gravel and clay
55
-
75
20
sandy s h a l e
75
-
125
50
125
-
205
80
soil
0
sandy s h a l e
sand,gravel,
and c l a y
Drillers' logs
of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values
in feet)
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
25.20.10.222
4,190
gravel
36
clay
42
-
grave 1
61
-
not available
73
gravel
90
clay
96
sand and gravel
with c l a y s t r e a k s
Well Location
Well Elevation
-
100
25.20.10.334
4,200
15
-
clay
25
-
gravel and sand
40
clay
68
gravel and sand
85
soil
0
clay
5
gravel and sand
'
0
clay
Thickness
To
15
-
36
36
42
6
61
19
73
12
90
17
96
6
100
4
180
80
5
5
10
,
25
10
40
15
68
28
85
17
105
20
145
40
152
7
clay gravel
105
red clay
145
-
c l a y and gravel
152
-
163
11
blue clay
163
-
170
7
42
Drillers' logs
of wells i n mimas Valley, Hidalgo
County,.New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values
i n feet)
Description
well Location
Well Elevation
Thickness
Depth
From
To
25.20.13.124
4,195
gravel
25
25
25
-
50
25
50
-
80
30
120
40
140
20
145
5
190
45
2co
10
250
50
0
gravel and sand
clay
sand,
gravel,
sand and gravel
80
-
clay
120
sand and gravel
140
c l a y and gravel
145
sand and gravel
190
clay
200
-
blue clay
250
-
400
150
soil
0
-
4
4
clay,sand,gravel
4
-
84
80
sand and gravel
84
-
89
5
clay
89
-
110
21
128
18
170
42
190
20
281
91
Well Location
Well Elevation
25.20.13.213
4,195
sand and gravel
110
c l a y , sand and gravel
128
sand and gravel
170
-
blue clay
190
-
43
Drillers' l o g s of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgocounty,
New Mexico
(Thickness and d e p t h v a l u e s i n f e e t )
Description
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
25.20.13.221
4 I 195
Depth
-
sandy c l a y
15
-
sand and gravel
75
-
top s o i l
0
gravel
8
sand,clay,gravel
105
sand a n d gravel
120
sand,clay
130
and gravel
c l a y and gravel
165
sandy shale
200
blue clay
250
Well Iiocation
Well Elevation
Thickness
To
-
8
8
15
7
75
60
105
30
120
15
130
10
165
35
200
35
250
50
400
150
25.20.13.233
4,199
5
5
5
-
15
10
sand and gravel
15
-
24
9
sandy clay
24
-
79
54
sand
79
-
85
6
sandy c l a y
85
-
110
35
soil
0
clay
125
15
145
20
145
-
255
110
sand
255
-
265
10
sandy c l a y
265
475
2 10
conglomerate
475
-
510
35
sandy clay
5 10
-
600
90
sand and gravel
110
sandy c l a y
125
sandy clay
44
Drillers'
logsof wells in Animas Valley, Hidalgo County,
(Thickness and depth values in feet)
New
Depth
Description
From
TO
0
2
2
2
12
10
clay
12
32
20
gravel
32
40
8
gravel and sand
40
90
50
red
90
95
5
95
165
70
green clay
165
228
63
buff clay
228
238
10
238
255
17
buff clay
255
275
20
gravel
275
280
5
gray
gravel
280
340
60
gray conglomerate
340
350
10
Well Location 25.20.16.333
well Elevation 4,215
soil
sand
and
gravel
clay
gray clay
gravel
and
clay
WellLocation25.20.20.444
Well Elevation 4,226
0
-
104
104
gravel
104
-
124
20
clay
124
-
230
106
gravel
230
290
60
c2 ay
290
292
2
wavailable
-
Mexico
45
Drillers' l o g s of wells i n Animas Valley, Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values i n f e e t )
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
,
25.20.22.313
4,220
soil
0
grave 1
6
clay
38
50
gravel
50
56
clay
56
gravel
72
gravel
76
clay
85
gravel
90
gravel
98
clay
115
gravel
125
clay
140
coarse gravel
150
blueclay
157
Well Location
Well Elevation
-.
6
6
-
38
32
-
90
12
6
72
16
76
4
85
9
-
-
5
98
8
115
17
125
10
140
15
150
10
157
7
208
51
6
6
18
12
63
45
124
61
190
66
215
25
225
10
265
40
300
35
25.20.23.443
4,223
soil
0
gravel
6
-
gravel
124
red clay
190
grave 1
215
red clay
225
-
gray clay
265
-
18
red clay
gray clay
Thickness
To
and gravel
63
46
Drillers' logs
of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values in feet)
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
25.20.24.132
4,215
soil
0
-
8
8
sandy c l a y
8
-
26
18
gray clay
26
-
40
14
sandy c l a y
40
-
59
19
sand and gravel
59
76
17
brown clay
76
91
15
sand and gravel
91
139
48
182
43
230
48
260
30
395
135
sandy c l a y
139
sand and gravel
:
230
blueclay
260
25.20.25.113
4,225
..
-
.
-
-
3
3
3
-
5
2
5
-
35
30
50
15
75
25
100
25
115
15
122
7
128
6
soil
0
sand
clay
-
sand and gravel
35
clay
50
sand
75
clay
100
sand
115
clay
122
-
gravel
128
-
136
8
clay
136
-
145
9
gravel
145
-
152
7
185
33
220
35
325
105
sandy c l a y , some
gravelstreaks
185
-
brown and b l u e c l a y
220
-
sandy c l a y
-
182
sandy c l a y and gravel
WellLocation
Well Elevation
-
Thickness
TO
2 15
47
Drillers' logs of wells i n Anbas Valley,Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values i n f e e t )
Description
Well Location
Well Elevation
Thickness
Depth
From
TO
25.20.25.314
4,230.
sandy c l a y and gravel
14
sand and gravel
22
-
sandy c l a y and gravel
28
-
clay
70
sand
100
clay
108
sand and gravel '
112
clay
118
sand and graval
126
clay
135
sand and gravel
140
clay
160
blue bentonite
212
conglomerate
259
clay
510
sandy c l a y and gravel
sand End gravel
.
0
8
-
-
8
8
14
6
22
8
28
6
70
42
100
30
108
8
112
4
118
6
126
8
135
9
140
5
160
20
212
52
259
47
510
251
514
4
48
Drillers' logs of wells i n himas Valley,HidalgoCounty,
( T h i c k n e s s a n d d e p t h values i n f e e t )
D eThickness
scription
New Mexico
Depth
From
TO
25.20.26.144
4,225
Well L o c a t i o n
Well Elevation
0
12
12
clay
12
14
2
sand and gravel
14
40
clay
40
44
4
44
55
11
sand and gravel
55
82
27
clay
a2
86
4
sandandgravel
86
105
19
105
116
11
sand
116
12G
4
unavailable
120
2G6
86
redclayandsand
206
252
46
tan clay
252
280
28
gray clay
280
436
156
sandygravel
436
495
59
conglomerate
495
636
141
636
751
115
soil
0
6
6
clay
6
50
44
50
160
110
gravel
160
250
90
brown c l a y
250
5 00
250
conglomerate
500
750
250
surface s o i l
sand and
gravel
sand and gravel
gravelly clay and
Well L o c a t i o n
Well E l e v a t i o n
:
gravel
'
26
25.20.27.340
4,230
clay with gravel streaks
4Y
Drillers'
logsof wells in Animas Valley, Hidalgo County,
(Thickness and depth values in feet)
Description
Thickness
Depth
From
Well Location 25.20.27-412
Well Elevation 4,225
gravel and sand
To
0
-
65
65
clay
65
-
80
15
gravel
80
95
15
clay
95
-
102
7
102
-
121
19
121
127
6
135
8
i42
7
150
8
150
-
168
18
168
-
177
9
clay
177
200
23
gravel, sand
200
-
205
5
clay
205
-
230
25
280
50
425
145
636
211
713
77
gravel
. clay
gravel
127
clay
135
sand
and
gravel:
clay
sand
and
gravel
142
230
blue
clay
tan
sandy
clay
280
and
gravel
425
sand
clay
-
New
636
-
Mexico
50
Drillers' logs
of wells i n Animas Valley,HidalgoCounty,
i n feet)
(Thickness and depth values
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
,
L
New Mexico
Thickness
To
25.20.33.430
4,230
soil
0
6
6
sand and gravel
6
30
24
c l a y and gravel
30
50
20
brown c l a y
50
70
20
gravel
70
90
20
brown c l a y
90
101
11
gravel
101
130
29
brown c l a y
130
180
50
gravel
180
200
20
brown c l a y
200
270
70
sandand
270
320
50
green clay
320
407
87
brown c l a y
407
425
18
clay
425
442
17
gravel and c l a y
442
480
38
s t r e a k s of gravel and c l a y
480
550
70
gravel
550
570
20
s t r e a k s of gravel and c l a y
5 70
685
115
clay
51
Drillers' logs of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo County, New Mexico
i n feet)
(Thickness and depth values
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
Thickness
TO
25.20.34.140
4,230
soil
0
2
2
c l a y and g r a v e l
2
77
75
gravel
77
105
28
gravel
105
107
2
red clay
107
131
24
gravel
131
134
3
red clay
134
168
34
brown sand
168
170
2
red clay
170
281
gray clay
281
284
3
red clay
2 84
340
44
blue clay
340
376
36
red clay
376
407
31
gray clay
407
428
21
red clay
428
480
52
blueclay
480
482
2
r e d c l a y and gravel
482
610
128
sand and c l a y
610
628
18
andesite
628
630
2
c l a y and gravel
630
634
4
red clay
634
7 14
80
red conglomerate
714
774
60
gravel
774
779
5
gray clay
779
733
4
gravel
783
787
4
gray clay
787
799
12
gravel
799
813
14
g r a v e l and c l a y
813
886
73
graysand
886
900
14
111
52
Drillers'
logsof Wells inAnhas Valley, Hidalgo County,
(Thickness and depth values in feet)
Description
Depth
FrOm
New
Mexico
Thickness
To
Well Location 25.20.34.240
Well Elevation 4,235
3
3
3
-
50
47
clay
50
-
70
20
grave1
70
-
150
80
soil
0
gravel and sand
blue clay
380
-
conglomerate
480
-
streaks
of
WellLocation
gravel
and
clay
150
380
230
480
100
710
230
8
8
11
3
16
5
31
15
120
89
126
6
206
80
378
172
26.19.31.333
. Weil Elevation 4,340
soii
0
red clay
8
-
393
15
393
-
610
220
fine sand
610
-
615
5
clay, sand and gravel
615
625
10
clay
625
680
55
695
15
780
65
970
2 10
980
10
gravel
11
brown clay
16
red
31
brown
conglomerate
clay
120
red conFlomerate loose
126
red
206
brown
clay
sand
clay
clay
and
and
378
gravel
gravel
695
clay
sand
clay
680
andgravel.
780
70 9
-
53
Drillers' logs of wells i n himas Valley, Hidarlgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values i n feet)
Description
Depth
From
Thickness
TO
Well Location . 26.20.3.410a
Well Elevation 4,250
soil
0
4
4
gravel
4
17
13
c l a y and gravel
17
70
53
sand and gravel
70
96
26
sand and gravel
96
100
4
sandy c l a y and gravel
100
120
20
red and blue clay,
some gravel
120
195
75
red sand and gravel
195
270
75
red clay
270
325
55
yellow clay
325
335
10
r e d c l a y and gravel
335
363
28
sand and gravel
363
370
7
c l a y and gravel
370
409
39
gravel
4 09
440
31
r e d c l a y and gravel
440
485
45
sand and gravel
485
521
36
brown c l a y
521
528
7
sand and gravel
528
603
75
54
Drillers' logs
of wells i n Animas Valley,HidalgoCounty,
(Thickness and depth values
i n feet)
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
New Mexico
Thickness
To
26.20.4.324
4,245
soil
0
5
5
sandy c l a y
5
12
7
gravel
12
30
18
sand and gravel
30
55
25
clay
55
60
5
sand and gravel
60
68
8
clay
68
92
23
sand and gravel
92
110
18
c l a y , sandy
110
123
13
sand and gravel
123
130
7
sandy c l a y
130
170
40
conglomerate
170
205
35
sandy c l a y
205
248
43
clay
248
279
31
sand and gravel
279
281
2
brown c l a y
281
320
39
blueclay
320
380
60
brown sandy c l a y
380
410
30
sand and gravel
410
4 15
5
f i n e sand
415
430
15
gravel
430
443
13
clay
443
450
7
largegravel
450
460
10
clay
460
580
1 20
conglomerate
5 80
595
15
clay
595
600
5
sand and gravel
600
605
5.
conglomerate
605
6 12
7
clay
612
631
19
55
Drillers' l o g s of wells i n himas Valley, Hidalgo County,
(Thickness and d e p t h v a l u e s i n f e e t )
Description
Thickness
Depth
To
From
Well L o c a t i o n
Well E l e v a t i o n
26.20.5.444
4,240
New Mexico
0
-
5
5
10
5
-
clay
10
-
17
7
gravel
17
27
27
47
10
clay
-
gravel
47
51
4
clay
51
72
72
76
21
gravel
clay
76
82
6
gravel
82
90
90
93
8
clay
gravel
93
-
118
25
121
3
126
5
142
16
150
8
160
10
165
5
220
55
235
15
500
265
soil
gravel
clay
118
gravel
121
clay
126 .
gravel
142
tan clay
150
sand and gravel
1 60
tan clay
165
sand and gravel
220
-
conglomerate
235
-
-
5
20
4
3
56
Drillers' logsof wells in Animas Valley, Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values in feet)
Description
Depth
From
26.20.8-443
WellLocation
Well Elevation 4,250
unavailable
To
0
150
15 0
15 0
170
20
170
175
5
tan
clay
sand
and
tan
clay
175
310
135
sandstone
310
320
10
tan
320
350
30
fine sand
350
355
5
tan
355
455
100
gravel
455
465
10
conglomerate
465
500
35
4
4
18
14
43
25
49
6
gravel
clay
clay
Well Location 26.20.9.243
Well Elevation 4,255
soil
0
grave1
4
tan, red clay
18
sand, silt, gravel
43
gravel
49
sand,. silt, gravel
56
56
-
-
7
142
86
154
12
212
58
2 12
-
280
68
blue clay
280
-
308
28
brown, red clay
308
-
454
146
sand, silt, gravel
454
-
481
27
sand
481
-
494
13
-
513
19
520
7
610
90
grave1
142
sand
154
sandy
clay
sand, silt, gravel
94 4
gravel
513
sand, silt, gravel
520
-
57
Drillers'
logsof wells in Animas Valley, Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values in feet)
Description
Thickness
To
0
5
5
5
41
36
41
48
7
48
70
22
70
95
25
95
205
110
205
225
20
225
260
35
clay and gravel:
260
275
15
sand
2 75
300
conglomerate
300
325
25
clay-rich
325
285
60
gravel
385
390
5
conglomerate
390
560
170
gravel
560
580
20
conglomerate
580
610
30
hard
610
700
90
Well Location 26.20.14- 343
well Elevation 4,290
soil
sand
and
gravel
clay
sand
and
gravel
clay
sand
and
gravel
clay
sand
,
Depth
From
and
and
gravel
gravel
conglomerate
conglomerate
.
25
Drillers' l o g s of wells i n Animas Valley, Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thicknessanddepthvaluesin
feet)
DThickness
escription
Depth
~
From
Well L o c a t i o n
Well E l e v a t i o n
. .
26.20.15.443
4,280
soil
0
clay
5
sand
35
brown c l a y
55
sand
105
streaks of clay and gravel
119
gravel
205
s t r e a k s of c l a y a n d
gravel
,
gravel
215
390
s t r e a k s of c l a y a n d g r a v e l
400
gravel
475
To
-
5
5
35
30
55
20
105
50
119
14
205
86
2 15
10
390
175
400
10
475
75
490
15
501
11
490
-
soil
0
-
5
5
light red gravel
5
-
40
35
conglomerate
40
-
351
311
conglomerate.
35 1
-.
607
256
0
-
30
30
30
-
150
120
150
-
450
300
450
-
500
50
streaks of clay
Well L o c a t i o n
Well E l e v a t i o n
and g r a v e l
26.20.24.333
4,308
Well Location
26.20.29.141
Well E l e v a t i o n
4,260
brown fill
conglomerate
c l a y ,s a n da n d
gravel
conglomerate
.
.
.
.-
59
Drillers' logs of wells i n Animas Valley,HidalgoCounty,
(Thickness and depth
values i n feet)
Description
Thickness
Depth
To
From
26.21.13.430
4,420
Well L o c a t i o n
Well E l e v a t i o n
0
-
360
360
b a d l yf r a c t u r e ds i l t s t o n e s ,
shales
360
-
460
100
sshi latlset o n e s ,
limestones highly fractured
460
-
701
241
90
90
120
30
g r a v eglrsa,nbiot eu l d e r s
Well L o c a t i o n
Well E l e v a t i o n
27.18.18.240
4,475
S i l t ,s a n da n dg r a v e l
.
New Mexico
sandandconglomerate
0
90
-
280
160
280
-
400
120
350
-
700
350
0
-
20
20
178
158
178
-
300
122
sandyclay
0
-
8
8
l o o s eg r a v e l
8
-
18
10
s i l t , sandand
gravel
rhyolite tuff
120
Well Location
27.19.11.231
Well E l e v a t i o n4 , 4 2 5
reddish rhyolite
Well-Location
27.19.19.100
Well E l e v a t i o n4 , 4 0 1
sandyclay
shale,hardclay
largegravelandsand
20
Well L o c a t i o n
27.19.19.100a
Well E l e v a t i o n4 , 4 0 1
sticky clay
35
sandy clay
100
-
p e a gravel w i t h s t r e a k s
of s a n d y c l a y a n d s a n d
130
-
clay and
some gravel
18
35
17
100
65
130
30
300
170
60
Drillers' logs
of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values i n f e e t )
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
Thickness
To
27.19.19.344
4,416
stony clay
23
-
red clay
40
-
110
70
sandy gray clay
110
-
128
18
sandy gray clay w/gravel
128
-
150
22
gravel
150
154
4
sandy c l a y
154
166
12
heavy gravel
1 66
168
2
c l a y w/sand and ,gravel
168
245
77
hard clay
245
256
11
gravel w/clay s t r a t a s
256
clay,conglomerates
clean hard conglomerates
sandy s o i l
0
-
23
23
40
17
300
44
300
-
620
320
620
-
750
130
soil
0
-
3
3
gravel,sand
3
-
6
3
gray clay
6
-
31
25
gravel
31
-
43
12
red clay
43
87
44
rocks and gravel
87
128
41
gravel,rocks,clay
128
142
14
c l a y and gravel
142
152
10
sand and gravel
152
157
5
largegravel
157
166
9
g r a v e l andsand
166
201
35
g r a v e l w/clay
201
-
215
14
c l a y and g r a v e l , sand
2 15
-
303
88
clay,conglomerate
303
-
620
317
clean hard conglomerate
620
-
750
130
Well Location
well Elevation
27.19.20.444
4,422
Drillers' l o g s of wells i n Animas Valley, Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values i n f e e t )
Description
Thickness
Depth
From
To
27.19.22.430
4,475
Well Location
Well Elevation
soil
0
-
2
2
brown clay,gravel
2
8
6
c a l i c h e and conglomerate
8
-
55
47
brown c l a y and gravel
55
-
65
10
gravel
65
90
25
brown c l a y and gravel
90
158
68
215
57
218
3
red rhyolite
158
r e d sandy c l a y
215
-
218
-
248
30
redrhyolite
248
-
320
72
brown clay and gravel
320
323
3
red clay
323
342
19
350
8
35 7
7
.brown c l a y and gravel
brown sandy clay
342
brown c l a y and gravel
350
brown c l a y and boulders
357
brown r h y o l i t e
359
-
soil
0
-
3
3
conglomerate
3
-
96
93
350
254
370
20
512
142
520
8
and gravel
Well Location
Well Elevation
359
2
400
41
27.20.2.420
4,338
conglomerate w/rhyolite
96
s h e l l y conglomerate
350
r h y o l i t e ,g r a n i t e
370
malpais,hard
512
-
'
62
Drillers' logs of w e l l s i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and d e p t h v a l u e s i n f e e t )
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
Thickness
To
27.20.2.424
4,344
soil
0
8
a
sand
8
29
21
malpais
29
53
24
clay
53
78
25
sandy c l a y
78
80
2
clay
80
128
48
sand and gravel
128
130
2
clay
130
200
70
0
33
33
clay
33
44
11
clay and malpais boulders
44
70
26
clay
70
87
17
soft streak of clay
a7
90
3
clay
90
110
20
sandy c l a y
110
122
12
sand and gravel
122
140
18
gravel
140
255
115
conglomerate
255
600
345
Well Location
Well Elevation
27.20.12.444
4,377
malpais
63
D r i l l ers' logs of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo
County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values i n feet)
Description
Depth
From
Well Location
Well Elevation
Thickness
TO
27.20.21.110
4,400
soil
0
-
2
2
limey clay
2
.-
100
98
quartzite boulder
100
-
105
5
limestonechert
105
-
180
75
red andesite
180
-
218
38
red a n d e s i t e
218
305
87
gray shale
205
-
307
2
red rhyolite
307
-
405
98
0
-
15
15
gravel
15
-
50
35
clay
50
c l a y and boulders
70
Well Location
Well Elevation
28.19.16.244
4,510
surface
gravel
240
c l a y and gravel
250
conglomerate and clay
290
sand and gravel
625
hard conglomerate
645
conglomerate
700
70
-
-
-
20
240
170
250
10
290
40
625
335
645
20
700
55
800
100
64
Drillers' logs of wells i n Animas valley, Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values i n f e e t )
Description
Depth
28.19.17.221
4,500
Well Location
Well Elevation
clay w/gravel
138
gravel and sand
2 15
r e d c l a y and gravel
227
gravel and sand
387
conglomerate
394
-
red clay
517
-
conglomerate
5 36
0
gray gravel
gravel and sand
red clay
Thickness
To
From
:
and small gravel
Well Location
Well Elevation
719
-
0
-
709
.
138
138
215
77
227
12
387
160
394
7
517
123
536
19
709
173
719
10
735
16
12
12
30
18
55
25
180
125
240
60
435
195
485
50
495
10
505
10
700
195
28.19.21.240
4,525
surface
gravel
.12
sand and gravel
30
clay
55
sandy clay
180
sand and pea gravel
240
large gravel
435
clay
485
gravel
495
conglomerates
505
-
65
Drillers' logs
of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values i n f e e t )
Description
Depth
From
well Location
Well Elevation
Thickness
TO
28.19-27.314
4,575
brown sand
0
9
9
sand,graveland.boulders
9
142
133
r e d c l a y and gravel
142
272
130
r e d conglomerate
272
277
5
c l a y and gravel
277
573
296
conglomerate
573
600
27
c l a y and gravel
600
6 72
72
gravel
672
676
4
red clay
676
720
44
r e d c l a y and gravel
'720
833
113
gray clay
833
892
59
r e d c l a y a n d gravel
892
931
39
gravel
931
944
13
r e d c l a y and gravel
944
LOO0
56
0
400
400
400
520
120
8
8
600
592
Well Location
well Elevation
and gravel
29.20.2.410
4,800
conglomerate and f i l l
whiterock
Well Location
Well Elevation
30.20.24.330
4,875
black clay w/gravel
0
conglomerate w/clay
8
-
0
66
APPENDIX C
wells i n Animas Valley,HidalgoCounty,
i n feet)
(Thickness and depth values
P e t r O k U m logs of
From
Well Location
Well Name
Well Elevation
Thickness
Depth
Description
New Mexico
To
22.20.14.234
Lonu and Gossum S t a t e #1
4,180 feet
Sand and brown mud
Brownmud
Sand, brown s h a l e
Sand and gravel
Gravel,sandandshale
Sand, brown s h a l e
Sandy brown s h a l e
Water and gravel
Gray s h a l e
Gravel and blue shale
Blue s h a l e
Brown s h a l e
Blue s h a l e
Brown s h a l e
Sand and water
Hard sand
Hard sand
Sand and g r a v e l
Gray s h a l e
Red s h a l e
Sand and gravel
Shale and gravel
Sand and s h a l e
Sand and gravel
Red s h a l e
Shale and gravel
Lime and g r a v e l
L i m e , hard
Red rock
Lime, hard
Red rock
Dark s h a l e
Sandy s h a l e
Sand and water
Shale,dark
Sand and water
Red s h a l e
P e n c i ls h a l e
Sand and water
Red s h a l e
Red sand
Red s h a l e
Red s h a l e
-
0
20
60
90
95
100
140
180
206
243
252
289
311
368
430
472
490
5 12
618
765
793
900
925
957
1,030
1,050
1,080
1,115
1,120
1,125
1,150
1,155
1,170
1,180
1,190
1,195
1,250
1,261
1,280
1,287
1,297
1,310
1,325
20
60
90
95
100
140
180
206
243
252
289
311
368
430
472
490
512
618
765
793
900
925
957
1,030
1,050
1,080
1,115
1,120
1,125
1,150
1,155
1,170
1,180
1,190
1,195
1,250
1,261
1,280
1,287
1,297
1,310
1,325
1,350
20
40
30
5
5
40
40
26
37
9
37
22
57
62
42
18
22
106
147
28
107
25
32
73
20
30
35
5
5
25
5
15
10
10
5
55
11
17
7
10
13
15
25
67
Petroleum logs
of wells i n Animas Valley,Hidalgo County, New Mexico
(Thickness and depth values
i n feet)
Description
Depth
From
Thickness
To
Well Location
22.20.14.234
Well Name
Long and Gossum S t a t e #1
Well Elevation4,180feet
Brown s h a l e
Sandy s h a l e
Red s h a l e
Sand and s h a l e
Sand and s h a l e , r e d
1,350
1,370
1,410
1,440
1,460
1,370
1,410
1,440
1,460
1,495
20
40
30
20
35
Petroleum
logsof wells in Animas Valley, Hidalgo County,
(Thickness and depth values in feet)
New
Mexico
Depth
Description
From
Well Location 22.20.14.440
Well Name
Phillips Owens
Well Elevation 4,180 feet
To
Thickness
State
#1
Lime and sand
0
Brown shale
15
Sand
68
Brown shale
69
Gravel, coarse
73
Brown shale
78
Gravel, round
85
93
Brown sandy shale
Gravel
130
Gray shale
136
165
Sand and gravel, water
Gray sandy shale
180
Sand and gravel
215
233
-Lightgray shale
Blue shale
238
253
Gray sandy shale
Blue shale
265
274
Brown shale
Blue lime and shale
318
Brown shale and sand
380
405
Sand and gravel, water
Brown shale
428
Sand
433
453
Sand and gravel
Brown shale and layers
of
525
sand and gravel
628
Gray sandy shale
Brown sandy shale and gravel685
Light brown shale
710
Light gray sand
790
Red gumbo
848
852
Hard red shale
864
Brown sand
Brown shale and black sand 906
935
Black sand and fine
Brown shale and some lime 937
950
Reddish brown shale
Reddish brown rock
982
998
Hard gray sand
Pink clay
1003
Gray lime
1004
Gray, brown lime
1006
1026
Reddish brown lime
1046
Red rock
1060
Red sand
1092
Sand
15
68
69
73
78
85
93
130
136
165
180
215
233
238
253
265
274
318
380
405
428
433
453
525
628
685
710
790
848
852
864
906
935
937
950
982
998
1003
1004
1006
1026
1046
1060
1092
1124
15
53
1
4
5
7
8
37
6
29
15
35
18
5
15
12
9
44
62
25
23
5
20
72
103
57
25
80
58
4
12
42
29
2
13
32
16
5
1
2
20
20
14
32
32
Petroleum
logs
Description
of wells in Animas valley, Hidalgo County,
(Thickness and depth values in feet)
From
Well Location 22.20.14.440
Well Name
Phillips Owens
Well Elevation 4,180 feet
Depth
New
Mexico
To
Thickness
1330
1350
1364
1366
1367
1369
1371
1390
1400
1405
1406
1407
1410
1413
1428
206
20
14
2
1431
3
1436
1438
5
2
State
#1
1124
Gray sand
1330
Red sand
1350
Red shale
1364
Dark shale
1366
Reddish brown shale
1367
Gray shale
1369
Gray to pink lime
1371
Gray, white lime
1390
Blue to gray shale
1400
Lime
1405
Brown sand
1406
Black shale
White to pink waxy shale 1407
1410
Red brownish shale
Red rock, streaks of lime 1413
Hard fine sand, re& streaks
1428
of lime
Coarse red sand, streaks of
1431
lime
1436
Red sandy shale
1
2
2
18
10
5
1
1
3
3
15
'
70
Petroleum
logs
of wellsmimas
in Valley, Hidalgo County,
(Thickness and depth values
in feet)
New
Mexico
Depth
Description
Well
Well
Well
From
TO
Thickness
340
344
700
340
4
356
385
1890
5795
6680
6860
6980
7130
7340
7404
385
1505
3905
885
180
120
150
210
64
920
1190
3930
4007
920
270
2740
77
70
2352
3788
5907
70
2282
1436
2119
Location 22.20.35.000
Name
Buffalo #1
Elevation 4,160 feet
gravel and Clay
muckblackCoal
Blue clay, gravel and cement
1
340
344
WellLocation
24.19.31.244
Well Name
Cockrell #1 Pyramid
Well Elevation 4,244 feet KB
. Surface-Quaternary ,
Giia Conglomerate?
'' Tertiary
volcanic rocks
'Escabrosa limestono
Percha shale
Montoya dolostone
El Pas0 limestone
Bliss sandstone
Precambrian
Federal
1
385
1890
5795
6680
6860
6980
7130
7340
WellLocation
26.17.4.434
Well Name
Powers No. 1 State
Well Elevation 4,377 feet KB
Surface-Quaternary
rock
Volcanic
mudstone
Mojado
Tertiary
intrusive
rock
1
920
1190
3930
WellLocation
28.17.18.232
Well Name
KCM NO. 1 Cochise StateA
Well Elevation 4,416 feet KB
Surface-Quaternary
1
conglomerate
Gila
70
Ringbone-shale, sand, felsite 2352
Mojado-quartzite,felsite
3788
(Thickness and depth
values
in
feet)
Depth
From
To
Description
Thickness
Well Location: 30.19.8113
Well Elevation: 4825'
Cockrell #1 State 1209
Well Name:
Agglomeration
Tertiary Volcanics; rhyolite,
welded tuff, ashflowtuff
0
-
480
480
480
-
2950
2470
72
APPENDIX D
Particle
Size
Analyses
73
C O ~ V I P O S I TDATA
~
SHEET FOR P A R T I C U - S I & EA N A L Y S I S
Sample No.
Analyzed By
T-2
Description of
K. O'RriPn
Date
?,l1FI!R7
Sample Very coarse to fine sand
Remarks Interval from
135 to 140 ft
I n i t i a l Sample deight
Classification (Polk)
130.5
g
Plotted on Figure 3 as curve # 1
Class
Wentworth
Weight
i
f
Totals 130.5
Cumulative
g
100.0%
i
I
!
!
I
74
COMPOSITS DATA SHEET FOR PARTICU-SIZE ANALYSIS
Sample No.
T-2
Description
Of
Remarks
Analyzed &f
Sa.!Uple
K. O'Brjm
Date
>,,1 F(:R7
Fine qravel to fine sand
Interval from 150 to 155 ft.
C l a s s i f i c a t i o n (Folk)
I n i t i a l Sample deight
115.6
g
Plotted on Figure 3 as curve # 2
Class
Weight
Mentworth
Cumulative
medium sand
Totals 115.6
g
100.0%
i
I
!
75
'a
COMPOSITZ DATA SHEET FOR PARTICLE-SIZE ANALYSIS
Sample No.
T-2
Description of Sample
Remarks
Analyzed By
Da'te 2/18/82
Fine sand to silt
Interval from 170 to 175 ft.
C l a s s i f i c a t i o n (Folk)
Plotted on
Class
K. O'Brien
I n i t i a l Sample Height
71-3
g
Figure3 as curve # 3
Wentworth
Cumulative
Weight
Totals 71.3
4
100.0%
i
I
76
COMPOSITi3 DATA SHEET FOR PARTICU-SIZE ANALYSIS
Sample No.
Analyzed By
T-2
Description of Sample
Remarkg
Interval from 180 to 185 ft.
Plotted on Figure
Class
Neight
I n i t i a l sample Weight
3
as
92.4
cumulative
( 9Percent
)
Percent
--
> - 1
qravel
-1 to 0
very coarse sand17.4
18.8
18.8
0 to 1
coarse sand
17.8
19.3
38.1
1 to
2
medium sand
13.2
14.3
52.4
2 to
3
fine sand
13.3
14.4
66.8
4
very
fine
sand
13.3
14.4
81.2
18.8
100.00
' Pan
I
I
4'
curve
# 4
Ventworth
Class
(8)
to
3
I
Date2/18/82
Very coarse to very fine sand
Classification (Folk)
r
K. O'Brien
I
silt
and
clay
i
17.4
1
I
-
i
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
i
I
!
!
1
i
I
!
i
!
I
1
I
./
!
!
i
i
!
I
Totals
92.4 9
!
I
I
1
tI
t
.
1
!I
100.0%
-
I
!
77
COMPOSITE: DATA SHEET FOR PARTICU-SIZE ANALYSIS
Sample No.
ofSample
Description
Remarks
Analyzed By
T-2
K. O'Brien
Date
2/18/82
Predominantly medium sand with coarse
to fine sand
Interval from 205 to 210 ft.
Initial Sample
Height
Classification (Folk)
81-1
g
Plotted on Figure3 as curve # 5
Wentworth
Class
Height
Cumulative
I
!
i
:
!
1
i
i
1
i
!
I
1
!
Median
1
iI
1I
I
I
1
i
!
!
L
I
72
I
1
1
I
1
i
i
;
!
4
i
I
I
!
:
!
:
t
i
i
I
1
1
I
I
I
1
7%
COMPOSITi3 DATA SHEET FOR PARTICLE-SIZE ANALYSIS
Sample No.
Analyzed By
T-I
Date
K. O'Brien
2/18/82
D e s c r i p t i o n of Sample Sand and gravel
Remarks
Interval from 210 to 215 ft.
Classification (Polk)
Plotted on Figure 3 as
class
Initial Sample
Weight
209.4
i%
curve# 6
Wentworth
Height
Cumulative
I
Totals
209-4 9
100.0%
i
I
!
79
COblPOSITZ DATA SHEET FOR PARTICJ&-SIZ,E ANALYSIS
Sample No.
~ - 1
Description
Of
Remarks
Sample
Analyzed 8y
K. 0
*
D a t e w R/W
Sand and a r a v e l
I n t e r v a l from 215 to 220 ft.
Initial Sample Height
Classification (Folk)
167.1
g
Plotted on Figure 3 a s curve # 7
Wentworth
class
vleight
I
i
c
1
I!
I
I
I
I
t
!
I
!
I
!
!
i
I
1
i
!
Cumulative
i
I
t
f
I
:
i
i
I
1
i
!
Totals
I
1
I
8
1
167.1 g
100.0%
i
I
I!
I
!
us.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
WATER
RESOURCES
NEW M E X l CO
'ALBUQUERQUE,
PROJECT
HOLE
NO.
7"
DIVISION
COUNTY
/J ;d&'/4 9
CAS I CKNESS.
NG
DEPTH-DRILLER
-In.
Ft.
to Ft.
. .
STATE
.fl
.&le$.
,
TH,I
to-F t .
Ft.
Diam. -In.
RANGE
CPS
5
In.
NO.
PEN
S.P.
I
OATEf'fsw
BORE S I Z E
1 2 , /48/
U.S. GGOLOGICAZ SURVEY
'
WA?E.R RESOURCES DIVISION
ALBWUERQUE,
co
NEW MEN
LOG HEADING
.VE 5
sEC.:.~
OWNER
PROJECT
7-z
HOLE NO.
DEPTH-DRILLER
LOCATION N O . Z i ' J . Z O ~ . L . 320
;
TWP. 2 2 5 . . R w ~ O c J
fi,Ai/ o '
COUNTY
STATE
I
.CAS ING
.
,
OPERATOR(S)/JU~,,~~C,,,
DATE
fl.#CK.
THICKNESS
M~y
I A,
IPS/
BORE S I Z E
I /
In.-
Diam.,
DEPTH-LOGGER
/o - 2
7
to-
Ft.
D i a r nF .t x. I n .
Diam.
In.
F t . to.
Ft.
Dlam..
In.
Ft. to
Ft.
Diam.
-I n .
F t . to-
Ft.
~ Diam.
In.
F t . to-
Ft
272
INTERVAL LOGGED
Ft.
:.
-
~'
ELEVATIONS KE.
(".L ,
LOG MEAS. FROM
MEAS.
FROM
DF.
GL.
TC.
TYPE
c , ~ LEVEL
. FLUID
DENS I TY
.RADIATION
NUCLEAR
1
CHANNEL
NO.
2
DEPTH
RANGE
CPS
5 In.
4
TIME CONSTANT
Sec.
LOGGING SPEED
Ft/Min
VERTICAL SCALE
Ft/ln
Ft.
Ft. to
Ft.
Lb/GalDRILLERS
Ft. to
Ft.
ELECTRIC LOG
REMARKS
5r.r
PERFORAT IONS
.
DEPTH
$f+.
. .
Ft.
RESlSTiVlTY
S.P.
/a 0
. '5
POSITION
Ohms
'
PEN NO.
MV
VERTICAL SCALE
Ft/ln
CALIPER
/o. 0
.
2
VERTICAL SCALE
Ft/ln
HORIZONTAL SCALE
In/ln
zz0
/o
/clt
PO
MLI
6
OTHER
zo
D I G I T A L RECORO
TYPE LOG
3
?o~Ydslr(, /@;*?a
SPAN
WATER LEVEL
.
;
Ft.
to
-
7
. .
DEPTH
.
RANGE
Ft.
. ..
US. GEOLOGICALSURVEY
WATER RESOURCES D I V I S I O N :
ALBUQUERQUE,
I
7; I
NO.
HOLE
PROJECT
,
NEW MEXl CO
/Jf
COUNTY
Ad/
a
CAS ING
DEPTH-DRILLER
In.
Diam.
DEPTH-LOGGER
)?L
LOG MEAS.
LEVEL
FLUID
DRILLERS MEAS. FROM
Ft.
Diam.:
In.;
Ft.
to-
Ft.
Diam,
In.
F t . to-
ELEVATIORS KB.
GL.
DF.
(, *.
~~
RANGE
CPS 5 In.
I
I
I
I'
I
'Ft.
Ft.
"
Ft.
to
.;
ELECTRIC LOG
4 DEPTH
3
2
1
Ft. t o
Lb/Gal
DENSITY
,
~
Ft.
.
Ft-' to -Ft.
-
NUCLEAR RADIATION
DEPTH
.Ft.
to.
it:
In.
Diam.
TC.
TYPE
(9'' L .
CHANNEL
' ' ~
Ft, t o
'
,
.
Ft.
SIZE
PERFORATIONS
.c .L,
FROM
BORE
to-
In.
Oiam.
I
TH ICKNESS
-F t .
D i a m . "In.
6 - / 7~
INTERVAL LOGGED
i Me$
STATE
I
.
I
F t..
REMARKS
.. .
1.'
I RESISTIVITY.
SPAN
Ohms
VERTICAL
CALIPER
POSITION
. ,
LOGGING
SPEED
Ft/Min
Ft/ In
SCALE
VERT I CAL
WATER LEVEL
I
I
I
I
I
,
- 1
Ft.
RANGE
I
o ~ eI n / l n
I
OTHER
DEPTH
D I G I T A L RECORD
TYPE LOG
HORIZONTALSCALE
Ft.
.
~~
.
. ~.
U.S. GEOLOGICALSURVEY
WATER
RESOURCES
DIVISION
ALBUQUERQUE,
NEW MEXICO
.*
-
HEADING
LOG
NE 5lJ
SEC.
OWNER
PROJECT
HOLE NO.
7" z
DEPTH-LOGGER
272
2 - 267
INTERVAL LOGGED
6 ,L
LOG MEAS. FROM
DRILLERS MEAS. FROM
Dim.
In.-
22
TWP.
I
COUNTY
Dim.
-I n .
Dim.
Ft.
In.-
ELEVATIONS KB.
RNG.
cyuL
/.d,/
STATE'
;-j
I
.,yl
I mch,
DATE
1
'
Ft.
Diam.
Ft
.
Didm;'
F t . to-
Ft.
Dim;
gf+
~
/2,,/98/
BORE S I Z E
I n . A F t .
: In.-
In.
.
to
T:D. -I%.
F t . to,
Ft.
F t . to
Ft.
PERFORATIONS
.
GL.
~
.
DENSITY
LEVEL.
TYPE FLUID
G
f i ,
THICKNESS
to-
320
2 0 ~O P E R A T O R ( S ) $ ~ ] ~ ~ ~ -
F t . to-
DF. TC
L.
LOCATION
N0.219.2OJ.
CAS ING
DEPTH-DRILLER
.
.
L.
,'
Lb/.Gal
F t . to
Ft.
Ft. to
Ft.
ELECTRIC LOG
NUCLEAR RADIATION
I
I
CHANNEL
NO.
DEPTH
,
RANGE
CPS
5 In.
2
3
4
REMARKS
DEPTH
Ft.
RESISTIVITY
Ohms
S.P.
MV
PEN NO.
VERTICAL SCALE
SPAN
CALIPER
POSITION
TIME CONSTANT
Sec.
VERTICAL SCALE
LOGGING SPEED
Ft/Min
HOR I ZONTAL SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
WATER LEVEL
Ft.
D I G ITAL RECORD.
TYPE LOG
Ft/ln
20
Ft/ln
In/ln
OTHER
Ft/ln
DEPTH
RANGE
Ft.
.
~
,
~~
U.S. GEOLOGICALSURVEY
WATER
RESOURCES
ALBUQUERQUE,
I
OWNER
HOLE NO.
PROJECT
SEC.
Diam.
'
LOG
MEAS.
FROM
MEAS.
b/Gal DRILLERS
DENSITY
6
!Tw. 22
~ - 2COUNTY
R
z0
272
z72
.dd) ;
6, L ,
6 . ~TYPE
FROMLEVEL
G
.
No.2Z5.ZOd.
I
F t . to-
L.340
~ O~P E R
~ ATOR(S)~~J~,,~
STATE
I OATEfl>r lF8/
AI. Me y .
/t,
THICKNESS
In. _ _ F t . to-
Diam. -In.
N
II /
CAS I NG
DEPTH-LOGGER
LOGGED
NEW MEXICO
LOG
HEADING
/V€ s
DEPTH-DRILLER
- INTERVAL
DIVISION
BORE SIZE
.'
Ft.,
Dim.
fn
Ft.
Diam.
I n . -Ft.
Diam.
In.
F t . to
Ft.
to.
Ft.
to
Ft.
. I
Diam.
ELEVATIONS KB.
FLUID
RADIATION NUCLEAR
In.
F t . to-
DF.
GL.
Ft.
.
.
TC.'
-
Ft.
PERFORATIONS
Ft. to
Ft.
F t . to
Ft.
ELECTRIC LOG
. .
U.S. GEOLOGICAL
SURVEY:
WATER RESOURCES D I V I S I O N
ALBUQUERQUE,
I
DEPTH-DRILLER
7
DEPTH-LOGGER
1
19 L
6 - /?L
INTERVAL LOGGED
,.
CAS I NG
D i a m . -In.
In.
-F t .
D
-In.
D ii aa m
m .. =In.
In.
Diam.
.
NEW MEXICO
to-
Ft.
F t . to-
Ft.
Ft.
Ft.
to-
.
A
ELEVATIONS
KB.
UID
DRILLERSF LMEAS.
FROM
TYPE
DF.
"
TC
GL.
I
5 In.
1
1
I.
2
POSITION
Sec.
LOGGING
SPEED
Ft/Min
VERTICAL
SCALE
LEVEL
In.
F t . to
D iam'.
In.
F t . to.
D iam :
In.
F t . to
I
PERFORATIONS
.
:
'Ft.
Ft.
F t . to
3
1
4
~
I
REMARKS
.I
rrrCv8dJcS
c f/.,
I
I
ELECTRIC LOG
I
DEPTH
Ft.
RESISTIVITY
Ohms
S.P.
PEN
MV
0
*
5-
-
NO.
VERTICALSCALE
2
zo
Ft/ln
CALIPER
0
L
VERTICALSCALE
Ft/ln
HORIZONTALSCALE
In/ln
OTHER
Ft/ln
Ft.
Ft.
5 0 0
/o.
TIME
CONSTANT
-WATER
,
,
d
f.
SPAN
YY
_"
DENSITY
Yf,S.
CPS
5
~
DEPTH
RANGE
. Diam.
.
NUCLEAR RADIATION
CHANNEL NO.
I
BORE S I Z E
.
I
LOG MEAS. FROM
1.
THICKNESS.
/cf G
DEPTH
1
-
Ft.
HOLE
~~
U.S. .GE,OLOGICALSURVEY
..
WATER RESOURCES D I V I S I O N
co
NEW MEXI
ALBUQUERQUE,
L OHGE. A D I N G
OWNER
SEC.
PROJECT
NO.
'
r-,z
TWP.
L O C A T IN
OO
N- d f s d
2:2
RNG.
/-];la/
),COUNTY
20vJ
DEPTH-DRI LLER,
CAS ING
Diam.
DEPTH-LOGGER
12
LOG MEAS. FROM
,
11,.
L.
-F t .
I
AI. ///I C f .
TH ICKNESS
DATEltk)r
12,/ f , g J
BORE S I Z E
'to-
Ft.
Diam:
.s% I n .
F t . to-
Ft.
Oiam.
In.
F t . to.
Ft.
Oiam.
In.
F t . to
PERFORATIONS
Ft.
0
F t . to
7 D Ft.
. .
2 73
INTERVAL LOGGED
In.
CvUt
OPERATOR(S) hlLlJSon
STATE
I
6 . 2 2 5 . ZOY
D i a m . -In.-
273
Diam.
ELEVATIONSD KB.
Ft-. $02
Ft.
In.,
F.
G.L..
DRILLERS MEAS.D EFROM
N SLI TEYV E 'LF L U I D T Y P E
;
GL. j
TC
.
--F t .
Lb/Ga 1
Ft.
to
Ft.
to
Ft.
ELECTRIC LOG
NUCLEAR RADIATION
DEPTH
Ft.
20
RESISTIVITY
S.P.PEN
NO.
VERTICAL
SCALE
/oo
20
Ohms
MV
Ft/ln
CALIPER
HOR I ZONTAL
.SCALE
ln/ln
OTHER
DEPTH
RANGE
TYPE LOG
G
~
.
~
~~
~~
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
..
WATER RESOURCES D I V I S I O N
ALBUQUERQUE,
PROJECT
NEW MEXl CO
rF2.
NO.
STATE
CAS ING
DEPTH-DRILLER
Diam.
DEPTH-LOGGER
INTERVAL LOGGED
,4- 2 7
'
In.
-F t .
A!.
/ye<
THICKNESS
DATE
M~rr
l'?,/98/
BORE S I Z E
5/17
' F t . t o $ D. F t .
to-
Ft.
Diam.
D i a m . _ _ I n . _ _ F t . 'to
-F t .
Diam.
In.
F t . to.
Ft.
.
Diam.
In.
Ft. to
Ft.
F t . to-
In.
Diam.
Ft
In.
0
PERFORATIONS
LOG MEAS. FROM
KB.
ELEVATIONS
LDRILLERS
b / G a lD E N SMEAS.
I T YL E V EFROM
L FLUID
GL.
DF.
TC.
-F t .
TYPE
to
Ft.
Ft. to
Ft.
ELECTRIC RADIATION NUCLEAR
1
CHANNEL NO.
DEPTH
4
3
2
REMARKS
272
5 In.
RANGE'
CPS
i7P,s;jv
~
Ft/Min
~~
VERTICAL
SCALE
WATER LEVEL
~
Ohms
S.P.
MV
NO.
Ft/l n
Ft.
~~
~~
~~~
~
~
Idln
~~
zo
OTHER
DEPTH
RANGE
L7ul r:
Drw.;, f u
Ft/ln
HORlZONtTAL
~
I4
In
SCALE VERTICAL
7-0
~
D I G I T A L RECORD
TYPE LOG
RESISTIVITY
CALIPER
z
Sec.
LOGGING
SPEED
~
!+
10.0
T I M E CONSTANT
~~
Ft.
VE
FStR/CT AI CL AE L
f.0
POSITION
/i
PEN
/o 0
SPAN
IMC"/r)JP*
DEPTH
Ft.
U.S. GEOLOGICAL; S U R V E Y
I
I[r
Z
0
3
0
t
n
P
Y
I
0
0
(D
e
0
0
dd-
0
0
e
I
ln
I
EPZ 6 0 2 92
0
0
e
e
EPV GI 02 92
EPE i 7 l 02 92
0
0
LC)
e
0
0
0
0
0
d-
0
-
d-
N
dI
m
I
0
0
-
I
Z Z E 9 02 Z Z
PEZ PI 02 ZZ
OPP PI OZ ZZ
000 SE 02 Z Z
PZP 6 OZ PZ
PIP El 02 PZ
OOP G Z 0 2 PZ
N
e
0
0
ZPZ 102 sz
PZI El 02 sz
IZZ El oz sz
/
0
0
rr)
d-
e
0
0
0
I
d-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
0
0
r)
m
0
0
0
m
m
0
0
dm
0
-
Ln
m
N
m
(D
m
F
m
00
m
I
6,
I
0
0
m
0
0
-
I
0
0
1
0
0
m
N
I
0
0
m
m
I
0
0
cz)
m
e
m
I
0
0
rm
Ln
m
I
0
0
00
m
I
0
0
6,
m
0
0
N
0
0
F
N
0
0
N
a,
c
-0
a
a,
\
C
0
v)
c
U
a,
I
E
i
N
cz)
0
0
(D
6,
N
0
0
00
rr)
0
0
0
I
-
a,
c
I
a,
c
\
v)
I
0
\
)r
0
M
Q
\
a,
a,
c
I
c
U
-
CY
0
CY
v,
c
t
U
>\
U
\
c
U
c
0
0
N
r-
0
C
z
CY
v,
0
v,
0
0
0
(3
N
N
v,
0
0
00
I
0
0
0
m
0
0
In
N
L n
0
0
cu
0
-
cn
I
(/>
cn
0
K
0
0