2023-11-28T07:25:20+03:00[Europe/Moscow] en true <p>Group</p>, <p>Formal Group</p>, <p>Informal Group</p>, <p>The Five-Stage Modelof Group Development</p>, <p>Role</p>, <p>Role identity</p>, <p>Role perception</p>, <p>Role expectations</p>, <p>Role conflict</p>, <p>Norms</p>, <p>Conformity</p>, <p>Deviant Workplace Behavior</p>, <p>Status</p>, <p>Impact of Status</p>, <p>Social Loafing</p>, <p>Cohesiveness</p>, <p>Encouraging Cohesiveness</p>, <p>Diversity</p>, <p>Effectiveness</p>, <p>Efficiency</p>, <p>Groupthink</p>, <p>Minimizing Groupthink</p>, <p>Groupshift</p>, <p>Brainstorming</p>, <p>Work group</p>, <p>Work team</p>, <p>Problem-Solving Teams</p>, <p>Self-Managed Work Teams</p>, <p>Cross-Functional Teams</p>, <p>Virtual Teams</p>, <p>Leadership</p>, <p>Trait theory</p>, <p>Initiating structure</p>, <p>Consideration</p>, <p>Production oriented</p>, <p>Employee Oriented</p>, <p>Contingency Theories</p>, <p>Fiedler Leadership Model</p>, <p>Leader-Member Exchange(LMX) Theory</p>, <p>Charismatic Leadership</p>, <p>Charismatic Leaders:Born or Made?</p>, <p>Charisma andSituational Dependency</p>, <p>The Potential Dark Sideof Charismatic Leadership</p>, <p>Transactional leaders</p>, <p>Transformational leaders</p>, <p>How TransformationalLeadership Works</p>, <p>Power</p>, <p>Dependency</p>, <p>Coercive Power</p>, <p>Reward Power</p>, <p>Legitimate Power</p>, <p>Expert</p>, <p>Referent</p>, <p>Power tactics</p>, <p>Most effective tactics</p>, <p>Politics arise in organizations because of</p>, <p>Politicking</p>, <p>Traits that encourage political action</p>, <p>Impression Management</p>, <p>the Effectiveness ofImpression Management</p>, <p>Conflict</p>, <p>Traditional View</p>, <p>Interactionist View</p>, <p>Managed Conflict View</p>, <p>Stage I: Potential Opposition</p>, <p>Stage II: Cognition andPersonalization</p>, <p>Stage III: Intentions</p>, <p>Stage 5: outcomes</p><p>Functional (Constructive)</p>, <p>Stage 5: outcomes</p><p>Dysfunctional (Destructive)</p>, <p>Negotiation</p>, <p>Necessary Conditions forIntegrative Bargaining</p>, <p>Forming</p>, <p>Storming</p>, <p>Norming</p>, <p>Performing</p>, <p>Adjourning</p> flashcards
MGT Exam #2 Flashcards

MGT Exam #2 Flashcards

  • Group

    Two or moreindividuals, interactingand interdependent, whocome together to achieveparticular objectives

  • Formal Group

    Defined by theorganization’s structure.Task force

  • Informal Group

    Neither formallystructured nor organizationallydeterminedBook club

  • The Five-Stage Modelof Group Development

    • Forming:• Uncertainty about purpose, structure, and leadership• Storming:• Intragroup conflict as members resist constraints• Norming:• Group is cohesive with strong group identity• Performing:• Group fully functional and working toward goals• Adjourning:• For temporary groups: breaking up

  • Role

    The set of expected behavior patternsthat are attributed to occupying a givenposition in a social unit

  • Role identity

    alignment of attitudes andbehavior with given role

  • Role perception

    our view of how we’resupposed to act in a given situation

  • Role expectations

    how others believe youshould act in a given situation

  • Role conflict

    conflict experienced whenmultiple roles are incompatible

  • Norms

    Acceptable standards of behavior within agroup that are shared by the group’s members

  • Conformity

    Members wanted to avoid being visiblydifferent (especially in unfamiliar situations)• Desire to fit inMembers with differing opinions feelextensive pressure to align with others• Tension, dissonance

  • Deviant Workplace Behavior

    Voluntary behavior that violates significantorganizational norms and, in doing so, threatens the well-being of the organization or its members

    Likely to flourish when.People are in groups. Supported by group norms

  • Status

    A socially defined position or rankgiven to groups or group members by others.Determined by. The power a person wields over others. A person’s ability to contribute to a group’s goals. An individual’s personal characteristics

  • Impact of Status

    High-status members... divas

    Interaction among members of groups isinfluenced by status

  • Social Loafing

    Causes:

    Dispersion ofresponsibility – cloudsthe relationship betweenindividual inputs andgroup output.Sucker effect. Free riding

    Preventions:

    Set group goals. Increase inter-groupcompetition. Engage in peer evaluation.Select members who havehigh motivation and like towork in groups.Distribute group rewardsbased on members’individual contributions. Individual accountability

  • Cohesiveness

    The degree to which membersof the group are attracted to each other andmotivated to stay in the group.Performance-related norms and cohesivenessinfluence productivity

  • Encouraging Cohesiveness

    Make the group smaller2. Encourage agreement with group goals3. Increase the time spent together4. Increase the status and perceived difficultyof group membership5. Competition with other groups6. Give rewards to the grouprather than to individualmembers7. Physically isolate the group

  • Diversity

    the degree to which members ofthe group are similar to, or different from,one another.Cultural. Demographic.Racial.Gender

  • Effectiveness

    Accuracy – group is better than average individualbut worse than most accurate group member.Creativity – groups are better. Speed – individuals are faster

  • Efficiency

    Groups are generally less efficient

  • Groupthink

    A deterioration of individual’smental efficiency and moral judgments as aresult of group pressures

    Occurs when members:

    .Rationalize away resistanceto assumptions.Pressure doubters to supportthe majority. Doubters keep silent/minimizetheir misgivings. Interprets silence as a “yes” vote

  • Minimizing Groupthink

    .Limit group size (≤10).Encourage group leadersto actively seek input fromall members and avoidexpressing their ownopinions.Appoint a “devil’sadvocate”

  • Groupshift

    Groupdiscussions leadmembers to assumemore extreme positions.Groups often takepositions of greater risk. May be due to diffusedresponsibility

  • Brainstorming

    Generates a list of creative alternatives whilewithholding criticism.Advantage: springboarding. Disadvantage: production blocking

  • Work group

    Interacts primarilyto share information and to makedecisions to help one anotherperform within each member’sarea of responsibility

  • Work team

    Generates positivesynergy through coordinatedeffort; individual efforts result in alevel of performance that is greaterthan the sum of those individualinputs

  • Problem-Solving Teams

    Members often from thesame department.Share ideas or suggestimprovements. Rarely given authority tounilaterally implement anyof their suggested actions. Often just makerecommendations

  • Self-Managed Work Teams

    Team takes on supervisory responsibilities:.Work planning and scheduling. Assigning tasks. Operating decisions/actions. Working with customers

  • Cross-Functional Teams

    Team compromised of people from different departments

    Members from same level, but diverse areaswithin and between organizations.Exchange information. Develop new ideas and solve problems. Coordinate complex projects

  • Virtual Teams

    Teams connected through technology

    enables andrestricts collaboration. Special challenges. Less social rapport. Diff to est. trust. More task-oriented. Members may be lesssatisfied

  • Leadership

    The ability to influence a grouptoward the achievement of a vision or a set ofgoals

  • Trait theory

    focuses on personal qualities andcharacteristics

    .Big Five Personality Framework

    . Focuses on emergence instead ofeffectiveness

  • Initiating structure

    Attempts to organizework, assign roles, andgoals (productivity)

  • Consideration

    Concern for followers’comfort, well-being,status, and satisfaction

  • Production oriented

    Emphasize the technicalor task aspects of thejob: people are meansto an end

  • Employee Oriented

    Emphasizeinterpersonal relationsand accept individualdifferences

  • Contingency Theories

    attempt to match leadershipstyle with work contextbecause one leadership styledoes not work in everysituation.Fiedler Model.LMX

  • Fiedler Leadership Model

    Identifying Leadership Style: Least-Preferred Co-worker (LPC) survey determines leadership style(fixed trait).Relationship- vs Task-oriented.Effective group performance depends on theproper match between the leader’s style and thedegree to which the situation gives the leadercontrol.Match leader’s style with degree of situationalcontrol.Leader-member relations.Task structure.Position power

  • Leader-Member Exchange(LMX) Theory

    Leaders treat followers differently.In-group members (clique).Close to leader in attitude or personality.Have more of the leader’s attention.Get special privileges.Have higher performance ratings.Lower turnover.Greater satisfaction.The Office!.While the leader does the (implicit) choosing,it is the followers’ characteristics that drive thecategorizing decision

  • Charismatic Leadership

    Gain followers throughpersonality traits insteadof power or authority.Key Characteristics:.Vision (compelling future).Personal risk-taking.Sensitivity toward followers.Help followers “catch” theemotions.Extraordinary behaviors

  • Charismatic Leaders:Born or Made?

    Charisma is attributed partially to geneticsand partially to training and experience

    Charisma can be created by.Developing an aura of charisma.Be optimistic.Be passionately enthusiastic.Communicate with body, not just words.Drawing others in – inspire others.Tap into emotions, be empathetic – bring out thepotential in others

  • Charisma andSituational Dependency

    Best used when:.Environment is uncertain or stressful.Ideology is involved.People are most receptive to charisma whenthere is a crisis.Most closely associated with upper levelexecutives

  • The Potential Dark Sideof Charismatic Leadership

    Use organizationalresources for personalbenefit.Remake companies intheir own image.Allow self-interest andpersonal goals tooverride organization’sgoals

  • Transactional leaders

    Motivate their followers in the direction ofestablished goals by clarifying role and taskrequirements.Do X, receive Y

  • Transformational leaders

    Inspire followers to transcend their own self-interests for the good of the organization.Good leadership incorporates BOTH

  • How TransformationalLeadership Works

    CreativityFollowers are encouraged to be more innovativeand creative

    .take risks, be in control.GoalsFollowers pursue more ambitious goals andhave more personal commitment to them.VisionEngenders commitment from followers andgreater sense of trust

  • Power

    The capacity that A has to influence the behaviorof B so that B acts in accordance with A’s wishes

  • Dependency

    Based on the available alternatives(control) and their desirability (significance)

  • Coercive Power

    Complies from fear of the negative results

  • Reward Power

    Complies due to desire for positive benefits

  • Legitimate Power

    From the formal authority to control and useorganizational resources

  • Expert

    Influence wieldedas a result of expertise,special skill, or knowledge

  • Referent

    Based onidentification with a personwho has desirable resourcesor personal traits.Charisma

  • Power tactics

    Used to translatepower bases intospecific actions thatinfluence others

  • Most effective tactics

    Rational persuasionInspirational appealsConsultation

  • Politics arise in organizations because of

    Conflicting interests, high demand.Limited resources.Ambiguity in decision making (“fairness”) -competition

  • Politicking

    Twisting facts to support one’sown goals and interests

  • Traits that encourage political action

    High machsHigh self-monitorsHigh need for power

  • Impression Management

    The process by which individualsattempt to control the impression othersform of them.

  • the Effectiveness ofImpression Management

    Self-promotion,ingratiation (flattering), andconformity work well

  • Conflict

    Process that begins when oneparty perceives that another party hasnegatively affected, or is about to negativelyaffect, something that the first party caresabout

  • Traditional View

    All conflict is harmful and mustbe avoided

  • Interactionist View

    Conflict is encouraged to preventgroup from becoming stale

  • Managed Conflict View

    Conflict is inevitable but weshould focus on productiveconflict resolution

  • Stage I: Potential Opposition

    Communication.Barriers exist.Too much or too little.Structure.Group size, age, diversity.Organizational rewards,goals, group dependency.Personal Variables.Personality types.Emotional

  • Stage II: Cognition andPersonalization

    Potential for conflict is actualized, comes tofruition.Parties “make sense” of conflict by defining itand its potential solutions

  • Stage III: Intentions

    The decision to act in a given way.Inferred (often erroneous) intentions may causegreater conflict

  • Stage 5: outcomes

    Functional (Constructive)

    .Improves decision quality.Stimulates creativity andinnovation.Encourages interest and curiosity

  • Stage 5: outcomes

    Dysfunctional (Destructive)

    .Group is less effective (in-fighting).Cohesiveness and communicationsare reduced.Leads to the destruction of thegroup

  • Negotiation

    Process in which two or moreparties exchange goods or services and attemptto agree on the exchange rate for them

  • Necessary Conditions forIntegrative Bargaining

    .Parties must be open with information and theirconcerns.Both parties must be sensitive regarding theother’s needs.Parties must be able to trust each other.Both parties must be willing to be flexible.Hard to do when only driven by profit (money)

  • Forming

    Uncertainty about purpose, structure, and leadership

  • Storming

    Intragroup conflict as members resist constraints

  • Norming

    Group is cohesive with strong group identity

  • Performing

    Group fully functional and working toward goals

  • Adjourning

    For temporary groups: breaking up