“The doctrines of Rizal are not for one epochs but for all epochs. They are as valid today as they were yesterday. It cannot be said that because the political ideas of Rizal have been achieved, because of the change in the institutions, the wisdom of his counsels or the value of his doctrines have ceased to be opportune. They have not.” Who said this?
Rafael Palma
“What is most admirable in Rizal is his complete self- denial, complete abandonment of his personal interests, to think only of those of his country... He heeded not his brother, not even his parents, beings whom he respected and venerated much, in order to follow the road his conscience had traced for him.” Who said this?
Rafael Palma
Dr. Jose Rizal Mercado y Alonso, or simply Jose Rizal (1861-1896), is unquestionably the greatest hero & martyr of our nation. The day of his birth & the day of his execution are fittingly commemorated by all classes of our people throughout the length & breadth of this country & even by Filipinos & their friends abroad. His name is a byword in every Filipino home while his
picture adorns the postage stamp & paper money of widest circulation. No
other Filipino hero can surpass Rizal" Who said this?
Esteban De Ocampo
The historian Ambeth Ocampo did not agree with the Jesuits belief that Jose Rizal did retract. true or false
false
Austin Coates believed that jose rizal did not retract. instead the document about rizals retraction is forgery.
true
This guy has a description regarding about the question of authenticity of the retraction document and signature of Rizal.
F. sionil jose
when and where was the retraction doc of rizal written?
Manila 29 of December of 1896
date when retraction document was ready for viewing
may 13, 1935
he found the retraction document
Fr. Manuel A. Gracia at the Catholic hierarchy’s archive in Manila
Fr. Pio Pi, a Spanish Jesuit, reported that as early as 1907, the retraction of Rizalwas copied verbatim and published in Spain, and reprinted in Manila. True or False
True
when did rizal signed the supposed retraction letter?
December 29, 1890.