Many investors give startup entrepreneurs this terrible piece of advice: “Your ideas are too small. You need to think bigger & go after a larger market. Otherwise you’re not worth my time or money. We only want to invest in entrepreneurs who are changing the world & doing something REALLY BIG.”
What a load of horse shit. That’s the WORST suggestion for a startup just getting started, when it hasn’t quite figured out product/market fit yet.
Yahoo and Google both started out as simple interfaces with a directory or index of web pages that <1% of people on the planet cared about.
Facebook started out with pictures of college students who Mark Zuckerberg wanted to try and get a date with.
Twitter started out as a stupidly simple notification app that posted 140-char status updates to a very small audience of geeky people. Most of them didn’t know why or what to do with it.
Uber started out with a crappy mobile app connecting a small number of San Francisco nerds with a few taxi drivers who weren’t total alcoholics.
Most startups build crappy initial products for a small audience of users or customers, and the product is usually so terrible at first that it *BARELY* solves the problem, and is hardly better than nothing at all.
In fact most startups can be incredibly mediocre & still be very successful.(sounds so inspirational, right? i know, but stick with me for a minute…)
But that’s exactly the point: If it’s crappy but still works and/or is useful, that’s a great sign… that means there could be a lot more potential ahead.
Most founders think they have to be AWESOME for EVERYONE to succeed. In reality, they only need to be BARELY FUNCTIONAL and BETTER THAN ALTERNATIVES for a SMALL AUDIENCE, long enough to survive until next sunrise. Then they can gradually iterate & improve.
The secret is to find your Niche — that initial <customer segmentation + product differentiation> combo that enables you to just barely beat your more established, mature competition with a much crappier product.
This strategy is called “Niche to Win”.In fact it’s a bit counter-intuitive, but the crappier you are but can still find Minimum Viable Product success...
...the quicker and better you’ll be at identifying initial customer-problem opportunities that create the possibility your still-tiny startup can stay alive & iterate one more day.
Ultimately, if you *do* want to become a bigger company, you’ll have to grow your market, change your product offering, & compete in multiple customer segments against those big incumbents — but in the first few months of existence, your job is simply to establish a foothold, to get an initial MVP out the door, and SURVIVE.
If that’s the goal, then focusing on a big, world-changing vision is EXACTLY the WRONG thing to do. Instead, narrow your field of view, find a very targeted demographic, and build a simple, crappy, focused solution that barely works, just well enough for that customer to pay for.
so in the slightly paraphrased words of Al Davis: “Just Niche to Win, Baby.”