Faculty
Progressive Dialogues
Monday, September 10, 2007
3:00-4:30 pm
Thursday, September 13, 2007
8:30-10:00 am
1
What is Your Vision
for USF Sarasota-Manatee?
2
Vision Statement
The University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee is an
indispensable asset in economic and human resource
development and a source of pride for all residents.
We have a vision to:
1. Develop centers of excellence that focus on the distinguishing
characteristics of our high-quality program offerings.
2. Be widely recognized in the South Tampa Bay region as the
premier source of quality programs for intellectual growth,
meaningful research results and an array of educational
opportunities.
3. Focus on students, creating a home campus environment in a
“university town” atmosphere, conducive to social, cultural and
leadership development as well as intellectual growth.
4. Align educational programs with the community's business,
economic and workforce needs.
5. Create an organizational culture that represents pre-eminent service
quality.
What is Our Competition?
4
Ten Schools in Analysis
Argosy University
Eckerd College
Everglades University
Florida Gulf Coast University
Hodges University
Keiser University
St. Petersburg College
University of Phoenix
University of Tampa
Webster University
5
Their Competitive Advantages
1. EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING CREDIT
Eckerd – external evaluation & portfolio
Florida Gulf Coast – Criminal Justice & in other areas
through credit-by-exam
Hodges – portfolio
St. Petersburg College – written/oral exams,
portfolio, interview assessment, project/product
evaluation
Phoenix – portfolio & essay
Keiser – Does not offer experiential learning credit, but
does consider credit taken at a non-accredited school on
a course-by-course basis.
6
Their Competitive Advantages
2.
ON-LINE DEGREES
Argosy
Bachelor’s in psychology
Master’s: MBA & educational/instructional leadership
Everglades
Bachelor’s: business admin, applied management, alternative medicine, aviation
tech/mgt, construction mgt, professional aviation.
Master’s: business admin, aviation science
Florida Gulf Coast
Bachelor’s (upper division): criminal justice, health sciences, legal studies, nursing
Master’s: MBA, MPA, health science, geriatric recreational therapy, curriculum &
instruction with concentration in educational tech
Other for K-12 Teachers: ESOL, Reading Endorsement
Hodges
Bachelor’s: interdisciplinary studies, paralegal studies, health information
Master’s: criminal justice, information systems mgt, management & public administration
Keiser
Bachelor’s: all programs they offer, including accounting, except elementary education
St. Petersburg College
Bachelor’s of Applied Science in: banking, dental hygiene, international business,
nursing, public safety administration, technology mgt, veterinary technology
Phoenix
All offered, except master’s of arts in education
7
Their Competitive Advantages
3. DEGREE OFFERINGS
•
Areas we have chosen not to offer
Science
Health care
Fine arts (Art, Music, Theater)
•
Areas for consideration
Banking
Communication
Construction management
Gerontology
Secondary Education: English, math, social studies
Spanish
Sports management
8
Florida Gulf Coast University*
On-Line Programs
Criminal Justice
Nursing
MBA
Reading Endorsement for K-12 Teachers
ESOL for K-12 Teachers
Experiential Learning Credit
B.S. in Criminal Justice
Other courses by taking oral, written, or practical
examinations.
*8% of our incoming students considered attending FGCU
9
Face-to-Face Degree Programs
70
60
50
61
57
42
40
33
30
20
12
10
11
9
8
11
3
3
0
M
S-
U
)
L
E
s
y
s
e
P
(
go
ad
SF
e
l
r
U
g
g
A
r
ll e
ve
o
E
C
d
er
k
Ec
CU
U
FG
H
s
e
g
d
o
U
@
M
TI
s
ei
K
er
U
C
P
S
U
pa
r
m
te
a
o
s
T
Ph
eb
of
W
U
ix
n
e
10
On-line Degree Programs
30
28
25
20
15
10
7
7
8
7
4
5
0
9
8
0
M
S-
0
U
)
L
E
s
y
s
e
P
(
go
ad
SF
e
l
r
U
g
g
A
r
ll e
ve
o
E
C
d
er
k
Ec
0
CU
U
FG
H
s
e
g
d
o
U
@
M
TI
s
ei
K
er
U
C
P
S
U
pa
r
m
te
a
o
s
T
Ph
eb
of
W
U
ix
n
e
11
Our Competitive Advantages*
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Accreditation
Adult Learner Program
Cost & Financial Aid
Faculty Quality
Hybrid Courses
Resources of Larger System
Retention
*That our competitors claim as their own!
12
Tuition Costs Per Credit Hour
Undergraduate
$600
$500
$425
$360
$250
$200
$100
$420
$405
$390
$400
$300
$490
$459
$116
$96
$77
$0
M
S-
U
)
L
E
s
y
s
e
P
(
go
ad
SF
e
l
r
U
g
g
A
r
ll e
ve
o
E
C
d
er
k
Ec
CU
U
FG
H
s
e
g
d
o
U
@
M
TI
s
ei
K
er
U
C
P
S
U
pa
r
m
te
a
o
s
T
Ph
eb
of
W
U
ix
n
e
13
Tuition Costs Per Credit Hour
Graduate
$600
$525
$500
$405
$390
$400
$300
$236
$443
$450
$490
$228
$200
$100
$0
U
SF
M
S-
y
s
o
rg
A
U
Ev
ad
l
g
er
es
U
FG
H
CU
s
e
g
od
U
@
M
TI
o
Ph
ix
n
e
U
of
pa
m
Ta
W
er
t
s
b
e
U
14
Undergraduate Retention Rate
100%
81%
78%
80%
84%
82%
77%
74%
60%
45%
40%
32%
20%
Source: NCES College Opportunities Online Locator
a
U
o
f
Ta
m
p
ix
en
o
P
h
H
od
ge
s
C
U
FG
Ev
e
rg
C
o
la
d
es
U
e
lle
g
U
sy
Ec
ke
rd
A
rg
o
U
S
F
S
-M
0%
15
Where Do Our Students Live?
16
Fall 2006
17
How Are We Growing?
18
Fall Enrollment:
Student Credit Hours (SCH)
15,000
+18%
12,000
9,000
6,000
-11%
3,000
0
Undergraduate
Graduate
Fall 2006
12,492
2,091
Fall 2007
14,787
1,854
19
Resident Faculty Growth
70
66
60
52
46
50
40
30
20
16
22
10
0
2001
2002
2005
2006
2007
20
Complete Programs
45
37
40
39
42
2006
2007
35
30
25
19
23
20
15
10
5
0
2001
2002
2005
21
What Do Our Students Want?
22
Fall 2007 New Student
Questionnaire
94% undergraduates responded (n=375)
Younger students tend to prefer morning classes
Older students tend to prefer evening classes
2 types of undergraduates to serve now
Younger students represent our opportunity for growth



We have classroom availability in the morning.
Younger students more likely to be full-time students.
Younger students more likely to be working part-time.
23
TIME-OF-DAY PREFERENCE*
50%
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS ONLY-ALL AGES.
Could choose more than one time.
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
% of Students
Morning
Afternoon
Evening
No
Preference
38%
30%
41%
13%
*From Fall 2007 New Student Questionnaire administered at Orientations.
24
TIME-OF-DAY PREFERENCE*
by College/School
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
CAS (n=108)
COB (n=92)
COE (n=79)
SHRM (n=10)
Morning
40%
36%
38%
50%
Afternoon
36%
25%
27%
19%
Evening
46%
42%
49%
19%
No Preference
6%
15%
13%
31%
*From Fall 2007 New Student Questionnaire administered at Orientations.
25
TIME OF DAY PREFERENCE*
by Age Range
70%
60%
50%
25+ Evening Preferred, but
Morning an option for 27-33%.
Under 25
Morning
Preferred
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Morning
Afternoon
Evening
No Preference
Under 21
(n=51)
21-24
(n=143)
25-29
(n=79)
30-39
(n=73)
40-49
(n=46)
50-59
(n=18)
45%
39%
24%
14%
41%
34%
34%
19%
30%
29%
49%
15%
27%
21%
64%
10%
33%
13%
57%
13%
33%
33%
61%
5%
12 students did not specify their age.
26
“Red Hot” & “Ice Blue” MCC Class Times
Percentage of Headcount Enrolled in Courses - Fall 2005
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
7:00 AM
4%
5%
6%
5%
4%
8:00 AM
13%
16%
13%
17%
12%
9:00 AM
25%
28%
25%
28%
22%
10:00 AM
24%
4%
26%
4%
24%
11:00 AM
22%
24%
21%
24%
19%
12:00 PM
21%
21%
21%
21%
17%
1:00 PM
11%
2%
11%
3%
7%
2:00 PM
7%
9%
6%
8%
2%
3:00 PM
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
4:00 PM
2%
1%
2%
2%
1%
5:00 PM
12%
15%
11%
15%
0%
6:00 PM
5%
3%
5%
3%
1%
7:00 PM
11%
13%
11%
12%
0%
8:00 PM
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Source: MCC Factbook, 2005-06
N=8908
27
Manatee Community College:
Our Main Feeder
Fall 2007: 75% of our new students
previously attended MCC
MCC’s MOST popular class time is morning.
MCC’s LEAST popular class time is evening.
28
When Did We Provide Classes &
How Did Our Students Respond?
29
Fall 2006 to Fall 2007 Comparison
Number of Courses vs. SCH
We had fewer morning classes in Fall 2007
but enrollments were higher.
We had more evening classes and
enrollments were higher.
We had more afternoon classes but
enrollments were about the same.
30
USF Sarasota-Manatee
Number of Courses by Time-of-Day*
100
+12%
80
+5%
60
-6%
40
20
0
2006
2007
Morning
Afternoon
Evening
33
31
62
65
85
95
*Undergraduate courses only.
31
USF Sarasota-Manatee
SCH Earned by Time-of-Day*
6000
+19%
5000
4000
3000
+<1%
+7%
2000
1000
0
2006
2007
Morning
Afternoon
Evening
1706
1829
3223
3234
4535
5387
*Undergraduate courses only.
32
FY08 BUDGET
33
Process of
Strategic Implementation
USF S-M Strategic Plan
2006-11
http://www.sarasota.usf.edu/ir/Strategic_Plan/Goals.htm
USF Strategic Plan
2007-12
USF S-M Alignment
& Implementation
2007-08
http://www.ods.usf.edu/Plans/Strategic/goals-strategies.htm
http://www.sarasota.usf.edu/ir/Strategic_Plan/Update_2007-08.htm
34
Progressive Dialogues
FACULTY ISSUES
Goal 1: Learner-Centered Campus
Faculty Professional Development & Workload
Goal 2: Learning Technology
Distance Learning Board
Goal 3: Niche Programming & Program Growth
Academic Programs
Goal 6: Assessing & Developing the Standards for
Enhanced Campus Autonomy That Could Support
Criteria for Campus Accreditation
Campus-Wide Assessment
35