Protecting Children from the Violence of Consumerism SUE L. T. MCGREGOR PHD PROFESSOR MOUNT SAINT VINCENT UNIVERSITY SUE.MCGREGOR@MSVU.CA WWW.CONSULTMCGREGOR.COM PANEL DISCUSSION AT INTERNATIONAL SUMMER COURSE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD UNIVERSITÉ DE MONCTON MONCTON NB CANADA JULY 2013 Article 19 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, with emphasis Article 19 states children have “the right to protection from all forms of physical and mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation... while in the care of parent(s), legal guardians (s) or any other person who has the care of the child. Such protective measures should, as appropriate, include effective procedures for the establishment of social programmes to provide necessary support for the child and for those who have the care of the child...” (UN, 1989, p. 7, emphasis added). Revised Article 19 for consumerism as a form of structural violence Children have the right to protection from the structural violence of a consumer culture and the ideology of consumerism while in the care of parent(s), legal guardians (s) or any other person who has the care of the child (especially their teachers and educators). Such protective measures include curricula focused on a critical pedagogy of peace, justice and non-violence to provide the necessary support for the child (consumer and labourer) and for those who have the care of the child. Consumerism versus consumption Consumerism is an ideology Consumption is behaviour informed by the ideology “a set of beliefs and values, integral but not exclusive to the system of capitalist globalization, intended to make people believe that human worth is best ensured and happiness is best achieved in terms of our consumption and possessions.” Consumerism is "economically manifested in the chronic purchasing of goods and services, with little attention to their true need, durability, origin of the product or the environmental consequences of manufacture, [usage] and disposal." As a concept, structural violence strives to account for the injustice, marginalization, exploitation, oppression, discrimination and other social ills that exist because of the way society has organized itself. Structural violence is almost invisible, embedded in the ubiquitous social structures, and normalized by stable, enabling institutions and by people’s regular experiences and patterns of living. Consumerism is a form of structural violence Features of Structural Violence Institutions and policies are designed in such a way that barriers are built into society leading to some people being harmed due to no action of their own. Because these social inequities are longstanding, they usually seem ordinary, the way things are done, and always have been; hence, they go unchallenged. The results are unequal power and unequal life chances. Structural violence leads to social inequalities, injustice, insecurity and infringement on human rights. Example of Structural Violence School is out at 3PM or earlier Parents (guardians) are working until at least 5PM Huge time gap! Consumerism as Structural Violence Consumption has become the cornerstone of most people’s daily lives - it is a social institution, defining daily patterns of living. It is almost impossible to buy a product without harming others, other species and/or the environment... BECAUSE….. of structure of the global economy and the consumer marketplace (product and service development, packaging, marketing, advertising, distribution chains, retailing). More on consumerism as structural violence It is unthinkable for most people that they are perpetuating the onslaught of human rights infringements, war, injustice, inner turmoil or ecological destruction when all they do is…. Unpeaceful consumption Consumerism as structural violence Who would have thought these innocuous, mundane purchases were underpinned by structural violence? But, they are. The labour behind the product or service, the intensity and externalities of production processes and the end-chain disposal issues create injustices around the world – especially for children! There are close to 2 Billion children. 215 million are child labourers while the world’s affluent children (3% of all the world’s consumers) spend upwards of $1.18US TRILLION a year Children as consumers and labourers both need to be protected from the violence of the consumerism ideology Children as consumers Children as labourers Children as consumers and labourers both need to be protected from the consumerism Children as consumers are very vulnerable because their cognitive processing skills are not fully developed. Their critical thinking, reasoned judgements, resistance to persuasion and manipulation, and ability to assign appropriate meanings to messages emanating from the marketplace are in question, and usually deficient Children as labourers are very vulnerable because they engage in work that deprives them of their childhood, interferes with their ability to attend regular school, deprives them of their potential and dignity, and is mentally, physically, socially or morally dangerous and harmful This paper focuses on the children doing the consuming, in hopes that their changed behaviour will have positive outcomes for the children labouring to produce goods and services. In a consumer culture, people are so indoctrinated into the logic of the market that they cannot see anything wrong with what they are doing. Because they do not (or cannot) critically challenge the market ideology and the myth of consumerism, they actually contribute to their own oppression (i.e., become slaves of the market), as well as the oppression of others. Turning on Cognitive Skills In order for children to “see” how their consumer behaviour is oppressive and exploitive, and to appreciate the structural violence shaping their daily lives as consumers, their cognitive skills need to be turned on and honed. Aside from their parents or guardians, who help socialize children to be consumers, the best persons for the task of enhancing critical cognitive skills are their teachers (critical thinking, rhetoric and argumentation, dialogue, debate and deliberation, as well as values reasoning) Steeped in a consumer culture AND – in order for educators to best embrace this task, they have to understand the challenges of educating for human rights and peace within a consumer society, which has market values at its core: competition, scarcity, materialism, wealth and profit, self-interest, efficiency, growth Youth and educators are BOTH steeped in this consumer culture. Once something is infused into something else, it is almost impossible to separate them again (like tea steeped in water). What is needed is a new infusion; students need to be steeped in a culture of peace, and as early as possible! The steeping process enables something to release its active ingredients. Culture of Peace, Non-violence and Human Rights active ingredients Everyday attitude of non-violence Fierce determination to defend human rights and human dignity Hope, persistence, solidarity, inclusiveness and morality will be the norm Principles of tolerance, open mindedness, sustainability, participation and democracy are paramount A global awareness and perspective, cooperation and a deep respect for interdependency are key features Responsibility and accountability are central values Mutual support, empathetic listening and unwavering respect Ongoing, rigorous critique of the ideological status quo (e.g., consumerism) The well-being of all citizens come before the self interest of the few Role of Educators Children and educators are steeped in a cacophony of consumer culture messages Need to be liberated from this ‘noise’ via critical education Protecting Both Spenders and Labourers In the spirit of Article 19, With refined cognitive skills, the educators need to accept that youth doing the spending can crawl consumerism is a form of out from under the oppression of structural violence and then the consumer culture, and challenge balance their curricula and the ideology of consumerism with pedagogy with insights from a alternative perspectives. culture of peace and non They will then ‘spend differently’ violence. such that the youth making the Educators also need to focus consumer products (child on educating the parents and labourers) are less likely to the guardians of the vagaries experience the fallout of the violence of the consumer culture so of consumerism. they can bring a different All children could then be protected perspective to their role as from the insidious, ubiquitous consumer socialization agents violence of capitalistic consumerism for their children. by being infused with the principles of a culture of peace. Revised Article 19 for consumerism Children have the right to protection from the structural violence of a consumer culture and the ideology of consumerism while in the care of parent(s), legal guardians (s) or any other person who has the care of the child (especially their teachers and educators). Such protective measures include curricula focused on a critical pedagogy of peace, justice and non-violence to provide the necessary support for the child (spender and labourer) and for those who have the care of the child. Protecting ALL Children from the Violence of Consumerism