The Internet in Developing Nations: A Grand Challenge Larry Press Professor, IS CSU Dominguez Hills A grand challenge: connecting the world’s rural villages Larry Press Professor, IS CSU Dominguez Hills http://som.csudh.edu/fac/lpress/ Measuring and Reducing the Digital Divide: a Grand Challenge Larry Press Professor, IS California State University, Dominguez Hills lpress@csudh.edu Background We have done Training Pilot studies ICT readiness assessments Conferences and workshops Outline Background Village applications and business models Backbone architecture and feasibility Project policies (lessons learned from NSFNet) Conclusion – G8 Outline A decade of activity Where are we? A grand challenge: connect all villages The NSFNet strategy Cabled and wireless technologies Why Bangladesh? Outline A decade of activity The NSF approach Architecture and feasibility Village models and applications Action plan – WSIS Outline A decade of measurement activity Time for action – a grand challenge: • Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every village in every low and lower-middle income nation. • 3 billion people • 3 million villages A Grand Challenge Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every village in every low and lower-middle income nation. 3 billion people 3 million villages Grand challenges I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to Earth. John F. Kennedy, 1961 That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind. Neil Armstrong, 1969 Grand Challenges I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to Earth. John F. Kennedy, 1961 That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind. Neil Armstrong, 1969 A Grand Challenge Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every village in every low and lower-middle income nation. 3 billion people 3 million villages A Grand Challenge Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every village in every low and lower-middle income nation. 3 billion people 3 million villages A grand challenge Connecting the approximately 3 billion people residing in 3 million villages of the developing nations within ten years. A grand challenge Connecting the approximately three billion people residing in three million rural villages of the developing nations within ten years. A grand challenge Connecting the approximately three billion people residing in three million rural villages of the developing nations within ten years. A grand challenge Build IP backbones providing highspeed connectivity to and a point of presence in every rural village in every developing nation within ten years. (There are roughly 3 million villages and 3 billion people in low and lower income nations). Possible ICT Grand Challenges Provide high-speed IP connectivity to all villages Provide access to all engineering and scientific literature and data sets at all universities A proposal The G8 just pledged to increase African aid by $25 billion per year. A portion of that increase should be used for a high-speed Internet backbone to and a point of presence in every African village. There are 3 billion people in 3 million villages in developing nations 1990s hypothesis Computer networks can improve the quality of life in developing nations at a relatively low cost Marginal impact increased by a lack of alternative ICT and transportation Raising the quality of rural life will reduce pressure for urban migration 1990s Hypothesis Computer networks could improve life in developing nations at a relatively low cost Marginal impact could be relatively great due to a lack of alternative ICT Raising the quality of rural life will reduce migration pressure This motivated 15 years work ICT measurement and readiness studies Pilot applications and business models Training Conferences and workshops Background Over a decade of activity We have done Training Pilot studies ICT readiness assessments Conferences and workshops Over a decade of activity Early hypothesis Experience with applications supporting those hypothesis E-readiness assessments 10 statistical/questionnaire methodologies 8 case study methodologies 137 nations have been assessed at least once 55 nations have been assessed at least 5 times 10 nations have been assessed at least 10 times DOI vs. average of other indices Correlation coefficient = .96 Average of other indices 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 10 20 DOI 30 40 Successful Applications Education Health care E-commerce Democracy and human rights E-government News and entertainment Where are we? Many applications have been demonstrated. The Internet is on the “radar screen” But the digital divide persists Capital is not available Early successes, still operating Education Health care E-commerce Democracy and Human Rights E-government Entertainment IP Connectivity, 2003 Income Low Lower middle Upper middle High World Population Subscribers Per 100 2,413 5,424 .22 2,393 69,762 2.92 331 12,150 3.68 961 216,069 22.48 6,097 303,405 4.98 Internet subscribers, 2003 Income Low Lower middle Upper middle High World Population Subscribers Per 100 2,413 5,424 .22 2,393 69,762 2.92 331 12,150 3.68 961 216,069 22.48 6,097 303,405 4.98 Cannot attract private capital Cost of 20 hours access as percent of average monthly GNI per capita Low income nations 246.4 Lower middle income 24.9 Upper middle income 8.6 High income 1.6 On the “radar screen” Every government is aware of the strategic importance of the Internet (risks too) On the “radar screen” Every government is aware of the strategic importance of the Internet (risks too) Mosaic dimensions After 10-15 years work We have evidence that the hypothesis is true The digital divide persists Capital is not available The Internet is on the “radar screen” – all governments recognize the communication-development link On the “radar screen” Every government is aware of the strategic importance (and risks) of the Internet Multilateral institutions – G8, World Bank, ITU, UNDP, etc are also well aware of the role of communication in development Time for action We have done ICT readiness assessments Pilot studies Training Conferences and workshops E-readiness assessments 10 statistical/questionnaire methodologies 8 case study methodologies 137 nations have been assessed at least once 55 nations have been assessed at least 5 times 10 nations have been assessed at least 10 times “State of” Annuals How to proceed? The NSF approach Architecture and feasibility Village models and applications Action plan – WSIS After 10-15 years work We have evidence that the hypothesis is true The digital divide persists Capital is not available The Internet is on the “radar screen” – all governments recognize the communication-development link Connectivity, 1991 Internet diffusion, 9/1991 Internet diffusion, 6/1997 Generic Digital Divide The “digital divide” persists We have done ICT readiness assessments Pilot studies Training Conferences and workshops Where are we? Many applications have been demonstrated. The Internet is on the “radar screen” But the digital divide persists Capital is not available Where are we? The digital divide persists Capital is not available Many applications have been demonstrated The Internet is on the “radar screen” An unconnected nation No national backbone network No residential connectivity No commercial application Character-oriented email and news primary applications Connectivity only in a few universities The US in 1989 On the “radar screen” Every government is aware of the strategic importance (and risks) of the Internet Multilateral institutions – G8, World Bank, ITU, UNDP, etc are also well aware of the role of communication in development Time for action On the “radar screen” Every government is aware of the strategic importance of the Internet (risks too) On the “radar screen” Every government is aware of the strategic importance (and risks) of the Internet Multilateral institutions – G8, World Bank, ITU, UNDP, etc are also On the G8 “radar screen” Established Digital Opportunity Task Force at the 2000 Summit Japan pledged $15 billion On the “radar screen:” WSIS Connect villages with ICTs and establish community access points by 2015 Nine other targets related to ICT On the “radar screen:” UN Millennium Development Goal In cooperation with the private sector make available the benefits of new technologies, specifically information and communications. Successful Applications Education Health care E-commerce Democracy and human rights E-government News and entertainment Village models and applications Three successful approaches in the village Corporate owner, single application “Franchise” centers State owned Many successful pilots Sustainable approaches to village Internet centers Corporate owner, single application “Franchise” centers State owned N-Logue rural Kiosk Remote medicine Remote veterinary Remote agricultural advice E-government E-mail digital photography desktop publishing Telephony Break even at $75/mo. YCC mobile unit Cuban Youth Computer Clubs 350 YCCs Geographically dispersed Education Games Email News YCC mobile unit E-choupal home page E-choupal services Login Weather Crop best practices Market related information Agricultural queries Suggestion box Farmer profile Government schemes News E-Chaupal ITC, an Indian conglomerate (agribusiness, infotech, hotels, etc.) Remote centers at agricultural hub locations Savings in logistics and middlemen Payback time 8 months to 2 years Using VSAT and a single application Early successes, still operating Education Health care E-commerce Democracy and Human Rights E-government Entertainment Education Youth Computer Clubs, Cuba http://www.jovenclub.cu/ Enlaces Network, Chile http://www.redenlaces.cl/ Health care Healthnet Satellife http://www.healthnet.org Healthnet in Nepal http://www.healthnet.org.np/ E-commerce Soviet Union: Relcom (96/391 commercial accounts, 9/91) Information Village research project www.relcom.ru http://www.mssrf.org/ Software export from developing nations E-government Democracy and Human Rights From Relcom during the 1991 Soviet Coup attempt: “They try to close all mass media. They stopped CNN an hour ago, and Soviet TV transmits opera and old movies.” “Yes, we already prepared to shift to underground; you know -- reserve nodes, backup channel, hidden locations. They'll have a hard time catching us!” Entertainment and connection to the outside world Many quips: quick-impact projects International Development Research Centre Information for Development Program, Infodev http://www.infodev.org/ Development Gateway http://www.idrc.ca/ http://www.developmentgateway.org/ Sustainable Development Networking Program http://www.sdnp.undp.org/ NSFNet approach and strategy Project policies – lessons learned from NSFNet An unconnected nation No national backbone network No residential connectivity No commercial application Character-oriented email and news primary applications Connectivity only in a few universities The US in 1989 The NSFNet Approach Developing nations challenge: Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every village in every low and lower-middle income nation. NSFNet challenge: Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every university in the United States. The NSFNet Approach NSFNet challenge: Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every university in the United States. Developing nations challenge: Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every village in every low and lower-middle income nation. The NSFNet Strategy Build backbone Fund connectivity (POP, router and link) Connect US higher education networks International research and education networks Users in control The NSFNet Approach NSFNet challenge: Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every university in the United States. Developing nations challenge: Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every village in every low and lower-middle income nation. The NSFNet Strategy Highly leveraged – ARPA and NSF $125 million Expert designers on temporary assignment Users in control – IP protocol implies decentralized funding and innovation The NSFNet Strategy Highly leveraged – ARPA and NSF $125 million Users in control – IP protocol implies design Expert designers on temporary assignment NSFNet – seeding the Internet Build backbone connecting key sites Fund connectivity and POP (router and a link) Connect US higher education networks International research and education networks First IP backbone – seeded the Internet NSFNet T1 Backbone, 1991 The NSFNet Approach NSFNet challenge: Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every university in the United States. Developing nations challenge: Provide a high-speed Internet link and a point of presence in every village in every low and lower-middle income nation. NSFNet – seeding the Internet Build backbone connecting key sites Fund connectivity and POP (router and a link) Connect US higher education networks International research and education networks First IP backbone – seeded the Internet The NSFNet Strategy Highly leveraged – ARPA and NSFnet $125 million total cost Users in control – IP protocol implies decentralized funding and innovation R&D project – expert designers on temporary assignment, not government staff Highly leveraged: Government funding ($million) Project Morse telegraph ARPANet CSNet NSFNet backbone NSF higher ed connections NSF international connections Cost .03 25 5 57.9 30 6 User control Universities designed their LANs Universities funded their LANs Universities trained their users Users invented applications – innovation at the edges of the network A “dumb,” end-to-end network – IP is a design philosophy as well as a protocol. NSFNet with regional links NSFNet Build backbone Fund connectivity and POP (router and a link) Connect US higher education networks International research and education networks Highly leveraged: Government funding ($million) Project Morse telegraph ARPANet CSNet NSFNet backbone NSF higher ed connections NSF international connections Cost .03 25 5 57.9 30 6 User control Universities designed their LANs Universities funded their LANs Universities trained their users Users invented applications – innovation at the edges of the network A “dumb,” end-to-end network – IP is a design philosophy as well as a protocol. Areas of expertise for GRNet Geographic Information Systems Local Geography Terrestrial wireless design and practice Fiber optic design and installation Network operation center design Network modeling and optimization Satellite research and practice High altitude platform research and practice Village POP configuration design Training for POP operation Design of solar and other power systems Spectrum politics and policy Mechanical design for radio towers Village telecommunication centers and applications Expert designers on temporary assignment UCLA MIT SRI BBN NSF Michigan Etc. NSFNet Build backbone Fund connectivity and POP (router and a link) Connect US higher education networks International research and education networks NSFNet Build backbone Fund connectivity and POP (router and a link) Connect US higher education networks International research and education networks Technologies Cabled Wireless today Wireless to consider Backbone architecture and feasibility Architecture and feasibility Fiber Backbone, Mesh, POPs Fiber where possible – follow the roads Use cable links where possible Use fiber wherever possible Wireless technology Today Soon VSAT Various terrestrial technologies WiMAX Worth investigating High altitude platforms LEO constellations GIS-based radiation modeling VSAT High-Altitude Platform Sanswire HAP Sanswire HAP 245 x 145 x 87 feet Proprietary lifting gas technology Outer envelope covered in film solar panels Solar powered electric motors Held in position using 6 onboard GPS units Desired altitude: 65,000 feet Line-of-sight to a 300,000 square mile area Controlled by earth stations on the ground Flight time: 18 months Sanswire progress May 2005: floating tests July 2005: joint venture to deploy five platforms in Colombia FiberAfrica 70,000 Km fiber core 30,000 Km fiber spurs Wireless to fiber Reach 400 million Walking/bicycling distance 1 billion dollars Daunting, but with precedents Cost context, $billion Manhattan project: 1.889 US Interstate Highway system: 128.9 Apollo program: 25.4 GPS: 8.3 through 1995, 21.8 to complete Baseball stadium: .581 B2 bomber: 2.2 US pet food: 10 per year G8 African pledge: 25 per year (new) Wireless technology Today Soon VSAT Proprietary terrestrial technologies WiMAX – may unify terrestrial wireless Worth watching High altitude platforms Constellations of LEO satellites LEO constellation Cost context, $billion Manhattan project: 1.889 US Interstate Highway system: 128.9 Apollo program: 25.4 GPS: 8.3 through 1995, 21.8 to complete Baseball stadium: .581 B2 bomber: 2.2 US pet food: 10 per year G8 African pledge: 25 per year (new funds) WiMAX may unify wide-area terrestrial wireless ? ? ? ? License free market innovation Mass production (carrier and user) Global regulatory conformity “Competition” from next generation Wi-Fi “Competition” from 3rd generation cellular “Competition” from new license-free bands WiMAX issues License free market innovation Mass production (carrier and user) Global regulatory conformity “Competition” from 802.11 “Competition” from 3rd generation cellular “Competition” from new license-free bands Sanswire HAP Sanswire HAP 245 x 145 x 87 feet Proprietary lifting gas technology Outer envelope covered in film solar panels Solar powered electric motors Held in position using 6 onboard GPS units Desired altitude: 65,000 feet Line-of-sight to a 300,000 square mile area Controlled by earth stations on the ground Flight time: 18 months Sanswire progress May 2005: floating tests July 2005: joint venture to deploy five platforms in Colombia Radiation modeling with GIS Wireless supplements VSAT Terrestrial wireless Worth investigating LEO constellations High altitude platforms GIS-based radiation modeling WiMAX – 802.16 Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access Three architectures Point to point Point to multipoint P to P or P to MP plus mesh WIMAX Promises Non line of site Up to 50 kilometers Up to 70 mbps 802.20 mobile applications Unique MAC, modulation, etc? WiMAX issues License free market innovation Mass production (carrier and user) Global regulatory conformity “Competition” from 802.11 “Competition” from 3rd generation cellular “Competition” from new license-free bands WiMAX may unify wide-area terrestrial wireless ? ? ? ? License free market innovation Mass production (carrier and user) Global regulatory conformity “Competition” from next generation Wi-Fi “Competition” from 3rd generation cellular “Competition” from new license-free bands WiFi and WiMAX are version 1 Moore’s Law FCC has noticed WiFi success NPRM, license-free 3,650-3,700 MHz 25 Watt EIRP NOI, license-free Smart radios and antennae “White space” TV channels Lower frequency FCC Wireless Broadband Access Task Force WiMAX Market Development BWCS Limited Wireless technologies to investigate LEO constellations High-altitude platforms Radiation modeling with GIS Why Bangladesh? Need is great Some positive points Great need Pent up demand: cable landing, poor telephone infrastructure (300k users) Poor people – great marginal impact Positive points Densely populated – reach with fiber Railroad right of way Power Grid Company Positive experience with micro-credit Government will 2002 Population Density/km2 Bangladesh India Sri Lanka Pakistan Nepal China Myanmar Bhutan 925 329 289 182 164 134 72 15 Grameen Bank Microcredit Grameen Phone, since 1993 45 million people in 30,000 villages $300 million with $44m after tax profit $2 daily profit is over twice BD average WEF Global Competitiveness, 2003-4 Network readiness index 92/102 National savings rate 34/102 Access to credit 46/102 Inflation 37/102 Local equity market access 35/95 Intensity of local competition 52/95 Government prioritization of ICT 43/102 Workshop goal Bangladesh backbone POP in every “village” “High speed” Use the NSF approach Detailed, funded proposal by WSIS Pondicherry Information Links E-readiness assessments 10 statistical/questionnaire methodologies 8 case study methodologies 137 nations have been assessed at least once 55 nations have been assessed at least 5 times 10 nations have been assessed at least 10 times Sanswire HAP 245 x 145 x 87 feet Proprietary lifting gas technology Outer envelope covered in film solar panels Solar powered electric motors Held in position using 6 onboard GPS units Desired altitude: 65,000 feet Line-of-sight to a 300,000 square mile area Controlled by earth stations on the ground Flight time: 18 months Cost context, $billion Manhattan project: 1.889 US Interstate Highway system: 128.9 Apollo program: 25.4 GPS: 8.3 through 1995, 21.8 to complete Baseball stadium: .581 B2 bomber: 2.2 US pet food: 10 per year Steps Begin with a pilot nation Design and implement the network using a team of experts Apply lessons learned to other nations Which pilot nation? Strong government support of telecommunication Open, competitive telecommunication market Open, competitive business practices and laws High level of poverty High level of literacy Dense population High-speed international fiber links Strong university programs in EE, CS, and GIS Varied climate and topography Bangladesh? + + + + + - Densely populated – reach with fiber Very poor Undersea cable coming Extreme climate Positive experience with micro-credit Government will not clear Low literacy rate Weak universities WiMAX issues License free market innovation Mass production (carrier and user) Global regulatory conformity “Competition” from 802.11 “Competition” from 3rd generation cellular “Competition” from new license-free bands Why Bangladesh? Need is great Some positive points Great need Pent up demand: cable landing, poor telephone infrastructure (300k users) Poor people – great marginal impact The NSFNet Strategy Build backbone Fund connectivity and POP (router and a link) Connect US higher education networks International research and education networks Highly leveraged -- $125 million Users in control Use expert designers Which pilot nation? Strong government support of telecommunication Open, competitive telecommunication market Open, competitive business practices and laws High level of poverty High level of literacy Dense population High-speed international fiber links Strong university programs in EE, CS, and GIS Varied climate and topography Steps Begin with a pilot nation Design and implement the network using a team of experts WiMAX issues License free market innovation Mass production (carrier and user) Global regulatory conformity “Competition” from 802.11 “Competition” from 3rd generation cellular “Competition” from new license-free bands Conclusion Okinawa G8 summit, July 2000 Focused on information and communication technology Billions of dollars were pledged (Japan alone promised $15 billion) Digital Opportunity Task Force was formed "to identify ways in which the digital revolution can benefit all the world's people, especially the poorest and most marginalized groups." A few reports and no action We have many of the needed skills -- what is the role/responsibility of AIS in developing nations? Action plan Network design for a pilot nation Deploy in the network in a pilot Planning for implementation in other nations. Implementation in those nations. Let us continue the conversation lpress@csudh.edu http://som.csudh.edu/fac/lpress