Onboard/In-Field Fault Detection and Diagnostics a Subcommittee of the Advanced Technology Committee of the Western HVAC Performance Alliance℠ Subcommittee Meeting 9:30am – 12:30pm (PST) April 18, 2011 Call-in: 712/432-0075 742911# weblink at: http://uc-d.na4.acrobat.com/wcec/ Committee Members 2 Abdullah Ahmed, Sempra KC Spivey, PG&E Anthony Hernandez, SCE Kristin Heinemeier, WCEC Brent Eubanks, Taylor Eng. Mark Cherniack, NBI Chris Scruton, CEC Matt Tyler, PECI Dale Rossi, FDSI Mike Brambley, PNNL Dale Gustavson, BBI Nathan Taylor, Sempra Derek Johnson, Pacific Sean Gouw, SCE Controls Dick Lord, Carrier Jerine Ahmed, SCE Jonathan Douglas, Lennox Sherry Hu, PG&E Vance Payne, NIST Glenn Hourahan, ACCA Warren Lupson, AHRI Gaps Approaches to Overcome Tool Availability 3rd Party Tools licensable or acquirable; OEMs have some capabilities Analysis shows it is cost effective Perception of Cost Faults May Not be Addressed Standards Need to be National No Method of Test Data on Incidence No Defined Levels for Detection Research: Understanding Maintenance Behavior Reach out to ASHRAE 90.1, 189, 32; DOE/CBEA SCE Method of Test, ASHRAE Std. Method of Test, DOE Method of Test? Need a research study Develop levels: ASHRAE Std. 3 >>Agenda 4 9:30 Roll call, review of agenda 9:35 Update on Proposal for Title 24 10:15 Method of Test Development: Acceptance Tests 10:45 Update on National Efforts – ASHRAE, DOE/CBEA 11:15 Demo of FDSI FDD Tool 12:15 Next Steps 12:30 Adjournment Proposal for Incorporating FDD in T24 IOUs (via CASE HMG/PECI) and PIER (via NBI/WCEC) are working together to develop a proposed new requirement. 5 Informal Workshops held in April and December 2010 Roundtable on FDD held in July 2010 Discussion at AFDD Subcommittee in December 2010 Discussion at AFDD Subcommittee in January 2011 PIER Report Draft in February 2011 Discussion at AFDD Subcommittee in March 2011 PIER Critical Project Review March 2011 Workshop April 8, 2011 Workshop April 27, 2011 Formal “45 day language” workshops in Apr-Jul 2011 Adoption March 1, 2012 Effective January 1, 2014 HVAC Controls & Economizing Code Change Proposal 5: FDD Currently a compliance credit in the performance calculation method Not required by Title 24 Credit toward complying with energy budget Transition to a prescriptive requirement Not required by Title 24 Sets the basis of performance standard 6 CA Utilities 2013 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes 4/8/2011 HVAC Controls & Economizing Code Change Proposal 5 SECTION 144 – PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR SPACE CONDITIONING SYSTEMS 144 (m) Fault Detection and Diagnostics (FDD) for Packaged DirectExpansion Units. All packaged direct-expansion units with mechanical cooling capacity at ARI conditions greater than or equal to 72,000 Btu/hr shall include a Fault Detection and Diagnostics (FDD) system in accordance with NA9 – Fault Detection and Diagnostics. 7 CA Utilities 2013 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes 4/8/2011 HVAC Controls & Economizing Code Change Proposal 5 Nonresidential Appendix NA9 – 2013 Appendix NA9 – Fault Detection and Diagnostics NA9.1 System Requirements The following sensors should be permanently installed to monitor system operation and the controller should have the capability of displaying the value of each parameter: Refrigerant Pressure: Suction Line, Liquid Line Refrigerant Temperature: Suction Line, Liquid Line Air Relative Humidity: Outside Air, Supply Air Air Temperature: Outside Air, Supply Air, Return Air 8 CA Utilities 2013 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes 4/8/2011 HVAC Controls & Economizing Code Change Proposal 5 NA9.1 – System Requirements The controller shall provide system status by indicating the following conditions: Compressor Enabled Free Cooling Available Economizer Enabled Heating Enabled Mixed Air Low Limit Cycle Active The unit controller shall manually initiate each operating mode so that the operation of compressors, economizers, fans, and heating system can be independently tested and verified. Faults shall be reported to a fault management application accessible by day-to-day operating or service personnel, or annunciated locally on zone thermostats. A performance indicator shall be provided, which will allow tracking of efficiency. The FDD System used shall be certified by the CEC and verified to be installed correctly. 9 CA Utilities 2013 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes 4/8/2011 HVAC Controls & Economizing Code Change Proposal 5 NA9.2 – Faults to be Detected The FDD system shall detect the following faults: 10 1. Air Temperature Sensor Failure/Fault 2. Low Refrigerant Charge 3. Economizing When it Should/Shouldn’t 4. Damper Not Modulating 5. Excess Outdoor Air CA Utilities 2013 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes 4/8/2011 HVAC Controls & Economizing Summary of FDD Products Currently available fault detection by OEMs (matches NA9.2 Faults to be Detected) Air temperature sensor failure/fault Low refrigerant charge Not economizing when it should Damper not modulating Excess outdoor air Currently available products by third parties ClimaCheck by ClimaCheck, Inc. FDSI Synergy by Field Diagnostics, Inc. Sensus MI, developed by Univ. Nebraska 11 CA Utilities 2013 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes 4/8/2011 HVAC Controls & Economizing Summary of FDD Products Third party products currently in development SMDS by PNNL Low cost SMDS by PNNL Low cost NILM by MIT Virtjoule by Virtjoule, Inc. 12 CA Utilities 2013 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes 4/8/2011 13 HVAC Controls & Economizing Cost Effectiveness ● LCCA for 6-ton RTU ● Installed cost for OEM solution is much less than $1600 - this is cost of third party solution w/much longer fault list ● Maintenance $ at 50% of expected for conservative estimate ● 75% probability of detecting faults with FDD Incremental Installed Cost Incremental Annual Maintenance, 6 tons PV of Annual Maintenance, 6 tons Total Incremental Cost, 6 tons $1,600 ($98) ($1,171) $429 PV of Energy Savings, 6 tons $2,172 Lifecycle cost savings $1,743 Benefit/Cost Ratio CA Utilities 2013 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes 5.1 4/8/2011 Acceptance Requirements FDD system installed by HVAC system manufacturer with factory calibration and documented testing Attach documentation and complete certification statement Verify that points are mapped correctly within the system No other functional testing required FDD system field tested Functional testing per below… 14 SCE FDD Project Series Project 1: Development of an FDD Develop FDD Test Method Performance Impacts of Common Faults (Single/Multiple) Choose and assess two highly ranked FDD Tools Comm. 5 Ton RTU Comm. 5 Ton RTU Res. 3 Ton Split Res. 3 Ton Split 15 Test Method for Commercial HVAC Packaged Units Project 2: Development of an FDD Test Method for Residential HVAC Split Systems Project 3: Laboratory Assessment of Retrofit Fault Detection and Diagnostics Tools on a Commercial HVAC Packaged Rooftop Unit Project 4: Laboratory Assessment of Retrofit Fault Detection and Diagnostics Tools on a Residential HVAC Split System Project 5: Evaluating the Effects of Common Faults on a Commercial HVAC Packaged Rooftop Unit Project 6: Evaluating the Effects of Common Faults on a Residential HVAC Split System SCE FDD Project Series Develop FDD Test Method 16 Performance Impacts of Common Faults (Single/Multiple) Choose and assess highly ranked FDD Tools Comm. 5 Ton RTU Comm. 5 Ton RTU Res. 3 Ton Split Res. 3 Ton Split Near-term Needs Establish technical advisory group Draft/review working test method Acceptance Tests/ Certification Tests Air Temperature Sensor Failure/ Fault Low Refrigerant Charge Economizing When it Should/ Shouldn’t Damper Not Modulating Excess Outdoor Air 17 Update on ASHRAE and DOE/CBEA Presentation to ASHRAE SSPC 90.1 Mechanical Subcommittee Presentation to TC 7.5 FDD Subcommittee Presentation to TC 7.5 Others to Contact: SPC 189, GPC 32 CBEA/DOE RTU Spec http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/alliances/rooftop_specification.html 18 Title: METHOD OF TEST FOR FAULT DETECTION AND DIAGNOSTICS IN UNITARY AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEMS Purpose: This standard provides a method of test for the performance of Fault Detection and Diagnostic (FDD) tools on commercial unitary equipment in the laboratory. The objective is to provide a method of test to define an FDD tool’s function. Scope: 2.1 This standard applies to unitary air conditioning systems. 2. 2 The test is a physical laboratory test on a particular combination of diagnostic tool and make and model of unitary system. 2.3 This standard applies to any on-board, after-market or hand-held functionality that detects and/or diagnoses problems that lead to degraded energy efficiency or capacity, increased maintenance costs, or shortened equipment life. 2.4 This standard provides a method of test to define an FDD tool’s function, not to specify how it should be implemented. 19 T24 Proposal DOE Spec Notes Recommendation Sensor Failure Sensor Failure/Fault (incl drift) Suggest DOE remove drift Air Temp. Sensor Failure/Fault High Refrigerant Charge High Refrigerant Charge Low Refrigerant Charge Suggest T24 split into two separate faults Compressor short cycling Compressor short cycling OK Compressor short cycling Refrigerant Line Restrictions/TXV Problems - Suggest DOE add Line Restrictions/TXV Problems Refrigerant Line Restrictions/ TXV Problems Refrigerant Line NonCondensables - Suggest DOE add noncondensables Refrigerant Line NonCondensables Suggest DOE combine Low Side HX problem - Suggest DOE add High Side HX problems High Side HX problem Capacity Degradation Suggest T24 add Capacity Degradation Capacity Degradation Efficiency Degradation Suggest T24 list this as a degradation fault (but don’t take double credit for it) Efficiency Degradation Not Economizing When it Should Suggest T24 add Not Economizing Not Economizing When it Should Damper Not Modulating Suggest T24 add Damper not Modulating Damper Not Modulating Excess Outdoor Air Suggest T24 add Excess Outdoor Air Excess Outdoor Air Low Ventilation Suggest DOE remove Low Ventilation - High/Low Refrigerant Charge Low Side HX problem High Side HX problem Efficiency Metric for Tracking or Comparison with No-fault Model Economizer not Functional or Optimized 20 Low Evaporator Air Flow Dirty Filter Low Refrigerant Charge Demo of FDSI’s FDD Tool 21 >>Next Steps Working Groups? Detailed review of HTSDA and related Action Items Develop strategy and recommendations for action and advocacy for Roadmap integration Next meeting: Week of May 30 (3-hour webinar) 22 Thank you! Mark Cherniack markc@newbuildings.org Kristin Heinemeier kheinemeier@ucdavis.edu Jerine Ahmed jerine.ahmed@sce.com Anthony Hernandez anthony.hernandez@sce.com KC Spivey 23 kcs7@pge.com