Lecture 1 The Principles of Microscopy • BMS 524 - “Introduction to Confocal Microscopy and Image Analysis” Purdue University Department of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine J.Paul Robinson, Ph.D. Professor of Immunopharmacology Director, Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories These slides are intended for use in a lecture series. Copies of the graphics are distributed and students encouraged to take their notes on these graphics. The intent is to have the student NOT try to reproduce the figures, but to LISTEN and UNDERSTAND the material. All material copyright J.Paul Robinson unless stated. Textbook for this lecture series in Jim Pawley’s “Handbook of Confocal Microscopy” Plenum Press which has been used extensively for material and ideas to support the class. UPDATED January, 2000 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 1 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Evaluation • End of term quiz - 100% grade Introduction to the Course • • • • Microscopy Fluorescence Basic Optics Confocal Microscopes 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories • • • • Basic Image Analysis 3D image analysis Live Cell Studies Advanced Applications Slide 2 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Introduction to Lecture 1 • • • • • Early Microscopes Modern Microscopes Magnification Nature of Light Optical Designs 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 3 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Microscopes • • • • Upright Inverted Köhler Illumination Fluorescence Illumination "Microscope" was first coined by members of the first "Academia dei Lincei" a scientific society which included Galileo 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 4 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Earliest Microscopes • • • 1590 - Hans & Zacharias Janssen of Middleburg, Holland manufactured the first compound microscopes 1660 - Marcello Malpighi circa 1660, was one of the first great microscopists, considered the father embryology and early histology - observed capillaries in 1660 1665 - Robert Hooke (1635-1703)- book Micrographia, published in 1665, devised the compound microscope most famous microscopical observation was his study of thin slices of cork. He wrote: “. . . I could exceedingly plainly perceive it to be all perforated and porous. . . these pores, or cells, . . . were indeed the first microscopical pores I ever saw, and perhaps, that were ever seen, for I had not met with any Writer or Person, that had made any mention of them before this.” 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 5 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Overview of discovery 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 6 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Early Microscopes (Hooke) 1665 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 7 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Earliest Microscopes •1673 - Antioni van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) Delft, Holland, worked as a draper (a fabric merchant); he is also known to have worked as a surveyor, a wine assayer, and as a minor city official. •Leeuwenhoek is incorrectly called "the inventor of the microscope" •Created a “simple” microscope that could magnify to about 275x, and published drawings of microorganisms in 1683 •Could reach magnifications of over 200x with simple ground lenses - however compound microscopes were mostly of poor quality and could only magnify up to 20-30 times. Hooke claimed they were too difficult to use - his eyesight was poor. •Discovered bacteria, free-living and parasitic microscopic protists, sperm cells, blood cells, microscopic nematodes •In 1673, Leeuwenhoek began writing letters to the Royal Society of London - published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society •In 1680 he was elected a full member of the Royal Society, joining Robert Hooke, Henry Oldenburg, Robert Boyle, Christopher Wren 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 8 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Secondary Microscopes • George Adams Sr. made many microscopes from about 1740-1772 but he was predominantly just a good manufacturer not inventor (in fact it is thought he was more than a copier!) • Simple microscopes could attain around 2 micron resolution, while the best compound microscopes were limited to around 5 microns because of chromatic aberration • In the 1730s a barrister names Chester More Hall observed that flint glass (newly made glass) dispersed colors much more than “crown glass” (older glass). He designed a system that used a concave lens next to a convex lens which could realign all the colors. This was the first achromatic lens. George Bass was the lens-maker that actually made the lenses, but he did not divulge the secret until over 20 years later to John Dolland who copied the idea in 1759 and patented the achromatic lens. • In 1827 Giovanni Battista Amici, built high quality microscopes and introduced the first matched achromatic microscope in 1827. He had previously (1813 designed “reflecting microscopes” using curved mirrors rather than lenses. He recognized the importance of coverslip thickness and developed the concept of “water immersion” 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 9 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Joseph Lister • In 1830, by Joseph Jackson Lister (father of Lord Joseph Lister) solved the problem of Spherical Aberration - caused by light passing through different parts of the same lens. He solved it mathematically and published this in the Philosophical Transactions in 1830 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 10 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Abbe, Zeiss & Schott • Ernst Abbe together with Carl Zeiss published a paper in 1877 defining the physical laws that determined resolving distance of an objective. Known as Abbe’s Law “minimum resolving distance (d) is related to the wavelength of light (lambda) divided by the Numeric Aperture, which is proportional to the angle of the light cone (theta) formed by a point on the object, to the objective”. • • Abbe and Zeiss developed oil immersion systems by making oils that matched the refractive index of glass. Thus they were able to make the a Numeric Aperture (N.A.) to the maximum of 1.4 allowing light microscopes to resolve two points distanced only 0.2 microns apart (the theoretical maximum resolution of visible light microscopes). Leitz was also making microscope at this time. Dr Otto Schott formulated glass lenses that color-corrected objectives and produced the first “apochromatic” objectives in 1886. 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 11 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Modern Microscopes • Early 20th Century Professor Köhler developed the method of illumination still called “Köhler Illumination” • Köhler recognized that using shorter wavelength light (UV) could improve resolution 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 12 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Köhler • Köhler illumination creates an evenly illuminated field of view while illuminating the specimen with a very wide cone of light • Two conjugate image planes are formed – one contains an image of the specimen and the other the filament from the light 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 13 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Köhler Illumination condenser Field iris Specimen eyepiece Field stop retina Conjugate planes for image-forming rays Specimen Field iris Field stop Conjugate planes for illuminating rays 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 14 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Some Definitions • Absorption – When light passes through an object the intensity is reduced depending upon the color absorbed. Thus the selective absorption of white light produces colored light. • Refraction – Direction change of a ray of light passing from one transparent medium to another with different optical density. A ray from less to more dense medium is bent perpendicular to the surface, with greater deviation for shorter wavelengths • Diffraction – Light rays bend around edges - new wavefronts are generated at sharp edges - the smaller the aperture the lower the definition • Dispersion – Separation of light into its constituent wavelengths when entering a transparent medium - the change of refractive index with wavelength, such as the spectrum produced by a prism or a rainbow 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 15 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Refraction Short wavelengths are “bent” more than long wavelengths dispersion Light is “bent” and the resultant colors separate (dispersion). Red is least refracted, violet most refracted. 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 16 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Refraction He sees the fish here…. But it is really here!! 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 17 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Control Absorption No blue/green light red filter 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 18 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Light absorption white light blue light 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories red light green light Slide 19 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Absorption Chart Color in white light Color of light absorbed red blue green blue green red red green yellow blue blue magenta green cyan black red red green gray pink green 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories blue blue Slide 20 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt The light spectrum Wavelength ---- Frequency Blue light 488 nm short wavelength high frequency high energy (2 times the red) Photon as a wave packet of energy Red light 650 nm long wavelength low frequency low energy 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 21 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Magnification • An object can be focussed generally no closer than 250 mm from the eye (depending upon how old you are!) • this is considered to be the normal viewing distance for 1x magnification • Young people may be able to focus as close as 125 mm so they can magnify as much as 2x because the image covers a larger part of the retina - that is it is “magnified” at the place where the image is formed 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 22 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Magnification 1000mm 35 mm slide 24x35 mm 1000 mm M = 35 mm = 28 p 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories The projected image is 28 times larger than we would see it at 250 mm from our eyes. If we used a 10x magnifier we would have a magnification of 280x, but we would reduce the field of view by a factor of 10x. Slide 23 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Some Principles • Rule of thumb is is not to exceed 1,000 times the NA of the objective • Modern microscopes magnify both in the objective and the ocular and thus are called “compound microscopes” - Simple microscopes have only a single lens 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 24 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Basic Microscopy • Bright field illumination does not reveal differences in brightness between structural details - i.e. no contrast • Structural details emerge via phase differences and by staining of components • The edge effects (diffraction, refraction, reflection) produce contrast and detail 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 25 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Microscope Basics • Originally conformed to the German DIN standard • Standard required the following – real image formed at a tube length of 160mm – the parfocal distance set to 45 mm – object to image distance set to 195 mm • Currently we use the ISO standard 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Object to Image Distance = 195 mm Mechanical tube length = 160 mm Focal length of objective = 45 mm Slide 26 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt The Conventional Microscope Mechanical tube length = 160 mm Object to Image Distance = 195 mm Focal length of objective = 45 mm Modified from “Pawley “Handbook of Confocal Microscopy”, Plenum Press 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 27 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Upright Scope Epiillumination Source Brightfield Source 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 28 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Inverted Microscope Brightfield Source Epiillumination Source 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 29 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Conventional Finite Optics with Telan system Modified from “Pawley “Handbook of Confocal Microscopy”, Plenum Press Ocular Intermediate Image 195 mm 160 mm Telan Optics Other optics Objective 45 mm Sample being imaged 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 30 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Infinity Optics Ocular Primary Image Plane Tube Lens Infinite Image Distance Other optics Other optics Objective The main advantage of infinity corrected lens systems is the relative insensitivity to additional optics within the tube length. Secondly one can focus by moving the objective and not the specimen (stage) Modified from “Pawley “Handbook of Confocal Microscopy”, Plenum Press Sample being imaged 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 31 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt Summary Lecture 1 • • • • • Simple versus compound microscopes Achromatic aberration Spherical aberration Köhler illumination Refraction, Absorption, dispersion, diffraction • Magnification • Upright and inverted microscopes • Optical Designs - 160 mm and Infinity optics 2000 J.Paul Robinson - Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories Slide 32 t:/classes/BMS524/524lect1.ppt