Algebraic-Maclaurin-Padè Solutions to the Three-Dimensional Thin-Walled Spherical Inflation Model Applied to Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms. J. B. Collins II & Matthew Watts July 29, 2004 REU Symposium OVERVIEW MOTIVATION “It is only through biomechanics that we can understand, and thus address, many of the biophysical phenomena that occur at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels”[4] METHODOLOGY Model intracranial saccular aneurysm as incompressible nonlinear thin-walled hollow sphere. Examine dynamics of spherical inflation caused by biological forcing function. Employ Algebraic-Maclaurin-Padé numerical method to solve constitutive equations. HISTOLOGY CELL BIOLOGY Cells and the ECM Collagen & Elastin[1] SOFT TISSUE MECHANICS Nonlinear Anisotropy Visco-Elasticity Incompressibility[2] The Arterial Wall THE ARTERIAL WALL[3] Structure – I, M, A Multi-Layer Material Model Vascular Disorders Hypertension, Artherosclerosis, Intracranial Saccular Aneurymsms,etc. Aneurysms MOTIVATION[4] Two to five percent of the general population in the Western world, and more so in other parts of the world, likely harbors a saccular aneurysm.[4] INTRACRANIAL SACCULAR ANEURYMS Pathogenesis; Enlargement; Rupture THE ANEURYSMAL WALL[5] Humphrey et al.’s vs. Membrane Theory Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Elasticty Modeling the Problem FULLY BLOWN THREE-DIMENSIONAL DEFORMATION SPHERICAL INFLATION r R, t R, t R Modeling the Problem [4] INNER PRESSURE - BLOOD 10 Pi Pm An cos(n t ) Bn sin(n t ) n 1 OUTER PRESSURE – CEREBROSPINAL FLUID Po (t ) p csf d 3 d A 2 dt 2 dt 2 2 2 Governing Equations Dimensional Equation ( R, t ) R 2 T ( R, t ) pR R, t 2 ( R, t ) R Non-dimensional change of variables c R c t, R , 2 HA A H Non-dimensional Equation A Acsf T p c H 2 2 d 3 d A 2 Pi d 2 d c Material Models Neo-Hookean Model W I1 I1 3 2 Fung Isotropic Model W I1 e Fung Anisotropic Model W I1 , I 4 e I1 3 k1 k2 I4 1 e 1 k2 I1 3 Model Dependent Term Neo-Hookean Model TH 2 3 1 5 Fung Isotropic Model TFI 2 2 4 2 2 1 1 e 4 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 4 9 Fung Anisotropic Model TFA TFI e 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 8 17 k2 4k 1 2 1 14 13 12 11 7 10 9 8 8 6 5 4 4 2 2 1 Algebraic-Maclaurin-Padé Method Parker and Sochacki (1996 & 1999) y f y , t y (a) y 0 A) Autonomous: f y , t f y B) Initial Condition set at a 0 C) f y is polynomial in terms of the y i y f y y (0) y 0 Algebraic-Maclaurin Consider y (t ) k 0 k1t k 2 t k 3t 2 3 y (t ) k1 2 k 2 t 3k 3t 2 4k 4 t 3 Substitute into y f y , y (0) y 0 2 y (t ) k1 2 k 2t 3k 3t f(y) f k 0 k1t k 2t 2 k 3t 3 Need only to determine the k j STRAIGHTFORWARD 1st 2nd y (0) k 0 y 0 2 f ( k k t k t ...) Calculate the coefficients, of t of 0 1 2 j (Not DIFFICULT since RHS is POLYNOMIAL) So can iteratively determine : 1 coefficient f , t 2 coefficient f , t 3 k 1 coefficient f , t 0 k2 k3 depends on k 0 1 depends on k 0 , k 1 2 depends on k 0 , k 1 , k 2 Programming Nuts & Bolts A) RHS f typically higher than 2nd degree in y B) Introduce dummy “product” variables C) Numerically, (FORTRAN), calculate coefficients of j t with a sequence of nested Cauchy Products a ai t i i 0 & b bi t i i 0 n d ab di t i i 0 where d n ai bn i i 0 Algebraic Maclaurin Padé 1) Determine the Maclaurin coefficients kj for a solution y, to the 2N degree with the (AM) Method 2N y(t ) k j t j j 0 then the well known Padé approximation for y is N PN (t ) j a t j j 0 N j b t j k j t j to O (t 2 N 1 ) j 0 j 0 N N j 0 j 0 j 0 j j j 2 N 1 k t b t a t 0 to O ( t ) j j j 2) Set b0 = 1, determine remaining bj using Gaussian Elimination Aij k N i j A N N kN k N 1 k2 N 1 k N 1 kN k2 N 2 k1 k2 k N b1 k N 1 b k 2 N 2 bN k2 N 3) Determine the aj by Cauchy Product of kj and the bj N N j 0 j 0 j 0 j j j 2 N 1 k t b t a t 0 to O ( t ) j j j n a n k j bn j for n 0, 1, ..., N j 0 4) Then to approximate y at some value t*, calculate N PN (t ) * a t *j b t *j j 0 N j 0 j j Adaptive time-stepping 1) Determine the first Padé error term, using 2N+1 order term of MacLaurin series N 2 N 1 j 0 k jt j j a t j j 0 N j b t j p2 N 1t 2 N 1 O (2 N 2) j 0 p2 N 1 k 2 N 1 k2 N b1 k 2 N 1b2 2) Calculate the next time step 1 2N h q w w i 1 i 1 p 2 N 1 qh h p 2 N 1 1 2 N 1 h h 2N k N 1bN 1 2N Numerical Problem Differential equation for the Fung model 2 2 1 12 12 2 2 d 4 2 4 3 2 4 2 2 1 1 e d 2 9 1 3 d [ cos sin cos sin 3 d 1 2 2 cos sin cos sin cos sin cos sin cos sin cos sin cos sin cos sin ] Convert to system of polynomial equations… Recast as polynomial system: y y 1 2 y2 4 p46 p17 p19 p20 p21 p22 p23 p24 p25 p26 p27 p28 p29 p30 p31 p32 p33 p34 p35 p36 p37 p38 p39 y3 p2 y4 3 p9 y5 4 p10 6 p8 y6 y2 y7 2 p11 y2 y8 4 p10 2 p11 4 p16 y10 y12 y11 y11 y12 y14 y13 y13 y14 y16 y15 y15 y16 y18 y17 y17 y18 y22 y21 y21 y22 y24 y23 y23 y24 y26 y25 y25 y26 y28 y27 y27 y28 y30 y29 y20 y19 y29 y30 y19 y20 y9 2 p11 (0) 1 (0) 0 Results Forcing Pressures Fung Isotropic Neo-Hookean and Fung Isotropic Fung Anisotropic(k2 = 1, k2 = 43) and Fung Isotropic RELATIVE ERRORS CAVITY RADIUS (=1.5) Order 4 8 Step Runge-Kutta Taylor Series Padé 10 0.529 E-1 0.761 E-1 0.474 100 0.106 E-5 0.226 E-6 0.182 E-6 100,000 0.104 E-11 0.298 E-12 0.163 E-12 10 0.128 0.177 100 0.240 E-8 0.255 E-14 1 0.152 0.902 E-1 100 0.121 E-9 0.279 E-14 1 0.999 0.344 E-11 12 100 Adaptive Step Size(n=12, n=24) Dynamic Animation Fung Model Dynamic Animation Neo-Hookean Model SUMMATION Solutions were produced from full three-dimensional nonlinear theory of elasticity analogous to Humphrey et al. without simplifications of membrane theory. Comparison of material models (neo-Hookean & Fung) reinforced continuum theory. Developed novel strain-energy function capturing anisotropy of radially fiber-reinforced composite materials. SUMMATION The AMP Method provides an algorithm for solving mathematical models, including singular complex IVPs, that is: Efficient fewer number of operations for a higher level of accuracy Adaptable “on the fly” control of order Accurate convergence to within machine ε Quick error of machine ε obtained with few time steps Potential room for improvement Acknowledgements National Science Foundation NSF REU DMS 0243845 Dr. Jay D. Humphrey – U. Texas A & M Dr. Paul G. Warne Dr. Debra Polignone Warne Adam Schweiger JMU Department of Mathematics & Statistics JMU College of Science and Mathematics References [1] Adams, Josephine Clare, 2000. Schematic view of an arterial wall in cross-section. Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, Cambridge University Press. http://www-rmm.cbcu.cam.ac.uk/02004064h.htm. Retrieved July 21, 2004. [2] Holzapfel, G.A., Gasser, T.C., Ogden, R.W., 2000. A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models. Journal of Elasticity 61, 1-48. [3] Fox, Stuart. Human Psychology 4th, Brown Publishers. http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/class/bio590/pictures/lect5/5.2.html. Retrieved July 25, 2004. [4] Humphrey, J.D., Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs. Springer New York, 2002. Questions?