Kyoto Univ. RIKEN Katsuro Nakamura (Kyoto University) 2012/ 2/ 13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 1 2012/2/13 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN Internal structure of a nucleon ~parton model ~ 𝑔1 𝑥 = 1 2 𝑒𝑞 2 Δ𝑞(𝑥) – discovery of Bjorken scaling law establishment of the parton model Bjorken 𝑥 : the momentum fraction of parton – total momentum fractions for each parton 𝑈: 𝐷: 𝑔 ~ 36%: 18%: 46% proton spin puzzle 1 1 ΔΣ + Δ𝐺 + 𝐿 = 2 2 gluon spin orbital quark spin proton spin – Deeply Inelastic Scattering (DIS) experiment – ΔΣ~25% !? proton (spin1/2) Acta.Phys.Polon.B33(2002)2813 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 2 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN SIDIS experiment DIS experiment DIS experiment – lepton-nucleon scattering – cannot access to gluon in leading order semi-inclusive DIS experiment – next leading order high pT hadron pair measurement open charm measurement difficult to constraint on 𝚫𝑮 effectively hep-ex/0612055 2012/2/13 not enough constraints Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 3 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN Polarized p-p collision experiment – direct contribution from gluon – 𝜋 0 measurement provides the largest constraint on Δ𝐺 Weak points of the 𝝅𝟎 measurement – large uncertainty of fragmentation functions – dependence on function form of Δ𝑔 modeling Diagram of pion production spin asymmetry of 𝝅𝟎 production gluon polarization in a proton using only DIS data PRL 103(2009)012003 using DIS + RHIC data Nucl.Phys.B 813(2009)106 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium x 4 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN 𝑨𝑳𝑳 𝑯𝒆𝒂𝒗𝒚 𝑸𝒖𝒂𝒓𝒌 ~ 𝝈++ 𝑯𝑸 − 𝝈+− 𝑯𝑸 ≡ 𝝈++ 𝑯𝑸 + 𝝈+− 𝑯𝑸 𝒅𝒙𝟏 𝒅𝒙𝟐 𝒂𝑳𝑳 𝒈𝒈 𝚫𝒈 𝚫𝒈 𝒈 𝒈 spin asymmetry of heavy quark production – the main reaction is gluon-gluon scattering – direct measurement for the gluon polarization distribution of Bjorken 𝒙 of gluons contributed to each reaction 𝒄, 𝒄 0.5 < 𝑝𝑇 𝑒 < 1.5 PYTHIA simulation – hard process validity of pQCD an ideal channel to measure the gluon polarization 2012/2/13 𝝅𝟎 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 5 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN measurement of the heavy quark at PHENIX – detect an electron from heavy meson decay D K 0 e e 0 D K e e single electron D K0 e e c c spin asymmetry of the single electron production – asymmetry of inclusive (Signal+BG) electron production ALLS+BG 1 S BG 1 D BG 1 S BG ALL ALL ALL D D D N esinglee D S BG : Signal Occupancy Ne singlee ALL – BG reduction for large Signal Occupancy is important for the measurement of the spin asymmetry 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 6 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN photonic electron dominant background PHENIX 05’ single e and BG cross section photon conversion background Dalitz decay rejected by HBD (shown in later) ( ) e e (in material) 0 0 ( ) e e photonic ~95% direct photon conversion small, but significant at high pT single electrons can be estimated by subtracting non-photonic electron from total inclusive electrons photonic electrons D e X Kaon decay background 0 K e3 : K e e ~ a few% of vector meson decay non-photonic electrons , , , J , e e at pT > 0.50GeV/c 2011/10/9 PHENIX Collaboration Meeting 7 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN Absolute Polarimeter (H jet) RHIC CNI (pC) Polarimeters PHENIX Siberian Snakes Spin Rotators LINAC BOOSTER Pol. Proton Source the world’s only accelerator for the polarized protons – bunch-by-bunch spin direction is different ALL R 2012/2/13 collision AGS 1 N RN PB PY N RN : a bunch of protons (~2 × 1011 protons) analyzed data proton-proton collisions at 𝒔 =200GeV integrated luminosity ~6.1pb-1 <beam polarization> ~ 57% L : relative luminosity Kyoto University GCOE Symposium L 8 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN polarized-p 100GeV polarized-p PHENIX : detector complex – pseudrapidity: |η| < 0.35 – azimuthal coverage: Δφ = 2× π/2 100GeV (DC + PC) – tracking & momentum reconstruction for charged tracks PHENIX detectors EM. Calorimeter drift chamber pad chamber e HBD RICH 2012/2/13 – electron identification (EMCal) – energy measurement for electrons & photons (HBD) – BG rejection for the electron measurement – this measurement is the first operation of the HBD – important detector for the measurement Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 9 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN photonic electron ( electron pair ) single electron p beam e CF4 gas HBD e D p beam 50cm e e pair mass ~ 0 B field ~ 0 HBD cluster charge distributions Hadron Blind Detector – gas Cerenkov detector read out with CsI evaporated GEM each histograms are normalized as integral=1(or0.1) – electron identification this analysis is the first time of physics measurement with HBD 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 10 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN reference charge distributions HBD cluster fitting charge result distribution N N ~70% electron scinti ~20% electron single electron events electron N merge 0.75<pT<1.00GeV/c electron analysis with HBD – estimate the fractions of single e clusters and merged clusters by fitting HBD charge distribution – reject merged clusters with HBD charge cut effectively Yield of single electrons accept Yield of single electrons is estimated with this method reconstructed electrons estimated single electrons 2011/10/9 PHENIX Collaboration Meeting 11 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN cross section of single electron production cross section of single w/ HBD electron production (this analysis) – good consistency with previous measurements different analysis method w/o HBD from previous (previous measurements) measurements – converter & cocktail method for 2005 and 2006 results 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 12 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN signal occupancy w/ HBD (this measurement) w/o HBD (previous measurements) Signal Occupancy: D – the important value for the asymmetry measurement – increase by about factor of 1.5 from previous measurements due to the HBD performance 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 13 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN spin asymmetry of single electron production – estimation of the constraint for ∆𝒈/𝒈(𝒙) from the result is on going now 2011/10/9 PHENIX Collaboration Meeting 14 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN Summary Spin asymmetry of single electron production is an ideal probe to measure the gluon polarization in a proton. A new analysis method for the single electron with HBD is established and confirmed its reliability. The new method increases the “Signal Occupancy” by a factor of about 1.5 compared with previous measurements The approach to the ∆𝒈/𝒈(𝒙) with the very clean channel is succeeded. Future Prospect estimation of constraint on ∆𝒈/𝒈(𝒙) from the result is on going now 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 15 Kyoto Univ. RIKEN Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 16 2012/2/13 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN Single Electron Yield – HBD cluster charge fitting 25% of merged clusters – HBD ring charge fitting – analysis cut ~ 6% Cross Section – MB cross section 9.7% – MB trigger bias 2.5% – acceptance x reco eff 8% – trigger efficiency 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 17 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN Sect2 South 21% (fraction-fraction)/fraction Sect2 North 28% Sect3 North 17% Sect4 South 38% Sect8 South Sect8 North 16% 14% Sect9 South Sect9 North 19% 31% Sect10 South Sect10 North 31% 40% Blue: definition in offline code slightly Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 2012/2/13 Red: ideal definition different 18 Spin Puzzle ~EMC measurement~ • polarized DIS measurement F2 A1 2 x(1 R ) 1 2 g1 ( x) eq q ( x) 2 q g1 – SLAC (1976, 1983) – EMC (1988) • quarks polarization is only 0.012±0.116±0.234 of the proton spin • (assuming Ellis-Jaffe sum rule) • current quark polarization – ~ 25% of the proton spin (SIDIS) 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 19 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 20 Generalized Parton Distribution (GPD) • GPD is all-inclusive distribution function of parton – PDF: momentum distribution of parton – FF: spatial distribution of parton • spatial x momentum orbital angular momentum definition: i d ix 2 2 2 e P' ( n 2) (n 2) P H ( x, , )U ( P' ) U ( P) E ( x, , )U ( P' ) 2M U ( P) d ix 5 ~ ~ 5 2 5 2 2 e P' ( n 2) (n 2) P H ( x, , )U ( P' ) U ( P) E ( x, , )U ( P' ) 2M U ( P) Q2 x Bjorken x 2P q 2012/2/13 2 t ( P ' P ) 2 Mandelstam-t light-cone vector n (1,0,0,1) nKyoto ( P 'University P) GCOE difference of longitudinal Symposium 21 momentum Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering (DVCS) e e q’ = q - Δ q x+ξ P x-ξ GPD Δ = P’-P P’ = P + Δ • DVCS amplitude measurement of GPD T ( P, q, ) 1 1 1 1 ( p n p n g ) dx 2 x / 2 i x / 2 i 1 i n 2 2 U ( P) U ( P ) E ( x, , )U ( P ' ) H ( x, , )U ( P ' )n 2M 1 i 1 1 p n dx 2 x / 2 i x / 2 i 1 2012/2/13 ~ 5 ~ 2 5 2 H ( x , , ) U ( P ' ) n U ( P ) E ( x , , ) U ( P ' ) U ( P) Kyoto University GCOE 2M Symposium 22 Model-dependent constraints on Ju and Jd • large model dependence • cannot refer about quark angular momentum contribution for the proton spin yet 2012/2/13 Su another model Kyoto University GCOE Symposium Sd 23 Kyoto Univ. / JSPS / RIKEN PRD 73(2006)032002 2012/2/13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 24