A TEAM PRODUCTION THEORY OF CORPORATE LAW Margaret Blair & Lynn Stout 1999 PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODEL Explanation of public corporation ownership Shareholders (principal) own corporation and hire officers (agents) Goal of corporation is to increase shareholder wealth Corporation law is used to reduce “agency costs” and maintain faithfulness of directors/officers (agents) to the principals E. Fama, Agency Problems and the Theor y of the Firm (1980) Advocated the separation of ‘management’ and ‘risk bearing’ roles Used insights provided by Alchian and Demsetz ( 1972) to establish agent and principal roles PRODUCTION, INFORMATION COSTS, AND ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION Published in 1972 in AER Armen A. Alchian (University of California, Los Angeles) Harold Demsetz (University of California, Los Angeles) What makes a team? The use of several resource types The product does not equal a sum of individual contributions Not all resources used by the team belong to one person Think about two people lifting a 100lb box Does each person lift 50lbs? Does one lift 75lb and the other 25lb? PRODUCTION, INFORMATION COSTS, AND ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION Shirking: A problem with the a team Fixed by using a “Monitor” Residual claimant Observe input behavior Central party common to all contracts Ability to alter team membership Ability to sell these rights (ownership) When does a team become a firm? When it is possible to increase production through a team When it is economical to estimate marginal productivity via observation A TEAM PRODUCTION THEORY OF CORPORATE LAW Blair and Stout (1999) refute application of Principal - Agent Model and corollary that corporations ’ primary goal is to maximize shareholder wealth Model applies to firms in general, but provides no special insights into public corporations Team Production Approach Where a productive activity requires the combined investment and coordinated effort of two or more individuals or groups Issues occur in form of ex ante (agreement) shirking and ex post (agreement) opportunism A TEAM PRODUCTION THEORY OF CORPORATE LAW Issues occurring under Team Production Approach circumvented by corporate law as a “Mediating Hierarchy” Formation of Public Corporation provides a hierarchy existing outside original production team All team members “agree to give up control rights over the output from the enterprise and over their firm-specific inputs” (i.e. to a BoD) No single team member is a “principal” having right of control Solves three primary issues with Team Production Approach: Convoluted information-gathering and decision-making Shirking and opportunism via principal-agent contracts Disputes between team members regarding allocation of duties and rewards A TEAM PRODUCTION THEORY OF CORPORATE LAW A public corporation is not simply a “bundle of assets” under common ownership, but rather a complex collection of agreements between team members working together for mutual gain: “A nexus of firm -specific investments.” Control over assets and outputs are mutually given up in order to reduce shirking and rent -hoarding via implementation of an internal mediating hierarchy A TEAM PRODUCTION THEORY OF CORPORATE LAW KEEPING DIRECTORS FAITHFUL Influences of Corporate Law and Culture Directors motived to do well if they want to maintain their positions Directors also motivated by desire to maintain reputations Corporate law limits ability of directors to serve their own interests Directors unable to appropriate corporate assets beyond established compensation Assumption exists that if directors cannot serve their own interests, they will serve the interests of their firm (Is this a valid assumption?) Corporate culture motivates directors to serve as fair trustees of firm Serves role of benevolent/trusted mediator implied in all contract theory MEDIATING HIERARCHY THEORY May only be a “second -best” solution to relegation of asset and firm output control Given certain constrains, a board of directors may offer substantial reduction in inefficiencies and rent loss Mediating Hierarchy Theory expands on legal view of corporation as a “nexus of contracts” (explicit and implicit) Highlights importance of team production dynamics within public firms Establishes tools to understand political nature of a corporation Explains role of BoD in determining firm focus on employees/shareholders