Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 11:30-12:30 e-mail: miljen.matijasevic@gmail.com Session 10 1. Revision of the last session 2. Legal Aid Civil Procedure in the UK 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Who are the parties in a civil procedure? What is the purpose of civil procedure? What are the possible remedies? What are the defendant's options upon receiving the claim? What do you know about the three regimes of trial? What is the difference between the inquisitorial and adversarial approaches? Unit 8 Answer the question with your partner: Equality before the law is a requirement laid down in the European Convention on Human Rights. Is that really the case in practice? Why (not)? EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW - implications: ◦ Everyone knows the law ◦ Everyone will be able to afford the same quality representation Two main needs: 1. obtaining good quality LEGAL ADVICE 2. being represented in a court of law (LEGAL REPRESENTATION) European Convention on Human rights – imported into English law in 2000 Principles in criminal procedure – everyone is entitled to: ◦ a fair and public hearing ◦ have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of their defence ◦ defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require In civil procedures: ◦ The aim is to ensure the litigant to be on an equal footing with their opponent (litigant – stranka u parničnom postupku) Legal Aid Act 1988 – brings together various systematic schemes of legal aid Candidates for legal aid were put through a means test, and the case itself through a merit test (means – sredstva; merit – meritum, glavni predmet spora) MEANS TEST – aimed at establishing whether the candidate is sufficiently financially disadvantaged to be eligible for legal aid MERIT TEST – the case is evaluated in order to establish whether it is relevant enough to receive public funding financially disadvantaged, adj. – poor eligible (for sth), adj. – meeting the criteria for sth This system did not function very well - a lot of money was being spent and a very low percentage of the disadvantaged was actually getting free legal aid As a consequence alternative voluntary services developed to deal with the ‘unmet legal need’ The legal aid system radically reformed by the Access to Justice Act 1999 Introduces new criteria and selection mechanisms Establishes the main authority for the organisation and provision of free legal aid: the Legal Services Commission (LSC) Set up as an executive non-departmental public body of the Ministry of Justice CONTRACTING In the earlier systems, any solicitor could provide legal assistance and then claim fees from the State Within the new system, only those legal professionals who meet certain quality criteria and then conclude a contract with the LSC can provide free legal aid. Contracted firms undergo regular quality audits, but are also provided training in areas of the law where free legal aid is regularly sought (homelessness, repossession of property, human rights, immigration and asylum, etc.) Funding for legal advice and representation available for: very expensive cases, judicial review (revizija sudskog postupka), claims against public authorities (tužbe protiv upravnih tijela), clinical negligence (liječnički nemar), housing, family, mental health, immigration and asylum means test may apply Funding for legal advice and representation NOT available for: personal injury claims, boundary disputes (sporovi oko međe), wills, defamation (kleveta), company law, etc. CDS provides legal advice and representation to people under police investigation or facing criminal charges Run by the LSC in partnership with criminal defense lawyers and representatives Makes contracts and employs attorneys directly to provide legal advice and assistance (Public Defenders) Defendants have the right to choose another legal representative, other than the public defender Cases in which the defendant is represented through CDS undergo a merit test, whose aim is to establish that the case is more than trivial Defendants undergo a means test Depending on the results of the test, in which a spouses’s assets and possible criminal assests are also considered, the defendant may be required to contribute towards the cost of the proceedings This is to prevent, among other things, defendants with assets acquired through crime from having access to free legal aid spouse, n. - supružnik assets, n. – imovina, sredstva “No Win No Fee” Defined as “an agreement with a person providing advocacy or litigation services which provides for his fee and expenses, or any part of them, to be payable only in specified circumstances”, i.e. only if the lawyer wins the client’s case Available only for civil cases, prohibited in criminal proceedings and virtually all family proceedings. Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 abolished the LSC instead, the Legal Aid Agency set up as of 2013 carries out similar work but no longer part of the Ministry of Justice greater independence in funding-related decision making equality before the law legal advice legal representation means test merit test eligible assets Legal Services Commission Legal Aid Agency contracting Conditional Fee Agreement ("no win no fee") provider – defamation – assets – eligible – judicial – claim 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. If it is established that a defendant in a criminal proceeding has substantial .............. , he or she is not .............. for free legal aid. Unhappy with the court’s decision, Mr. Caulfield filed for .............. review. The Legal Services Commission concludes contracts with various .............. of legal assistance and representation, ranging from voluntary organisations to large law firms. Marion Kirby thought the article published about her contained information damaging to her reputation, so she decided to file a .............. lawsuit against the author of the article. In the past, legal aid could be obtained from any solicitor, who would then .............. their fees from the State. provider – defamation – assets – eligible – judicial – claim 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. If it is established that a defendant in a criminal proceeding has substantial ASSETS, he or she is not ELIGIBLE for free legal aid. Unhappy with the court’s decision, Mr. Caulfield filed for JUDICIAL review. The Legal Services Commission concludes contracts with various PROVIDERS of legal assistance and representation, ranging from voluntary organisations to large law firms. Marion Kirby thought the article published about her contained information damaging to her reputation, so she decided to file a DEFAMATION lawsuit against the author of the article. In the past, legal aid could be obtained from any solicitor, who would then CLAIM their fees from the State. Thank you for your attention!