Focusing and Space-Charge Compensation of Beams with Electron Columns Kathrin Schulte Institute for Applied Physics NonNeutral Plasma Physics Group Goethe University Frankfurt FCC Week 2015 Washington DC, 23-27 March 2015 1. Electron Trap 1947 D. Gabor +V 2.0e14 80e3 1.5e14 60e3 E / Vm-1 Important Features: • applied magnetic field and potential are used for electron confinement solely • strong electrostatic focusing • space-charge compensation • controlled electron distribution ne / m-3 electron column 1.0e14 40e3 20e3 0.5e14 0 0 0 20 40 r / mm 60 80 0 20 40 r / mm 60 80 2. Focusing – Experiments Target Chamber Transport Beam Line of H-mode Test LINAC (HTL) at IAP Deflector Ion Source Gabor Lens Gabor Lens High Current Test Injector (HOSTI) at GSI Ion Source Emittance Scanner High Voltage Gap Gabor Lens Planned connection to IH-RFQ 2. Focusing – Results Emittance Dominated Beam Transport: measurement - output measurement - input 40 y’ / mrad 20 Gabor lens parameters: FA= 0 kV Bz= 0 mT -20 -40 -60 erms,n= 0.166 mm mrad beam parameters: He+ I = 3 mA Wb = 50.3 keV 60 40 20 y’ / mrad beam parameters: He+ I = 3 mA Wb = 50.3 keV 60 Gabor lens parameters: FA= 20 kV Bz= 10.8 mT -20 -40 -60 erms,n= 0.321 mm mrad Space-Charge Dominated Beam Transport: measurement - output measurement - input beam parameters: Ar+ I = 30 mA Wb = 124 keV 40 y’ / mrad 20 -20 -40 -60 erms,n= 0.170 mm mrad -40 -20 y / mm 20 40 Gabor lens parameters: FA= 0 kV Bz= 0 mT beam parameters: Ar+ I = 35 mA Wb = 124 keV 60 40 20 y’ / mrad 60 -20 -40 -60 erms,n= 0.236 mm mrad -40 -20 y / mm 20 40 Gabor lens parameters: FA= 9.8 kV Bz= 10.8 mT 3. Space-Charge Compensation Space-Charge Compensation (SCC) in Intense Ion Beams Under the Influence of Beam Optics Impact of compensation electron (CE) distribution on measured phase space distribution CE distribution according to superposition of magnetic field strength and beam potential Magnetostatic Quadrupole adjustable CE distribution due to the confinement conditions Superconducting Solenoid Gabor Lens 60 40 y’ / mrad 20 -20 -40 -60 -40 @ Virtual National Laboratory for Heavy Ion Fusion K+ I = 190 mA Wb = 1 MeV K = 7.71 10-4 -20 y / mm 20 40 @ R. Hollinger, GSI Ta3+ I = 50 mA Wb = 0.132 MeV K = 5.25 10-3 Ar+ I = 35 mA Wb = 0.124 MeV K = 3.29 10-3 3. Space-Charge Compensation Studies of Space-Charge Compensation in IOTA (FNAL) space-charge effects studies and compensation experiments with 2.5 MeV protons at IOTA Electron beam (Tevatron e-lens as an example): Shiltsev et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11, 103501 (2008) Static electron column: 2.5-MeV circulating p-beam G. Stancari, FERMILAB-CONF-14-314-APC In collaboration with: M. Chung, V. Shiltsev, G. Stancari, J.C. Thangaraj, A. Valishev using BPMs as electrode system 4. Ongoing Activities – SC Gabor Lens Gabor Lens Filling Scheme under XHV - Conditions Beam optics for SC LINACs Reduced risk of quenching due to reduced magnetic field strength Cold emitter as an e-source Courtesy of F. Odorici, INFN Bologna Prof. H. Podlech CNT Ion Beam SC – Gabor Lens SC – Cavity (DTL) 4. Ongoing Activities – Bunch Merging In collaboration with Prof. H. Podlech Neutralized Merging of Bunch Trains by Gabor Lens two beam RFQ Gabor Lens ion sources Ion sources & LEBTs merging & LEBT‘s Shift of beam axis behind electron column at t = 75 ms bunching and acceleration deflector Gabor lens merging matching Two separted bunch trains at Crossover under full space the exit of the RFQ charge w/o e-column y y x x He+ I = ~ 1 mA (each) Wb = 0.18 MeV f = 54 MHz bunch spacing 6 ns tbunch = 3 ns 4. Ongoing Activities – Diagnostics Investigation of Electron Column Frequency Spectrum and RF-Response RF-pick up beam antenna e-column 5. Summary Studies of 1. Electron column properties and dynamics • Production and loss processes equilibrium state 2. Interaction with beam • Space-charge compensation / effects • instabilities 3. Non-invasive diagnostics (also during beam interaction) Thank you for your attention! In the name of the Frankfurt NNP group: A. Ates, C. Beberweil, M. Droba, S. Klaproth, D. Noll, O. Meusel, P. Schneider, H. Niebuhr, O. Payir, J. Wagner, C. Wiesner, K. Zerbe My special thanks go to all members of the GSI ion source group and all colleagues from the FNAL Accelerator Physics Center. 4. Numerics • GaborM by J. Pozimski & O. Meusel – fluid description – steady state er 2 Bz2 FA 8me • GabLensM2 by M. Droba – 3D PIC code – kinetic description – dynamic processes • bender by D. Noll – 3D PIC code – kinetic description – ionization of residual gas and secondary electrons on surfaces implemented State of the plasma column after 140 μs, U=9.8 kV, B=10.8 mT, 1e-3 Pa Ar+