Review for Final Exam Exam Format 25-35 multiple choice questions Three essay questions from a choice of five Five essay choices from following list of nine general topics Essay questions 1) Skepticism. What can you know? 2) Applying a system of ethics (i.e. virtue ethics, Kantian ethics and/or utilitarianism) to a concrete moral dilemma, and evaluating the system of ethics. 3) A discussion of a controversial topic where protectionism conflicts with rights, e.g. euthansia, recreational drug use. 4) Personhood: what gets to count as a person. Evaluation of some controversial cases, e.g. apes. 5) Animal rights: a question of the rights and wrongs of an animal rights issue, e.g. vegetarianism, animal experimentation. Essay questions 6) Dualism vs. materialism about the mind. Which do you believe is more plausible and why? 7) The meaning of life. Can life be meaningful? Under what circumstances? Evaluation of some particular circumstances. 8) Free Will. Do we have free will? Comparison of different theories. 9) Time travel. What are the potential logical problems involved? Do they make time travel impossible? Skepticism Plato’s cave Spectrum of reality Shadows,reflections/ordinary objects/Forms, Reality Descartes Radical skepticism Dream argument Evil demon hypothesis I think therefore I am Thoughts, ideas and perceptions are real Maybe the external world is not real Brain-in-a-vat The Matrix A simulated world Morality and Ethics Plato’s Euthyphro argument against “morality comes from God” Aristotle Virtue ethics Eudomonia The virtues Kant Rule-based ethics The categorical imperative The principle of universalizability Absolute moral duties Independent of consequences Never treat a person as just a means, but always as an end Morality and Ethics (cont.) Mill Utilititarian ethics Consequentialist Intrinsic good Instrumental good Happiness and the absence of suffering are the only intrinsic goods “the greatest good for the greatest number” Act utilitarianism Preference utilitarianism Rule utilitarianism Trolley case Transplant case Paternalism vs. Individual Rights Paternalism Individual rights The harm principle Free speech Euthanasia Smoking in public places Personhood Personhood “Persons” Candidates for personhood Moral agents (Kant) Morally responsible vs. morally considerable Apes as persons Reciprocal rights Animal rights Indirect vs. direct duties to animals Vegetarianism vivisection Peter Singer Ethics evolving to include animals Speciesism Sentience Vague line (perhaps between a clam and a shrimp) The argument from borderline cases Individuals vs. species vs. biosystems Animal rights (cont.) Tom Regan Animal rights Beings of moral standing should not be treated as mere means, but as an end to themselves Subjects-of-a-life Normal mammals of a year or more Carl Cohen Reciprocality of rights Consciousness Physicalism Dualism Substance dualism Property dualism Matter vs mind Chalmers Zombies The conceivability argument Consciousness (cont.) The interaction problem of dualism Ockham’s razor Idealism The easy problems vs. the hard problem of consciousness Nagel – what is it like to be a bat Qualia Objective scientific knowledge vs. subjective experience Free Will Free will Determinism Fate Determinism by God vs. determinism by physical laws Incompatiblism Libertarianism Hard determinism Compatibilism The garden of forking paths Indeterminism Agent causation Deliberation Moral responsibility The Meaning of Life Subjective vs. objective theories Eudomonia (the good life) – Aristotle Positive psychology The meaning of life is the search for the meaning of life Otherworldly religion Utilitarianism Environmentalism Family Human progress The present moment Zen Nihilism Existentialism Time Travel Presentism Eternalism Time travel to the future vs. time travel to the past Grandfather paradox Butterfly effect Causal loops Coherent time travel Novato self-consistency principle Time travel and free will Travel through parallel universes Constant creation of new alternative universes