SEARCHES FOR TRANSIENT AND OSCILLATING EXOTIC SPINDEPENDENT INTERACTIONS Derek F. Jackson Kimball Collaborators (Experiment) Dmitry Budker Szymek Pustelny Alex Sushkov Wojtek Gawlik Micah Ledbetter …and many students! Collaborators (Theory and Analysis) Maxim Pospelov Surjeet Rajendran Peter Graham Chris Pankow Josh Smith Outline Brief review of “traditional” searches for new spin-dependent interactions; A new search for transient spin-dependent interactions of astrophysical origin: GNOME: the Global Network of Optical Magnetometers to search for Exotic physics; A new search for oscillating spin-dependent interactions (and the QCD axion): CASPEr: the Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment. Why study fundamental physics? Max Zolotorev Physicists are 3% of rat. Exotic spin-dependent interactions New scalar/pseudoscalar bosons (axion) and vector/axial-vector bosons generate new forces: J. E. Moody and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 30, 130 (1984); B. A. Dobrescu and I. Mocioiu, J. High Energy Phys. 11, 5 (2006). New scalar/pseudoscalar bosons (axion) and vector/axial-vector bosons generate new forces: J. E. Moody and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 30, 130 (1984); B. A. Dobrescu and I. Mocioiu, J. High Energy Phys. 11, 5 (2006). Spin-dependent interactions Exotic spin-dependent interactions exert torques on atomic constituents (electrons and nuclei), leading to spin precession. Long-range monopole-dipole (spin-gravity?) interaction Hamiltonian in Earth’s field: Shift of Zeeman sublevels Spin precession g S 0 E M = -1 M=0 M=1 Dual-isotope Rb comagnetometer W W Wg WL85 87Rb 85Rb Wg WL87 Dual-isotope Rb comagnetometer Form ratio of difference/sum of precession frequencies: Dual-isotope Rb comagnetometer Form ratio of difference/sum of precession frequencies: = 0 if there is no spin-gravity interaction, 0 if there is a spin-gravity interaction. Preliminary data: time domain Preliminary data: frequency domain Lorentzian function: Progress report published in: Annalen der Physik 525(7), 514-528 (2013). 10 Proton constraints -26 p s Coupling strength (|g g |/c) 10 -28 10 -30 10 -32 10 -34 10 -36 laboratory limits Youdin et al. (1996) Raffelt (2012) Projected constraints from our experiment 10 -38 10 -2 10 0 10 2 10 4 10 6 10 8 Length scale (m) D. F. Jackson Kimball, arXiv:1407.2671 (2015). astrophysical limits 10 10 10 12 Short-range dipole-dipole interactions Short-range dipole-dipole interactions M. P. Ledbetter et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 040402 (2013). Short-range dipole-dipole interactions S. Kotler et al., arXiv:1501.07891 (2015). Short-range dipole-dipole interactions S. Kotler et al., arXiv:1501.07891 (2015). Transient spin-dependent effects Global Network of Optical Magnetometers to search for Exotic Physics (GNOME) GNOME Transient event at a single sensor could not be distinguished from noise. However, a global array of sensors could confidently detect transient events! M. Pospelov, S. Pustelny, M. P. Ledbetter, D. F. Jackson Kimball, W. Gawlik, and D. Budker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 021803 (2013). Pseudoscalar domain walls Shortly after the Big Bang, regions of space with different energy-degenerate pseudoscalar vacua form, separated by domain walls. Depending on properties could contribute to dark matter or dark energy. At the domain walls: sharp gradient gives atomic spins a “kick” that could be detected. Pseudoscalar domain walls Characteristic wall thickness: Characteristic mass/area: Cosmologically plausible wall separation: Hamiltonian for spin interaction with domain wall: Pseudoscalar domain walls Energy density: Proof of principle experiment published in: Annalen der Physik 525(8-9), 659-670 (2013). GNOME: proof of principle Correlated data from existing shielded magnetometers were acquired at 2 sites. GNOME prototype detector Rb-K-He-3 SERF comagnetometer sensor (similar to that designed by Romalis, Kornack, and collaborators at Princeton). M. Smiciklas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 171604 (2011). GNOME prototype detector M. Smiciklas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 171604 (2011). Projected sensitivity: GNOME: other search possibilities? • Correlated noise (spacetime foam)? • Burst of anomalous field from cataclysmic astrophysical event (torsion gravity wave)? • Lorentz violation coupled to gravity? • Cosmic strings? • Other (crazy) ideas? Oscillating spin-dependent effects Oscillating axion field as dark matter P. W. Graham and S. Rajendran, Phys. Rev. D 88, 1035023 (2013). Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr) Cosmic Axion Spin Pr ecession Exper iment D. Budker et al., Phys. Rev. X 4, 021030 (2014). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) NMR resonant spin flip when Larmor frequency Oscillating axion field Axion affects physics of nucleus, NMR is sensitive probe. Oscillating nuclear EDM, couples to electric field and acts as “pseudo magnetic field.” Oscillating axion field Axion affects physics of nucleus, NMR is sensitive probe. Gradient of axion field couples to nuclei acts as “pseudo magnetic field.” Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Axion affects physics of nucleus, NMR is sensitive probe. SQUID pickup loop axion “wind” or Larmor frequency = axion mass ➔ resonant enhancement CASPEr Wind CASPEr Wind CASPEr Electric 1st generation: Use a ferroelectric such as PbTiO3 and thermal polarization at high field. Scan magnetic field and search for axion NMR resonance. 2nd generation: Use hyperpolarized, larger volume sample (new species?). Extend spin coherence time to take advantage of full axion coherence time. Physicists are 3% of rat. Traditional laboratory searches for exotic spindependent interactions have made significant progress. New laboratory searches for transient and oscillating spin-dependent effects of astrophysical origin (dark matter, dark energy, ???) offer exciting possibilities to discover exotic physics! Conclusions Thank you!