COURSE: TITLE: SEMESTER: CLASSROOM: WEBSITE: BUS 478 D600 E200 (Tue.) Strategy Spring 2016 (1161) WMC 3220 http://www.sfu.ca/ ~sheppard/478index.html Pre-requisites: Bus 207, 312, 343, 360, and either Bus 374 or 381, and 90 credit hours. Objectives 1. Develop a capacity to think strategically about a firm, its business position, how it can gain a competitive advantage. 2. Conduct strategic analyses for a variety of industries, organizations and situations so as to develop a strong grasp of the competitive challenges of a global environment. 3. Become acquainted with the managerial tasks associated with strategy formulation, and the actions managers can take to promote competent implementation. 4. Integrate knowledge from other courses to see how parts of the business puzzle fit together and why different parts of a firm need to be managed in harmony. Required Textbook Hitt, Ireland & Hoskisson, Strategic Management, Competiveness & Globalization, Concepts 11th ed. Cengage. ISBN: 9781285425184 Grades Individual written case analysis . . . . . . . Midterm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Individual contribution to group . . . . . . . Group written case Synopsis . . . . . . . . . Group written case analysis . . . . . . . . . . Group presentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revised: January 11, 2016 28% 28% 12% 5% 5% 10% 12% INSTRUCTOR: Jerry Sheppard Office: WMC 4387 Hours: Tue. 2:40-4:10 & by Appointment Phone: 778-782-4918 E-mail: sheppard@sfu.ca Class participation Positive contribution to class discussion is an integral part of the course; coming to class is not enough! Attendance accounts for some of this and contribution to discussion accounts for a major part. The best way to contribute is to be prepared by reading the material in advance and saying something in class. Keep in mind that your contribution will be evaluated for quality. Individual Analysis The Individual analysis is on a Hopworks Urban Brewery (optionally you can analyze a company called HYDS). Introductions to the companies are available on the Bus. 478 Web page. You will need to update the information on the firm you select and its industry as best you can. Your analysis should use the doc. file linked to “Blank Analysis Template” available on the Bus. 478 Web page. Group project and presentation You will form into groups of five by the 3rd class. Groups should have folks who have a range of skills, and can work well together. You will be evaluating others in the group. The average grade for the group is to be 3.1. If you choose not to fill out a grade form, all group members will receive a 3.15. Your group will write a 5-8 page synopsis of a company of your choice. It will cover the firm’s history, environment, current state and main strategic challenges. At the end of the term your group will present a 35-minute analysis of this firm. The group will then have two days to complete a written analysis of the firm. Session breakdown Most sessions will include a short lecture on critical chapter points, some strategy based exercise and a case (a 20%, 40% 40% split, respectively). Lecture material, taken from the concepts chapters, is available online in Power Point (an ‘Essentials’ version that I go through in class, and a full version, with audio) at my convenient website: http://www.sfu.ca/~sheppard/478index.html Date Ethical Considerations You are expected to do your own work on the individual assignments. Failure to do so, or plagiarism, or insufficient citation could result in a zero for the assignment. Course Coverage Responsibility for discussion of case analyses and exercises is the students; the instructor’s role is to facilitate. This is where the majority of the class participation mark is derived. . Topic Detail and Cases Jan. 05 Strategic Management, Performance & Cases Jan. 12 External & Internal Environment, Insourcing, IMI Case, & Double-In-Class Practice, Part 1 Basics Bus. & Corp Level Strategy Jan. 19 In-Class Exercise # 1, Part 2 & Toms Jan. 26 International / Cooperative Strategy, Double-In-Class Practice, Part 2 Dynamics, Restructuring, Kaskazi 1, Kaskazi 2, Feb. 02 In-Class Exercise #2 & Chapter Review Read Due Ch. 1, Case Ppt. Performance Ppt. Ch. 2 & 3, IMI Case, Insourcing, Double-Practice 1 Ch. 4 & 6, In-Class Exercise 1, Toms Case Group List Ch. 8 & 9 In-Class Exercise 1 Double-Practice 2 Ch. 5 & 7, In-Class Exercise 2, Kaskazi 1 & 2 Case Synopsis Feb. 05 Revised Due Date for the Company Synopsis Feb. 09 Reading Break Applications Feb. 16 Midterm Feb. 23 Renewal Innovation & Corp. Governance, Juwi Mar. 1 Control & Rewards, Van Halen & Corning Case Mar. 8 Individual: Preferred: Hopworks Urban Brewery analysis Optional: HYDS Ends Mar. 15 Leadership & the BP Deepwater Horizon Case Ch. 10 & 13, Juwi Ch. 11, Corning, Van Halen H. U. B. HYDS Individual Analysis Ch. 12, BP Deepwater Mar. 22 Case Presentations (Written analysis due Mar. 24) Mar. 29 Case Presentations (Written analysis due Mar. 31) Apr. 05 Case Presentations (Written analysis due Apr. 07) Revised: January 11, 2016 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bus 478 Group Selection COURSE: BUS 478-3 TITLE: Strategy NOTES: http://www.sfu.ca/~sheppard/index.html INSTRUCTOR: Dr. J. Sheppard Office: WMX 4387 Phone: 778-782-4918 E-mail: sheppard@sfu.ca GROUP MEMBERS: Name Student ID # Title Concentration CEO COO CMO CFO CHR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bus 478 Group Evaluation Group _________________________ Grades range Fill in only the column that from 0.0 - 4.4. applies to your group Title 4 Person 5 Person 6 Person Group Group Group CEO: COO: CMO: CFO: CHR: CIO: Total: Revised: January 11, 2016 12.4 15.5 18.6 Comments Analysis Outline Section of report Grade range is 0.0 – 4.4 Mission, Objectives, Goals, stakeholders Form Updated Information Current Mission Goals & Objectives Stakeholders Macro Environment General and Industry Environment Resources and Capabilities / Core Competencies Business, Corp. and International Strategies Synthesis (Demographics, Economy, etc.) Industry Environment (Porter’s 5) Competitors (top 3 or so) What are the industry dynamics Average Revised: January 11, 2016 Clearly outline these elements. Industry dynamics include the likelihood of competitor attach and response and the form these attacks and responses are likely to take given conditions in the environment Resources (Tangible / Intangible) Capabilities (by Functional Area) Core Competencies (VIRO) Performance Details will be needed (e.g. you should say “Their physical plant is the most modern and efficient in the industry and it allows them to….” rather than simply listing “physical Plant” under a list of tangible resources). Business Level Strategy Corporate Level Strategy International Strategy Cooperative Strategy Tell me what is their: ־Generic Bus. level strategy is (Cost Leadership, Diff, Focus, etc.) ־Corp. level strategy (Conglomerate, Vert. Integration Single bus., etc.) ־International Strategy (Global, Transnational, Multidomestic). ־Any Joint Ventures, etc. Firm Strengths & Weaknesses Enviro. Opportunities & Threats SWOT Matrix Does the strategy fit the SWOT Summarize not only the strengths & weaknesses / opportunities & threats but relate them to each other – how does all that you’ve said so far fit together. evaluate Alternatives Evaluation of Alternatives Recommendation Describe Action Plan for Implementation If case info. needs updating, update it and bring the audience/reader up to speed. Provide the firm’s current Mission & Goals. Who’re the stakeholders & what do they want? Possible Alternatives Criteria by which you will Selecting a Course of Action Content implementation Discuss the logic of Action Plan Are any new organizational structure or controls needed Criteria to evaluate change success. Generate possible alternatives. Evaluate possible courses of action given mission, SWOT and strategy. Evaluation (Apply the criteria) Recommend (This is a must) Logical & appropriate Action Plan for implementing your recommendations (1st this, then) Review any new organizational structure or controls needed Criteria by which you will evaluate whether the change was successful. Analysis Outline The written version should be no more than 20 page, including cover and citations, no table of contents or exec summary needed, no less than 11 pt, double space, and no less than 1-inch margins. Mix the tables and figures into the text as they are mentioned in the paper. INTRODUCTION Background in Brief The Organization Today MISSION, GOALS & STAKEHOLDERS Mission Goals and Objectives 1. … 2. … Stakeholders 1. … 2. … EXTERNAL ANALYSIS General Environment 1. … 2. … Industry Environment 1. … 2. … Competitor Analysis 1. … 2. … Analysis of Dynamics of External Forces 1. … 2. … INTERNAL ANALYSIS Resources Tangible 1. … 2. … Intangible 1. … 2. … Capabilities 1. … 2. … Core Competencies 1. … 2. … 3. Three is plenty Performance 1. … 2. … STRATEGY Revised: January 11, 2016 Business Level Strategy Corporate Level Strategy International Strategy Cooperative Strategies SYNTHESIS Strengths 1. … 2. … Weaknesses 1. … 2. … Opportunities 1. … 2. … Threats 1. … 2. … SWOT Matrix! SWOT fit with strate gy SELECTING A COURSE OF ACTION Alternatives 1. … 2. … 3. … Criteria for Evaluation 1. … 2. … 3. … Evaluation Matrix of Criteria to Alternatives Recommendation Short term Long Term IMPLEMENTATION Action Plan Described 1. … 2. … Rationale for Action Plan New Structure & Control Systems needed Criteria to Evaluate Implementation Success STUDENT INPUT FOR CLASS PARTICIPATION GRADE (Due last Class) A- B+ B B- C+ C Name ________________________ Student # ________________________ General attendance A+ A C- D F (Missed Classes) Comments: ___________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ On-time attendance A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F (Late Classes) Comments: ___________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Minutes of Sleep or A+ A Newspaper Reading in Class __________________________________________________________________ Contribution Quantity A- B+ B A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C B- C+ C C- D F C- D Comments: __________________ F Comments: ___________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Contribution Quality A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F Comments: ___________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Other (Specify) A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F Comments: __________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Other (Specify) A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D F Comments: __________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016 Revised: January 11, 2016