Grinnell High School Student
Achievement Data
2011-2012
Definition of terms
 AIG: Annual Improvement Goals (Set by the district, must
be measurable, approved by the School Improvement
Advisory Committee and then by the board)
 SIAC: School Improvement Advisory Committee (District
Employees, Community Members who look at student
achievement data and make a recommendation to the board
for student achievement goals).
 AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress (NCLB stair-step model of
proficiency) which is reported to the state. Schools must
meet AYP or go on a watch list, then become a SINA school
District Annual Improvement Goals
•
All FAY students in grades 4, 8, and 11 will meet or exceed
typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in math and reading.
•
All FAY students in grades 8 and 11 will meet or exceed
typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in science.
•
The district will develop a common language and process
to assist students in goal setting to promote individual
growth K-12.
GHS Reading Data (AIG)
 In 2010-11, 39 students had a National Standard Score that
was considered less than typical in Reading Comprehension
at the 10th Grade level.
 29 of those students improved their NSS Reading Score by at
least 7 NSS points as 11th Graders (74.4%)
 101 out of 136 students made typical growth from 10th – 11th
grade (73.9%) .
 RESULT: Goal that all students meet or exceed typical NS
growth was not met by 35 students in Reading
Comprehension.
Reading Proficiency: Class of 2012
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2012: Reading Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
08-09 (9th)
69.5%
66.7%
72.6%
13.0%
81.9%
41.2%
79.8%
09-10 (10th)
79.1%
78.3%
80.0%
25.0%
88.6%
65.8%
84.4%
10-11 (11th)
83.5%
80.3%
86.9%
22.2%
93.6%
76.7%
85.6%
SUBGROUP
08-09 (9th)
09-10 (10th)
10-11 (11th)
Reading Proficiency: Class of 2013
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2013: Reading Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
09-10 (9th)
75.2%
66.7%
83.3%
15.4%
81.3%
71.4%
76.8%
10-11 (10th)
78.3%
72.5%
84.1%
14.3%
85.5%
69.6%
82.6%
11-12 (11th)
85.0%
79.1%
90.9%
30.8%
90.8%
79.0%
88.0%
SUBGROUP
09-10 (9th)
10-11 (10th)
11-12 (11th)
Reading Proficiency: Class of 2014
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2014: Reading Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
10-11 (9th)
82.3%
94.9%
68.1%
53.3%
85.6%
68.3%
87.7%
11-12 (10th)
85.6%
87.5%
83.3%
50.0%
89.4%
70.0%
92.0%
12-13 (11th)
SUBGROUP
10-11 (9th)
11-12 (10th)
12-13 (11th)
Reading Proficiency: Class of 2015
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2015: Reading Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
11-12 (9th)
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
84.2%
82.1%
86.4%
57.1%
87.4%
75.0%
91.0%
12-13 (10th)
13-14 (11th)
SUBGROUP
11-12 (9th)
12-13 (10th)
13-14 (11th)
9th Reading Comp. Biennium
9th Grade Reading Comprehension: TOTAL (NPR)
100%
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
90%
16.2%
20.5%
19.8%
18.2%
54.4%
54.3%
20.1%
21.1%
80%
70%
60%
50%
64.2%
61.2%
Advanced
58.7%
62.1%
40%
Low
30%
20%
10%
Proficient
19.6%
18.3%
05-07
06-08
25.9%
27.5%
07-09
08-10
21.1%
16.8%
09-11
10-12
0%
BIENNIUM
10th Reading Comp. Biennium
10th Grade Reading Comprension: TOTAL (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
20.4%
20.4%
21.7%
20.1%
17.6%
58.4%
61.0%
21.5%
80%
60%
Advanced
60.6%
59.6%
58.8%
60.6%
Proficient
Low
40%
20%
19.0%
20.0%
19.5%
21.6%
21.3%
17.9%
05-07
06-08
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
0%
BIENNIUM
11th Reading Comp. Biennium
11th Grade Reading Comprehension: TOTAL (NPR)
100%
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
90%
80%
30.6%
25.8%
24.0%
28.1%
25.0%
22.3%
70%
60%
Advanced
50%
40%
58.8%
61.9%
62.3%
64.4%
58.2%
10.4%
11.9%
11.6%
13.7%
16.2%
15.8%
05-07
06-08
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
59.0%
Low
30%
20%
10%
0%
BIENNIUM
Proficient
11th Reading Comp. Biennium (F/R)
11th Grade Reading: F/R (NPR)
100%
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
90%
17.0%
10.6%
8.5%
55.3%
59.6%
5.1%
1.6%
61.0%
65.1%
5.1%
80%
70%
60%
50%
73.1%
57.4%
Proficient
40%
Low
30%
20%
10%
Advanced
25.5%
34.0%
31.9%
33.9%
07-09
08-10
33.3%
21.8%
0%
05-07
06-08
BIENNIUM
09-11
10-12
11th Reading Comp. Biennium
(Non F/R)
11th Grade Reading: NON-F/R (NPR)
100%
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
90%
80%
32.8%
29.3%
27.6%
34.8%
32.5%
29.7%
70%
60%
Advanced
50%
40%
Proficient
57.1%
60.0%
63.9%
65.5%
7.2%
6.8%
6.9%
7.8%
10.7%
13.2%
05-07
06-08
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
57.4%
56.9%
30%
20%
10%
0%
BIENNIUM
Low
11th Reading Comp. Biennium (IEP)
11th Grade Reading: IEP (NPR)
100%
0.0%
4.8%
6.7%
6.9%
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
90%
80%
44.4%
70%
42.9%
3.3%
0.0%
23.3%
25.8%
34.5%
46.7%
60%
Advanced
50%
Proficient
40%
30%
55.6%
52.4%
05-07
06-08
20%
73.3%
74.2%
09-11
10-12
58.6%
46.7%
10%
0%
07-09
08-10
BIENNIUM
Low
11th Reading Comp. Biennium
(Non-IEP)
11th Grade Reading: NON-IEP (NPR)
100%
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
90%
80%
33.5%
27.7%
26.4%
30.8%
27.8%
25.3%
70%
60%
Advanced
50%
40%
Proficient
64.1%
66.8%
61.1%
63.5%
66.8%
7.2%
8.2%
6.8%
8.1%
8.7%
7.9%
05-07
06-08
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
59.3%
30%
20%
10%
0%
BIENNIUM
Low
AYP (NCLB) Trajectory
% of Students Proficient
NCLB % Proficient: Reading Comprehension (11th
GRADE)
100.0%
95.0%
90.0%
85.0%
80.0%
75.0%
70.0%
65.0%
60.0%
55.0%
50.0%
GHS
IOWA
NCLB Trajectory
0405
0506
0607
0708
0809
0910
1011
1112
1213
GHS
85.6% 93.1% 88.7% 91.1% 92.0% 89.1% 83.2% 87.5%
IOWA
76.8% 76.8% 76.9% 75.6% 76.5% 75.8% 76.7%
NCLB Trajectory 74.2% 74.2% 74.2% 79.3% 79.3% 79.3% 84.5% 89.7% 94.8%
School Year
Reading: Less Than Typical NSS
READING: Less Than Typical NSS %
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
9th
20.0%
10th
15.0%
11th
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
9th
10th
11th
06-07
27.5%
35.3%
22.7%
07-08
34.8%
33.8%
20.0%
08-09
36.7%
36.3%
23.1%
09-10
36.2%
38.8%
28.6%
10-11
29.3%
31.9%
32.3%
11-12
26.3%
23.9%
24.1%
Reading: Exceeding NSS Growth
Reading: % of Students Exceedig Typical NSS Growth (as FAY Juniors)
80.0%
74.4%
70.9%
69.9%
70.0%
66.7%
66.7%
62.3%
60.0%
57.3%
52.1%
50.4%
50.0%
9th-10th
40.0%
10th-11th
9th-11th
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Class of 11
Class of 12
Class of 13
Reading: NSS Average Growth
Reading: Average NSS Growth (as FAY Juniors)
35.0
29.2
30.0
27.4
25.0
23.3
20.5
20.0
9th-10th
16.9
15.7
10th-11th
15.0
9th-11th
11.7
10.0
8.7
6.3
5.0
0.0
Class of 11
Class of 12
Class of 13
District Annual Improvement Goals
•
All FAY students in grades 4, 8, and 11 will meet or exceed
typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in math and reading.
•
All FAY students in grades 8 and 11 will meet or exceed
typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in science.
•
The district will develop a common language and process
to assist students in goal setting to promote individual
growth K-12.
GHS Math Data (AIG)
 In 2010-11, 29 students had a National Standard Score that
was considered less than typical in Math at the 10th Grade
level.
 24 of those students improved their NSS Math Score by at
least 7 NSS points as 11th Graders (82.8%)
 96 out of 136 students made typical growth from 10th – 11th
grade (70.7%) .
 RESULT: Goal that all students meet or exceed typical NS
growth was not met by 40 students in Math.
Math Proficiency: Class of 2012
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2012: Math Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
08-09 (9th)
74.8%
75.4%
74.2%
21.7%
86.5%
45.5%
85.1%
09-10 (10th)
82.1%
82.6%
81.5%
30.0%
91.2%
63.2%
89.6%
10-11 (11th)
80.3%
83.4%
77.1%
33.4%
88.1%
53.3%
88.7%
SUBGROUP
08-09 (9th)
09-10 (10th)
10-11 (11th)
Math Proficiency: Class of 2013
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2013: Math Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
09-10 (9th)
86.5%
84.1%
88.9%
38.5%
91.4%
83.3%
87.9%
10-11 (10th)
84.1%
81.2%
87.0%
28.6%
90.3%
71.7%
90.2%
11-12 (11th)
87.2%
86.6%
87.9%
38.5%
92.5%
83.0%
89.0%
SUBGROUP
09-10 (9th)
10-11 (10th)
11-12 (11th)
Math Proficiency: Class of 2014
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2014: Math Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
10-11 (9th)
83.7%
89.7%
76.8%
53.3%
87.1%
70.7%
88.7%
11-12 (10th)
83.6%
87.5%
78.8%
14.3%
90.9%
67.0%
90.0%
12-13 (11th)
SUBGROUP
10-11 (9th)
11-12 (10th)
12-13 (11th)
Math Proficiency: Class of 2015
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2015: Math Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
11-12 (9th)
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
80.1%
80.6%
80.3%
28.6%
86.6%
67.0%
91.0%
12-13 (10th)
13-14 (11th)
SUBGROUP
11-12 (9th)
12-13 (10th)
13-14 (11th)
9th Math Biennium
9th Grade Math: TOTAL (NPR)
100%
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
90%
24.8%
80%
30.1%
28.2%
27.6%
33.0%
27.8%
70%
60%
Advanced
50%
40%
61.5%
58.8%
53.8%
53.4%
17.9%
19.0%
14.9%
17.9%
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
52.1%
54.3%
30%
20%
10%
13.7%
11.0%
05-07
06-08
0%
BIENNIUM
Proficient
Low
10th Math Biennium
10th Grade Math: TOTAL (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
24.4%
21.6%
23.8%
21.6%
25.4%
25.0%
80%
60%
Advanced
58.1%
59.0%
54.2%
56.1%
40%
57.7%
58.8%
16.9%
16.2%
09-11
10-12
20%
17.4%
19.4%
22.0%
22.3%
05-07
06-08
07-09
08-10
0%
BIENNIUM
Proficient
Low
11th Math Biennium
11th Grade Math: TOTAL (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
90%
80%
35.7%
34.0%
32.0%
34.1%
32.6%
29.2%
70%
60%
Advanced
50%
Proficient
40%
50.6%
50.6%
53.2%
52.9%
51.9%
54.6%
13.8%
15.4%
14.8%
13.0%
15.5%
16.2%
05-07
06-08
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
30%
20%
10%
0%
BIENNIUM
Low
11th Math Biennium (F/R)
11th Grade Math: F/R (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
90%
21.3%
14.9%
12.8%
12.3%
51.1%
52.6%
9.8%
8.9%
80%
70%
60%
50%
53.2%
49.2%
62.8%
53.2%
Proficient
Low
40%
30%
20%
10%
Advanced
25.5%
31.9%
36.2%
35.1%
06-08
07-09
08-10
41.0%
28.2%
0%
05-07
BIENNIUM
09-11
10-12
11th Math Biennium (Non F/R)
11th Grade Math: NON-F/R (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
90%
80%
38.7%
38.3%
36.5%
40.2%
39.6%
37.9%
70%
60%
Advanced
50%
Proficient
40%
50.0%
50.0%
53.7%
11.3%
11.7%
05-07
06-08
51.1%
52.9%
52.8%
9.9%
6.9%
7.6%
10.9%
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
30%
20%
10%
0%
BIENNIUM
Low
11th Math Biennium (IEP)
11th Grade Math: IEP (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
90%
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
6.7%
10.3%
23.8%
80%
33.3%
70%
3.3%
0.0%
26.7%
35.5%
27.6%
60%
Advanced
50%
Proficient
40%
83.3%
Low
76.2%
30%
60.0%
62.1%
07-09
08-10
70.0%
64.5%
20%
10%
0%
05-07
06-08
BIENNIUM
09-11
10-12
11th Math Biennium (Non-IEP)
11th Grade Math: NON-IEP (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
90%
80%
38.2%
37.1%
35.5%
40.2%
36.4%
33.2%
70%
60%
Advanced
50%
Proficient
40%
30%
53.0%
53.0%
55.9%
8.8%
9.9%
8.6%
05-07
06-08
07-09
55.3%
57.2%
6.9%
8.3%
9.6%
08-10
09-11
10-12
52.9%
20%
10%
0%
BIENNIUM
Low
AYP (NCLB) Trajectory
% of Students Proficient
NCLB % Proficient: Math (11th GRADE)
100.0%
95.0%
90.0%
85.0%
80.0%
75.0%
70.0%
65.0%
60.0%
55.0%
50.0%
GHS
IOWA
NCLB Trajectory
04050607080910111205
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
GHS
83.5% 90.1% 84.8% 85.7% 89.3% 91.4% 80.7% 88.0%
IOWA
78.0% 77.6% 77.8% 76.8% 76.6% 76.8% 76.4%
NCLB Trajectory 74.2% 74.2% 74.2% 79.3% 79.3% 79.3% 84.5% 89.7% 94.8%
School Year
Math: Less Than Typical NSS
MATH: Less Than Typical NSS %
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
9th
15.0%
10th
11th
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
9th
10th
11th
06-07
24.1%
33.6%
23.3%
07-08
17.8%
30.5%
20.8%
08-09
35.0%
30.4%
23.9%
09-10
22.9%
29.1%
22.1%
10-11
23.1%
27.5%
25.9%
11-12
28.6%
21.2%
29.3%
Math: Exceeding NSS Growth
Math: % of Students Exceeding Typical NSS Growth (as FAY Juniors)
100.0%
90.0%
86.7%
80.0%
71.8%
70.0%
65.6%
60.7%
60.2%
60.0%
59.7%
55.0%
54.0%
56.0%
9th-10th
50.0%
10th-11th
9th-11th
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Class of 11
Class of 12
Class of 13
Math: Average NSS Growth
Math: Average NSS Growth (as FAY Juniors)
35.0
30.0
28.5
25.0
22.2
20.0
16.3
15.0
16.0
15.6
9th-10th
12.9
11.7
9th-11th
10.0
4.3
5.0
0.0
Class of 11
-5.0
-6.5
-10.0
10th-11th
Class of 12
Class of 13
District Annual Improvement Goals
•
All FAY students in grades 4, 8, and 11 will meet or exceed
typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in math and reading.
•
All FAY students in grades 8 and 11 will meet or exceed
typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in science.
•
The district will develop a common language and process
to assist students in goal setting to promote individual
growth K-12.
GHS Science Data (AIG)
 In 2010-11, 32 students had a National Standard Score that
was considered less than typical in Science at the 10th Grade
level.
 23 of those students improved their NSS Science Score by at
least 7 NSS points as 11th Graders (71.9%)
 101 out of 136 students made typical growth from 10th – 11th
grade (74.4%) .
 RESULT: Goal that all students meet or exceed typical NS
growth was not met by 35 students in Math.
Science Proficiency: Class of 2012
Class of 2012: Science Proficiency
% PROFICIENT
120.0%
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
08-09 (9th)
78.1%
78.8%
77.4%
43.5%
85.7%
52.9%
87.2%
09-10 (10th)
79.1%
79.7%
78.5%
35.0%
86.8%
60.5%
86.5%
10-11 (11th)
90.5%
90.8%
90.2%
58.8%
95.4%
79.3%
93.8%
SUBGROUP
08-09 (9th)
09-10 (10th)
10-11 (11th)
Science Proficiency: Class of 2013
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2013: Science Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
09-10 (9th)
87.9%
85.3%
90.3%
61.5%
90.6%
82.9%
89.9%
10-11 (10th)
82.6%
76.8%
88.4%
21.4%
89.5%
67.4%
90.2%
11-12 (11th)
87.2%
85.1%
89.4%
46.2%
91.7%
83.0%
89.0%
SUBGROUP
09-10 (9th)
10-11 (10th)
11-12 (11th)
Science Proficiency: Class of 2014
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2014: Science Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
10-11 (9th)
87.7%
93.6%
80.9%
80.0%
88.5%
80.0%
90.6%
11-12 (10th)
89.7%
93.8%
84.9%
42.9%
94.7%
77.0%
95.0%
12-13 (11th)
SUBGROUP
10-11 (9th)
11-12 (10th)
12-13 (11th)
Science Proficiency: Class of 2015
% PROFICIENT
Class of 2015: Science Proficiency
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
11-12 (9th)
TOTAL
Male
Female
IEP
Non-IEP
F/R
Non-F/R
85.7%
82.1%
89.4%
42.9%
90.8%
79.0%
91.0%
12-13 (10th)
13-14 (11th)
SUBGROUP
11-12 (9th)
12-13 (10th)
13-14 (11th)
9th Science Biennium
9th Grade Science: TOTAL (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
90%
20.0%
24.3%
23.2%
24.3%
24.8%
23.3%
80%
70%
60%
50%
Advanced
66.7%
40%
63.2%
59.7%
59.0%
62.9%
63.4%
30%
20%
10%
13.3%
12.5%
17.1%
16.8%
12.2%
13.3%
05-07
06-08
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
0%
BIENNIUM
Proficient
Low
10th Science Biennium
10th Grade Science: TOTAL (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
20.3%
20.8%
24.6%
22.8%
25.4%
80%
29.3%
60%
Advanced
63.5%
63.1%
57.6%
57.8%
55.5%
40%
Proficient
57.0%
20%
16.2%
16.1%
17.8%
19.4%
19.1%
05-07
06-08
07-09
08-10
09-11
13.7%
0%
BIENNIUM
10-12
Low
11th Science Biennium
11th Grade Science: TOTAL (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
90%
80%
36.6%
33.7%
34.8%
37.2%
32.7%
29.3%
70%
60%
Advanced
50%
Proficient
40%
30%
56.3%
54.4%
49.4%
54.5%
59.5%
7.1%
9.9%
10.8%
13.4%
12.8%
11.2%
05-07
06-08
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
56.3%
20%
10%
0%
BIENNIUM
Low
11th Science Biennium (F/R)
11th Grade Science: F/R (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
90%
19.1%
10.6%
12.8%
70.2%
61.7%
14.0%
8.3%
10.4%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
54.4%
61.7%
71.4%
70.2%
20%
0%
10.6%
05-07
Proficient
Low
30%
10%
Advanced
19.1%
06-08
25.5%
07-09
31.6%
30.0%
18.2%
08-10
BIENNIUM
09-11
10-12
11th Science Biennium (Non F/R)
11th Grade Science: NON-F/R (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
90%
80%
40.3%
39.0%
39.9%
43.6%
40.1%
37.4%
70%
60%
Advanced
50%
Proficient
Low
40%
30%
53.4%
53.2%
52.7%
48.0%
52.3%
54.4%
6.3%
7.8%
7.4%
8.3%
7.6%
8.2%
05-07
06-08
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
20%
10%
0%
BIENNIUM
11th Science Biennium (IEP)
11th Grade Science: IEP (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
0.0%
4.8%
90%
10.0%
10.7%
80%
70%
32.1%
66.7%
60%
61.9%
3.6%
0.0%
42.9%
53.3%
46.7%
Advanced
50%
Proficient
40%
Low
30%
20%
33.3%
33.3%
05-07
06-08
57.1%
53.6%
08-10
09-11
43.3%
46.7%
10%
0%
07-09
BIENNIUM
10-12
11th Science Biennium (Non-IEP)
11th Grade Science: NON-IEP (NPR)
LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
100%
90%
80%
39.2%
36.4%
38.2%
40.3%
36.2%
33.2%
70%
60%
Advanced
50%
Proficient
40%
30%
51.5%
55.9%
60.3%
6.4%
8.2%
7.9%
6.6%
07-09
08-10
09-11
10-12
55.8%
55.5%
5.2%
7.8%
05-07
06-08
55.6%
20%
10%
0%
BIENNIUM
Low
District Annual Improvement Goals
 Increase the percentage of students whose reading
comprehension NSS are above the typical NSS increase for
grades 4, 8, and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY
NSS scores in grades 3, 7, and 10 in reading comprehension
and mathematics, and in grades 8 and 11 as compared to
their matched cohort FAY NSS scores in grades 7 and 10 in
science, as measured by the appropriate ITBS and ITED
subtests.
GHS Science Data (AIG)
 In 2009-10, 38 students had a National Standard Score “less
than typical” (268) in Science in the 10th Grade.
 35 of those students improved their NSS as 11th Graders
 However, 24 of the 33 students improved their scores to
meet the typical NSS of 275.
 RESULT: Goal to increase the percentage of students
scoring above the typical NSS in Science was met.
Science: Less Than Typical NSS
SCIENCE: Less Than Typical NSS %
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
9th
15.0%
10th
11th
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
9th
10th
11th
06-07
23.4%
21.2%
18.2%
07-08
25.2%
26.8%
19.2%
08-09
35.2%
28.4%
16.2%
09-10
25.7%
34.3%
22.9%
10-11
25.9%
27.5%
14.6%
11-12
24.1%
16.4%
25.6%
Science: Exceeding NSS Growth
Science: % of Students Exceeding Typical NSS Growth (as FAY Juniors)
90.0%
82.1%
77.1%
80.0%
70.0%
66.4%
61.7%
60.9%
57.3%
60.0%
52.1%
48.0%
47.2%
50.0%
9th-10th
10th-11th
40.0%
9th-11th
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Class of 11
Class of 12
Class of 13
Science: Average NSS Growth
Science: Average NSS Growth (as FAY Juniors)
40.0
33.8
35.0
30.0
24.8
25.0
23.1
9th-10th
20.0
16.5
16.3
15.0
9.3
10.0
8.6
7.9
5.2
5.0
0.0
Class of 11
Class of 12
Class of 13
10th-11th
9th-11th
ACT Data (Does not include 11-12)
AVERAGE ACT READING
26
AVERAGE SCORE
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
10-11
GHS
23.7
24
23.6
23.1
23.6
23.7
24.9
IOWA
22.4
22.5
22.6
22.9
22.9
22.6
22.6
NATIONAL
21.3
21.4
21.5
21.4
21.4
21.5
YEAR
GHS
IOWA
NATIONAL
ACT Data (Does not include 10-11)
% READY FOR COLLEGE READING (Line Graph Visual)
80%
% OF STUDENTS
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
YEAR
GHS
IOWA
09-10
10-11
ACT Data (Does not include 10-11)
AVERAGE ACT ENGLISH
AVERAGE SCORE
24
23.5
23
22.5
22
21.5
21
20.5
20
19.5
19
18.5
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
10-11
GHS
22.9
22.7
22.3
22.3
22.2
23.4
23.2
IOWA
21.5
21.6
21.6
21.9
21.9
21.8
21.7
NATIONAL
20.4
20.6
20.7
20.6
20.6
20.7
YEAR
GHS
IOWA
NATIONAL
ACT Data (Does not include 10-11)
% READY FOR COLLEGE ENGLISH (Line Graph Visual)
% OF STUDENTS
90%
85%
80%
75%
70%
65%
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
YEAR
GHS
IOWA
09-10
10-11
ACT Data (Does not include 10-11)
AVERAGE ACT MATH
AVERAGE SCORE
24.5
24
23.5
23
22.5
22
21.5
21
20.5
20
19.5
19
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
10-11
GHS
22.2
22.5
22.9
22.8
22.3
23.3
23.8
IOWA
21.7
21.8
21.9
22
21.9
21.8
21.9
NATIONAL
20.7
20.8
21
21
21
21.1
YEAR
GHS
IOWA
NATIONAL
ACT Data (Does not include 10-11)
% READY FOR COLLEGE MATH (Line Graph Visual)
70%
% OF STUDENTS
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
YEAR
GHS
IOWA
09-10
10-11
ACT Data (Does not include 10-11)
AVERAGE ACT SCIENCE
25
AVERAGE SCORE
24
23
22
21
20
19
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
10-11
GHS
22.4
22.5
23.3
22.8
22.8
23.5
24.1
IOWA
22.1
22.1
22.3
22.3
22.4
22.3
22.4
NATIONAL
20.9
20.9
21
20.8
20.9
20.8
YEAR
GHS
IOWA
NATIONAL
ACT Data (Does not include 10-11)
% READY FOR COLLEGE BIOLOGY (Line Graph Visual)
% OF STUDENTS
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
YEAR
GHS
IOWA
09-10
10-11
Student Failure Data (% of Single F
Grades)
% of Students with at Least 1 Failing Mark
10-11
09-10
9.2%
9.7%
9.8%
7.6%
5.6%
5.5%
3.2%
5.3%
9th Grade
16.2%
08-09
8.6%
7.2%
10th Grade
7.8%
11th Grade
12th Grade
07-08
06-07
0.0%
5.6%
8.1%
8.5%
5.0%
11.4%
6.9%
10.0%
5.4%
15.0%
20.0%
7.5%
6.1%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
Student Failure Data (% of Multiple F
Grades)
% of Students with More Than One Failing Mark
10-11
09-10
7.8%
8.3%
11.1%
10.6%
7.6%
3.9%
13.1%
1.2%
9th Grade
08-09
11.0%
14.3%
8.6%
10th Grade
3.3%
11th Grade
12th Grade
15.4%
07-08
06-07
0.0%
11.1%
5.0%
10.1%
3.8%
10.4%
10.0%
15.0%
4.5%
12.2%
20.0%
25.0%
2.7%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
GHS Total % of Failing Grades
Total (9-12) % of Failing Grades
20.0%
9.1%
18.0%
16.0%
9.1%
8.6%
8.5%
7.5%
14.0%
12.0%
10.0%
Single F Grades
8.1%
8.0%
6.0%
Multiple F Grades
9.8%
7.0%
6.8%
6.6%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
10-11
At-Risk Information & Criteria
 At-Risk is a term defined by the Dept. of Ed.as students
“who need supports in order to ensure they make sufficient
academic progress to graduate.”
 Criteria are set locally as:
1) Chronic failure (1 core or 1+ elective courses)
2) Excessive absenteeism (below building ADA %)
3) Disciplinary Referrals (above average for building)
4) 2 years non-proficient on ITED Reading or Math
5) No extracurricular involvement in school events
* Students must meet 2 of the previous criteria
10-11 At-Risk Percentages
% of Students Meeting At-Risk Identifiers
34.9%
11th
30.2%
17.8%
11.6% 4.7% 0.8%
0
4.2%
40.8%
10th
30.9%
1
4.9% 2.8%
16.2%
2
3
4
5
2.7%
50.3%
9th
0%
10%
20%
27.5%
30%
40%
50%
60%
12.8%
70%
80%
6.0% 0.7%
90%
100%
Average Daily Attendance Trends
Average Daily Attendance: By Grade
97.0%
96.5%
96.0%
95.5%
95.0%
9th Grade
94.5%
10th Grade
94.0%
11th Grade
93.5%
12th Grade
93.0%
9th Grade
10th Grade
11th Grade
12th Grade
TOTAL
06-07
96.4%
95.5%
94.3%
96.3%
95.7%
07-08
96.0%
96.1%
95.9%
96.4%
96.1%
08-09
95.3%
94.9%
95.9%
96.8%
95.8%
09-10
95.2%
94.7%
94.8%
96.2%
95.3%
10-11
95.9%
94.4%
95.0%
95.3%
95.1%
TOTAL
% of Absences: Unexcused
% of Absences Considered Unexcused
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
9th Grade
10th Grade
5.0%
11th Grade
12th Grade
0.0%
9th Grade
10th Grade
11th Grade
12th Grade
TOTAL
06-07
5.2%
7.4%
14.2%
12.9%
10.3%
07-08
2.5%
6.9%
9.8%
17.2%
8.7%
08-09
2.3%
2.2%
4.9%
7.8%
4.0%
09-10
3.2%
6.6%
4.2%
4.4%
4.6%
10-11
3.7%
4.5%
5.4%
6.5%
5.1%
TOTAL
Tardiness & Truancy: Raw Totals
Instances of Tardiness & Truancy
1800
1600
1055
1400
740
889
1200
1000
772
691
Truancy
Tardy
800
635
600
400
376
236
200
0
508
469
0
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
10-11
% Of Students in “tardy bands”
Tardy Clusters: % of Students
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
0
30.00%
1-10
20.00%
11-20
21-30
10.00%
0.00%
0
1-10
11-20
21-30
2006-07
77.80%
20.90%
1.20%
0%
2007-08
80.80%
19.20%
0.00%
0.00%
2008-09
77.10%
20.80%
1.90%
0.20%
2009-10
76.60%
21.30%
1.60%
0.30%
2010-11
77.70%
20.10%
1.80%
0.20%
% Of Students in “truancy bands”
Truancy Clusters: % of Students
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
0
30.00%
1-10
20.00%
11-20
21-30
10.00%
0.00%
0
1-10
11-20
21-30
2006-07
72.60%
22.70%
4.20%
0.30%
2007-08
79.80%
17.80%
1.80%
0.50%
2008-09
75.60%
22.20%
1.60%
0.70%
2009-10
76.40%
21.00%
1.60%
0.90%
2010-11
73.40%
20.10%
4.20%
2.40%
Trends . . .
 What did you see that constituted a trend (movement of data
in one direction or another?)
- From our discussion Tuesday, our faculty noted that Reading Comprehension has lacked
focus over the past few years and it would behoove us to review strategies to address this
 Without gearing our whole professional development for
2011-12 toward ITED scores, what are some very simple
things we could be doing in our classes to help improve these
numbers?
- Looking at some different kinds of strategies to help students read for a purpose, be held
accountable to the reading, and simply reading more often for a variety of reasons in class
will help students get in the habit of reading more in school and to help them understand
that this will be an expectation in all of their classes.
Tentative Action Plan for GHS
 Departments will continue to look at data from ITED to
determine what skill areas can be addressed seamlessly within
existing curriculum and implement strategies to address
deficient skills
 Reading comprehension strategies will be reviewed and
accountability strategies will be introduced to increase the
amount of reading done in the content areas
 GHS faculty will continue to develop and strengthen
relationships with students through the Seminar program to
reduce the number of unexcused absences and increase
average daily attendance
2011-12 District AIG
 All FAY students in grades 4, 8, and 11 will meet or exceed
typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in math and reading.
 All FAY students in grades 8 and 11 will meet or exceed
typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in science.
 The district will develop a common language and process to
assist students in goal setting to promote individual growth
K-12.