Human Subjects Protection Committee at Cal Poly Pomona The Institutional Review Board Bruce W. Kennedy, MS RLATG CMAR Compliance Associate IRB Administrator Office of Research and Graduate Studies September 21, 2007 Basics of the IRB - Agenda Purpose of the IRB Development of Research Ethics Scope of Authority Regulations re Human Subjects Review Elements of Informed Consent Forms and Procedures Human Subjects Training and Education Wrap-up Basics of the IRB - Purpose Protect the welfare of human research subjects (or participants). Assure compliance with both federal law and ethical standards for the conduct of human subjects research. Review protocols Establish policy for the campus a medical school IRB would be different than a program of behavioral sciences Respond to non-compliance Basics of the IRB - Purpose The Cal Poly Pomona IRB The committee faculty representing various disciplines outside, unaffiliated members administrator Meets once per month generally Chair is Dr. David Adams, a professor of philosophy and ethics Basics of the IRB Respect for Persons - the IRB Principles Voluntary participation Informed consent Privacy and confidentiality Beneficence Risks must be justified by benefits to the research subject or to the community. Risks must be minimized. Data gathering must be monitored to ensure safety of subjects. Justice Subjects must be selected equitably. Avoid exploitation of vulnerable groups or populations of convenience. Those likely to benefit are not systematically excluded. Basics of the IRB - Development of Research Ethics Milestones: 1940s - Nuremberg Code 1950s-60s - Controversial studies 1964 - Declaration of Helsinki 1970s - “Common Rule” 1970s - Belmont Report 1990s - 2000s - IRBs and protections Basics of the IRB - Research Ethics Nuremberg Code … At the end of World War II, 23 Nazi doctors and scientists were put on trial for the murder of concentration camp inmates who were used as research subjects. That led to: Informed consent is essential. Risks must be justified by anticipated benefits. Research must be conducted by qualified researchers. Physical and mental suffering must be minimized. Basics of the IRB - Research Ethics Controversial studies, examples, historical perspective… Milgram study, ‘60s The purpose of this study was to determine response to authority in normal humans. The researchers told recruited volunteers that the purpose was to study learning and memory. Each subject was told to teach a "student" and to punish the students' errors by administering increasing levels of electric shocks. The "student" was a confederate of the researcher who pretended to be a poor learner and mimicked pain and even unconsciousness as the subject increased the levels of electric shock. 63% of the subjects administered lethal shocks; some even after the "student" claimed to have heart disease. Some of the subjects, after being "debriefed" from the study experienced serious emotional crises. Basics of the IRB - Research Ethics Controversial studies, examples Tuskegee syphilis study, 1932-1971 Initiated by the Public Health Service, this study was designed to document the natural history of syphilis in African-American men. Willowbrook study, 1956 In 1956, at an institution for mentally retarded children in Staten Island, New York, a study was initiated to determine the natural history of viral hepatitis and to test the effectiveness of gamma globulin as an agent for inoculating against hepatitis. Children were deliberately infected with a mild form of hepatitis. Basics of the IRB - Research Ethics Declaration of Helsinki ... The World Medical Association has developed the Declaration of Helsinki as a statement of ethical principles to provide guidance to physicians and other participants in medical research involving human subjects. Medical research involving human subjects includes research on identifiable human material or identifiable data. Medical progress is based on research which ultimately must rest in part on experimentation involving human subjects. In the field of biomedical research a fundamental distinction must be recognized between medical research in which the aim is essentially diagnostic or therapeutic for a patient, and medical research the essential object of which is purely scientific and without implying direct diagnostic or therapeutic value to the person subjected to the research. Biomedical research involving human subjects must conform to generally accepted scientific principles and should be based on adequately performed laboratory and animal experimentation and on a thorough knowledge of the scientific literature. Basics of the IRB - Research Ethics Common Rule ... The National Research Act was passed in 1974 which established: a national commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. the requirement for establishment of IRBs at institutions receiving federal monies. the various regulatory standards known collectively as the “Common Rule.” effective since 1991 adopted by 19 federal agencies based upon subpart A 45 CFR 46 this, a set of basic regulatory standards Basics of the IRB - Research Ethics Belmont Report ... published in 1979 included the Belmont Principles respect for persons beneficence and justice Basics of the IRB - Research Ethics Risks ... Evaluated according to the probability and magnitude of any harm that might occur Will the risk occur in almost all subjects or in only one of 10,000 subjects? Quantify risk according to the magnitude of harm minor itchiness could some subjects die? social, legal, economic, or psychological risks risks may apply to the individual subject or may apply to a broader segment of the society. Basics of the IRB - Scope of Authority Any research undertaken at Cal Poly Pomona, or involving Cal Poly faculty, staff, or students either as investigators or subjects. Basics of the IRB - Regulations DHHS has these components FDA NIH OHRP and the research is overseen by the IRB Code of Federal Regulations … Title 21, CFR Part 50 and CFR Part 56 Title 45, Public welfare, CFR Part 46 (45 CFR 46) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Focused on clinical, medical, therapeutic studies Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Protection of human subjects in general Miscellaneous others at the federal, state, and institutional levels Basics of the IRB - Regulations Definition of subject … A human subject is a “living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains: (a) data through intervention or interaction with the individual or (b) identifiable private information.” Vulnerable subjects prisoners, children, pregnant women, fetus, medically-afflicted, plus others Basics of the IRB - Regulations Definition of research ... Covered research is any “systematic investigation including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.” Basics of the IRB - Regulations Is it research? ... Collecting data for the purpose of publication, professional presentation at a conference or seminar, dissemination to colleagues on the Internet, or inclusion in a dissertation does count as research. For teachers, gathering data from students to: (a) improve your teaching, (b) assess your course or program, or (c) collect student input for employment actions does not constitute research. Basics of the IRB - Regulations Are you doing research? Assess your role ... Conducting “typical” research as a principal investigator, abbreviated as PI. student, graduate student, clinician, investigator Acting in the capacity of a teacher with the intention of assisting your students to learn. Acting in the capacity of a researcher with the intention of studying the process of teaching and learning. Publication of results is not a necessary condition. Basics of the IRB - Regulations What are data? Examples Privacy and de-identification Survey sheets and questionnaires, biological samples, audio and video tapes, transcripts of verbal communication, photographs, paper and electronic records, and more Existing (archived) data or samples Observation of public behavior Collection of new data though human intervention Storage and retention Protected Medical records and HIPAA Confidential vs. anonymous collection Definitions Can the collected data be traced back? Can the data identify one or more persons? Basics of the IRB - Regulations Means of protocol review ... Exempt Research using existing data or samples. Observation of public behavior. Research involving surveys or questionnaires where no personally identifying information is gathered or retained. Eligibility for exemption must be determined by the IRB, not the investigator. Expedited Poses no more than “minimal risk” to the subject, i.e., “no more than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests." Approvable by review of two members of the Board. Doesn’t necessarily mean quick or fast review. Full board Research that is neither exempt nor expeditable must receive review by the full committee. Means a convened meeting of the IRB for face-to-face discussion. Basics of the IRB - Informed consent Elements of informed consent include … Explanation of the purpose(s) of the research. Description of the procedure(s) to be followed. Summary of the data to be collected. Description of any foreseeable risks or discomforts to the subject. Description of the benefits to the subject or to others, including compensation. Explanation of how the investigator (PI) will maintain confidentiality of records. Contact information of all PIs. A statement that participation is voluntary, that refusal to participate involves no penalty or loss of benefits, and that the subject may discontinue at any time. Anything else that will help the subject to understand. Basics of the IRB - Forms and Procedures Protocol Informed consent form purpose, methodology, recruitment and description of subjects, risk evaluation, anonymity and confidentiality, benefits, compensation, etc. consent for adults assent for minors Surveys and questionnaires paper electronic (Zoomerang) Basics of the IRB - Forms and Procedures Submit protocol electronically as a MS Word file Provide evidence of training Allow IRB time to review send attachments like consent form or surveys send front page by regular mail with signatures comments are summarized by chair and sent to PI response by PI is evaluated by the chair could be 1 week or 1 month Approval memo is sent approval is granted for up to one year renewals and amendments are permitted Basics of the IRB - Training and education IRB adopted www.citiprogram.org in early 2006 30+ modules, various groups, completion reports required of all researchers with human subjects To demonstrate experience and appreciation for human subjects protection. IRB approval - aspects A memo is issued Protection for many Compliance the investigator(s) the subjects the institution we live in a regulated world with federal regulations and institutional policies Perspectives from peers IRB members can contribute to the study suggestions to the methodology Basics of the IRB - Wrap-up These are the basics Federalwide Assurance every protocol is unique a document submitted to the federal government Cal Poly Pomona will comply with the regulations More info? www.csupomona.edu/~research/irb/ www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ members of the IRB Thank you for your interest in the IRB and its practices!