Recent Developments on Viral Vaccines Stephen K. Tyring, M.D., Ph.D., M.B.A. University of Texas Health Science Center Prevention=Public Health + Vaccination • Vaccination began with Jenner: cowpox (now vaccinia) to prevent smallpox: 1797 to 1977: first and only infectious disease eradicated • Next targeted virus: polio, but goal to eradicate polio by 2005 (50th anniversary of 1st polio vaccine) not met • Measles/mumps/rubella: now rare diseases in USA and Europe HPV • >100 types identified • 30–40 anogenital – Nononcogenic† types include: 6, 11, 40, 42, 43, 44, 54 • HPV 6 and 11 are most often associated with external genital warts. – 15–20 oncogenic types, including 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 58 • HPV 16 (54%) and HPV 18 (13%) account for the majority of worldwide cervical cancers. HPV Types 16 and 18 • HPV Types 16/18 cause 70% of Cervical cancer and > 50% of other anogenital cancers Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccines HPV-6/11/16/18 VLPs (Gardasil) • L1 capsid proteins HPV Types 6, 11, 16, 18 L1 VLPs manufactured in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) – Yeast-derived vaccines given to millions of children and adults • Formulated with alum and MPL • 3-doses: months 0, 2, 6 • Elicits neutralizing antibody to HPV- Th1 dominant CMI HPV-16 L1 VLPs Phase II/III Gardasil Studies: >23,000 female subjects Ph II―P005 (N=2,391)1 Proof of principle 16- to 23-year-old women Ph II―P007 (N=1,158)2 Dose-ranging 16- to 23-year-old women May 2000 Ph III―FUTURE I (P013) CIN/EGL 16- to 24-year-old women (N=5,455)3 Ph III―FUTURE II (P015) CIN 2/3 15- to 26-year-old women (N=12,167)4 Duration of Efficacy Registry Study Nordic Region Norwegian HPV Surveillance and Disease Burden/Population Effectiveness Study Ph III―P016, P018 (N=1,958)5,6 Safety/immunogenicity 9- to 15-year-old girls Jan 1998 Jan 2003 Jan 2004 Jan 2005 Jan 2006 Jan 2007 Jan 2008 Jan 2009 Jan 2010 FUTURE = Females United To Unilaterally Reduce Endo/Ectocervical Disease; CIN = cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; EGL = external genital lesions. 1. Mao C et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:18–27. 2. Villa LL et al. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:271–278. 3. Garland SM et al. New Engl J Med. 2007;356:1928–1943. 4. The FUTURE II Study Group. New Engl J Med. 2007;356:1915–1927. 5. Block SL et al. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2135–2145. 6. Reisinger KS et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26:201–209. Efficacy Against HPV 6/11/16/18– Disease in Per-Protocol Population FUTURE I Number of HPV 6/11/16/18–Related Cases 100 GARDASIL Placebo 90 80 65 70 60 60 50 n=2,258 n=2,279 40 30 100% efficacy 100% efficacy 20 10 n=2,241 0 n=2,261 0 0 CIN or AIS VIN/VaIN/Genital Warts 95% confidence interval: 94%–100%. CIN = cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; AIS = adenocarcinoma in situ; VIN = vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia; VaIN = vaginal Intraepithelial neoplasia; FUTURE = Females United To Unilaterally Reduce Endo/Ectocervical Disease. Garland SM et al. New Engl J Med. 2007;356:1928–1943. Number of HPV 6/11/16/18–Related Cases Efficacy Against HPV 6/11/16/18– Disease In Unrestricted Susceptible Population 100 90 GARDASIL FUTURE I 89 Placebo 81 80 70 60 n=2,684 50 40 30 20 10 n=2,684 98% efficacy n=2,667 2 95% efficacy n=2,667 4 0 CIN or AIS VIN/VaIN/Genital Warts 95% confidence interval: 92%–100% for CIN and AIS and 87%–99% for VIN/VaIN/genital warts. CIN = cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; AIS = adenocarcinoma in situ; VIN = vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia; VaIN = vaginal Intraepithelial neoplasia; FUTURE = Females United To Unilaterally Reduce Endo/Ectocervical Disease. Garland SM et al. New Engl J Med. 2007;356:1928–1943. GARDASIL® [Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (Types 6, 11, 16, 18) Recombinant Vaccine] Summary of Safety FUTURE I1 FUTURE II2 GARDA GARDA Placebo Placebo SIL SIL (n=2,672) (n=6,031) (n=2,673) (n=6,019) 86.8 85.3 77.4 75.4 84.4 83.0 77.9 75.8 Systemic AE 65.3 63.7 61.4 60.0 Serious AE 1.8 1.7 0.7 0.9 Serious vaccine-related AE <0.1 0.0 <0.1 <0.1 Discontinuation due to serious AE 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Discontinuation due to serious vaccine-related AE 0.0 0.0 0.0 <0.1 Injection-site AE –Pain GARDASIL® [Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (Types 6, 11, 16, 18) Recombinant Vaccine] Gardasil Conclusions • GARDASIL is highly safe and effective in preventing cervical cancer, CIN 2/3, AIS, and other anogenital diseases, including genital warts caused by HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 in 16- to 26-year-old women naïve to the relevant HPV types. • Widespread vaccination of young women should help reduce cervical cancer as well as other anogenital diseases related to HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18. HPV Vaccine Questions • Use of vaccine as therapy? Little information available, but has scientific basis • Use in males? Studies ongoing • Use in females <9 or >26 years? • Duration of protection? 5 years+ • Role of dermatologists? – Educate pts about the link between HPV and cervical cancer – Remind male patients about pap smears and HPV vaccine for female partners – Identify female pts at high risk or the target age group for HPV vaccine HPV Vaccine Questions • Acceptance? As a cancer vaccine>>STD vaccine • Should Gardasil be mandatory? -Reduction of morbidity -Reduction of mortality -Cost savings – Other vaccines are mandatory, but are for both sexes. – Making a vaccine mandatory increases compliance 10 fold. VARICELLA ZOSTER VIRUS • PRIMARY INFECTION: CHICKENPOX • RECURRENCE IN 20% OF OTHERWISE HEALTHY PERSONS: SHINGLES Varicella/Varicella Zoster • Attenuated vaccine,Varivax, FDA approved in 1995, is safe and effect to prevent chickenpox (two injections if over 12 months) • Varivax was FDA approved 9/6/05 to be given with MMR as “Proquad” • Immunity appears to last 25+ years • When given to adults who had chickenpox in past, it decreased the incidence of shingles by 51% and the incidence of PHN by 66% (N Engl J Med 352: 2271-2284; 2005). Zostavax, the 14-fold concentrated version of Varivax, was approved in May 2006 for prevention of herpes zoster in persons >60 years (without history of shingles) Disposition of Study Subjects Enrolled 38,546 Zoster vaccine 19,270 Terminated before end of study 793 (4.1%) Died 57 (0.3%) Withdrew 61 (0.3%) Lost to follow-up Completed study 18,359 (95.3%) Oxman MN et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2271-2284. Placebo 19,276 Terminated before end of study 792 (4.1%) Died 75 (0.4%) Withdrew 52 (0.2%) Lost to follow-up Completed study 18,357 (95.2%) Vaccine Efficacy for Incidence of Herpes Zoster 51.3% 63.9% 37.6% (95% CI) (44.2%–57.6%) (ND) (ND) Incidence of herpes zoster Efficacy 14 P<.001 Vaccine 12 Placebo 10 8 6 4 2 0 All 60-69 Age (years) ND=not determined. Oxman MN et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2271-2284. 70 Vaccine Efficacy for Incidence of PHN Efficacy 66.5% 65.7% 66.8% (95% CI) (47.5%–79.2%) (20.4%–86.7%) (43.3%–81.3%) Incidence of PHN 2.5 2.0 Vaccine P<.001 Placebo 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 All Subjects 60-69 Age (years) Oxman MN et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2271-2284. 70 Questions regarding Zostavax • Use in persons under 60 years? • Use in persons with history of shingles? • Use in persons without a history of chickenpox? • Use as therapy for shingles or PHN? • Use in immunocompromised patients? • Implications for therapeutic HSV vaccine? Safety of Zostavax • Recipients of Zostavax had higher rates of local reactions (erythema, swelling, etc.) than did recipients of placebo • Recipients of Zostavax and placebo did not differ in systemic adverse events Will Zostavax Decrease the Prevalence of Herpes Zoster? • • • • • 51% efficacy; duration of benefit unknown FDA approval for persons > 60 years Insurance coverage? Low compliance with recommended vaccines Contraindicated in immunocompromised (IC) patients • Elderly and IC populations increasing • Decreased wild type VZV: less immune boosting New Genital Herpes Disease HSV 1-/2- Subjects Men Percentage without GHD 100 95 95 90 90 Placebo Vaccine 85 0 10 Women 100 Placebo Vaccine 85 20 30 Observation period [months] 0 10 20 30 Observation period [months] Vaccine Efficacy p-value Vaccine Efficacy p-value 32.2% 0.47 74.4% 0.02 Future Vaccines: HIV • • • • >40 million persons in the world with HIV >20 antiretroviral drugs, but no cures First HIV vaccine safe, but not effective Many HIV vaccines in Phase II trials: most promising was replication attenuated adenovirus carrying recombinant pol, nef and gag; over 6000 persons vaccinated: safe and immunogenic, but it did not show clinical protection What’s New in Prevention of Viral Diseases? 1. FDA approved vaccines are much safer than the viruses they prevent 2. Vaccines should be used in combination with public health 3. VZV vaccines are safe and effective in prevention of primary VZV (Varivax) as well as herpes zoster (Zostavax) 4. The HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine (Gardasil) is safe and effective for prevention of genital warts and anogenital malignancy QUESTIONS?