Sinus reaction during carotid stenting according to the carotid lesion

advertisement

Sinus reaction during carotid stenting according to the carotid lesion type

Jong Lim Kim , Dae Chul Suh, Jin-Ho Shin, Dong Ho Hyun, Ha Young Lee,

Deok Hee Lee, Choong Gon Choi, Sang Joon Kim, Jong Sung Kim

Departments of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology , Department of

Neurology, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine,

Asan Medical Center, Korea

Carotid sinus reaction or hemodynamic instability

· Carotid sinus reaction

Post- and peri-procedural hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg)

Bradycardia (HR <50 beats/sec)

Heart rate fluctuation (>20 beats/sec)

* Asystole (≥ 3 sec) and hypotension (SBP ≤ 90 mm Hg)

Leisch F, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv . 2003

* Hypotension (SBP < 90 mm Hg) or bradycardia (HR < 60 beats/min)

Gupta R, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006

Carotid sinus reaction during carotid artery stenting

Carotid sinus reaction occurs frequently (40%) during carotid sinus stent

Bifurcation location of stenosis is the most important predictor of carotid sinus reaction

* Carotid sinus reaction

Asystole (≥ 3 sec)

Hypotension (SBP ≤ 90 mmHg)

* Carotid stenosis location

Bifurcation

Ostial

Isolated ICA

Leisch F, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv . 2003

Carotid sinus reaction during carotid artery stenting

Hemodynamic disturbances was not related to carotid stenosis location

* Hemodynamic disturbances

Hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg)

Bradycardia (HR < 50 beats/min)

Heart rate fluctuation (> 20 beats/min)

Hypertension (SBP > 160 mmHg)

* Carotid stenosis location

Apical

Body

Park ST, et al. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010

I like to show that carotid sinus reaction can be associated with stenosis location

Apical type stenosis in the left carotid bulb

No carotid sinus reaction

Body type stenosis in the right carotid bulb

Marked carotid sinus reaction

Carotid sinus

(anatomy & physiology)

· Ill-defined dilatation at the origin of the internal carotid artery

D Heath. Thorax.

1983

· Monitoring and regulation of blood pressure

Michael Doumas, et al. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets.

2009

Carotid sinus

(Embryology)

Common carotid artery and proximal part of internal carotid artery

- Formed by remodeling of the third arch artery (yellow)

Baroreceptors (arrow) of the glossopharyngeal nerve

- Distributed in proximal portion of internal carotid artery (carotid sinus)

Yoko Kameda. Cell Tissue Res.

2009

Carotid sinus nerve

· Originating from the glossopharyngeal (IX) nerve

· Located in loose tissue close to the ICA wall

Run parallel to or together with vagus nerve

· Ended in both carotid sinus & carotid body

Toorop RJ, et al. J Vasc Surg.

2009

IX, glossopharyngeal nerve

X, vagus nerve

P, pharyngeal branches

S, sympathetic trunk

Baroreflex

· Major contributor to the homeostatic system of blood pressure control

Michael Doumas, et al. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets.

2009

· Afferent fibres from carotid sinus baroreceptors join the glossopharyngeal nerve and project to the nucleus tractus solitarii in the dorsal medulla, and in turn projects to efferent cardiovascular neurones in the medulla and spinal cord

Timmers HJ et al. J Physiol.

2003

Arterial baroreflex loops

Carotid sinus baroreceptors

→ glossopharyngeal nerve

→ medullary centres (nucleus tractus solitarii)

→ sympathetic and parasympathetic fibres to heart and blood vessels

Materials and Methods

Prospective analysis

2007.01 ~ 2009.6

95 patients who underwent carotid stenting

M : F = 82 : 12

Mean age : 69 years (38-89 years)

Symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥ 50% (NASCET criteria)

Materials and Methods

Transient sinus reaction : <3 hours

Delayed sinus reaction : 3~24 hours

Analyzed angiographic or neurointerventional findings

- Location of plaque : apical vs. body

- Length of maximum stenosis from the ICA ostium

- Lesion length

- Stenosis degree

- Calcification

- Balloon diameter

- Balloon pressure

- Stent length

- Residual stenosis

- Hyperperfusion

- Restenosis

Results

Comparison of Significant Difference of Transient Sinus Reaction

Lesion type

Apical

Body

Lesion length

Length of maximum stenosis fr om the ICA ostium*

Stenosis degree

Calcification (yes)

Balloon diameter (mm)

<3hr SR(+)

7

16

16.77

7.74

75.87

6

5.23

<3hr SR(-)

49

23

18.30

12.79

74.04

15

5.37

P-valve

0.001

0.26

0.004

0.968

0.577

0.283

Balloon pressure (ATM)

Stent length

8.00

34.35

8.29

34.03

0.464

0.728

Residual stenosis 23.52

19.86

0.295

* Stepwise logistic regression to eliminate confounding factor reveals that length is true independent factor (P = 0.002)

Results

< 3 h

SBP>160

3 - 24 h

1m

Event

6m

Hyperperfusion

Restenosis

Apical (n=56) Body (n=39)

0

6

1

12

7

5

1

2

3

8

5

0

P-valve

0.914

1

0.076

0.411

0.464

0.302

Case 1

Age/sex

Location

Transient sinus reaction

Lesion type

Length of maximum stenosis from the ICA ostium* (mm)

M/63 right

+

Body

2.24

Case 2

Age/sex

Location

Transient sinus reaction

Lesion type

Length of maximum stenosis from the ICA ostium* (mm)

M/77 right

-

Apical

14.53

Case 3

Age/sex

Location

Transient sinus reaction

Lesion type

Length of maximum stenosis from the ICA ostium* (mm)

Hyperperfusion

M/85 right

-

Apical

16.67

+

Summary and conclusion

1. Sinus reaction in carotid stenting is different in two distinct locations, body and apical portion of carotid bulb

2. Body lesion type was more vulnerable to sinus reaction than apical lesion type

① Related to anatomical baroreceptor disposition in carotid sinus

* Baroreceptors are located in the carotid sinus of carotid bulb

Such embryological implication appeared to affect carotid bulb lesion type

② Induced preventive effect for high blood pressure which might contribute to hyperperfusion syndrome

→ Less common to hyperperfusion syndrome

3. Apical lesion type had higher event rate than body lesion type

① Associated with more common periprocedural hypertension

→ Needs more careful management of blood pressure control for apical lesion type after carotid stenting

Download