CHAPTER 10 – DATABASE CONCEPTS This chapter discusses the basic concepts needed to understand and use simple databases. While the spreadsheet’s power lies in its ability to analyze data and relate values by creating formulas that reference other cells, a database management system (DBMS) is designed to relate groups of information and to store, retrieve, and manipulate that information in an efficient manner. DATA, DATABASE, AND DBMS DEFINING A DATABASE: Data is a numeric or alphanumeric group of symbols, such as 223197001. When we give meaning to data it becomes information. For example, 223197001 has no meaning unless we are told it is a social security number. A piece of information becomes even more meaningful when it is related to another piece of information: 223197001 is John Smith’s social security number. A database is a collection of related data stored in a well-defined structure. Databases exist in both computerized and non-computerized formats. Examples of databases include a categorized file cabinet, the telephone book, a list of alphabetized songs on your iPod, or a listing of all students and classes at a university. Databases are managed by software tools known as Database Management Systems (DBMS). Examples of DBMS’s are Microsoft Access, FoxPro, Oracle, and Sybase, among many others. Just as a word processor (e.g., Microsoft Word) is used to create and edit documents, a DBMS is used to create and manage databases. A RELATIONAL DBMS Each DBMS is based on a database model that defines the way the information should be organized and accessed. The three most commonly used models are the hierarchical, network, and relational. Of these the most flexible is the relational model, which is what we will be discussing in this chapter. The relational model represents data and relationships using a collection of tables, as seen in Figure 1. Each table is organized into categories of data known as fields. The table on the left side of Figure 1 stores information regarding patients, including patient identification number, name, address, and the doctor number of the physician treating this patient. Patient# AC34 BH72 BL12 EA45 FD89 Name Marsh, Allen Verns, Julie Lee, Thang Orwich, Robin Ferb, Michael Street 134 Central 415 Main 12 Mountain 867 Ridge 34 Crestview City Berridge Berls Denton Fort Stewart Berridge State FL FL FL FL FL ZipCode DoctorID 60330 21 60349 24 60412 24 60336 27 60330 21 Related field on tables DoctorID 21 24 27 34 Last Name Kerry Reeves Fernandez Lee First Name Alyssa Camden Jaime Jan Figure 1 Page 1 A relational database many contain more than one table and these tables may themselves be related to each other. The example in Figure 1 contains a second table with information about each doctor. Notice that each doctor is identified by a unique DoctorID which can be related to the DoctorID on the patient table in each patient record. In addition to tables, most modern day DBMS’s include other objects which allow the user store, retrieve, and manipulate data. In MS Access these objects include the following: Queries – “questions” that retrieve information from a database. Queries are structures to sort, filter, and select specific information. Forms – structures for displaying data that allow a user to view information from and input information in one or more objects (tables, queries, etc.). Reports – structures for written output of data which again allow one to combine information from one or more objects and view both details and summaries. Macros & Program Modules – program code to perform specific actions. A RELATIONAL DATABASE EXAMPLE – SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT The diagram in Figure 2 represents part of an Order Entry and Inventory control system. The system includes forms, queries, and reports for data entry and retrieval. The tables store information regarding product inventory, vendors, customers and orders. Forms: Order Transactions New Vendors & New Customers New Products Shipments Program Modules Tables: Current Inventory Vendor List Orders Order Details Program Modules Reports & Queries Daily Ship List Customer Invoices Accounts Payable Customer Accounts Output File: Inventory Low Message Figure 2 The flow of information in the database for a typical order that might be phoned in by a customer may be as follows: Page 2 The order entry clerk would enter the order into an Order Transaction form. Once the order is input, a predefined program module would take this data and enter it into the appropriate tables: e.g., Order Details table, Customer Accounts table, etc. A Daily Pick List report will be printed for the fork lift operator in the closest warehouse and customer invoice report printed to be included with the shipment. The inventory table will be updated at this warehouse with this reduction in quantity; if insufficient inventory remains, an order report would automatically be emailed to the supplier to order more inventory. As you can see, a company’s supply chain system using DBMS software is an extremely valuable tool in modern day business. This course will discuss some simple database concepts as well as how to design and query a simple database. The mechanics of setting up tables, reports, and forms is covered in the course textbook. Setting up program modules/macros is beyond the scope of this course. ACCESS TABLES: RECORDS AND FIELDS DEFINING FIELDS AND RECORDS OF A TABLE The basic component of an Access database is the table. All other objects are based on the structure and data within the tables. Each table is organized into a specified set of ordered categories, or fields. Figure 3 is part of a table named Customers. The fields in the Customer table include SSN, First Name, Last Name, Address, City, State, and Postal Code. Related information is input into the table as records. Each record contains related values for each table field. For example, the first record in this table contains Jane Doe’s SSN, her last name, her first name, her address, her city, her state, and her postal code in that order. Jane Doe’s record does not contain John Black’s SSN or Mary Park’s postal code. In addition, the third piece of data in any record in this table will always be the Last Name as the order of values in each record is the same as the order of the fields in the table. Table: Customers Customers: Table SSN 070-13-2976 121-78-8233 273-49-2211 873-38-3923 Primary Key First Name Jane John Richard Mary Last Name Doe Black Taylor Parks Address 123 W. Lane Av 34 Grand Av 99 King Dr 54 Elm St City Columbus Seattle Chicago Houston State OH WA IL TX Postal Code 43210 90012 60638 34167 Record Field Figure 3 A table is frequently pictured as a collection of records in which fields are columns and records are rows. A Data Base Management Systems is not limited to this physical view of a table. Page 3 However, for purposes of abstracting the actual processes DBMS systems perform, this table view is helpful. In Access this view can be invoked from the Fields ribbon. In Access 2010, the Fields ribbon allows the user to not only view and input data, but to add new fields and to specify field properties. Figure 4 illustrates the Access window with the Accounts table open to the Fields ribbon visible. Fields Ribbon Views button – switch from datasheet to design Navigation Pane – lists database objects Record Selection Buttons Figure 4 View buttons FIELD PROPERTIES Fields are defined by field properties. The diagram in Figure 5 shows the design view of an Access table where field properties may be specified. The most common field properties are: Data type: The type of information stored. e.g., Number, Text, Currency, Yes/No (Boolean), Memo, etc. Field size: The number of characters for text or the precision of numbers. e.g., numbers can be integer, long integer, single precision, double precision, decimal, byte, etc. Format: For numbers, the format specifies display properties such as currency style, scientific notation, etc. Figure 5 Page 4 Page 4 Input Mask: Predefined formats for displaying the field, such as social security numbers with dashes displayed but not stored, etc. Caption: The title that is displayed instead of the field name. Default Value: A value that will be used if this field is left blank when a record is entered. Validation Rule: A list of possible values or range of acceptable values for this field. Required: If selected, when entering or modifying a record this field must be entered or the computer display an error message. It is advantageous to specify field properties both to make the table easier to use and more efficient. For example, each time a new record is created, Access allocates memory (bytes) based on the field size specified. That is, an amount of memory the size of the field is set aside, whether it is needed or not. If a specific text field only requires three characters and the size specified as 50, each record will waste the space of 47 characters. If each character takes two bytes of memory, 94 bytes of storage space would be wasted per record. A large database with 100,000 records would be wasting 9.4 million bytes! WHAT FIELD TYPE SHOULD YOU USE? A social security number consists of 9 digits. What field type would be best suited to store this data? Using a number gives the user the ability to perform arithmetic calculations, while text does not. Will it ever be necessary to perform arithmetic calculations on these values? Probably not. So a number type is not needed, but can it be used? Consider the social security number 003278343. If this value is typed into a Number field, what value will be stored? Try it and you’ll find that the value 3278343 is displayed – the leading zeros are discarded. Does that matter? In the case of social security numbers, this matters greatly. The user will not want to have to “add” the zeros to print out a person’s data in a report. If the value was stored as text, the zeros would remain part of the data stored. Thus the best field choice for a social security number is a text field. This same logic applies to zip codes and even phone numbers. UNIQUELY IDENTIFYING TABLE RECORDS Imagine a large bank with over 100,000 accounts; can a person’s last name alone be used to identify the contents of their bank account? Is it possible that two customers have the same last name, or even that one customer has multiple accounts? If such a customer made a deposit to their account how do we know which account to use? Obviously this is a very realistic situation and must be taken into consideration when designing a database. To solve this problem, database designers include a field in tables that uniquely identifies each record. The Customers table presented in Figure 3 contains a unique social security number, SSN. Since no one person has the same social security number, this can be used to uniquely identify a person/record in the table. A field that uniquely identifies a record is Page 5 referred to as a primary key field. The primary key cannot be blank nor can it contain any duplicate values (two records have the same value for the primary key field). Will SSN always be a good primary key field to use? Not necessarily, it will depend on the situation. Would an SSN uniquely identify a bank account? If a customer can have multiple accounts (e.g., for example one for savings and one for checking) then the SSN is not a unique identifier. To solve this problem the bank may use a unique account number, as seen in Figure 4. A combination of fields can also be used to uniquely identify a record. Consider a table of transactions a combination of account number and transaction time might be used to uniquely identify a record, though normally these types of tables would be setup with a separate transaction number. You’ve probably used these types of numbers in other applications, such as when you look up an airline reservation or track a FedEx package. A primary key field is not always necessary; not every table will have a single-field primary key or any primary key at all. However, every relationship between tables must have some field or combination of fields that uniquely identify records in one of the tables. Otherwise, for example, it could not be established exactly which transaction will go to which account. When using a combination of fields as a key, additional fields are known as secondary, tertiary, etc. fields. A possible combination of fields to uniquely identify a bank customer could be the first name, birth date, and phone number to include with last name. In this course we will use single primary key fields to uniquely identify records. In documentation a table is normally listed by its name followed by an ordered list of fields in parenthesis. The primary key is underlined. The Accounts table would be written in this notation as follows: Accounts(acct#, SSN, LastName, FirstName, address, City, State, Postal Code) This description of the Accounts table is also known as a relational schema. RELATING TABLES IN A RELATIONAL DBMS Tables are structured into records of related data organized into ordered fields. Records are uniquely identified by a primary key field. By uniquely defining a field such as an account number we can find data corresponding to that account number that may reside in other tables, such as transactions made on that account. In this section we will explore relating data between tables. DEFINITION: FOREIGN KEYS Databases can contain multiple tables where a relationship between tables is established by correspondence between fields. The field used to relate two tables is referred to as the foreign key. Consider the two tables in Figure 6. The first table lists an account number, the name of the person listed on the account, and their address. The second table lists bank deposits identified by the depositor’s name. Can each deposit be related to an account using the Name as the foreign key between the two tables? Is Smith’s $100 deposit for the Smith on Main Street or the Smith on Cherry Lane? Clearly using a field that has duplicate values on both tables does not work very well. Page 6 Acct# 1 2 3 Name Smith Jones Smith Address 123 Main St. 45 Elm St 27 Cherry Lane ? Name Smith Smith Jones $Deposit 25 100 25 Figure 6 Figure 7 contains a modified version of the second table that includes the account number instead of name. Can each deposit be uniquely matched to a single account using the account number as the foreign key? If the account number is the primary key of the first table, the transactions on the second table can related to a specific account. Thus, a foreign key must be a primary key on at least one of the tables for a relationship to be valid. Acct# 1 2 3 Name Smith Jones Smith Address 123 Main St. 45 Elm St 27 Cherry Lane Acct# Acct# 1 3 2 $Deposit 25 100 25 Figure 7 This type of relationship where many values from one table (many deposits) can match to a single value on the related table (one acct#) is referred to as a Many to One relationship (or a One to Many relationship). An equally valid relationship would be a One to One relationship where each record of one table corresponds to at most one record in the second table. A One to One relationship occurs when each foreign key is the primary key on both tables. Page 7 REQUIREMENTS OF A VALID FOREIGN KEY It is not required that the field names on each table match. Conversely, two fields that have the same name do not imply there is a foreign key relationship. The following rules define what is required for a relationship between two tables to be valid: 1. The foreign key must be a primary key on at least one of the tables. 2. The field types for the foreign key field must be the same on both tables. 3. The information being related must be the same. The first requirement has already been discussed. What about the second requirement, what does it mean the field types must be the same? Consider the foreign key in the previous example. What field type is the acct# field? The designer had a choice of using Number or Text. Either would have worked, though one may have been more efficient that the other. What matters is consistency between the two tables. If the acct# field is an Integer number on the first table and Text on the second table, Access will not be able to match the foreign key records. Why should it make a difference which data type is specified? After all, you can’t see the type of the field when looking at the information in the datasheet view. However, remember the data is being stored in memory of a computer as a series of high/low level electrical charges that we express as zeros and ones. The text representation for the digit 1 may be a series of 32 zeros and ones while the Integer representation for the number 1 may be a series of 16 zeros and ones. These two values are NOT EQUAL and thus computer will not recognize the two values as matching. What about the third requirement for a valid foreign key, what does “information being related must be the same” mean? Consider two tables, where each has account numbers. Table 1 contains the account numbers at First City Bank and Table 2 contains the bank numbers at Union Trust bank. While the fields may have the same name and type, there is no relationship between account 1234 at First City Bank and account 1234 at Union Trust bank. Relating the records between these two tables based on account number would be meaningless. Page 8 MANY TO ONE TO MANY RELATIONSHIPS In the following example another table has been added to the database to keep track of withdrawals. The schema of the table is Withdrawals(Acct#, Amount). Can the Withdrawals table be related to the Deposits table from the previous example? Deposits Acct# 256887 256887 654887 Amount $50. $75 $32 ? Withdrawals Acct# 256777 654887 256887 Amount $25 $100 $25 Figure 8 The fields Acct# (table Deposits) and Acct# (table Withdrawals) both represent a customer’s account and we can assume they both are specified as the same data type. Yet in neither case are these fields primary. There may be many instances of an account number on the deposits table (e.g., 256887) and many instances of that same account number of the withdrawals table. However, a deposit does not correspond to a withdrawal (and vice versa). Thus, the account number would not be a valid foreign key. This type of relationship is referred to as a Many to Many relationship. Can we relate the tables using the Amount fields? While the Amounts fields have the same name, they represent different information. On the deposits table Amount is the money into an account. On the withdrawal table Amount is the money out of an account; it does not make sense to relate these fields. In addition, it possible that two transactions contain the same value in the amount field, so neither of these fields is primary. But certainly it makes sense that somehow the deposits into an account are related to the withdrawals from that account. To solve this dilemma databases are designed with intermediate tables, in this case the Accounts table. In the Accounts table the account number is the primary key and can be related to both the Deposits table and the Withdrawals table, as seen in Figure 9. This changes the relationships so that there are now two Many to One relationships. The relationship between three such is referred to as a Many to One to Many relationship. Another possible database design would be to combine the Deposits and Withdrawal tables into one Transactions table, since the fields are essentially the same, account number and a monetary value. In the latter type of design, deposits would need to be entered as positive values and withdrawals as negative values. Figure 9 Page 9 DEFINING RELATIONSHIPS IN AN ACCESS DATABASE Just as our DBMS software will allow us to define a table and enter records, it also allows us to define relationships between tables. The Relationships tool can be launched from the Relationship button on the Database Tools ribbon in the Show/Hide group, as shown in Figure 10. Figure 11 shows the relationships view that displays the relationship between the Accounts and a Transactions tables. Figure 10 Figure 11 When the relationships view is first launched in a new database it will be blank. Each table must be individually added from the Show Table box, as seen in Figure 12. To open the Show Table dialog box, right-click anywhere in the relationships window. Once the box is open, click on the Tables Tab (or Query tab for a query) and select the name of the table to be added and then click then Add button (or double click on the table name). Repeat the process to add additional tables. Figure 13 illustrates the Relationship window with the Accounts and Transactions tables added but not yet related. To relate tables follow these three steps: Figure 12 Move the mouse to the foreign key field listed on one of the tables. While holding down the left mouse button, drag the cursor to the corresponding field on the second table. The cursor will change into a circle with a line through it during this process. When you reach the corresponding field, release the mouse button. A line should appear that connects the two fields, similar Figure 13 to the picture originally shown in Figure 11. Once all relationships have been defined, close the window and select the Yes button to save. Repeat this process to make any additions/changes to the relationships window. Relationships can be deleted by clicking on the relationship line and then pressing the Delete key. Page 10 USING TABLE TO MANIPULATE DATA One of the main reasons for using DBMS software is the ability to quickly and easily locate specific data or sets of data. Within an Access table it is possible to quickly and easily locate data using the Filter and Sort tools. To understand how a database finds records, we will also briefly explore the concept of search routines and Indexing. APPLYING DATA FILTERS The filter tool can be used in the datasheet view to display selected records of a table. A filter allows us to specify criteria in a field or fields and show only those records that meet the criteria. Using the filter tool we can list only those people who live in Columbus, those people whose last name is Jones, or even only people whose last name is Jones and live in Columbus. The mechanics of setting up filters from the datasheet view of a table can be found in any of the stepby-step instructions in the course text. The Filter tools can be found on the Sort and Filter group of the Home tab (Figure 14). They include: The Filter button allows the user to sort or choose one listed item as a filter criterion. This list will vary depending on which field of the database is currently selected. To select a field, simply place the cursor on any record in the field to be filtered Figure 14 The Selection button applies the filter using the current selection as the criteria. If the highlighted “cell” is on record 3 in the account field and that value is 123, then 123 will be the selection criteria. After clicking on the Selection button, options to select records based on this filter will appear including: equals, does not equal, greater than, etc. The Advanced button gives the user several options for filtering data, including Filter by Form which enables criteria to be defined across multiple fields. To remove the filter, click the Toggle Filter button. This ability to find records that meet a specific set of criteria will be greatly extended in the next chapter using a database query. Page 11 SORTING TABLES From the Datasheet Table View in Access, tables can also be sorted. Using the sort tool, select a field and a sort type (ascending or descending). The records will be temporarily rearranged based on this order. Sorts can be performed by clicking on the field to be sorted and then selecting either the ascending or descending sort buttons in the Sort & Filter group of the Home tab. The buttons for sort-ascending and sort-descending look like this: If the table is not saved using the Save button, the table will revert back to the original record order when reopened. Sorting is an efficient tool for helping to retrieve specific records. More advanced sorts using multiple sort keys can be done using a query. INDEXING TABLES AND SEARCH SCHEMES INDEXING TABLES There are also methods by which DBMS systems can index your files to create a cross reference to the table records based on a specific sorting method. Since data is usually stored on magnetic disks in a linear fashion, file indexing combined with search schemes make it more efficient for the computer to retrieve records, especially in databases with millions of records. Several indices can be setup for the same table, allowing for efficient searching for a variety of fields. For example, the bank can search by account number or by last name, depending on the information the customer has provided. These searches may always be done whether or not a table is indexed; searches over a large number of records are more efficient when using indices. A LINEAR SEARCH ROUTINE As previously mentioned, one of the reasons to sort tables is to allow for more efficient data retrieval. For example, imagine a dictionary that had words listed randomly. In order to find a specific word one needs to systematically go through each word, one by one, until the desired word is found. This is known as a linear search. On average, a linear search will have to look at the number of items in a table divided by two in order to find a specific piece data: it might be the first word in this randomly organized dictionary, but then again it might be the last. Why is efficient data handling so important? First let us understand how data is stored and retrieved by a DBMS like MS Access. Recall that when working with an Excel spreadsheet, the entire file is loaded from the disk drive onto the computer’s RAM (random access memory). So working with spreadsheet data is usually extremely fast, but the size of files are limited by the RAM of the computer. In fact, one notices a significant slow down of operation speed as the workbook file increases in size. In contrast, most relational databases do not load all of the tables, queries, reports, etc. directly into RAM. They load only the table of contents of the objects. To process information from one or more objects, just those objects are loaded into RAM. Thus, a DBMS can handle much larger quantities of data. In fact, many large databases systems have millions of records. Page 12 When running a DBMS, the computer is not just processing information but continually retrieving and writing data to and from secondary memory (usually a magnetic hard drive). While a computer’s RAM can process information at very fast speeds, searching for specific information on a disk drive and retrieving and/or writing to the drive is a much more time consuming process. If a file is stored in random order, as with the un-alphabetized dictionary, it will require the computer to look at the disk many more times to find the information that we want than if the file was sorted. Consequently, computer scientists are interested in how to search for information more efficiently. THE BINARY SEARCH There are many different search schemes that can be used with indexed files to speed up retrieval of information. Most of us are all familiar with the alphabetical sort routine that divides textual information into 26 groups based on the first letter of each item, and then further subdivides each group by the second letter, etc. The search routine to retrieve information from an alphabetical list, such as a dictionary, is to identify the first letter of the text and match it to the correct group and then continue doing this with the second letter and so on until a match has been identified. A similarly efficient scheme which can be used with numerical data is known as a binary search routine. A binary search routine is much more efficient than a linear search in finding information. In Figure 15 records have been sorted by the indexed field, ID#, in ascending order. To find the record for id#606147775 using a binary search routine the computer would do the following: 1. First go to the middle record (not the average value!) of the list and check to see if the value (id#) equals the value of the middle record. If this is true, the record has been found. If not, continue to step 2. 2. If the value is greater than the value of this middle record, ignore all records from the beginning of the list until this midpoint. The remaining list will contain only records from the midpoint until the end of the list. Set a new midpoint for this new list and begin again at step 1. 3. If the value is less than the middle record, ignore all records from the midpoint to the end of the list. The new list will contain only records from the beginning of the list until the midpoint. Set a new midpoint for this new list and begin again at step 1. ID# 123456789 139555002 157745969 178301771 201529842 227776183 257436001 290951508 328824082 371616449 419975418 474621100 536370683 606147775 684995818 774094122 874775203 988544806 lname Sommer Suyama Lebihan Berglund Trujillo Moos Citeaux Callahan Moreno Fuller Dodsworth Leverling Hardy Anders Peacock King Davolio Buchanan fname Martín Michael Laurence Christina Ana Hanna Frédérique Laura Antonio Andrew Anne Janet Thomas Maria Margaret Robert Nancy Steven Figure 15 4. This process will continue until a match is found or all records have been searched (in which case the value does not appear in the list). Page 13 Applying this algorithm to this specific example: Since 606147775 is greater than 328824082, consider only those records starting with 328824082 until the end of the table. The midpoint of this new list is 536370683. Is 606147775 greater than 536370683? Yes. So now consider only those records from 536370683 until the end of the table. The midpoint of this new list from 536370683 to 988544806 is 684995818. Is 606147775 greater than 684995818? No. So our new list will be from 536370683 to 684995818. The midpoint of this list is 606147775. Since this midpoint now matches our search value the desired record has been found. This search only looked at three different records in the table. A linear search on average would have looked at 19/2 or 10.5 records. This is a significant improvement. To illustrate the significant difference between linear and binary search routines, consider a situation where instead of 19 records, the list had a million records. If the list isn’t sorted by the value we’re searching for, in the worst case we would have to look at all one million records. If the list is sorted and we use a binary search, we would only have to look at thirty one. If the list had 10 million records and we could use a binary search, the worst case is still only looking at thirty five records. A binary search is only one of many different methods computer scientist use to improve the efficiency of retrieving data. There are computer science courses devoted solely to this topic. This discussion is only meant to provide you an appreciation of the processes involved and an insight into the importance and complexity of the topic. Page 14 DESIGNING YOUR OWN DATABASE The design of a complex database management system can take weeks, months or even years to complete, involving thousands of man-hours of effort by a team of computer scientists and management. You may someday be part of one of these teams, or you may just be trying to create a small database to keep track of a guest list for a large party. Regardless of the size and complexity of your database, there are several things one must consider before creating a database. As with a spreadsheet, the critical step in designing an effective database is to plan it. Think about the following: What data objects are present? Customers and account transactions are each table objects in our sample database. How is the data related? In our sample database, we have related these objects by a foreign key field (SSN). What information will be generated from the data? Will we need to design queries and/or reports to list of all accounts for owners who live in Columbus, or summarize transactions by account? When setting up even the simplest of tables there are several factors to consider: Tables should be divided into inseparable fields. For example, if an address field contains the entire address (street, city, state and zip code) it may not be possible to sort our list by state, or to display only those records within a specific zip code. In this case we may want to define each of the address elements as separate fields. Appropriate Field types should be selected with respect to the type of data being stored. Appropriate field sizes should be used to minimize data storage. Field properties should be defined to aid in data input (validity, defaults, etc.). Each fact should change in only one place (except the foreign key and primary key fields). If a fact appears in more than one record of a table, it should probably be defined in another table. Calculations shouldn’t be part of the table. In subsequent chapter we will discuss how to perform calculations using the Access Query tool. Appropriate primary keys should be selected that enable relationship structures between tables of information. Obviously this list can be greatly expanded. In fact there are both undergraduate and graduate courses devoted to learning how to design, build and maintain databases. But the list should give you some idea as to the types of things that need to be considered. Page 15 A SAMPLE DATABASE We will use the sample database in Figure 16 to illustrate the concepts introduced in this chapter. This database contains three tables. The table designs and sample data are discussed below. After the database structures are examined, database relationships will be defined. This will require identifying what fields can be used as primary keys and what foreign key relationships exist in our database. Figure 16 -Club Database – Database View of Tables Page 16 CLUB DATABASE TABLES: The schema for the club database is as follows: Members(ID#, FirstName, LastName, PhoneNumber, City, State, Active, JoinDate ) This table is a membership list of all active and retired members. The ID# is a text data type and has been identified as the primary key for this table. The Active field is a “Yes/No” Boolean data type field (a yes indicates this is an active member). The Join Date field is a date data type field. All other fields in the Members table are Text. Note that when typing a Boolean field into an Access table, the column is usually displayed as check box. In this case, a check indicates that this is an active member; no check indicates a past or retired member. The actual values stored are the Boolean values. If an Access table with a Boolean field is copied into an Excel spreadsheet, the Boolean values are translated to True/False cell entries. Officers(ID#, PositionYear, Position ) A list of all past and present officers of the organization and the year and office held. ID# and Position are type text, Year is type Number. Dues(ID#, DuesPaid, DuesDate ) This table contains records of member transactions. The amount of dues paid (full or partial payment) is entered in the DuesPaid field. Dues for the year are $100 for active members; retired members are not charged dues. Additional contributions are recorded in the Donations field. The ID# field is type text and Dues-Paid and Donation fields are type currency. A member may make any number of transactions. Donations(ID#, DonationType, DonationDate, EventType ) Additional contributions are recorded in the Donations field. The ID# field is type text and the Donation field is type currency. The EvenType field records the avenue in which the donation was collected; silent auction, raffle, etc. A member may make any number of donations. Events(EventType, EventDescription) The EventType and EventDescription are used to track the event in which the donation was made. Notice that the data types of the fields have been defined here. Later when setting up your own databases, you will need to pay attention to the field types. As already discussed, field names need not match to setup a Relationship, but field types must match. Page 17 CLUB DATABASE RELATIONSHIPS: So how can one determine from these tables whether Mr. Aston has paid his dues? Notice that the Finance table identifies payments by ID# and not by name. The actual names of Members can only be found on the Members table, and from there it can be determined that Mr. Aston’s ID# is 345. Can ID# on the Members table be related to records with the same ID# on the Finance table? Before answering this question we need to understand the relational database structure. As we learned in the previous sections, in order to relate two tables a common/valid foreign key must exist. Such a relationship requires the following: The same information is being related. The id# 2557892 is not related to the telephone# 2557892 just because they look the same (unless telephone number is actually being used as the member ID#). Fields must be of the same field type. The membership id can be either a Text field or as a Number field. When it is a Text field, the characters ‘645’ are stored as their ASCII 8 bit equivalent for 6 then 4 then 5. When it is a Number field, the quantity 645 is saved as its numerical binary equivalent. The computer does not recognize these two representations as the same and cannot match them. The field must be primary on at least one of the tables. Also recall that the same field name in two tables does not imply a relationship exists between them. Conversely, foreign keys can be setup between two fields that do not have the same name as long as they meet the requirements of being related fields. Now, keeping these rules in mind, consider the sample database: The Members Table has an easily identifiable primary key which is the member ID#. Looking at the Finances and Officers tables it appears that this same identification is being used on both the Finance table (ID#) and on the Officers table (ID#). Since it is primary on the Members table it can be used as a foreign key to set up the relationship from the Members table to the Finances table and from the Members table to the Officers table. Can the Finances table be directly related to the Officers table by this ID? No, since neither ID# fields are primary on their respective tables. The Dues Table does not contain a clear primary key field. If it is assumed that a member may make more than one payment of the same amount, there is no field or field combination that will uniquely identify a record on the Dues Table. The Donations Table does not contain a clear primary key field. If it is assumed that a member may make more than one donation of the same amount, there is no field or field combination that will uniquely identify a record on the Donations Table. The Officers Table also does not contain a primary key field. Page 18 The Events Table has a primary key which is the EventType. Looking at the Events Table you can see that each donation is connected to a specific event, thus the EventType field on the Events table is a primary key for that relationship, and the EventType field on the Donations table is the foreign key in the relationship between the two tables. The resulting Relationships are diagrammed in Figure 17. Foreign Key: on Dues Primary Key: none Foreign Key: ID# on Dues Table ∞ Members Primary key: ID# 1 ID# Officers Table Officers 1 ∞ Primary Key: none 1 Foreign Key: Figure 17 ID# on Donations Table ∞ Donations Primary Key: none Foreign Key: ∞ 1 Events Primary Key: EventType EventType on Donations Table The resulting Relationships as shown in MS Access (Figure 18) Figure 18 Page 19 ENFORCING REFERENCIAL DATA INTEGRITY A new transaction needs to be recorded on the Officers table as follows: ID# Year Position 999 2007 President This new transaction contains the ID# 999. Notice that there is no member ID# 999 listed on the Members table. Is this a good idea? Certainly it makes sense that not all members will serve as officers, but can the organization have a president who is not listed as a member? If the membership list contains all members, where ID# is the primary key, it makes sense that related tables, such as the Officers table, only contain member ID# numbers for persons listed on the Members table. This concept of limiting entries made in a foreign key field to those items listed in the primary key field of the related table is known as Referential Data Integrity. In Access you can choose to physically enforce Referential Data Integrity in order to avoid any unwanted problems. This feature will prompt the user with an error message if they attempt to add a record that violates this property. Not enforcing this property does not automatically mean that the database violates this rule; just that there is no mechanism in place to ensure it is not violated. Referential Data Integrity can be enforced from the Relationships window, either when initially setting up a foreign key relationship or by modifying the relationship line. The steps are as follows: Open the Relationships window using the Relationships button on the Database Tools tab. If necessary, add the tables and create the relationships. If adding new relationships the Edit Relationships window will automatically open. If editing existing relationships either double click on the relationship line (this can be tricky) or right-click and select Edit Relationships as seen in Figure 19. Click on the check box for Enforce Referential Data Integrity. Click Create to save the changes. Figure 19 Enforcing Referential Data Integrity is specific to a relationship. Enforcing this property for the relationship between Officers and Members does not automatically enforce it for the relationship between Finances and Members. Each one must be set independently. Once Referential Data Integrity is enforced there will be two other options that can be selected: Cascade Update Related Fields and Cascade Delete Related Records. Cascade Update Related Fields allows for automatic updating of related database table records if the primary key field value were to change for a specific record. In other words if member #002 is assigned a new number, say #0200, and this property is enforced for the Members–Officers relationship, all Officer records for member #002 will be updated to #0200. Similarly, Cascade Page 20 Delete Related Records would delete related records if the corresponding record were deleted on the primary table. So if member #020 is deleted from the Members table and this property is enforced for the Members-Officers relationship, all Officer records for member #020 will be deleted. Based on the data shown in the Officers table in Figure 16, do all of the ID# numbers appearing on the Officers table also appear on the Members table? No, the Officers table contains an entry for Member ID# 009 while no member 009 appears on the Members table. Hence, Referential Data Integrity has definitely not been enforced for this relationship. Similarly, consider the relationship between the Members table and the Finances table. Here all member ID# numbers contained on the Finances tables also appear on the related table; Referential Data Integrity has not been violated. To know if Referential Data Integrity is enforced, one would need to check the relationship properties in the Relationships window. Page 21