UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON MANA 5338-001Careers and Managing in a Changing Environment Spring 2013 Instructor: George S. Benson, Ph. D. Phone: 817-272-3856 benson@uta.edu http://management.uta.edu/Benson/default.htm Course materials available on Blackboard https://elearn.uta.edu/webapps/login/ Office: COBA 213 Thursday 3:00 – 5:00 pm and by appointment Location: Thursday 7:00 – 9:40 pm COBA 241 COURSE DESCRIPTION This course focuses on practical and theoretical perspectives on careers and managing in a changing work environment. Includes multiple self-assessments, career plan development, informational interviews, readings and exercises designed to lead to a better understanding of managing self and others. We will discuss the trends shaping the future of work and careers, assess your readiness to thrive in the career of your choice, and prepare you to lead change in organizations. COURSE OBJECTIVES You should expect to be provided with a broad and comprehensive exposure to current thinking and research related to careers and managing change. The objectives of this course are to: Increase your level of self-awareness by gaining a broader understanding of your decision-style preferences, interpersonal attributes, skill strengths, interests, and management styles Review the research on individual careers and understand models of career choice, career goals, and career paths that can help you develop your career. Master career skills in managing career transitions, developing trust, networking and persuasion. Develop an appreciation for positive psychology and how it can help you pursue a career in which you can thrive and develop. Understand perspectives on organizational change and develop skills for managing change in organizations. 1 REQUIRED TEXT 1. Self-assessment package available at the UTA Bookstore. The self-assessment instruments we will use are as follows: 1) Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Test (MBTI), 2) Strong Campbell Interest and Skill Survey 3) Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Resolution Inventory (TKI). 2. Rath, T. (2009). Strengths Finder 2.0, New York: The Free Press. Please note you must buy a new copy of the book. 3. Bradberry, T. & Greaves, J. (2009). Emotional Intelligence 2.0, San Diego, CA: Talent Smart. Please note you must buy a new copy of the book. 4. A set of readings are available for purchase through Harvard Business School Publishing. These readings are noted on the syllabus as (HBS). To obtain the HBS readings and cases, you will need to purchase the cases from Harvard’s website. Course Link: https://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cbmp/access/17470465 General Link: http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu GRADING A grade of A (90%), B (80%), C (70%), D (60%), or F (<60%) will be earned based on: Midterm Exam Assessments and Reflective Papers Self-Assessment Paper Individual Change Analysis Paper Attendance and Participation Total 25% 40% 15% 10% 10% 100% It is critical that you regularly attend class and participate in a positive and constructive manner. The class is conducted in a seminar format with numerous in class exercises. Students may be assigned various topics and will be responsible for leading the discussion during particular classes. The instructor's evaluation of your class room participation will account for 10% of your final grade. On-time attendance is important in this class, and missing classes will impact your final grade. MIDTERM EXAM Exam will take place during normal class times. Bring a #2 pencil and a bluebook depending on test format. Tests will consist of multiple choice, true/false, and short answer and essay questions about the material covered in the course including all assigned readings, videos, and in class exercises. ASSESSMENTS AND REFLECTIVE PAPERS There are seven assignments due during the semester and six will be graded. These will count for 30% of your overall grade. These assignments should be typed and brought to class for discussion. Late assignments will not be accepted. 2 In addition to the assignments based on the self-assessments or class readings you will write a “Reflected Best Self-Portrait” based in the process described in: Roberts, L. M., Spreitzer, G., Dutton, J.E., Quinn, R., Heaphy, E., & Barker, B. (2005). How to play to your strengths. Harvard Business Review, 83 (1), 74‐80. The “Reflected Best Self Portrait” requires you to seek feedback from 5-15 people that know you and examine the feedback for themes and commonalities. You need to identify 4-6 common themes in the feedback and reflect on what these say about you when you are at your best. After you gather feedback organize your findings using the three column format on p. 78 (Themes, Examples, and Possible Interpretation). You need a minimum of 3 examples for each theme identified so feedback from as many people as possible helps. You will need approximately 2-3 pages of three column summary. Use this summary to write a self-portrait of your best strengths. Every theme you identify should be included in a self-portrait of 2-3 pages double-spaced. The Reflected Best Self-Portrait counts for 10% of your grade. SELF-ASSESSMENT PAPER A self-assessment paper will be due at the end of the semester and will integrate the material from the class and apply it to your own career. In addition to the “Reflected Best Self” this paper should apply the findings of the various self-assessments conducted throughout the semester to your career aspirations and strategies for meeting your goals. Consider different theories about values, preferred job characteristics, career anchors, and relational styles. Finally, reflect upon the different models that describe how individuals construct their careers. What have you learned this semester that will help you towards a career that maximizes your potential and your happiness? This paper will be 10-15 pages double-spaced long and include your Reflected Best-Self Portrait and findings from the self-assessments completed over the course of the semester. ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION Attendance in class is expected. Because this is an interactive class, outside work is important. All required readings should be completed and prepared for discussion before class. Class participation and completion of assignments is essential in order to gain maximum benefit from the course and will count as 10% of your final grade. Your participation is evaluated on your attendance, preparation for class, and the quality of contributions you make to discussions and exercises in the classroom. DROP POLICY Students may drop or swap (adding and dropping a class concurrently) classes through self-service in MyMav from the beginning of the registration period through the late registration period. After the late registration period, students must see their academic advisor to drop a class or withdraw. Undeclared students must see an advisor in the University Advising Center. Drops can continue through a point twothirds of the way through the term or session. It is the student's responsibility to officially withdraw if they do not plan to attend after registering. Students will not be automatically dropped for nonattendance. Repayment of certain types of financial aid administered through the University may be required as the result of dropping classes or withdrawing. For more information, contact the Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships (http://wweb.uta.edu/ses/fao). 3 STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES UT Arlington provides a variety of resources and programs designed to help students develop academic skills, deal with personal situations, and better understand concepts and information related to their courses. Resources include tutoring, major-based learning centers, developmental education, advising and mentoring, personal counseling, and federally funded programs. For individualized referrals, students may visit the reception desk at University College (Ransom Hall), call the Maverick Resource Hotline at 817-272-6107, send a message to resources@uta.edu, or view the information at www.uta.edu/resources STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES If you are a student who requires accommodations in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), please consult with me at the beginning of the semester. As a faculty member, I am required by law to provide “reasonable accommodation” to students with disabilities, so as not to discriminate on the basis of that disability. Your responsibility is to inform me of the disability at the beginning of the semester and provide me with documentation authorizing the specific accommodation. Student services at UTA include the Office for Students with Disabilities (located in the lower level of the University Center or 272-3364) which is responsible for verifying and implementing accommodations to ensure equal opportunity in all programs and activities. The University of Texas at Arlington is on record as being committed to both the spirit and letter of all federal equal opportunity legislation, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). All instructors at UT Arlington are required by law to provide "reasonable accommodations" to students with disabilities, so as not to discriminate on the basis of that disability. Any student requiring an accommodation for this course must provide the instructor with official documentation in the form of a letter certified by the staff in the Office for Students with Disabilities, University Hall 102. Only those students who have officially documented a need for an accommodation will have their request honored. Information regarding diagnostic criteria and policies for obtaining disability-based academic accommodations can be found at www.uta.edu/disability or by calling the Office for Students with Disabilities at (817) 272-3364. ACADEMIC HONESTY Academic dishonesty is a completely unacceptable mode of conduct and will not be tolerated in any form at The University of Texas at Arlington. All persons involved in academic dishonesty will be disciplined in accordance with University regulations and procedures. Discipline may include suspension or expulsion from the University. “Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, collusion, the submission for credit of any work or materials that are attributable in whole or in part to another person, taking an examination for another person, any act designed to give unfair advantage to a student or the attempt to commit such acts.” (Regents’ Rules and Regulations, Part One, Chapter VI, Section 3, Subsection 3.2., Subdivision 3.22). EVACTUATION PROCEDURES In the event of an evacuation of the College of Business building, when the fire alarm sounds, everyone must leave the building by the stairs. With the fire alarm system we now have, the elevators will all go to the first floor and stay there until the system is turned off. All those in the North tower side of the building should proceed to the fire escape stairs located on the East and West sides of that wing. Disabled persons please go to the Northeast fire stairs. We have an evacu track chair located on the 6th floor stairwell. We have people trained in the use of this chair and there will be someone that will go to the 6th floor to get the chair and bring it to any lower floor stairwell to assist disabled persons. Should this be a real emergency, the Arlington Fire Department and UTA Police will also be here to help. 4 ABOUT THE INSTRUCTOR George S. Benson is an Associate Professor at the University of Texas at Arlington. Dr. Benson earned his Ph.D. from the University of Southern California and completed a Post-Doctoral Fellowship at the Center for Effective Organizations in the Marshall School of Business. Dr. Benson’s research focuses on HR measurement, employee involvement, and strategic management of human capital. He co-authored with Ed Lawler and Sue Mohrman Organizing for High Performance (Jossey-Bass, 2001). Dr. Benson’s writing has appeared in Journal of Applied Psychology, Academy of Management Journal, Human Resource Management, Organizational Dynamics, Sloan Management Review, and Training & Development among others. Dr. Benson’s work with companies has included HR metrics, job design, compensation, employee engagement and retention programs, employee attitude surveys, and training design and evaluation. He has worked with a wide range of organizations including Alcon Laboratories, ADESA Corporation, Aetna, FedEx, Frito-Lay, HKS Architects, KFC-Yum Brands, Pratt & Whitney, and PriceWaterhouse Coopers. Dr. Benson previously worked as a researcher at the American Society for Training and Development in Alexandria, Virginia. He also holds degrees from Washington and Lee University and Georgetown University. 5 COURSE ASSIGNMENTS Week 1 January 17 Introduction to the course Week 2 January 24 The Changing Environment Assigned Reading: Blackboard Ofek, Elie, and Wathieu. 2010. Are You Ignoring Trends That Could Shake Up Your Business? Harvard Business Review, July – August 2010. Meister and Willyerd. 2010. Ten Trends Shaping the Future Workplace Now in The 2020 Workplace, New York, NY: HarperCollins. Davenport and Patil. 2012. Data Scientist: The Sexiest Job of the 21st Century, Harvard Business Review, October 2012, p. 72-76. Due 1. 2. 3. What are the major trends impacting your current or desired industry and profession? How will you current job be different 10-20 years from now? How is your industry or profession different from it was 10-20 years ago. Make a prediction, any prediction, not in the readings for how work will be different in the future. Supplemental Reading: Blackboard Keonig.. 2011. Assessing 21st Century Skills, National Research Council, Washington DC. Bollier. 2011. The Future of Work, What it Means for Individuals, Markets and Governments. The Aspen Institute, Washington DC. Week 3 January 31 Career Models Assigned Reading: Blackboard Kamenetz, 2012. Career of the Future. Fast Company, Jan. 9, 2012. Peters, 1997. The Brand Called You. Fast Company, Aug. 31, 1997. Arthur, M., Rousseau, D., 1996. Career Lexicon for the 21st Century, The Academy of Management Executive v10n4 p. 28. Greenhaus, J., Callanan, G., and Godshalk, V., 2010. Career Contexts and Stages. In Career Management, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Career Models Cont’d next page 6 Career Models Cont’d Due Complete the Strong Interest Inventory (to be mailed in for scoring). Supplemental Reading: Blackboard Arthur, M., Claman, P., and DeFillippi, R., 1995. Intelligent enterprise, intelligent careers, Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), p. 7-19. Ibarra, H. 2002. How to Stay Stuck In the Wrong Career Harvard Business Review December, p. 40-47. Week 4 February 7 Career Success No Assigned Readings Due 1. 2. Complete “Career Anchors” Self-Assessment Reflect on your “Career Anchors” score. Do they fit with your perceptions of yourself? Why or why not? What do they suggest about the type of job or career that you would be best suited for? Supplemental Reading: Blackboard Hallock, K., 2012. The Facts: Who Makes What and What are Their Characteristics?, in Pay: Why People Earn What They Earn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Week 5 February 14 Play to Your Strengths Assigned Reading Rath, T. (2009). Strengths Finder 2.0, New York: The Free Press. . Due 1. 2. Complete the Stengths Finder assessment online, print the scores and bring them to class. Reflect on your Strong Interest Inventory and Strengths Finder scores. Do they fit with your perceptions of yourself? Why or why not? What do they suggest about the type of job or career that you would be best suited for? Supplemental Reading: Blackboard Hall, D. 2002. Career Choice and Decision-Making, in Careers In and Out of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Boyatzis, R. 2008. Competencies in the 21st Century. Journal of Management Development pp 5-12. 7 Week 6 February 21 Relational Styles Assigned Reading: Blackboard NOTE: Please complete the assessments before reading these articles. Goleman, D. (1998). What Makes a Leader? Harvard Business Review, (November‐December): 93‐102. Kennedy, R., and Kennedy, A. 2004, Using the Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator in Career Counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling, 41, pp. 38-43. Due 1. 2. 3. Complete the MTBI and self-score Complete the EQ 2.0 online, print out and bring the scores to class. Reflect on your MTBI and EQ scores. Do they fit with your perceptions of yourself? Why or why not? What do they suggest about the type of job or career that you would be best suited for? Supplemental Reading: Blackboard Zeidner, M. et al. 2004. Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace: A Critical Review. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(3), 371-399. Week 7 February 28 Mid-Term Exam Week 8 March 7 Thriving at Work Assigned Reading: Blackboard Csikszentmiahalyi, M. 1999. If we are so rich, Why aren’t we happy? American Psychologist, 54(10), 821-827. Spreitzer, G., and Portath, C. (2012). Creating Sustainable Performance. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 93-99 Barbara. L. Fredrickson, “The Value of Positive Emotions.” American Scientist, July-August 2003. Rob Cross, Wayne Baker, and Andrew Parker, “What creates energy in organizations?” Sloan Management Review, Summer 2003, pages 5156. Thriving at Work Cont’d next page 8 Thriving at Work Cont’d Supplemental Reading: Blackboard Heaphy, E. and J. Dutton, 2008. “Positive Social Interactions and the Human Body at Work: Linking Organizations and Physiology”. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, 137-162. Henig, R. 2008. Taking play seriously. New York Times Magazine, Feb 17, 2008. Week 9 March 14 Spring Break Week 10 March 21 Career Skills Assigned Reading: Blackboard Cialdini,R. 2001. Harnessing the Power of Persuasion, Harvard Business Review, 79(9), p.72-79. Ibarra, H. and Hunter, M. 2007. “How Leaders Create and Use Networks,” Harvard Business Review, January, 40-47. Assigned Reading: Harvard Publishing Watkins. M. 2009. The Leading-Former-Peers Challenge: A Guide to Navigating this Important Career Transition. In Your Next Move: The Leader’s Guide to Navigating Major Career Transitions. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Hill, L. and Lineback, K. 2010. Can People Trust You? Influence Begins with Trust. In Being the Boss: The 3 Imperatives for Becoming a Great Leader. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. Due Week 11 March 28 Think of two people, one you trust, and one you don’t trust. 1. List the reasons that have led you to trust or distrust each person (no names please). 2. How do you let someone else know that you trust/distrust them? (i.e. what behaviors show trust or distrust)? 3. What, if anything, could the person you distrust do to earn your trust? Business Week – Guest Speaker 9 Week 12 April 4 Developmental Networks Assigned Reading: Blackboard Hewlett, S., Marshall, M., and Sherbin, L. 2011. The Relationship to Get Right. Harvard Business Review, p. 131-134. Meister, J., and Willyerd, K. 2010. Mentoring Millennials, Harvard Business Review, May, p. 68-72. Assigned Reading: Harvard Publishing Developing Professionals: The BCG Way (A) Due 1. What should Josh, Eric, Michael, and Madeleine have done differently in their first 18 months at BCG? What should their mentors have done differently? 2. Evaluate BCG’s career development and mentorship processes. What are their strengths and weaknesses? 3. What can you do to make mentorship more effective with either (1) your mentors or (2) your mentees? Week 13 April 11 Work-Life and Career Resilience Assigned Reading: Blackboard Williams, J. Blair-Loy, M., and Berdahl, J. 2013. The Flexibility Stigma. Rotman Magazine, Winter 2013, pp. 34-39. Morris, B. 1997. Is Your Family Wrecking Your Career? (And vice versa). Fortune, May 17, 1997. Gray, K. 2005. “Quarterlife Crisis Hits Many in Late 20s” ABCnews.go.com. Due Your reflected best self-portrait. Supplemental Reading: Blackboard Boyatzis, R., McKee, A., and Goleman D. 2002. Reawakening Your Passion for Work, Harvard Business Review. April 2002, pp. Linkow, P., and Civian, J. 2011. Men and Work-Life Integration: A Global Study, World at Work. 10 Week 14 April 18 Gender and Generation Assigned Readings: Blackboard Howe, N. and Williams, S., 2007. The Next 20 Years. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 2007, p. 41-52. Hewlett, S., Sherbin, L., and Sumberg, K. 2009. How Gen Y and Boomers will Reshape Your Agenda. Harvard Business Review, JulyAugust, 2009, p. 71-76. Fels, A. 2004. Do Women Lack Ambition? Harvard Business Review, April 2004, p. 50-60. Assigned Reading: Harvard Publishing Pfeffer, J., 2012, Women’s Careers and Power: What You Need to Know. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Business School Publishing Supplemental Reading: Blackboard Tannen, D. 1995. The Power of Talk. Harvard Business Review, September –October 1995, p. 139-148. The Reflexive Generation: Young Professionals Perspectives on Work, Career, and Gender. 2009. London Business School. Week 15 April 25 Leading Organizational Change Assigned Readings: Blackboard Kotter, J. 1995. Leading Change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review.(reprint January 2007 pp. 96-103). D.E. Meyerson, 2001. “Radical Change the Quiet Way,” Harvard Business Review. October. Levesque, L., and Roberto, M. 2005. The art of making change initiatives stick. MIT Sloan Management Review 46.4. Due: 1. 2. Complete the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Resolution Inventory (TKI) and self-score. Reflect on your TKI assessment. Does it fit with your perceptions of yourself? Why or why not? Leading Organizational Change Cont’d Next Page 11 Leading Organizational Change Cont’d Supplemental Reading: Blackboard Hamel, G. 2000. Waking up IBM: How a gang of unlikely rebels transformed big blue. Harvard Business Review, July-August 2000, p. 137-146. Week 16 May 2 Change Management Simulation: Power and Influence Due Self-assessment paper Week 17 May 9 Due Individual change analysis paper: Write a three to four double-spaced page analysis of organizational change from the Change Management Simulation. First, present a description of your experience with the change simulation. How might your approach have been shaped by your own Conflict Resolution Styles? Second, briefly assess the effectiveness of your overall change approach. What worked and what did not work? Why? What would you do differently if you were able to start over from the beginning? Finally, discuss how your team dynamics either helped or hindered your performance on the simulation. What are the implications for how you work most effectively with teams in the future? 12