ppt - Chair of Computational Biology

advertisement

Intro: Transcriptional regulatory networks

RegulonDB: database with information on transcriptional regulation and operon organization in E.coli; 105 regulators affecting 749 genes

7 regulatory proteins (CRP, FNR, IHF, FIS, ArcA, NarL and Lrp) are sufficient to directly modulate the expression of more than half of all E.coli genes.

Out-going connectivity follows a power-law distribution

In-coming connectivity follows exponential distribution (Shen-Orr).

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Martinez-Antonio, Collado-Vides, Curr Opin Microbiol 6, 482 (2003)

Bioinformatics III 1

Intro: frequency of co-regulation

Regulation by multiple TFs occurs in half of genes.

In most cases, a „gobal“ regulator (with > 10 interactions) works together with a more specific local regulator.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Martinez-Antonio, Collado-Vides, Curr Opin Microbiol 6, 482 (2003)

Bioinformatics III 2

Intro: regulation of TFs and club co-regulation

However, in a process of decisions and information flux, the number of controlled or affected elements is not the only factor to be considered.

A hierarchy of different levels of decision is natural to our understanding of how things get done.

In general, global regulators work together with other global regulators.

Dynamics of decison-making is a cooperative process of different subsets of the network put into action at certain moments.

Martinez-Antonio, Collado-Vides, Curr Opin Microbiol 6, 482 (2003)

4. Lecture WS 2004/05 Bioinformatics III 3

Intro: response to changes in environmental conditions

The second function of TFs is to sense changes in environmental conditions or other internal signals encoding changes.

Global environment growth conditions in which TFs are regulating.

# in brackets indicates how many additional TFs participate in the same number of conditions.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Martinez-Antonio, Collado-Vides, Curr Opin Microbiol 6, 482 (2003)

Bioinformatics III 4

Do we need to rely on experiments?

Determine homology between the domains and protein families of TFs and regulated genes and proteins of known 3D structure.

Determine uncharacterized E.coli proteins with

DNA-binding domains, thus identify large majority of E.coli TFs.

Sarah Teichmann

MRC LMB Cambridge

Finding: 75% of all TFs are two-domain proteins.

Analysis of domain architecture shows that 75% of the TFs have arisen by gene duplication.

Madan Babu,

PhD student at LMB

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Babu, Teichmann, Nucl. Acid Res. 31, 1234 (2003)

Bioinformatics III 5

Flow chart of method to identify TFs in E.coli

SUPERFAMILY database (C. Chothia) contains a library of HMM models based on the sequences of proteins in SCOP for predicted proteins of completely sequenced genomes.

In addition to our set of 271 transcription factors, there are eight transcription factors without a DBD assignment that have known regulatory information.

Remove all DNA-binding proteins involved in replication/repair etc.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Babu, Teichmann, Nucl. Acid Res. 31, 1234 (2003)

Bioinformatics III 6

3D structures of putative (and real) TFs in E.coli

The three-dimensional structures of the 11 DBD families seen in the 271 identified transcription factors in E.coli

. The figure highlights the fact that even though the helix –turn–helix motif occurs in all families except the nucleic acid binding family, the scaffolds in which the motif occurs are very different.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Babu, Teichmann, Nucl. Acid Res. 31, 1234 (2003)

Bioinformatics III 7

Domain architectures of TFs

The 74 unique domain architectures of the 271 identified TFs. Each functional class is represented by a different shape and each family within the functional class is represented by a different colour.

The DBDs are represented as rectangles. The partner domains are represented as hexagons (small molecule-binding domain), triangles (enzyme domains), circles (protein interaction domain), diamonds (domains of unknown function) and the receiver domain has a pentagonal shape.

The letters A, R, D and U denote activators, repressors, dual regulators and TFs of unknown function, and the number of TFs of each type is given next to each domain architecture.

Architectures of known 3D structure are denoted by asterisks, and ‘+’ are cases where the regulatory function of a TF has been inferred by indirect methods, so that the DNA-binding site is not known.

Babu, Teichmann, Nucl. Acid Res. 31, 1234 (2003)

4. Lecture WS 2004/05 Bioinformatics III 8

Evolution of TFs

10% 1-domain proteins

75% 2-domain proteins

12% 3-domain proteins

3% 4-domain proteins

TFs have evolved by extensive recombination of domains.

Proteins with the same sequential arrangement of domains are likely to be direct duplicates of each other.

74 distinct domain architectures have duplicated to give rise to 271 TFs.

Babu, Teichmann, Nucl. Acid Res. 31, 1234 (2003)

4. Lecture WS 2004/05 Bioinformatics III 9

Organisation of transcriptional regulatory network

For 121 TFs, there is information on their regulated genes.

They can be divided into 10 general functional categories.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Babu, Teichmann, Nucl. Acid Res. 31, 1234 (2003)

Bioinformatics III 10

Regulatory cascades

The TF regulatory network in E.coli

.

When more than one TF regulates a gene, the order of their binding sites is as given in the figure. An arrowhead is used to indicate positive regulation when the position of the binding site is known.

Horizontal bars indicates negative regulation when the position of the binding site is known. In cases where only the nature of regulation is known, without binding site information, + and

– are used to indicate positive and negative regulation.

The DBD families are indicated by circles of different colours as given in the key. The names of global regulators are in bold.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Babu, Teichmann, Nucl. Acid Res. 31, 1234 (2003)

Bioinformatics III 11

Design principles of regulatory networks

Wiring diagrams of regulatory networks resemble somehow electrical circuits.

Try to break down networks into basic building blocks.

Search for „network motifs“ as patterns of interconnections that recur in many different parts of a network at frequencies much higher than those found in randomized networks.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Uri Alon

Weizman Institute

Shen-Orr et al. Nature Gen. 31, 64 (2002)

Bioinformatics III 12

Detection of motifs

Represent transcriptional network as a connectivity matrix M such that M ij

= 1 if operon j encodes a TF that transcriptionally regulates operon i and M ij

= 0 otherwise.

Scan all n × n submatrices of M generated by choosing n nodes that lie in a connected graph, for n = 3 and n = 4.

Submatrices were enumerated efficiently by recursively searching for nonzero elements.

Compute a P value for submatrices representing each type of connected subgraph by comparing # of times they appear in real network vs. in random network.

For n = 3, the only significant motif is the feedforward loop.

For n = 4, only the overlapping regulation motif is significant.

SIMs and multi-input modules were identified by searching for identical rows of M .

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Shen-Orr et al. Nature Gen. 31, 64 (2002)

Bioinformatics III 13

DOR detection

Consider all operons regulated by

≥ 2 TFs.

Define (nonmetric) distance measure between operons k and j , based on the # of

TFs regulating both operons: d( k,j ) = 1/ (1+

 n f n

M k,n

M j,n

) 2 )

Where f n

= 0.5 for global TFs and f n

= 1 otherwise.

Cluster operons with average-linkage algorithm.

DORs correspond to clusters with more than 10 connections with a ratio of connections to TFs > 2.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Shen-Orr et al. Nature Gen. 31, 64 (2002)

Bioinformatics III 14

Network motifs found in E.coli transcript-regul network

a , Feedforward loop : a TF X regulates a second TF

Y , and both jointly regulate one or more operons

Z

1

...Z

n

.

b , Example of a feedforward loop (L-arabinose utilization).

c , SIM motif : a single TF, X , regulates a set of operons Z

1

...Z

n

. X is usually autoregulatory. All regulations are of the same sign. No other transcription factor regulates the operons. d , Example of a SIM system (arginine biosynthesis).

e , DOR motif : a set of operons Z

1

...

Z m are each regulated by a combination of a set of input transcription factors, X

1

...X

n

. DOR-algorithm detects dense regions of connections, with a high ratio of connections to transcription factors. f , Example of a DOR (stationary phase response).

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Shen-Orr et al. Nature Gen. 31, 64 (2002)

Bioinformatics III 15

Significance of motifs

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Shen-Orr et al. Nature Gen. 31, 64 (2002)

Bioinformatics III 16

Regulatory network

Each TF appears only in a single subgraph except for global TFs that can appear in several subgraphs.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Shen-Orr et al. Nature Gen. 31, 64 (2002)

Bioinformatics III 17

Regulatory networks

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Shen-Orr et al. Nature Gen. 31, 64 (2002)

Bioinformatics III 18

Structural organization of transcript-regul networks

Modules: observation that reg. Networks are highly interconnected, very few modules can be entirely separated from the rest of the network.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Babu et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 14, 283 (2004)

Bioinformatics III 19

Evolution of the gene regulatory network

Larger genomes tend to have more TFs per gene.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Babu et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 14, 283 (2004)

Bioinformatics III 20

Cross-organism comparison

Many TF families are specific to individual phylogenetic groups or greatly expanded in some genomes.

In contrast to the high level of conservation of other regulatory and signalling systems across the crown group eukaryotes, some of the TF families are dramatically different in the various lineages.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Babu et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 14, 283 (2004)

Bioinformatics III 21

Regulatory interactions across organisms

Are regulatory interactions conserved among organisms? Apparently yes.

Orthologous TFs regulate orthologous target genes.

As expected, the conservation of genes and interaction is related to the phylogenetic difference between organisms.

Above: Many interactions of (a) can be mapped to pathogenetic Pseudomonas aeruginosa that is related to E.coli (b).

Very few interactions can be mapped from (a) to (c).

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Babu et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 14, 283 (2004)

Bioinformatics III 22

Regulatory interactions across organisms

Observation: there is no bias towards conservation of network motifs.

Regulatory interactions in motifs are lost or retained at the same rate as the other interactions in the network.

The transcriptional network appears to evolve in a step-wise manner , with loss and gain of individual interactions probably playing a greater role than loss and gain of whole motifs or modules.

Observation: TFs are less conserved than target genes, which suggests that regulation of genes evolves faster than the genes themselves.

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Babu et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 14, 283 (2004)

Bioinformatics III 23

Something spectacular at the end

Integrate transcriptional regulatory information and gene-expression data for multiple conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisae.

5 conditions cell cycle sporulation diauxic shift

DNA damage stress response

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Luscombe, Babu, … Teichmann, Gerstein, Nature 431, 308 (2004)

Bioinformatics III 24

SANDY: topological measures + network motifs

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

+ some post-analysis

Bioinformatics III

Luscombe et al. Nature 431, 308 (2004)

25

Dynamic representation of transript. regul. network

a , Schematics and summary of properties for the endogenous and exogenous sub-networks. b , Graphs of the static and condition-specific networks. Transcription factors and target genes are shown as nodes in the upper and lower sections of each graph respectively, and regulatory interactions are drawn as edges; they are coloured by the number of conditions in which they are active. Different conditions use distinct sections of the network. c , Standard statistics (global topological measures and local network motifs) describing network structures. These vary between endogenous and exogenous conditions; those that are high compared with other conditions are shaded. (Note, the graph for the static state displays only sections that are active in at least one condition, but the table provides statistics for the entire network including inactive regions.)

4. Lecture WS 2004/05

Luscombe, Babu, … Teichmann, Gerstein, Nature 431, 308 (2004)

Bioinformatics III 26

Interpretation

Half of the targets are uniquely expressed in only one condition; in contrast, most

TFs are used across multiple processes.

The active sub-networks maintain or rewire regulatory interactions, over half of the active interactions are completely supplanted by new ones between conditions.

Only 66 interactions are retained across ≥ 4 conditions.

They are always „on“ and mostly regulate house-keeping functions.

The calculations divide the 5 condition-specific networks into 2 categories: endogenous and exogenous .

Endogenous processes are multi-stage, operate with an internal transcriptional program

Exogenous processes are binary events that react to external stimuli with a rapid turnover of expressed genes.

Luscombe et al. Nature 431, 308 (2004)

4. Lecture WS 2004/05 Bioinformatics III 27

Luscombe et al. Nature 431, 308 (2004)

4. Lecture WS 2004/05 Bioinformatics III

Figure 2 Newly derived 'follow-on' statistics for network structures. a , TF hub usage in different cellular conditions.

The cluster diagram shades cells by the normalized number of genes targeted by TF hubs in each condition. One cluster represents permanent hubs and the others conditionspecific transient hubs. Genes are labelled with four-letter names when they have an obvious functional role in the condition, and seven-letter open reading frame names when there is no obvious role. Of the latter, gene names are red and italicised when functions are poorly characterized. Starred hubs show extreme interchange index values, I = 1. b , Interaction interchange ( I ) of TF between conditions. A histogram of I for all active TFs shows a uni-modal distribution with two extremes. Pie charts show five example TFs with different proportions of interchanged interactions. We list the main functions of the distinct target genes regulated by each example transcription factor. Note how the TFs' regulatory functions change between conditions. c , Overlap in TF usage between conditions.

Venn diagrams show the numbers of individual

TFs (large intersection) and pair-wise TF combinations (small intersection) that overlap between the two endogenous conditions.

28

Interpretation

Most hubs (78%) are transient = they are influential in one condition, but less so in others.

Exogenous conditions have fewer transient hubs (different

).

„Transient hub“: capacity to change interactions between connections.

Luscombe et al. Nature 431, 308 (2004)

4. Lecture WS 2004/05 Bioinformatics III 29

TF inter-regulation during the cell cycle time-course

a , The 70 TFs active in the cell cycle. The diagram shades each cell by the normalized number of genes targeted by each TF in a phase. Five clusters represent phase-specific

TFs and one cluster is for ubiquitously active

TFs. Both hub and non-hub TFs are included.

Luscombe et al. Nature 431, 308 (2004)

4. Lecture WS 2004/05 b , Serial inter-regulation between phasespecific TFs. Network diagrams show TFs that are active in one phase regulate TFs in subsequent phases. In the late phases, TFs apparently regulate those in the next cycle. c , Parallel inter-regulation between phasespecific and ubiquitous TFs in a two-tiered hierarchy. Serial and parallel inter-regulation operate in tandem to drive the cell cycle while balancing it with basic house-keeping processes.

Bioinformatics III 30

Summary

Integrated analysis of transcriptional regulatory information and condition-specific gene-expression data; post-analysis, e.g.

- Identification of permanent and transient hubs

- interchange index

- overlap in TF usage across multiple conditions.

Large changes in underlying network architecture

 in response to diverse stimuli, TFs alter their interactions to varying degrees, thereby rewiring the network

 some TFs serve as permanent hubs, most act transiently

 environmental responses facilitate fast signal propagation

 cell cycle and sporulation proceed via multiple stages

Many of these concepts may also apply to other biological networks.

Luscombe et al. Nature 431, 308 (2004)

4. Lecture WS 2004/05 Bioinformatics III 31

Download