Chapter 12 School Reform This Multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: Any public performance or display, including transmission of any image over a network; Preparation of any derivative work, including the extraction, in whole or in part, of any images; Any rental, lease, or lending of the program. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 1 “… THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF OUR SOCIETY ARE PRESENTLY BEING ERODED BY A RISING TIDE OF MEDIOCRITY THAT THREATENS OUR VERY FUTURE AS A NATION AND A PEOPLE. WHAT WAS UNIMAGINABLE A GENERATION AGO HAS BEGUN TO HAPPEN – OTHERS ARE MATCHING AND SURPASSING OUR EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENTS. IF AN UNFRIENDLY POWER HAD ATTEMPTED TO IMPOSE ON AMERICA THE MEDIOCRE EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE THAT EXISTS TODAY, WE MIGHT WELL HAVE VIEWED IT AS AN ACT OF WAR. AS IT STANDS, WE HAVE ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN TO OURSELVES.” 1. DO YOU RECOGNIZE THIS STATEMENT? 2. WHERE IS IT FROM? National Commission on Excellence in Education. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. (1983) 3. HOW DO YOU REACT TO THE ABOVE STATEMENT? Do You Believe That Schools Should be Restructured? How? What Should They Be Like? Restructuring Influences Political Economic American youth are unprepared for the technical demands of the workplace Cognitive Research American youth lag behind other countries How the brain works Multiple Intelligence & Learning Styles Constructivist Learning Theory & Research How students actively produce knowledge & understanding The science of teaching Restructuring Influences Philosophy & Sociology Research in Academic Disciplines NCTM & AAAS Curriculum Theory & Research Knowledge is a social, political, cultural construct Knowledge is tentative - open to change Identifies and attempts to remove cultural, gender and class bias from the curriculum Pluralism & Inclusion Multiculturalism, Bilingual, Special Education Restructuring Influences Research on Assessment Performance Research on Professional Practice Teachers and Authentic are pretty smart and should be utilized Research on Second-Order Change Systemic Change Cultural Change If you were to design a school to have all students performing at grade level proficiency: How would it be organized? How would students be instructed (taught)? How will you measure your results? Which 2 would you choose? 1. Knowledge in one discipline 2. Application within discipline 3. Application across disciplines 4. Application to real-world predictable situations 5. Application to real-world unpredictable situations International Center for Leadership in Education Knowledge Taxonomy 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Awareness (Knowledge) Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation Rigor/Relevance Framework 6 Knowledge 5 4 3 2 Application 1 1 2 3 4 5 Levels Bloom’s 6 5 4 3 2 1 C D A B 1 2 3 Application 4 5 Guiding Principles Responsibility Contemplation Initiative Perseverance Optimism Courage Respect Compassion Adaptability Honesty Trustworthiness Loyalty Curriculum Rigor Relevance Relationships • Reflective Thought Levels Bloom’s 6 5 4 3 2 1 C D A B 1 2 3 Application 4 5 Rigor/Relevance - All Why Do We Need to Change Schools? What How Needs to Do We Do Be Done? It? International Center for Leadership in Education, Inc. and Successful Practices Network Phone (518) 399-2776 E-mail info@LeaderEd.com www.LeaderEd.com School Reform The major theoretical strategies for school reform efforts (See Chapter 7): Empirical-rational strategies. Power-coercive strategies. Organizational self-renewal strategies. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 17 Market-Based School Reform Supported by market-oriented theorists and private sector investors. John Chubb and Terry Moe wrote a popular book, Politics, Markets, and America's Schools, published in 1990 by The Brookings Institution. They argued that market-based schools would foster the autonomy schools need to be effective. To shift control of schools from government to the marketplace, they recommended providing guardians of every student with a voucher they could use in any school, public or private. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 18 Economic Theory and School Reform Milton Friedman, an economist, designed the concept of school vouchers. Friedman’s views that favor public works in free markets to stimulate the economy were in contrast to John Maynard Keynes (Keynesian economics). Keynes advocated public works and government spending in free markets to stimulate employment and the economy. Friedman pioneered the idea of open markets without government interference or control. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 19 Economic Theory and School Reform (continued) The scope of free markets taking control of education would be enormous. The free market theory is based on the belief that individuals will make a rational choice in their own economic self interest. It does not consider motivation, collaboration, conflict management and other human issues in the workplace. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 20 Economic Theory and School Reform (continued) Supporters of market-based approaches include: William Raspberry, Washington Post syndicated columnist. Thomas Sowell, economist and syndicated columnist. Andrew Coulson, author of Market Education: The Unknown History. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 21 School Reform as Investment Opportunity Many individuals and businesses have invested for profit in educational initiatives: Michael Milken—former junk bond king. Paul Allen—founder of Microsoft with Bill Gates. William Bennett—former Secretary of Education. Advantage Schools. Beacon Educational Management. Edison Schools—one of the largest. Started by Christopher Whittle, who started Channel One. Benno Schmidt—CEO of Edison and former President of Yale. Education Alternatives Incorporated (EAI). University of Phoenix—Largest private university. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 22 Standards-Based School Reform Since the right to an education was not established by the US Constitution, the states guaranteed public education in their state Constitutions. All states initially chose to decentralize public schools putting them in the hands of local authorities. Local Education Agencies (LEAs) had much control of education until the 1990s. The first summit on education in 1989 started the movement toward more centralized control focusing on state standards. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 23 Standards-Based School Reform (continued) Two additional summit meetings continued pushing for state control of education resulting in state “report cards” comparing states on test scores across states, comparing districts within states, and schools within districts. States and districts also began using high-stakes testing for students to qualify for promotion and/or graduating high school. Little attention has been paid to the effects of testing at the school level, students daily lives, curriculum & instruction, or student educational & career planning. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 24 Whole School Reform Whole school reform is predicated on: Top-down methods have not been very successful. Demonstrated success of individual school renewal efforts. Systemic reform efforts, orchestrated by state or local district offices, that have attempted to mandate individual school reform efforts have not worked very well. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 25 Increasing School Autonomy One solution to the problems of systemic reform was site-based management in which individual schools have more authority in decision making. This reform effort has had mixed results due to lack of true decentralization of authority with freedom to use budgets as needed in individual schools. Nonetheless, school reform is recognized as having a better chance of success when the local district offices encourage individual school staff to collaborate in problem solving, i.e., to create growthenhancing environments. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 26 Increasing School Autonomy (continued) This fusion of state and district control of standards and empowerment of individual schools may be the new amalgam that Giamatti had described. This amalgam was suggested in 1999 by the Education Commission of the States report, Governing America's Schools: Changing the Rules, that identified two approaches: Institutionalize site-based management allowing schools to prepare their own budgets and allocate resources as needed. Authorize publicly funded, but independently owned and operated schools under charters granted by the school district. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 27 Increasing School Autonomy (continued) Both approaches call for: Strengthening, not discarding, the public school system. Allowing money to follow the child. Providing information on students, teachers, and school performance to parents. Giving parents more choice. Granting schools control of personnel and budgets. Focusing accountability systems on achievement. Redefining the role of teachers’ unions. Strengthening the role of school boards. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 28 Increasing School Autonomy (continued) These approaches provide greater opportunity for school leaders to be more effective in making a difference, while increasing their responsibility for results. To be effective, school leaders need to reach out, connect with people and use collaborative methods in selecting problem-solving strategies for schools. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 29 Increasing School Autonomy (continued) Three examples of whole school reforms that have shown positive results: Coalition of Essential Schools—Ted Sizer. Accelerated Schools—Stanford University. Comer School Development Program—James Comer. Additional whole school reform projects described at: http://www.aasa.org/issues_and_insights/district_organizati on/Reform/approach.htm Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 30 Teacher Education and School Reform There has also been increased focus on teacher education to prepare for the looming shortage. John Goodlad’s National Network for Educational Renewal calls for the renewal of schools and teacher education. American Council on Education has called for the strengthening of teacher education and research on teacher education. Goodlad and ACE’s proposals may be more potent in the reform of US education than we suspect. Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 31