Developing Program Workshop Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education Structure of the Workshop PART 1 Describe the pre-accreditation process Early development activities Some discussion of requirements for the AFC Part 2 The Candidacy Visit CAPTE’s approach to on-site reviews What to expect in interactions with reviewers on-site What is good vs. bad evidence Part 3 Discussion of the standards and required elements and the expectations for Candidacy 3/22/2016 Purposes of this Workshop 1. For programs in the very early stages of development: description of current context for PT education 2. Briefly introduce CAPTE 3. Demystify the CAPTE pre-accreditation process (informally referred to as “Candidacy”) 4. Discuss the general expectations for achievement of Candidate for Accreditation Status 5. Provide guidance on how to develop an Application for Candidacy (AFC) 6. Describe some of the reasons for denial and citations 7. Answer questions 3/22/2016 You may think you know about accreditation, but you haven’t met CAPTE yet! 3/22/2016 Important Takeaways This is a rigorous process designed to foster quality from the beginning We’ve given you a roadmap, follow the directions The burden of proof is on the program Doing it right the first time increases the chances of success The Rules change frequently, keep up with them 3/22/2016 DPW Resources Slides: DPW/SSW Part 7 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure Info about Candidacy Visit & Report 2016 Standards and Required Elements for the AFC Conducting and Writing a Needs Assessment 3/22/2016 CURRENT CONTEXT 1. Number of Programs 2. Students 3. Faculty Availability 4. Clinical Site Availability 5. PT/PTA job market 6. Regulatory environment 7. Discussions in the profession re: expansion of types of support personnel 8. Changes in reimbursement 3/22/2016 Number of Accredited Programs 1990-2020 (projected) 3/22/2016 Number of US Programs PT Programs PTA Programs TOTAL Accredited 230 348 580 Developing 29 46 75 259 394 655 As of 2/2/16 TOTAL 3/22/2016 Students PT students 31,426 enrolled Avg class size = 43 62.6% are female 77.5% are White Avg age at admit = 24 PTA Students 13,272 enrolled Avg class size = 23 64.5% are female 73.5% are White Avg age at admit = 27 tend to be place bound F 3/22/2016 Graduates 2004-2019 3/22/2016 Faculty Availability (based on AAR data) PT Programs •Current faculty (2015-16) PTA Programs •Current faculty (2015-16) 2782 full-time 923 full-time 319 part-time 274 part-time Student to Faculty ratio: 11.5 to 1 (core), 13.1 to 1 (lab) Student to Faculty ratio 14.9 to 1 (core), 11.4 to 1 (lab) Open positions in existing candidate & accredited programs Open positions in existing candidate and accredited programs 168 current 33 current 173 projected 34 projected 3/22/2016 Clinical Site Availability Educational experience, not OJT Course, with credit attached CEC is responsible faculty member Issues CI qualifications Productivity expectations # available placements Variety issues Before or after accreditation? 3/22/2016 PT/PTA Job Market BLS data • PT: 73,500 increase 2012-2022 • PTA: 29,300 increase 2012-2022 APTA prediction model Shortage or mal-distribution? Anecdotal evidence of shrinking PTA job market in some areas Development of new programs: PT programs more than doubled by 2017 PTA programs more than tripled by 2017 3/22/2016 Group Activity Defend or reject the following market justification provided by developing programs and previously submitted AFC's: The demand for additional students by clinical sites and the availability of sites for the purposes of clinical education in the area necessitates the need for the college to develop a PT/PTA program in an effort to meet local, regional, and national workforce needs. Discuss the following: What other factors are important considerations when conducting a market survey for the development of any professional or occupational program of study? Which are the most important factors in making a determination about the feasibility of developing and offering a new program at your institution? 3/22/2016 BREAK 3/22/2016 Regulatory Environment USDE expectations related to assuring student achievement CAPTE sets thresholds for student achievement: Graduation rates Licensure pass rates Employment rates “Gainful employment” issues Transparency and accuracy of information 3/22/2016 APTA discussions APTA in midst of discussions regarding the use of supportive personnel, including the PTA. Change role of PTA? Change curricular content of PT? PTA? Change in educational level of PTA? 3/22/2016 Payment Issues Questions being raised regarding the level of payment for services provided by PTAs Medicare/Medicaid do not pay for care provided by students at either level 3/22/2016 New Standards New Standards and Required Elements adopted by CAPTE November 2014 Effective January 1, 2016 All Candidacy decisions beginning with 2015C 3/22/2016 Meet CAPTE Recognized specialized/programmatic accrediting organization Recognized since 1977, but APTA involved in education QA since 1928 31 Commissioners/3 working groups Meets in April & November (& July) Candidacy & Accreditation decisions Central Panel meeting in late July/early August for Candidacy decisions and other business 3/22/2016 Accreditation Voluntary, nongovernmental, process of external peer review used by US higher education to scrutinize colleges, universities, and educational programs for quality assurance and quality improvement. 3/22/2016 CAPTE Accreditation Voluntary You have voluntarily decided to develop a PT/PTA program CAPTE accreditation required for licensure and federal student grants Thereby, requires programs to abide by CAPTE standards and procedures Nongovernmental Process of external peer review For quality assurance and quality improvement 3/22/2016 Standards & Required Elements Minimum, but not minimal, expectations Specific, but not prescriptive, expectations • A few prescriptive criteria do exist Describe what programs need to do, but not how it is to be accomplished 3/22/2016 2016 Standards 1. Mission, goals, and outcomes 2. Assessment & Planning 3. Institution and Program Integrity 4. Faculty 5. Students 6. Curriculum Plan 7. Curriculum Content 8. Resources 3/22/2016 T H E N E W S TA N DA R D S What’s NEW exactly? Expectations for faculty Curriculum Assessment Format for evidence 26 The CAPTE Candidacy Process A process based on evidence • Application for Candidacy • Other documents • Interviews • Observation Purpose Develop a relationship with CAPTE/staff Demonstrate institution’s commitment to development of a quality program Promote good planning for the proposed program Ensure sufficient readiness for implementation of the proposed program Increase the chances for a positive accreditation decision 3/22/2016 Underlying Philosophy The charter class deserves the same level of educational quality as subsequent classes. Qualified faculty Curricular content / delivery Clinical education experiences Overall educational experience Ability to pass the licensure exam And, so do the patients/clients that new graduates will care for. 3/22/2016 Context: Continuum of development Same standards/elements, different expectations Plan program Achieve Candidacy Satisfactory Progress Toward Compliance, Based on expectations specified in AFC Implement program with continued development & submission of annual reports Achieve (initial) Accreditation Compliance Report outcomes / continued compliance 3/22/2016 Candidacy vs Accreditation Satisfactory Progress toward Compliance Varying levels of development related to individual criteria: specified in AFC instructions Compliance Has the program provided evidence that it meets the standards? Have the students received an appropriate education to prepare them for practice? 3/22/2016 Early Activities (1 of 2) Assessment of Feasibility & Need May be different for PT or PTA programs Local, regional data, national data for PT Local, regional for PTA (not just BLS data or a few local clinical providers) Lots of prospective students does NOT equal need for program Implications of regulations re: outcomes Are there physical therapy jobs where grads want to work? FORMAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT IS REQUIRED CAPTE defined process 3/22/2016 Early Activities (2 of 2) Approvals Required (program & degree) Institutional (at highest level required) State Higher Ed Regulatory Agency Board of Higher Education? Institutional licensing/authorizing body? Charter / statute Institutional Accreditor 3/22/2016 Planning for Program Development and Implementation Factors to consider: Timing Which candidacy review cycle to seek When the charter class is planned to begin professional/technical courses When the charter class will be enrolled in the penultimate term of the program When charter class is scheduled to graduate Timing (fixed dates) of licensure examination following graduation. 3/22/2016 Planning for Program Implementation Timing of licensure examinations FSBPT controls administration of the NPTE Four administrations per year (began 2013) PTA Dates: early January, April, July, October PT Dates: late January, April, July, October Students cannot register until CAPTE grants accreditation; must register at least 5 weeks prior to testing date 3/22/2016 Planning for Program Implementation Timing of penultimate term of charter class enrollment… Determines when the on-site visit for initial accreditation will occur: Typically late in the term 3/22/2016 Planning for Program Implementation Timing of graduation of charter class… Determines when CAPTE will make the accreditation decision (April or November) CAPTE decision prior to graduation (or no more than 30 days after) At least 10 weeks between on-site visit and CAPTE decision 3/22/2016 Planning for Program Implementation Timing of matriculation into the program… Candidacy decision needs to be made at least 3 weeks prior to matriculation. Allows time after the decision to address issues that could arise if there is a negative decision. 3/22/2016 Planning for Program Implementation Selection of Candidacy Cycle Determined by planned matriculation of students into the technical/professional phase of the program Planned Enrollment Decision Submission Date Fall Jul/Aug March 1 Spring Nov June 1 Summer April December 1 Submit Developing Program Information Form (DPIF) 7 programs per cycle limit; if a requested cycle is full, the program will be placed on the next available cycle. Ties will be broken by date/time of receipt of DPIF Currently working on 2017A (March 1 AFC submission) 3/22/2016 BREAK 3/22/2016 Candidacy Process: 7 Steps Notification of intent to seek accreditation Notification that a PD has been employed to develop the program. Development of program / AFC •Conflict List •Confirm review cycle Submission of AFC & Staff screen to determine bona fides AFC Review by Candidacy Reviewer / Visit to program / Candidacy Visit Report Respond to visit report CAPTE decision 3/22/2016 Candidacy Process Notification of intent to seek accreditation Notification that a PD has been employed to develop the program. Development of program / AFC •Conflict List •Confirm review cycle Submission of AFC & Staff screen to determine bona fides AFC Review by Candidacy Reviewer / Visit to program / Candidacy Visit Report Respond to visit report CAPTE decision 3/22/2016 Step 1: Notification of Intent Letter of intent to seek accreditation Accompanied by documentation that the institution is approved to offer post-secondary education and is degree granting is accredited by a recognized accreditor and in compliance with all expectations has approval to develop/offer the proposed program from Institution (highest level required) State authorizing agency Institutional accreditor (at least applied for) USDE financial responsibility score > 0 Includes contact info of administrative officials Include contact info for state authorities and institutional accreditor 3/22/2016 Candidacy Process Notification of intent to seek accreditation Notification that a PD has been employed to develop the program. Development of program / AFC •Conflict List •Confirm review cycle Submission of AFC & Staff screen to determine bona fides AFC Review by Candidacy Reviewer / Visit to program / Candidacy Visit Report Respond to visit report CAPTE decision 3/22/2016 Step 2A: Employ a Program Director This step can occur simultaneously with Step 1 PD should be employed at least 6-9 months prior to planned date for submission of AFC Employed means “on board” working at/for the institution on a full-time basis to develop the program PD meets qualifications specified in Standards 3/22/2016 PTA PD Qualifications 4G The program director is a physical therapist or physical therapist assistant who demonstrates an understanding of education and contemporary clinical practice appropriate for leadership in physical therapist assistant education. These qualifications include all of the following: a minimum of a master’s degree; holds a current license/certification to practice as a PT or PTA in any United States jurisdiction; Note: If clinical practice is required for licensure and the individual is not engaged in clinical practice, provide a statement to that effect and provide the reference in the State Practice Act that would preclude licensure; a minimum of five years (or equivalent), full-time, post licensure experience that includes a minimum of three years (or equivalent) of full-time clinical experience; didactic and/or clinical teaching experience; experience in administration/management; experience in educational theory and methodology, instructional design, student evaluation and outcome assessment, including the equivalent of nine academic credits of coursework in educational foundations. NOTE: if the program director does not have nine academic credits of coursework in educational foundations, and the program wishes to seek an exemption, provide a rationale for the equivalency of the program director’s qualifications to meet the intent of this expectation. 3/22/2016 NOTE: Completion of APTA’s Education Leadership Institute constitutes 9 academic credits. Step 2B: Notify Accreditation that PD has been Employed Official Notification (i.e., on institutional letterhead) Include Copy of the PD’s CV that justifies qualifications Copy of PD contract (salary info redacted) Copy of existing policies re: full-time employment Statement, signed by CEO and PD, that PD is indeed employed full-time by the institution in accordance with the existing policies PD Contact information, incl. email and phone # at the institution 3/22/2016 Step 2B: Notify Accreditation that PD has been Employed When all required information has been received, but not before, we will Respond with a request for some information about plans for development (DPIF) Provide the Program Director with a username and password for the Portal and instructions for its use, including submission of conflicts Add the program to the list of developing programs on CAPTE’s web site 3/22/2016 NEW Requirements to Establish a Review Cycle 49 Needs Assessment Examines local, regional, and national data Statement of Implications of a Summer Graduation To prospective students prior to enrollment ©APTA Department of Accreditation 12/2015 Step 2C: Employ a CEC (SOONER RATHER THAN LATER) Clinical Education Coordinator MUST be employed at time of AFC submission Development of the clinical education component of the program is important and time-consuming Much work needs to be done PRIOR to submission of the AFC An eligible AFC rests in large part on the availability of sufficient clinical placements Support for the PD in decision-making and program development 3/22/2016 Candidacy Process Notification of intent to seek accreditation Notification that a PD has been employed to develop the program. Development of program / AFC •Conflict List •Confirm review cycle Submission of AFC & Staff screen to determine bona fides AFC Review by Candidacy Reviewer / Visit to program / Candidacy Visit Report Respond to visit report CAPTE decision 3/22/2016 Step 3A: Develop the program Contingency Plan Mission, goals of the program (relate to institution) Expected program outcomes Student related policies, procedures, practices Faculty related policies, procedures, practices 3/22/2016 Step 3A: Develop the program Curriculum Expected student outcomes Curriculum plan: organization, sequence, integration, detailed objectives Syllabi for all courses in the technical/professional portion Resources: faculty, space, equipment, learning resources, etc. Clinical Education program All other aspects of the program 3/22/2016 Useful Resources APTA documents Considerations for Developing Programs Normative Models of PT/PTA education Minimum Required Skills.... documents Guide to Physical Therapist Practice (web-based only) Outcomes Assessment in Physical Therapy Education CPI: Clinical Performance Instrument CSIF: Clinical Site Information Form Consultants Contact libbyross@apta.org 3/22/2016 More Useful & Necessary Resources CAPTE Accreditation Handbook Rules of Practice and Procedure Part 7: Candidacy process Part 8: Accreditation process Part 13: Reconsideration of Adverse Decisions Part 14: Appeals Standards and Required Elements Additional information about process Position Papers Principles of Good Practice for Distance Learning in Physical Therapy Education Role and Qualifications of PTA Program Director Expectations and Intent for Full-time Core Faculty in PTA Programs The Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) as a Faculty Credential Physical Therapy Faculty and Scholarship 3/22/2016 Role of Staff Primary role is to facilitate the process Staff are NOT consultants to the program 3/22/2016 Step 3B: Identify Conflicts of Interest Access to Portal gives access to list of members of the Cadre of On-site Reviewers (includes current CAPTE members) Within 2 months of being granted access to the Portal, must identify members of the Cadre in conflict with the program If you do not do this we will stop the process. 3/22/2016 Step 3D: Reconfirm Planned Submission Due 90 days prior to planned submission On or before Dec 1 for Mar 1 submission Mar 1 for Jun 1 submission Sep 1 for Dec 1 submission VIP: if you do not do this, we will stop the process We need the information for planning purposes 3/22/2016 Step 3C: Develop the AFC Current process requires electronic submission using the CAPTE Accreditation Portal The AFC has three components: 1. Narrative responses/Portal fields 2. Uploaded Appendices 3. On-site materials 3/22/2016 60 Formats for Evidence Portal fields Narrative Appendices & Onsite ©APTA Department of Accreditation • Programs enter data that creates forms in report • Written description intended to describe how meeting the Element • NEW: Lists found in instructions • Each item identified only once • Required naming convention for Appendices!! 12/2015 The AFC: Narrative Description of the plan for program in relationship to each of the Standards and to program’s unique mission Addresses every required element, including each of the elements under Standard 7 (Curriculum Content) Must be more than re-statement of the element; provide evidence of current level of compliance and describe how the program plans to meet the element Compose in word processor, cut & paste to portal 3/22/2016 In the AFC Narrative... The requested evidence is intended to answer these generic questions: what’s in place now in preparation for student matriculation? what still needs to be done to be in full compliance? how will full compliance be achieved? Provide the information requested in the evidence list for each element. 3/22/2016 Standards Structure Eight Standards Required Elements for each Standard Evidence of Compliance Portal fields Narrative Appendices (Uploaded Documents) On-site materials 3/22/2016 The AFC Appendices Provide the evidence, i.e., the details, that supports or expands upon the statements made in the narrative Required appendices are listed in the AFC instructions. Provide (upload to portal) the requested information. Required naming conventions* Other information can be uploaded at the discretion of the program 3/22/2016 The AFC: Specified Appendices Relevant catalog(s) Institutional Faculty and Student Handbook Faculty/staff union contract, if applicable Program Policies and Procedures manual (if available) Program Faculty Handbook (if available) Program Student Handbook (if available) Clinical Education Handbook Needs Assessment Content Chart Curriculum Map Policy Location Chart Scholarship Form Etc., etc. 3/22/2016 66 What’s New: Portal Appendix Forms and Names Course List Syllabi & Exams CVs & Scholarship ©APTA Department of Accreditation •Required naming conventions and forms •Divided by terms •Found only in WinZip file •Placed after faculty qualification 12/2015 The AFC: On-site materials Additional evidence to support the program’s current or planned progress toward compliance with the elements Required information listed in the AFC instructions. Make this information available to the Candidacy Reviewer during the visit. Other information at the discretion of the program. Cannot be new materials unless requested by the Candidacy Reviewer 3/22/2016 Making Friends of the CR and CAPTE Follow the instructions for creating the Application for Candidacy on-line Appendices in .pdf format Using required names Bookmarked Large .pdf documents with appropriate bookmarks are preferable to multiple single page documents Page numbers noted in narrative also required 3/22/2016 BREAK (too much work/no play) 3/22/2016 Candidacy Process Notification of intent to seek accreditation Notification that a PD has been employed to develop the program. Development of program / AFC •Conflict List •Confirm review cycle Submission of AFC & Staff screen to determine bona fides AFC Review by Candidacy Reviewer / Visit to program / Candidacy Visit Report Respond to visit report CAPTE decision 3/22/2016 The CAPTE Accreditation Portal Access Login Page www.capteonline.org Step 4A: Submit the AFC Deadlines for submission On or before Mar 1, Jun 1, Dec 1 regardless of whether it is a work day. Have until 11:59 pm ET to click the Submit button Signature Page is due ON OR BEFORE the submission deadline. Fee is due 2 weeks prior to AFC deadline Send it directly to Anastasia DiCicco in an envelope that does not have a window Pre-accreditation fee is described in Part 16 of Rules Deadlines are firm. No exceptions. 3/22/2016 Step 4B: Is it eligible for review? Rules PART 7: §7.10(b) Met the deadline Two representatives, PD and administrator, have attended a DPW; PD attended SSW Submitted by the institution where program is to be housed, degree awarded One electronic copy (in addition to portal) Document is complete: In English Includes responses to all elements, all required forms, documents, etc. 3/22/2016 Step 4B: Is it eligible for review? Signed by CEO, CAO, Dean, PD Agree not to enroll students in professional/technical courses until Candidacy is achieved Agree not to increase class size or enroll more than one cohort per year until Accreditation has been achieved & eligible to seek substantive change Acknowledge CAPTE’s rules about the timing of the initial accreditation visit Candidacy Fee & conflict list have been submitted by the deadlines 3/22/2016 Step 4B: Is it eligible for review? AFC includes AFC eligibility checklist and specified appendices Signature page Preface with all required information Why program is a fit with the institution Process and info used to determine need for program & class size Contingency plan If not provided with Notice of Intent, evidence that the institutional accrediting agency has approved the offering of the physical therapy education program/degree. If institutional accrediting agency approval is not necessary, an explanation of why it is not required. 3/22/2016 Step 4B: Is it eligible for review? AFC includes evidence of PT: at least 3 qualified full-time faculty employed Identification of all faculty needed to implement first 2 years for PT programs PTA: at least 2 qualified full-time faculty employed Identification of all faculty needed to implement first year Program Director meets qualifications Integrated and terminal full-time clinical experiences PTA programs: Program (incl gen ed, pre-reqs) can be completed in 5 semesters or 80 academic weeks or 104 calendar weeks Sufficient clinical education placements to meet requirement 3/22/2016 Sufficient Placements Expectation has five parts: Contractual access to sites Fully executed contracts (copy of 1st pg & sig pg in AFC) If multiple locations identified in contract, include copy of info Adequate number of placements available as per LOIs LOIs for each site, on clinical site letterhead Signed by PT at the site, with credentials noted For first full-time experience AND any part-time clinical experiences that precede it Only this data needed for AFC BUT, should be looking for placements for all experiences Available prior to accreditation granted Appropriate variety 3/22/2016 Sufficient Placements Variety issues that need to be addressed Program expectation for types of experiences Clinical Education sequenced and integrated into the curriculum There are reasons for length/timing of CE experience Students NOT placed in sites they are NOT prepared for Appropriate supervision Educational experience, not OJT or solely observation Complies with state law Supervision provided by PTs (or PTAs if allowable) Level of supervision meets state law 3/22/2016 Determining Sufficient Placements The “150% Rule” For the purpose of determining that the “150% rule” has been met, we will only count placements that have Fully executed contracts, i.e., signed by all parties Letters of Intent Signed by a contact located at the PT site that will be providing the clinical experiences It is acceptable for this signature to be in addition to the signature of another individual who is organizationally responsible for the CE program Sets a definitive number of placements If a range is indicated, we will consider only the lower number for purposes of determining whether the “150% rule” has been met 3/22/2016 Determining Sufficient Placements Lack of inclusion of placements in our count means ONLY that the program has not provided sufficient evidence that those placements can be used to determine that the “150% rule” has been met, which is a requirement for eligibility for review. is NOT a statement about the quality or appropriateness of any individual placement does NOT mean that the program cannot use those placements 3/22/2016 Sample Table (with unacceptable info) Name of Institution: Date: # students enrolled charter class: 150% of the # students enrolled charter class: Name (on contract) City, State ABC College Date Contract Fully Executed 12/10/15 20 30 PT Contact AT SITE (signed LOI) Date LOI Signed Type of Experiences 11/12/15 OP Ortho # Anticipated Placements as documented in LOI – PT 644 PT 666 Counted Part time Full time 4 4 4 P-T 4 F-T Associated PT Santa Fe, NM 11/10/15 Jane Doe, PT Karen Jones, PT/CCE Body Works Taos, NM 1/6/15 George Jackson, Owner, Joe 1/7/15 Smith, PT, OP Ortho 4 4-5 4 P-T 4 F-T Sally Finn, PT 9/12/15 SNF 1 1 0 10/1/15 Frank Stein, PT 8/1/15 OP Ortho 5 4 5 P-T 4 F-T HealthNorth Corp, Brookhaven PT, Taos, NM 10/1/15 Bob Harris, PT 6/7/15 SNF 3 4 0 HealthNorth Corp Ruidoso GH, Ruidoso, NM 10/1/15 Frank Stein, PT 4/2/15 OP Ortho 3 3 0 HealthNorth Corp Santa Fe Acute Care, Santa Fe, NM 10/1/15 Bob Harris, PT 7/7/15 IP Acute Care 4 4 4 P-T 4 F-T HealthNorth Corp – TrueCare, Santa Fe, NM Ann Brown, OT Home Care 4 3 0 6/1/15 Mercy Hospital Albuquerque, NM 6/20/15 Peter Green, PT OP Ortho 4 3 0 Mercy Hospital Santa Fe, NM 4/1/15 Helen Foster, PT Acute Care 2-3 2-3 Care First Nursing Home Sante Fe, NM HealthNorth Corp Bellport Nursing & Rehab, Albuquerque, NM 5/1/15 35 Reduced class size of 12 2 P-T 3/22/2016 2 F-T 34 19 P-T 18 F-T BREAK 3/22/2016 If determined to be NOT eligible for review... Program notified of missing information Opportunity to provide within two hours If still not eligible, opportunity to challenge the determination by informing staff of the challenge. Staff will immediately consult with the Chair of CAPTE (or a designee) to decide whether the staff determination should stand and will inform the program of the final determination (if not eligible, can request next available candidacy cycle) 3/22/2016 AFC of Record Once determined to be eligible for review, the AFC submitted on the Portal is considered to be the Application For Candidacy of Record Except for the response to the Candidacy Visit Report, no additional information may be added to it unless specifically requested by the Candidacy Reviewer, CAPTE or staff 3/22/2016 Candidacy Process Notification of intent to seek accreditation Notification that a PD has been employed to develop the program. Development of program / AFC •Conflict List •Confirm review cycle Submission of AFC & Staff screen to determine bona fides AFC Review by Candidacy Reviewer / Visit to program / Candidacy Visit Report Respond to visit report CAPTE decision 3/22/2016 Step 5A: CR Assignment Candidacy Reviewer assigned by staff Experienced on-site reviewers Application for Candidacy made available to CR on portal 3/22/2016 Step 5B: CR Visit CR reviews document Under no obligation to review additional material provided before or during the visit unless requested CR makes 2-day (spread over 3) visit to verify that what is reported in the AFC is accurate. Dates negotiated between CR and PD Half-day, Full-day, Half-day Interviews with pertinent individuals at institution Review of space, support services Review of on-site documents Brief Exit Summary 3/22/2016 Step 5C: CR Visit Report CR submits a written report to CAPTE for review and editing. Report sent to Program 3/22/2016 Candidacy Process Notification of intent to seek accreditation Notification that a PD has been employed to develop the program. Development of program / AFC •Conflict List •Confirm review cycle Submission of AFC & Staff screen to determine bona fides AFC Review by Candidacy Reviewer / Visit to program / Candidacy Visit Report Respond to visit report CAPTE decision 3/22/2016 Step 6: Respond to Visit Report Program has opportunity to respond to the Candidacy Visit Report Correct errors of fact Correct misinterpretations Provide information requested by the Candidacy Reviewer Response due 30 days after receipt of report; 4-5 weeks prior to CAPTE review No additional material accepted before the meeting, unless specifically requested by CAPTE or staff. 3/22/2016 Candidacy Process Notification of intent to seek accreditation Notification that a PD has been employed to develop the program. Development of program / AFC •Conflict List •Confirm review cycle Submission of AFC & Staff screen to determine bona fides AFC Review by Candidacy Reviewer / Visit to program / Candidacy Visit Report Respond to visit report CAPTE decision 3/22/2016 Step 7: CAPTE decision Decision based on review of AFC Candidacy Visit Report with Institution Comments Candidacy Visit Report Response to the visit report Additional materials provided on request Third-party comment, if any, & program response Decision made in light of established expectations for Candidacy Options: Grant Candidate for Accreditation Deny Candidate for Accreditation 3/22/2016 Summary of Action Feedback about progress to date Unsatisfactory progress Other areas in need of further development Suggestions for development All elements must be addressed in the program’s Self-study Report whether or not CAPTE has made a comment in the Candidacy SOA 3/22/2016 What happens after Candidacy Implementation of Program Annual Report submission (abbreviated) Reporting other changes Prepare Self-study Report Submit SSR and initial accreditation fee On-site visit Penultimate term that charter class is enrolled CAPTE Accreditation Decision Before graduation of charter class 3/22/2016 Common Issues that lead to Denial Faculty not qualified No development plan(s), or inappropriate plans, for questionably qualified faculty Curriculum issues Incomplete/poorly constructed curriculum Inappropriate sequencing of courses Poorly written objectives Objectives don’t indicate highest level of learning Lack of connection between content and objectives No PT in the picture (PTA programs) Skills beyond scope of PTA 3/22/2016 Common Issues that lead to Denial Safety issues Critical safety indicators missing or non-specific Practical examinations Under-developed / inappropriate assessment plans Clinical Education program/sites lacking Failure to follow directions Missing information 3/22/2016 Due Process after Denial Reconsideration of decision by CAPTE At either of the next two meetings Appeal of reconsideration decision to APTA Appeal Panel appointed by APTA Executive Committee 3/22/2016 Withdrawal of Candidacy CAPTE reserves right to withdraw candidacy if situation changes such that CAPTE believes that the quality of the program is compromised Most common reason is faculty leave and are not replaced in a timely manner or with qualified individuals Adverse Decision subject to reconsideration and appeal Expect program to suspend classes at end of term and until situation is resolved 3/22/2016 Communication Most communication with programs is via email only Candidacy Decision lists posted on web approximately 10 days after decisions All decisions are reflected Reasons for final adverse decisions (which includes deny candidacy when final) What’s New (on web page) 3/22/2016 Takeaways Revisited This is a rigorous process designed to foster quality from the beginning We’ve given you a roadmap, follow the directions The burden of proof is on the program Doing it right the first time increases chance of success The Rules change frequently, keep up with them 3/22/2016 101 Candidate for Accreditation It is a pre-accreditation status, awarded prior to enrollment of students in the technical/professional phase of the program, which indicates that the physical therapy education program is progressing toward accreditation Pre-accreditation process ensures program implemented following adequate planning Attainment of Candidate for Accreditation status does not assure accreditation by CAPTE The Role of the Candidacy Reviewer (CR) (1 of 3) Is a representative of CAPTE, not a consultant to the program Possesses a firm understanding of the standards and elements and required evidence for Candidacy 12/2015 The Role of the Candidacy Reviewer (2 of 3) Reviews the Application for Candidacy (AFC) in detail prior to the visit Contacts the program director prior to visit for additional materials as appropriate 12/2015 The Role of the Candidacy Reviewer (3 of 3) Submits a report of findings within 2 weeks after the visit Interviews and Exit Summary (presented on site) Verifies & clarifies the AFC Triangulation of data Identifies missing/incomplete/insufficient items in CVR 12/2015 What CAPTE 105 needs… Evidence! Sufficient information to determine that the education to be provided will lead to competent PTs/PTAs Specific/Detailed information 2016 Standards 106 1 Mission, Goals, & Outcomes 2 Assessment, Planning 3 Institution & Program Integrity 4 Program Faculty 5 Students 6 Curriculum Plan 7 Curricular Content 8 Resources ©APTA Department of Accreditation 12/2015 Standard 1 107 The program meets graduate achievement measures and program outcomes related to its mission and goals. 1A Mission 1B Goals 1C Student Achievement & Program Outcomes 1C1 Graduation Rates 1C2 Licensure Pass Rates 1C3 Employment Rates 1C4 Entry-level Performance 1C5 Graduate Outcomes 1C6 Other Program Outcomes ©APTA Department of Accreditation 108 1C4 Students Demonstrate Entry-Level Performance Prior to Graduation Minimum Expectation: Processes developed to determine that each student achieves entry level clinical performance prior to graduation. Describe the processes that will be used to determine that each student achieves entry level clinical performance prior to graduation. ©APTA Department of Accreditation 12/2015 109 1C5 & 1C6 Expected Program Outcomes Minimum Expectation: A written statement of the program's expected graduate outcomes. Minimum Expectation: A written statement of the expected program outcomes that are based on the goals. ©APTA Department of Accreditation 12/2015 Standard 2 110 The program is engaged in effective, on-going, formal, comprehensive processes for selfassessment and planning for the purpose of program improvement 2A Ongoing, Formal Assessment Process 2B Assessment of: 2B1 Admission 2B4 Resources 2B2 Enrollment 2B5 Policies 2B3 Faculty 2C Curriculum Assessment 2D Long-term Planning ©APTA Department of Accreditation 12/2015 Standard 3 The institution and program operate with integrity 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H State Authorization Institutional Accreditation Policies: Workload & Academic Standards Policies: Nondiscrimination Policies: Faculty & Staff Policies: Outside of Due Process Policies: Compatibility Policies: Accreditation Compliance (3H1-3H5) ©APTA Department of Accreditation 12/2015 STANDARD 4 Standard 4 112 The program faculty are qualified for their roles and effective in carrying out their responsibilities 4A Core Faculty Qualifications 4I Clinical Education Coordinator Qualifications 4B Core Faculty: PTA: clinical experience; 4J Clin Ed Coordinator: Effectiveness PT: Scholarship 4C Core Faculty: Services 4K Collective Faculty: Blend 4D Associated Faculty Qualifications 4L Collective: Academic Regulations 4E Core Faculty: Assessment 4M Collective: Curriculum 4F Associated Faculty: Assessment 4N Collective: Determine Readiness 4G PD: Qualifications 4O Clinical Education Faculty ©APTA Department of Accreditation 4H PD: Effective Leadership 12/2015 Core versus Associated Faculty 113 Core Associated Employed primarily in entry-level program Adjunct and/or supportive faculty Includes program administrator & ACCE/DCE as well as clinical education faculty Anyone who is NOT core or clinical education faculty Responsibility & authority for curriculum Plays a supportive role in the implementation of curriculum Typically F/T but can be P/T Can include those with F/T appointments in unit ©APTA Department of Accreditation 12/15/15 4A Individual Core Faculty Qualifications 114 Requires evidence that all program faculty are qualified for all aspects of the program for which they are responsible Identify current expertise in content areas, including academic preparation beyond entry level. Describe any existing formal development plan(s) 12/2015 4A Individual Core Faculty Qualifications 115 Student assessment and evaluation Core faculty teaching clinical content must be licensed For PT programs: each core faculty member must have doctoral preparation, effective 1/1/2020 unless enrolled in academic doctoral program, in which case the time is extended to 12/31/2025. The DPT or tDPT satisfies this requirement. 12/2015 116 4B PTA: Post-licensure Clinical Experience; PT: Scholarship PTA: minimum of 3 years of post-licensure clinical experience PT: evidence of a well-defined, ongoing scholarly agenda 12/2015 117 4C Each Core Faculty Member Record of Service And 4D Associated Faculty Contemporary Expertise Service activities Associated faculty expertise (required of anyone that teaches content in the program other than core or clinical education faculty) 12/2015 118 4E and 4F Formal and Regular Evaluation of Core Faculty Evaluation and Assessment expected for: Core Faculty Associated faculty 12/2015 4G Program Director Qualifications - PTA 119 Minimum for PTA programs: Must be a licensed PT or PTA Minimum of 5 years, F/T, post licensure experience with a minimum of 3 years of F/T clinical experience; or equivalent; didactic and/or clinical teaching experience; experience in administration/management Experience in educational theory & methodology, instructional design, student evaluation and outcome assessment. As of 2018, will have to include equivalent of 9 credits of academic coursework in educational foundations. 12/2015 4G Program Director Qualifications - PT 120 Minimum for PT programs: Must be a licensed PT Earned academic doctoral degree; may seek an exemption Minimum of 6 years higher education experience; 3 years F/T in PT Program Rank of: Professor or Associate Professor (clinical track is acceptable) 12/2015 4H Program Director- Leadership 121 Expectation for evidence of the PD as an effective: Communicator Planner Manager of human and fiscal resources Promoter of professional development Demonstrated through such things as: Strategic planning Advocating for program support within institution Understanding curriculum content, design and evaluation Active service to profession 12/2015 4I Clinical Education Director 122 Must be licensed (can be a PTA for a PTA program) Experience must include experiences as CCCE or CI, OR Experience teaching, curriculum development & administration in a PT or PTA education program (PTA) / in a PT education program (PT) 12/2015 4J Clinical Education Director - Effectiveness 123 Need evidence that the clinical education director is effective in their role For developing programs, evidence will focus on planning 12/2015 4K, 4 L-N Collective Core Faculty 124 4K – Blend collective ability to meet program needs For PT: expectation for at least 50% of core faculty to have academic degrees 4L – policies Collective core adopt, uphold, develop policies 4M – Ownership of curriculum Collective core develop and implement curriculum 4N – ensures student readiness to engage in clinical education 12/2015 4O Clinical Education Faculty 125 Minimum requirement: licensed, PTs (or PTAs for PTA programs); one year of full-time (or equivalent) post-licensure clinical experience; and are effective role models and teachers Evidence of planned mechanisms to determine qualifications and effectiveness of clinical instructors 12/2015 Standard 5 126 The program recruits, admits and graduates students consistent with the missions and goals of the institution and the program and consistent with societal needs for physical therapy services for a diverse population. 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E Policies: Recruitment & Admission Communication of Policies Enrollment Agreements Policies: Students Policies: Student Retention & Progression 12/2015 127 Standard 6 The program has a comprehensive curriculum plan. 12/2015 32 6A The Curriculum Plan is Based on Contemporary Knowledge and Practice 6B General Education (PTA), Bachelor’s Degree or Upper Division Academic Coursework (PT) 6C (PT) Rationale for Prerequisites 12/2015 32 6C (PTA)/6D (PT) Curriculum Model and Foundational Principles 6D (PTA)/6E (PT) Organized, Sequential, Integrated Courses 12/2015 130 6E (PTA) and 6G (PT) Syllabi The narrative response will only refer reader to syllabi Syllabi must be complete according to the bulleted evidence list Syllabi attached to Course Details page and accessed through WinZip file 12/2015 131 PTA PT Appendices ©APTA Department of Accreditation • 6F: Objectives • 6G: Instructional Methods • 6H: Tests and Measures • 6F: Interprofessional Education • 6H: Objectives • Example of Practical Exam and Grading Rubric • Skills Check • CE Tool Assess Student (if not the CPI or PT/PTA MACS) 12/2015 132 6I (PTA) and 6K (PT) Distance Education Faculty are Effective Rigor of Courses is Comparable to Site-Based Programs Integrity of Tests Appropriate Policies and Procedures 12/2015 6J (PTA) and 6L (PT) Clinical Education Experiences 133 Management of patients with diseases and conditions representative of those commonly seen in practice across lifespan and continuum of care; Practice settings representative of those in which physical therapy is commonly practiced. 12/2015 6J (PTA) and 6L (PT) Clinical Education Experiences (continued…) 134 (NEW!): involvement in interprofessional practice Practice settings representative of those in which physical therapy is commonly practiced. PTA: participation as a member of the PT and PTA team; PT: provides direction and supervision of the physical therapist assistant and other physical therapy personnel; Other experiences that lead to achievement of the program’s expected outcomes 12/2015 135 Program Length & Degree 6K and 6L (PTA) / 6M and 6N (PT) PTA: Program completed in no more than 5 semesters, 80 academic weeks, OR 104 calendar weeks; Associate’s degree is awarded PT: Program comprised of at least 90 semester credit hours (or equivalent) in no less than 6 semesters (or equivalent); clinical education is a minimum of 30 weeks; DPT is awarded 12/2015 136 STANDARD 7 – PT Foundational Content 7A, 7B, 7C 7A: biological, physical, behavioral, and movement sciences 7B: communication, ethics and values, management, finance, teaching and learning, law, clinical reasoning, evidenced-based practice, and applied statistics 7C: clinical sciences 12/2015 137 STANDARD 7 – PTA General Education and the Role of the PTA 7A, 7B, 7C 7A: Academic General Education 7B: Curriculum includes cardiovascular, endocrine and metabolic, gastrointestinal, genital and reproductive, hematologic, hepatic and biliary, immune, integumentary, lymphatic, musculoskeletal, nervous, respiratory, and renal and urologic systems; and the medical and surgical conditions across the lifespan commonly seen by physical therapist assistants. 7C: Curriculum content and learning experiences prepare students to work under the direction and supervision of the PT 12/2015 138 The 7Ds Practice Expectations 7D1-7D31 for PTA; 7D1-7D43 for PT All elements should be covered. The narrative must describe where and how content is covered. The Curriculum Map appendix will support (not substitute) the narrative. 12/2015 STANDARD 8 139 Resources The program resources are sufficient to meet the current and projected needs of the program with respect to the following: 8A Core faculty 8B Administrative/Secretarial & Technical Support 8C Financial Resources 12/2015 STANDARD 8 140 Resources (continued…) The program resources are sufficient to meet the current and projected needs of the program with respect to the following: 8D Space, Equipment, Technology, & Materials 8E Library & Learning Resource Centers 12/2015 STANDARD 8 141 Resources (continued…) The program resources are sufficient to meet the current and projected needs of the program with respect to the following: 8F Clinical Education Sites 8G Written Clinical Education Agreements 8H Student Services 12/2015 Questions? Anastasia DiCicco Preaccreditation Specialist anastasiadicicco@apta.org For Portal Questions: Tej Chana Database Specialist tejchana@apta.org ©APTA Department of Accreditation 12/2015