ETHICS, CONTROLS AND DISCLOSURE: EXPLORING THE NEW FINAL RULE Robert J. Sherry K&L Gates Dallas, TX / San Francisco, CA December 3, 2008 OVERVIEW Introduction Three Major Components of Revised FAR Coverage Code of Ethics/Conduct Internal Controls Disclosure Obligations Other Features of the Final Rule Critical Sample Issues Conclusion 1 INTRODUCTION Final Rule: 73 Fed. Reg. 67064 (November 12, 2008) Effective Date: December 12, 2008 (but see later comments) Genesis: 2007 DOJ request to OFPP for additional regulation “Close the Contractor Fraud Loophole Act” (enacted 2008) Principal Impacts: Mandatory internal controls for certain contractors/subcontractors Disclosure obligations if “credible evidence” exists of certain violations of law New causes for debarment/suspension relating to failures to disclose 2 REVISED FAR COVERAGE Code of Ethics/Conduct Now required for commercial item contracts/subcontracts (and all other contracts/subcontracts containing FAR 52.203-13) To be inserted in contracts/subcontracts over $5M, performance period of 120 or more days Effective 30 days after contract award (unless CO agrees to later date) Obligations: Code of Ethics/Conduct “Make available” to each performing employee “Due diligence” to prevent/detect criminal conduct “Promote compliance” with code 3 REVISED FAR COVERAGE Internal Controls Not required for commercial item contracts/subcontracts Effective 90 days after contract award (unless CO agrees to later date) Previous regulation: internal control “examples” Final rule: “Minimum requirements” in 52.203-13 Ethics awareness/training High-level oversight/adequate resources “Reasonable” efforts -- “compliant principals” Periodic compliance reviews Anonymous or confidential “hotline” (or similar mechanism) Disciplinary action for improper conduct Timely disclosure to IG/CO of specified legal violations Disclosure obligation lasts until three years after final payment Cooperation with government reviews 4 REVISED FAR COVERAGE Disclosure Obligations Applies to all contracts/subcontracts for three years after final payment Two sources: 52.203-13 Revised debarment/suspension regulations What must be disclosed? “Credible evidence” that a principal, employee, agent or subcontractor has committed Certain criminal violations -- fraud, conflicts of interest, bribery, gratuities Civil False Claims Act violations Also must disclose “significant overpayments” (other than contract financing overpayments) To whom is disclosure made? See FAR 52.203-13: Agency IG Copy to CO If GWAC or similar contract, to “ordering” and “contracting” agency IGs Some agency IGs are beginning to develop disclosure protocols 5 OTHER FEATURES OF THE FINAL RULE FAR modifications “Integrity and business ethics” now past performance information Cause for debarment: “knowing failure” by principal to disclose “credible evidence” of violation (preponderance standard) Cause for suspension: same, but “adequate evidence” standard Modifications of FAR 52.203-13 clause to reflect changes discussed earlier regarding code, controls, disclosure 6 SAMPLE CRITICAL ISSUES Initial thoughts -- more to come/evolve Commercial item contract status -- another reason to accept only commercial item contracts/subcontracts if feasible To disclose or not to disclose? Balancing investigatory conclusion (no violation) vs. more aggressive government view What is “credible evidence”? What “overpayments” must be disclosed? E.g., in GSA contract context, must you disclose potential IFF underpayments/price reduction clause violations? What will COs do with information? Increase in nonresponsibility determinations? Past performance evaluation issues 7 CONCLUSION Standards in final rule -- subject to evolving interpretation Examine existing code of ethics/conduct Examine internal controls Examine completed investigations for “open” contracts Other “open” contract issues? 8 QUESTIONS? Bob Sherry (214) 939-4945 (415) 249-1032 robert.sherry@klgates.com 9