Systems Biology Approach to Biomarker Discovery

advertisement

Integrative Omics for Cancer

Biology

Xiang Zhang, PhD

Department of Chemistry

Center for Regulatory and Environmental Analytical Metabolomics

University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 xiang.zhang@louisville.edu

Systems Biology

is a field in biology aiming at systems level understanding of biological processes, where a bunch of parts that are connected to one another and work together. It attempts to create predictive models of cells, organs, biochemical processes and complete organisms.

• Integrative systems biology

Extracting biological knowledge from the ‘omics through integration

• Predictive systems biology

Predicting future of biosystem using

‘omics knowledge, e.g. in-silico biosystems

Davidov, E.; Clish, C. B.; Oresic, M.; Zhang, X; et al. Omics: A Journal of Integrative Biology. 2004, 8, 267-288.

Clish, C. B.; Davidov, E.; Oresic, M.; Zhang, X; et al. Omics: A Journal of Integrative Biology. 2004, 8, 3-13.

Omics Space

Differential omics is the beginning of

Systems Biology molecule cell tissue organism

Differential Proteomics &

Metabolomics

1.

Differential proteomics and metabolomics are qualitative and quantitative comparison of proteome and metabolome under different conditions that should unravel complex biological processes

2.

It can be used to study any scientific phenomena that may change the proteome and/or metabolome of a living system.

NIH

 Cancer Biomarker Discovery

Nano-medicine

 Environment

Food and nutrition preventative medicine

Biomarker Discovery is Major

Research Field of Differential Omics

Biomarkers are naturally occurring biomolecules useful for measuring the prognosis and/or progress of diseases and therapies.

 These substances may be normally present in small amounts in the blood or other tissues

When the amounts of these substances change, they may indicate disease.

Valid biomarkers should

 demonstrate drug activity sooner

 facilitate clinical trial design by defining patient populations

 optimize dosing for safety and efficacy

 be sensitive and easy to assay to speed drug development

What Types of Change Are

Expected?

Protein structure unchanged degradation

Protein structure is changed concentration posttranslational modification

Sensing structural change is a major element of comparative proteomics

Most of metabolomics works focus on concentration change only.

sequence

(mutation)

Challenges in Proteomics

 Sample complexity

 About 25K types of protein coding-genes present in human. IPI human database (v3.25) has 67,250 entries, which could generate about 10 6-8 peptides

 More than one hundred post translational modifications

(PTMs) could happen in a proteome

 Large protein concentration difference

 10 7-8 in human cells, and at least 10 12 in human plasma

 Dynamic range of a LC-MS is about 10 4-6

 The top 12 high abundant proteins constitute approximately 95% of total protein mass of plasma/serum

 Albumin, IgG, Fibrinogen, Transferrin, IgA, IgM,

Haptoglobin, alpha 2-Macroglobulin, alpha 1-Acid

Glycoprotein, alpha 1-Antitrypsin and HDL (Apo A-I &

Apo A-II).

Dynamic system, large subject variation

Body Fluid profiling: biomarker platform

Generic

Sample prep.

Focused

Sample prep.

 g/ml ng/ml pg/ml

High concentration compounds

Low concentration compounds

Challenges in Metabolomics

•Metabolites have a wide range of molecular weights and large variations in concentration

•The metabolome is much more dynamic than proteome and genome, which makes the metabolome more time sensitive

•Metabolites can be either polar or nonpolar, as well as organic or inorganic molecules.

This makes the chemical separation a key step in metabolomics

•Metabolites have chemical structures , which makes the identification using MS an extreme challenge cholesta-3,5-diene

Differential Omics

biomarker discovery

Diseased

A

B

C

D

Z

A

B

C

D

Z

S1 S2 S3

A

B

C

D

Z

A

B

C

D

Z

S4

Healthy

A

B

C

D

Z

A

B

C

D

Z

S5 S6

A

B

C

D

Z

S7

A

B

C

D

Z

S8

Informatics Platform

LIMS

Quality control data re-examination

Molecular networks

Protein

Function

Interaction

Correlation

Significance test

Regulated peaks

Molecular identification

Pattern recognition

Cluster loadings

Molecular validation

Pathway modeling

Regulated molecules

Unidentified molecules targeted tandem MS

Roadmap

Systems Biology Differential omics

1. Experimental design

2. Molecular identification

3. Data preprocessing

4. Statistical significance test

5. Pattern recognition

6. Molecular networks

MDLC Platforms

• MudPIT, i.e. SCX followed by RP

• The proteome is split into 10-20X more fractions

• There is carry-over between fractions

• LC fractions generally still are too complex for MS

• Affinity Selection

• Avidin selection of Cys-containing peptides

• Cu-IMAC for His-containing peptides

• Ga-IMAC for phosphorylated peptides

• Lectins for glycosylated peptides

AP

Sample

APR

AP

Digestion

SCX

F1 F2 F2 F2

RPC-MS

Qiu, R.; Zhang, X. and Regnier, F. E. J. Chromatogr. B. 2007, 845, 143-150.

Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; and Regnier, F. E. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 949, 153-162.

Regnier, F. E.; Amini, A.; Chakraborty, A.; Geng, M.; Ji, J.; Sioma, C.; Wang, S.; and Zhang, X. LC/GC 2001, 19(2), 200-213.

Geng, M.; Zhang, X.; Bina, M.; and Regnier, F. E. J. Chromatogr. B 2001, 752, 293-306.

In-Gel Stable Isotope Labeling

a sample gel based platform

• Avoiding gel-to-gel variability

• Only labeling K-containing peptides

• Accurate quantification d)

Asara, J. M.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, B.; Christofk, H. H.; Wu, N.; Cantley, L. C. Nature Protocols, 2006, 1, 46-51. .

Asara, J. M.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, B.; Christofk, H. H.; Wu, N.; Cantley, L. C. J. Proteome Res., 2006, 5, 155-163.

Ji, J.; Chakraborty, A.; Geng M.; Zhang, X.; Amini, A.; Bina, M.; and Regnier, F. E. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 745, 197-210.

Roadmap

Systems Biology Differential omics

1. Experimental design

2. Molecular identification protein identification metabolite identification

3. Data preprocessing

4. Statistical significance test

5. Pattern recognition

6. Molecular networks

Protein Identification

database searching

The database searching approach uses a protein database to find a peptide for which a theoretically predicted spectrum best matches experimental data.

Protein

Peptide

Mass matched peptide

Protein Identification

database searching

More than 20 algorithms have been developed.

Sequest

Spectrum Mill

Mascot

X! Tandem

OMSSA

1.

About 20% of tandem ms spectra could provide confident peptide identification

2.

< 50% of peptides can be identified by all algorithms

Zhang, X.; Oh, C.; Riley, C. P.; Buck, C. Current Proteomics 2007, 4, 121-130.

Protein Identification

de novo sequencing de novo sequencing reconstructs the partial or complete sequence of a peptide directly from its MS/MS spectrum.

Performance of de novo method is limited by low mass accuracy, mass equivalence, and completeness of fragmentation.

Pevtsov, S.; Fedulova, I.; Mirzaei, H.; Buck, C.; Zhang, X. Journal of Proteome Research. 2006, 5, 3018-3028.

Fedulova, I.; Ouyang, Z.; Buck, C.; Zhang, X. The Open Spectroscopy Journal 2007, 1, 1-8.

Incorporating Peptide Separation

Information for Protein Identification

structure of pattern classifier

Input layer

Hidden layer

Output layer

Oh, C.; Zak, S. H.; Mirzaei, H.; Regnier, F. E.; Zhang, X. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 114-118.

Training the ANNs with Generic

Algorithm

h ji o kj t t h j j t t o k t t j j t t

Oh, C.; Zak, S. H.; Mirzaei, H.; Regnier, F. E.; Zhang, X. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 114-118.

Protein Identification Using Multiple

Algorithms and Predicted Peptide

Separation in HPLC

PIUMA architecture

Raw LC/MS/MS data

2

Unmatched spectra

Unknown modification search

Protein List mzData or mzXML format

Processed MS/

MS data

3

1

Database seraching

Unmatched spectra

De novo sequencing

Mascot

Sequest

X! Tandem

Lutefisk novoHMM

Peaks

Peptide List

Peptide List Color legend existing algorithms algorithms to be developed method descriptions

Oh, C.; Zak, S. H.; Mirzaei, H.; Regnier, F. E. and Zhang, X. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23, 114-118.

Zhang, X.; Oh, C.; Riley, C. P.; Buck, C. Current Proteomics 2007, 4, 121-130.

Roadmap

Systems Biology Differential omics

1. Experimental design

2. Molecular identification

3. Data preprocessing

Spectrum deconvolution

Quality control

Alignment

Normalization

4. Statistical significance test

5. Pattern recognition

6. Molecular networks

Spectrum Deconvolution

GISTool, single sample analysis

1.

To differentiate signals arising from the real analytes as opposed to signals arising from contaminants or instrument noise

2.

To reduce data dimensionality, which will benefit down stream statistical analysis.

Functionality •Smoothing and centralization

•Peak cluster detection

• Charge recognition

• De-isotope

•Peak identification at LC level

•Doublet recognition

•Doublet quantification

GISTool Algorithm

Deconvoluting MS spectra

748.6354 3+

748.9694 2+

Single sample analysis

Zhang, X.; Hines, W.; Adamec, J.; Asara, J.; Naylor, S.; and Regnier, F. E. J. Am. Soc. Mass

Spectrom. 2005, 16, 1181-1191.

Quality Assessment / Control

• Biological Sample QA/C

• protein assay

• Experimental Data QA/C

• 2D K-S test

• Percentile of detected peaks

• Percentile of aligned peaks

• Retention time variance vs. retention time

• m/z variance vs. retention time

• Frequency distribution of RT & m/z variance

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 sample ID

7 8 9 10

20 30 40 retention time (min)

50 60

Zhang, X.; Asara, J. M.; Adamec, J.; Ouzzani, M.; and Elmagarmid, A. K.

Bioinformatics, 2005, 21, 4054-4059.

Data Alignment

To recognize peaks of the same molecule occurring in different samples from the thousands of peaks detected during the course of an experiment.

1. MS to MS data alignment

•Referenced alignment

•Blind alignment

•Quality depending on the information of peak detection

2. MS to MS/MS data alignment

•Depends on experimental design

LC-MS Data Alignment

XAlign software for proteomics & metabolomics data

•Detecting median sample

M j

=

I i,j

M i,j

/

I i,j

T j

=

I i,j

T i,j

/

I i,j

D i s

=

|T i,j j=1

-

µ j

|

•Aligning samples to the median sample

0.8

0.4

0

-0.4

-0.8

10

10000

20 30 40 retention time (min)

50 60 70

Zhang, X.; Asara, J. M.; Adamec, J.; Ouzzani, M.; and Elmagarmid, A. K.

Bioinformatics, 2005, 21, 4054-4059.

1000

100

10

10 y = 1.3636x + 16.511

R

2

= 0.9475

100 1000 intensity of aligned peaks (sample 1)

10000

Chromatogram of Serum Analyzed on GC

GC/TOF-MS

GCxGC-MS Data Alignment

metabolite component of human serum

• Four dimension

• 1535 peaks have been detected

GCxGC/TOF-MS Data Alignment

MSort software for metabolomics

Oh, C.; Huang, X.; Buck, C.; Regnier, F. E. and Zhang, X. J. Chromatogr. A. 2008, 1179, 205-215

Criteria for alignment

• 1 st dim. rt

• 2 nd dim. rt

• spec. correlation

Features

*peak entry merging

*cont. exclusion

Analysis Results of MAlign

53 standard acids

1000

800

10 x 10

5

8

6 600

4

400

2

200

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

The number of peak entries in a row of alignment table

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

The number of peak entries in a row of alignment table

1.

8 [ OA + FA ] samples and 8 [ AA + FA ] samples

2.

derivatization reagent: (N-Methyl-N-t-butyldimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide ( MTBSTFA )

Oh, C.; Huang, X.; Buck, C.; Regnier, F. E. and Zhang, X. J. Chromatogr. A. 2008, 1179, 205-215

Normalization

To reduce concentration effect and experimental variance to make the data comparable.

Methods

1.

Log linear model x ij

= a i

 r j

 e ij

2.

Reference sample normalization

0 200

3.

Auto-scaling

4.

Constant mean / trimmed constant mean

5.

Constant median / trimmed constant median

400 600 peak index

800 1000

CV Distribution of Peak Intensities

human serum sample

Before Normalization

20.7%

Intensity Variation

0.0

0.2

0.4

CV

0.6

0.8

1.0

After Normalization

0.0

0.2

0.4

CV

0.6

0.8

1.0

Intensity Variation

Log linear model: x ij

= a i

 r j

 e ij log(x ij

) = log(a i

) + log(r j

) + log(e ij

)

17.3%

0.2

0.4

CV

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.2

0.4

CV

0.6

0.8

1.0

Roadmap

Systems Biology Differential omics

1. Experimental design

2. Molecular identification

3. Data preprocessing

4. Statistical significance test

5. Pattern recognition

6. Molecular networks

Statistical Significance Tests

To find individual peaks for which there are significant differences between groups.

Methods

1.

Pair-wise t-test (diff. mean?)

2.

Mann-Whitney U test (diff. median?)

3.

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (diff. population?)

4.

Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance

Statistical Significance Tests

metabolome of great blue heron fertilized eggs contaminated by PCBs

PCBs: polychlorinated biphenyls down-regulated up-regulated fold change = I_c / I_n blue line: p=0.05

dashed line: fold change = 0

-3 -2 -1 0 fold change (log)

1 2 3

Roadmap

Systems Biology Differential omics

1. Experimental design

2. Molecular identification

3. Data preprocessing

4. Statistical significance test

5. Pattern recognition

6. Molecular networks

Clustering or Classification

Resulting pattern recognition provides the first glimpse of improvement in understanding the underlying biology.

Unsupervised Methods

Principle component analysis (PCA)

Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)

Clustering objects on subsets of attributes (COSA)

Supervised Methods

Support vector machine (SVM)

Artificial neural network (ANN)

Cross Species Comparison

27 of the 28 control humans and all 8 control rats cluster to one group

11 of the 14 diseased human and all diseased rats cluster to second group

Differential Metabolomics of

Human Blood

breast cancer samples vs. control samples

Differential Metabolomics of

Human Blood

breast cancer samples vs. control samples

Roadmap

Systems Biology Differential omics

1. Experimental design

2. Protein identification

3. Data preprocessing

4. Statistical significance test

5. Pattern recognition

6. Molecular networks correlation network interaction network regulation network pathway analysis

Molecular Correlation Analysis

pair wised correlation of proteins and metabolites

Diseased

A

B

C

D

Z

A

B

C

D

Z

S1 S2 S3

A

B

C

D

Z

A

B

C

D

Z

S4

Healthy

A

B

C

D

Z

A

B

C

D

Z

S5 S6

A

B

C

D

Z

S7

A

B

C

D

Z

S8

Molecular Correlation Network

an example of drug effect on disease state

•Reveal important relationships among the various

GP-1a

L-6b

L-7a

L-7b

L-8a

L-12b

Emb

Tiss

ALP

L-24b

L-6a

GP-1b

L-20b

ApoA1_6

L-24a

L-19b

L-27b

L-15b

L-15a

L-14b

L-14a

L-1b

L-26b

L-20a

L-27a

L-13b

L-1a

L-16a

L-13a

ApoE_1

L-5a

L-11a

L-5b

SerPI_II_2

L-11b

L-18a

L-18b

L-28b

L-26a

L-12a

L-21b

L-21a

C18:1

LPC

L-9a

L-9b components

•Complimentary to abundance level information

•Provides information about the biochemical processes underlying the disease or drug response

Unkn1

C52:2 TG

L-10b

C33:1 PC

FBGB phenylalanine alanine

C18:2 LPC

C54:5 TG

C32:0 PC

C30:0 PC

C24:1 SPM

C24:0 SPM a-glucose

L-10a

L-8b

AMBP

L-17b

L-17a

ALB

TP

C52:1 TG

C50:4 TG

FetuinA_2

L-22a

L-23b

L-28a

A1MG_5

C52:5 TG alanine

L-23a

C54:5 TG leucine valine

L-22b

A1MG_2 valine

L-19a

K

C34:2 PC formate

C32:1 PC

L-16b

C52:3 TG glutamine glutamine tyrosine

C52:4 TG isoleucine glutamine

BUN

C58:5 TG

A1I3_3

C34:1 PC

C36:2 PC

C36:1 PC

GLUC

C54:3 TG

C54:2 TG

HDL

C20:4 CE

ApoA1_5

C54:1 TG

C54:6 TG

C52:6 TG

C58:3 TG

C56:3 TG

C58:4 TG

C56:2 TG

C22:5 CE lactate

ITIH3_1

Afamin_2 valine glutamine

TRIG leucine

NEFA

GLYC

C60:3 TG

C58:2 TG

C60:4 TG

C16:1 CE valine

C16:1 LPC tyrosine creatine lactate tyrosine lactate acetate tyrosine lactate alanine creatine

C38:4 PC tyrosine C46:1 TG isoleucine C48:1 TG lactate lactate phenylalanine

C20:5 CE C36:4 PC

C20:3 CE

Plasminogen

C19:0 LPC

C56:4 TG

C22:6 CE

C18:3 CE

C18:0 CE

C16:0 CE

C18:1 CE

C20:2 CE

C18:2 CE a-glucose

= positive correlation

= negative correlation phenylalanine phenylalanine

C18:1 LPC

PlasPre_2 leucine

A1I3_4 TT_2 phenylalanine

ApoA1_7 b-glucose b-glucose

TT_1

FG

ApoA1_3

C20:4 LPC

LD

A2GC

= higher in treated g roup

= lower i n treated g roup

Clish, C. B.; Davidov, E.; Oresic, M.; Plasterer, T.; Lavine, G.; Londo, T. R.; Meys, M.; Snell, P.; Stochaj, W.; Adourian, A.;

Zhang, X.; Morel, N.; Neumann, E.; Verheij, E.; Vogels, J, T.W.E.; Havekes, L. M.; Afeyan, N.; Regnier, F. E.; Greef, J.;

Naylor, S. Omics: A Journal of Integrative Biology 2004, 8, 3-13.

SysNet: Interactive Visual Data

Mining of Molecular Correlation

Network

An interactive integration and visualization environment for molecular correlation of ‘omics data.

•Integrating molecular expression information generated in different ‘omics

•Visualizing molecular correlation in interactive mode

•Enabling time course data visualization and analysis

•Automatically organizing molecules based on their expression pattern in time course.

Zhang, M.; Ouyang, Q.; Stephenson, A.; Salt, D.; Kane, D. M.; Burgner J.; Buck, C. and Zhang, X. BMC

Systems Biology. Accepted by BMC Systems Biology.

a) b)

Biomarker Verification

Wet-lab verification

AQUA

MRM

 Antibody

In-silico verification

 tracing lineage

 pathway analysis

Automated Lineage Tracing

•Interested in identifying the connections between input and output data for a program

•Tracing of fine-grained lineage through run-time analysis

•Developed based on dynamic slicing techniques used in debugging

• Applicable to any arbitrary function

Zhang, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.

and Prabhakar, S. 33rd International

Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2007), 2007.

Summary

• Informatics platform developed in my group can be used to analyze protein and metabolite profiling data to differentiate disease and normal samples for biomarker discovery

• Groups identified using clustering analysis reflected the phenotypic categories of cancer and control samples, the animal and human subjects, etc. with high degree of accuracy

• The application of SysNet using an interactive visual data mining approach integrates omics data into a single environment, which enables biologists performing data mining

• Lineage tracing technology is an efficient and effective approach for in-silico biomarker verification. This technique will significantly reduce the false discovery rate (FDR) of biomarker discovery

Acknowledgements

Irina Fedulova

Dr. Hamid Mirzaei

Dr. Cheolhwan Oh

Sergey E. Pevtsov

Ouyang Qi

Alan Stephenson

Mingwu Zhang

Dr. John Burger

Dr. Michael D. Kane

Dr. Fred E. Regnier

Dr. David Salt

Dr. Mohammad Sulma

Dr. Daniel Raftery

Dr. Sunil Prabhakar

Dr. David Clemmer

Dr. John Asara

Dr. Mu Wang

Dr. Jake Chen

Dr. Steve Valentine

Dr. Steve Naylor

Postdoc Positions

Posting Title: Industrial Postdoctoral Fellow - Bioinformatician

Work Location: University of Louisville, KY

Job Type: Full time

Starting Date: Position immediately available

Job Description: Predictive Physiology and Medicine (PPM) Inc. is an exciting health and life sciences company based in Bloomington, Indiana focused on developing analytical systems for the individualized health and wellness industry.

We have an immediate opening for a postdoctoral fellow. The successful candidate will develop bioinformatics systems for mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics and metabolomics.

Requirements: The position requires a bioinformatician with strong computational background. Priority will be given to the candidate with a PhD in bioinformatics, computer science, statistics, engineer, or computational physics.

The successful candidate should have strong understanding of statistics and pattern recognition. Programming skills using Matlab, Microsoft .NET, or Java to accomplish analyses is required. Experience in analyzing biological data is not required; however, interest in multidisciplinary research is a must.

Download