CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES
CHANCELLOR’S OFFICE
RFA MeetUp
December 14, 2012
1
Administrative
Fixes
Empower Regions
Rethink Funding
• Phase 1: Doing What MATTERS for Jobs & Economy Framework
– Target incentive investment (EWD, SB70, Perkins 1B)
• Sector
• Region
• Technical Assistance
– Braided RFA
– Common accountability metrics
• Phase 2: Moving the Needle
• Phase 3: Scaling Excellence
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
2
Administrative
Fixes
Empower Regions
Rethink Funding
Perkins 1B =/ Perkins 1C
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
3
Questions from 12.7.12
• I think the macro regions on this slide are wrong. A,B, & G the double regions and C,D,E & F are single
regions. Slide shows regions A,B, & G receiving $150K - $70K These are the double regions (NFN, BAY, LA/OC,
funding should be at $300K, not $150K
• Will the RFA released as a draft document for comment prior to the final official release?
• Is it accurate to say that the Sector Navigators will primarily focus on Regions that have selected the strand
as a “P” or “E”?
• If the consortia does not agree/select on a specific sector for “P” and “E”, will a college not be allowed to
apply for EWD Center funding in that sector?
• As documents under DWM website are modified, have you determined a way to indicate when a document
has changed?
• What is the CCCCO Extended Operations Team?
• Has there been extended discussion with EDD on sharing data cohorts? This will be critical for evaluation.
• In previous years, EWD Centers were able to request an extension of their funding into the next fiscal year.
Will they still be able to do that and will Centers be able to request an extension of 2012-2013 funds?
• If we have a program not selected by our region as Sector, can we benefit from the curricular work being
done in a different region?
• Must Sector Navigators be housed in a region that has chosen that Sector?
• Outside of the 10 Sectors, can we apply to charter a collaborative community so that we can upgrade our
curriculum or undertake a project-in-common?
• How can I better position for SB 1070 funds coming out in the 3rd round?
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
4
Recap
• 12+ months of conversations with internal and external
stakeholders
• First set of RFAs release within 30 days…
– RFAs for Key Talent:
• Sector Navigators statewide consolidated package ($372,500 each): Sector
Navigator, Hub, Collaborative Communities, Advisories
• Consortia Chair packages:
– Macro-regions A, B, G: $300K + $70K
– Macro-regions C, D, E, F: $150K + $70K
CORRECTED
– Selected TA Provider RFAs:
• Labor market information
• Contract education
• CACareerCafe.com toolkits
• EWD coordination
• Administration of ‘supplemental Collaborative Communities’
• Future RFAs: Upon resolving dependencies
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
5
Questions from 12.7.12
• Regarding the 3 Priority and 2 Emerging Sectors restriction for each region – is there data that shows each
region is the same in terms of economic/population/industrial demographics. Can you share this date so we
can see how “5” was determined as appropriate for each region? Seems like a one size fits all approach –
seeing the data will help understand.
• The 15 Economic Regions for California – what is the source of the designation? Are they used by other
agencies in the state?
• Can you tell me what external stakeholders have been involved in the process? Specifically what companies
have provided input to date?
• Is there still time to make a case for ICT to be elevated form Emerging to Priority in LA/OC: Bases on number of
jobs and higher revenue and wages.
• What happens when a consortia doesn’t consult other regional partners in determining sectors?
• It is amazing to me that Hospitality and Tourism was not included in the San Diego Region as it is the 3rd largest
industry Sector and is identified by both the EDC and the Workforce Partnership as a priority, but not by
colleges.
• Is there an example of a region working together?
• Are you going to continue to go forward with having Consortia pursue Joint Power Authority?
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
6
12+ months of listening and discussion Constituencies
•
Statewide need of regions: ‘Skilled workers by sectors’
– Becky Morgan, California Economic Summit & California Forward
•
Retraining economy: workers need multiple on- and off-ramps to skill, reskill, and up skill.
– Tim Rainey, California Workforce Investment Board, Formerly California Labor Federation
•
Lack of capacity to respond creates an access problem: no training, no job.
– SEIU-UHW Innovate What Matters Allied Health Project
•
Some policies that originated for the purpose of transfer do not work for the workforce
mission.
– IHELP Nancy Shulock
•
EWD and SB70 reauthorization pledged administrative changes.
– Legislature & Staff, Legislative Analyst Office, Department of Finance
•
Trust by employers takes time, while tenure of college CEOs is shortening.
– Dianne Van Hook, Chancellor, Santa Clarita District
•
Likely themes in federal funding shifts: consortia, competition, sectors, regions, pathways,
outcomes, authentic partnerships.
– Andy Van Kleunen, National Skills Coalition
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
7
12+ months of listening and discussion ‘Extended Leadership Team’
Linda Zorn
Jim Caldwell
Linda Collins
Rich Della Valle
David Gatewood
June Bayha
John Means
Cris McCullough
Rock Pfotenhauer
Greg Thomas
Omid Pourzanjani
Debra Jones
Lyla Eddington
Mike Roessler
Van Ton-Quinlivan
Elaine Gaertner
Catherine Swenson
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
8
12+ months of listening and discussion –
Consortia Leaders, Initiative Directors, CCCCO Staff
Perkins Regional Consortia Leaders
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Rock Pfotenhauer
Kitty O’Doherty
Linda Zorn
Tessa Miley
Jim Anderson
Lou Anne Walden
Sue Clark
Stan Shroeder
Michelle Turner
Joyce Johnson
Julie Pekhonan
Lyla Eddington
Susan Coleman
EWD Initiative Directors
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Jose Anaya, Advanced Manufacturing
Peter Davis, Adv Transportation & Renewables
Elaine Gaertner, Centers of Excellence
Jeffrey O’Neil, Life Sciences/Biotech
Mike Roessler, Small Business
Catherine Swenson, Training & Development
Bruce Whistler, Work-based Resource Ctr
Jeff Williamson, Global Trade & Logistics
Steve Wright, Interactive Mobile Applications
Linda Zorn, Health
CCCCO Staff
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
9
12+ months of listening and discussion –
EDPAC, CWIB State Leadership, CCCAOE Leadership
EDPAC/WEDPAC
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
10 sector reps
1 labor
1 philanthropy
1 CWIB to represent state agencies
1 economic development
7 community college CEOs from each macroregion
1 classified rep
2 faculty
•
1 ASCCC faculty rep
•
1 CTE faculty
1 CCCAOE
2 BoG
1 student rep
1 CIO/CBO
2 CCCCO
CCCAOE Leadership
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sidney Burks, Chaffey College
Carol Coen, SJ Evergreen CCD
Jeff Cummings, College of the Sequoias
Corinne Doughty, Santiago Canyon College
Lyla Eddington, Rio Hondo College
Carole Goldsmith, W. Hills CCD
Richard Ida, Sacramento City College
Eva Jimenez, Shasta College
Joyce Johnson, Mr. San Jacinto College
John Means, Kern CCD
Wheeler North, SD Miramar College
Beth Pratt, Napa Valley College
Omid Pourzanjani, Golden West College
Kim Schenk, Diablo Valley College
Julius Sokenu, Moorpark College
Mollie Smith, Palomar College
•
•
•
•
Employment Development Department (EDD)
Employment Training Panel (ETP)
Health & Human Services (HHS)
Labor & Workforce Development Agency (Labor)
CWIB State Leadership
•
•
•
•
•
CA Workforce Investment Board (CWIB)
CA Community Colleges (CCCCO)
CA Department of Education (CDE)
CA Energy Commission (CEC)
Division of Apprenticeship Standards (DAS)
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
10
12+ months of listening and discussion –
Critical Conversations in the field w/ ASCCC
Date / Time
8/21/2012
9/6/2012
9/13/2012
9/14/2012
9/18/2012
9/20/2012
9/24/2012
9/25/2012
10/10/2012
10/18/2012
11/1/2012
11/2/2012
11/20/2012
TBD December
Region(s)
Los Angeles
Santa Cruz & Monterey
Los Angeles
Inland Empire
East Bay
Central Valley & Mother Lode
Greater Sacramento
Orange County
Orange County
Greater Sacramento, Northern Inland, Greater Coastal
San Diego/Imperial
Silicon Valley, SF & Peninsula
Central Valley
North Bay Community Colleges/WIB Meeting
Host
Los Angeles Community College District
Hartnell College
Mt. San Antonio College
Inland Empire Consortium
Contra Costa Community College District
Central Valley Consortium
North Far North Consortia
Coast CCD
Santa Ana College
North Far North Consortia
Southwestern Community College District
Foothill College and Canada College
State Center Consortium
College of Marin Indian Valley Campus in Novato
“We are still buzzing from the energy around that day!” Judy Miner, President, Foothill College
“I think we all sense the timeliness, even urgency, to these conversations.” Ron Taylor, Superintendent/President, Merced College
“Engaging in the Critical Conversation about Doing What MATTERS for Jobs and the Economy was extremely valuable. It really energized me
to be surrounded by such a dedicated and creative group of people who have clear, focused goals and know how to work together.”
Dennis Gervin, President, Columbia College
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
11
12+ months of listening and discussion Constituencies
•
California Chamber of Commerce
•
eUpdates, eAlerts
•
Asian Chamber of Commerce
•
Public comment via web, twitter
•
California Manufacturer’s Trade Association
(CMTA)
•
California Energy & Utility Consortia
•
National Association of Manufacturers
•
Center for Energy Workforce Development
•
California Hospital Association
•
U.S. Department of Agriculture
•
Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce
•
California Competes
•
FACCC
•
Campaign for College Opportunities
•
California Regional Occupational Programs
•
Community College League of California
•
California Community College Trustees
•
California Community College Board of Governors
Doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
12
Recap
Consolidation of regional submissions
Health
Advanced
Manufacturing
Agriculture,
Water, &
Environmental
Tech
P
P
P
E
E
E
P
P
P
Life Sciences/
Biotech
ICT/
Digital Media
Retail/
Hospitality/
Tourism
'Learn and
Earn'
Advanced
Transportation &
Renewables
Energy
(Efficiency) &
Utilities
Small Business
Global Trade &
Logistics
North/Far North
Greater Sacto
Northern Coastal
Northern Inland
E
E
E
P
P
P
Bay/Interior Bay
SF/San Mateo
East Bay
Silicon Valley
North Bay
SC/Monterey
P
P
P
E
P
E
E
E
P
E
P
P
P
E
P
E
P
P
P
E
P
P
P
P
E
E
P
P
E
P
E
Central
Central Valley
Mother Lode
P
E
P
E
LA County
Orange County
P
P
P
San Diego/Imperial
P
E
Desert/Inland Empire
P
P
South Central
P
P
P
E
E
P
LA/OC
P
E
P
E
P
E
E
E
E
E
P
P
Key:
P = Priority sector
E = Emergent sector
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
13
Recap
Lessons Learned
• For 2014-15: Time process for earlier
– CoE to modify top 10 sector categories by May
– Consortia revisits prioritization during summer
– Submission in September
• Effective practice - include LWIBS/EDCs in prioritization
• Never enough resources. Aim to be equitable
– Similar funding pool for similar sized macro-regions
– Differentiate between Priority vs. Emergent funding
– SB 1070 will go away by end of 2015, unless new funds founds
• Grants fund capacity
– Long term = annual but potential for 2-5 years
– Short term = annual but performed in 1-2 years
– Spot = less than 12 months
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
Common Metrics & Accountability
More on outcomes,
less on activities and outputs
Common menu
Selectively applies depending on
funding stream & RFA scope
Advised by CalPASS, RP Group,
WestEd, CCCCO TRIS, ARCC 2.0, field
Launchboard: tools to automate data
collection and deliver data
SB 1402
SB 1070
Perkins 1B
A. Student Momentum Points
B. Leading Indicators of
Curriculum Alignment to
Workforce Needs
C. Quality of Service Measures
“Moving the Needle”
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
15
Work in
progress
A. Student Momentum Points
SB 1402
• Middle School cluster
• Transition from Middle School to
High School cluster
• High School cluster
• Transition from High School to
College cluster
• Community College cluster
• General Education and Transfer
Progress cluster
• Community College Transition to
Workforce cluster
• Workforce Progress cluster
SB 1070
X
Perkins 1B
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
16
B. Leading Indicators
of Curriculum Alignment
Occurrences of the following:
• Alignment of skillsets within a program
(or set of courses) to the needs of the
industry in a particular occupation and
the needs of the labor market
• Regionalization of stackable
certificates aligned with a particular
occupation ladder
• Alignment of a certificate with state-,
industry-, nationally-, and/or
employer-recognized certificate
• Movement of a certificate from noncredit to credit
• Curriculum articulation along a career
or multi-career educational pathway
• Updating skills of faculty, teachers,
counselors, and/or ‘supporting staff to
student’ to reflect labor market needs
Work in
progress
SB 1402
SB 1070
Perkins 1B
X
X
X
For each, grantees shall provide evidence in the form
of a rating by the employers/advisory body,
on a scale of 0-5.
5 = exceeds expectation
4 = meets expectation
3 = almost meets expectation
2 = below expectation
1 = does not meet expectation
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
17
Work in
progress
C. Quality of Service Measures
• 360-degree evaluation,
with consideration for…
– Strength of leadership and
coordination in building of necessary
supporting capacity, such as center,
advisories, collaborative communities,
and hub
– Strength of partnership with
education and industry partners
– Strength of awareness and influence
on state and regional policy related
issues
– Leadership and responsiveness as a
member of the CCCCO Extended
Operations Team
SB 1402
SB 1070
X
Perkins 1B
X
Tool will be provided by the CCCCO.
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
18
Future RFA MeetUps
• For instructions to MeetUp:
http://doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu/Portals/6/docs/e
Alert%20-%20RFA%20Meet%20Ups.pdf
– Friday, 01/11/12, 12:00pm - 1:00pm
– Friday, 01/18/12, 12:00pm - 1:00pm
– Friday, 01/25/12, 12:00pm - 1:00pm
• Follow us on Twitter:
–
–
OmidOnEducation
WorkforceVan
California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students
19