4 November 2014
Dr Duncan Banks, Chair, Open University
Human Research Ethics Committee
Copy of talk at: http://tinyurl.com/pxh7uxb

ˮ
The Open University is committed to maintaining standards of professional conduct in all research activities and central to the principles that guide research is that it must be conducted in accordance with the highest contemporary ethics standards.
ˮ
2

To ensure this OU research ethics support includes the:
• H uman R esearch E thics C ommittee (HREC)
• R esearch E thics R eference G roup (RERG)
• A nimal W elfare and E thical R eview B ody (AWERB)
More information on how each can offer support and guidance for your research is available from the Research Ethics website including information on research ethics approval processes and frequently asked questions.
3

• Brief history of development of research ethics
• Ethics principles
• Research benefits, risks and constituencies
• The OU HREC structure and process
• Initial checklist, Important areas to include and
Protocols
• Updated Research Ethics Advice
• When things go wrong
• Discussion

• 113. If a physician make a large incision with an operating knife and cure it, or if he open a tumour (over the eye) with an operating knife, and saves the eye, he shall receive ten shekels in money.
• 115. If a physician make a large incision with the operating knife, and kill him, or open a tumour with the operating knife, and cut out the eye, his hands shall be cut off.

I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion....
Into whatever houses I enter, I will go into them for the benefit of the sick, and will abstain from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption ...
Whatever, in connection with my professional service, or not in connection with it, I see or hear, in the life of men, which ought not to be spoken of abroad, I will not divulge, as reckoning that all such should be kept secret.

• There must be recognition of an area where experimentation in man is needed.
• Some experimental studies in man are justifiable when the information cannot otherwise be obtained.
• The investigator must be conscientious and responsible ... for a well considered, methodological approach is required so that as much information as possible will be obtained whenever a human subject is used. No random studies are to be made.
•
The voluntary consent of the subject is necessary.
• The experiment is to be discontinued when it causes distress to the subject.
• The project must be abandoned when the subject becomes dissatisfied.

• 5. Innovative therapy may be carried out only after the subject or his legal representative has unambiguously consented to the procedure in light of relevant information provided in advance. Where consent is refused, innovative therapy may be initiated only if it constitutes an urgent procedure to preserve life or prevent serious damage to health and prior consent could not be obtained under the circumstances.
• 7. Exploitation of social hardship in order to undertake innovative therapy is incompatible with the principles of medical ethics.

After WW2, in October 1946, the Nuremberg Medical Trial began, lasting until August of 1947. Twenty-three German physicians and scientists were accused of performing cruel and lethal medical experiments on concentration camp inmates and other living humans between 1933 and 1945.
Fifteen defendants were found guilty, and eight were acquitted.
Of the 15, seven were executed and eight were imprisoned.

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

• The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
• The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

“ In research on man, the interest of science and society should never take precedence over considerations related to the well-being of the subject .
”

• 1966 formation of first British REC
• 1978 British Psychological Society research ethics code
• 1991 Department of Health guidance for RECs
• 1999 Association of Research Ethics Committees
• 2000 Central Office for Research Ethics Committees
• 2001 European Union Directive 2001/20/EC
• 2004 UK Clinical Trials Regulations
• 2004 RESPECT framework - socio-economic research
• 2004 ESRC Research Ethics Framework
• 2007 National Research Ethics Service
• 2008 Integrated Research Application System (IRAS)

Code for European Social Science:
1. Upholding scientific standards
2. Compliance with the law
3. Avoidance of social and personal harm

Respect for the dignity of persons
1. Responsible caring
2. Integrity in relationships
3. Responsibility to society

The six key principles :
1. Research should be designed, reviewed and undertaken to ensure integrity, quality and transparency.
2. Research staff and participants must normally be informed fully about the purpose, methods and intended possible uses of the research, what their participation in the research entails and what risks, if any, are involved. Some variation is allowed in very specific research contexts.
3. The confidentiality of information supplied by research participants and the anonymity of respondents must be respected.
4. Research participants must take part voluntarily, free from any coercion.
5. Harm to research participants must be avoided in all instances.
6. The independence of research must be clear, and any conflicts of interest or partiality must be explicit.

•
Respect for the Autonomy and Dignity of Persons
•
Scientific Value
•
Social Responsibility
•
Maximising Benefit and Minimising Harm

Respect for the Autonomy and Dignity of Persons
Adherence to the concept of moral rights is an essential component of respect for the dignity of persons. Rights to privacy, self-determination, personal liberty and natural justice are of particular importance to psychologists, and they have a responsibility to protect and promote these rights in their research activities. As such, psychologists have a responsibility to develop and follow procedures for valid consent, confidentiality, anonymity, fair treatment and due process that are consistent with those rights.

Scientific Value
Research should be designed, reviewed and conducted in a way that ensures its quality, integrity and contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding. Research that is judged within a research community to be poorly designed or conducted wastes resources and devalues the contribution of the participants. At worst it can lead to misleading information being promulgated and can have the potential to cause harm.

Social Responsibility
The discipline of psychology, both as a science and a profession, exists within the context of human society. Accordingly, a shared collective duty for the welfare of human and non-human beings, both within the societies in which psychology researchers live and work, and beyond them, must be acknowledged by those conducting the research.

Maximising Benefit and Minimising Harm
… psychologists should consider all research from the standpoint of the research participants, with the aim of avoiding potential risks to psychological well-being, mental health, personal values, or dignity.

• physical trauma/injury?
• distress?
• offence?
• breach of confidentiality?
• inconvenience?
• coercion?
• waste of time?
• waste of resources / funds?
• disrepute or litigation?
• failure to publish

• research as intrinsic good?
• contribution to knowledge?
• development of theories?
• improvements to lives?
• training researchers?
• career advancement?
• enhancing reputation/image?
• increasing commercial success?
• entertainment and enjoyment?

• participants
• researchers
• institutions
• sponsors / funding bodies
• society

RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Affiliated Research
Centres Management
Group (ARCMG)
Research Degrees
Committee (RDC)
Research Degree
Examination Results
Ratification Sub
Committee (RRAT)
MRes Award Board
(MRes AB)
Human Research
Ethics Committee
(HREC)
Life & Biomolecular
Sciences Management
Group (LBSMG)
Theology and
Religious Studies
Management Group
(TRS)
Indicates governance reporting line
Indicates advisory/management reporting line
MRes Management
Group (MRes MG)
Innovation &
Enterprise Advisory
Group (IEAG)
Research Careers
Working Group
(RCWG)
Research Strategy
Advisory Group
(RSAG)

•
All persons carrying out research with a contract of employment with The Open University – ethics review and approval role
•
Taught undergraduate and postgraduate students of The
Open University and students in ARCs and sponsoring establishments – advisory and review role
•
The Open University research community – education and policy development role
•
National HEI research community – research ethics environment scanning and contributions to national developments

Membership
1.
Four external members appointed by the Pro-Vice-Chancellor
(Research & Enterprise), to include: a medical practitioner, a researcher from a research institution other than the Open
University, a lay person and a representative from a corporate body
2.
The chair of the Research Committee ex officio, or nominee
3.
Two members nominated by the Research Committee
4.
Up to seven members co-opted by the committee so as to cover any aspect, professional, scientific or ethical, of a research proposal which lies beyond the expertise of existing members

•
Extensive intranet and WWW support site
•
Informal advice and support
•
Workshops, training and induction sessions
•
Responsive ethics review and approval system:
– pre-review scan and advice
– electronic submission using AMS
– scrutiny panel, 3 HREC members, inc. external
– 15 day maximum turnaround

http://www.open.ac.uk/research/ethics/index.shtml

http://www.open.ac.uk/research/main/our-research/research-strategy-and-policies
Go to the bottom of this page for the CoP

http://www.open.ac.uk/research/ethics/human-FAQs.shtml

Q1. Do I need ethics approval for my research?
Q2. How do I apply for ethical approval?
Q3. Are you conducting research in the NHS?
Q4. I want to gather data from OU students. Do I apply to the Human
Research Ethics Committee (HREC)?
Q5. Which guidelines should I follow?
Q6. What is a 'protocol'?
Q7. What is data protection?
Q8. I am submitting an application for a grant for a project collecting data from human participants. Do I need ethical approval?
Q9. Why 'participant' and not 'subject'?
Q10. What is DBS and do I need it?
Q11. I want to run a Web survey. Does it need ethical clearance?
Q12. Are payments made to Research volunteers defined as 'earnings'?
Q13. Is my research covered by OU insurance?
Q14. How do I obtain consent
Q15. Are generic protocols and templates available?

• Review and approval of proposed research projects by HREC are undertaken through a virtual process of emails but may also include telephone discussions or face-to-face meetings.
• HREC applications can be stand alone for projects that are OU funded or linked to an externally funded bid/project.

see hand-out
1. Does the study involve participants who are particularly vulnerable or unable to give informed consent? (e.g. children, people with learning disabilities)
2. Will the study require the co-operation of a gatekeeper for initial access to the groups or individuals to be recruited? (e.g. students at school, members of a self-help group, residents of nursing home)
3. Will it be necessary for participants to take part in the study without their knowledge and consent at the time? (e.g. covert observation of people in non-public places)
4. Will the study involve discussion of sensitive topics (e.g. sexual activity, drug use)?
5. Are drugs, placebos or other substances (e.g. food substances, vitamins) to be administered to the study participants or will the study involve invasive, intrusive or potentially harmful procedure of any kinds?

see hand-out
6. Is pain or more than mild discomfort likely to result from the study?
7. Could the study induce psychological stress or anxiety or cause harm or negative consequences beyond the risks encountered in normal life?
8. Will the study involve prolonged or repetitive testing?
9. Will financial inducements (other than reasonable expenses and compensation for time) be offered to participants?
10.Will the study involve recruitment of patients or staff through the
NHS or the use of NHS data?
11.Will the study involve the collection of human tissue or other human biological samples?

see hand-out
• Project: a short, descriptive title.
• Project SharePoint Link : (intranet – requires VPN)
• Description: a summary of the main points of the research, written in terms easily understandable by a non-specialist and containing no technical terms.
• Investigators : Give names and institutional attachments of all persons involved in the collection and handling of individual data. Name one person as Principal
Investigator (PI). Research students should ask their primary supervisor to endorse their application quoting the HREC reference number assigned to them . Research students should normally name themselves as Principal
Investigator.

• Literature review: Provide an indicative brief review of the existing literature or previous research. Clarify whether the proposed study replicates prior work
AND/OR duplicates work done elsewhere AND/OR has an element of originality.
• Methodology: Outline the method(s) that will be employed to collect and analyse data.
• Participants: Give details of the population targeted or from which you will be sampling and how this sampling will be done. Give information on the diversity of the sample.

• Recruitment procedures: Give details of how potential participants will be identified and approached.
• Consent: Give details of how valid consent will be sought and attach copies of information sheet(s) and consent form(s) if applicable. Give details and a timeframe of how participants can withdraw consent and what will happen to their data in such a case (see the Research Ethics website for a guidance document).
• Location(s) of data collection: Give details of where and when data will be collected. If on private, corporate or institutional premises, indicate what approvals are gained/required. Explain why the research needs to be conducted in the chosen setting or location.

• Schedule: Time frame for the research and its data collection phase(s).
• Published ethics and legal guidelines to be followed:
Detail which guidelines will be followed by the researchers. Examples:-
British Educational Research Association (BERA)
British Psychological Society (BPS)
British Sociological Association (BSA)
Social Research Association (SRA)
Market Research Society (MRS)
Social Policy Association (SPA)
UK Evaluation Society (UKES)

• Data Protection: Give details of registration of the project under the DP Act and the procedures and schedule
(including dates) to be followed re: storage and disposal of data to comply with the Act. Any requirements by the funding body should also be given. Indicate the earliest and latest date for the destruction of original data if that is required – or any archiving arrangements that have been agreed/permitted/required. Ensure this is also indicated in the project schedule.

• Protecting the privacy of the individual in relation to their personal information.
• Ensuring the reliability of any information used and its fair and legitimate use by everyone.
Legal penalties may arise if personal data is not looked after properly.
Any stored personal data is covered by the Data Protection
Act (1998) and if you gather such data in connection with your research whilst at the OU, you will need to register your project with the OU Data Protection Office, Data-
Protection@open.ac.uk.

It is good practice to separate collected data from personal identity information as soon as possible after collection and to use codes to identify individual cases if necessary. The key linking such codes to identity information such as names, addresses and telephone numbers should be kept secure and separate from the dataset, accessible only to a strictly limited number of project staff.

• Recompense to participants: normally, recompense is only given for expenses and inconvenience, otherwise it might be seen as coercion/inducement to participate.
Give details of any recompense to participants.
• Deception: give details of the withholding of any information from participants, or misrepresentation or other deception that is an integral part of the research.
Any such deception should be fully justified.

• Risk of harm to participants: Detail any foreseen risks to participants or researchers (e.g. home visits) and, based on a risk assessment, the steps that will be taken to minimise/counter these. If the proposed study involves contact with children or other vulnerable groups, please confirm that the requirements of the DBS for each person involved in these contacts have been complied with.
• Debriefing: give details of how information will be given to participants after data collection to inform them of the outcomes of their participation and the research more broadly.

• Related risks: indicate how research risks are to be limited by anticipating potential problems.
• Benefits and knowledge transfer: state how the research may be of general benefit to participants and society in general.
• Declaration: declare here that the research will conform to the above protocol and that any significant changes or new ethics issues will be raised with the HREC before they are implemented.
• Public Disclosure of Ethics Application : In order to conform with OU governance guidelines, brief information on OU research approved by the HREC will be added to the Research Ethics website.

•
What happens if I carry out research on participants without HREC approval?
•
What if I lose sensitive data?
•
What if someone wants to withdraw from the study after I have anonymised the data?
•
What happens if the risks of the research increase due to circumstances out of my control?
•
I have recorded conversations without consent.
•
I have used photographs of individuals or their names in publications without their consent.

• British Educational Research Association
• British Psychological Society
• British Sociological Association
• British Society of Criminology
• ESRC Framework for Research Ethics (FRE)
• Medical Research Council
55

Research Ethics Home Page http://www.open.ac.uk/research/ethics/index.shtml
Research Ethics – Human participants http://www.open.ac.uk/research/ethics/human.shtml
Research Ethics – Animal use http://www.open.ac.uk/research/ethics/animal.shtml
Data protection FAQ http://www.open.ac.uk/research/ethics/FAQs.shtml#p6
Student Research Project Panel FAQ http://www.open.ac.uk/research/ethics/FAQs.shtml#p3
56

Copy of talk at: http://tinyurl.com/pxh7uxb

The SRPP ensures that Open University enquirers, students or graduates are not asked to participate in institutional research that does not meet University Guidelines. All projects which involve the collection of data from samples of
OU enquirers, students or graduates need to apply to SRPP for authorisation.
You may need to get clearance from SRPP before applying for ethical approval.
Details of how to apply to SRPP can be found via the OU
Research Ethics website