September Policy Analysis on Ethiopia Interest Free Banking (IFB) Directive By Zaineb Sefiani Prepared for Mercy Corps 14 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I - DIAGNOSIS 5 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE REVIEW OF CURRENT POLICY LEGAL FRAMEWORK WHY SHOULD NBE REVISE THE EXISTING IFB DIRECTIVE? 5 6 6 10 II - ANALYSIS 12 III - RECOMMENDATIONS AND COURSE OF ACTION 18 IV – IMPLEMENTATION 21 APPENDIX 22 APPENDIX 1: BENCHMARK OF RELEVANT COUNTRIES 22 1.1 PAKISTAN 22 1.2 SOUTH AFRICA 23 1.3 KENYA 24 1.4 EGYPT 25 1.5 SUDAN 27 1.6 INDONESIA 28 1.7 OMAN 29 APPENDIX 2: INTERNATIONAL REGULATING BODIES 30 2.1 INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES BOARD (IFSB) 30 2.2 ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ORGANIZATION FOR ISLAMIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS (AAOIFI)31 APPENDIX 3: SAMPLE OF IFB CURRICULUM FOR BUILDING CAPACITY OF TRAINERS IN ETHIOPIA 32 APPENDIX 4: ZAKAT 33 2 List of Acronyms AAOIFI ADIBE AGFUND BCO BMI CIDA CIMA CISI CBO FNB GCC IFB IFSB IIF IRB MCMO NBE OIB PRIME SSB UB UNICEF USAID VAT Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic financial Institutions Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank Egypt Arab Gulf Programme for Development Banking Companies Ordinance Bank Muamalat Indonesia Canadian International Development Agency Chartered Institute for Management Accountants Chartered Institute for Securities and Investments Central Bank of Oman First National Bank Gulf Cooperation Council Interest Free Banking Islamic Financial Services Board Innovation and Investment Fund Islamic Rural Banks Mudaraba Companies and Mudarabas Ordinance National Bank of Ethiopia Oromia International Bank Pastoralist Areas Resilience Improvement through Market Expansion Sharia Supervisory Board United Bank United Nations Children's Fund US Agency for International Development Value Added Tax 3 Executive summary In 2013, the World Bank estimated Ethiopia’s total population at 94.1 million 1 of which 35% to 40% are Muslims. Up until 2011, no banking products were available to service the Muslim community. Although the National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) has launched an Interest Free Banking (IFB) directive, there is still a need to develop an adequate legal framework to effectively grow and capitalise on a prosperous IFB sector. The central premise of this paper is to identify the gaps and challenges of the current directive. Out in-depth diagnosis shows that despite efforts to develop the IFB offering, the lack of an adequate legal framework, the scarcity of skilled Islamic banking professionals and the limited awareness of Islamic finance products have been hindering progress in this field. To address these problems, the NBE has rolled out an initial basic directive for IFB. Mercy Corps has sponsored three capacity building initiatives in Ethiopia, Sudan and the UAE and no actions have been undertaken to increase the public’s awareness of IFB products. The objective of this paper is to recommend strategies for: 1. Strengthening the existing directive by suggesting a clear set of products and services that IFB windows could offer with a particular emphasis on using internationally recognised standards 2. Defining a training plan to develop skills amongst bankers, lawyers, and other professionals 3. Increasing awareness of IFB through marketing campaigns The application of these recommendations will lead to capturing a large part of the population especially in the untapped pastoralist areas, which are predominantly Muslim communities. 1 Source World Bank (http://data.worldbank.org/) 4 I - Diagnosis Statement of purpose Pastoralist Areas Resilience Improvement through Market Expansion (PRIME) is a fiveyear, $52 million USAID-funded initiative designed to support resilience among pastoralist communities in Ethiopia. One part of the intervention areas of PRIME’s Innovation and Investment Fund (IIF) is to support Financial Institutions through technical assistance or grants. As part of this program, PRIME has been working closely with the NBE and key industry stakeholders to promote IFB, to build capacity of local financial institutions in order to increase the volume of transactions, and to improve access to finance for businesses. PRIME’s main areas of focus include: 1. Supporting NBE to improve the legislative framework for IFB 2. Building the capacity of NBE and other stakeholders along with raising public awareness 3. Facilitating opportunities for increased investment In 2008, the Ethiopian Banking Business Proclamation (592/2008) was amended to include a provision for IFB. In 2011, the NBE issued a directive to authorise the business of IFB (SSB/51/2011). However, there has been no concrete work conducted for a proper roll out of these products. Currently, the directive is very broad and does not provide any specificity in terms of product lines, rules and regulations to ensure that the products developed by financial institutions are truly in line with Sharia law. Hence, a review of current policy is needed to provide viable alternatives to roll out IFB in Ethiopia. This report will provide an analysis of the current IFB directive (Directive Number SBB/51/2011). The analysis will also examine other factors, which are outside the legal framework that need to be taken into consideration for the effective development of IFB activities in Ethiopia. 5 Review of current policy In order to have a comprehensive understanding of the situation surrounding the current IFB directive the analysis will include: 1. An assessment of the legal framework of IFB windows 2. An understanding of the level of knowledge and skills among Ethiopian banking industry professional 3. An evaluation of the level of public awareness of IFB products within the Ethiopian market Legal framework The current directive for IFB (SSB/51/2011) is a 3-page document and includes the following points: 1. Only IFB windows are permitted, no fully-fledged interest free banks will be authorised 2. IFB entities need to follow Sharia law 3. IFB windows need to follow the same regulations as the other banks except on the interest rate, which does not apply The directive is relatively simple thus leaving a lot of flexibility to the banks offering IFB products. Given the high level of flexibility, there is no effective control, from a regulatory perspective, as to what the banks are licensed to offer for an IFB window. So far, three banks received licenses for IFB windows from NBE: 1. Oromia International Bank (OIB) 2. Commercial Bank of Ethiopia (CBE) 3. United Bank Legal framework – current practices within IFB windows Due to the inexistence of relevant legislation, each bank has adopted their own methodology, models and benchmarks for launching IFB products with little coherence or commonality in the market. There are two international regulatory bodies in the Islamic finance industry, which have been widely used as standard setting bodies and benchmarks for Islamic and IFB products: the Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) and International Financial Services Board (IFSB). Appendix 2, details the role of these institutions and how they have been adopted in other countries. In Ethiopia, OIB has opted to follow AAOIFI and both NBE and OIB have undertaken discussions with the IFSB on the possibility of implementing their standards at a national or institutional level. CBE looked into the UK, South African and Bahrain to develop their IFB product offering whereas, United Bank has based their products on Pakistan and 6 Saudi Arabia. The above shows that the directive seems to be simplistic and leaves too much room for offering products that may not be aligned with the actual Ethiopian needs. In their current state, IFB windows do not fully and effectively adhere to Islamic principles. Article 2.2 of the Ethiopian IFB directive states that IFB business “refers to banking business in which mobilizing or advancing funds is undertaken in a manner consistent with Islamic finance principles […]”. Hence, in order to achieve Sharia compliance, IFB windows need to have an extra layer of governance to ensure that the principles outlined in the latter article are met. In Ethiopia, NBE does not currently have internal experts to review and monitor IFB windows to make sure that they comply with article 2.2. On the institutional level, only OIB has opted for a Sharia Supervisory Board (SSB) model. The later is composed of 3 scholars two of whom have been drawn from the Ethiopian Islamic Affairs Supreme Council. In short, the Ethiopian Islamic Affairs Supreme Council has sound knowledge in Sharia law but lacks depth in financial expertise. So far CBE and United Bank have not sought any Islamic expert advice to develop their Interest Free product offerings, instead they have relied on Internet desk research. These banks do not currently have any Sharia board or Sharia advisors. Nevertheless, United Bank intends to have an advisory board for “Sharia compliance” that will be composed of financial advisers rather than Sharia scholars, as it prefers to distance itself from the Ethiopian Islamic Affairs Supreme Council, thus avoiding affiliation with a specific stream of Islamic viewpoints. In time, these measures may reveal that relying purely on Internet desk research along with independent financial advisers may conversely affect their decision-making aptitudes in regards to Islamic finance frameworks. The lack of regulatory framework on the Sharia compliance question means that the products are at high risk of not complying with authentic Islamic principles. Although, the access to Sharia expertise has been very limited, all 3 banks have already started offering Islamic financial products including current and savings accounts. Capacity building/Training (knowledge sharing) Skilled professionals are in short supply in the Islamic finance industry especially in Ethiopia. With IFB being relatively new, only a limited number of initiatives have been undertaken. Amongst these Mercy Corps has sponsored exposure trips to Sudan and the United Arab Emirates to help educate the industry players on IFB. There is a need for sustainable and continuous capacity building initiatives, which allows the on-going development of professionals in this sector. Capacity building is at the heart of the successful implementation and outreach of IFB products. Currently circa 400 branches offer IFB products. Assuming that at least 5 employees per branch need to have IFB 7 expertise, there is a demand for about 2,000-banking officers to have adequate IFB skills in the next 12 months. Internally, no training strategy and quality assurance exists. All 3 banks use the same training model. Senior management, who have gained knowledge through workshops and readings from the Internet, train staff at local branches. Furthermore, according to article 6.4 of the Ethiopian Licensing and Supervision of banking/insurance/micro financing business directive: A bank should “give training to directors at least once in a year on areas of financial analysis, corporate governance, applicable laws, regulations and directives, risk management and internal control.” And the bank “shall file certificate of training of directors with National Bank.” At the moment, there is no mention of IFB training for those banks with an IFB window or any reference to who should be allowed to deliver these courses (such as internationally accredited institutes or locally recognised training companies). Public awareness No awareness programs exist to reach out to the Muslim communities in Ethiopia. Prior to the launch of IFB, customers that did not want to receive interest on their savings would sign a waiver to the banks because of their religious beliefs. The fact that monies are deposited in accounts where clients waived their rights to receive interest does not mean that their deposits were now Sharia-compliant. Since there was nothing to state their funds were not used for financing projects on an interest basis and/or projects that contradict with Islamic principles. For instance, the bank may use these monies to provide loans on an interest basis for a project in the alcohol business. All three banks with IFB windows stated that clients who have signed the waiver for their conventional banking account have not yet asked the banks to switch their monies to an IFB saving accounts. There is no data that explains why this might be the case. The IFB windows believe that some clients may not be aware that these products exist. None of the banks have formally informed their clients of the existence of IFB. And none of the 3 IFB windows have undertaken any campaigns to drive awareness among their current or potential clients. 8 Oromia International Commercial Bank of Bank (OIB) Ethiopia (CBE) United Bank (UB) Branches 110 800 95 Branches with Interest Free banking Services 90 200 95 Number of Interest Free banking accounts 15,000 70,000* 1,000 Benchmark AAOIFI compliant Relying on AAOIFI Relying on internet and internet only Training Internal by own staff Internal by own staff Collateral More restricted as Same as conventional Same as conventional conventional products products products Technology Not decided yet Temenos Oracle flexcube Sharia Supervisory Board Yes (3 scholars) No No Current Product offering -Current accounts: Amanah - Saving accounts: Wadia - Export financing -Current accounts: Amanah - Saving accounts: Mudaraba - Current account: Wadia - Saving account Wadia - Mudaraba based investment products Expected Product offering Key challenges Internal by own staff - Training and capacity - Training and building capacity building - Public awareness - Public awareness - Tax/VAT - Land ownership - 20% equity cap - Zakat - Takaful - Training - Awareness - Reporting to NBE * Data to be confirmed Table: Data collected directly through interviews with the banks 9 Why should NBE revise the existing IFB directive? 1. Growing demand for IFB products: Given the sizable Muslim population in Ethiopia, there is a need for adequate banking products to serve this segment of the population. 2. Lack of benchmark and framework for IFB products: The current IFB directive does not refer to any benchmarks or frameworks that need to be adopted by financial institutions offering IFB products. The main concern is that the lack of convention for IFB products creates a risk that the products currently offered by IFB windows do not comply with Islamic principles. Therefore, there is a need to standardise the IFB activities and products offered in the Ethiopian market. 3. Lack of Sharia Supervisory board: Having an adequate Sharia Advisory board guarantees a product is compliant with Sharia principles. In Ethiopia, no directive, guidelines or authority supervises and authenticates the Sharia validity of an IFB product. The lack of authority leaves the consumer at risk of not being offered genuine Islamic financial products. Therefore there is a need to address how IFB products can be controlled at the product development stage but also monitored on a regular basis to ensure that they continuously comply with Sharia principles. 4. Issues with other legislations and directives: In some cases conventional legislations and directives are in direct conflict with prospective IFB products offerings. These conflicts may cause IFB products to be less competitive or in some cases make it impossible for IFB windows to launch certain IFB products unless revisions are made to cater for theses products. a. Ownership: According to Article 3 of business directive SBB/12/1996, “A bank may hold shares in a non-banking business only up to 20% of the company’s share capital and total holdings in such business shall not exceed 10%”. This article creates a conflict for issuing Musharaka or a Mudaraba partnership agreement in which a bank could own up to 100% of a business/transaction at the time of the signing of the contract. b. VAT on commodities: Commodity Murabaha transactions require that the bank buys and sells commodities for transactions. Intention behind the purchase of the commodity is not to own and use the commodity. Instead, the commodity is sold instantaneously in order to obtain cash. For instance an IFB saving account may offer returns based on the selling of commodities as an underlying asset transaction. In Ethiopia, the selling of commodities is subject to VAT. Hence if launched, these IFB saving products will be less competitive than conventional equivalent which would not be subject to VAT. 10 c. Double taxation: In a Murabaha transaction, a product or an asset is bought by the bank and sold back to the client at a mark-up price. This poses a double taxation issue for these products or assets. The above list is not exhaustive. There is a need to vet all the legislation and directives that are directly or indirectly related to IFB in order to come up with a full list conflicts that will arise when launching new product range for IFB. 5. Product line: Current legislation issues limit Sharia based products that are feasible to offer to Muslim population. 6. Manuals and procedures: IFB is relatively new, there is a need to ensure that the manual and procedure for implementing IFB products are designed in such a way that they really comply with Sharia principles. Having reviewed some of the manuals of existing IFB windows, there is a clear need for detailed vetting of these documents. 7. Capacity Building: Currently, capacity building is mainly done on an individual institution basis. The 3 banks have confirmed that the trainings are done internally by staff members that mainly consisted of self-study to develop the material presented to the branch level staff. The transfer of knowledge is currently limited to the individual interpretation by these banks. Moreover there is no certainty that the sources used for developing the internal training material are accurate and complete. Because of the lack of Islamic financial expertise in Ethiopia there might be a challenge to find adequate trainers with local knowledge and language skills. Capacity building initiatives, education and trainings in Ethiopia can be developed to ensure correct expertise and knowledge is disseminated into the Ethiopian financial market. 8. Awareness: In the previous section we have identified that there is a lack of awareness of IFB product among Muslim communities in Ethiopia. It is essential to reach out and educate the community about IFB product and also to explain that “IFB” does not mean, “free of charge”. From a balance sheet perspective an increase of IFB customer base on the deposit side means that the bank will have more funds available for financing IFB loans. 11 II - Analysis Following the analysis of the main gaps, issues and challenges of IFB in Ethiopia, this section presents viable options to the existing legal framework. We will be discussing the pros and cons of each proposed option. Legal framework The introduction of IFB in Ethiopia needs to be supported by adequate legal and regulatory framework. Overall, there are more or less two prototypes for IBF products, the Middle Eastern system and the South East Asian system, which frequently is labelled as the Malaysian system. From a legal perspective, the new policy can either follow the GCC model or the Malaysian model or have its own model. AAOIFI The Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Instituations (AAOIFI) was established in Bahrain in 1991 with the objective of providing standards for the Islamic finance industry. AAOIF protocols can be used as a support to issue standards for IFB. AAOIFI has 88 standards including 48 Sharia standards, 26 Accounting standards, 5 Auditing standards, 7 Governance standards and 2 Ethics standards. These standards could be used as a basis for putting together IFB policies in Ethiopia. AAOIFI has over 200 members in more than 40 countries. Members include regulatory and supervisory authorities, multilateral agencies, private sector entities, professional firms and industry associations. Examples of countries adopting AAOIFI include: Bahrain, UAE, Jordan, Lebanon, Qatar, Sudan and Syria. Examples of countries with guidelines based on AAOIFI include: Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, South Africa and United Kingdom. AAOIFI standards have introduced greater harmonisation among Islamic finance actors across the world. The advantage of rolling out AAOIFI-compliant products is that they in line with internationally recognized standards. The products launched have been approved, tested and accepted by the Muslim community. AAOIFI standards seamlessly blend with secular practices. No real disadvantage for complying with AAOIFI standards have been identified at this stage. Several central banks and monetary agencies from secular-based countries have heavily relied on AAOIFI standards to develop their IFB industry. NBE could also roll out IFB products based on the Malaysian model. This model is also derived from AAOIFI standards, however their products take a more lenient approach towards the interpretation of Sharia. Malaysia is one of the leading countries in Islamic banking and finance; the country has one of the most advanced Islamic banking systems in the world. The main disadvantage is that the products, which are approved in Malaysia, are not widely acceptable outside South East Asia. Using Malaysia as a model for 12 developing IFB products in Ethiopia could raise questions from the Ethiopian communities about whether these product are inherently Islamic. The last option is to come up with a new set of rules, which are specifically designed for the Ethiopian market. While this may have the advantage of customizing products to the needs of Ethiopia, it will entail a heavy workload, without guarantee on how well these products would be accepted. In this case, NBE could empower the banks by making them communicate appropriately to the consumer the products’ Sharia compliant features. This last model will also require a significant amount time and financing to conduct research and feasibility studies on the specific needs of Ethiopia. IFSB The International Financial Services Board (IFSB) was launched in 2002 and serves as an international standard setting body that provides prudential standards and guidelines for regulatory and supervisory agencies to ensure soundness and stability of the Islamic Financial industry including: retail banking, capital markets and Takaful (Islamic insurance). The IFSB has 13 standards, 5 guide notes, 1 technical note. As of September 2014, the IFSB comprises of 184 members from 41 jurisdictions, including 32 members from the African continent. IFSB has 55 regulatory and supervisory authorities, 8 international/intergovernmental organisations and 121 market players, professional firms and industry associations. (Source: IFSB) Several non-predominantly Muslim countries have adopted IFSB rulings including: China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Singapore and Thailand. IFSB Members from regulatory and supervisory authorities in Africa include: Djibouti: Banque Centrale de Djibouti Libya: Central bank of Libya Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius, Financial Services Commission Mauritius Morocco: Bank Al Maghrib Nigeria: Central bank of Nigeria, National Insurance Commission Senegal: Ministry of Economy and Finances Senegal, Banque Centrale Des Etats de L'Afrique de L'ouest Sudan: Central Bank of Sudan, Khartoum Stock Exchange Sudan, The Insurance Supervisory Authority Sudan Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia Zambia: Bank of Zambia IFSB Members from private sector, professional firms and industry associations in Africa include: 13 Egypt: Al Baraka Bank Egypt, Faisal Islamic Bank Kenya: Chase Bank (Kenya) Limited Nigeria: Ahmed Zakari & Co (Chartered Accountants), Lotus Capital Limited South Africa: Oasis Crescent Capital (PTY) Ltd. Sudan: Al Jazeera Sudanese Jordanian Bank, Al Salam Bank, Animal Resources Bank, Bank of Khartoum, Byblos Bank Africa Ltd, Faisal Islamic Bank, Farmer's Commercial Bank, Industrial Development Bank, Islamic Insurance Company, Omdurman National Bank, Shiekan Insurance and Reinsurance Co. Ltd, Sudan Financial Services Company, Sudanese French Bank, Tadamon Islamic Bank IFSB standards are fully compatible with AAOIFI standards and allow to further enhance the standardisation of the product offering. According to article 4 of Ethiopia IFB directive: a bank wishing to carry IFB will need to provide several documents including a “track record of adherence to prudential regulations, credit discipline, quality of customer services”. IFSB is the sole international regulatory body offering prudential standards for the Islamic banking industry. Adopting AAOIFI and IFSB provides several advantages: 1) IFB windows in Ethiopia can use models of products of existing institutions 2) Consumers can more easily understand products and evaluate their risks and returns 3) Potential for fewer disputes regarding a product being Sharia compliant 4) Favourable tax treatment of products which would have otherwise had a double taxation due to the nature of IFB products 5) Reduced risk of Sharia arbitrage Sharia Supervisory Boards or Sharia Advisory board Two elements should be considered for Sharia compliance: Board composition Nature of the regulatory framework around Sharia-compliance The Sharia Supervisory Board usually includes three or more Sharia scholars. The SSB issues informed legal opinions allowing institutions to provide financial services in a Sharia-compliant way by reviewing: 1) 2) 3) 4) Product concept description Market conditions Product development team’s views Product development team’s proposal and issue proper legal opinion (Fatwa) The advantage of a Sharia board is to have a religious expert opinion evaluating a products’ compliance with Sharia. Moreover, in case of disputes regarding the Sharia compliance of IFB product, the backing of a ruling from Sharia scholars gives credibility and legitimacy to these products. However, scholars may be linked to a specific school of thought, which may or may not be accepted in certain regions in Ethiopia. 14 The other way of ensuring Sharia compliance is to have a Sharia Advisory Board. It would be composed of Islamic finance experts, which are not necessarily scholars, but have gained sufficient Islamic finance expertise to provide expert opinions and recommendations in structuring IFB products. The advantage of Sharia Advisors is that they do not have any specific affiliation but on the other hand, they are not considered as a religious authority. Options would be as follow: 1) National Supervisory or Advisory Board + Supervisory or Advisory Board at the institutional level (Example Malaysia, Pakistan, Bahrain, Oman, etc.) 2) Supervisory or Advisory Board at the institutional level only (UK, South Africa, Kuwait, Qatar, etc.) NBE should decide whether it would like to have a National Sharia Board or leave it at the institutions level. This type of board at the National level helps preserve secrecy for banks. Also, as a board it not financially rewarded by commercial entities, no conflicts of interest can arise from such entities. Therefore having a national Sharia board at the NBE level would harmonise the product offering. The disadvantage of having a board at the national level is the potential affiliation with groups of Sharia scholars, which may be unfavourably regarded by some communities. Therefore an intermediary solution would be to have a National Advisory Board with an Interest Free Advisory Firm sitting on the NBE board level. If the NBE opts for no National Interest Free Advisory Board, the best way to ensure institutions offer products that are genuinely Islamic is to require them to comply with certain rules, such as ensuring advisors have experience in both Sharia law and Islamic financial products, with a diverse board. The advantage of having a sharia board at an institutional level is the non-affiliation of NBE with a specific group of Sharia Scholars, while controlling the quality of the composition of these boards. This option, however presents the danger of conflicts of interest between the Sharia experts and the financial entities. The last option is for the NBE not to interfere in the Sharia matters. This option leaves financial institutions at risk of putting forward products that are non-compliant with Islamic principles, because of the lack of a board that approves products and vets legal document, manuals and procedures. It would also require additional scrutiny from NBE, which will need at the time of launch to verify whether IFB products are Islamic or not. The IFB windows will need to be more carefully vetted during monitoring and auditing phases. Capacity building/Training (knowledge sharing) We have identified, in the previous section, a lack of skilled Islamic finance experts on a global basis and this gap is even wider on a local basis in Ethiopia. 15 Capacity building can be done in 2 phases. First build skills and knowledge of local trainers then transfer knowledge from these trainers to the relevant staff members in Amharic language. In order to develop skills and knowledge of the trainers in Ethiopia the key is to find the most appropriate way to provide these trainers with the right skills needed. Accredited training One avenue for building capacity is through accredited trainings. Chartered Institute for Securities and Investments (CISI) has developed the most renowned Islamic Finance accredited training program. The Islamic Finance Qualification is composed of 9 modules and is an internationally recognised certification by CISI. Candidates will gain an accredited qualification upon completion of a 2 hours examination. If trainers are qualified by IFQ, it means they have reached a certain level of understanding of Islamic financial products. Moreover the exam is relatively inexpensive compared to other accredited programs. The registration to the exam costs less than £200. However, given that the diploma is very broad it may not provide the technical skills needed by local financial institutions in Ethiopia. The Chartered Institute for Management Accountants (CIMA) also offers an accredited Diploma in Islamic Finance, which is composed of 4 modules: Islamic commercial law, Islamic banking & Takaful, Islamic capital markets and Islamic Accounting. For the Ethiopian market only 3 certificates would be relevant: Islamic commercial law, Islamic banking & Takaful, and Islamic Accounting. CIMA is more comprehensive than IFQ, however the price of enrolling to CIMA course is quite high. Each module costs £275 for self-study and even more for enrolling in a class. In house training: Another avenue for building knowledge and capacity is through in-house training and exposure trips, which are specifically customised for the Ethiopian audience. These can be designed by entering into partnerships with accredited training companies who can guarantee that the content is accurate and tailored for the Ethiopian market. (Please find in appendix 3 a proposed curriculum for IFB in Ethiopia). NBE Institute for Financial Studies as well as local universities could consider including curriculum on IFB. Conferences & seminars Aside from training capacity building, knowledge can also be gained through conferences and seminars. Ethiopia can host an annual international Islamic finance seminar where it would attract international experts to share their knowledge and expertise. Hosting these sorts of events have worked effectively in Djibouti. The cost and logistics could be handled directly by the event organizer with support of the NBE and other banks. Knowledge portal: 16 Another way to share knowledge is through the development of a portal, which would be specifically designed for the Ethiopian market. The portal can contain key information regarding the IFB legislation and directives as well as the product offering, IFB products, definitions, information on upcoming trainings, etc. The portal can contain English and Amharic. While the advantages seem numerous, there could be a significant cost involved in developing the platform, gathering the content and putting the content in local language. Working group: Last but not least is the idea of having a working group for IFB. The role of the working group is to share knowledge and consolidate efforts towards the same goal. Given that the current directive presents multiple hurdles to have a full IFB offering, it would help to address these issues in a working group. Public Awareness One way to increase awareness among clientele, who have opted out of receiving interest on their savings account, is to send them a notification that their account will be moved to an Interest free account with the new terms and conditions of the IFB saving account. The advantage of this approach is that Interest Free windows will have immediate access to an additional source of funding for IFB loans. We also identified in the previous section that there is very important reach out to new customer and increase the number of users of IFB services. For instance in Australia, surveys distributed at the exits of mosques to have a better understanding on how much the local communities know about IFB. The results of these surveys have been used to develop strategic marketing campaigns. These latter are needed in cities and in rural areas to reach out to pastoralist communities in Ethiopia. 17 III - Recommendations and course of action Interest-Free Banking in Ethiopia has some challenges mainly due to the lack of a proper and strong policy along with a shortage of local qualified Islamic finance experts and Scholars. In order for IFB to gain popularity in the Ethiopia, each of these challenges need to be addressed adequately. Legal framework We recommend that the NBE bases the IFB directive on AAOIFI standards and prudential standards on IFSB. Internationally recognised standards could also be used for developing not only IFB products but also micro financing products, which adheres to Islamic principles. While we understand Ethiopia is a secular country and is not in position to assess whether a particular practice is acceptable by a group of scholars and not by another and hence would not like to take a specific position as to which school of thought is most suitable. We recommend NBE provide some guidance to IFB windows on the composition of the Interest Free Advisory board. The most suitable board composition would be as follow: a) 1 International renowned scholar or adviser who brings the international expertise and experience b) 1 Scholar from Islamic Affairs Supreme Council in Ethiopia who understands the local factor c) 1 junior Sharia Adviser/scholar in-house who addresses the day-to-day questions in collaboration with a & b At the NBE, there should be a group of experts that reviews, vets and authorises IFB windows, as it might be too sensitive to have Sharia scholars sitting at the National Board level. Skills, capacity building and knowledge sharing In terms of skills, capacity building and knowledge sharing, the starting point would be to create a working group for IFB in Ethiopia, to consolidate efforts towards the same goal. Given the current legislation and directive presents multiple hurdles to have a full IFB offering, it would help to address these as a group. The working group can be officially formed during the upcoming exposure trip to London (October 2014). The group should be composed by: a) NBE (from the banking supervision and from microfinance supervision) b) Ethiopian Institute for Financial Studies (Person in charge of the curriculums and 1 to 2 lecturers) c) Ethiopian Islamic Affairs Supreme Council (2 to 3 scholars) 18 d) Commercial Banks (OIB, CBE and United Bank + other banks that envisage to launch IFB Windows) e) Microfinance Institutions (Somali Microfinance, Rays + other microfinance institutions envisage to launch IFB services) f) Ethiopia Bankers Association g) Microfinance Association h) PRIME i) Technical advisor(s) (Islamic Finance Navigator ltd. or another Sharia Advisory firm) The working group should meet at least twice a year to address changes in the directives, capacity-building, increase in awareness, etc. The most efficient and cost effective way to develop skill and knowledge is to have a “train the trainers” program. 2 or 3 employees of each of the members of the working group will need to reach a high level of expertise in Islamic banking and finance. This will facilitate the understanding and discussion of the working group and also it will provide the skills needed to transfer knowledge locally. This group of about 40 individuals will need to gain an accredited training certificate in Islamic finance. It is essential to develop course materials, which are specifically designed for the Ethiopian market and can be used by this new breed of IFB expert for training staff at local branches and staff working in microfinance institutions. The content can be developed in coordination with an Accredited Training Provider. Given the lack of accredited training providers in Ethiopia, the content will initially be developed in English and then translated in Amharic language. Public Awareness In terms of public awareness of IFB products, we recommend the first step would be to inform the client base which has opted out of receiving interest on the conventional products, their new accounts terms and conditions. A clear explanation that their monies will now be used to finance projects which are in compliance with Islamic financial principles should be provided to these customers. Obtaining feedback from existing and prospective IFB customers could be used as a base for developing an adequate marketing strategy for IFB products. Further marketing and communications strategies can be developed as regulations and products are put in place. These strategies could be designed to target: Members of Ethiopia Bankers Association Members of Microfinance Association Universities Mosques Ethiopian Islamic Affairs Supreme Council 19 Summary recommendations Legal framework Develop IFB standards based on AAOIFI & IFSB Create an IFB advisory Board within NBE Provide guidance on IFB windows on setting up their own advisory board Capacity building initiatives Setup IFB working group Train a new bread of IFB experts based on International accredited programs Develop adequate training programs for IFB in Ethiopia The new bread of IFB experts to transfer the skills to the local branches Public awareness Design and plan public awareness programs for: existing clients, bankers and microfinance associations, universities, mosques and Ethiopian Islamic Affairs Supreme Council 20 IV – Implementation The below figure shows a potential timeline for implementing the recommended course of action. 1. The circles in green show the stages from the policy review all the way to the implementation of the revised policy. 2. The red square propose a course of action for building skills, knowledge and capacity 3. The yellow triangles are preliminary steps needed before awareness campaigns can be developed Note that these are only suggestions and should be adopted depending on choices relating to strategies and capabilities. Appendix Appendix 1: Benchmark of relevant countries 1.1 Pakistan 182 million 1299$ Population GDP per capita Economy breakdown (Valued added % of GDP) 24% Industry 22% 54% Agriculture Services Common law & Interest Free Law Legal system Banking Companies Ordinance (BCO), 1962 Mudaraba Companies and Mudarabas Ordinance (MCMO), 1980 Zakat Ordinance (ZO), 1980 Key Islamic BCO Amendment, 1980 Finance Banking and Financial Services Ordinance, 1984 Legislation State bank of Pakistan Circular ,1984 ZO Amendment, 2000 Income Tax Ordinance (ITO) 2001 Microfinance Institutions Ordinance (MIO) 2001 Figure: Summary of Pakistan’s profile2 In 1980, Pakistan made legislation changes such as the enactment of MCMO, to introduce Islamic finance. However, these changes had very limited success due to the unavailability of adequate infrastructure, lack of trained human resources and a ruling by Federal Sharia Court (November 1991) declaring the procedures adopted by banks as un-Islamic. In 2000-2001, Islamic banking was successfully re-launched gradually allowing Islamic banks to operate in parallel with conventional banks. A comprehensive Islamic law compliance framework was introduced to ensure Islamic banks operations were in conformity with Islamic law principles. Experiencing yearly double digit growth since 2003, Islamic banking constitutes presently around 10% of country’s banking assets with 19 banks. Islamic microfinance has grown to 14 banking institutions with 350 branches serving more than 500,000 clients with a broad range of products like micro Takaful. The growth of Islamic banking during the last decade has catalysed the development of Islamic capital markets, mutual funds, Takaful companies and Islamic social finance through Zakat. In 2012, Pakistan had 5 Takaful operators and approximately 2 Population, GDP per capita are 2013 figures. Economy breakdown are 2012 figures. Source of all figures is the world bank (http://data.worldbank.org/) 30 Islamic mutual funds. In 2011, mobilization of Zakat is estimated to have grown by 40% in Pakistan from 2008 to 105 million in 2011. Zakat is deducted from all bank accounts (except current accounts) having a particular sum of money (announced every year). Zakat is redistributed towards social welfare such as education (20-30 %) and healthcare (10-20 %)3. Pakistan’s new 5-year plan from 2014 to 2018 for Islamic banking, which Pakistan aims to see increased from 10% to 15% of total financial sector assets by 2018, prioritizes the broad based distribution of economic gains by using Zakat and Awqaf. To promote greater economic equality, Pakistan’s 5-year Islamic banking plan focuses on housing, SMEs, exports and agriculture. 1.2 South Africa 53 million 6618$ GDP per capita Economy breakdown (Valued added % of GDP) 2% 28% 70% Agriculture Industry Services Mix of Dutch civil law, common law & African customary law Legal system Key Islamic finance Income Tax Act 58 Amendment J24 2010 legislation Figure: Summary of South Africa’s profile4 Population Although there is no legislation dedicated solely to Islamic banking, South Africa’s banking regulators have taken various measures to develop and promote the Islamic finance industry by creating an equitable playing field between interest based and interest free finance. Tax laws (Section 24JA of the income tax act) were amended in 2010 to provide parity tax treatment between Interest free finance products and conventional banking products. The amendments also define taxes for diminishing Musharaka, Mudaraba, Murabaha and sukuk. Zakat institutions are governed under Nonprofit Organizations Act of 1997 and zakat collection is on a voluntary basis. The country currently has one Islamic bank; Al Baraka Bank launched in 1989. Other banks such as First National Bank (FNB), Absa Bank and HBZ Bank house have Islamic finance windows alongside their conventional banking services. Total Islamic banking assets currently account for 1%-2% of total banking assets. In the insurance market, only one Takaful company has set up operations in South Africa. Regarding Zakat, South Africa 3 All figures for Zakat are from Islamic social finance report 2014, Thomson Reuters Population, GDP per capita and Economy breakdown are 2013 World bank figures. (http://data.worldbank.org/) 4 23 The Islamic finance industry in South Africa suffers from various challenges including the lack of skilled labour and the absence of a complete framework for Islamic finance products. 1.3 Kenya 43 million 994$ GDP per capita Economy breakdown (Valued added % of GDP) 30% 17% 53% Agriculture Industry Services Common law & African Customary Law Legal system Banking Act Sect 12 amendment (exempting on restrictions trading & Key Islamic holding fixed assets) , 2006 finance Banking Act Sect 16 amendment (introducing concept of return) , 2009 Legislation Population Finance Act Sect 45 amendment, 2010 Figure: Summary of Kenya’s profile5 Islamic banking emerged when Section 12 of the Banking Act restricting trading and holding of fixed assets was amended in 2006 to exempt products from trading and holding of fixed assets restrictions. Barclays launched Islamic banking products during the same period. First Community Bank, Kenya first Islamic bank opened in 2007 followed by Gulf African Bank, in 2008. Later on, conventional banks such as Kenya Commercial Bank and Standard Chartered Bank opened Islamic windows to offer Islamic finance products. In 2009, the Kenyan authorities amended Section 45 of the Central Bank of Kenya Act to allow the Central Bank to recognize the payment of a return rather than interest on government securities, to encourage interest free investments in the country. At the end of 2013, Islamic banking represented 2 % of the total banking assets in Kenya. In 2014, Kenya's Capital Market Authority developed a separate regulatory framework to promote interest free finance by focusing on corporate governance, information disclosure, a policyholder compensation fund and responsible pricing. In the insurance market, Takaful Insurance of Africa, the first Islamic insurance company in the country, was launched in 2011 as an alternative to conventional insurance aimed at increasing insurance penetration and improving the perception and image of Insurance locally. The model was designed to serve people of all faiths and backgrounds, despite reference to Islamic laws. The first interest free reinsurance 5 Population, GDP per capita are 2013 figures. Economy breakdown are 2012 figures. Source of all figures is the world bank (http://data.worldbank.org/) 24 firm, Kenya reinsurance Corp is planning to open soon. Finally, on the microfinance front, Islamic microfinance is still in its infancy with Islamic Relief working with international agencies to introduce Islamic microfinance in the country. 1.4 Egypt 82 million 3314$ GDP per capita Economy breakdown (Valued added % of GDP) 39% 15% 46% Agriculture Industry Services Roman law & Islamic law Legal system Law No. 48/1977 (creation of Faisal Islamic Bank of Egypt) Key Islamic Law No. 43/1974 (creation of Islamic International Bank finance for Legislation Investment and Development) Law No. 10/2013 (Sukuk law) Population Figure: Summary of Egypt’s profile6 Egypt has many influential scholars who largely fuelled the debate on the prohibition of interest, contributing to the creation and development of the modern Islamic finance industry. The Egyptian Islamic finance sector is made up of a few full-fledged Islamic banks, and a number of conventional banks offering Interest free finance products. Three banks currently dominate the sector: Faisal Islamic bank of Egypt established in 1977, Egyptian Saudi Finance Bank, created in1988, United Bank, who acquired in 2006, Islamic International Bank for Investment and Development, created in 1974. Some conventional banks such as National Bank of Egypt and Ahli United Bank, have Islamic finance windows. In 2012, Egypt had 14 Islamic banking licenses. The industry had 200 branches and $20 billion of assets representing less than 1% of the total assets of the banking industry in Egypt. In 2013, Egypt passed Law No. 10/2013, allowing the government to issue Sukuk, regulated by Egyptian Financial Supervisory Authority (EFSA) and a Sharia Board. On the Islamic microfinance front, the sector is dominated Abu Dhabi Islamic bank Egypt (ADIBE). ADIBE launched its Microfinance business in collaboration with US AID, CIDA, UNICEF, and Ford Foundation in 1987. According to its website, ADIBE has 44 microfinance branches across 18 governorates. The microfinance 6 Population, GDP per capita and Economy breakdown are 2013 World Bank figures. (http://data.worldbank.org/) 25 program covers amounts from LE 1000 (140USD) to LE 50,000 (7000 USD) with soft financing terms and without requirements of traditional conventional banking collaterals. ADIB Egypt microfinance program offers a range of distinctive services to the informal sector of micro-business namely financing, savings, and insurance, through Murabaha and Musharaka programs. 26 1.5 Sudan Population Agriculture Legal system Key Islamic Legislation 38 million GDP per capita Economy breakdown (Valued added % of GDP) 28% 31% Industry Services Common law & Islamic Law finance Banking Business ( Organization) Act, 1991 Banking Business ( Organization) Act, 2003 1753$ 41% Figure: Summary of Sudan’s profile7 The banking system in Sudan was dominated by conventional banks until 1977, when the first Islamic bank was created. 5 more Islamic banks were launched before 1989, when the government decided to change the whole banking system to an Islamic Banking system. In 1991, the government enacted a new Banking Business (Organization) Act, which decreed all banking finance transactions for all banks in Sudan must be managed according to Islamic law. In 2013, there were 34 Islamic banks in Sudan. Sudan was the first nation to introduce Takaful in 1979. The Takaful model in Sudan is the basic model of co-operative Islamic insurance, where policyholders pay contributions into a fund where they share risks based on the principle of mutual cooperation. Any surplus of the fund must be reserved or distributed. Takaful companies in Sudan are founded as shareholding companies. Shareholders, in addition to remuneration, received for running the company, only have the right to receive their return on invested capital. The Sudanese Insurance market despite its historical position as a pioneer of Takaful continues to face low penetration ratios and economic challenges. Low income levels of the Sudanese, high inflation, lack of competent underwriting, among other issues continue to plague the market. The Sudanese government has supported development of a robust and vibrant Islamic microfinance sector focused on community enterprises and shared assets. Collaboration with Middle East development agencies established 2 new Islamic microfinance institutions in 2012: IRADA was set up with $50 million in capital with backing from the Bank of Khartoum and the Islamic Development Bank. Al-Ebda’a was set up in with $5 million in capital (25% The Islamic Development Bank 40% Arab Gulf Program (AGFUND), 20% Sudanese government, 15% private sector). It seeks to serve 80,000 clients with $23 million in credit by its fifth year 7 Population, GDP per capita are 2013 figures. Economy breakdown are 2012 figures. Source of all figures is the world bank (http://data.worldbank.org/) 27 Due to the lack microfinance legislation, Sudan has relatively onerous collateral requirements which have impeded the growth of the microfinance sector in the country. 1.6 Indonesia 250 million GDP per capita Economy breakdown (Valued added % of GDP) 14% 46% Agriculture Industry Services Common law & Islamic Law Legal system Banking Act no 7, 1992 Banking Act no 10, 1998 Zakat Act, 1999 Key Islamic finance Central Bank Act no 23, 1999 Legislation Zakat Act, 2011 Population 3475$ 40% Figure: Summary of Indonesia’s profile8 In 1992, amending the Banking Act 14 (1967), the government enacted the Banking Act 7, allowing the creation of a dual banking system, which includes Islamic banks. The first Islamic bank, PT Bank Muamalat Indonesia (BMI), was launched that same year in the capital. Some rural Islamic banks were also established in Java. BMI faced several challenges on the liquidity front due to a lack of market instruments as the central bank did not provide special central bank facilities complying with Islamic principles such as discount windows or central bank credit facilities. In 1998, to overcome these problems, the government amended the Banking Act (Act 10), improving the legal foundation for Islamic banking. Conventional banks were permitted to open Islamic banking windows and in 1999, through the amendment of Central Bank Act, the central bank allowed monetary control with instruments based on Islamic principles. Since then, the central bank has worked along with the National Sharia Board (Dewan Syariah Nasional), affiliated with the Indonesian Council of Ulamas (Majelis Ulama Indonesia), in order to regulate and clarify the permissibility of various financial products. The government has actively promoted Islamic microfinance through the development of Islamic rural banks (IRBs). In 2002, Bank Indonesia created a nineyear plan for Islamic finance sector development, including support for IRBs. Indonesia developed a supportive regulatory framework and licensed several new local IRBs to offer banking services (loans and savings facilities, but no payments services) per district area. Each IRB has a Sharia board to monitor the conformity of 8 Population, GDP per capita and Economy breakdown are 2013 World Bank figures. (http://data.worldbank.org/) 28 products to Islamic principles. However, board rulings are inconsistent, and consequently, Islamic microfinance products can vary widely depending on IRBs. Bank Indonesia also focused on capacity building by establishing a centre in Medan to offer training and certification on Islamic finance to IRBs staff, managers, and directors. The Zakat Act 2011 created zakat management institutions to improve the management of Zakat services effectiveness and efficiency and the benefits of zakah for poverty alleviation where Zakat is managed by a new independent body Badan Amis Zakat Nasional (BAZNAS) who is responsible for planning, implementation, controlling the collection process, distribution and utilization of zakah and reporting the operational performance of zakah management. 1.7 Oman Population Legal system Key Islamic Legislation 3.6 million GDP per capita Common law & Islamic Law 22181$ finance Royal Decree 69/2012 (Islamic Banking Law), 2012 Figure: Summary of Oman’s profile9 In December 2012, the Islamic banking law was enacted by Royal Decree 69/2012, and some provisions of the Banking Law (Royal Decree 114/2000) were amended. 2 weeks later, the Central Bank of Oman (the “CBO”) issued a 589 page circular detailing the Islamic Banking Framework of Royal Decree 69/2012. The Islamic Banking Law and framework address critical structural elements such as Islamic banking transactional base in the country, taxation, land law constraints and Sharia boards at the level of the individual banks and at higher levels. As the country does not have a history of formal Sharia-compliant banking, the country biggest challenges are the education of the general public about Islamic finance, the shortage of skilled resources and the shortage of available products for banks to place their surplus liquidity. Two new dedicated Islamic banks, Bank Nizwa and Alizz Islamic Bank, and Islamic banking windows in seven conventional lenders have already launched or are in the process of launching their operations in the country. 9 Population and GDP per capita are 2013 World Bank figures. (http://data.worldbank.org/) 29 Appendix 2: International Regulating Bodies In addition to the country specific banking and IFB regulations and guidelines, there are a couple of international Islamic finance agencies responsible for providing regulations, standards and procedures for enforcing and regulating the soundness of Islamic banking industry. This section will give an overview of these key bodies, their role and also the list of countries which has adopted these standards either at the regulatory level or on a financial institution's level to follow the best practices in Islamic banking and finance. 2.1 International Financial Services Board (IFSB) IFSB was launched in 2002 in Kuala Lumpur and serves as an international standard setting body that provides prudential standards and guidelines for regulatory and supervisory agencies to ensure soundness and stability Islamic Financial industry including: retail banking, capital markets and Takaful (Islamic insurance). The IFSB has: 13 standards 5 guidenotes 1 technical note As of September 2014, IFSB members comprise of 184 members from 41 jurisdictions, including 32 members from the African continent. IFSB has 55 regulatory and supervisory authorities, 8 international/intergovernmental organisations and 121 market players, professional firms and industry associations. (source: IFSB) Several non-predominantly Muslim countries have adopted IFSB rulings including: China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Singapore and Thailand. Members from regulatory and supervisory authorities in Africa include: Djibouti: Banque Centrale de Djibouti Libya: Central bank of Libya Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius, Financial Services Commission Mauritius Morocco: Bank Al Maghrib Nigeria: Central bank of Nigeria, National Insurance Commission Senegal: Ministry of Economy and Finances Senegal, Banque Centrale Des Etats de L'afrique de L'ouest Sudan: Central Bank of Sudan, Khartoum Stock Exchange Sudan, The Insurance Supervisory Authority Sudan Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia Zambia: Bank of Zambia 30 Members from market players, professional firms and industry associations in Africa include: Egypt: Al Baraka Bank Egypt, Faisal Islamic Bank Kenya: Chase Bank (Kenya) Limited Nigeria: Ahmed Zakari & Co (Chartered Accountants), Lotus Capital Limited South Africa: Oasis Crescent Capital (PTY) Ltd. Sudan: Al Jazeera Sudanese Jordanian Bank, Al Salam Bank, Animal Resources Bank, Bank of Khartoum, Byblos Bank Africa Ltd, Faisal Islamic Bank, Farmer's Commercial Bank, Industrial Development Bank, Islamic Insurance Company, Omdurman National Bank, Shiekan Insurance and Reinsurance Co. Ltd, Sudan Financial Services Company, Sudanese French Bank, Tadamon Islamic Bank 2.2 Accounting and Auditing organization for Islamic financial institutions (AAOIFI) AAOIFI is responsible for developing and issuing standards for the Islamic finance industry. AAOIFI has 88 standards including: 48 Sharia 26 Accounting 5 Auditing 7 Governance 2 Ethics AAOIFI has over 200 members in more than 40 countries. Members include regulatory and supervisory authorities, international/intergovernmental organisations and market players, professional firms and industry associations. Countries adopting AAOIFI include: Kingdom of Bahrain, Dubai International Financial Centre, Jordan, Lebanon, Qatar, Sudan and Syria. Countries with guideline based on AAOIFI: Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, South Africa and United Kingdom. AAOIFI standards have introduced greater harmonisation among Islamic finance actors across the world. 31 Appendix 3: Sample of IFB curriculum for building capacity of trainers in Ethiopia Module 1: Introduction of IFB Module 2: Islamic commercial law Sources of Islamic commercial law Methodology of interpretation of Islamic commercial law Formation of contracts Classification of IFB contracts Comparison of classifications of contract Traditional Islamic contracts and Islamic finance Overview of IFB products Application of Islamic contacts in IFB windows Implementation of Sharia standards, policies and ruling in Islamic finance Module 3: IFB o Financial regulation & market standards o Deposits and investment accounts o IFB products and services o Trade finance & treasure products o The financial and operational risks of IFB windows Module 4: Accounting for IFB windows o o o o o o o o o o Framework of financial reporting for IFB windows o Financial reporting of IFB windows o Financial statements - balance sheet and statement of restricted investments o Financial statements - income statement & accounting policies on income determination o Equity investment accounts and profit distribution policy o Accounting and reporting - Mudaraba and Musharaka financing o Accounting and reporting - Murabaha financing o Accounting and reporting - Ijara and Ijara muntahia bi tam leek o Accounting and reporting - Salam and Istisna financing o Auditing of IFB windows 32 Appendix 4: Zakat Banks with an IFB window can play different roles in the management of the Zakat fund and this has to clearly features in the annual report of the bank. IFB windows are responsible for the Zakat payment on its own assets, or it can offer its services for the calculation of Zakat, and in some cases propose a distribution channel to its clients. In either case, the banks role in this matter should be clearly stated in its annual report. 33