Diapositiva 1

advertisement

ADSORPTION ISOTHERMS discontinuous jumps: layering transitions bilayer condensation monolayer condensation coexistence pressure some layering transitions

t

= 0.45

0.60

two-phase region two-phase region two-phase region two-phase region two-phase region liquid-vapour transition of monolayer

at two-phase coexistence

SV

 

SL

 

LV

SV

 

SL

= 

LV q > 0 q = 0

Y ( r s

)

Y ( r s

) = Q ( r s

)

if there exists e such that there is a wetting transition, this is of 2 nd order r s

Y ( r s

)

PARTIAL

WETTING

T<T

W

PARTIAL

WETTING

T<T

W

COMPLETE

WETTING

T=T

W

COMPLETE

WETTING

T>T

W

r

V r s  d r

Y ( r

)

= r

V r s  d r

r  e

=

2

 r s

2  r

V

2

 r s

 r

V

= 

0

( r s

)

 

0

( r

V

) area under curve

contribution from hard interaction contribution from attractive interaction

(with correlations = step function)

a

0, b

| a

|, l

< l s a

0, b

>0, l s

< l a(T

W

)

=0

Adsorption isotherms: Langmuir's model

Kr adsorbed on exfoliated graphite at T=77.3K

N s adatoms

e s binding energy

N adsorption sites ( N > N s

)

Distinguishable, non-interacting particles

Vapour sector

The partition function is:

Z

N

=  i e

 

E i

=

N s

!

(

N !

N

N s

)!

e

 

N e s

Using Stirling's approx., the free energy is:

F

=  kT log Z

N

= 

N e s

N s kT

 q log q  q =

N s

/ N coverage

( 1

 q

) log( 1

 q

)

Chemical potential of the film:

 f

=

F

N

N s

, T

=

F

 q d q

N s

, T dN

=  e s

 kT log q

1

 q

Film and bulk vapour are in equilibrium:

 e s

 kT log q

1

 q

=  kT log

 kT p

 3

 p

*  p

 3 kT

= q e

 e s

1

 q

At low coverage p

* = q e

 e s

1

 q 

...

 q e

 e s linear for low q

(Henry's law)

This allows for an estimation of adsorption energies e s measuring the p q slope by

Fowler and Guggenheim's model

Langmuir considers no mobility

Fowler and Guggenheim neglect xy localisation, consider full mobility (localisation only in z) and again no adatom interaction

E s

H

= 

N e s

 i

N 

=

1

The free energy is: p i

2

2 m

F

= 

N

 e s

 kT log

Ae

N

 2 

Z

N

=

1

N !

Ae

e s

 2

N

Linear regime: has to do

A = surface area with absence of interactions

Again, calculating to

 f and equating

 of the (ideal) bulk gas: p

* =  2 ne

 e s n

=

N / A

 q

(two-dimensional density)

Binder and Landau

Monte Carlo simulation of lattice-gas model with parameters for adsorption of H on Pd(100)

Limiting isotherm for T

= 

Corrections from 2D virial coefficients

two-phase regions

2D critical points

Multilayer condensation in the liquid regime ellipsometric adsorption measurements of pentane on graphite

Kruchten et al. (2005)

Full phase diagram of a monolayer

Periodic quasi-2D solid

Commensurate or incommensurate?

Ar/graphite (Migone et al. (1984) incommensurate solid

Kr/graphite two length scales:

• lattice parameter of graphite

• adatom diameter three energy scales :

• adsorption energy

• adatom interaction

• kT (entropy) commensurate monolayer

3

3

30 º incommensurate monolayer

(also called floating phase)

Specht et al. (1984)

Kr/graphite

Two-dimensional crystals

Absence of long-range order in 2D (Peierls, '30)

There is no true long-range order in 2D at T>0 due to excitation of long wave-length phonons with 

  kT n k

, s

=

( k

, s ) kT

 k

, s population of phonons with frequency mode with force constant f k

, s

= m

 k , s

 k , s

1

2 f k

, s x k

2

, s

= n  k , s

 k

, s

= kT

 k

, s

 k

, s

The total mean displacement is

= kT x

2 = kT m

2 

1

, s

 a

1 d x k

L

1

= g (

)

2

2 kT m

2

 k , s

Using the Debye approximation for the density of states: g (

)

2

,

, 3 D

2 D

The mean square displacement when L goes to infinity is x

2 = kT m

1

2  d

 g (

)

2

 a

1 

L

1

L log a

 const

, 3 D

2 D

Therefore, the periodic crystal structure vanishes in the thermodynamic limit

However, the divergence in < x 2 > is weak: in order to have x

2  a

2 , L has to be astronomical!

This is for the harmonic solid; there are more general proofs though

XY model and Kosterlitz-Thouless (KT)

Freely-rotating 2D spins 

J

 s i

 s

 j

= 

J cos

  i

 j

The ground state is a perfectly ordered arrangement of spins

But: there is no ordered state (long-range order) for T>0

Consider a spin-wave excitation:

The energy is:

L ( 2

/ L ) in 1 D

L

2

( 2

/ L ) in 2 D

L

3

( 2

/ L ) in 3 D goes to a constant: spin wave stable and no ordered state limiting case (in fact NO) grows without limit: ordered state robust w.r.t. T

Even though there is no long-range order, there may exist quasi-longrange order

No true long-range order: exponentially decaying correlations

• True long-range order: correlation function goes to a constant

• Quasi-long-range order(QLRO): algebraically decaying correlations

QLRO corresponds to a critical phase

Not all 2D models have QLRO:

• 2D Ising model has true long-range order (order parameter n=1 )

• XY model superfluid films, thin superconductors, 2D crystals (order parameter n=2 ) only have QLRO

Spin excitations in the XY model can be discussed in terms of vortices (elementary excitations), which destroy long-range order

vortex topological charge = +1 antivortex topological charge = -1

We calculate the free energy of a vortex

The contribution from a ring a spins situated a distance r from the vortex centre is

 q =

2

2

 r

=

1

, r

J

2

 q

2

 

=

J r

The total energy is

E v

= 

L a dr

J r

= 

J log

L a

The free energy is

F v

=

E v

TS v

= 

J log

L

 kT log a lattice parameter

L a

2

=

 

J

2 kT

 log

L a the vortex centre can be located at ( L/a ) 2 different sites

When F v

= 0 vortex will proliferate:

Vortices interact as

 =  

Kv i v j log r ij a kT c

J

=

2

=

1 .

571 ...

Vortices of same vorticity attract each other

Vortices of different vorticity repel each other

But one has to also consider bound vortex pairs

-1 +1

They do not disrupt order at long distances

Easy to excite

Screen vortex interactions

KT theory: renormalisation-group treatment of screening effects

Confirmed experimentally for 2D supefluids and superconductor films. Also for XY model (by computer simulation)

Predictions:

• For T>T c there is a disordered phase, with free vortices and free bound vortex pairs s

 i

 s

 j

 e

 r ij

/

    for T

T c

• For

T<T c

 s i

• For

T=T c there is QLRO (bound vortex pairs)

 s

 j

 r

 

( T )  

1

4 for T there is a continuous phase transition

T c

K renormalises to a universal limiting value and then drops to zero

Two-dimensional melting

The KT theory can be generalised for solids: KTHNY theory

There is a substrate. Also, there are two types of order:

• Positional order : correlations between atomic positions

Characterised e.g. by g

 r

 r

'

• Bond-orientational order : correlations between directions of relative vectors between neighbouring atoms w.r.t. fixed crystallographic axis: g

6

 r

 r

'

= e

6 i

 q

( r

)

 q

( r

' )

The analogue of a vortex is a a disclination

A disclination disrupts long-range positional order, but not the bond-orientational order

In a crystal disclinations are bound in pairs, which are dislocations, and which restore (quasi-) long-range positional order

Dislocations

Burgers vector

Download