Chapter 3: Processes (6th edition chap 4) Chapter 3: Processes Process Concept Process Scheduling Operations on Processes Cooperating Processes Interprocess Communication Communication in Client-Server Systems Operating System Concepts 3.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Process Concept An operating system executes a variety of programs: Batch system – jobs Time-shared systems – user programs or tasks Textbook uses the terms job and process almost interchangeably Process – a program in execution; process execution must progress in sequential fashion A process includes: program counter stack data section Operating System Concepts 3.3 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Process in Memory Operating System Concepts 3.4 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Process State As a process executes, it changes state new: The process is being created running: Instructions are being executed waiting: The process is waiting for some event to occur ready: The process is waiting to be assigned to a process terminated: The process has finished execution Operating System Concepts 3.5 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Diagram of Process State Operating System Concepts 3.6 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Process Control Block (PCB) Information associated with each process Process state Program counter CPU registers CPU scheduling information Memory-management information Accounting information I/O status information Operating System Concepts 3.7 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Process Control Block (PCB) Operating System Concepts 3.8 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 CPU Switch From Process to Process Operating System Concepts 3.9 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Process Scheduling Queues Job queue – set of all processes in the system Ready queue – set of all processes residing in main memory, ready and waiting to execute Device queues – set of processes waiting for an I/O device Processes migrate among the various queues Operating System Concepts 3.10 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Ready Queue And Various I/O Device Queues Operating System Concepts 3.11 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Representation of Process Scheduling Operating System Concepts 3.12 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Schedulers Long-term scheduler (or job scheduler) – selects which processes should be brought into the ready queue Short-term scheduler (or CPU scheduler) – selects which process should be executed next and allocates CPU Operating System Concepts 3.13 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Addition of Medium Term Scheduling Operating System Concepts 3.14 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Schedulers (Cont.) Short-term scheduler is invoked very frequently (milliseconds) (must be fast) Long-term scheduler is invoked very infrequently (seconds, minutes) (may be slow) The long-term scheduler controls the degree of multiprogramming Processes can be described as either: I/O-bound process – spends more time doing I/O than computations, many short CPU bursts CPU-bound process – spends more time doing computations; few very long CPU bursts Operating System Concepts 3.15 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Context Switch When CPU switches to another process, the system must save the state of the old process and load the saved state for the new process Context-switch time is overhead; the system does no useful work while switching Time dependent on hardware support Operating System Concepts 3.16 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Process Creation Parent process create children processes, which, in turn create other processes, forming a tree of processes Resource sharing Parent and children share all resources Children share subset of parent’s resources Parent and child share no resources Execution Parent and children execute concurrently Parent waits until children terminate Operating System Concepts 3.17 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Process Creation (Cont.) Address space Child duplicate of parent Child has a program loaded into it UNIX examples fork system call creates new process exec system call used after a fork to replace the process’ memory space with a new program Operating System Concepts 3.18 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Process Creation Operating System Concepts 3.19 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 C Program Forking Separate Process int main() { Pid_t pid; /* fork another process */ pid = fork(); if (pid < 0) { /* error occurred */ fprintf(stderr, "Fork Failed"); exit(-1); } else if (pid == 0) { /* child process */ execlp("/bin/ls", "ls", NULL); } else { /* parent process */ /* parent will wait for the child to complete */ wait (NULL); printf ("Child Complete"); exit(0); } } Operating System Concepts 3.20 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 A tree of processes on a typical Solaris Operating System Concepts 3.21 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Process Termination Process executes last statement and asks the operating system to delete it (exit) Output data from child to parent (via wait) Process’ resources are deallocated by operating system Parent may terminate execution of children processes (abort) Child has exceeded allocated resources Task assigned to child is no longer required If parent is exiting Some operating system do not allow child to continue if its parent terminates – Operating System Concepts All children terminated - cascading termination 3.22 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Switch to Pipe exam Operating System Concepts 3.23 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Cooperating Processes Independent process cannot affect or be affected by the execution of another process Cooperating process can affect or be affected by the execution of another process Advantages of process cooperation Information sharing Computation speed-up Modularity Convenience Operating System Concepts 3.24 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Producer(P)-Consumer(C) C p Operating System Concepts 3.25 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Producer-Consumer Problem Paradigm for cooperating processes, producer process produces information that is consumed by a consumer process unbounded-buffer places no practical limit on the size of the buffer bounded-buffer assumes that there is a fixed buffer size Operating System Concepts 3.26 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Bounded-Buffer – Shared-Memory Solution Shared data #define BUFFER_SIZE 10 Typedef struct { ... } item; item buffer[BUFFER_SIZE]; int in = 0; int out = 0; Solution is correct (most of the time), but can only use BUFFER_SIZE-1 elements Operating System Concepts 3.27 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Bounded-Buffer Consumer process Producer process item nextConsumed; item nextProduced; while (1) { while (counter == 0) ; /* do nothing */ nextConsumed = buffer[out]; out = (out + 1) % BUFFER_SIZE; counter--; } while (1) { while (counter == BUFFER_SIZE) ; /* do nothing */ buffer[in] = nextProduced; in = (in + 1) % BUFFER_SIZE; counter++; } Operating System Concepts 3.28 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Interprocess Communication (IPC) Mechanism for processes to communicate and to synchronize their actions Message system – processes communicate with each other without resorting to shared variables IPC facility provides two operations: send(message) – message size fixed or variable receive(message) If P and Q wish to communicate, they need to: establish a communication link between them exchange messages via send/receive Implementation of communication link physical (e.g., shared memory, hardware bus) logical (e.g., logical properties) Operating System Concepts 3.31 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Implementation Questions How are links established? Can a link be associated with more than two processes? How many links can there be between every pair of communicating processes? What is the capacity of a link? Is the size of a message that the link can accommodate fixed or variable? Is a link unidirectional or bi-directional? Operating System Concepts 3.32 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Communications Models Operating System Concepts 3.33 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Direct Communication Processes must name each other explicitly: send (P, message) – send a message to process P receive(Q, message) – receive a message from process Q Properties of communication link Links are established automatically A link is associated with exactly one pair of communicating processes Between each pair there exists exactly one link The link may be unidirectional, but is usually bi-directional Operating System Concepts 3.34 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Indirect Communication Messages are directed and received from mailboxes (also referred to as ports) Each mailbox has a unique id Processes can communicate only if they share a mailbox Properties of communication link Link established only if processes share a common mailbox A link may be associated with many processes Each pair of processes may share several communication links Link may be unidirectional or bi-directional Operating System Concepts 3.35 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Indirect Communication Operations create a new mailbox send and receive messages through mailbox destroy a mailbox Primitives are defined as: send(A, message) – send a message to mailbox A receive(A, message) – receive a message from mailbox A Operating System Concepts 3.36 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Indirect Communication Mailbox sharing P1, P2, and P3 share mailbox A P1, sends; P2 and P3 receive Who gets the message? Solutions Allow a link to be associated with at most two processes Allow only one process at a time to execute a receive operation Allow the system to select arbitrarily the receiver. Sender is notified who the receiver was. Operating System Concepts 3.37 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Synchronization Message passing may be either blocking or non-blocking Blocking is considered synchronous Blocking send has the sender block until the message is received Blocking receive has the receiver block until a message is available Non-blocking is considered asynchronous Non-blocking send has the sender send the message and continue Non-blocking receive has the receiver receive a valid message or null Operating System Concepts 3.38 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Buffering Queue of messages attached to the link; implemented in one of three ways 1. Zero capacity – 0 messages Sender must wait for receiver (rendezvous) 2. Bounded capacity – finite length of n messages Sender must wait if link full 3. Unbounded capacity – infinite length Sender never waits Operating System Concepts 3.39 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Client-Server Communication Sockets Remote Procedure Calls Remote Method Invocation (Java) Operating System Concepts 3.40 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Sockets A socket is defined as an endpoint for communication Concatenation of IP address and port The socket 161.25.19.8:1625 refers to port 1625 on host 161.25.19.8 Communication consists between a pair of sockets Operating System Concepts 3.41 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Socket Communication Operating System Concepts 3.42 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Remote Procedure Calls Remote procedure call (RPC) abstracts procedure calls between processes on networked systems. Stubs – client-side proxy for the actual procedure on the server. The client-side stub locates the server and marshalls the parameters. The server-side stub receives this message, unpacks the marshalled parameters, and peforms the procedure on the server. Operating System Concepts 3.43 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Execution of RPC Operating System Concepts 3.44 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Remote Method Invocation Remote Method Invocation (RMI) is a Java mechanism similar to RPCs. RMI allows a Java program on one machine to invoke a method on a remote object. Operating System Concepts 3.45 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Marshalling Parameters Operating System Concepts 3.46 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Client-Server method comparison Socket RPC RMI CORBA Language support multi C/C++ Java multi Data type raw Procedure Remote object Remote object Speed fast More overhead More overhead More overhead Operating System Concepts 3.47 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 End of Chapter 3