Capital, Chapter Three: Money, or the Circulation of Commodities Money as Power Defetishize reading Class context Money as power for capital for workers Structure of Chapter Money as Measure of Value Money as Standard of Price Money as Means of Circulation Money as Store of Value (or Hoard) Money as Means of Payment World Money Money as Measure of Value Pre-sale: C - M(?) - C(?) “Price” is hypothetical, asked for but not paid Use value C has been produced, but has not found an expression of value After-sale: C - M - C Money paid; Price has been realized Amount of Money measures value of C Money as Standard of Price Money Form: (zB, yC, ... nN) = xAu Price form, e.g., zB = xAu Value is measured by quantity of gold, ounces Price is measured by money name of weight of gold, e.g., $35/oz, $1.00 = 1/35oz of Au Money names attached to coins Contradictions As Measure of Value & Standard of Price The distinction means possible rupture Price and value can differ e.g., debasement of currency e.g., clipped coins’ value less than nominal value e.g., Locke & recoinage during war Money as Means of Circulation - 1 As facilitator of exchange C - M - C represents circulation of commodities C - M = 1st metamorphosis (of form) realization of exchange value M - C = 2nd metamorphosis (of form) realization of use value Money as Means of Circulation -2 Syllogistic mediation C-M-C =P-U-I C is produced for its particularity exchange value M is the universal equivalent & mediator C is acquired for its individual use value in consumption Money as Means of Circulation -3 Prime example: LP - M - C LP = ability to work (for capital) M = wage C = C(MS) = means of subsistence All this working class view of working for money as a means to an end: consumption/life Possibility of Crisis - 1 Separation of sale & purchase = possibility of rupture in circuit C - M can be accomplished, but M - C might not be Money can be hoarded Say’s Law doesn’t hold in money economy Refusal to spend = inadequate aggregate D Possibility of Crisis - 2 In the case of LP - M - C Workers can refuse to sell LP for M e.g., refuse to leave land, strike Workers can refuse to spend (today) e.g., increase savings, reduce consumption demand Quantity Theory - 1 Classical Quantity Theory of Money M = ∑pq/V M = money, p = price, q = goods, V = velocity of money (e.g., turnover/yr) With q & V fixed, change in M produces a change in p, i.e., p = f(M) e.g. influx of gold from new world in 16th C meant inflation in Europe Quantity Theory - 2 Marx’s Interpretation M = ∑vq/V Behind price (p) lies value (v) So instead of p = f(M), we have M = f(v) e.g., 16th C gold had lower value per unit so, M had to increase to express ∑vq/V Quantity Theory - 3 Marx’s interpretation with paper money M = ∑vq/V Paper money only represents value Amount of value depends on ∑vq/V Value per unit of money depends on quantity of money So, Marx’s interpretation rejoins Classics’ Money as Store of Value Money “stores” value when hoarded Hoard functions in circulation Money stored, released Like foreign exchange reserves today So misers are misguided obstacles to circulation Money as Means of Payment With “credit money” purchase preceeds payment Payment follows later e.g., commerical credit, credit cards Separation = new potential for crisis e.g., debt crisis of 80s & 90s World Money In 19th C, int’l money was bullion/metal In late 20th C int’l money is credit gold has been demonitized although gold bugs still want it back Marx’s discussion of credit provides basis for analysis of International Monetary System & IMF --END--