Southwestern Virginia’s Regional Clinical Simulation Centers If I only knew then what I know now… Presented by: Cynthia G. Cunningham, MSN, RN June 8, 2005 State Council of Higher Education in Virginia (SCHEV) and regional nursing programs met to explore ways of partnering with public and private entities to: Maximize the use of scarce resources Address the shortage of nursing faculty Explore alternatives for nursing student clinical education THE PARTNERSHIP Collaboration of nursing educators to develop strategies to address the shortage Radford University Jefferson College of Health Sciences Wytheville Community College New River Community College Virginia Western Community College Patrick Henry Community College RU SON ASSUMED LEADERSHIP Developed the CSC concept Submitting CSC proposal to SCHEV Proposal was included in the Governor’s Budget for the next biennium Funding for the project was allocated to Radford University in July 2006 OVERALL GOAL OF THE CSC To alleviate the shortage of nurses in Virginia by increasing the capacity of nursing schools to enroll students, maximizing use of faculty resources, and decreasing competition for scarce clinical sites VISION The Clinical Simulation Center’s will provide a hands-on learning experience in an environment that is safe and realistic, producing quality nurses with enhanced critical thinking abilities, communication skills and collaboration experience THE BUSINESS PLAN History Profile Business Summary Product/Services Industry Analysis Marketing Analysis Organization/Management Financial Section Assumptions Revenue Streams CSC Budgetary Projections Personnel Operating Equipment Lists The renovation SIMmares Definition: Simulation based “disturbing” dreams. Typically occurring between 3am - 5am. Occasionally may happen during the day. Renovation/Space Planning Team CSC Director Facilities Planning and Construction Laerdal Sales Rep Education Management Solutions (EMS) Hardware Design Specialist Create-a-lab Rep SIMmare #1 My renovation team is gone and I don’t know what I am doing…. Renovation team turn over…... Laerdal rep decided to change territories • • Wanted to move back to Texas ………… Education Management Solutions (EMS) rep decided traveling was not conducive to a personnel life! • • Was married within a year Create-a-lab rep decided to start a family • • Had a bouncing baby boy Do you think it could be me?!!!! If I knew then what I know now I would have an exit review with any renovation team member leaving the project. I would visit more SimCenters and ask more questions r/t design I would participate in more SUN’s And if necessary …………. I live on the Lake and have a boat and SeaDoo… Great for entertaining …..boating…..fishing……relaxing... I have two Newfoundlands ……..and they are great with children Due renovation team turn-over I ASSuME’d and my new team members ASSuME’d SIMmare #2 The control room CONNECTIVITY If I knew then what I know now I would have clear operational expectations – central control room separate from SIMroom with A/V observation I would include IT in the renovation team I would include – SimPhones to connect each SimRoom to each control room operating station My SIMteam RU SON CSC Director (MSN) RHEC Site RU West Site 2 MSN’s, 1 IT Specialist 1 Admin Specialist II VWCC PHCC JCHS 2 MSN’s, 1 IT Specialist 1 Admin Specialist II RU WCC NRCC RU SIMmare #4 Receiving and Installing 1.9 Million Dollars of Equipment Of course spending was not the nightmare…. Receiving, installing and tagging all items > $5000 and all IT equipment was! Receiving Equipment - Laerdal Humm Include “onsite delivery & installation” in purchasing agreement This doesn't look good Sturgis DREAMS: Russell returns to Virginia Laerdal representative after receiving equipment – manikins, room furnishings, task trainers, virtual IV…… Installing Equipment Room set-ups per site: 1 Med/Surg SimRoom 1 ICU SimRoom 1OB SimRoom 1 Pediatric SimRoom 2 Exam Rooms 1 Multipurpose classroom with 3-5 patient beds Simulation Apartment Computer Classroom Manikin Assembly: 4 SimMan 4 SimBaby 2 Nursing & 2 ALS Anne’s 2 MegaCode & 2 Nursing Kelly’s 2 Nursing & 2 MegaCode Kid’s 2 Nursing Baby 2 Noelle 4 Adult & 2 Peds Virtual IV, ……. Installing Equipment - Laerdal SimMan, try to behave yourself Ouch! SimMan kicked me! Sturgis DREAMING: My new territory …TEXAS! Laerdal representative after installation of equipment Installing A/V & IT equipment Room set-up x 7 per site: 2 Pan Tilt Zoom Cameras Microphone Cabling between room and control room to connect (cat 5, extender boxes) Cabling between room and server room (A/V connections) Cabling between control room and server room Server Room: 2 DVR’s 2 computers to control DVR 1 computer to manage video 1 SQL server (database) 1 IIS server (web) 1 Quantum Tape Library 1 SNAP Server for video storage Installing A/V & IT equipment If I knew then what I know now I would hire 1 IT specialist and 5 MSNs: Rationale for one IT specialist: A bored IT leads to a gone IT Most everything can be fixed remotely Standardization between sites Rationale for Additional MSN: Increased capacity of student’s served (450 students/semester) Increased volume of scenarios produced Back-up for staffing due to illness/surgery, time off…. SIMmare #5 Manikin responses are not in sync with monitor readings or scenario program Another CONNECTIVITY Problem Nine Pin Problem PROBLEM: Cable extender box – nine pin connection – transmission delays between control room and manikin. Manikin pulses and heart rate did not correlate with programmed settings and monitor waveforms (EKG, Pulse…) SOLUTION: Pull nine-pin cable through wall/ceiling and directly connect to laptop, i.e., by passing the rose boxes. If I knew then what I know now I would request that integrating equipment be tested with the manikin system prior to purchase or include a contingency plan for beta testing in the purchasing agreement Imagine: No Monitors Imagine: No plan to connect manikin to the Laptop CONTROL ROOM MED/SURG ROOM OB ROOM PEDIATRIC ROOM INTENSIVE CARE ROOM DEBRIEFING ROOM Lessons Learned Over TIME Scenario Development Student driven Organization Revenue Planning Student Preparation & Evaluation Partnering/Bartering Admission ticket Incorporate pre/post encounter evaluation and add NCLEX ? to pre Organized Debriefing Start early… Reinforce concepts/nursing process included in “admission ticket”, preencounter, and scenario Incorporate NCLEX ?s Partner and/or barter with as many organizations as possible Scheduling Charge fee for unused time Block scheduling Curriculum Integration Orientation Boot-camps Fundamental Front-loading Standardized patient encounters Mental health Assessment, H&P Follow course syllabus when choosing scenario Consider fidelity Choose the “right” manikin/SP for the simulation If equipment is needed actually use the equipment – headwall O2/suctioning, IV pump, 12-lead…. Include supporting documentation – SIMChart Suspend disbelief – do not ask students to “pretend” or use phrases like “if you were taking care of a real patient….you would….. Student Driven NOT Operator Driven Student intervention or non-intervention dictates manikin action All vocals are pre-recorded Use handlers for all actions that are not tied to time or sequencing If sequencing is important, incorporate standardized cues (vocal, manikin action) Scenario Development Lessons Learned Process SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT & REVIEW & STORAGE Standardized event menus Indicate events with v. if vocal is attached Lab reports, xrays,…as pdf files to display on pt. monitor Scenarios reviewed & revised every summer to insure best practice Scenario Storage Lessons Learned SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT & REVIEW & STORAGE Shared scenario storage system “FinalSim” houses all up-dated scenarios - batch file runs every night to load to Laerdal computers Preparation-Evaluation-Debriefing Lessons Learned Putting it all Together Assessing Preparedness Need better criteria to assess preparedness. Solutions to Assessing Preparedness Data Collection Too much information in post encounter evaluation Solutions to Data Collection The bigger picture Information is fragmented – inconsistent flow from prep work through post encounter evaluation. All scenarios have an admission ticket – student must complete the admission ticket to participate in the simulation Incorporate a pre-encounter and postencounter student questionnaires Solution to making a bigger impact Incorporate nursing process in pre/post encounter evaluation Incorporate NCLEX question in preencounter and into debriefing Scenario: CHF Patient: Willie Morrison Gender: Female Age: 86 Weight: 44.5 kg Height: 152.4 com Expected Simulation Run Time: 30 minutes Location: PCU Simulation Learning Objectives: Name: Date: Instructor: 1. Utilize patient laboratory results and assessment findings to guide medication administration. 2. Insert foley catheter utilizing aseptic technique. 3. Utilize nursing measures and physician orders to maximize gas exchange and decrease cardiac workload . 4. Conduct focused assessment pertinent for patient with CHF. Patient Information: Increasing shortness of breath and muscular weakness over the past week with non-productive cough and chest pain. Past Medical History: Atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, vitamin D deficiency, hyperlipidemia, hypertension Allergies: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors Social History Widow; retired elementary school teacher; no history of alcohol or tobacco use; one daughter lives next door and is her primary caretaker Surgeries/Procedures: Open reduction and internal fixation of right hip fracture 5 years ago; bilateral cataract extractions with intraocular lens placement; vertebroplasty Please review the following PRIOR to your simulation experience: Intravenous potassium and lasix, PO lanoxin, coumadin, fosamax, calcium, vytorin, glyburide, lopressor, imdur, ASA, regular insulin Possible skills: foley catheter insertion, use of infusion pump Pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis Focused assessments pertinent to diagnoses Questions to Answer Prior to Simulation Session (Please staple answers to the questions below to this ticket for admission to simulation session. Without this ticket and completed questions you will not be allowed to participate in the scheduled scenarios). The completed questions will be turned in and checked by your class instructor. 1. List the 2 most important care priorities for a patient with congestive heart failure? 2. What are the clinical manifestations of hypokalemia? 3. What is the target/goal PT/INR for a patient on Coumadin for atrial fibrillation? 4. Describe the differences in presentation/symptomatology between a patient with left–sided vs. right-sided heart failure. Ancheta, I. (2006). A Retrospective Pilot Study: Management of Patients with Heart Failure. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 25(5), 220-233. Deglin, J., & Vallerand, A. (Eds.). (2007, April 19). Potassium Supplements [Electronic version]. In Davis's Drug Guide for Nurses. Retrieved from STAT!Ref Online Electronic Medical Library: http://online.statref.com/Document/DocumentBodyContent.aspx?DocId=846&FxId=58&S Hilton, P. (Ed.). (2004). Fundamental Nursing Skills. Philadelphia: Whurr Kozier, B., Erb, G., Berman, A., & Snyder, S. (2002). Techniques in Clinical Nursing: Basic to Intermediate Skills (5th). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Skidmore-Roth, L. (2004). 2004 Mosby's Nursing Drug Reference. St. Louis: Mosby. Smeltzer, S., Bare, B., Hinkle, J., & Cheever, K. (2008). Brunner & Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing (11th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins .Sole, M., Klein, D., & Moseley, M. (2005). Introduction to Critical Care Nursing (4th Ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier.] Hypokalemia-New Treatments. (May 2, 2007). Retrieved September 16, 2007, from Library of the National Medical Society: http://www.medical-library.org/journals2a/hypokalemia.htm Debriefing Lessons Learned Student driven Incorporate admission ticket questions, pre-encounter into discussion Video review NCLEX question review 1. A client admitted with a diagnosis of chronic atrial fibrillation is on a daily dose of warfarin (Coumadin) 2.5 mg. The serum international normalized ratio (INR) is 4.7. What intervention should the nurse be prepared to initiate? 1. 2. 3. 4. Observe the client for a possibility of an embolic event. Have a partial prothrombin time (PTT) drawn to completely evaluate the level of anticoagulation. Prepare to administer protamine sulfate. Monitor the client for signs of bleeding. 1. A client admitted with a diagnosis of chronic atrial fibrillation is on a daily dose of warfarin (Coumadin) 2.5 mg. The serum international normalized ratio (INR) is 4.7. What intervention should the nurse be prepared to initiate? 1. Incorrect. If the client were at risk for an embolism, the INR would be very low, reflecting inadequate anticoagulation. 2. Incorrect. PTT evaluates anticoagulation levels as a result of heparin, not warfarin. 3. Incorrect. Protamine sulfate is the antidote for heparin, not warfarin. 4. Correct. The level of anticoagulation, as reflected by the INR, is too high and the client is at risk for bleeding. The serum INR is done to reflect the effectiveness of oral anticoagulants, especially warfarin. The normal value is 2.0-3.0 for clients on anticoagulation therapy. Test-Taking Tip: Because the drug is a anticoagulant, choose the “assessment” type of answer for the one most related to anticoagulant therapy. Eliminate answers 2 and 3 since r/t heparin. Evaluation Lessons Learned RAGE Nursing Process Driven Medication error reporting Curriculum integration questions Any questions?