Criminal Law Ninth Edition Book Cover Here Chapter 5 Offenses Against Persons— Excluding Sex Offenses Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 1 5.2 Homicide Common Law In early common law, an intentional killing was homicide. In later years, homicide was generally defined as the unlawful killing of a human being by another human being. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 2 5.2 Homicide Common Law Year-and-a-day rule State v. Orrell (1826) If death did not take place within a year and a day of the time of receiving the wound, the law draws the conclusion that it was not the cause of death; and neither the court nor jury can draw a contrary one. In order to be murder, the killing had to be done with malice aforethought. Malice aforethought is a predetermination to commit an act without legal justification or excuse. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 3 5.2 Homicide Model Penal Code A person is guilty of homicide if he purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently causes the death of another human being. Criminal homicide is murder, manslaughter, or negligent homicide. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 4 5.2 Homicide State Statutes, Codes, and Cases Wording of the Model Penal Code. Retained the distinction between first and second degrees of murder. Other states have divided manslaughter into degrees. The actus reus of homicide is always an act that results in the death of another. The mens rea determines the type of homicide. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 5 5.2 Homicide Actus Reus: (Causation: Year-and-a-Day Rule) Advancements in medical science have necessitated modifications. State v. Hefler Concluded that the law was an anachronism Rogers v. Tennessee Victim died of kidney infection 15 months after the defendant stabbed the man in the heart. The Supreme Court upheld the Tennessee court decision that affirmed his conviction and held that it was not a violation of due process because it was not unexpected that the rule would be abandoned. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 6 5.2 Homicide Actus Reus: Defining Death Under common law, death was defined as the cessation of respiratory functions. Brain-death statutes have been implemented to determine when a person is dead. The Uniform Determination of Death Act (1980) Codifies the existing common law basis of determining death—total failure of the cardiorespiratory system—and extends the common law determination of death to include irreversible loss of all brain function. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 7 5.2 Homicide Actus Reus: Defining Death A Washington court held that it is for the law, rather than medicine, to define the standard of death. In re Welfare of Bowman Irreversible cessation of circulation and respiratory functions, or Irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem, is “dead.” Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 8 5.2 Homicide Terry Schiavo Case Schiavo was diagnosed as being in a permanent vegetative state and had been for 15 years. She was not “brain dead” according to the definitions. Her husband and her doctors had the legal authority to remove her feeding tubes. Parents did not want them removed. Without statutory authority, removing feeding tubes from someone in a vegetative state may be murder. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 9 5.2 Homicide Exception to Double Jeopardy What happens if a victim dies as a result of an assault after the perpetrator has already been charged and convicted of a lesser crime? In an exception to double jeopardy recognized by some states, a second prosecution may commence because of a finding that the more serious crime of homicide includes additional elements to the lesser crime of assault. New York v. Latham Pled guilty to attempted murder in the second degree. Victim later died and the defendant was retried and convicted of depraved indifference murder. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 10 5.3 Murder Common Law Murder is defined as a homicide committed with malice aforethought. Elements of murder Unlawful killing A human being By another human being With malice aforethought Felony-murder Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 11 5.3 Murder Unlawful Killing A killing is unlawful unless it comes under the justifiable homicide or excusable category. Excusable homicide is committed by one doing a lawful act without intention to hurt, or in self-defense. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 12 5.3 Murder A Human Being In the absence of a statute, a person cannot be convicted of murder unless the person whose death occurred was born alive. Almost half of the states have amended their statutes to define murder as the “unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus…” or created a new feticide statute to cover the killing of an unborn. Feticide is the destruction of the fetus; the act by which criminal abortion is produced. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 13 5.3 Murder By Another Human Being Proof that the killing was committed by another human being requires that evidence be produced to show that the person accused committed the act or put into motion the means that resulted in the death. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 14 5.3 Murder With Malice Aforethought Early common law required at least an attempt to kill, plus an element of hatred, spite, or ill-will, in order to bring the killing within the malice definition. Judges required that the prosecution prove that the defendant actually had a previously thought-out intent to kill. Later the courts realized that murder may be committed under some circumstances without the intent to kill. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 15 5.3 Murder Felony-Murder Felony-murder doctrine Under early English law, one who, in the commission or attempted commission of any felony, caused another’s death, could be found guilty of murder. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 16 5.3 Murder Model Penal Code Not differentiated into first and second degree. A person may be found guilty of murder if the killing was done purposely or knowingly. Criminal homicide also constitutes murder when it is “committed recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.” Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 17 5.3 Murder State Statutes, Codes, and Cases Some states have modified the common law relating to murder, others have adopted the Model Penal Code in substance, while still others have taken parts of the Model Penal Code and retained parts of their previously written statutes. Some states include provisions that retain the felonymurder doctrine. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 18 5.3 Murder First-Degree Murder Intent to commit murder, accompanied by premeditation and deliberation. Premeditation means that one in fact did reflect, at least for a short period, before the act of killing. Second-Degree Murder If premeditation or intent cannot be proven. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 19 5.3 Murder Depraved Indifference Murder When an offender does an act that shows a complete disregard for human life and there is a probable certainty of injury, that offender may be found guilty of depraved heart murder even if they had no intent to kill. Transferred Intent The doctrine of transferred intent holds an offender responsible even when the end result is not what was intended. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 20 5.3 Murder Felony-Murder Common law = occurred during the course of a felony Model Penal Code = limited to specific felonies State statutes = also restricted to only certain felonies Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 21 5.3 Murder Summary Murder is often divided into first- and second-degree in modern statutes. The difference between the two levels of murder is based on the mens rea. The degree of murder will affect the level of punishment. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 22 5.3 Murder First-Degree Murder A/R M/R Unlawful killing of one by another human Intentional, premeditated Second-Degree Murder A/R Unlawful killing of one by another human M/R Without premeditation or with callous disregard or wanton disregard or depraved indifference Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 23 5.3 Murder Felony-Murder A/R Unlawful killing or foreseeable death + A/R of underlying felony M/R Intentional (of the underlying felony) + (in some states) callous disregard Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 24 5.4 Voluntary Manslaughter Common Law Voluntary manslaughter is the intentional killing of one human being by another without justification or excuse, but committed under the influence of passion induced by great provocation. The following conditions must exist: There must have been adequate provocation, The killing must have been in the heat of passion, It must have been a sudden passion, and There must have been a causal connection between the provocation, the passion, and the fatal act. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 25 5.4 Voluntary Manslaughter Model Penal Code Does not distinguish between voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. Criminal homicide constitutes manslaughter when It is committed recklessly; or A homicide which would otherwise be murder is committed under the influence of extreme mental or emotional influence for which there is reasonable explanation or excuse. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 26 5.4 Voluntary Manslaughter State Statutes, Codes, and Cases Two of the elements are exactly the same as those of murder: An unlawful killing One person by another Most distinguishable element is the sudden passion aroused by extreme provocation. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 27 5.4 Voluntary Manslaughter Provocation Must be of such a nature as to be recognized at law as adequate for that purpose. Heat of Passion The emotional state must have dominated the slayer at the time of the homicidal act, and it must have been entertained toward the person slain, and not to another person. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 28 5.4 Voluntary Manslaughter No “Cooling-Off” If it appears that the defendant reflected, deliberated, or cooled off for any period before the fatal act, the killing is murder. What constitutes “cooling-off time” depends upon the nature and circumstances of provocation, the extent to which the passion has been aroused, and the nature of the act causing the provocation. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 29 5.4 Voluntary Manslaughter A Causal Connection The heat of passion resulted from justifiable provocation and that the heat of passion caused the act that resulted in death. There must be a causal link between the provocation, the passion, and the act. Burden of Proof Once a defendant places provocation and passion in issue, the state then bears the burden of negating the presence of sudden heat beyond a reasonable doubt. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 30 5.4 Voluntary Manslaughter Voluntary Manslaughter A/R M/R Unlawful killing of one by another human Intentional, knowing but without “malice”—may be defined as “without premeditation” (Attendant circumstances)—provocation sufficient to incite a reasonable person to passion that undermines reason with no cooling-off period, and death was the direct cause of provocation. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 31 Two kinds 5.5 Involuntary Manslaughter The killing occurs in the course of committing an unlawful act, or Death occurs during the negligent commission or omission of an otherwise lawful act. Elements An unlawful killing of one person by another, Unintentional but: During commission of a lawful act performed with gross negligence, or Failure to perform a duty, or During the commission of a crime not a felony. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 32 5.5 Involuntary Manslaughter Model Penal Code Has no section on involuntary manslaughter. Has a provision regarding negligent homicide. Negligent homicide Criminal homicide constitutes negligent homicide when it is committed negligently. Requires proof of substantial fault and limits penal sanctions to cases in which there are gross deviations from ordinary standards of conduct. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 33 5.5 Involuntary Manslaughter State Statutes, Codes, and Cases Some states follow the Model Penal Code. Other jurisdictions retain the common law involuntary manslaughter rule. Others have added special statutes. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 34 Involuntary Manslaughter A/R Killing of one by another human while doing an unlawful act or a lawful act in a criminally negligent or reckless manner. M/R 5.5 Involuntary Manslaughter Reckless, negligent Misdemeanor Manslaughter A/R Killing during the commission of a non-inherently dangerous felony or misdemeanor M/R The mens rea required for the underlying crime Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 35 5.5 Involuntary Manslaughter Negligent Homicide (MPC) A/R Unlawful killing of one by another human being while doing an act in a criminally negligent manner M/R Criminal negligence Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 36 5.6 Suicide and Assisted Suicide Common Law Suicide is defined as intentional self-destruction. At common law suicide was a felony and was know as felo de se or felon of oneself. Suicide was punished by an ignominious burial and the forfeiture of goods and chattels to the king. If two persons mutually agreed to commit suicide, and one survived the survivor was guilty of the murder of the one who died. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 37 5.6 Suicide and Assisted Suicide Model Penal Code Does not define suicide as a crime. There is a crime of solicited or assisted suicide. Causing Suicide as Criminal Homicide A person may be convicted of criminal homicide for causing another to commit suicide only if he purposely causes such suicide by force, duress, or deception. Aiding or Soliciting Suicide as an Independent Offense A person who purposely aids or solicits another to commit suicide if guilty of a felony of the second degree if his conduct causes such suicide or an attempted suicide. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 38 5.6 Suicide and Assisted Suicide State Statutes, Codes, and Cases The majority of states do not criminalize suicide. In most states it is a crime to help another commit or attempt suicide. Dr. Jack Kevorkian Washington v. Glucksberg Vacco v. Quill Prohibition against causing or aiding suicide does not violate the due process clause. There is a clear line between assisting suicide and withdrawal or permitting the refusal of unwanted lifesaving medical treatment. Gonzales v. Oregon The federal government sought a ruling that the physician’s prescription of drugs to end one’s life was not a legitimate medical use. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 39 5.6 Suicide and Assisted Suicide Although there are no current statutes or case law that criminalize suicide, most states do have laws that prohibit one party from assisting another in committing suicide and the Supreme Court has upheld such laws, finding that there is no constitutional right to die. Since Gonzales v. Oregon, however, the door is open for states to pass their own laws that allow for assisted suicide by physicians in certain limited circumstances when a patient is terminally ill. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 40 5.6 Suicide and Assisted Suicide Assisting Suicide A/R Cause (through duress or force), solicit, assist, aid, advise suicide of another M/R Purposeful Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 41 5.7 Assault and Battery Common Law Assault and battery were two separate crimes. An assault was any unlawful offer or attempt to injure another, with an apparent present ability to effectuate the attempt under circumstances creating a fear of imminent peril. A specific intent crime Battery was the unlawful touching of the person of another by the aggressor or by some substance put in motion by him. A general intent crime Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 42 5.7 Assault and Battery Model Penal Code Simple Assault Attempts to cause or purposely, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; or Negligently causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon; or Attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily harm. Aggravated Assault Attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such injury purposely, knowingly, or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life; or Attempt to cause or purposely or knowingly causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 43 5.7 Assault and Battery State Statutes, Codes, and Cases Elements of Assault Attempt or offer. The force intended to be applied must be put into motion. Mere preparation does not amount to an assault; there must be some act that could apparently produce injury. The force or violence offered must be unlawful, but it may be in any degree. The attempt or offer must be directed toward another person. There need not be any touching or striking of the person; but there must be an offer to use force to injure another. The prosecution must show that the person is placed in reasonable apprehension of receiving an immediate battery; there must be a showing of force or menace of violence that would be sufficient to put a person of reasonable firmness in fear of immediate bodily harm. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 44 5.7 Assault and Battery State Statutes, Codes, and Cases Elements of Assault It is necessary is to show “apparent present ability” to effectuate the harm. Assault does not occur unless the individual is placed in reasonable fear of imminent bodily harm, but if the victim is placed in reasonable fear of bodily harm, by conduct of the defendant, and the defendant had the apparent ability to carry out the threatening nature of his act, it is not necessary that the prosecution show that the defendant had the actual ability to carry out the act. An unlawful; application of force; to the person of another. The application of force must be unlawful. The force may be direct or indirect. The force must be to the person of another and be unpermitted. But it is unnecessary that the victim’s body or even his or her clothing be touched, because touching anything connected with his or her person is sufficient. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 45 5.7 Assault and Battery Mayhem Maliciously depriving another of the use of his limbs so as to make him unable to defend himself against adversaries. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 46 5.7 Assault and Battery Assault A/R Attempt, threaten or offer, with unlawful force, to inflict immediate bodily injury accompanied with apparent present ability or offensive touching upon another M/R Purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently (depending on level or particular type of assault) Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 47 5.8 Kidnapping and Related Offenses Common Law Kidnapping was defined as the forcible abduction and carrying away of a man, woman, or child from his or her own country into another. Traditional elements Unlawful imprisonment Moving him or her to another place To unlawfully obtain ransom Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 48 5.8 Kidnapping and Related Offenses Unlawful Imprisonment Unlawfully restraining, unlawfully removing, or unlawfully confining a person against their will. Elements Knowingly, Unlawfully, Restraining another, and Under circumstances that expose the victim to a risk of physical injury. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 49 5.8 Kidnapping and Related Offenses Model Penal Code A person is guilty of kidnapping if he unlawfully removes another from his place of residence or business, or a substantial distance from the vicinity where he is found, or if he unlawfully confines another for a substantial period in a place of isolation, with any of the following purposes: To hold for ransom or reward, or as a shield or hostage; or To facilitate commission of any felony or flight thereafter; or To inflict bodily injury on or to terrorize the victim or another; or To interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 50 5.8 Kidnapping and Related Offenses State Statutes, Codes, and Cases Traditional elements Detaining another By force or fraud Without consent Without legal cause Asportation For ransom or other unlawful purpose Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 51 5.8 Kidnapping and Related Offenses Parental Kidnapping Occurs when a parent who does not have legal custody of a child refuses to return the child to the custodial parent, and/or abducts the child. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 52 5.8 Kidnapping and Related Offenses Summary Kidnapping has maintained the elements of common law for the most part; however, case law has greatly reduced the asportation requirement. The common law requirement that the reason for the kidnapping be for ransom or another unlawful purpose has also been expanded, either by case law or statute. The most recent issue concerning the law of kidnapping is how to deal with parental kidnappings, especially those in which the parent has at least some arguable noble purpose in protecting their child from an abusive custodial parent. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 53 5.8 Kidnapping and Related Offenses Summary States must honor the custodial orders of other states and, therefore, parents must be deterred from taking the law into their own hands by seizing the child. Everyone can agree, however, that these cases are different from kidnappings for ransom. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 54 5.8 Kidnapping and Related Offenses Kidnapping A/R Detaining another, with force or fraud, without consent, asportation, for ransom or other unlawful purpose M/R Purposefully, knowingly Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 55 5.9 Hate Crimes (Bias Crimes) Hate crime statutes are similar to traditional criminal statutes prohibiting acts such as assault, battery, or vandalism; however the hate crime statutes require an additional element—that the victim (or property) was selected as a target because of the victim’s membership in a protected group. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 56 Two components 5.9 Hate Crimes (Bias Crimes) Prohibited acts Protected groups Forty-nine states have adopted some form of hate crime legislation. Federal legislation has been enacted that requires states to keep track of hate crime statistics. Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 57 5.9 Hate Crimes (Bias Crimes) Hate or Bias Crimes A/R Certain specified (illegal) acts, i.e., murder, assault, vandalism, kidnapping; against specific victims (members of protected groups) M/R Intentional Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved 58